AFGHANISTAN SITUATION REPORT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
17
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 16, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 20, 1984
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5.pdf522.96 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 !"A Directorate of -Top SPff*7 Afghanistan Situation Report NESA M 84-10121 CX 20 March 1984 naA Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 TOP SECRET AFGHANISTAN SITUATION REPORT CONTENTS DESERTIONS AND MUTINIES INCREASE Widespread mutinies and desertions in the Kabul area followed the extension of service there from three to four years. 25X1 PERSPECTIVES PAKISTAN AND THE REFUGEES Afghan refugees have not become a heavy economic liability for Pakistan, but in some circumstances serious problems between them and Pakistanis could grow, causing Islamabad to seek an accommodation with Kabul and Moscow. AFGHANISTAN: CHANGING INSURGENT DYNAMICS Studies of a number of tribal Insurrections suggest that the Afghan resistance is now in transition to a modern nontribal insurgency that will be more difficult for the Soviets to defeat. This document is prepared weekly by the Office of Near Eastern and South Asian Analysis and the Office of Soviet Analysis. Questions or comments on the issues raised In the Publication h Irected to 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Shebergha~ '.JOWZJAN ~ayyebate' 60 o'Urgench `~1 ;FARA Chard h u Bukhan Qal'eh-ye Now Hat q " 1 _ If /?Maymangh ! t v FARYAB \ QROZ Samar~canG~~, -~ _,~SOVIET UJI,QN `~ Karshi~ WR( . Jeyr Tan It yvadh Maza ?e BALKH f hart amanga I$AMANGy Ni PAK I PAKTIA a~ QKa^I Shar('J l ~ PAK iIXA ZABQI ,~ Qandahar QANDA\kiAR 68r 1 /4Tashkent erglez Ni rat Py ushaab Bamian RARVn kfi~ hN( /' Leninaltaid ' WGAR idw ~?;Qsh'~ ug 1\ Tbio an Eshka hem as a d0O [3ADAKN N TAK}IAB -, Oh a aLA MAw op0 r ,E \MeMat Ira I sadabad bad, hawar ! J UsIa rachinar Khyb Pass `a~ivalpind- ~~/ Wit I helum, Sarg ~ha o (ala NANGARHAR laxkorgan' Nok Kundi Boundary tepresentatron is not necessarily authoritative. - 76 Neryrr Y Afghanistan International boundary -.- Internal administrative boundary it National capital O Internal administrative capital Railroad Road 0 50 100 150 200 Kilometers 0 50 100 150 200 Miles 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 TuP SEu1 1 ? 25X1 DESERTIONS AND MUTINIES INCREASE The Afghan Government extended mandatory service for soldiers stationed in Kabul from three to four years on 8 March, causing widespread desertions and mutinies, according to US Embassy sources. The next day half of the military posts near Kabul airport were unoccupied. about 120 Afghan soldiers from the 8th Division estroye two military posts before loininq insurgent forces in the Paghman area, west of Kabul. The regime presumably increased the term of service because its recent conscription campaigns have failed. The change is likely to affect most Afghan troops because soldiers are usually assigned to Kabul at some point in their enlistments. It will also increase the number of civilians, particularly men, fleeing Afghanistan. News of the desertions in Kabul may encourage troops in other Afghan units to mutiny or desert. 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX 25X1 25X1 25X1 1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 i ur grunt i -- Soviet Ambassador Tabayev indicated that the upcoming Cordovez visit is unlike to lead to progress in the UN negotiations. Babrak Karmal "unyielding" on the Afghan regime's position. Chinese aid to the resistance would continue despite Soviet 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX 25X1 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 efforts to repair Sino-Soviet relations in other areas. 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX 25X1 SOVA M 84-10042CX 3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Afghan refugees in Pakistan have not become a heavy economic or political liability for Islamabad. Frictions between them and Pakistanis could grow, however, and lead to serious problems for Islamabad in some circumstances. A sharp increase in tensions between Pakistanis and the refugees would erode political stability in Pakistan and perhaps cause Islamabad to seek an accommodation on the Soviet presence in Afghanistan with Kabul and Moscow. The Refugees Pakistani Government registration figures indicate that about 2.8 million Afghans are in Pakistan. The US Embassy, however, believes that multiple registrations, the registration of nonexistent dependents, and the return of some registered refugees to Afghanistan have inflated this figure. Based on reports of discrepancies between registrations and numbers actually in some refugee camps, the embassy believes that between 1.75 and 1.9 million Afghans are in Pakistani refugee camps. New refugees continue to arrive in Pakistan but, the rate is now 2,000 to 3,000 a month compared to 100,000 or more a month a few years ago. Heavy fighting near the border can still bring a surge--170,000 in the last four months of 1983--but we believe most of these refugees return home when military operations die down. Most of the predominately Pushtun refugees reside in areas of Pakistan where cultural differences with the local population are minimal. About three-fourths are in the North-West Frontier Province near the Afghan border, and most of the remainder are in Baluchistan, primarily in Pushtun areas. Less than 2 percent are in Punjab and Sind Provinces. Islamabad plans to transfer about 300,000 refugees to camps in western Punjab, but less than 100,000 had moved by early February. 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85TOO287ROO1301030001-5 TOP SECRET According to the Pakistani press, refugees are barred from buying real estate or engaging in business activities that would lead to permanent residence, but other economic activity is permitted. Most live in camps near the Afghan border by choice. Refugees are free to live in any part of Pakistan, although Islamabad has put restrictions on the movement of large groups. Some refugee groups that migrated seasonally from one part of Afghanistan to another have tried to follow the same pattern in Pakistan. Some Pakistanis claim that the refugees are taking jobs from local Pakistanis, forcing up rents and food prices, and living better than Pakistanis on largess from Islamabad. We believe that these claims are exaggerated and that the economic burden for Pakistan has not been excessive. the direct cost to Pakistan of supporting the refugees is about $180 million a year, or some 2.5 percent of the budget. The movement of food and other refugee supplies costs Pakistan about $75 million. Other expenses include salaries of about 6,000 Pakistanis involved with refugee issues, education for some 70,000 refugee students, and support for 85 health units. When dealing with the. United States and international relief agencies, we believe there is a tendency for Islamabad to pad its expenses. Even if the Pakistani cost figures are accurate, however, they do not reflect the indirect benefits Pakistan receives from the relief effort. The US Embassy estimates that between 110,000 and 150,000 tons of donated food--a quarter to a third of the total supplied by international organizations--is reexported by the refugees to Afghanistan or sold in Pakistan. We believe that the proceeds from these sales generally remain in Pakistan. Pakistani businessmen, such as tent manufacturers and millers, have had lucrative contracts with relief organizations, and other Pakistanis are employed by these groups. The UN refugee organization estimates that it will spend about $60 million in Pakistan in the coming year, including $7 million to help defray the Pakistani Government's administrative expenses. Some Pakistanis probably have lost jobs to refugees, but US officials report that most refugees have filled vacancies caused by the migration 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX c Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85TOO287ROO1301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 i ur aci.nc i of Pakistani workers to the Gulf or are doing work done historically by migrant Afghan tribesmen. Because the refugees apparently receive more than enough food from international donors, and because prices have risen in parts of Pakistan where the refugee presence is negligible, we believe that there is little connection between the refugee influx and inflation. Nonetheless, US officials report that pressures generated by the refugees have had some impact on rents, at least in Quetta and Peshawar. The 70,000 Afghans being educated by Pakistan constitute only a small percentage of the over a million Afghan refugee children in the country. Moreover, less than one percent of Pakistan's medical personnel are assigned to refugee health centers. Pakistanis who lack adequate health care or whose children cannot go to school, however, are likely to believe that they suffer from the diversion of resources to the refugees. US officials report that many Pakistanis believe the refugees have been a primary cause of growing crime and disorder in the North-West Frontier and Baluchistan. The evidence is contradictory. Refugees have committed some murders and robberies, and fighting between rival insurgent groups has occasionally broken out in Pakistan. 25X1 however, the crime rate in the province 25X1 has not increased since the refugees began arriving. a 25X1 whispering campaign has linked refugees to every unsolved crime. 25X1 Violence has increased in Kurram Agency where there have been serious clashes between rival Shia and Sunni Pakistani tribes. Their dispute is centuries old, but we believe that the arrival of enough Afghan Sunnis to double the agency's population has contributed significantly to sectarian tensions. In the Khyber Agency, on the other hand, an increase in violence has been sparked by government efforts to eliminate heroin production and appears unrelated to the refugees. We do not expect tensions between refugees and Pakistanis to become a serious problem. There were more violent incidents and protests against 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 rur Stuii i the refugees in 1983 than in previous years, but the number was small, and we know of only about a dozen serious incidents. In some circumstances, however, government and popular attitudes toward the refugees'could change markedly and the situation could deteriorate. -- If there were a significant decline in jobs for Pakistanis in the Gulf, competition between returning workers and refugees could become severe enough to lead to violence. -- If foreign assistance declined, Islamabad would have to assume more of the relief effort and cut back on other Pakistani programs, or reduce support for the refugees. The latter option might cause a violent reaction in the camps and greater refugee pressure on local economies. -- If Soviet military pressure drove hundreds of thousands of additional Afghans into Pakistan, facilities in areas where most refugees now live would be overburdened, lowering living standards and increasing tensions. If the government tried to move the refugees to other areas, it would meet resistance both from Afghans unwilling to leave the border areas and from Pakistanis in non-Pushtun areas. -- If the refugee stay is prolonged, overgrazing by refugee herds and the felling of trees for firewood could cause an economic decline that would increase antirefugee sentiment. As the refugees come to see themselves as permanent residents, competition for political power could also become a problem. Baluch tribesmen, for example, fear that Pushtun refugees will join the large number of Pakistani Pushtuns in Baluchistan Province and seize political control. If the refugees become a serious economic burden or if tensions between refugees and Pakistanis cause serious civil disorders, we believe Islamabad would be more amenable to an arrangement with Kabul and Moscow that facilitated the return of the refugees and ended Pakistani support for the resistance. Should many of the refugees nevertheless remain in 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX 7 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85TOO287ROO1301030001-5 Pakistan, as we believe likely, the task of integrating them into Pakistani society would be difficult, and Islamabad might be saddled with a permanent refugee community. 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX 8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85TOO287ROO1301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 ur ecunc AFGHANISTAN: CHANGING INSURGENT DYNAMICS The failure of the Soviets or their Afghan allies to quell the resistance movement that began in 1978 has allowed time for the beginning of a more modern and durable insurgency. Studies of a number of tribal insurrections during this century suggest that Afghanistan's tribal and ethnic groups were vulnerable to a quick defeat because of traditional leadership problems, feuds, and economic hardships. The Soviets and the regime were unable to defeat the mujahedin because they committed too few resources to the fray, however, and now they will have to undertake the arduous task of building a body of supporters who can regain control of key rural areas. Their success in this endeavor is not inevitable. In the years ahead they will face better organized and better trained insurgents who will be more aware of the need for a coherent political organization. A Rising of the Tribes The war in Afghanistan has undergone major changes since the initial uprising against the Marxist regime in 1978. -- The rebellion at first was a tribal insurgency*, a mass uprising of various tribal and ethnic groups led by political and religious leaders who used traditional methods and institutions to mobilize the rural population. *The term "tribal insurgency" is used here only as an identifying term. Most of the Afghan insurgents cannot be called "tribal." Many are linked by ethnic origin yet have lived in a religious-feudal structure one evolutionary step above tribalism. The severe, mountainous terrain was the dominant factor leading to the development of the numerous Afghan groups and continues to inhibit the formation of a regional identity. 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX 25X1 25X1 9 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 -- As is usually the case in tribal insurgencies, the rebellion was initially very successful. The local leaders quickly gained control of much of the rural area where the regime's security forces and administrative structures were rapidly eliminated. -- Government forces had neither sufficient discipline nor training to fight more than a few bands at a time. Conscripted soldiers displayed low morale and growing reluctance to fight their own Muslim countrymen on behalf of a Communist regime. By late 1979 resistance forces were poised to capture major urban areas. The Soviet invasion and the coup d'etat in Kabul led to a new phase in the insurgency. -- As a result of more vigorous government and Soviet ground operations and frequent air strikes, some communities suffered considerable damage, and local institutions came under severe pressures. -- Faced with persistent retaliation--especially airstrikes--and economic hardships, hundreds of thousands of Afghans fled to Pakistan or Iran. -- Some leaders responded to these pressures with informal accommodations and laissez-faire policies with the Communist forces. A considerable number of tribesmen are determined to continue the fight, but they have trouble mounting a coherent threat to the regime. -- Weaknesses in local leadership make ,it difficult to create a cohesive force or pursue sustained objectives. -- Manpower usually cannot be spared from economic activities for long periods; some groups fear heavy casualties that would make it even more difficult to sustain agricultural production. 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX 10 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 i ur StUl1 T -- Rivalries among tribes, clans, and religious and political factions result in bloody bickering and hinder effective military coordination between groups. The Soviets and their Afghan allies, however, have failed to take advantage of these basic weaknesses. punitive actions by modern military forces an t e limitations of tribal societies normally cause a steep decline .in insurgent control after the initial success. In Afghanistan, the Soviets and the Kabul regime simply had too few troops and supporters to return to the countryside and begin measures to win public support. Towards a More Lethal Insurgency It now appears that the Afghan insurgents, under military pressures from the Soviet Union, are going through a transitional phase. -- The destruction of local institutions in areas of intense military pressure has resulted, in some cases, in the development of more modern rural insurgencies with nontribal organizational features. -- In other areas, such as the Panjsher Valley, local leaders seem to have acceded to Westernized commanders who have demonstrated military leadership. We believe, based on studies of previous insurgencies, that the transition phase may last several years. -- As long as some local groups maintain their traditional organizations and leaders, they may come to some accommodations with the Soviet-supported regime if the latter can develop a more flexible political approach along with a more effective army. -- A large number of local groups have been so severely defeated or their economic bases so shattered that their traditional institutions no longer exist and accommodation is almost impossible. -- Tribesmen from this category form the bulk of the rural refugees in Pakistan and Iran. 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121 CX SOVA M 84-10042CX 25X1 25X1 25X1 11 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 -- Tribesmen who have elected to remain in Afghanistan and resist the government, however, are likely over time to become part of larger groups with more modern organizational structure. Overcoming longstanding ethnic rivalries will be difficult, but Masood's success in forging alliances in the northeast suggests that the task is not impossible. Looking Ahead--Elusive Soviet Success We believe that as nontribal, nonlocal insurgent organizations develop, the Soviets will find it more difficult either to reach an accommodation with individual insurgent groups or to destroy them. A key factor will be the effectiveness of the "new" insurgents in creating disciplined and coherent organizations. -- As the transition progresses, other key elements will be the ability of new groups to retain and gain local sympathizers and committed supporters and to mobilize public opinion in opposition to government programs and tactics. -- Key points for the government will be its ability to build responsive local political organizations, to avoid self- defeating punitive expeditions against rural populations, and to develop better motivated armed forces from new and younger recruits. 20 March 1984 NESA M 84-10121CX SOVA M 84-10042CX 12 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5 Top Secret Top Secret Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/04/04: CIA-RDP85T00287R001301030001-5