(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
January 12, 2017
Document Release Date: 
May 18, 2011
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 17, 1983
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4.pdf357.73 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 Central Intelligence Agency DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE 17 March 1983 China and the Asian Development Bank Summary China's recent decision to request membership in the Asian Development Bank--and to demand Taiwan's expulsion--injects another note of contention into US-China relations. Beijing appears in no mood to compromise. Indeed, by publicly scoring the US stand on the issue, the Chinese seem intent on pressing the United States and other ADB members to demonstrate their adherence to a one China policy. Taiwan will not withdraw from the bank voluntarily. It has even indicated it is willing to remain a member if Beijing joins--the first time Taipei has acceded, even in principle, to dual membership in any international political or finanacial institution. If that ploy fails, Taiwan is likely to invoke the Taiwan Relations Act increasingly to induce the United States to support its position against China. Japan and other bank members, meanwhile, are temporizing. Although they have told Beijing they will support China's bid for ADB membership, we believe they hope the United States will devise a means for Taiwan to remain in the bank. If Beijing rejects a reasonable US compromise proposal, we believe some bank This memorandum was prepared by the China Division and the Northeast Asia Division of the Office of East Asian Analysis. EA M 83-10051 25X1 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 SECRET members might reduce or drop their support for Beijing's membership. Background The ADB was established in 1966 to provide financial and technical assistance to the developing countries of the Asian and Pacific region. Korea, Pakistan, and the ASEAN countries have been the bank's major borrowers. There are now 31 regional and 14 non-Asian member states (see annex). The bank is set up like the World Bank to provide both hard and soft loans. A subsidary, the Asian Development Fund (ADF), for example, provides 40-year loans to the region's poorest countries with a service charge of only 1 percent. The bank's ordinary loans are currently offered at an 11 percent interest rate. As of 31 December 1982 the bank's authorized capital was $8 billion while the fund had $3.6 billion in cumulative resources. Since its founding the bank has provided $8 billion in hard loans and $3.5 billion in soft loans. The US contribution to the bank last year was $134 Taiwan is a founding member of the bank and last borrowed from it in 1971. In fact, it currently owes the bank only $42 million and last year contributed $2 million to the ADF. Unlike its previous membership in,the UN and the World Bank, Taipei's membership, capital share, vote, and loans at the ADB are based generally on Taiwan's economy and population, rather than all of Why China Wants to Join Beijing initially sought ADB membership to gain access to additional international financing and to remove Taiwan from the bank. We believe it thought it could simply replace Taiwan as it had in the World Bank. When it became clear by January, however, that Taiwan would fight to retain its seat and that other ADB members were not in favor of Taiwan's expulsion, the matter took on increased political importance for Beijing. Indeed, we believe the Chinese now view their quest for membership primarily as a way of forcing the United States and other key ADB members to demonstrate their commitment to a one-China policy. To win support and allay concern that China could become a drain on the bank's resources, Beijing has begun to reassure some bank members that it will take the ADB's limited assets into account in applying for loans. China's inability to obtain adequate World Bank assistance influenced its original decision to join the ADB. Beijing joined the World Bank in 1980, too late to take advantage of the last replenishment of the bank's soft loan subsidiary--the International Development Association (IDA). As a result, it has obtained only $460 million in World Bank loans so far. 2 SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 SECRET China's growing rivalry with India for international development loans also played a pabroke a gentlemen's agreement F_ I with the ADB not to seek ADB funds. To avoid the problems it encountered at the World Bank, Beijing decided to apply for ADB membership before the bank approved its next general capital increase for the 1983-87 period. As a result, China began sounding out ADB members last fall and on the basis of a generally favorable reaction made formal demarches to bank members in November. In January, when the United States and Japan expressed only qualified support for China's position--i.e., refused to support explicitly China's demand for Taiwan's ouster--and Taiwan began to campaign for support, Beijing. demanded Taiwan's expulsion as a precondition for China's joining the bank. In early February, Chinese officials told Secretary Shultz that they were disappointed with the United States for not issuing a clear unequiviocal statement of support for China's membership and Taiwan's explusion. On 8 March China went further and for the first time publicly criticized the United States position as being inconsistent with the Sino-US communiques of 1978 and 1982. The Chinese Foreign Ministry's press spokesman accused the US of "laying obstacles" to China's admission. Several days later, a Foreign Ministry official used a meeting with US embassy officials on another topic to underscore Chinese unhappiness with the US position. In late February, China formally notified the ADB of its plans to join the bank and requested the bank take immediate action to terminate Taiwan's membership. Chinese officials have indicated that they would like to begin consultations with the bank, but have suggested that the ADB initiate this move. The ADB's president indicated that he would have to seek the guidance of the bank's board of directors. The board is scheduled to meet informally with its general counsel on 22 March to discuss the issue before possibly taking up the request at its annual meeting in early May. Taiwan's Gamble The ADB is the only remaining international financial or political organization of which Taiwan is a member. Taiwan has raised no objections to China joining the ADB, presumably banking on a Chinese refusal to accept joint membership. At the same time, Taipei is trying to enlist US support, arguing that the Taiwan Relations Act precludes US recognition of Beijing from being used as a basis for expelling Taiwan from any international organization. Thus far, officials in Taiwan have refused to entertain other compromise solutions, such as changing its name in the ADB 3 SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 SECRET to "China, Taipei," as it did. in order to remain a member of the International Olympics Committee. In late January, following an emergency Taiwan cabinet meeting, Taiwan officials also told US representatives in Taipei that Taiwan would not accept unofficial association with the bank. Regional Reactions Japan and most other ADB members have told Beijing that they will support China's request for admission, despite their concern that China could become a drain on the bank's resources. / Most bank members appear to be hoping the United States will be able to devise a compromise that would allow Taiwan to remain in the bank. Japan, which is the ADB's leading contributor, faces an especially uncomfortable dilemma. In our opinion, Tokyo does not want to damage its recently improved relations with Beijing, which soured briefly last year during the textbook controversy. But neither,does it want to anger Taiwan, with which Japan has lucrative trading ties, or upset the pro-Taiwan lobby in the Diet.P Korea, Australia, and Canada also have expressed their support for China's membership in the bank to Beijing but they would like to see Taiwan continue to play a role if that can be arranged. Korea has assured Taiwan of its support but added it will not lobby other ADB members on Taiwan's behalf. Like Japan, Australia has avoided taking a position on Taiwan's expulsion. Canada has suggested that it might work out a joint approach with the United States to handle China's admission. Is Compromise Possible?. The current atmosphere in US-China and US-Taiwan-'relations makes the working out of any compromise more difficult than in the past. Beijing is convinced that the United States is only paying lip-service to a one China policy, while Taipei is more confident of US support than it has been in years. Having turned the ADB issue into yet another test of US policy, therefore, the Chinese are unlikely to agree quickly to a compromise, if at all. Nor will Taiwan easily accede to a downgrading of its 4 SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 SECRET status in the bank--the only way we can see for both to belong to the ADB. Still, a compromise may be possible. The Chinese have stressed that their main concern is that the ADB--and especially the United States--acknowledge that Beijing represents China. Hence, they will almost certainly demand, at a minimum, that Taipei lose its official voting status. Beijing might then be more amenable to Taiwan's continued participation in the bank in a noncountry status, similiar to Hong Kong. Although Taiwan has publicly rejected such a solution, it has hinte it might agree to an arrangement similiar to the one that permitted Taiwan to remain in the IOC as "China, Taipei." 5 SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 SECRET SUBJECT: China and the Asian Development Bank Distribution: National Security Council 1 - Gaston Sigur, Senior Staff Member for Asia and Pacific Department of State 1 - Honorable Paul Wolfowitz - Asst. Sec. for East Asian and Pacific Affairs 1 - William F. Rope, Director, Office of Chinese Affairs, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs 1 - Wever Gim, Director, Office of Analysis for East Asia and the Pacific, Bureau of Intelligence and Research 1 - Donald Ferguson, Advisor, Taiwan Coordination Staff, EA/RA Department of Treasury 1 - Doug Mulholland - Intelligence Liaison Office 1 - Patsy Haas, Office of East-West Policy 1 - Rob Cox - Office of Multilateral Development Banks Department of Commerce 1 - David Peterson, Office of Intelligence Liaison Office of the U.S. Trade Representative 1 - John E. Ray, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative 1 - William Triplett, Director, East-West Affairs DIA 1 - Charles DeSaulnier - DIO - DIA Central Intelligence Agency DDI NIO/EA Chief, China DDO D/NIC PDB FBIS/Analysis Group/China FBIS/Near East, Asia, Africa Division/China Economy Branch OCR/EA D/OEA Chief/China Division OEA/CH/DEV OEA/CH/DOM 6 SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 SECRET 1 - OEA/CH/FOR 1 - OEA/CH/DEF 5 - OCO/IMB/CB 7 SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 ADB Subscriptions and Voting Power by Country REGIONAL Country Subscribed Shares Percent of Total Voting Po wer Afghanistan 1,195 0 578 Australia 49,937 . 6 024 Bangladesh 8,812 . 1.429 Bhutan 110 0 457 Burma 4,700 . 0 969 Cambodia 875 . 0.542 China, Republic of 9,400 1 494 Cook Islands 23 . 0 447 Fiji 587 . 0 510 Hong Kong 4,708 . 0 969 India 54,637 . 6 549 Indonesia 47,000 . 5 696 Japan 117,500 . 13 573 Kiribati 35 . 0 448 Korea, Republic of 43,475 . 5 302 Laos 246 . 0 472 Malaysia 23,500 . 3 070 Maldives 35 . 0 448 Nepal 1,269 . 0 586 New Zealand 13,254 . 1 926 Pakistan 18,800 . 2 545 Papua New Guinea 810 . 0 535 Philippines 20,562 . 2 742 Singapore 2,937 . 0 773 Solomon Islands 58 . 0 451 Sri Lanka 5,005 . 1 003 Thai land 11,750 . 1 757 Tongo 35 . 0 448 Vanuatu 58 . 0 451 Viet Nam 6,038 . 119 1 Western Samoa 58 . 0.451 TOTAL REGIONAL 447,401 63.764 NON-REGIONAL United States 117,500 13 573 Austria 2,937 . 0.773 Belgium 2,937 0 773 Canada 45,143 . 5 488 Denmark 2,937 . 0 773 Finland 1,175 . 0 576 France 14,687 . 2.085 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4 Country Germany, Fed. Pep. of Italy Netherlands Norway Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom TOTAL NON-REGIONA(. TOTAL Subscribed Shares Percent of Total Voting Power 37,334 4.615 11,750 1.757 6,46? 1.166 2,937 0.773 1,175 0.576 4,037 0.895 17 )625 2.413 268,636 36.236 716,037 100.000 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/18: CIA-RDP85T00287R000400870001-4