PHILIPPINES: PROSPECTS FOR VIOLENT OPPOSITION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00287R000101630001-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 7, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 15, 1980
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00287R000101630001-2.pdf103.88 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/07: CIA-RDP85T00287R000101630001-2 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY NATIONAL FOREIGN ASSESSMENT CENTER 15 July 1980 Philippines: Prospects for Violent Opposition 25X1 S UMMARY Members of the non-Communist opposition, frustrated over their inability to influence the political situation, are becoming more vocal about using violent tactics against President Marcos' regime. Prominent Marcos opponent former Senator Aquino recently suggested for the first time that he too is giving up nonviolent means. Aquino's assertion may be designed to prevent further erosion of his influence within opposition circles and to nut nrAssure on Marcos to seek an The Non-Communist Opposition Most leaders of the non-Communist opposition are politicians from pre-martial-law days. They have little popularity as an alternative to Marcos because the public believes the primary difference between them and Marcos is that they are out of power while he is in. The non- Communists are also handicapped by their inability to agree on commo7-an-,~ leadership, or organization for countering Marcos. In recent months, various prominent opposition members have talked more freely about the need for a coalition with leftists and the use of violent tactics. Thus far, we have no reports that this has gone beyond the discussion stage. The use of violence as a political tool was common in the Philippines prior to martial law, and it would not be out of character for Marcos' opponents to resort to this tactic if they concluded nonviolent methods were ineffective. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/07: CIA-RDP85T00287R000101630001-2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/07: CIA-RDP85T00287R000101630001-2 Urban terrorism, which requires neither sophisticated organization nor materials, would be well within the capability of the opposition, but random terrorist acts alone would not topple Marcos. Only a sustained campaign that could elicit other acts of antigovernment activity by a wide variety of groups would cause Marcos serious problems. It is not clear that enough members of the non- Communist opposition have either the will or the desire The Role of Senator Aquino Aquino, the most popular opposition figure, in the past argued in favor of nonviolent opposition. In early 1980, reports circulated in Manila that he was trying to negotiate an accommodation with Marcos. This tarnished his image among his opposition colleagues, who believed he was preparing to sell out to Marcos. Aquino's departure in May for medical treatment in the United States further undercut his influence with the opposition. 25X1 Aquino may have several motives for implying that he too has concluded violence now is necessary. If, as reported, his moderate colleagues are increasingly attracted to terrorism as a tactic, he probably would not want to foreclose this option and risk further undercutting his position as a leader. Aquino also may believe that Marcos will. be more inclined to accommodate his opponents if he concludes that widespread urban terrorism is likely. Moreover, He probably hopes that the US will be sufficiently concerned about threats of widespread violence to put pressure on Marcos to relax martial law regulations and to permit greater political participation. Like most Filipinos, Aquino tends to regard the United States as responsible for both the cause and the solution of whatever problem arises in the Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/07: CIA-RDP85T00287R000101630001-2