USSR SEEKS TO BUILD ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY WITH EMBARGOED WESTERN MACHINERY
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP85T00176R000900010007-0
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
16
Document Creation Date:
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date:
March 26, 2007
Sequence Number:
7
Case Number:
Publication Date:
January 1, 1976
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP85T00176R000900010007-0.pdf | 1.22 MB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
Secret
USSR Seeks to Build Advanced Semiconductor Industry
With Embargoed Western Machinery
Secret
ER 76-10057
January 1976
Copy No. I I
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
1. The USSR is engaged in a major effort to build a large, modem
semiconductor industry using embargoed US and Japanese equipment. Moscow will
want to use the newly acquired equipment to accelerate development of more
advanced military electronics systems where higher reliability, lower weight, smaller
volume, and lower power requirements are crucial. Such systems could be used
in strategic missiles, space communications and reconnaissance systems,
antisubmarine warfare detection systems, and cryptographic equipment.
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
USSR SEEKS TO BUILD ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR
INDUSTRY WITH EMBARGOED WESTERN MACHINERY
2. Semiconductors are solid state electronic devices, the most advanced of
which are called integrated circuits. These are of major importance in improving
advanced weapons systems and sophisticated industrial processes. Current Soviet
production is less than 2% of the US level in volume and even further behind
in state-of-the-art. Most Soviet military electronic systems are still based on
obsolescent transistor or tube technologies, and output of modern third-generation
data processing computers is lagging badly behind planned goals.
3. Since 1973, Moscow has purchased about $40 million worth of machinery
and equipment for the manufacture of semiconductors, much of it the most
advanced available. About two thirds of the purchases were from Japan
One-third of the equipment
is of US origin, purchased through third parties (often dummy corporations) in
Western Europe. The equipment that Moscow has ordered covers nearly the entire
range of processes in an integrated, modem semiconductor industry. The equipment
already delivered gives Moscow the capability to produce, at least on a small scale,
more complex circuits than currently are in production in the USSR.
4. Although most of the equipment ordered has probably been delivered,
US export control authorities have been advised of the Soviet acquisitions and
Note: This publication was prepared by the Office of Economic Research with
helpful research fro the Office of Scientific Intelligence. Comments
and queries regarding this publication are welcomed. They may be directed to
the Office of Economic Research
25X1
25X1
are holding up certain items that are critical to the operation of automated handling
and environmental control systems in the manufacture of integrated circuits.
5. The USSR has not yet acquired the manufacturing technology to make
effective use of the purchased equipment. In an ambitious scheme to obtain such
technology, the Soviets are searching for a West European partner in a joint venture
for semiconductor research, development, and production. The partner would hire
US experts to train West Europeans who, in turn, would train Soviet engineers
and managers. If the USSR acquires all the equipment that has been ordered, and
comprehensive manufacturing know-how and training as planned, it may be able
to produce hundreds of millions of a diversified mix of ICs annually.
Background
6. For many years, the Soviets have purchased, or have attempted to
purchase, embargoed semiconductor production machinery.' Prior to 1973,
however, such purchases were piecemeal and few. Some attempts were made to
purchase complete integrated circuit (IC) lines or IC plants outside legal channels,
but we do not believe that they were successful. Generally, the Soviets did not
acquire or even seek associated "know-how" - the special processing techniques
needed to effectively use Western-made equipment - and relied instead on their
own installation, maintenance, repair, and operator training.'
7. During these formative years of IC manufacturing, the Soviets seemed
determined to make it on their own - to buy some items of crucially needed
equipment such as bonders and diffusion furnaces in the West and to copy others
(Japanese probe testers) but to use Soviet-made equipment and Soviet technology
wherever possible. Thus, most Soviet plants combine a few items of Western
equipment with mostly indigenous machinery.
8. The- sporadic acquisition of Western equipment, by filling crucial gaps
in the production process, probably permitted the USSR to get ICs into production
somewhat earlier than would have been possible otherwise. However, we believe
prototype
1. Semiconductors are electronic components that generally have replaced vacuum tubes as the basic building
blocks of electronic equipment. Major types of semiconductors are transistors, diodes, and, in their most
advanced form, integrated circuits.
2. The only known major exception is the case of the Soviet "Zond" probe tester, copied from a Japanese
2
SECRET
that the overall impact on Soviet production capabilities was not large. Western
equipment alone could not compensate for the deficiencies in Soviet-made
equipment, backward production technology, and the almost total lack of quality
and environmental control in Soviet plants. By 1973, after about four years of
production experience, the Soviets were able to produce only relatively simple
small-scale integration (SSI) bipolar devices of poor quality, and yields were low.
The gap in semiconductor technology between the USSR and the United States
was large and growing, with the United States moving rapidly into the production
of high-density devices.
9. We believe that up to 1973 the Soviets were producing mostly simple
types of semiconductors (transistors and diodes) based on germanium material; the
transition to silicon technology, and to the production of advanced types of devices
including integrated circuits based on silicon, had been moving slowly. Thus, the
USSR produced only about 10 million ICs in 1972, less than 2% of US output3
(estimated at more than 700 million units). We believe that the Soviets were able
to achieve even this low level of output only through the application of large
manpower resources, through the use of inefficient trial and error methods, and
with stolen or clandestinely acquired Western designs for devices..
10. The Soviets were unhappy with the lack of progress in IC development
and production and in 1973 apparently decided to seek large-scale Western help.
V.G. Kolesnikov,? First Deputy Minister of the Electronics Industry (MEP), and
head of ti its 2d Main Administration responsible for all semiconductor development
and production, toured the United States and Western Europe, met with leading
semiconductor developers and producers, and assessed Western state-of-the-art.
Kolesnikov's trip apparently signaled the start of a major effort to acquire Western
equipment and technology on a systematic scale.
11. In 1973 and 1974 the Soviets began to seek through illegal channels
sizable quantities of machinery, including the most advanced available. Moreover,
they began to seek complete systems, rather than discrete items of equipment,
3. Soviet IC output probably is still less than 2% that of the United States. In 1974, we estimate that
the USSR produced less than 30 million ICs, compared with 1.5 billion in the United States
4. V.G. Kolesnikov rose to power rapidly. He was promoted from Director of the Vorenezh Radio Parts
Plant - to our knowled e e f ever to manufacture ICs in the USSR - to First Deputy Minister in
less than a year (1971).
3
SECRET
roved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
25
25
25
25
and launched an ambitious scheme to obtain "know-how" and training (see
paragraph 23). In addition, they initiated efforts to acquire huge plant capacity
for the production of silicon. Since 1974 the Soviets have shown a readiness to
spend very large sums of money, at least $100 million, for semiconductor
production machinery, technological assistance, and a semiconductor materials
plant.
Recent Equipment Purchases
12. Reliable sources report that the USSR since 1973 has purchased
embargoed semiconductor production machinery and equipment valued at about
$40 million. About 70% of the purchases have been delivered to date, 16% are
in process of delivery, and the remaining 14% are being held up by US authorities
who have been made aware of the illicit nature of these orders.
13. The scope of recent purchases is shown in Figure 1, which breaks down
semiconductor manufacturing into five major processes - materials preparation,
mask-making, device fabrication, assembly, and testing - and 14 major
sub-operations. The dollar value of those purchases is shown in the table and
Figure 2. It is evident that Moscow is trying to build an entire modem industry
from imported equipment. Details of individual transactions are described in the
Appendix.
USSR: Value of Soviet Purchases of Embargoed
Semiconductor Production Equipment,' 1973-75
Value of
Equipment Share of Purchases (Percent)
Manufacturing (Million Total
Operation US $) (Percent) Completed In Process Held-Up?
Total
41.2
100
70
16
14
Crystal growth'
16.3
39
100
....
....
Photolithography3
9.9
24
15
69
16
Diffusion3
7.7
19
100
Mask-making
4.6
11
26
....
74
Testing3
1.5
4
100
Epitaxy
1.2
3
42
....
58
1. For details of Soviet purchases and attempted purchases, see Tables A-1 and A-2.
2. By US authorities.
3. Additional sales are expected in 1975; they are not included in this table (see Table A-1).
4
SECRET
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
USSR: Value of Soviet Purchases Figure 2
of Embargoed Semiconductor Production Equipment, 1973-75
Million US $
Crystal Photo- Diffusion Mask-
Growth lithography Making
568361 1-j6 C*
Held up
In process
Completed
14. Recent purchases cover almost entirely two major semiconductor
manufacturing processes: mask-making and device fabrication. Together, these
processes constitute "front-end" processing - that is, they include the operations
required for the actual fabrication of semiconductor elements. The single front-end
operation not covered by recent purchases is metallization.5
15. The front-end processing capability that has been acquired by the USSR
is of extraordinary interest since it could enable the Soviets to move rapidly into
at least small-scale production of more advanced, higher density types of circuits
than currently are in production.6
5. Process of laying down the interconnection paths.
.b. The critical factors in producing new types of circuits are making the masks and transferring the new
design chemically (photolithography) onto the epitaxial layer.
6
SECRET
pprove or a ease 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85T00176R000900010007-0
16. Known orders include equipment for only about half of all the operations
involved in semiconductor manufacturing. In particular, recent purchases do not
include any equipment for assembly, with the exception of two specialized bonders
(see the Appendix, paragraph 9), or for intermediate (probe) testing. These
operations normally require large quantities of equipment. For large-scale
manufacturing, the Soviets require several hundred conventional bonders of the
chip and wire type and a large number of probe testers for use on-line in various
stages of the manufacturing process.
Suspected Purchases
17. Moscow may have already filled some of these gaps through earlier
acquisition of equipment for metallization, bonding, and probe testing although
the evidence is not conclusive.
? Metallization equipment (evaporators) may have been acquired from
Switzerland. A firm in Switzerland, which has sold evaporators to Poland
and has been pushing sales in other Communist countries as well, has
had dealings with the USSR.
? Bonding equipment may have been acquired from the United States
through Yugoslavia. The United States authorized the export of 90
bonders to Yugoslavia, which have never been satisfactorily accounted
for. Suspicion that some (or all) of these bonders might have been
reexported to the USSR arises because: Yugoslavia is known to have
signed a trade protocol that calls for the export of semiconductor
manufacturing equipment to the USSR; Yugoslavia does not itself
manufacture semiconductor production equipment; and Yugoslavia is
known to have diverted some US electronics equipment to the USSR.
? Finally, the USSR may now bet serially producing its own probe testers
based on technology acquired from Japan. However, that technology is
now obsolete and, unless up-dated by the Soviets or aided by follow-on
technology from Japan, may still be inadequate for modern
high-productivity semiconductor production.
Attempted Purchases
18. Currently, the USSR is attempting to acquire equipment and technology
for the entire materials preparation process. Negotiations are under way with two
7
SECRET
Approved For Release 2
West German firms and one US firm for a turn-key plant to produce polycrystalline
silicon with minimum capacity of 400 metric tons per year. The plant also is to
produce monocrystalline silicon in unspecified quantities. The projected output of
polycrystalline silicon would be equivalent to at least 200 tons of silicon starting
material.7
19. At present, silicon production in the USSR is small. Hard evidence
suggests that the total amount of monocrystalline silicon presently available from
domestic sources for the production of semiconductors is on the order of 17 tons
annually. By comparion, US consumption of monocrystalline silicon in 1974 was
about 360 tons.
20. In addition, the Soviets are attempting to buy slicers for the silicon
production process from the United States through normal export channels. Two
US firms recently requested authorization from the Department of Commerce to
export a total of 90 slicing machines valued at $2.7 million. That number of slicers
would be more than adequate to slice 200 tons of monocrystalline silicon per
year.
21. It thus appears that every major semiconductor operation except one
(scribing) is covered by an actual purchase, a suspected purchase, or an attempted
purchase (see Figure 1).
22. Beyond acquiring equipment for particular processes, the USSR has not
yet acquired the "know-how" to tie the various operations and processes together
in an efficient manner.
Manufacturing Technology (Know-How)
23. The Soviets are going to unusual lengths to obtain IC production
technology. They would like to set up a joint production venture in a non-COCOM
country to circumvent embargo controls on technology; the Soviets have mentioned
Sweden, Austria, and Switzerland. Moscow would underwrite the cost of building
an R&D and pilot production facility costing $30 to $40 million. The Soviets
hope that within five years the plant would have a capability to develop and produce
across the whole spectrum of semiconductor and IC devices, including some military
devices.'
7. Roughly two tons of polycrystalline silicon yield one ton of monocrystalline silicon.
8, Specifically, the plant would be able to produce large-scale integration metal-oxide semiconductors
(LSI/MOS) (P-channel), LSI/CMOS, light-emitting diodes, liquid-crystal displays, bipolar ICs, bipolar discretes,
MOS (N-channel) discretes and LSI, silicon-on-sapphire, and power devices.
8
SECRET
Abi~roved For Release 200~TU03/26 CIA-RDP85TOO 1768000900010007-0
24. The West European partner in the venture would hire US experts to
manage the facility and to train West European engineers and technicians; these,
in turn, would train Soviet engineers and managers, presumably in the USSR.
Discussions are now going on with two or more firms, one of which is in the
United States.
25. The USSR also is seeking to acquire manufacturing technology from
COCOM member countries in a much more limited and less systematic way through
student exchanges9 and visits to industrial facilities. Although student exchanges
are not new, the USSR has been steadily increasing its emphasis on research in
the United States on semiconductors. During the past two years, visits of Soviet
specialists have expanded greatly under S&T agreements with private firms in the
West; these visits have been used to learn about Western manufacturing processses
and also to promote the sale of technology from the West to the USSR. For
example, acting under an S&T agreement with Nippon Electric of Japan, the Soviets
broached the question of buying a complete plant for the production of LSI devices.
Origin
26. The largest share of Soviet equipment purchases - about two-thirds by
value - originated in Japan. These are mainly diffusion furnaces, crystal growth
equipment, and testers for advanced types of ICs. This equipment apparently was
shipped directly from Japan to the USSR.
27. About one-third of the equipment is of US origin and has been ordered
by third parties in Western Europe. Often the third party is a legitimate West
European firm acting on behalf of a dummy West European corporation set up
specifically to carry out illicit purchases of semiconductor production machinery
in the West for the USSR. Dummy corporations exist in several West European
countries, most of them directed by the same officials. In some cases, US goods
are shipped directly to the legitimate West European firm, routed on to the dummy
corporation, and transshipped from there to the USSR. In other cases, US goods
are shipped successively to several locations and then recrated and remarked to
create the appearance. of a legitimate shipment to the USSR. It is not known
whether US suppliers are witting of the Soviet connection.
28. The United States is supplying all of the equipment for the mask-making
process and for two major manufacturing operations - epitaxy and
9. Most Soviet S&T students in the United States are experienced professionals, rather than students in
the strict meaning of the term.
9
SECRET
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85T00176R000900010007-0
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
SECRET
photolithography. Some of the equipment for each of these areas has already been
shipped. That which is being held up includes more than two-thirds (in units) of
the mask-making machines, nearly all of the epitaxy equipment (10 out of 13
units), and a.large amount of photolithography equipment. The potential signifi-
cance of equipment being held up is discussed below (see paragraph 31).
Potential Impact of Equipment Purchases on Production
29. With equipment already delivered, the Soviets could achieve at least
moderate increases in output and product mix early in the Tenth Five-Year Plan
period (1976-80). However, we expect the Soviets to have difficulty getting any
large amount of new capacity activated because of stringent environmental
requirements, lack of production experience in the use of advanced Western
equipment, and shortages of qualified personnel
30. If the USSR acquires all the equipment that has been ordered, plus
manufacturing know-how and training, it may be able to produce a diversified
mix of IC devices on the order of hundreds of millions of units annually, including
many advanced types of ICs that are now produced only in small lots or not
at all. This capability would elevate the USSR to the status of a major world
producer of ICs, trailing only Japan and the United States.
will be unable to use most of the automated handling systems purchased for the
photolithographic process, since the systems are designed to be complementary.
ordered. Indeed, if the chemical systems are not shipped, the Soviets probably
A critical bottleneck will . arise in the chemical processing phase of the
photolithographic process for which the USSR has only two of the ten systems
unless all of the equipment now being held up in the United States is received.
manufacturing lines for ICs.' ? They may be limited to only two lines, however,
31. The Soviets apparently are planning .to establish nine complete
32. If Moscow can acquire the needed complementary equipment, the nine
lines would have the theoretical capacity to produce up to one billion simple -
low-density (SSIs) - ICs of Soviet design annually," more than 30 times current
Soviet output. Although the USSR will want to produce large quantities of simple
types of SSI ICs, because such devices can satisfy most of their current design
10. Based on the quantity of photolithographic equipment that has been purchased.
11. Assuming operations 5 days a week on two shifts (16 hours) at the minimum rate of throughput capacity
specified by the Soviets and a 20% yield of usable product.
10
SECRET
requirements, we believe they also will want to expand the product mix to include
both medium-density (MSIs) and high-density (LSIs) devices. The purchased
equipment is capable of producing many of the most advanced types of ICs now
in production in the West, but Soviet capabilities will be limited by the state of
their manufacturing technology. Without Western technology, the Soviets probably
will be limited to the production of medium-density devices of the bipolar type,
linear circuits, and the least complex types of high-density MOS circuits.
33. Ultimately, the output of ICs that can be achieved using the purchased
equipment will depend on the product mix and on efficient equipment utilization.
Both productivity and yields can be expected to fall as the mix shifts toward
higher density devices. Efficient utilization will require proper installation,
operation, maintenance, and integration of the equipment throughout the entire
production process.
34. By the 1980s the Soviets apparently are hoping to build a capability
in IC production capacity and technology approaching the current US level.
Achievement of this goal will depend on Soviet success in acquiring Western
technical assistance of the type envisioned in the proposed joint venture in a
non-COCOM country. The long-range goal may also depend on Soviet success in
acquiring 400-ton capacity for polycrystalline silicon production. Such large
capacity would take 6 to 7 years to install. The long lead times for the acquisition
of know-how and the installation of silicon capacity make it unlikely that the
USSR can reach current US levels of semiconductor output before the mid-1980s
at the earliest.
Some Implications
35. Moscow can be expected to attach the highest priority to the use of
ICs in the production of military electronics equipment. According to
knowledgeable sources, 70% to 90% of the ICs produced in the USSR in past
years, including all of the best circuits, have been delivered to producers of military
equipment. Even so, most Soviet military electronics systems still use transistor
or tube technology and are in need of modernization.
36. The Soviets could choose to use newly developed ICs in future strategic
missile systems. The use of ICs makes possible a more complex guidance system,
a more powerful computer, and improved reliability while reducing the size and
weight of the entire electronics package. In the United States, the development
of a complex guidance system based on ICs has made an important contribution
to increasing the accuracy of Minuteman II and to the introduction of MIRVs
on Minuteman III.
37. However, ICs in these applications have special requirements such as
hardening against radiation. Although purchased equipment can be used to produce
even these ICs, unconventional processing techniques and specialized know-how
also would be needed.
38. Purchased equipment also is capable of producing ICs that will meet a
wide range of other military requirements. These include: most ground support
equipment, tactical weapons such as antiaircraft and antitank missiles, artillery fire
control systems, and most communications systems for aircraft.
39. The Soviets can be expected to place strong emphasis on the development
of complex MOS/LSI circuits for microprocessors. In the United States,
microprocessors are now being designed into a wide variety of US military hardware,
including airborne inertial guidance, antisubmarine warfare systems, and airborne
radars with a look-down capability.
40. In the civil sector, the USSR urgently requires modern ICs to improve
its ailing computer industry. Although some third-generation RYAD family
computers are now in serial production, output is far behind plan, and advanced
models in the family, which require advanced types of ICs, still are apparently
in the prototype stage.' 2 We believe that the USSR would want to use some of
the capability of imported Western equipment and technology to satisfy the
requirements of the computer industry. This could be done without jeopardizing
support of military requirements only if the Soviets succeed in activating several
new IC production lines. Probably two lines would be needed to meet all current
and projected IC requirements for civilian computer and computer peripheral
programs during the next 5 years.
41. In addition, the USSR hopes to use ICs to modernize other types of
equipment for industry and commerce, including especially, communications
apparatus, electronic instruments, and numerical controllers for machine tools.
Output of IC-based electronic instruments and numerical controllers, in particular,
is to be pushed vigorously during 1976-80. According to recently published plan
12
SECRET
directives, "automatic equipment with small-dimension (i.e., ICs) electronic digital
program control is to develop at an accelerated rate"; and "new forms of
instruments based on the wide utilization of microelectronics (i.e., ICs) are to be
developed and produced."
42. The USSR also may wish to use ICs in watches and cameras now exported
to the West to earn foreign exchange. The growing use of ICs in Western electronic
watches and cameras will tend to make Soviet products noncompetitive unless they
incorporate modern IC design. Other lesser priority areas of civil electronics
production that could use ICs to produce better, more reliable products at lower
cost include consumer products produced in high volume for the domestic market
(radios and television receivers) and hand-held calculators. Production of hand-held
calculators based on complex IC technology could appear to the Soviets an effective
way of improving the efficiency of their vast army of planners and managers and
perhaps as another way of earning foreign exchange.
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0
Approved For Release 2007/03/26: CIA-RDP85TOO176R000900010007-0