SOVIET MOBILE MISSILE ACTIVITY 1 JULY - 30 SEPTEMBER 1984 SUMMARY REPORT 25

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: NGA Records (Formerly NIMA)
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP85T00060R000300720001-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: T
• Document Page Count: 64
• Document Creation Date: December 28, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 16, 2010
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: November 1, 1984
• Content Type: REPORT

Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T00060R000300720001-2
DEPLOYED STRATEGIC SSM FACILITIES
BE: Various
USSR
Top Secret
Soviet Mobile Missile Activity
1 July-30 September 1984
Summary Report 25 (S)
Basic Imagery Interpretation Report
Top Secret
RCA-01/0017/84
NOVEMBER 1984
Copy 67
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T00060R000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION
Unauthorized Disclosure Subject to Criminal Sanctions
NOFORN - Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals
NOCONTRACT - Not Releasable to Contractors or
Contractor/Consultants
PROPIN - Caution-Proprietary Information Involved
ORCON - Dissemination and Extraction of Information
Controlled by Originator
REL ... This Information has been Authorized for
Release to ...
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
SOVIET MOBILE MISSILE ACTIVITY
1 JULY-30 SEPTEMBER 1984
SUMMARY REPORT 25 (S)
i. This is the 25th in a series of quarterly reports prepared by NPIC on Soviet activities relevant to
development and deployment of Soviet offensive mobile missile systems judged to be of strategic
interest. (S/WN)
ii. The report has five substantive sections-Highlights and Late Developments, ICBM Activity,
IRBM Activity, SRBM Activity, and Related Activity. The Related Activity section provides information on
facilities of unidentified activities which NPIC believes may have a potential mobile missile association.
Ihis report also includes an appendix which contains the significant baseline information that NPIC
considers roost useful for Soviet mobile missile analysis. A list of acronyms and abbreviations also appears
in the appendix. (S/WN)
iii. Information in this report covers the period essentially from 1 July through 30 September 1984.
. Signr rcant activity
identified after the cutoff date has also been included under Late Developments, in the Highlights and
Late Developments section. This report updates the preceding summary report: RCA-
01/0014/84, Soviet Mobile Missile Activity, 1 April-30 June 1984, Summary Report 24 (S), Aug 84 (TOP
SECRET CODEWORDS~
iv. Comments and queries regarding this report are welcome. They may be directed to the NPIC
Mobile Missile Coordinator, or to the contributing analysts
identified in the appendix. If you would like to change the number of copies you receive or have any
other questions of distribution, please also call. (C)
-i
RCA-01/0017/84 Top Secret RUFI
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Highlights
and
Late Developments
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
LIDA
PLESETSK
LUTSK m.
, MOZYR
KOROSTEN USOVO
ROMNY YURYA
BRODV
SOKAL ~ BELOKOROVICHI
ZHITOMIR
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
HIGHLIGHTS
1. Highlights of this reporting period are summarized below (Figure 1):
Paragraph(s) Figure(s)
? The tenth, 11th, and 12th launches of the SS-X-25 at 5
Plesetsk were probably from a road-mobile TEL.
? A second type C single-bay garage was identified under 6
construction in the Missile Handling Facility
at Plesetsk.
? The 13th launch of an SS-X-24 was probably from 9-10 5
a rail-TEL.
? The Soviets continued the effective use of camouflage, 21-24
concealment, and deception related to the testing of the
SS-X-25 and SS-X-24.
? Type C single-bay garages were confirmed at Yurya 27 8
Mobile Base 6, indicating that it will probably
support the SS-X-25.
? The 51st through 56th SS-20 mobile missile bases were 36, 37, 49,
identified at Brody, Sokal, Barnaul, Kansk, Usovo, 51, 60, 68
and Belokorovichi, respectively.
? The nine single-bay garages at Yurya Mobile IRBM Base 3 57 16
were dismantled.
? The flight test program of the KY-15, the probable 79 19
follow-on to the SS-20, started at Kapustin Yar.
? A new-type TEL and a missile canister dolly probably 85-87 20 & 21
for the KY-15 were identified at Kapustin Yar.
? Modified hardened dome antennas, possibly for 43, 48
communicating with airborne command posts, were
at the Romny and Lutsk division command posts.
? A new type of satellite communications station, 39-40, 43, 56
designated Type E, was observed at the Mozyr, Romny,
and Lida division C3 facilities.
Related Activity
? Early indications of what may be SS-20 construction were 116-118
observed at Korosten, Zhitomir, and Kansk. (TSZ)
LATE DEVELOPMENTS
Kansk
the former Kansk possible SS-20 construction area was confirmed as a new
mobile missile base, possibly for the SS-20 IRBM. It has been designated Kansk Mobile Missile Base 4.
Tree clearing for at least five probable single-bay garages, two probable multibay garages, and a loop
road was identified in a pattern typical of mobile missile base construction. This construction area was
25X1
25X1
Akhtyrka
? SS-20 equipment consisting of 12 canvas-covered missile support vans and one proba-
ble canvas-covered TEL with training canister had arrived in the vehicle maintenance area of Akhtyrka
Mobile IRBM Base 2. Construction was continuing throughout the facility. The operations area was in
the late stages of construction, with all nine single-bay garages and three four-bay garages externally
complete. Open cable trenches remained evident throughout the operations area, and construction
materials/equipment remained in front of two of the four-bay garages. The C3 and support areas were
both in the late stages of construction. (S/WN)
RCA-0110017184 Top Secret RUFF
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
Krolevets
SS-20 equipment had arrived at Krolevets Mobile IRBM Base 2. The equipment, which
was located in two areas, consisted of at least ten probable missile support vans and one TEL with
training canister.
IThe TEL was in the support area.
Construction was continuing throughout the facility. In the operations area, all nine single-bay ga-
rages and all three four-bay garages were externally complete. However, modifications to the missile-
ready bunker were not complete, and paving blocks had not been installed at one of the major
intersections within the area. Construction throughout the rest of the base was in the late stages.
Yurya
one single-bay garage had been completely dismantled and
been partially dismantled. This is the second of the five operational SS-20 bases
at which single-bay garages have been dismantled.
garages at Mobile IRBM Base 3 were dismantled. (S/WN
Glazov
all nine
? Efforts to further conceal stored single-bay garage components were observed at Glazov Missile
Support Rear Depot At least five supports and one and possibly two new canvas covers
were placed across the stockpiled garage components
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
2bAl
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
20AI
Top Secret RUFF
a second garage had
in the Yurya complex
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Intercontinental Ballistic
Missile Activity
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
PAVLOGRAD
TAMBOV,
KAMENSK-
SHAKHTINSKIY
SUROVATIKHA
YURYA
YOSHKAR-OLA
FIGURE 2. LOCATIONS OF SOVIET MOBILE ICBM-ASSOCIATED FACILITIES
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE ACTIVITY
Introduction
2. This section of the report addresses activ-
ity related to the development, deployment, and
production of mobile intercontinental ballistic
missiles (Figure 2). Discussion covers the identifica-
tion of type C single-bay garages at Yurya Mobile
Missile Base 6; continued construction of the
mobile missile base at Yoshkar-Ola; additional
analysis of the possible rail-TEL for the SS-X-24; the
fourth launch of an SS-X-24 probably from a rail-
1-FL; and an update of the continued expansion of
the two probable ICBM-associated solid motor
production facilities at Kamensk-Shakhtinskiy and
Pavlograd. (S/WN
Development and Testing
4. Mobile Missile Base 2. The probable C3
upgrading that has been in progress since March
continued, and at the end of the reporting period,
the south side of the the base command post
bunker was still exposed. This activity parallels that
seen at the, four Plesetsk SS-16 bases prior to their
conversion from older ICBM systems. The upgrad-
ing may be preparing MOB 2 to support SS-X-25
operations, or it may be related to an overall SRF
C3 upgrading program. If either is the case, similar
activity should also be observed at the other three
SS-16 bases. (S/WN)
5. SS-X-25 Activity. The tenth, 11th, and 12th
tests of SS-X-25 ICBMs were probably from a TEL at
LTS 23 (Table 1). No prelaunch activity was ob-
served before the 26 July launch of an SS-X-25
from Plesetsk (DEFSMAC S/DQ/664-84 [SI). On
he silos at LTS 23
and collocated LTS 24 were both open. Both silos
have been open after previous probable mobile
tests of the SS-X-25.
pre aunch activity was ob-
served at LTS 24. A camouflaged probable TEL and
a large camouflaged vehicle were on site, and the
silo door was open. The probable TEL was on the
silo apron next to a probable test-range version of
an azimuth alignment device
3. Mobile Missile-Associated Facilities. All
four mobile ICBM bases at Plesetsk (MOB 1, MOB
2, LTS 5, and LTS 6; Figure 3) and all 42 of the
launch reference positions (LRPs) were observed
at least once. Canvas-covered probable azimuth
alignment devices (AADs) were occasionally de-
tected in some of the LRPs. In general, all four
mobile missile-associated bases continued to be
occupied as evident from the occasional observa-
tion of personnel, vehicle tracks, and facility
maintenance. In addition, both the complex driv-
er/dispersal training area near LTS 16 and the one
near MOB 1 were used during the quarter.
However, no mobile missile-associated vehicles
were identified in either of these areas. (S/WN)
MOBILE ICBM
FACILITY 1 'Q'6
MOBILE ICBM
FACILITY 2
PROB RAIL MOBILE
ICBM MRACA
MISSILE
HANDLING
FACILITY
R(-A-O1 OO7184 Top Secret RUFF
NPIC T-9700
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
The other cam-
ouflaged vehicle was at the intersection of the site
access road and silo apron. No vehicles were
observed at the collocated Plesetsk ICBM Launch
Test Site 23, where the silo door was closed. On 10
September, DEFSMAC reported the launch of an
SS-X-25 from Plesetsk at 1330Z (DEFSMAC
. No evidence of the launch was
observed approximately 20
hours and 30 minutes after the launch. On 2
October, DEFSMAC reported the unsuccessful test
of an SS-X-25 from Plesetsk
No prelaunch activity was identified, and
no postlaunch imagery has been acquired. It
should be noted that because of effective CC&D
practices, the TEL for the SS-X-25 still has not been
identified at Plesetsk. (TSR)
it MOBILE ICBM FACILITY
? TYPE IIIE LAUNCH SITE
SS-X-25 LAUNCH TEST SITE
LAUNCH CONTROL FACILITY
NEW LTS
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFFI
Table 1.
SS-X-25 Launch Summary
Launch Site
Remarks*
(mode) **
8 Feb 83
LTS 23 (silo)
Success
5 May 83
LTS 23 (silo)
Success
31 May 83
LTS 23 (silo)
Success
10 Aug 83
LTS 23 (TEL)
Failure
25 Oct 83
LTS 23 (TEL)
Success
19 Feb 84
LTS 23 (TEL)
Success
26 Mar 84
LTS 23 (TEL)
Success
23 Apr 84
LTS 23 (TEL)
Success
23 May 84
LTS 23 (TEL)
Success" "
26 Jul 84
Prob LTS 23 (TEL)t
Success
10 Sep 84
LTS 24 (TEL)-l-
Success
2 Oct 84
Prob LTS 23/24 (TEL)?
Failure
First reduced range test
No prelaunch activity or any direct evidence of the launch was
identified
6. Plesetsk Missile Handling Facility. Modifi-
cation/construction in the modified SS-16/SS-X-25
receiving/inspection/checkout area in support of
the SS-X-25 has increased. Construction of a
second type C single-bay garage and a second 18-
meter-deep, nine-bay garage was identified east of
the rail line. When these structures are completed,
the following buildings will have been constructed
east of the rail line in support of the SS-X-25:
? two type C single-bay garages;
? two 18-meter-deep, nine-bay garages;
? one missile-/payload-associated clerestory
building;
? one three-bay garage;
?
one four-bay garage;
?
one
ing;
fourth-generatiori calibration build-
?
one
two-bay, 18-meter-deep, open-sided
shed; and
?
one single-bay, drive-through building.
The numbers and types of buildings being con-
structed in this area indicate that the area east of
the rail line will support the SS-X-25 ICBM as the
battalion-sized crew training area at Kapustin Yar
Bivouac/Troop Training Area supports the SS-20
IRBM. In addition, wall stanchions for the new
probable clerestory building in the northwest
section of the facility were installed. This building
will probably have low-bay outer sections that are
42 by 12 by 8 meters and a high-bay center section
about 42 by 20 meters (height undetermined). No
road-mobile ICBM equipment has been identified
in this facility, and no payload-associated crates
were observed during the quarter. (S/WN)
7. Plesetsk Complex Driver/Dispersal Train-
ing Area (previously reported as the complex
DDTA near LTS 16). Construction of a new GSE
parking/maintenance area continued throughout
the reporting period at this double-fence-secured
facility. Two quonset-like buildings were com-
pleted, a third was under construction, and a type
C garage was constructed between the two quon-
set-like buildings. Sufficient space to build another
type C SBG exists between the inner completed
quonset-like building and the quonset-like build-
new GSE parking/maintenance area and the driv-
er/dispersal training area will probably support SS-
X-25 field training exercises. (S/WN)
25X1
25X1
25X1
LOA I
Top Secret RUFF
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
8. Launch Test Site 21. No activity was identi-
fied during the reporting period to indicate that
this site will participate in the flight test program
of the SS-X-25. (S/WN)
9. Rail-Mobile SS-X-24-Associated Activity.
One test of an SS-X-24 was conducted during the
reporting period, probably from a rail-TEL (Table
2). In addition, construction of a fourth probable
rail-mobile launch test position was identified at
Plesetsk ICBM Launch Test Site 28, and construc-
tion of additional probable rail-mobile, ICBM-
associated facilities continued. (TSR)
Table 2.
SS-X-24 Launch Summary*
26 Oct 82
28 Dec 82
15 Mar 83
26 May 83
6 Sep 83
23 Nov 83
24 Dec 83
18 Jan 84
15 Feb 84
28 Mar 84
8 Jun 84
28 Jun 84
7 Sep 84
Launch Site Remarks**
(mode)***
LTS 28A (silo)
LTS 22 (silo)
LTS 28A (silo)
LTS 22 (silo)
LTS 28A (silo)
LTS 22 (silo)
LTS 28A (silo)
LTS 22 (silo)
LTS 22 (silo)
LTS 28 (rail-TEL)
LTS 28 (rail-TEL)
LTS 28 (rail-TEL)tt
LTS 28 (rail-TEL)
Failure
Failure*
Failure
Failure
Failure
Success
Success
Success
Failure
Failure
Success
Success
Success
Although the payload impacted on the Kamchatka Peninsula
PBV apparently did not function properly
Possible rail-TEL identified on 27 June
10. One to five railcars were in the rail-
mobile SS-X-24 launch test facility (LTF) at LTS 28
Rail-mobile
prelaunch activity was identifie
when at least 11 railcars and two
engines were in the LTF (Figure 5). Five railcars
were on each of the spurs that straddle the buried
launch control building, and two engines and at
least one railcar were on the spur leading into the
102-meter-long, rail-in shed. The partially enclosed
sides of the rail shed precluded determining
whether any other railcars were under the shed.
the number and
location of the railcars and engines did not appear
to change, and the presence of the possible rail-
TEL identified could not be confirmed.
EFSMAC reported the launch
of an SS-X-24 from Plesetsk
84 [S]). Based on the activity identified during early
September and previously identified rail-mobile
activities, we believe that this missile was probably
launched from a rail-TEL at LTS 28. If the rail-TEL
close of the reporting period, as many as four
railcars were on one of the spurs that straddle the
buried launch control building. (TSR)
11. During June, the Soviets began con-
structing a fourth probable rail-mobile SS-X-24
launch test position in the launch test facility.
(TSR)
12. In late June, extension of the rail spur
north of the buried launch control building was
begun when ballast was added and graded in line
with the east end of the rail spur.
three objects possibly associated wit azimuth
alignment of the missile guidance package were
just past the end of the existing north rail spur in
the area of the extension. When the extension of
the spur is complete and the remaining probable
azimuth alignment equipment is installed for the
new probable position, four probable rail-mobile
launch test positions will be in the LTF-two on
each of the spurs that straddle the buried launch
control building. Construction of the fourth
launch test position continued at a moderate pace
through the end of the reporting period. The
probable rail-mobile launch test positions at LTS 28
provide a unique signature for a rail-mobile SS-X-
24 launch point that should be kept at the TOP
SECRET RUFF classification level. (TSR)
13. trees were
being cleared in a line west of the rail-mobile
launch test facility toward the separately secured,
rail-served section of Plesetsk Launch Control
Facility B. Similar clearing was started from the
102-meter-long, rail-in shed at Launch Control
Facility B toward the rail-mobile launch test facility
during July. This tree clearing appears to be in a
line without regard for terrain and suggests that
equipment requiring line-of-sight will be installed
at one or both facilities. (S/WN)
25X1
25X1
25"4
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
2bAl
25X1
25X1
only four railcars were on
25X1
the north spur. From through the
25X1
(Continued p. 8)
25X1
25X1
Top Secret RUF
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied
Iq
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
15. At the rail-served section of Plesetsk
Launch Control Facility (LCF) B, no missile- or C3-
associated railcars were identified.
a swath was being cleared
through the trees south of the 102-meter-long,
rail-in shed toward the rail-mobile SS-X-24 launch
test facility at LTS 28. The trees were being cleared
in a line without regard for the hilly terrain or
of the facility continued to be used as a temporary
rail-transloading area for construction material
delivered by rail for the modified Type IIIX LCF
section of the facility. (S/WN)
16. Rail-Mobile SS-X-24 Missile Receiving
and Checkout Area (MRACA). Construction of the
rail-mobile SS-X-24 MRACA continued. Activity
identified during the reporting period included
the continuing construction of a large, probably
rail-served building with a possible rail-through
shed at its entrance; the near completion of a
probable support building just north of the new
large rail-served building; the near completion of
a 102-meter-long, rail-in shed near the new build-
ing; new, unidentified construction just southwest
of the rail-mobile MRACA (but outside the securi-
ty fence). (S/WN)
17. East Support Facility. Most construction
at the new RTP area continued at a moderate
pace; however, no new rail sections were installed
in the spur that extends toward the main east-west
complex road. It has not been determined if this
spur will be a rail-turning wye or another rail-
served facility. Rail sections and rail line compo-
nents were still in the RTP area at the end of the
reporting period. (S/WN)
18. Rail Line Construction at Plesetsk. Con-
struction of the new section along the eastern
extension of the main complex rail line continued
slowly. It still cannot be determined whether this
new spur will be a rail siding or the start of
another major rail spur at the eastern end of the
rangehead. Construction of the rail-to-road trans-
loading point just outside LTS 28 progressed
slowly. During July, a rail stop was installed about
0.25 nm southwest of the site, indicating that the
eastern rail line extension will not be extended
past its current terminus at this time. At the end of
the reporting period, the only structure still under
construction was the transloading dock. (S/WN)
19. Possible Rail-Mobile ICBM-Associated
Activity. At the rail-turning wye approximately 1
nm south-southeast of the Missile Handling Facil-
ity, reconstruction of the rail bed and installation
of the rail line was completed I No
additional grading/leveling or construction activi-
ties were identified. The function of this area has
not been determined. (S/WN)
20. Construction of the new rail-served area
north of the SS-13 receiving, inspection, and
checkout area continued. The new building will
have two rail-through bays (each 84 by 9 by 9
meters) and a probable administration/support
bay Also, the rail line was
extended into the new area from the spur that
originally terminated next to the SS-13 interim
missile storage building. The function of this area
has not been determined, but it probably is not
being constructed to support SS-13 operations.
(S/W N)
21. CC&D Activity. The Soviets continued
the effective use of CC&D techniques at Plesetsk.
Although 13 tests of the SS-X-24 and 11 tests of the
SS-X-25 have been conducted, neither missile
canister has been observed (Table 3). Moreover,
even though four probable tests of the rail-mobile
variant of the SS-X-24 and seven tests of the road-
mobile version of the SS-X-25 have been con-
ducted, no system-unique equipment-including
a road- or rail-mobile TEL-has been confidently
identified. We believe the lack of mobile missile
signatures is the direct result of Soviet conceal-
ment practices such as positioning mobile SS-X-25
equipment in buildings and under camouflage
material suspended from poles, parking rail-mo-
bile SS-X-24 equipment in rail sheds and buildings,
and possibly designing and covering a rail-TEL for
the SS-X-24 so that it is nearly indistinguishable
from other rollingstock. (TSR)
Table 3.
Ballistic Missile Canister
Identification Summary
Missile
First Flight
First Canister
Location
System
Test
Identified
SS-16
Mar 72
Jul 72
Plesetsk MSTC
MHF and LTS 5
SS-17
Sep 72
Aug 72'
Tyuratam MTC LTS
V1 (then LTS S6)
SS-18
Oct 72
May 73'
Tyuratam MTC LTS
R8 and LTS 811
SS-19
Apr 73
Apr 73
Tyuratam MTC
LTS G5/6
SS-20
Sep 74
Sep 74
Kapustin Yar MTC
Cmplx C Site 1
SS-X-24
Oct 82
None yet
SS-X-25
Feb 83
None yet
This canister was observed during the probable initial loading of this
silo about a month before the first flight test of an SS- 17.
At least a section of this missile canister /aas identified during April
1972 at Tyuratam MTC LTS H1/2 during the popup/LAD test phase
of the flight test program Although the identification at that time was
tentative, the lack of confidence in the identification was due to poor
image interpretability, not Soviet CC&D practices
22. The Soviet practice of building structures
at launch test facilities-sliding-roof garages and
rail-in sheds, for example-in which to house
mobile launchers has severely hampered the iden-
tification of mobile launchers during flight test
programs. The reasons for building these types of
structures at launch test sites probably include
simulating deployed conditions, providing envi-
ronmental protection, and implementing CC&D
practices. For the road-mobile SS-X-25, the type C
single-bay garage at LTS 23 probably simulates the
operational, ingarrison environment for the SS-X-
25 TEL and contributes to decreasing the likeli-
hood of observing the SS-X-25 TEL. Moreover, this
onsite single-bay garage allows the Soviets to bring
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
RCA-01/0017/84 Top Secret RUFF
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Se
(Similar
considerations probably also led to the construc-
tion of seven partially or fully enclosed rail sheds
for the rail-mobile SS-X-24. One shed is 45 meters
long, fully enclosed (except for the ends), and
located on a spur that leads directly into the rail-
mobile missile receiving and checkout building.
remaining sheds-five 102 meters long and one
300 meters long-are partially enclosed and situat-
ed either in a launch-related area or in an area to
provide temporary cover for many railcars. The six
partially enclosed sheds are all 6 meters high, and
the top 3 meters on each side have been covered,
like the roof, with thin prefabricated sections. This
(S/W N)
vents. In the C3 area, the ten-bay garage and the
C3 building were in the late stages of construction.
A roof-mounted antenna array, similar to those
seen at mobile SS-20 regimental C3 facilities, was
under construction on the C3 building. No other
antennas were visible. (S/WN)
26. I lat the Yoshkar-Ola ICBM
Division Command Post Bunker, a small personnel
bunker was being uncovered and will probably be
removed, possibly in preparation for the construc-
tion of new antennas. (S/WN)
Yurya SSM Complex
27. Mobile Missile Base 6. At Yurya Mobile
Missile Base 6 (formerly LP 11), new mobile
missile-associated construction continued. F
foundations for six type C single-bay
garages could be confirmed, and clearings proba-
bly for three more had been identified (Figure 8).
Three seven-bay garages were in a late stage of
construction, and modifications were continuing
on the west missile-ready bunker. Vents have
already been installed on the east missile-ready
bunker. Tree clearing for a fenceline behind the
missile-ready bunkers indicated that the missile-
ready bunkers will be included within the opera-
tions area, unlike those at the Yoshkar-Ola Mobile
Base, where a fenceline separates the operations
area from the former missile-ready bunkers.
(S/WN
been imaged
the possible rail-TEL has
the railcar identified as a possible rail-TEL cou
not be confirmed (Figure 5). (S/WN)
Deployment
Yoshkar-Ola SSM Complex
25. Mobile Missile Base 1. Construction con-
tinued at this base, which is probably intended for
deployment of the SS-X-25 mobile ICBM.
single-bay garage components had arrived
and were positioned near our of the type C
single-bay garage foundations. Three additional
type C garage foundations were identified, and it
now appears that at least nine SBGs will be
constructed (Figure 7). two of
the seven-bay garages (previously reported as
eight-bay garages) were externally complete with
roof vents installed. The third seven-bay garage
was externally complete but did not have roof
Production
Kamensk-Shakhtinskiy
28. The large fabrication-type building was
nearly complete externally, and a probable rail
spur to serve the building was under construction
at Kamensk-Shakhtinskiy Solid Motor Production
Plant. Ground preparations for two new buildings
and a new roadway were also in progress. No
additional construction occurred on the possible
bay-charger line. (S/WN)
Pavlograd
29. At Pavlograd Solid Motor Production
Plant, construction on both the large fabrication
building and the new three-bay building contin-
ued. Construction on a rail spur to the new
fabrication building and a new bay-charger line
continued. Both the Kamensk-Shakhtinskiy and
Pavlograd plants are involved in various stages of
strategic rocket motor production, including pro-
duction of SS-X-25 motors at Kamensk-Shakhtin-
skiy and production of SS-X-24 motors at Pavlo-
grad. (S/WN)
RCA-01/0017/84 Top Secret RUFF
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
25X1
25X1
25X1
LOA I
25X1
2bAl
25X1
25X1
2bAl
25X1
25X1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUF
30. At Pavlograd Solid Motor Assembly and
Test Support Facility (SMATSF), the building pro-
gram which was resumed and expanded in early
1983 continued. In addition, construction in a new
area of expansion was started along the northeast-
ern boundary of the facility. The new expansion
area includes construction for a concrete road and
two probable rail spurs and ground preparations
for two new buildings. Analysis of present fence
realignments indicates that the new construction
will approximately double the usable area of the
facility. This construction is believed to be related
to the new construction at the Pavlograd Solid
Motor Production Plant. (S/WN)
31. Additionally at the SMATSF, construction
of a new rail shed has begun on a new rail spur
next to the existing 124-meter-long rail shed. This
new shed could be as long as 350 meters when
complete. (S/WN)
Missile Support Rear Depots
32. Surovatikha. The pace of construction
increased in the new missile receiving and storage
area at Surovatikha Missile Support Rear Depot
(Figure 9). Construction continued on the missile
receiving and checkout building in the revetted
area of the new storage facility. This 60- by 18-
meter building will consist of a 12-meter-wide,
high-bay section and a 6-meter-wide, low-bay
section. Construction was also started on a third
missile storage building, and space is available for
two more missile storage buildings. This facility
could be at least partially operational in mid-1985.
Although this specialized storage facility has been
under construction since 1978, the increase in the
pace of construction at this time suggests that the
area is probably associated with the SS-X-24 and/
or the SS-X-25. (S/WN)
33. Tambov. Construction continued on the
two missile storage buildings at Tambov Missile
Support Rear Depot. These two new buildings
should be completed by the end of this year. In
addition, a rail spur is under construction, and
associated expansion is taking place in the open
transshipment yard in the eastern part of the
depot. This expansion could be related to the
storage of the SS-X-24 or the SS-X-25. (S/WN)
25X1
25X1
Rc'cc'rsc side hlanh.
- 11 -
Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Intermediate-Range Ballistic
Missile Activity
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
LIDA (5)
LUTSK (5) # 't POSTAVY (5)
MOZYR (5)
ROMNY (5)
BELOKOROVICHI (2) ? YURYA (5)
VERKHNYAYA
SALDA (5)
NOVOSIBIRSK (6) ? 4 KANSK (3)
BARNAUL (5)
NOVAVA
MEZINOVKA
BERDICHEV
0 g BRVANSK, TURAKOVO
MOSCOW
BALTA
0 ? SHUMERLYA
TAMBOV. \ ?
VOLGOGRAD? SUROVATIKHA GLAZOV
KAPUSTIN
YAR
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Sec F
Introduction
INTERMEDIATE-RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILE ACTIVITY
34. This section of the report addresses not-
able activity identified during this reporting period
regarding deployment, development, and pro-
duction of mobile intermediate-range ballistic mis-
siles (IRBMs). It includes information on the
identification of the 51st through 56th mobile
IRBM bases at Brody, Sokal, Barnaul, Kansk,
Usovo, and Belokorovichi, respectively, an indica-
tion of the continued accelerated Soviet deploy-
ment of SS-20s; the dismantlement of all nine
single-bay garages at Yurya Mobile IRBM Base 3;
the onset of the flight test program for the KY-15
(probable follow-on S-20); and the identifi-
cation of a new EL and missile canister
dolly at Kapustin Yar (Figures 10A and 10B). Also
provided is a summary of significant activity ob-
served at deployed bases, field training areas, and
testing and production facilities. Tables summariz-
ing field training areas, mobile missile base con-
struction, and C3 activity can be found in the
appendix. (TS
Deployment
35. Mobile IRBM base construction contin-
ued at an unprecedented rate (Figure 11). Six new
SS-20 bases were identified during this reporting
period, bringing the number of new SS-20 bases
identified this year to 12. The SS-20 force now
consists of 56 confirmed bases: 42 complete and 14
under construction (one of the 14, Yurya Mobile
IRBM Base 3, was being dismantled). Preparations
for the probable construction of at least five more
bases were in progress at three former SS-4 launch
sites-Korosten launch site 2, Belokorovichi
launch site 1, and Zhitomir launch site 2-and in
two areas in the Kansk Division (see paragraph
118). If these are confirmed as bases and if the
Pruzhany and Ruzhany bases are resubordinated
to Lida,* the Soviets would have 11 SS-20 divisions
of five bases each and one division, Novosibirsk,
with six. (S/WN
Western USSR/Vinnitsa SRF Army
36. Usovo.
IRBM base was identified in a very early stage of
construction at Usovo MRBM Launch Site 3, a
former SS-4 launch site in the Belokorovichi
Division. This is the first confirmed SS-20 base in
*This possibility is based on the proximity of the regiments to the Lida Division and the absence of SS-20-related
activity at the Pruzhany division-level facilities. (S/WN)
18
17
16-
151
14
(5)
SUSPECT
AREAS /
/
BASE COUNT 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 EARLY
1985
SECRET/WNINTEL
FIGURE 11. SS-20 BASE CONSTRUCTION STARTS BY YEAR
- 13 -
Top Secret RUFI
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
the Belokorovichi Division. The new base, desig-
nated Usovo Mobile IRBM Base 1, was previously
reported in the Late Developments section of
Mobile Missile Summary Report 24. Launch site 3
was deactivated in April 1984, and tree clearing
was first observed in the launch area
additional tree clearing was observed in
the propellant storage area,
footings for a four-bay garage were identified in
what will become the operations area of this base.
Two additional clearings, large enough to accom-
modate four-bay garages, were also present. Addi-
tional footings, possibly for a C3 building, were
observed along the perimeter of the operations
area S/WN)
37. Belokorovichi. the 56th
mobile IRBM base was identified under construc-
tion at Belokorovichi MRBM Launch Site 2. The
new base, designated Belokorovichi Mobile IRBM
Base 1, is the second mobile IRBM base identified
in the Belokorovichi Division. This site was re-
ported as a deactivated SS-4 site As
deactivation was taking place, initial signs of tree
clearing were noted. three
clearings for four-bay garages were identified.
One of these contained the actual footings for a
garage, a second set of
footings had been installed. Also identified were
foundations for a C3 building and its associated
multibay garage, clearings for several probable
single-bay garages, and a cleared swath for a
security fence. (S/WN)
Mozyr Division
39. Mozyr. A new type of satellite communi-
cations station was under construction at the
Mozyr IRBM Division Headquarters Radio Com-
munications Transmitte The station,
designated Type E, was in the late stages of
construction and consists of a two-story,
building with two square antenna ped-
estals n he roof.
raised section is between the pedestals. No anten-
nas were observed. (S/WN)
40. The Mozyr Division already has a Type A
satellite communications station. The addition of
the Type E station would make Mozyr the only SS-
20 division with two permanent satellite communi-
cations stations. The reason for this increased
satellite communication capability has not yet
been determined. (S/WN)
42. A tower-mounted TWIN EAR antenna
was observed ext to the Gresk SS-20
Payload Han ing acl I y. resk is currently the
only SS-20 regiment-level facility, as well as the
with a
tower-mounted TWIN EAR. Construction on the
tower and the associated control building began in
early February. Tower-mounted TWIN EAR anten-
nas were previously seen only at division-level SS-
20 C3 facilities. The reason for a tower-mounted
TWIN EAR antenna at the Gresk SS-20 regiment
has not been determined. (S/WN)
Romny Division
25X1
25X1
25X1
LOA I
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
43. Romny. C3 upgrading continued
Romny MR/IRBM Division Command
at the
Post/
Bunker (see Mobile Missile Summary 23).
2.5X1
a Type E satellite communications station
25X1
adjacent to the control bunker was in the late
stages of construction. Also, a modified hardened
dome antenna was in the midstage of construction
next to the control bunker (Figure 12). The
modified hardened dome antenna is a Phase II
hardened antenna believed to be used for com-
municating with an airborne command post. Until
October 1983, these antennas were only at ICBM
launch sites and launch control facilities. Since
then, however, modified hardened dome anten-
nas have been under construction at four ICBM
division command posts and the Lutsk MR/IRBM
Division Command Post (see paragraph 48). The
recent construction of modified hardened dome
antennas at both IRBM and IC13M division com-
mand posts indicates increasing deployment of
this antenna and a possible increased airborne
command post function within the SRF. (S/WN)
44. Krolevets. two heli-
pads were under construction in an open field
approximately 300 meters north of Mobile IRBM
Base 1. Concrete paving blocks were in the center
of two square graded areas. (S/WN)
45. Mobile IRBM Base 2 was nearly exter-
nally complete during this reporting period.
all nine single-bay garages and the
three tour-bay garages appeared to be complete;
however, the road network within the operations
area was not yet paved. The C3 area was in a late
R(-A-01110017184 Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
2.5X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
stage of construction. The three-story C3 building
was complete, and the roof of the associated 11-
bay garage was being tarred. One lattice mast
antenna had been erected adjacent to the C3
building, and a single-story, flat-roofed building
had been added to the motor pool section of the
support area. Construction has advanced further
and faster at this base than at any other base
currently under construction. As a result, it seems
likely that this will be the next base to achieve
operational status. (S/WN)
46. Akhtyrka. Steady progress has been ob-
served at Akhtyrka Mobile IRBM Bases 1 and 2, the
fourth and fifth bases in the Romny Division. As of
the number of single-bay garages at
Mobile Base 1 remained at seven, unchanged from
the last reporting period. However, all three four-
bay garages were in late stages of construction,
with the roof of one of these buildings almost
completely tarred. Similarly, the C3 building and
its associated 11-bay garage were in late stages of
construction in the old propellant storage area.
(S/WN)
47. At Mobile IRBM Base 2
all nine single-bay garages had been erected. One
of the four-bay garages was externally complete,
RCA-0110017184 Top Secret RUFF
one had a partially tarred roof, and the third had
only two-thirds of its roof panels in place. The
security building used to control access to the
operations area was complete, and construction in
the propellant area had progressed to the point
where this area could now be confirmed as the
new C3 area. Construction there consisted of a
three-story C3 building and an 11-bay garage, both
in late stages of construction. (S/WN)
48. Lutsk. Additional C3 upgrading occurred
at the Lutsk IR/MRBM Division Command Post
Bunker during this reporting period.
three 28-meter lattice towers, probably supporting
STICK PIN antennas, were near the control
bunker, and a 2-2-2 FISHBONE antenna was in the
25X1
25X1
25X1
ZOA1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
late stages of construction northeast of the
bunker. Also, a probable five-element antenna
array had been constructed on the northwestern
corner of the bunker, and a modified hardened
dome antenna was in the midstage of construction
next to the bunker. (S/WN)
49. Sokal.~the 52nd mobile IRBM
base was identifie in an early stage of construc-
tion at Sokal SSM Launch Position 3, a former SS-4
launch site. Construction continued at this base,
designated Sokal Mobile IRBM Base 1 (previously
reported in the Late Developments section in
Mobile Missile Summary Report 24)
=, footings for one four-bay garage were visible
in the former launch area of this deactivated SS-4
base. Also, trees had been cleared in areas large
enough to accommodate two additional four-bay
garages and two single-bay garages. (S/WN)
50. Ostrog. Construction has continued since
the initial identification of Ostrog as a mobile base
Construction was still in the early
stages, with foundations present for one multibay
and two four-bay garages. three
single-bay garage foundations had been added.
(S/W N)
51. Brody. the 51st mobile IRBM
base was identified in the midstage of construction
at Brody MRBM Launch Site 3, a former SS-4 silo
launch site. This base is the first SS-20 base to be
constructed at a deactivated hard SSM launch site
in the western USSR. The new base, designated
Brody Mobile IRBM Base 1, was previously re-
ported in the Late Developments section in Mo-
bile Missile Summary Report 24.
construction consisted of six single-bay garages,
two five-bay garages, one multibay garage, and a
probable C3 building. Five-bay garages have never
before been constructed in the operations area of
a mobile IRBM base in the western USSR; they
have previously been confined to the operations
areas of scratch-built bases in the east. Their
presence at Brody may be due to the fact that SS-4
hard sites do not have the missile-ready bunkers
which are present at SS-4 soft sites, and conse-
quently, extra garage space for missile support
vans (MSVs) is needed. (S/WN)
Western USSR/Smolensk Army
Postavy Division
52. Postavy. An SS-20-associated C3 exercise
consisting of 11 camouflaged SS-20-associated ve-
hicles was observed in a wooded area southeast of
Postavy Mobile IRBM Base 1F ]A FINE
PAIR antenna (proposed name) was mounted on
one of the nine MSVs involved in the exercise.
This is the first sighting of the FINE PAIR at this
facility. (S/WN)
53. The FINE PAIR antenna system consists
of two 2.0-meter-diameter screens/dishes on a
lattice tower, mounted on an MSV (Figure 13). This
antenna is probably for radio-relay and has only
been observed with SS-20 field training C3 exer-
cises, The
FINE PAIR antenna was first observed at Novosi-
birsk when it was identified as a
TWIN EAR B
Table 4.
FINE PAIR Summary
Location
WESTERN USSR
Krolevets SSM Complex
Postavy Mobile IRBM Base
EASTERN USSR
Novosibirsk FTA 011
Novosibirsk FTA/R 001
Novosibirsk FTA 20
Drovyanaya SSM Complex
RCA-01/0017/84 Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUF
25X1
25X1
54. Ruzhany.*I the opera-
tions area of Ruzhany Mobile IRBM Base 1
contained foundations for eight single-bay garages
in addition to the footings for three four-bay
garages. These four-bay garages had progressed to
the midstage of construction, with walls and some
roof panels already installed. A foundation for a
C3 building was added to the area that contained
footings for an 11-bay garage. New vents had been
installed on the former SS-4 missile-ready bunkers.
(S/WN)
55. Pruzhany.* The 50th SS-20 mobile IRBM
base was identified at Pruzhany Launch Site 1 on
and designated Pruzhany Mobile IRBM
Base 1. the foundation for a
security building was in place outside the opera-
tions area that contained foundations for four
single-bay garages and two four-bay garages (Fig-
ure 14). Additional clearings and construction
material were also in this area. As at other recent
SS-20 bases being constructed at deactivated SS-4
sites, the former propellant storage area has
apparently been selected as the location for the
new C3 area. Footings for an 11-bay garage and a
probable C3 building were present. (S/WN)
56. Lida construction was
nearly complete on the Type E satellite communi-
cations station at the Lida IRBM Division Com-
mand Post/Bunker. The two parabolic dish anten-
nas have been installed, indicating that this station
is or will soon be operational (Figure 15). (S/WN)
Central USSR/Vladimir SRF Army
Yurya Division
57. Yurya. The Yurya Division is probably
undergoing conversion to another missile system.
Possibilities include the SS-20 follow-on IRBM or
the SS-X-25 ICBM. The nine single-bay garages at
Yurya Mobile IRBM Base 3, an operational SS-20
base since December 1980, have been dismantled.
First sins of dismantlement were observed
garage components had been removed.
when two garages were completely dis-
mantled and two were partially dismantled. Four
days later, dismantlement of a fifth single bay
garage began. Initially, the disassembled garage
components were stacked by the foundations and
were not removed from the operations area.
However, one set of single-bay
all nine garages were dismantled, and
garages has been dismantled. (S/WN~
the components for four of these had been
removed from the operations area (Figure 16). The
final disposition of these components has not
been determined. None of the three three-bay
58. The purpose of this dismantlement has
not been determined. Because of the construction
of Mobile Base 6 with type C SS-X-25-associated
single-bay garages and because of the fact that
only the single-bay garages are being disassem-
bled, these SS-20-associated single-bay garages
may be converted to the longer SS-X-25-associated
garages, making this a second probable support
base for the SS-X-25 in the Yurya Division. If this is
*I hose regiments were previously reported under Pruzhany Division. (S/WN)
Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
9 (1
25X1
LOA-1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFFI
25X1
25X1
confirmed, it is expected that the remaining four
SS-20 bases at Yurya will also be converted.
(S/WN
59. Dismantlement of the single-bay garages
was preceded by removal of appendages between
Whether this removal may be
indicator of single-bay garage dis-
mantlement is uncertain. Although the appen-
dages were removed from one single-bay garage
at Yurya Mobile IRBM Base 2
garage dismantlement has not yet fol-
lowed. Similarly, although the appendages were
removed from the single-bay garages at Yurya
Mobile IRBM Base 1 between January and August
1984, the garages are still intact. Appendages at
Yurya Mobile IRBM Base 4 have been absent from
all but one single-bay garage since January 1984.
Before appendage removal is determined to be an
indicator of garage dismantlement and base con-
version, activity at two additional SS-20 complexes,
Novosibirsk and Verkhnyaya Salda, should be
closely analyzed. Appendages have been removed
from single-bay garages at the bases with appen-
dages at Novosibirsk since September 1984 and at
Verkhnyaya Salda since January 1983. But, unlike
Yurya, no further dismantlement was observed at
either Verkhn a a Salda or Novosibirsk.
(S/W N
Eastern USSR/Chita SRF Army
60. Kansk.~ a new scratch-built SS-
20 base was discovered in the midstage of con-
struction. Designated Kansk Mobile IRBM Base 3,
it is the 54th mobile IRBM base identified in the
Soviet Union and the third in the Kansk Division.
This base, initially reported on in the Late Devel-
opments section of Mobile Missile Summary Re-
port 24, consists of an operations area with nine
single-bay garage foundations and three five-bay
garages in a mid-to-late stage of construction; a C3
area with a multistory C3 building and a ten-bay
garage; and a general support area containing two
multistory buildings, one multibay garage, a sin-
gle-story administration building, and a steam-
plant. This location had previously been moni-
tored as a possible SS-20 construction site. Tree
18 -
Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
clearing for the base. road network had begurd
and actual base construction proba-
bly started in early 1984. The base is approximately
15 run east-southeast of the Kansk SS-20 Support
Complex. (S/WN)
61. A regimental complement of SS-20 mis-
sile support equipment (nine probable TELs and 20
canvas-covered probable MSVs) was observed
This equipment was probably destined for Kansk
Mobile IRBM Base 2. approximately
ten SS-20-associated vehicles were loaded on
railcars in the RTP, suggesting that additional
probable SS-20-associated vehicles were in the
operations area of Kansk Mobile IRBM Base 2. The
next day, an SS-20 TEL with a training canister was
near the entrance to the operations area. These
equipment sightings and the apparent completion
of all necessary construction in the operations and
C3 areas suggest that this base will soon become
operational. (S/WN)
the Kansk Division
Headquarters was in the late stages of construc-
tion. It consisted of a C3 building with a roof-top
antenna array and three lattice towers. The roof-
top antenna array was similar to the array on the
C3 building at the Barnaul IRBM Division Head-
quarters. (S/WN)
Drovyanaya Division
64. Drovyanaya. an ex-
pended SS-20 canister was under netting in the
operations area of Mobile IRBM Base 4.
RCA-01!0017184 Top Secret RUFF
three additional expended SS-20 can-
isters were in the operations area of Mobile IRBM
Base 1. Expended canisters are often used in the
construction of SS-20 mockups. These canisters are
probably from the SS-20 exercise described in the
field training section of this report (see paragraph
72). (S/WN)
65. Drovyanaya Remote Site. Site dismantle-
ment was first noted when the roof
sections of two of the three single-bay garages
were removed and the solid fence surrounding
the facility was disassembled all three
garages had been completely disassem led and
the single-bay garage components removed. Only
two open-sided sheds remained. Since its identifi-
cation in August 1979, this site has never been
assessed to be operational nor has its function
been confirmed. (S/WN)
66. Drovyanaya ICBM/IRBM Complex Com-
mand Post Bunker. a large excavation
had been dug into t o si e o t o control bunker.
No further activity associated with this excavation
has been observed. Additionally,
12 communication vehicles were lined up along
the access road preparing to depart the facility. On
the vehicles were not present and
may have been field deployed. (S/WN)
67. a mobile TWIN EAR
antenna was observed in an operational mode
1,000 meters north of Drovyanaya ICBM Head-
quarters Radio Communications Receiver Bunker.
The TWIN EAR antenna was previously observed
in the same location It
could not be determined if the TWIN EAR was
participating in a field training exercise. (S/WN)
Eastern USSR/Omsk Army
68. Barnaul. da fifth mobile base
was identified in the Barnaul Division, bringing the
number of SS-20 bases in the Soviet Union to 53.
The new base, designated Barnaul Mobile IRBM
Base 5, was in the midstage of construction when
identified. work had advanced
to the point where six single-bay garages were
externally complete, and a seventh was in the late
stages of construction. Foundations for the re-
maining two single-bay garages were present. All
three of the five-bay garages were nearly com-
plete, and the internal road network was partially
paved. The C3 area contained a multistory C3
building and its associated multibay garage.
(S/W N)
69. The priority for base completion within
this division has apparently shifted to Mobile
IRBM Base 5. While construction progressed rap-
idly at Mobile IRBM Base 5, work appeared to
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
2.5X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
Al-
though single-bay garage foundations were never
observed at this base, footings for three four-bay
garages and for the three component structures of
a nuclear payload handling facility (a clerestory
building, a high two-bay building, and a technical
support building) were identified.
tents had been removed from the tempo-
rary support area. only one tent
remained, and a temporary barracks had been
dismantled. This change of base construction
priorities within a division is not unprecedented. A
similar occurrence was noted in the Drovyanaya
Complex in 1979. A construction hiatus of eight
months occurred at Mobile IRBM Base 4, appar-
ently in favor of Mobile IRBM Base 5. When
Mobile IRBM Base 5 was nearly complete, con-
struction resumed at Mobile IRBM Base 4. (S/WN)
70. Novosibirsk I the Type
C satellite communications station at Novosibirsk
IRBM Headquarters Radio Communications Trans-
mitter was in the final stages of construction. The
building was complete, but no antennas were on
the antenna pedestals. (S/WN)
Field Training
71. Deployment of mobile missile units to 11
FTAs in three division areas (Table 5) was observed
during this reporting period. Most of the exercises
were elements of the divisional exercise that
began during the previous reporting period (see
Mobile Missile Summary Report 24) and con-
cluded in mid-July. Four launches of SS-20 missiles
took place in the Drovyanaya Complex in Septem-
ber. No field training exercises were observed in
conjunction with the launches. (S/WN)
72. Drovyanaya. A division-level field train-
ing exercise in the Drovyanaya Complex that
began in mid-June was completed in July. A C3
relay unit associated with the FTX, deployed the
first identified FINE PAIR (proposed name) tropo-
scatter relay unit at 51-32-10N 113-00-03E. An MSV
and five support vehicles were deployed with it. In
September, four missiles were launched from the
Drovyanaya area: the first on 2 September with a
reentry location at Novaya Zemyla; the second
and third on 6 September, 15 minutes apart,
impacting at Novaya Zemyla and Kamchatka re-
spectively; and the fourth on 10 September, with
reentry also in Novaya Zemyla
RCA-011'0017184 Top Secret RUFF
Testing and Development
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
2.5X1
Kapustin Yar MSTC 25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF ~
73. Activity in support of the SS-20 crew
training program at Kapustin Yar MSTC (Figure 18)
continued throughout the reporting period. The
flight test program of a probable follow-on to the
SS-20 began a new-type
0 TEL was identified at Kapustin Yar
General Support Area.
mobile missile prelaunch activity was identified at
the new launch test position at Kapustin Yar MR
Test Complex C Site 1. On 27 September, DEFS-
MAC reported the launch of a probable follow-on
to the SS-20, interim designator KY-15 (Table 6),
from Ka ustin Yar
[T, a new-type mobile
missile canister dolly was identified at the range-
head. (T~
Table 6.
KY-15 Launch Summary
Launch Date* Launch Site Remarks*
(mode)**
.Although prelaunch activity was observed, no direct evidence of the
launch (burnmarks, blast effects, or selfeject launch technique
ISELTI rings) was identified
74. Activity in Support of SS-20 Flight Test-
ing/Crew Training. Activity in support of SS-20
crew training was observed throughout the report-
ing period. Based on the number, frequency, and
locations of SS-20 regiments observed at the
rangehead in 1984, it is likely that at least two SS-20
regiments are cycled through the rangehead each
month. During the reporting period, DEFSMAC
reported SS-20 launches on 20 July and on 4 and 31
75. A I battalion-sized SS-20 unit
was at Kapustin Yar Mobile IRBM Crew Training
Area (CTA) 1 and regimental-sized
SS-20 units were at Kapustin Yar Mobile IRBM CTA
5 during July and September. One SS-20 battalion
and occasionally elements of a second were
observed in the battalion-sized operational train-
ing area at Kapustin Yar MR/IRBM Bivouac/Troop
Training Area during July, August, and September.
As many as four SS-20 TELs with training canisters
and three TEL chassis have also been observed on
the driver-training course west of the Bivouac/
Troop Training Area at the same time that other
SS-20 crew training was in progress. One SS-20
regiment and occasionally elements of a second
regiment were in temporary storage or transit at
Kapustin Yar Missile Receiving/Inspection/Storage
Area during each month of the reporting period.
SS-20 regimental-sized field training exercises have
been observed nearly monthly in 1984 at the same
time that at least one SS-20 regiment was in transit
or temporary storage in the Receiving/Inspec-
tion/Storage Area. This suggests that at least two
and possibly three SS-20 regiments have been at
and cycled through the rangehead per month in
1984. Although some of this activity probably is in
support of crew training for regiments to be
deployed at new bases, it is likely that the majority
of the regiments observed at Kapustin Yar in areas
historically associated with the SS-20 are from
deployed complexes and are participating in cycli-
cal training. (S/WN)
76. Additional SS-20 C3 activity has been
identified at the rangehead. Since August 1979,
during periods when an SS-20 regiment is at the
s
GENERAL
SUPPORT AREA
- 21 -
2C COMPLEX C
? 3C
1 8C
MISSILE-
4CN"~ ASSOCIATED
AREA UCON
Top Secret RUFF
COMPLEX C
ASSEMBLY/
CHECKOUT
AREA
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
9 Y1
25X1
225X1
2bAl
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUF
rangehead for training, a regimental C3 unit has
been cable connected directly to two tower-
mounted, separately secured, STICK PIN antennas
at the Receiving/Inspection/Storage Area. At the
same time, a second regimental C3 unit has been
in the field with the launch battalions. The use of
two regimental C3 units with one SS-20 regiment
and the direct cable connection of missile support
vehicles to STICK PIN antennas are unusual and
have not been observed at deployed SS-20 com-
plexes. It is also unusual that the STICK PIN
antennas were installed in the Receiving/Inspec-
tion/Storage Area, a missile/equipment transload-
ing and temporary storage facility. STICK PIN
antennas are installed at SS-20 regiment and
division C3 facilities and are for UHF/VHF commu-
nications within a complex. The STICK PIN anten-
nas at the Receiving/Inspection/Storage Area
were installed between January and March 1979
and separately secured by .August 1979. (S/WN)
77. The most recent occurrence
of C3 activity at Ka ustin Yar
an SS-
20 regimental-sized unit consisting of two launch
battalions (each with two TELs) and a C3 unit were
training at Kapustin Yar Mobile IRBM CTA 5. On
another C3 unit was in the Receiv-
ing/Inspection/Storage Area. The latter C3 unit at
the Receiving/Inspection/Storage Area consisted
of five MAZ-type MSVs and at least two unidenti-
fied vehicles. Antenna masts were discernible on
three of the MSVs. An antenna mast was at both
ends of one vehicle, and a possible dish antenna
was observed on one MSV. (S/WN)
78. Activity in Support of a Follow-on to the
SS-20. (In previous Mobile Missile Summary Re-
ports, this section was titled "Activity in Support of
a New IRBM System.") Preparations for the flight
test program of a probable follow-on to the SS-20,
which has an interim designator of KY-15 was
identified during the reporting period.
a new-type, TEL,
probably for the KY-15, was identified at Kapustin
Yar General Support Area.
=probable KY-15 prelaunch activity was identi-
fied at the new launch test position at Kapustin Yar
MR Test Complex C Site 1.
DEFSMAC reported the launch of a KY-15 from
Kapustin Yar
a new-type mobile missile canister
dolly was identified at the rangehead. (TSD
79. At Kapustin Yar MR Test Complex C Site
1, probable KY-15 prelaunch activity was under
way On both
days, thre mobile missile-
associated vehicles-the easternmost was a proba-
ble MSV-were cable connected
on the major eas -west road in the new launch test
position at the north end of the site. This new
launch test position will be reported as launch
position (LP) 1C-4.
vehicle was under each of the two
18-meter-long, open-sided sheds at LP 1C-4. On 27
September, no vehicles were under the sheds, and
RCA-01/0017/84 Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
two unidentified-type vehicles (one with a proba-
ble antenna mast) were set up
just east of the site entrance. Except for the MSV
identified
DEFSMAC reported the launch of a KY-
15 from the rangehead. It has been assessed that
the KY-15 consists of the first two stages of the SS-
X-25 with a different postboost vehicle and a MIRV
payload. (T
no camouflaged vehi-
cles or equipment and no evidence of the launch
were identified at Site 1. However, because of the
identification of activity at LP 1C-4 just prior to the
launch, it is likely that the KY-15 was launched
from this new launch test position.
an additional mobile missile canister was
identified in the expended canister open storage
area at [P 1C-2. This canister
however, it did not appear to have a
domed endcap attached. Therefore, although this
canister appeared to be shorter than the complete
SS-20 canisters in this area, it could not be
determined if the new canister was a complete
canister or only part of a canister. Some of the SS-
20 canisters in this area have been cut u or have
had a section or sections removed. (TS
81. Also at Site 1, construction of the second
probable single-bay garage in the southwest sec-
tion of LP 1C-4 continued at a very slow pace. It
should be noted that this second single-bay garage
has a foundation different from the first type A/B
garage in this area. The second garage at LP 1C-4
has a foundation consisting of two rows of about
11 footings, which are similar to the footings of the
type B single-bay garage at LP 1C-3 at this site and
the foundation and crossmembers observed on an
apron at Novaya Mezinovka Missile Support Rear
Depot in 1980. The foundation of the first single-
bay garage was built using construction techniques
and footings that appeared to be identical to those
used to construct the type C (SS-X-25-associated)
single-bay garages at Plesetsk, Yoshkar-Ola, and
Yurya. It is important to note that there is no basic
external difference in the appearance or capabili-
ties of these single-bay garages constructed with
the 11-footing foundations. (S/WN
82. At Kapustin Yar MR Test Complex C Site
8, a rail-mounted shed was constructed at LP 8C-2
during August and September. This shed is identi-
cal to the one constructed at LP 8C-1. In addition,
during August, a cable trench was excavated from
the north subsurface building at LP 8C-1 to a small
excavation just east of the site. Unidentified prob-
able construction materials were near the small
RCA-01%017/84 Top Secret RUFF
excavation. The purpose of this new activity has
not been determined but may be electronics
related. This site is externally complete and proba-
bly is capable of supporting the flight test program
of a new mobile missile system. (S/WN)
83. At the new missile-associated area east of
Kapustin Yar MR Test Complex C Site 4C1, con-
struction continued at a slow pace. Most construc-
tion appeared to be nearly externally complete by
the end of the reporting period. The function of
this area still has not been determined. (S/WN)
84. Kapustin Yar Support Areas. Transship-
ment of elements of at least four probable SS-20
regiments were observed in the Kapustin Yar
Missile Receiving/Inspection/Storage Area during
the reporting period. In addition, an SS-20 regi-
mental C3 unit was frequently observed set up and
cable connected to the two separately secured
STICK PIN antennas at the facility. Construction of
the new possible mobile missile-associated nuclear
payload handling facility in the Receiving/Inspec-
tion/Storage Area continued at an extremely slow
pace. (S/WN)
85. At Kapustin Yar General Support Area,
activity probably in support of SS-20 crew training
and the flight test program of the KY-15 was
identified. In general, activity levels-vehicle arriv-
als, training exercises, and the frequent observa-
tion of large personnel formations-have signifi-
cantly increased in the General Support Area over
the last several months. Significant equipment and
activity identified durin the re orting period
included a new-type TEL and a
new-type canister dolly, both
probably or t e KY-15, and increased levels of
driver training, with standard SS-20 TELs on the
paved driver-training course north of the facility.
(T~~
86. I la new-type TEL was
identified in the east missile/payload handling
area of the facility. The vehicle is based on a six-
axle MAZ-type chassis
On all ac-
quired images, this vehicle has carried a canvas-
covered load simulator. The standard SS-20 TEL is
The cab configuration of
the new TEL is also different from that of the SS-20
TEL. Although the left cab extends to the front of
the vehicle, the right cab is slightly recessed and is
not contiguous with the left side of the vehicle.
Although the cab configuration
is different, the wheel spacing and overall length
of this vehicle are compatible with the six-axle
MAZ-chassis observed on the Minsk ring road in
August 1981. Based on the timing of the identifica-
tion of this new-type TEL at Kapustin Yar and at
the production facility, it probably will be used for
the KY-15 and also may be used for the SS-X-25
mobile ICBM. (T
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
9 (1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
87. a new-type mobile
missile canister dolly was identified in the original
missile/payload handling area. Two of these dol-
lies were east of the missile/payload receiving and
checkout building, and both were covered with
canvas (FILYure 21)
addition, the ends of the new-type dolly a
distinctly different from the SS-20 dolly. The en
of the new dollies have a tablike appearan
instead of a rectangular appearance. Because
the timing of their identification at the rangehe
a
these dollies also probably are for the KY-15. (T
In
re
ds
ce
of
d,
88. Facilities constructed since 1978 at t
General Support Area and probably in support
the KY-15 include a new training/administration
area, a new vehicle storage and maintenance area,
the east and west missile/payload handling areas, a
paved driver-training course, a rail-served missile/
payload transloading area, and a rail-to-road trans-
loading area. Most of the buildings and structures
at these facilities are complete, although some
were in the late stages of construction. Except for
the rail-served missile/payload transloading area,
all the new facilities are being used. (T
RCA-0110017/84 Top Secret RUFF
25X1
LOA-1
25X1
225X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
NOVAVA
M EZINOVKA
* SUHOVATIKIIA
Production
Single-Bay Garage Component Production and
Stockpiling
90. Single-bay garage components continued
to be fabricated and stockpiled at Bryansk Guided
Missile Equipment Plant II. Garage components
also continued to be stockpiled at at least three of
the seven (Figure 22) missile support rear depots
(MSRDs). Components for at least 36 single-bay
garages were delivered to the field from July
through September: nine each to Akhtyrka Mo-
bile IRBM Base 1, Akhtyrka Mobile IRBM Base 2,
Barnaul Mobile IRBM Base 5, and Yoshkar-Ola
Mobile Base 1. By the end of September, enough
components for the construction of at least 40
single-bay garages remained stockpiled at Bryansk
and the MSRDs. Counts of single-bay garages
stockpiled at the MSRDs and in the transshipment
yards at Bryansk from July through September are
listed in Table 7. (S/WN)
91. Bryansk Guided Missile Support Equip-
ment Plant II. components for at least
four single-bay garages were stockpiled at Bryansk.
Coverage was insufficient (the only coverage ob-
tained was during the period to
determine if any change in production rates
occurred. Based on the analysis of the previous 12
HALIA I4SHE
8EHDICHFV 13 SNG
GL AZOV 9 SHE
FIGURE 22. SOVIET MISSILE SUPPORT REAR DEPOTS
months, the production rate is estimated to be
approximately 4.5 to five single-bay garages a
month. The apparent low number of components
shipped to the MSRDs (only components for at
least four single-bay garages to Berdichev) sug-
gests that the components produced at Bryansk
probably went directly to the field rather than to
the MSRDs. If production rates remained consis-
tent with the previous 12 months, components for
approximately 15 SBGs would have been shipped
from Bryansk from July through September.
(S/W N)
Missile Support Rear Depots
92. Mobile missile vehicle transshipment ac-
tivity was observed at Bobrovskiy MSRD, and
single-bay garage components continued to be
stockpiled at the Balta, Berdichev, and Glazov
MSRDs, but not at Surovatikha. Components for at
least 19 garages were shipped from three of the
depots. Enough components remain stockpiled at
the depots to construct at least 36 additional
garages (Table 7). (S/WN)
Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
93. Bobrovskiy. Mobile missile vehicle trans-
shipment activity was in progress at Bobrovskiy
MSRD This was the
first sighting of SS-20 launch-associated vehicles at
the depot.
MSVs and two canvas-covered possible MSVs were
on flatbed railcars at a drive-on ramp near the
main airframe storage area. Neither the vehicles
nor the railcars were present when this area was
next imaged a
second shipment of mobile missile-associated ve-
hicles was in the same area. A canvas-covered SS-
20 TEL and eight canvas-covered SVs
were on flatbed railcars. Bobrovskiy has probably
been a storage facility for the SS-20 IRBM system
since at least 1976, when probable SS-20 missile
dollies were first identified at the facility. (S/WN)
94. It could not be determined whether the
vehicles were departing or arriving at the depot. if
the vehicles were being shipped from the depot,
they were probably being sent to one of the three
nearly complete mobile missile bases. There is
ample garage space at Bobrovskiy to store several
regiments of SS-20 equipment. Production of SS-20
vehicles probably continued in 1982 and 1983,
when no new SS-20 bases were started in the
western USSR. Bobrovskiy would be a likely place
for storage of this equipment. If the equipment
was arriving at the depot, it is most likely coming
from a production plant for storage until being
shipped to an operational base. Alternatively,
these vehicles could have come from the Yurya
SSM Complex. SS-20 vehicles had been removed
from Yurya Mobile Base 3 and loaded on railcars at
the Yurya Rail-to-Road Transfer Point
95. Balta. Coverage of Balta MSRD revealed
that three single-bay garages were shipped from
the facility Components
for at least one additional ara e were shipped
leaving compo-
nents for 14 garages stockpiled at the depot when
96. Berdichev.l I enough com-
ponents for at least 13 garages (an increase of four
were in the storage and maintenance
area of Berdichev MSRD. (S/WN)
97. Glazov. Components for three single-bay
garages were shipped from Glazov during the
period. The remaining components for nine sin-
gle-bay garages were consolidated into a new
position to decrease the amount of space that they
took up on the receiving apron. They continued to
be covered with canvas. No new single-bay garage
components were delivered to Glazov. (S/WN)
98. Surovatikha. All single-bay garage com-
ponents stockpiled at Surovatikha were shipped
from the depot, and no new garage components
arrived during the period. Components for 12
RCA-01/0017/84 Top Secret RUFF
garages were shipped three at a time
Missile Support Equipment Production and Testing
Facilities
99. Volgograd. The Volgograd Steel and Ma-
chinery Plant Krasnyy Barricada 221 will be the
assembly facility for the new 16.9-meter TEL identi-
fied at the Kapustin Yar General Support Area.
TwoMAZ six-axle chassis for the new
TEL were in the missile support equipment area of
the Ian Three canvas-covered
chassis for the SS-20 were also present.
Volgograd 221 assembles mobile-missile support
equipment for several systems including the TEL
for the SS-20, SS-21, and SS-23. TEL chassis are
shipped to Volgograd from Minsk Motor Vehicle
and Guided Missile Support Equipment Plant. A
chassis was first seen at Minsk in March
1982, although no association to a specific missile
system could be determined at that time. The
presence of three SS-20 TEL chassis at Volgograd
221 may indicate a slight increase in the pro-
duction of SS-20 TELs over the last reporting
period, when the number of MAZ six-axle chassis
present never exceeded two at any one time.
(S/W N)
100. The new TEL chassis may also
be used for the SS-X-25 TEL. The presence of
different imprints and the use of a type C single-
bay garage at Plesetsk Launch Test Site 23, a test
launch site for the SS-X-25, indicate that the chassis
for the SS-X-25 TEL is longer than the chassis for
the SS-20 TEL. (TSR)
101. The new construction and improve-
ments to Volgograd Remote Test Facility 3, which
tests missile support equipment produced at Vol-
gograd 221, continued. The construction on Pad C
consists of footings and posts for a 54-meter-long,
drive-through shed and two 20- by 20-meter
possible vehicle storage sheds. The drive-through
shed and possible vehicle storage sheds will prob-
ably be used to house equipment being tested at
the facility. The timing of their construction indi-
cates the sheds are probabl related to the TEL to
be produced from th chassis at Volgo-
grad 221. A narrow shed has been constructed
along the side of the single-bay garage in the main
support area. No test-related activity was seen.
(S/WN)
102. Remote Test Facility 1. Testing of mobile
missile-related equipment resumed at Test Facility
1 after a three-year hiatus.
MSVs, three probable
MAZ-543 chassis, and a probable BTR-60, all
individually canvas covered, were at the facili
(Figure 23).
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
LOA I
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
103. Shumerlya. The production increase in
missile support vehicles that started in early 1984 at
Shumerlya Missile Ground Support Equipment
Plant continued. Also, the probable communica-
tions van version of the MSV was
identified at the facility when two of
the vehicles were seen near t e large assembly
building in the western part of the plant. This
observation links Shumerlya with Moskva Tractor
Plant Ismailovo as the only two known plants
associated with the assembly of this version of the
SV. (S/WN)
104. Minsk. The expansion program contin-
ued at Minsk Motor Vehicle and Guided Missile
Support Equipment Plant. Construction continued
on the large fabrication/assembly building, which
is connected to the missile support equipment-
associated area of the plant. The building will
probably become operational in mid-to-late 1985.
(S/W N)
RCuerse side blank
-27-
RCA-01/0017/84 Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Short-Range Ballistic Missile
Activity
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUF
SHORT-RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILE ACTIVITY
Introduction
105. This section of the report addresses the
deployment, research and development, pro-
duction, and logistics of Soviet short-range ballistic
missile (SRBM) systems. It summarizes the status of
SCALFBOARD (SS-12) deployment in Eastern Eu-
rope (Figure 24) and involvement in antitactical
ballistic missile (ATBM) testing near Emba. Also
discussed is the recent activity observed at the
Kapustin Yar missile test range and status of SS-23
and SS-21s. An updated SRBM order of battle and
a list of acronyms and abbreviations can be found
in the appendix. (S/WN)
SCALEBOARD Activity
106. NPIC still assesses that three SCALE-
BOARD brigades are deployed in Eastern Europe,
and another in Czechoslovakia. SCALEBOARD
launchers were identified for the first time in late
July and early August 1984 in two of the brigade
areas. Two launchers were engaged in a field
exercise in the Libava Training Area near facilities
used by the brigade in Czechoslovakia
R(A-01,0017/84 Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
107. Alert launch positions were identified in
July for the SCALEBOARD brigade in Czechoslo-
vakia. Three probable battalion positions are lo-
cated in the Libava Training Area (Figure 24); each
battalion position contains six launch pads corre-
sponding to a three-battery organization, each
battery with two launchers. These positions con-
firm the fact that the brigade has 18 launchers. The
brigade probably redeployed from Yemilchino in
the Carpathian MD. All the alert launch positions
contain storage bunkers for nuclear warheads and
missile airframes. NPIC believes that duty elements
of SCALEBOARD brigades will be rotated at these
alert launch positions, and that launch battalions
and support elements of the brigades will rou-
tinely be kept in the identified garrison areas. A
second garrison was identified in the Libava train-
ing area for the brigade in Czechoslovakia.
108. SCALEBOARD equipment at the Kaban-
bay-Lake Karashek area in the Turkestan MD since
June 1984 had departed SCALE-
BOARD launches had been conducted in this area
in support of ATBM tests at the Emba Missile Test
Center. No significant SCALEBOARD activity was
seen at Kapustin Yar during this reporting period.
(S/W N)
SS-23 Activity
109. No unusual activity associated with the
SS-23 was detected during this reporting period.
The introduction of the SS-23 into operational
units has still not been observed. (S/WN)
+TSR information extracted from DIA. DDB-1923-4-82,
(U), Jun 82, pp 12, 16 (TOP SECRET
- 3(
RCA-0110017184 Top Secret RUFF
SS-21 Activity
110. An SS-21 battalion was in the Libava
Training Area of Czechoslovakia This
represents the fFrst indication of SS-21 conversion
under way in the ground forces divisions of the
Soviet Central Group of Forces. No unusual SS-21
activity was observed at Kapustin Yar. (S/WN)
Production
Petrokrepost
111. Construction continued on the new
ingredients preparation and mix building in the
north-central part of Petrokrepost Explosive and
Solid Motor Production Plant. The building was
still in the midstage of construction and probably
will not be completed until mid-1985. Tree clear-
ing was observed along the northwest edge of the
double-base propellant production area, and
grading was started in two previously cleared areas
in the composite propellant production area. This
construction has not advanced to a stage where its
function can be determined. This plant currently
produces the motors for the SS-12 and SS-12 Mod
2 SRBM.t (TSR)
Petropavlovsk
112. Plant expansion continued in the north-
ern part of Petropavlovsk Vehicle Assembly Plant.
This expansion has been under way since late 1979
and will probably be complete, at the earliest, by
late 1985. This facility is believed to be responsible
for the manufacture of components and subas-
semblies of missiles, probably the SS-12 Mod 2, SS-
21, and SS-23. The plant also assembles ground
support equipment based on the MAZ-543 chas-
sis.t (TSR)
113. No major new construction or signifi-
cant activity was observed at Petropavlovsk Missile
Assembly Facility during this reporting period. This
facility is reported to be responsible for the
production of missile airframes and probably the
final assembly of the SS-12 Mod 2 and SS-21
SRBMs.t (TSR)
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Related Activity
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
YEDROVO
KOZELSK
KOSTROMA
KOROSTEN
FIGURE 26. LOCATIONS WITH POTENTIAL SOVIET MOBILE MISSILE ASSOCIATION
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
Introduction
114. This section of the report addresses
selected unidentified construction projects which
are believed to have a potential mobile missile
association. These projects will be closely moni-
tored, with the significant changes reported in this
section until identified, after which they will be
included in the appropriate section of this report
or in other NPIC reports. A list of acronyms and
abbreviations can be found in the appendix.
(S/W N)
115. The projects in this section remained in
a relatively early stage of construction. Four areas
of interest at Korosten, Zhitomir, and Kansk have
characteristics suggesting a mobile IRBM associa-
tion, while six others at Irkutsk, Kostroma, Kozelsk
and Yedrovo may have a mobile ICBM association
(Figure 26). One facility at Yurya, Mobile Base 6,
initially thought to have a mobile missile associa-
tion, was confirmed as a mobile missile base
probably for the SS-X-25 and is now discussed in
the ICBM section of this report. (S/WN~
Korosten MRBM Launch Site 2
116. 0 trees had been cleared in the
former SS-4 launch area for two probable four-bay
garages, four probable single-bay garages, and a
perimeter security zone. A construction support
camp was nearby. footings were
present for a multiba garage and a possible
security building. a security
building and a regimental C3 facility, consisting of
an 11-bay garage and a C3 building, were under
construction. Construction of the single-bay and
four-bay garages had not started. (S/WN)
Zhitomir MRBM Launch Site 2
117.
support facility
had been cleared of trees. This type of
clearing has been seen at other deactivated
MRBM sites prior to SS-20 conversion, and usually
a C3 facility is constructed in this area. (S/WN)
Kansk
118. Two new areas of activity, possibly for
SS-20 bases, were observed. The first area, identi-
fied is approximately 9 nm south
- 31
Top Secret RUFF
of Kansk Mobile IRBM Base 3. It consisted of
extensive tree clearing and grading with a con-
struction support camp of temporary barracks and
tents also being established. Several pieces of
construction equipment were present, and a swath
for a powerline was being extended toward the
site. A second area of interest, consisting only of
tree clearing and grading, was also identified
approximately 10 nm south of the first. (S/WN)
25X1
25X1
Irkutsk
25X1
119. Construction continued at a slow pace.
25X1
a loop road had been graded within
25X1
the operations area.
founda-
25X1
tions were present for four large
rectangular
buildings in the construction support camp.
25X1
construction of one of these buildings
25X1
had progressed to the midstage. This site remained
in an early stage of construction with excavations
for footings for one seven-bay garage and clear-
ings for two other seven-bay garages in the
operations area. (S/WN)
120. I lin the operations area, a
loop road had been graded, two new linear areas
had been cleared of trees, and stanchions had
been placed in the footings of one of the seven-
bay garages. Building materials and construction
vehicles were near the three seven-bay garage
foundations. The tree clearing around the peri-
meter of the operations area for security fences,
started in March, had been completed. In the
support area, two large trenches had been dug
and construction was continuing on several build-
ings. stanchions and roof braces
had been installed in one of the seven-bay
garages. (S/WN)
121. The seven-bay garages being built at
Construction Sites 1 and 2 appear identical to
thos` seen at Yoshkar-Ola Mobile Missile Base and
Yurya Mobile Missile Base 6. This type of garage
has been identified only at mobile missile bases
that are probably for the SS-X-25.
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFF
termined when it was last observed
Construction was continuing on apartment
buildings, barracks, and administration buildings,
although no missile-associated buildings have
been identified. No rail lines were present, and no
extensive security was observed. (S/WN)
Kostroma SSM Complex
123. At Kostroma, where 40 SS-17s and 50 SS-
11s are deployed in silos, construction of the
probable SS-X-24 missile receiving and checkout
area continued. Construction of the probable SS-
X-24 MRACA is concentrated in two general areas
designated Area A and Area B. By August, a rail
spur had been installed from the main rail line into
Area A, and two large buildings and four small
buildings were under construction. The large
buildings were 48 by 25 meters and 88 by 19
meters. In Area B, footings for a large building
measuring approximately 82 by 18 meters re-
mained unchanged since April. (S/WN)
124. In the receiving area of the RTP, a
probable rail transfer shed was under construction
near the propellant handling facility. Two rows of
six footings, measuring 32 by 10 meters, were
observed adjacent to the oxidizer dispensing
building. In addition, stays that could support
canvas net material were being installed over
approximately 500 meters of the rail line in the
RTP. In the barracks area near the RTP, construc-
tion on three barracks and a messhall was com-
pleted. (S/WN)
125. When the missile receiving and check-
out area and the probable rail transfer shed in the
rail-to-road transfer point are completed, these
facilities will probably be capable of supporting
both the silo-based and rail-mobile deployment
modes of the SS-X-24 ICBM. The SS-X-24 could be
deployed in silos by 1985-1986 and in a more
survivable rail-mobile mode by 1987-1988. As yet,
no indications of a silo modification program or
rail-mobile launch facilities have been identified at
Kostroma. (S/WN)
Kozelsk SSM Complex
126. At Kozelsk, where 60 SS-19 and 50 SS-11
ICBMs are deployed, the construction of the new
component storage area in the NWHF has re-
mained virtually unchanged since March 1983. The
purpose of this construction remains undeter-
mined; however, the apparent low priority as-
signed by the Soviets to this project is not
indicative of new system deployment. Only signifi-
cant developments at Kozelsk will be included in
subsequent reports. (S/WN)
Yedrovo SSM Complex
127. At Yedrovo, where 110 SS-17 ICBMs are
deployed, probable SS-X-24-related construction
continued on two buildings in the RTP. The large
rail-in, high-bay building under construction is a
probable SS-X-24 receiving, inspection, and check-
out building. The high-bay portion of the building
is rail served and measures 60 by 12 meters. The
adjoining low-bay portion, 60 by 6 meters, will
probably house technical support equipment for
inspection and checkout. Footings for a second
building, measuring 32 by 11 meters, are adjacent
to the RIC building. This construction is probably
related to silo deployment of the SS-X-24. The
limited scale of construction tends to rule out
deployment of the rail-mobile version of the SS-X-
24, which apparently requires more extensive
handling facilities such as those at Plesetsk and
under construction at Kostroma. No indications of
silo modification have been observed at Yedrovo.
(S/W N)
RCA-0110017184 Top Secret RUFF
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Appendix
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T00060R000300720001-2
LIDA
DYATLOVO
SLONIM
RUZHANY
PRUZHANV
KIV ERTSY
SOKAL
LUTSK
OSTROG
BELOKOROVICHI
USOVO
MOZYR
RECHITSA
SMORGON
POSTAVY
POLOTSK
GRESK
/ KONKOVICHI
YURYA
AKHTVRKA
KROLEVETS
VERKHNYAYA SALDA
KANSK
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T00060R000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Top Secret RUFI
Introduction
Al. This section of the report contains the
significant baseline information that NPIC consid-
ers most accurate and best suited for Soviet mobile
missile analysis. Included are the basic operational
characteristics of the weapon systems, dimensions
of significant associated structures, abbreviations
for standard terminology, and basic installation
information, including an updated, imagery-de-
rived order of battle for Soviet SRBMs. Also in-
cluded are two tables that summarize construction
and C3 activity at deployed SS-20 IRBM bases
(Figure Al). Recommendations and comments re-
garding this section, as well as suggestions for
items to be included in future appendixes, are
welcome. (S/WN)
Acronyms and Abbreviations
AAD azimuth alignment device
APRTB army mobile rocket
technical base
C3 command, control, and
communications
can/cap canister/capsule
cp/bnk command post/bunker
CSF complex support facilities
CTA crew training area
DDTA dispersal/driver training area
ERC emergency rocket communications
ESF East Support Facility
FPRTB Front mobile rocket
technical base
FTA field training area
FTX field training exercise
GSA general support area
GSE ground support equipment
INF intermediate nuclear forces
IR infrared
LAD launch-assist device
LCF launch control facility
LRCM long-range cruise missile
LRP launch reference position
LTF launch test facility
LTS launch test site
MD military district
MHF missile handling facility
MOB mobile missile base
MRACA missile receiving and checkout area
MRAC missile receiving and checkout
MRB missile-ready building/bunker
MSE missile support equipment
MSRD missile support rear depot
MSTC missile/space test center
MSV missile support van
MTC missile test center
NPHF nuclear payload handling facility
NWHF nuclear warhead handling facility
NWSA nuclear weapons storage area
ORPD independent rocket transport
battalion
PBV postboost vehicle
PGCS propulsion guidance control section
PHF payload handling facility
PRTB mobile rocket technical base
rail-TEL rail-mobile transporter-
erector-lau ncher
RIC receiving, inspection, and checkout
RIM receiving, inspection, and
maintenance
RISA receiving/inspection/storage area
RTB rocket technical base
RTP rail-to-road transfer point
SBG single-bay garage
SMRA silo materials receiving area
TEL transporter-erector-launcher
T-L transporter-loader
UHF/VHF ultrahigh frequency/
very high frequency
RCA-01/0017/84 Top Secret RUFF
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied
Iq
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Table Al. Summary of Construction at Deployed Mobile Missile Complexes
O47
PP MULTIBAY SUPPORT ~S ~J~ yJ?4
GARAGES
RTP REMARKS/COMMENTS
~ J ~ ~ c, 0 tia
9-BAY 10-BAY 11-BAY
0? ay 0 0~ 0Z 0~ 02 0~ 0~ ~P
-Yc+PJO-~' 0 -Z' -Y -Y G0J`G0J`1/0-Y
DROVYANAYA
Base 1
Base 2
Base 3
Base 4
Base 5
Remote 1
KANSK
Base 1
Base 2
BARNAUL
Base 1
Base 2
Base 3
Base 4
NOVOSIBIRSK
Base 1
Base 2
Base 3
Base 4
Base 5
Base 6
VERKHNYAYA SALDA
Base 1
Base 2
Base 3
Base 4
Base 5
9 - 3 3 - - - - - 2
9 - 3 3 - - - - - 2
9 - 3 3 - - - - - 2
9 - 4 3 - - - - - 2
9 - 3 3 - - - - - 2
5 3
5 - -
5 3 - 1 - - - 1
5 3 - 1 - - - 1
9 5 3 1 - - -
1
0 5 - 3 - 1 - -
9 - 4 3 - - - - - 2
9 - 4 3 - - - - - 2
9 - 4 3 - - - - - 2
9 - 4 3 - - - - - 1
9 - 4 3 - - - - - 2
9 - 5 3--- 1- 1
9 - 3 3
9 - 3 3
9 - 3 3
9 - 3 3
9 - 3 3
Five bldgs still ucon in support area
Support area
2 - Complete SBG at RTP 24 housetrailers remain; footings for new bldg
2 - - - - - - -
0
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
YURYA
Base 1
Base 2
Base 3
Base 4
Base 5
DYATLOVO
LIDA
POLOTSK 1
POLOTSK 2
POSTAVY
PRUZHANY1
RUZHANY1
SLONIM
SMORGON 1
SMORGON 2
AKHTYRKA 1
AKHTYRKA 2
GRESK
KIVERTSY 2
KONKOVICHI
KOZHANOVICHI
KROLEVETS 1
KROLEVETS 2
LEBEDIN
LUTSK
MOZYR
OSTROG 1
RECHITSA
9 - 3 3 0
9 - 3 3 0
3 3 0
9 - 3 3 0
9 - 3 3 0
9 - 4 3 -
9 - 4 3 -
9 - 3 3 -
9 - 3 3
9 - 3 3 -
4 -
4 3
9 - 4 3
9 - 4 3 -
9 - 4 3 -
Dyatlovo NPH TP assoc when SS-4
1 - 0 - 0 - - o assoc RTP
1 2 - 1 - 1 1 RTP expansion New prob ten-bay garage ucon in support area
1 0 0 0 - -
2 1 - 1 - 1 - - Multibay garage ucon in NPHF
1 - 0 - 0 0
2 0 1 - 1
9 - 4 3 -
9 - 4 3 -
9 - 3 3
9 - 3 3 -
9 - 4 3 -
4
9 - 4 3 -
9 - 4 3 -
9 - 3 3 -
4 - 2
1 - 1 - Kivertsy NPHF
3 1 1 -
3 - 1 1 -
- - 1 - 0
1 - Lebedin NPH
1 0 - 0 - 0
3 - 1 - 1 - 1
2 1 1 - 1
- 0 - 0 0
0 - 0 - 0
0 0 - 0
'The former SS-7 ICBM complexes in the central and eastern USSR currently contain NPHFs under construction or complete at their RTPs; each
NPHF consists of one high two-bay technical support building and a clerestory building.
Base is in of constr
Base is in of constr
Two bldgs in support area
New bldg ucon in support area
-25X1
LJ/\ I
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T00060R000300720001-2
Table A2. C3 Activities at Deployed Mobile Missile-Associated Facilities as of 30 September 1984
C3-Associated Structures
and Mobile Antennas
Fixed Antenna Inventory
a~ r~ ~ ,w cr ~P
m m ~ ~,' J? J o R h ~h c~ a~
G~' L~ m~a c" c P P b o` c?~ c?y ors c? .c C
10 J0,
.40
4
hoc 4.? c`' 4V
~b R .46
i+oc ~a~ F~?c c~FF o: a 0 o~ti`yc rho
CP/bnk
1 - yes 2' -
-
6 - 3 - WOOD BINE and PARK DRIVE 2.5X1
1 - -
-
2 1 4 2 Occasionally observed
25X1
Rad rcv
Rad xm
r
t~
1 - - -
3 - - 2
;25X1
Mobile Base 1 Hq
Mobile Base 2 Hq
Mobile Base 3 Hq
Mobile Base 4 Hq
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
2 1 - yes - Two on three-bay garages
2 1 - yes - Two on three-bay garages
2 yes - Two on three-bay garages
4 Yes - Two on three-bay garages
225X1
f?
C
Mobile Base 5 Hq
yes
yes
2 yes - Two on three-bay garages
-T1
T
KANSK IRBM DIV HQ (no BE No)
Kansk IRBM Regts
Mobile Base 1 (no BE No)
Mobile Base 2 (no BE No)
- Ten-bay garage; two on five-bay garages
- Late stages of construction; ten-bay garage
25
X1
25X1
Barnaul IRBM Regts
Mobile Base 1 Hq
1 - - - -
yes
2 - - - - - - - - Nine-bay garage 25X1
Mobile Base 2 Hq
1 - - - -
yes
2 - - - - - - 2 - Nine-bay garage
Mobile Base 3 Hq
1 - - - -
yes
2 - - - - - - 2 - One nine-bay and one 11-bay garage
Mobile Base 4 Hq
ucon - ucon - - -
-
- - - - - - - -
CP/bnk
8 2 1
Rad rcv
1 2 2 - - 1
Rad xm
Novosib
2 7
Mobile Base 1 H
yes
2 -
Mobile Base 2 H
yes
2 -
Mobile Base 3 H
yes
2 -
Mobile Base 4 H
yes
2 -
Mobile Base 5 H
yes
2 -
Mobile Base 6 H
yes
2 2
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T00060R000300720001-2
 CP/bnk
Rad rcv
Had xm
Mobile Base 1 Hq
Mobile Base 2 Hq
Mobile Base 3 Hq
Mobile Base 4 Hq
Mobile Base 5 Hq
YOSHKAR-OLA ICBM DIV
CP/bnk/hd
Had rcvr'
Rad xmtr
Had xmtr NE/bnk'
Yoshkar-Ola Mobile Missile Regis
Mobile Base 1~
YURYA IRBM DIV
CP/bnk
Rad rcv
Rad xm
Yurya IRBM Regis
Mobile Base 1 Hq
Mobile Base 2 Hq
Mobile Base 3 Hq
Mobile Base 4 Hq
Mobile Base 5 Hq
CP/bnk (
Rad rcvr
Had xmt
Dyatlovo IRBM Regt
Mobile Base Hq (no BE No)
Support bunker'
Rad xmt
Lida IRBM Regt
Mobile Base Hq
Slonim IRBM Regt
Mobile Base Hq
Support bunker'
Rad xmtr'
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
2 - 1' 9 4 1 - - -
1 - - - - 3 2 2 - 2 2
6 - 4 1 -
1 - - - - yes yes 2
1 - - - - yes yes 2
1 - - - - - yes 2
- yes 4
- yes 2
yes 2
yes 2
yes 2
yes 2
yes 2
7 2 -
i 3 - 8 - - 1
9 3 1
1 - - 3 8
8 -
4 1 3
2 - 2' - - 2
4 - 4' 3 - 1
- yes 2 2 - - - - - 1
yes yes 2 2 - - -
4 - - 2 - - -
- Type C satellite commo station complete
2
Double rhombic antennas
Two rhombic antennas ucon
- Formerly an MRBM regt CP/bnk (same BE No)
- Formerly an MRBM regt xmtr (same BE No)
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
9Y1
25X1
25X1
2DA1
H
25X1
25X1
125X1
C
T
T
225X1
25X1
25X1
25X1
LOA-1
25X1
25X1
25X1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/16: CIA-RDP85T0006OR000300720001-2
Table A2. C3 Activities at Deployed Mobile Missile-Associated Facilities as of 30 September 1984 (Continued)
C3-Associated Structures Fixed Antenna Inventory
and Mobile Antennas
IV 46,
0 c` y e h m 00' a~
C~ G P PM 0 C? Q~ ~~ Cc QC ti' Comments
41, .0 4? `o0 ?'0a ~ PO
r~Q It. R ~ ~~ T a c`
c ?c