TRANSFER OF THE CIVIL SPACE REMOTE SENSING SYSTEMS TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85M00363R001102400018-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 13, 2007
Sequence Number: 
18
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 25, 1983
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85M00363R001102400018-9.pdf190.48 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2007/09/13: CIA-RDP85M00363RO01102400018-9 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON January 25, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: THE CABINET COUNCIL ON COMMERCE AND TRADE SUBJECT: Transfer of the Civil Space Remote Sensing Systems to the Private Sector Issue Should the Administration twaatber satelliteisystemsytor the civil operational land and e Background The current U.S. program in operational civil space remote sensing consists of a single land satellite and four operational weather satellites in orbit. A number of private entities have expressed interest in assuming responsibility for portions of the civil space remote sensing system. Some firms are interested in the land satellite systems; another is interested in both the land and weather satellite systems. Foreign governments have recognized the value of this technology. Civil space remote sensing systems are being advanced by France, Japan, the European Space Agency, India, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the Soviet Union. To date, only France has actually invested in a land remote sensing system (SPOT); others have invested only in weather systems. There is agreement among all parties that a self-supporting, successful private venture or ventures can evolve in land, and weather. The Government provides a steady market for weather data. The value of land satellite data to the U.S. Government has not been rigorously established. Federal user agencies have been happy to use data now provided at subsidized costs, but, if required to pay the full cost of land satellite data, they indicate an intention to consider other means to meet their needs. Approved For Release 2007/09/13: CIA-RDP85M00363RO01102400018-9 _" "_ - - Approved For Release 2007/09/13: CIA-RDP85M00363R001102400018-9 Other than Federal users, the land satellite data market has not grown as rapidly as it could have because of limitations on the Government in developing fd orela s nd remote ng-term outlook appears international growing and e the o lothe market sensing data is s 8 rivate sector is given the promising, provided an aggressive p opportunity to develop and expand the market base for this product. more than $14 billion The O.S. Government is currently spending pet year on the civil and national defense space programs. of enttbudget includes million i i h nominally $1S0- d s i curr c wh s tion Adm nistra remote sensing. The term operation and replacement of the civil funding for the long the current policy weather satellite. For land remote sensing, purchased until 1988. are expected which h last were is to continue with the two Thus, th this Admi operating costs and does not include Thus, the budget has only oto procure additional land satellites. additional Federal funding The budget assumes that any future land iremotensensing systems would have to be owned/operated by a p The United States has created high-te1achnndology g field, but remote sensing acltioseon its s taken to peserve it. Transfer to a private uitnlecsous could entity without any government assurinces would preferable and a commercial will be actively sought. However, p stem may involve some form of government-assured a brief time, e.g., a guaranteed minimum purchase market for or system m agreement, until the private entity is firmly established. The level of need for such support, if any, will be considered carefully in the evaluation of proposals actually submitted. Federal interests will require a continuing oversight tosany private entity involved in civil spaceuremotersensing,aied out outlined in the Outer Space Treaty, with interagency coordination and contractuassprovisions between the Government and the andaforeignsupplier, relations concerns are defense, , intelligence, satisfied. two principalextensively rev options for The Cabinet Council naasmidentifiedTrade reviewweedd th the issue and has consideration: Approved For Release 2007/09/13: CIA-RDP85M00363R001102400018-9 Approved For Release 2007/09/13: CIA-RDP85M00363R001102400018-9 rivate sector lll Option 1: Transfer to the I!!b4r100t1f0T iDt ss Or the the transfer o theecivil The Department of Commerce will oversee operational weather and land, satellites . guided b the sector as soon as possible. The transfer will be g y following principles: (1) and foreign policy concerns wgu'ld be National security legislation, appropriately addressed in preparing legitslheatpirion, private requesting proposals, andf=t overseeing entity or entities. The selection of the private entity would occur under_ (2) competitive conditions. Private firms would have the option of bidding separately for the land or weather b ion for J preparing a joint submiss satellite system or pprogram justifications would both. The financial and p g be presented in such a manner thateparate submissions can be appropriately compared to joint s (3) The Department of Commerce would establish asible. inter-agency coordinating body as soon as possible. o Stimulates technology development by the private sector in response to new market demands and expands the role of private industry. o Demonstrates commitment to the private sector role in spacee o Reduces the size and scope of Government activities. Disadvantage entityprior o May require increasing Federa=ivatefunding firmly h e p commitment levels until t established. b com etitive ILLEGIB ILLEGIB ------ - Approved For Release 2007/09/13: CIA-RDP85M00363R001102400018-9 ' - - Approved For Release 2007/09/13: CIA-RDP85M00363RO01102400018-9 4 p !cl er ational land remote seasin s stems ose nominall b 1988 (or sooneivi11,1! r l weather satelliteasunderin to Late it over) and retain the c Government control. 0 Lion 2: Continue the current u 15 i the Government to a d et olic of brie in the Advantage . o Option is within current budget. Disadvantages o Only minimally reduces the size and scope of Government. o Would result in the relinquishment of land remote sensing to foreign competitors by U.S.. Decision Option 1 Transfer to the private sector, via competitive means the current operational civil weather and land satellites. Separate bids would be permitted for h or singleibid, or a firm could Council on Commerce and Trade for all. Option 1 unanimously supported by the Cabinet Option 2 Continue the current budget policy of bringing the operational land remote sensing systems in the Government-to a close nominally by 1988 or sooner if private industry is willing to take it over, and retain the civil weather satellites under Government control. L:nai rmn- Cabinet Council on Commerce and Trade cdim Baldrige ILLEGIB ILLEGIB --- Approved For Release 2007/09/13: CIA-RDP85M00363RO01102400018-9 - -? -