C.I.A. SAYS SOVIET CAN ALMOST DO WITHOUT IMPORTS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85M00363R000601440073-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
January 4, 2017
Document Release Date: 
April 15, 2008
Sequence Number: 
73
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 9, 1983
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85M00363R000601440073-1.pdf132.05 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/04/15: CIA-RDP85MOO363ROO0601440073-1 ,GRTICLE APPEARED NEW YORK TINES 9 JANUARY 1983 C.I.A. Says Soviet Can Almost Do Without By $ERNARD GWERTZMAN Special to The New York Times WASHINGTON, Jan. 8- The Central Intelligence Agency, in a study of the Soviet economy, - concludes that the Soviet Union's ability to live without im- ports is much greater than that of most, possibly all, other industrialized econo- mies. The report, delivered to the Joint Economic Committee of Congress on Dec. 1 by Henry Rowen, chairman of the C.I.A.'s National Intelligence Coun- cil, seems to support the argument that American trade embargoes against the Soviet Union have only limited effect. The Reagan Administration has sought to tighten Western controls on trade to the Soviet Union to bring politi- cal pressure on Moscow, a policy often at odds with European allies and with some American businessmen. Capital, Technology and Food The C.I.A. report said that for the last decade the Soviet Union has used trade with the West to help modernize its economy and make it more efficient. It said that the Russians had relied on im- ports of capital and technology to in- crease or maintain production of some raw materials and that food imports had "become critical" to maintaining a quality diet. Imports of grain and other agricul- Imports from the West, Mr. Rowen re- said, "can play an important role j po lieving critical shortages, spurring_ technological progress and generally f improving Soviet economic peform- I Mr. Rowen said the C.I.A. agreed ante." But he added that "the ability of 1 with Mr. Proxmire that "confusion sur- the Soviet economy to remain viable in I rounding the Soviet economy abounds." than that of most, possibly all, other in- dustrialized economies." "Consequently,". he concluded, "the susceptibiity of the Soviet Union to eco- nomic leverage tends to be limited." The Soviet Union has always put great emphasis on self-sufficiency. This dates from the earliest days after the "Western observers have tended to describe Soviet economic performance as `poor' or `deteriorating' at a time when Soviet defense spending continues to rise, overall Soviet gross national product in real terms continues to in- crease and Soviet G.N.P. is second in size only to that of the United States," he said, noting the apparent contradici- countries did not recognize the Soviet As a result of recent declines in the regime, and it continued as a result of rate of growth, the gap between per- the isolation the country experienced in World War II. Mr. Rowen's report was prepared at the request of Senator William Prox- mire, Democrat of Wisconsin. The Senator, who is vice chairman of the subcommittee on international trade, finance and security economics, hgd asked for "a balanced assessment" of the strengths and. weaknesses of the Soviet economy. This was the second C.I.A. report in a month to point out strengths in the Soviet economy. tural products, it said, meant primarily to prevent a decline in meat consump. tion, cost the Russians $12 billion in 1981, or 40 percent of their hard-cur. rency purchases that year. But Mr. Rowen said that "despite the large-scale expansion in agricultural imports, the Soviet Union remains basi- cally self-sufficient with respect to food." He said the average Soviet citizen . consumes hpu 3,W calories a day, as against 3,520'f an American. The re- port showed that the Soviet diet consists' of far more grain and potatoes than the American diet, but less fish and meat and less sugar. And Mr. Rowen said that grain production in the Soviet Union "is more than sufficient to meet consumer demand for bread and other cereal products." The report said trade with the West amounted to only 5 percent of the Soviet gross national product. But it seemed to agree with some Administration policy makers when it said the Russians would have to import 15 million to 20 million tons of steel pipe in the next seven years to build the pipelines it has planned, and will need "sophisticated" exploration equipment for its oil and natural gas fields. The Administration has tried to block those exports in particular, provoking feuds with Western govern-, 1 ments that have contracted to provide ! the equipment. The Soviet gross national product in 1982 was estimated at $1.6 trillion, or ; $6,000 per-capita, roughly 55 percent of .the American gross national product. The C.I.A. estimated Soviet gold re- serves at 200 million troy ounces, giving I )it 35 percent of the world total. Produc- tion in 1981 was estimated at 325 tons and its stock at about 1,900 tons, worth over $25 billion at current prices. The report said a major weakness in the economy was the declining growth of the work force, with only 9 million ex- pected to join in this decade as against 19 million in the 1970's. Agriculture remains the weakest link. Grain production achieved a record high of 237 million tons in 1978 but has not reached 190 million tons since then. The report also highlighted problems in poor administration, bot- tlenecks in industry, an overworked railroad system and depletion of many mineral reserves. energy as a whole was increasing, with oil up by about 1 percent and coal 2 per- cent in the past year. The Russians have also improved their trade with the West, cutting their deficit from $4 bil- lion in 1981 to $2 billion in 1982. formance and expectations, and the lack of economic efficiency, "the record compiled by the Soviet economy in recent years has indeed been poor," he said. "Results that are unsatisfactory when measured by this yardstick, how- ever, do not mean that the Soviet econ- omy is losing its viability as well as its dynamism," the C.I.A. official said. "In fact, we do not consider an eco- nomic `collapse' - a sudden and sus- tained decline in G.N.P. - even a re- mote possibility," he said. The- C.I.A. projects, he said, that Soviet economic growth "will remain slow but positive," averaging 1 to 2 per- cent "for the foreseeable future," al- though per capita consumption might level off or drop slightly. Energy Production Rises Mr. Rowen said that natural gas pro- duction had continued to increase at a rapid rate, 8 percent in 1982, and that Approved For Release 2008/04/15: CIA-RDP85MOO363ROO0601440073-1