OFFICE COMMENTS ON 'COMMENTS ON IG SURVEY'

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP85G00105R000100130021-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 30, 1998
• Sequence Number: 21
• Publication Date: March 16, 1967
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2002/06/18 : CIA-RDP85G00105R000100130021-7
16 March 196T
MOORAN] 4 FOR., Acting Deputy Director for I telligence
SUBJECT' : office Coeze nts on "Comments on IG Survvy"
s acceptable as stated; no revisions proposed.
Approve revised recommendations; support proposal to create
Collection Guidance Advisory Group; no revisions proposed.
Strong reservation on pare (b) (2) of revised Recommendation
No. 1, which "recoznds in favorable terms" consideration of
a proposal that DCID 1/2 defines is eat which do not
warrant intelligence collection. such proposal were
adopted in re-writing DCID 1/2, OCI'a ability---ate that of
the Agency--to respond affirmatively to problems and questions
worldwide would be seriously affected.
BCC comment: The language of the revised recommendation reads
"n prep ing the revisions, the committee should consider the
desirability of the following:... (2) That DCID No. 1/2 appropri-
ately defixze those subjects a geographic a to which normal
and continuing intelligence collection and research are appli-
cable, and those which do not warrant the development or allo-
cation of intelligence resources." I did not construe this as
a reconendation in favorable terms. Wirer, to met the OCI
reservation, I propose to return to the language of the original
rwomen tOfl (t' ...other sub a ets of proper concern to Intelli-
gence which do not affect our national survival.") and drop the
mention of geographic areas in the revised recoi mendation and
in the cozaenta.
Approved For Release 2002/06/18 : CIA-RDP85GO0105R000100130021-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/18 : CIA-RDP85G00105R000100130021-7
Collectors are not represented on OW., but only subject to
being invited to attend Group meetings "as appropriate."
"The collector's input to the Group's reomaendations should
be more positive: than that implied by the pent wording."
13CC ont : The membership of the proposed Advisory Group__
s ; OCI, GRR, ONE, OSI--reflects the fact that the
point of departure for most of the
guidance of concern to DDI and jMW m n of collection
,fast the producing offices think Ont start
4th thOY Want, heir they go about
getting it, and 'What role CGS has to play in this. DC8 and
FBIS as collectors and OCR and IAS as processors obviously
are very important, their pence at Group meetings may be
needed own, but I don't think they should be members of the
Group, at least at the outset. If experience
cdes can be made. augg+ea g other
BCC ctageettt : No, for reasons given above.
a) Who does CGAG advise, the DDI or Chief, CG8?
BCC camper t: It meets under the chairmanship of Chief, CGS
to ~a? v' se on problem arising in the collectooa guidance
process. Action: the following wozd.s ( ear
limd) added to
A
~ 2 of .,
"
~
4
4a
~
t
and 'n.. **oestablisbed for the advice
under the chair
manship or...
b) In various rec rnations, rather than direct Chief, CGS
to take action "in collaboration with the Cam," the charge
should be placed on C$ief, CGS alone.
BCC comment : There's no doubt from the language where the
responsibility lieut.' it Is Chief, DG3 'who is directed to act.
I think it is 1 t it in terms of the politics o
both bets MW and DDI and between the hf problem,
Mid CGS, that the Idea of collaborative P~ucix~g offices
wive action in problem solving
be retained. I raor-a, -u--- . __ _ - -- w - _
Approved For Release 2002/06/18 : CIA-RDP85GO0105R000100130021-7
 Approved For Release 2002/06/18 : CIA-RDP85G00105R000100130021-7
c) in addition to periodic meetings between PI Staff aaand. COS
as suggested in restatement of No. 9, Personnel exchanges
should take place On a two-year tour basin.
25X1A9a
BCC cosm eeuut : 0 also feels that a personnel exchange urasna
o be considered. He proposed =Wmg the restate nt para-
graph 1 and adding a pars 2 along these lines : "The Chief, COB
and the Chief, FI Staff consider long-term rotation of officers
between the REB and the KRB." I propose to add such a pares.
d) A matter worth exploring is the desirability of separating
the two essentially independent functions performed by CGS :
(1) guiding collectors, said (2) supporting the CIA Member of
USIB e t associated activities.
25X1A9a
BCC coaneT t : adds, "This need not be an issue in the
r:r+esent evere se. I ate. Novever.. you may want to ask
to elaborate tat he has in mind and how it might wad.
OCIt should be represented on CG AG.
BOC c : See co rent under DCS above.
b) CGS should be maimed by personnel from producing, offices
rotating in on a two-year basis, the staffing to be handled by
the 1)1)I Career Service Board. Reason: to prevent staff officers
from becoming sepeaurated from line production problems.
BCC comment: Something for Chief.. CGS and CGAG to consider,
SUE not a part of the present exercise.
c) a No. 13, initiation of collection guides should not rest
solely with Chief, CGS.
BCC coaamment: Wording revised to read "...direct Chief, CGS, in
co .ration with GOAD, to ux ; (vice initiate) the prepa-
ration of collection guides as needed..."
No sustions for revision.
No suggestions for revision.
Approved For Release 2002/06/18 : CIA-RDP85GO0105R000100130021-7