COMMENT ON JIIRG REPORT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85G00105R000100110009-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 17, 1998
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 9, 1966
Content Type: 
MISC
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85G00105R000100110009-3.pdf202.56 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDPB 0100110009-3 25X1A9a t J 9 August 1966 M2EE ON JZIRO REPORT 1. C The reasoning and motives which led JIIRR to recommend that imagery ex- ploitation be coordinated and managed by a USIB authority are sound. I cannot agree, however, that a new separate USIB committee (COMER) should be established to exercise that authority. The followi.n8 considerations have caused me to disagree: a. I believe that coordination end management of all aspects of overhead reeonnaieeence should be subordinated to a Dingle authority responsible to UST9. In our experience with satellite reconnaissance programs and their A products, targeting and exploitation Ore sufficiently interrelated to demand subordination to central management. Th3 fact that exploitation has been managed separately from the bueineeo of COb'4OR in the past has been one cause of the growing need for exploitation management. It can be argued by others that two separate and equal USIB committees (COMDR and C(t4EX) could operate in concert. I believe they Approved For Release 1999109/25,.: CIA-RDP85000105R000100110009-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85GO0105R000100110009-3 probably could in a etetlo A*t,*tion in vh'ich tai only routine buuineea was hoing tv naocte4.. 3ut as tOtlite raoonnsioecncs is a dynsmio bueineee and vtll COZatt.uao,.a a ba,so tot' a long time to togas. b. Perhaps the real reason for ms's recom idation for a C MM X vas that C OB, as presently organized, would find it difficult to cope with both targeting and exploitation responsibilities. I thin% this would be eo, and I agre* w1th the reasoning that two separate Croups ehou1s conduct targeting and exploitation respectively. But, the two groups would function moot effectively If they aorkad under the supervision of a single authority, a single authority responsible to the DM and USIB. I do not favor constituting a new committee or the CCNIOR as thin eeuthoiity. 'hile C( ?20R has wwked acrrpriciaglyy vel1, it has shorn the usual weeekueecees of the committee approach to policy deoieions and operational manage- ment. 3P we are to introduce exploitation r aagement w A if it Is to be conducted in teamwor% with targeting, then both functions should be conducted ? a !3 %WWAM.-Y 9t 0 ro n-4 mna~pr as r=ant and expert staff's. :,CJA-RDP85GO0.105R000100110009-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP_85G00105R000100110009-3 .g_ 2. t would recommend, thsx'efore, thats A. A aetellita reconn iesance tanager or director be appointed by and directly responsible to the DCI and U3IB. A deputy should also be appointed, with BMIB agreement that a CIA officer and a military officer would be rotated in the two positions. b. U ro permanent and ftll-tim* staffs be eatdbliehed umder the wanavrp we for targeting (rep stint CMOOA and its Photo Working 4roupI, and one for exploitation (replacing ADCti, ate). The tva staffs each would be composed of oi'ficern from the member aCcncica o U3IB, with the addition of an tO officer to the targeting stasff# and an VIC officer to the exploitation staff. ~. An additionnl edvantege to this arraneement mould be that as authority organized along ouch command Lines would op=to store effectively in time of war under the Defense Department and Jp. Another erdvantages would be that CIA at least could aoei.ga to the two otaffa office w'ho were esqnrienced in and aenmiti.ve to the changing needs of lt-'oduuing intelligence otti es. Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85G0,10iR00(h;;1O0110009-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85GO0105R000100110009-3 4. mica It is suggested that the OPICa should be under the management of IPIC, and that, In whole or in part, they should be staffed by NPIC, 17PIC memagement and staffing would ensure that the quality of work would be uniformly high, with IIPIC being in a position to choose and supply the beet of training and equipment, and able to rotate experienced personnel between NPIC headquarters and OPTCs as needed. no-hours The report states (P? ?, pare 6) that imagery interpretation mQnhours 25X9A1 25X9A1 expende4 for national. needs during Flt 1965 wares Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85GO0105R000100110009-3 =a is the !hind of Problem that could be attacked by a permanent eXloitation r angement staff, but would be difficult to handle in a committee oitumtion. 6. ;ncreased Requirement There are two additional points in support of the HIM finding (p. 9, Para ).3) that the magnitude of the effort required from 1967 to 1971 will be subotantielly- Less than forecasts 25X9A1 Even the estimate that there will be a cos hatlve increase on the order of 30 percent over the next five year period should be considered with Caution and doubt. An coverage, photo gmlitr end expertise in interpretation have progressed over the past three years, intelligence problem open have narrowed. c or; kse,I9 9/Q9/25 ; CIA-RDP85 Q0105R000100110009-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85GO0105R000100110009-3 It Is reasonable to expect that caajor technical etdvancee owing into being will facilitate feher the finding of needed Answers, and increase the rapidity with Vhich new types of targsta art covered and satiafaotorily analyzed, I1 w uses and needs for satellite rcconnaiaearrct will develop as capab!Uties improve, but we should be able to transfer to these some of the resources devoted to past uses and mods. Approved For. Release 1999JQ9/25 CIA-RDP85GO0105R000100110009-3