CI THEME PACKAGE

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP85B01152R000500580001-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 22, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 4, 2008
• Sequence Number: 1
• Content Type: MEMO

Approved For Release 2008/06/04: CIA-RDP85BO1152R000500580001-1 T? '~ istry R
1. Several days ago, you asked us to prioritize the ingredients
of our Counterintelligence Initiative. As you are aware, we feel that
we in the DDA are far behind the power curve in the acquisition of
resources to support the CI effort. Both the Offices of Security and
Communications have major roles to play in this endeavor and find
themselves behind in the acquisition of the necessary tools to do the
job. Since the CI Theme Initiative does indeed represent our initial
request for resources in this area, and since we have already scaled
down and stretched out this package, it is with great reluctance that
we provide you with the following priority listing.
OC IBM System III Replacement
OTE Ammunition Bunker Lighting & Fence
OC Electronic SEDD & RF Intrusion Alarm
OC Data Security Modules
OS Positions & Funding (Pos. 6)
OC Enhanced Data Encryption Standard
OS ACMR Procurement
OS IPMS Fluke Controller (Hq area)
OS R&D Funding
New Destruction
New Locking Devices
Document Taggin
OTE Perimeter Fence
OS ITC - Baseband LAN
OC File Encryption Modules
OC Internal Tempest Lab (Pos. 8)
OC Autemp III
OC Tempest Receiver
OC Retain ARC Contract Level
OTE Gatehouse Construction Improvement
OC Shielding Techniques (Pos. 1)
1 - DDA Subject
1 -- DDA Chrono
1 - DDA/MS Subject
1 - DDA/MS Chrono
New Firehouse/Guardhouse
Headquarters Compound
Power Plant Headquarters
Obsolete Safe Replacement
25X1
25X1
Approved For Release 2008/06/04: CIA-RDP85BO1152R000500580001-1
i
 OC Isotope Detection System
OS Polygraph Machines
**Could scale-back to
***Could scale-back to
which would slow down but not stop R&D.
which would mean only 400 of 1500 safes
2. It should be noted that one of our Offices initially refused
to prioritize their resources within the CI Theme Initiative because
they strongly believed that all elements were essential to the
initiation of our efforts. It was only after our insistence that they
listed their portion of the Initiative in a ranking order. Again, we
would hope that our CI Theme Initiative will remain intact so that we
can successfully fulfill our responsibilities in this area.