(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84S00553R000200130003-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
18
Document Creation Date: 
January 12, 2017
Document Release Date: 
June 30, 2011
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 1, 1983
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84S00553R000200130003-1.pdf939.23 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 China-United States: Interdependence Growing Economic Political Implications of EA 83-10107 June 1983 Copy 2 0 8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Intelligence China-United States: Political Implications of Growing Economic Interdependence This paper was prepared by I (China Division, in cooperation with the Systems Development Staff, Office of East Asian Analysis. It was coordinated with the National Intelligence Council. OEA Comments and queries are welcome and may be directed to the Chief, Development Issues Branch, Secret EA 83-10107 June 1983 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Secret China-United States: Political Implications of Growing Economic Interdependence Key Judgments China's foreign policy has long been a complicated brew of realpolitik, Information available xenophobic nationalism, and economic calculation. Security considerations as of 15 June 1983 have been the primary force shaping China's foreign policy, but there have was used in this report. been periods, such as the early 1950s, when the PRC's need for economic ties abroad have been an influential factor.-The bitter experience with the Soviet Union, however, convinced the Chinese that they must avoid becoming economically reliant on any one country and accounts for Beijing's current efforts to spread its trade and investment relations over a broad range of Western countries. We believe the importance of economic factors in China's foreign policy is likely to increase substantially over the coming decade as trade, foreign investment, and other commercial relationships with the outside world expand. Some of these arrangements would be vulnerable if Beijing's domestic politics shift radically in a post-Deng era. New economic challenges, however, are emerging that should make commercial dealings with the West more imperative for the Chinese-particularly for export markets, as a source of advanced technology, and for assistance in energy development. The Chinese may need Western help more than they currently anticipate. Beijing expects that its economy will grow during the latter half of the 1980s at a rate approximating the 1952-77 average of 5.7 percent, but our calculations suggest that overall growth will have difficulty reaching 5 percent. We believe China's energy shortage will become more acute with oil production starting to decline by 1985. Moreover, the Chinese seem to be overestimating their ability to conserve energy in the future. As these constraints become increasingly evident to Chinese economic 25X1 planners over the next two to three years, it will reinforce the leadership's decision for Western companies to be deeply involved in energy develop- ment, particularly offshore oil.' US firms, which are world leaders in offshore drilling as well as surface mining, would be in a strong position to broaden their involvement in China. 25X1 ' This paper proceeds on the assumption that US companies will be significant participants in a commercially viable offshore oil program. ARCO has already begun exploration in the South China Sea, and US companies are participants in all consortiums still bidding on blocks. Secret EA 83-10107 June 1983 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84S00553R000200130003-1 Over the next decade China's economy also will become more dependent on foreign trade. The Chinese recognize that without substantial industrial and infrastructure imports, capital productivity will continue to stagnate, retarding overall development. We believe that China is counting heavily on the US market and that the US share of Chinese exports may well dou- ble over the next decade. On the import side, the Chinese will be particularly in need of transportation, electronics, mining technologies, and grain from the United States. These economic stakes will work to reinforce moderation in Beijing's political dealings with the United States. Beijing will be increasingly sensitive to the possibility that its growing commercial equities with the United States could be jeopardized by a major imbroglio over US links with Taiwan. Specifically, we believe China will be less likely to exert heavy pressure on the United States to reduce its arms sales to Taiwan as long as these transfers avoid clear violation of the "quantity and quality" provisions of the 17 August 1982 communique. Such moderation will be particularly evident during the latter half of the 1980s, when Chinese dependence on US oil technology will peak. Nevertheless, in our view, there will be definite limits to US economic influence. For many influential Chinese, Taiwan's divided status remains an emotional issue, symbolizing their country's continuing subservience to Western power. If the Chinese perceive an unambiguous trend toward strengthened US defense or political ties with Taipei, they may well force a general retrogression in Sino-US relations and sacrifice important elements of their economic and technological ties. In a worst case scenario, we believe the Chinese have sufficient commercial options through Western Europe, Japan, and the USSR to enable their economy to weather a major reduction in US oil-production assistance and trade. 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84S00553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Secret China's Increasing Interdependence China's Energy Bind-A Force for Interdependence 2 Foreign Trade: Pressures for Expansion 5 ... and Technologies/ Food Grains 6 Political Implications of Growing Economic Interdependence 6 A. China Exports: International Trade and Market Shares, 1981 11 B. China Imports: International Trade and Market Shares, 1981 13 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 3ecrei China-United States: Political Implications of Growing Economic Interdependence F-1 Over the past decade China's economic interdepend- ence with the world has reached unprecedented pro- portions. Foreign trade, primarily with the non-Com- munist world, has become more important to the country's economic growth than at any previous time in its history. In the early 1970s export earnings constituted only 3 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but within the decade this figure has more than doubled to nearly 7 percent. Western 2 technol- ogy and know-how have become key to China's development. Despite the economic retrenchment of the past three years, advanced technology imports by value now stand at more than 10 times their 1970 level. The number of officially sponsored Chinese scholars sent to study abroad have gone from a mere with any other country. Close to 100 Chinese delega- tions, mostly scientific and technological, visit the United States every month, while officially sponsored students currently studying in the United States number over 5,000.3 China's Commitment to Its Present Course China's economic opening to the West is driven by political as well as developmental considerations. The long-term threat from the Soviet Union remains a compelling reason for China to have the Western democracies participate in its economic development. Domestically, China's reform-minded leadership has built much of its political power base on a repudiation of the xenophobia fostered by Cultural Revolution radicals and on promises of a genuine economic takeoff by the 1990s. handful a decade ago to some 8,000. During the past four years, Beijing has turned to foreign investment-historically a symbol of exploita- tion-to increase its access to both technology and capital. So far over $1 billion has been invested in China by foreign firms. Perhaps most significantly, China is poised to conclude a number of long-term joint ventures with foreign energy companies that could result in undertakings valued in the tens of billions of dollars. The United States has played an important role in China's economic development-as a source of ad- vanced technology, agricultural products, and foreign exchange earnings. US-Chinese trade has risen from near zero in 1971 to $5 billion in 1982. Overall, the United States now ranks second as a source of imports and third as a market for China. A substantial amount of US-origin high technology has been ac- quired by the Chinese over the past several years, most prominently computers and aircraft. Beijing's scientific and technological exchange program with the United States is substantially larger than that We believe that China's economic interdependence with the West is likely to grow under Deng Xiaoping's political tutelage. Indeed, there are signs over the past year that the leadership consensus for the economic opening to the West is strengthening: ? China's recently released, long-term economic goals are predicated on a heavy infusion of foreign capital and technology. ? Media articles allegorically sniping at foreign in- volvement in China's modernization have dimin- ished markedly over the past year. ? In recent months Beijing has introduced a major liberalization of its economic regulations, facilitat- ing investment by foreigners and providing larger financial incentives. Although these trends are encouraging, a post-Deng leadership may not be as favorably disposed toward such substantial foreign involvement. 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Figure 1 China and Japan: Comparative Energy Savings 1 60 1970 75 83b 85 80 a"Economic activity" for Japan is GNP, and for China is industrial and agricultural output. b 1983-95 is projected. some influential Chinese remain deeply troubled by what they regard as China's excessive dependence on the West and the negative cultural byproducts that have accompanied commer- cial ties. Deng's chosen successors, Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang, will lack their mentor's broad power base and could find themselves having to make some concessions to these critics. A worst case scenario might envisage the Chinese leadership becoming in- creasingly xenophobic, yielding to an instinct that is a familiar part of the country's history. We believe, however, that the 1980s and 1990s will pose major economic challenges for China and sub- stantially lessen the likelihood of Beijing turning inward again. A continuing problem with energy supplies-despite new production in the South China Sea-and the country's increasing need for foreign trade to help underwrite economic growth should push Beijing toward greater economic interdependence with the West. 1974 2.5 4.1 1975 -5.4 1.2 1976 0.0 -0.8 1977 -5.2 -1.7 1978 -2.2 -2.0 1979 -1.1 -5.4 1980 -5.3 -9.1 1981 -5.5 -5.4 1982 -5.9 -1.2 China's Energy Bind- A Force for Interdependence China's most difficult economic problem during the next decade will be a continuing slowdown in the growth of domestic energy supplies. For several years insufficient energy output has been an important constraint on industrial production. Energy shortages will probably continue, particularly if heavy-industry growth rates continue to exceed plan targets Energy output is now growing at about 4 percent per year, almost all from coal. The outlook for other fuels is bleak-natural gas production has already fallen about 20 percent below its peak in 1979, and the critical oil sector is struggling to maintain production at its current level of 2 million b/d. We expect that China will face a decline in oil output by 1985. Recent studies by the World Bank conclude that China could become a net oil importer as early as 1985. 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84S00553R000200130003-1 Secret Over the past five years the Chinese have begun to appreciate more fully their energy squeeze and the difficulties of boosting domestic production. They have turned increasingly to the West for technology to spur development of energy supplies, while emphasiz- ing more stringent conservation practices at home. Since 1980 Beijing has allocated increased investment funds and designed new incentive programs to pro- mote energy savings. We believe the Chinese are aiming at a conservation rate that averages between 3.5 and 4 percent per year over the next decade. The World Bank projects that China's long-run rate of energy conservation is, however, unlikely to exceed 2 percent annually, while a recent forecast by Whar- ton Econometric Forecasting Associates concludes that annual gains in energy efficiency are likely to be in the 2.5- to 3-percent range for the rest of the century. Indeed, recent Chinese data indicate that the rate of energy savings is already slowing (see figure 1).' Early, relatively easy gains in efficiency wrung from China's outmoded industrial base must now be achieved through the costly acquisition of energy-efficient plants. Indeed, to sustain an average annual savings of 3 percent through the 1990s-about the rate achieved by the technologically advanced and more investment- oriented Japanese economy since 1973-would proba- bly require more sustained purchases of capital equip- ment than are now planned. Even allowing a generous 3-percent-energy-savings rate, however, the Chinese may be surprised by the constraint that energy places on economic activity during the next decade. Assuming that China is able to achieve the ambitious energy-production targets published in its media, our calculations suggest that the economy will be hard pressed to exceed a 4.4- percent average rate of agricultural and industrial increase through the mid-1990s (see figure 2, "Base- line Energy Scenario"). This rate is well short of Beijing's growth targets for the period and inconsider- ably below the average annual growth of 5.7 percent, which China achieved between 1952 and 1977.5F_ ' This is in part a result of the upswing in the energy-intensive heavy-industry sector. Q ' Subject to hard currency requirements, China could generate more growth by eliminating oil exports and importing more oil. In completing these calculations, we assumed that agriculture would grow at 4 percent per year-the target for the Sixth Five-Year Plan-through 1990. This estimate is about I percentage point above the historical growth path for agriculture. We also as- sume that light industry grows at 5 percent annually through 1995, again extending the Sixth Plan target. Energy demand in the residential-commercial sector is assumed to grow 4 percent annually, reflecting the increases in real disposable income available to the Chinese. Variations of I percentage point up or down in these assumptions did not materially modify our results. Changes outside of this range produced im- balances in sector performance that would ultimately constrain economic growth. We have also constructed high and low scenarios in the event that energy output varies from the plan over the decade. In the high scenario, should the Chinese surpass the energy-production targets by 15 percent, they could add about half a percentage point to their average rate of economic growth between 1983 and 1995, bringing it up to 5 percent. In the low scenario, a substantial shortfall of 25 percent in expected energy production-brought on, for example, by a slowdown in the acquisition of hydroelectric power plants, problems in developing new coal mines, and lower production from the offshore oil program- would cut the rate of economic growth by about 1 percentage point annually over the period. This would bring it down to about 3.5 percent. To match China's historical growth rate would require a combination of high energy growth and efficiencies that we consider unlikely. Enhanced Role for Western Firms As they come to recognize the full seriousness of the energy bind, the Chinese will be reinforced in their decision to have Western companies deeply involved in energy development. Beijing may rely more heavily on foreign equipment, technology, and investment to develop its coal sector, where production can be boosted within a relatively short time. An acceleration 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84S00553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Figure 2 China: Economic Performance Under Energy- Production Alternatives 600 1980 83a 85 I 1 J 90 of the coal program would require additional large amounts of investment, which could only come from foreign partners. Increasing petroleum production would be a longer term proposition, but the Chinese may try to speed up offshore development timetables and expand the number of blocks in which foreign firms are operating. It may also launch a more ambitious program for secondary and tertiary recov- ery at onshore fields. US firms, which are world leaders in the petroleum industry as well as in surface coal mining, stand to benefit most by China's urgent needs. Beijing has long been attracted to US oil firms, not only because of their strong position as a supplier of technology, but more importantly because of their unrivaled manage- rial and engineering experience with offshore oil projects. These assets will almost certainly win US oil majors a significant portion of the South China Sea blocks now in bidding. Although Beijing looks very favorably on US petro- leum companies, five or six major non-US companies will also play a long-term role in China's offshore High-energy scenario Baseline-energy scenario Low-energy scenario Annual growth rates, 1983-95 Percent High 5.0 Baseline 4.4 Low 3.4 programs as China seeks to diversify its dependency. British, French, and Japanese firms have already signed contracts, and Royal Dutch Shell also has sufficient technology and know-how to be highly competitive in offshore development work. Neverthe- less, their management and engineering experience is more limited than that of the US companies, and the non-US companies may well encounter some techni- cal difficulty operating in deepwater areas. Such shortcomings might be offset, however, by subcon- tracting specialized operations to US exploration com- panies or their foreign subsidiaries. In nonpetroleum energy projects, such as coal, gas, and nuclear and hydroelectric power, the Chinese will also retain a diversity of foreign partners. Although US firms have an advantage in surface-mining tech- nologies and possibly nuclear power, the Europeans and Japanese are at least equal in underground mining and hydroelectricity. The Soviets are also capable of assisting the Chinese in hydroelectric development. 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Secret Figure 3 China: Plans for Primary Energy 1982 Actual Percent 1995 Projected Percent - Onshore oil 12.2 - Offshore oil 5.1 Natural gas 0.2 Natural gas 3.2 Primary electricity 4.1 Coal 65.0 Note: This figure illustrates China's plans to shift its composition of energy supply (shown in metric tons of coal equivalent) over the next 12 years. Beijing is count- ing heavily on offshore petroleum production to help it through its energy bind, but our calculations suggest that supplies will constrain economic growth in any case. Foreign Trade: Pressures for Expansion Over the next decade China plans to place more emphasis on foreign trade in its efforts to increase the pace of overall growth. Authoritative Chinese officials predict that in this period trade will expand twice as fast as domestic production.' The Chinese recognize that expanded equipment imports from the West are key to their ability to compete with quality products in the international marketplace while conserving energy and raw materials. as much as 50 to 60 percent of the country's plant is highly inefficient by Western 6 Countries with large populations and geographic size tend to have lower foreign trade ratios (exports plus imports divided by GNP) than smaller countries. Thus, China, like the United States and USSR, will never be as dependent on foreign trade as South Korea, standards. The World Bank calculates that productiv- ity has stagnated since 1957. Its studies show that between 1957 and 1979 industrial output growth has been achieved almost entirely by increasing the quan- tities of labor and capital employed rather than by improving the quality of inputs or the efficiency with which they are being used. In this regard, China's performance is far worse than the 1952-57 period 25X1 when capital and labor productivity rose substantially. China's plans call for its large-scale import program 25X1 to be financed over the next decade primarily out of 25X1 export earnings. Statements by Chinese officials im- ply that they expect exports to rise as a share of GDP from 6 percent to approximately 9 percent. Without expanded earnings, China would be forced to go into Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 heavy debt-an option still anathema to China's leadership-or be prepared to accept a more modest import program that would retard overall economic growth. Increasing problems of providing employment within China, possibly of unprecedented proportions, will be an additional pressure on Beijing to expand export industries. According to Chinese demographers, the number of people reaching working age over the next decade will average more than 3 million annually in the urban areas and some 20 million per year in the countryside. It is doubtful that these new workers can be absorbed by China's virtually fixed agricultural base, and Beijing is investing more heavily in export- oriented industries to bring some relief. China Looks to the United States for Markets ... These pressures will impel China increasingly to cultivate the West, particularly the United States, as a source of export earnings. The United States now stands as China's third-largest export market, ac- counting for 10 percent of its total foreign exchange earnings, and China still considers the United States to have a large, relatively untapped appetite for Chinese goods. The complementarity of the US and Chinese economies suggests that China might be able to obtain as large a share of the US market as its present share of the world market, and maybe more.' China today accounts for 1.4 percent of world ex- ports-nearly double its 0.8-percent share of the US market (see appendix A). We would expect stronger Chinese sales to the United States of light industrial goods, consumer electronics, machine tools, finished wood products, and textiles. Despite this growth, China is not likely to become heavily dependent on any particular export market. Beijing will continue to trade substantially with Japan, Hong Kong, and Western Europe. Moreover, recent trends suggest that China's trade is becoming more diversified in the direction of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Declines in trade between China and the USSR and Eastern Europe over the past two decades leave much potential for Chinese sales of ' Beijing is well aware of the experience of a number of smaller Asian economies, which achieved their economic takeoff through exporting, largely to the United States. light industrial goods, including textiles and hard wares. Exports to the debt-ridden LDCs probably will grow the least over the next decade. ... and Technologies/Food Grains On the import side, by 1990 US sales can be expected to be running two to three times the present level of some $3 billion per year. This is a conservative estimate, based on the assumption that China only partially achieves its trade expansion goals and that the United States simply retains its current 20- percent share of the market. Given Chinese develop- ment priorities, American equipment and technologies in the transportation, mining, electronics, and energy sectors will be highly attractive. In addition, over the long term, China probably will have to increase grain imports as it grapples with the problem of trying to feed a growing population that now exceeds 1 billion people on 100 million hectares of arable land.' Higher incomes in China will add to the problem by raising the demand for meat, which requires large amounts of grain to produce. We believe, however, that the United States is unlikely to retain its current 60- percent share of the Chinese market as other grain- exporting countries expand production. The United States, however, will remain the largest single suppli- er, providing a larger share if Chinese harvests suffer severe shortfalls. Political Implications of Growing Economic Interdependence China's foreign policy has long been a complicated brew of realpolitik, xenophobic nationalism, and eco- nomic calculation. In the post-1949 era these forces have vied with one another, sometimes sharply, as China struggled to chart its course in the world. Security considerations have been the primary force shaping China's post-1949 foreign policy, but there have been periods when China's need for economic ties abroad has been an influential factor. 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 ~ecrvL Moscow's substantial economic assistance to China during the 1950s was clearly an important stimulus for Beijing's concessions to the USSR on a number of fundamental political issues. By any accounting, the 1950 Sino-Soviet Friendship Treaty was a bad politi- cal deal for the Chinese. After two months of hard bargaining, China: ? Recognized Outer Mongolia's continued "independ- ent status," which constituted tacit acceptance of Soviet control of territory that the Chinese believed was theirs. ? Agreed not to change the status of Dalian, which the Soviets were then occupying as a naval base. F- The Chinese occasionally hint that there is a direct link in the leadership's thinking between their own moderation on bilateral political issues and economic gain from the United States. In a recent conversation with senior US officials, Ambassador Zhang Wenjin strongly implied that China would not push Taiwan- related matters if the United States were more gener- ous in authorizing technology sales During the past year the Chinese have underscored 25X1 the value they attach to the US economic relations by taking pains to insulate them, for the most part, from the political differences that have beleaguered bilater- 25X1 al political relations. Senior Chinese officials, includ- ing Deng, have emphasized their intention not to allow these tensions to jeopardize overall trade and investment. In fact, the Chinese recently committed themselves to two large-scale, long-term joint ventures with US firms. Economic Leverage and the Taiwan Issue The importance to Beijing of continued access to US technological assistance and markets is likely to build over the next several years-reaching a high mark during the late 1980s. At that time China's energy shortage will have grown more acute, and US oil firms will be starting to move from exploration to the crucial developmental phase. The large amount of funds required for development will cause China to depend heavily on the international financial markets in which the United States plays a strong role. If Sino-US political relations were to veer off course before 1985, it would be easier for the Chinese to pull back from involvement without sustaining inordinate losses of time. After 1990, China may be better positioned to move ahead independently of US compa- nies as it gains experience with offshore development. The Soviets. subsequently delayed withdrawal from Manchuria and Lushun-both of which were to be vacated on dates established in the Treaty. Later, after having urged the Chinese into the Korean conflict, Moscow reneged on promises of compensa- tion for war expenditures. Nevertheless, as Chinese officials would later recall, China endured these affronts, in large part because they feared the loss of Soviet economic assistance. As the 1950s unfolded, Moscow's use of its economic ties to extract political and economic gains from China took its toll, ultimately helping precipitate a total break. This bitter experience convinced the Chinese that they must avoid becoming economically reliant on any one country again. Further, it explains Beijing's efforts to spread its trade and investment relations-as seen by its opening to the West in the 1970s-over a broad range of countries. Despite this concern, there is some evidence that, as development has become a higher priority for the Chinese leadership in recent years, economic consid- erations have played an increasingly influential role in China's foreign policy. Expectations of a major expan- sion of Sino-US economic ties seem to have been an important element in the Chinese decision to drop its precondition for a termination of US arms sales to Taiwan and to move ahead with the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1979. During the year prior to normalization, senior American officials painted a promising picture of liberalized trade and technology flows that would follow diplomatic recog- nition. The key question is how US economic leverage will influence Beijing's treatment of bilateral political irritants, especially the US-Taiwan relationship. Al- though China's assessment of the United States as a strategic counterweight to the Soviets will remain paramount in shaping Beijing's policy, we believe its Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 growing economic interdependence with the United States will help to moderate Beijing's reaction to what it sees as adverse developments in US-Taiwan ties. The Chinese appreciate the separation of private enterprise and government in the United States, but they almost certainly will worry that a major falling out may cause Washington to actively discourage US companies from making additional commitments for offshore operations or take steps to retard the transfer of petroleum-related technologies. Unsettled US-Chi- na relations could, in any case, cause US oil firms and bankers to be less willing to risk committing them- selves to long-term projects with Beijing. Moreover, the coming decade will be a period when China's foreign trade with the United States is of greater importance to China's economy than it is now, adding pressure on Beijing to try to ensure that its exports and imports are not constrained by a serious dispute over Taiwan. The Chinese also will want to avoid a highly charged Sino-US political atmosphere, fearing that this could in time adversely affect trade and investment, ties with Japan-a country that has traditionally followed the American lead. Japan would almost certainly be more wary of extending large concessionary loans if rela- tions between Washington and Beijing appeared to be heading for a sharp decline. Such a turn of events could also complicate Chinese efforts to acquire ad- vanced technology from Tokyo and cause private industry in the United States and Japan to become more wary about making long-term investments. We believe these new economic pressures on Beijing will help shape a more tolerant attitude toward US arms sales to Taiwan. Given the ambiguities of the 17 August 1982 communique, during the latter half of the 1980s China will have a greater incentive to take a flexible view of these sales as long as they do not clearly violate the "quantity and quality" provisions of the communique. In interpreting the "gray areas" of the agreement, the Chinese may be more receptive to US accounting of quantitative trends as well as our judgment as to what constitutes a qualitative improve- ment of arms. Moreover, in reacting to individual political initiatives that appear to favor Taipei, Bei- jing may be more predisposed toward pro forma responses and extremely cautious about boxing itself into hardline positions. The Limits of US Economic Influence Even in the late 1980s, however, US economic influ- ence in China will have definite limits. China's his- torical sensitivity to infringements of its sovereignty, reinforced by its negative encounter with the Soviet Union in the 1950s, has left a deep and lasting scar. Many influential Chinese, despite their ostensibly pro-Western outlook and their enthusiasm for stron- ger economic and technological ties with the United States, continue to harbor a deep resentment of China's humiliating partition by the West during the past century. For them, Taiwan's status symbolizes their country's continuing subservience to Western power and denies China its respect as a great nation. Hence, for much of the past three decades, one of Beijing's major foreign policy objectives has been the military and political isolation of the Government of Taiwan. During the 1950s this aim lay behind two major military crises in the Taiwan Straits and since 1970 has been a central issue in every major set of political negotiations between China and the United States. China's relations with Japan, Europe, and the Third World have also been dependent on their tacit agreement not to strengthen official ties with Taiwan. In Beijing's view, the progress that has been made toward reunification has been hard won, and it would regard an unambiguous trend toward stronger US- Taiwan defense or political ties as a fundamental threat to the gains for which it has worked so long. In this situation, we believe the Chinese would be pre- pared to force a general retrogression in Sino-US relations and to sacrifice some important elements of their economic and technological ties. Viable Commercial Alternatives to the United States Although Beijing's economic links with the United States will be highly valued, particularly during the latter half of this decade, China would have viable commercial options if a major rupture of its commer- cial relations with the United States were to occur. The Chinese could proceed with their offshore oil exploration and development program by utilizing non-US companies, principally European. Once devel- opment is under way, a switch away from US firms 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Secret would be a time-consuming and expensive undertak- ing that could result in China's having to cut back the scope of its offshore program. Beijing's greatest chal- lenge would be to locate non-US companies willing to invest large amounts of capital and to pick up where the US companies left off. Much would depend on prospects at the time for oil recovery in the US blocks. In a seriously deteriorating political situation, China could also weather a sharp reduction in trade with the United States. The Chinese appreciate that, short of a state of war, the US Government would be unlikely to impose anything resembling a cutoff in bilateral trade. More realistically, a US administration could withdraw trade preferences, such as most-favored- nation treatment, which is extended annually to Chi- na. It could also use its discretionary authority to curtail the importation of textiles and other high- volume Chinese exports. At most, we estimate such actions would cut China's foreign exchange earnings by 5 to 10 percent-enough to significantly constrain development plans but not cripple the economy. A portion of this loss could be offset by short-term borrowing, and the Soviet Union might take up some of the slack in China's exports as a political gesture. The imposition of US restrictions on technology and grain exports would no doubt put a crimp in China's development program, but would not be an insuper- able obstacle. In a number of industrial and military projects requiring advanced computer and electronic technology, the Chinese may well have to settle for less than state-of-the-art equipment. A cutoff of advanced technology from the United States would also inhibit China's efforts to learn how to replicate those embargoed items. On the other hand, over the next decade the Chinese will develop a much stronger capability to acquire advanced technology through illegal means, and strict enforcement of COCOM regulations is a problem that will probably become increasingly difficult. China's sources of grain will remain diversified, and, at worst, it could end up having to pay higher prices from other suppliers such as Canada, Australia, and Argentina Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553ROO0200130003-1 Secret Appendix A China Exports: International Trade and Market Shares, 1981 Total US Total US World Market US Market PRC Exports World Exports Total commodities 21.59 2.06 1,521.68 266.44 1.4 0.8 9.5 17.5 Industry 18.84 1.77 1,431.31 258.65 1.3 0.7 9.4 18.1 Metallurgical 0.89 0.10 111.05 22.57 0.8 0.5 11.7 20.3 Power 0.00 0.00 2.22 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Coal and Coke 0.27 0.00 16.84 0.14 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 Petroleum 4.57 0.32 371.78 84.12 1.2 0.4 7.0 22.6 Chemical 1.28 0.15 140.34 14.34 0.9 1.1 12.1 10.3 Machine building 1.49 0.09 493.76 82.10 0.3 0.1 6.4 16.6 Building materials 0.24 0.01 16.97 1.66 1.4 0.4 2.9 9.8 Forest 0.60 0.03 31.71 4.98 1.9 0.6 5.0 15.7 Food 2.40 0.08 89.26 15.41 2.7 0.5 3.5 17.3 Textile 2.76 0.19 37.31 2.74 7.4 6.8 6.7 7.4 Clothing 2.01 0.45 31.60 8.01 6.4 5.7 22.6 25.3 Leather 0.52 0.06 17.22 4.79 3.0 1.3 11.8 27.8 Papermaking 0.86 0.12 71.24 15.36 1.2 0.8 14.0 21.6 Other 0.97 0.15 19.15 2.33 5.0 6.4 15.4 12.2 Agriculture 2.75 0.29 90.37 7.79 3.0 3.7 10.5 8.6 Livestock 0.37 0.00 4.35 0.34 8.5 0.0 0.0 7.8 Fishing 0.39 0.02 10.74 2.73 3.7 0.8 5.6 25.4 Food crops 0.46 0.00 45.53 1.88 1.0 0.2 0.9 4.1 Industrial crops 1.06 0.21 23.83 2.06 4.4 10.4 20.1 8.6 Crude byproducts 0.47 0.05 5.93 0.79 7.9 6.2 10.5 13.3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553ROO0200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553ROO0200130003-1 Secret Appendix B China Imports: International Trade and Market Shares, 1981 Total US Total US World Market US Market PRC Imports World Imports Total commodities 17.84 3.59 1,521.68 220.90 1.2 1.6 20.1 14.5 Industry 13.61 1.66 1,431.31 188.04 1.0 0.9 12.2 13.1 Metallurgical 1.61 0.02 111.05 8.36 1.5 0.2 1.1 7.5 Power 0.02 0.00 2.22 0.00 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Coal and coke 0.10 0.00 16.84 6.01 0.6 0.0 2.9 35.7 Petroleum 0.05 0.00 371.78 4.24 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Chemical 2.21 0.42 140.34 27.91 1.6 1.5 18.9 19.9 Machine building 5.43 0.29 493.76 108.18 1.1 0.3 5.3 21.9 Building materials 0.16 0.00 16.97 2.00 0.9 0.0 0.0 11.8 Forest 0.19 0.10 31.71 3.77 0.6 2.7 53.8 11.9 Food 0.75 0.02 89.26 8.35 0.8 0.3 0.0 9.4 Textiles 2.30 0.61 37.31 4.18 6.2 14.6 26.6 11.2 Clothing 0.04 0.00 31.60 1.13 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.6 Leather 0.13 0.06 17.22 0.73 0.8 8.7 47.8 4.3 Papermaking 0.51 0.13 71.24 9.50 0.7 1.4 26.5 13.3 Other 0.10 0.00 19.15 3.67 0.5 0.0 1.0 19.2 Agriculture 4.23 1.93 90.37 32.86 4.7 5.9 45.5 36.4 Livestock 0.00 0.00 4.35 0.27 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 Fishing 0.00 0.00 10.74 1.02 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 9.5 Food crops 2.39 1.33 45.53 20.36 5.2 6.5 55.8 44.7 Industrial crops 1.73 0.59 23.83 10.70 7.3 5.5 34.4 44.9 Crude byproducts 0.11 0.00 5.93 0.50 1.9 0.0 0.0 8.5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553ROO0200130003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1 Secret Secret Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/30: CIA-RDP84SO0553R000200130003-1