WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING IN EL SALVADOR?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84B00148R000200450028-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 23, 2007
Sequence Number: 
28
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 24, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84B00148R000200450028-6.pdf456.1 KB
Body: 
jproved~For Release 2007 J05 C I -RDP64B0014-8R000200450028-6 'fix ~a ,~~ SPEED LETTER 31 March 1982 IETTEI . 2-0789 g any comment to make on a letter sent to the Committee Chairman Melvin Price (D.,CAJL) by Congressman Henry Gonzalez (De, TX). (See attached exerpt from the Congressional Record, 24 March, which gives the full text of the letter.) If your. answer is to refer him to DoD, can we be specific about were in DoD7 I received a telephone call from Bill Hogan, Counsel HASC askin whe'-her- CTA h -' ALL PORTIONS OF THIS 14EMORANDUM ARE CONFIDENTIAL Attachment REPLY A prnvPrl For Release 9 *9T3aRGV,A(R~7F'84 - A'TIJ2E14 Fins I Legislative Liaison 4, l F r ,,'-or hot, that there is some- over the Olympic coin pro- ram proposed In H.R. 3958 and S. 231 All they would like is a realistic program that every American could afford. Perhaps we could all learn from the good commonsense and re- straint they have shown through these letters. Frequently. the simplest most straight forward plans yield the best results. Let us keep this in mind when we consider the proposals to commemorate the Olympics and raise money for our athletes.? WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING IN EL SALVADOR? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under- a previous order of the House, the gen- tleman from Texas (Mr. GoNw..zz) is recognized for 15 minutes. .71 o Mi. GONZALEZ. Mr. Speaker, .we are told that our troops in El Salvador are only serving as advisers, as train- ing specialists. Yet, I have not - one time seen any news report that quotes . an American soldier talking about his. job. The one-and only picture we have seen of American soldiers at work in El Salvador was provocative enough to cause the American Ambassador to send the commanding officer of Army personnel packing. With that one brief moment of light, the curtain descend- ed. What are our troops really doing in El Salvador, and why are not they al- lowed to talk to the press-or if they are allowed to talk, why are not their words reported? Salvadoran troops are- interviewed; they are photographed; their stories are reported. Peasants are interviewed, their desperation report- ed, their misery portrayed-but you ?ver hear a word reported from our own Errebassy personnel. Why not? This past weekend, two graduate tridents in San Antonio approached me with startling words about what ? ur troops may really be doing in El ::.lvador. These students were earnest, their convictions sincere, and their concern obvious. What they told me sty;:;gcsto that our troops In El Salvador. are more than advisers, and they are engaged in more than the role of in- strnci,ors. These students told me that they s ;.d run Into a soldier who was in tran- sit.. This soldier stated that he was In the Special Forces, and that the 10th Spccia'. Forces Group is assigned to El. S&~lvador. According to him, this unit consists of 220 men. He said that meta-. l ers of the unit had participated in military missions and had been en- gaged in combat. This is in complete contrast to the officially stated U.S. policy. That policy supposedly prohibits American soldiers even to carry rifles, let alone he engaged in any kind of combat op- oation--even as advisers. Those who recall the incident of the unit that was photographed carrying 2007/05123 CIA-RDP84B00148R'00Q200450028-6 IONAL RECORD ,-- HOUSE M March 24, ,19 rim will also remember that the Am- bassador made a great show out of throwing the unit commander out of El Salvador. A few days later. there were newspaper stories that said the administration was reconsidering Its order against permitting soldiers to carry anything other than sidearms. Then there was nothing. No word about revised orders, no word about the ejected colonel, nothing. I said at the time that the order against carry- ing arms was unreasonable, and.that it was also rediculous that our troops in El Salvador-are.not getting hazardous duty pay-although our diplomats are. The question then and now is, what are our soldiers doing? If we do have soldiers engaged in combat -patrols, or in any form of combat-even as advisers-then . our role In El Salvador is very different from what the official line says IV is. There is a world of difference between a Green Beret who Is training soldiers In the Salvadorean equivalent of Fort Benning, and one who is out on a combat mission. There Is a world of difference between the level of com- mitment that is Implied. There is a world of difference between a soldier committed to train others, and one who is in any kind of combat situation. ,Among other things, there is the fact that the War Powers Act Is involved in any such difference. At the time of the famous picture in- cident, we were told that our soldiers should not have been armed. If they should not have been armed, one won- ders, where did the -arms come from? The answer to that is probably that these were, in fact, the weapons of the soldiers in question, and they were being carried pursuant to an order of some kind. Now it happens that those. troops were not ? in combat, or any- thing approaching combat-but clear- ly they felt that they might become engaged, that they might at the very least have to defend themselves. The incident raised many questions," none of them ever answered. - With reporters swarming all over El Salvador, it is remarkable-astonish- ing. In fact. that the one brief glimpse is all the film that we have seen of American personnel. We never see them interviewed, never see stories that explain what their jobs are, how many there are, or where they work. We never see Interviews with civilian personnel, either, or stories about their work or what they do. Could all this silence be telling us something? Could it be telling us that there is no information from the field, because that information would contradict what our public policy is? I have to wonder, especially in light of what I was told by those two students this past weekend. The one fact that I can confirm is that there are, indeed. Green Berets in El Salvador. The Pentagon admits that there are, but denies that any particular unit is assigned there. The Wee Is so overwhelming-the distinguished chairman-of the Foreign Operations ? Appropriations Subcom-=? mittee to consider this matter. These, I offer for the. Rscoan a copy of my. Washington, D.C., March 22, 1982: Hon. MELvni Paics, Chairman, Committee on Armed Services,... . Rayburn House Office Building, Wash- ington, D.C. DEng MEL: I have received uncorroborated information of an intensely disturbing nature. and am writing to ask that you pro- vide whatever verification you can. I am making this request because I do not believe the Administration would be likely to pro- vide a complete and Informative response to an Individual Member, but would do so on the basis of an inquiry from your Commit, tee. My understanding has been that the U.S. military personnel in El Salvador and. other Central American countries are simply training specialists serving on a temporary duty (TDY) basis. However. information I received last weekend suggests that this is not the case: that U.S. Special Forces units are In El Salvador and perhaps elsewhere as well. According to my informant, the 10th Special Forces Group Is in El Salvador; that this organization consists of 220 soldiers; and that members of the organization have been engaged in combat missions in one degree or another. .. .. I know, of course, that Special Forces per- sonnel are especially trained in counterin- surgency operations, and as.such are not only highly qualified combat soldiers, but experts in training techniques as well. How- ever, there Is a vast difference betwen the mission of soldiers who simply provide train- Ing, and soldiers who participate-even in an advisory capacity-in combat missions. I would be greatly Indebted to you if you could Inquire whether there are. in fact, Special Forces personnel in El Salvador, or for that matter Honduras or Costa Rica. If there are such personnel, are they there as individuals, or as Special Forces units? Have any U.S. personnel been involved In any- thing other than training? I am enormously concerned that the role of the United States forces in Central Amer- ica may be different In nature and scope than what has been reported. I know that your Committee woud have great reason to be concerned if the nature of our role is more than simply one of providing neces- sary military training. Since such questions are of concern to your Committee, and since long experience has taught me that Admin- istrations are not entirely forthcoming about inquiring on such sensitive issues as this. I would be more grateful for your in quiries on this, and for any Information you can provide to me. With best wishes. Sincerely, Approved For Release 2007105/23_: CIA-RDP84B00148R000200450028-6 ? Approved.For Rel e 2007705123 C1A-RDP84B }0.1.48RVM200450028-6 -,T4. 1982 CON IONAL RECORD --.HOUSE ? H1109: ,-Speak I would not raise these ari: activaanterest. in- the. establishment of ld lik wou e to see the program elimi - dons but for the fact that this the Avery Brundage Oriental Art Collection nated altogether The enter rise z n . p o e ,use has before been told that at the DeYoung Museum. He extended his proposal is apparently designed to interest to the entire Fine Arts Museums of American policy is one thing,. only to y San Francisco. where he served with distinc- take up the slack that results from / learn later. that it was. another. We tion on the board. He was also a member of UDAG fund reductions or elimination. I have been led down the path before- the Museum Society. and became its presi. I do not believe that reducing the beyond point 11 d u ' me no want th o happen again. Everyember of the Board of Di rectors of th ilymean moivate Inve stment and re pr _~ poll I have seen suggests clearly that Oakland Museum. and a trustee of the i 1 - supporf'even our present involvement an ardent supporter of musical activities In terprise zone concept Herbert Lieben- the Bay Area. and recently was appointed to son. president of the National Small in El Salvador, let alone the kind of in. the Board of Governors of the San Francis. Business Association, has described volvement I was told about. If the War co Symphony. the situation in many urban areas. Powers Act is indeed being violated, William Picher was actively involved In- "Most small firms are hanging on. by that would be a? grave matter-grave choosing and contributing fine art objects their fingernails just trying to sur- on its face, graver still because the sin to grace. the Symphonys new home, the vive," he says. He notes that "Money's would be compounded by deception. Loise M. Davies Symphony Hall. His taste what's needed, not tax deductions." We need some answers. We ought-to. and collections in contemporary art were UDAG provides that money, and the be asking questions., We ought to look well known and he was a firm believer in at the answers with skeptical eyes-for furnishing support to local artists. . . . private investment that results pro-- But his greatest contribution lay in his vides the jobs. At my request, the Con.- the past. K we from awareness of the environment and the field gressional Research Service (CRS) has them: t. If e want to. avoid our so od rtawope ing in of natural conservation. He understood the projected what we might expect if the li threat. of uncontrolled development long UDAG program Is funded at $500 mil. El Salvador?* before conservation became a household lion per year-the amount authorized . ; ' .:~:...N .: word.-8e was Interested in birds from an The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under early age. and became president of a local by Congress In fiscal 1982-through. a previous order of the House, the gBay Area Audubon chapter when It com- fiscal years 1982-I14. CRS projects that tleman? use r der o California the gen- e prised a very small group of persons. From we could expect to create or retain is recognized for 5 minutes. this position. he was able to found and raise more than 200,000 private sector jobs,. ' ? support for the West Marin sanctuary $11 billion in new private Investment, [Mr. COELBO addressed the House. known as Audubon Canyon Ranch. _ and $98 million in new local property His remarks will appear hereafter in For the following twenty years; and until tax revenues. This extrapolation is the Extensions qt Remarks.} the day of his death, his untiring work on based on data compiled in a recent behalf of fund raisiDL land acquisition and HTJI? evaluation of the UDAG ... . `` management, and organizational activities pT0- WIrd TAM STANTON PICHER " r never ceased. In fact, his work almost single- gam- handedly started the conservation move. While the administration's lack. of The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under ment in West Mario that has resulted in the enthusiasm for the UDAG program Is a previous order of the House, the gen- . establishment of two great parks. His stead-' clear. I would hope that the decision. tleman from ,California (Mr. PHILLIP - fast efforts led to the preservation of much makers consider -exactly how much RrigEoN) is recognized for 5. minut d land along Tn,nales Ray and M i h _ _ _ _ _ _ _ B e u r eac dubon Canyon Ranch. which features rata- vestment, ana guts million in new local y sorel mis . San Franciscans win s t axe o n P the s can mean In a depressed. econo ral preservation and educational programs the late William Stanton icher. at Its threepreserves, will remain his great- my. When he died recently of a brain est monument. We should preserve and improve tumor at age 67, the bay area lost a Many people of the Bay Area, dedicated Federal programs such as UDAG,.pro special friend of conservation and the to the preservation of the quality of life on grams which do the job they were de. arts. But we can be comforted by the our planet, will miss him.* I _ signed to do. An experiment with en- knowrledae that he left aspecial terprise zones, if it is accompanied by legacy, 7 legacy of community service UDAG: URBAN ENTERPRISE further reductions in the UDAG pro- witi-. particular relevance today.. He ? WITH A TRACK'RECORD , gram, would be a mistake. The UDAG did more than achieve notable prog-. program is a winner. We should keep ress through. a number of individual The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under it. projects. At a time when some would a previous order of the House, the sylv ania (Mr. Wenvironmental protection and tleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. WIZ- I would be happy to share with my r rtisfiic endeavors to the status of dis- LiAM J. CosraE) is recognized for 5 min- colleagues the complete text of the pensable l xuries,. we should appreci-. utes. .. CRS report on the projected perform- at- tile .vcrk of someone who demon- o Mr. WILLIAM J. - COYNE. Mr. _ante of the UDAG program over the atrated that they are Instead Integral Speaker, this week the administration next 3 years. Please contact my office parts of a democracy. William Stanton announced its legislative plans for the if you desire a copy of the report.e Picher has permanently enhanced the much discussed but little tested urban natural and cultural environment of enterprise zones. - AMERICA RESPONDS TO THE--, countless people In our area. In its eagerness to create still more "DO-IT-YOURSELF" BUDGET NIL.-. .. ieaker,-I would like to' insert tax breaks, In this instance for firms int,3 the RECORD the following tribute which locate in distressed areas, I The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under to Mr. richer., beautifully composed by would hope the administration does a previous order of the House, the gen- Clifford Conly: not compound the damage it has tleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Reuss) is his close friend , r. Missouri native- William Stanton T~icher caused . HUD's urban development recognized for 30 minutes. t AG S - M action g an s ~.,a ..%~ Wkl .a.s a ), is job creating v uescenuant of President Lincom"s . Mr. Speaker, the worn ? -ea.*. Secretary of 9var; a student of poetry. Program with a proven track record. we hear, on both sides of the aisle- is ; i in World War 1I in the U.S. Army Intel li? 1977, have been reduced, by a third in The President has told Congress to % 1' t: ^ .c:eCorns After the war his life revolved ' ^ . , the - administration s most recent "put up or shut up." roue:,. his bookstore and art gallery. until budget request. The Carter fiscal 1981 We shall "put up." he cicsed it in the early 1950s. budget provided he moved to the San Fran- $675 million; the Last week At that time as chairman of th Joi t , , e n t-,-,co Pay Area and dedicated his life to Reagan fiscal 1983 budget asks $440 Economic Committee, I testified public service. His Interests were far rang. million. It is no secret that some at the before the House and Senate Budget frig. An early study and unique collection'of Office of Management and Budget, In. Committees and presented an alterna ancient Chinese porcelain led him to take eluding. Director David Stockman. tive "Do-It-Yourself" congressional Approved For Release 2007%05123: CIA-RDP84B00148R000200450028-6 '