REQUEST FOR BRIEFING ON EL SALVADOR BY UNDER SECRETARY BUCKLEY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP84B00049R000902390002-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 19, 2016
• Document Release Date: April 4, 2006
• Sequence Number: 2
• Publication Date: March 11, 1982
• Content Type: MEMO

CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2006/05/25 : CIA-RDP84B00049R000902390002-2
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET 8~ _ 0 70A
SUBJECT: (Optional)
Request for Briefing on El Salvador for Under Secretary Buckley
FROM:
SA/DCI/IA
EXTENSION
NO.
DATE 11 March 1982
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
1.
Deputy Director of
Central intelligence
2.
3. Director of Central
Intelligence
4.
SA/DCI/IA
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
FORM 61 O USE PREVIOUS
I-79 EDITIONS
Approved For Release 2006/05/25: CIA-RDP84B00049R000902390002-2
 11 March 1982
Approved For Release 2006/03725 I -CIATRDP84B00049ROOO902390002-2
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
VIA . Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
FROM : SA/DCI/IA
SUBJECT . Request for Briefing on El Salvador by Under Secretary
Buckley
1. In a note to you yesterday, I mentioned that Under Secretary James
Buckley had made an inquiry regarding the possibility of receiving the
El Salvador briefing. We all agreed that it would be ideal if he could
attend the briefing of the "wise men" yesterday. He did not.
2. I received a call again today requesting a separate briefing for
Buckley, who has blocked out on his calendar from 2:30 to 3:30 on 31 March.
(You may already know this, but I was told by my contact in INR that there
is a good chance that Buckley will become the new Counsellor at State.) I
was asked also whether it would be alright for appropriately cleared INR
analysts to attend the briefing. I see no reason why they should be excluded,
but I suggested that Hugh Montgomery be consulted.
3. I believe we should proceed with this briefing. I do not believe
it is necessary for either of you to be present, and Buckley apparently does
not expect that either. Therefore, if you concur I will aski to 25X1
brief Buckley per his request. Please let me know if you wish to handle this
a different way.
tral Intelligence Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
ntelligence Director of Central Intelligence
Approved For Release 2006/05E EIAWRDP84B00049R