RECOMMENDATION NO. 5D

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00780R004000100014-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 7, 2003
Sequence Number: 
14
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
STUDY
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00780R004000100014-4.pdf299.59 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-00780R004000100014-4 Recommendation No. 5d Make a study to determine the feasibility of conducting all recruiting on a TDY basis from Headquarters. 1. Such a study must begin with some indication of the dimensions of the recruiting job, and some assumptions. First, we assume that the Agency will remain relatively stable in size and composition for the next few years; and that staffing experience in FY's 1970 and 1971 indicates generally what will be required of recruiters in the foreseeable future. We assume further that it will be both necessary and desirable to continue a nation-wide recruitment program. 25X1 Ims volume o input, matched against losses which were greater brought , the Agency within easy range of its FY 1972 ceiling. Components henceforth will be able to work toward a balance in their staffing gains and losses. We estimate conserva ' requirements for the next few years will 25X1 be on the order of per year, of which at least 85% will have to be supplied by 'the recruiters. 3. In FY 1970 field recruiters submitted 4, 928 applicant cases. Of these 1, 659 (34%) came from the six regions west of the Mississippi. An- other 1, 649 (33. 5%) came from the Central, Northeastern and Southern regions east of the Mississippi, and 'the remainder (1, 620; 32. 5%) were produced by Headquarters-based recruiters working in the region which includes D.C., Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio and Western Pennsylvania. In FY 1971 the recruiters' case production was 3, 547, of which 1, 388 (39%) came from west of 'the Mississippi; 1, 174 (33%) from the Central, Northeastern and Southern regions east of the Mississippi; and 985 (28%) from the region worked out of Headquarters. The attached map (Attachment 1) illustrates these major points about the recruitment program: a. It covers the entire country. Listed are the numbers of applicants, by State of permanent residence, regardless of where they were at the time of recruitment. This reflects the distribution and broadly representative character of our input. Approved For ReleasIZ LC9 : CxWlK>kdrh'At08 80R004000100014-4 downgrading and , docla,Sltlcatfon Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-0078OR004000100014-4 b. It is a continuous activity throughout the year. There are seasonal variations in the numbers of cases produced per month, but there are no periods of inactivity. Data concerning the range and average numbers of cases produced each month are posted only for the regions in the Western two-thirds of the country; it is with respect to this extensive geography that the economics of recruitment methods are most important. 4. Not reflected in the foregoing statistics are the many local-level actions taken by field recruiters on special interest or "flap-potential" cases, either to protect or enhance the Agency "image:" coordination nave no record o the eventual action taken, but these informal refer- rals average close to 200 per year. These services arise from the recruiters' presence in the field, their detailed and current familiarity with their territories, and their knowledge of the gamut of Agency requirements. 5. The foregoing paragraphs serve mainly to outline the scope and extent of the recruitment activity, the results achieved, and some of the related or incidental purposes served by maintaining regional represen- tation. We look now at some of the cost/efficiency factors involved in considering the feasibility of a TDY operation. Let us assume a recruitment force of the size currently authorized for FY 1972. a. Salaries. No difference. b. Space. There is no cost to the Agency for space occupied by regional recruiters. If all operated out of Headquarters, space would be required for 12 more Professional Recruiters, plus 2 staff and 2 contract Clerical Recruiters. c. Telephone Service. Up to 10 additional extensions would be required at Headquarters to handle a high volume of long-distance calls. d. Secretarial Services. Professional Recruiters in the field have part-time contract secretarial help. At Headquarters one full-time secretary would be required for two recruiters to handle the clerical work load. Approved For Releae's2eR 9: CIA-RDP84-0078OR004000100014-4 Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-00780R004000100014-4 e. Safes. Safes presently in field offices would have to be moved or otherwise disposed of. Up to 10 additional safes would be needed at Headquarters. f. Office Equipment, Supplies, Postage, etc. Essentially the same. 6. It is in the area of Travel that relative cost /efficiency factors are most apparent. Recruiters would be assigned areas of geographic respon- sibility in any case because of the importance of continuity in developing and dealing with sources. TDY travel, especially west of the Mississippi, would be neither economical nor efficient for one-or-two-day visits to a given region. Trips of 7 or 8 days would be desirable to permit adequate coverage and source development. Efficient use of time during prolonged trips would involve costs in addition to public transportation such as car rental, use of hotel accommodations for interviewing, week-end per diem, etc. , to say nothing of wear and tear on the recruiter. The regionally based recruiter, on the other hand, can cover his territory through shorter trips and achieve continuing coverage at less cost and less strain on self and family life. As an example for purposes of cost comparison, let us look at the region embracing Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska and Arkansas--the geographic center of the United States--which is covered at present by a recruiter based in Attached (Attachment 2) are two travel vouchers marked #1 and #2. #1 is an actual voucher sub- mitted by the resident recruiter at for the month of December 1970. During the first 18 days of that month he made two trips out of town, of approximately 3 days duration each, to engage in college recruiting, military source development, clerical recruiting, and to interview candi- dates who had written either to Headquarters or to himself and who looked promising. His itinerary included points in Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa, at a total travel cost of $257. 70. The rest of the time he was in II preparing applicant cases, interviewing applicants, corresponding with applicants and with Headquarters, and developing sources and leads in the area. His total vouchered expenses for the month were $299. 59. Voucher #2 represents a simulated 8-day period during which a TDY recruiter would travel out of Headquarters and cover the same itinerary, for the same purposes, as #1. His travel costs would be $493.28. Upon his return to Headquarters from this trip, he would have to follow up by telephone and correspondence on contacts made, await responses from applicants seen, and start making arrangements for another visit to the region. 14/29 : CIA-RDP84-00780R004000100014-4 Approved For ReleS' PET Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-00780R004000100014-4 7. Other factors to be considered include: a. The impact of frequent TDY, including weekends, on Recruiter force stability. Many men left recruitment in the 50is when much of it was done on a TDY basis, because of the strain and the disruption of family life. b. Recruiters, like other Agency employees, are under mandate to avoid the possibility of hijacking. A few presently can and do fly, but if flying mainline planes they may not carry documents, forms or even brochures that associate them with the Agency. All recruiters could fly out of Headquarters under the same restrictions, but an additional administrative burden would be created by the necessity to cache recruiting materials all over the country, and the risk of hijacking would increase. c. A Headquarters-based operation would impair our ability to respond quickly to Special Interest cases and to the special requirements that are levied on field recruiters by operating components. 8. The foregoing facts and factors suggest that there would be no advantages in either efficiency or economy in conducting all recruitment on a TDY basis from Headquarters and that a change to such a method of operation therefore would not be feasible. Approved For ReQE/T4/29 : CIA-RDP84-00780R004000100014-4 Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-0078OR004000100014-4 Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-0078OR004000100014-4 TRAVEL VOUCHER :UBMIT AN ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 4L DUTY STATION OR OFFICE, ROOM NO. CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL I certify that this voucher and any attachments are correct the ex- , penses were incurred on official business, and that payment or _ credit has not been received. NCE DUE FROM TRAVELER tach copy of refund receipt) THIS SPACE FOR OFFICE OF FINANCE -USE ONLY . :,DVANCES, FUNDS AND ~PORTATION FURNISHED DESCRIPTION ADVANCE ACCOUNTS 13-27 +--i PREPARED BY 28-33 _ T/'A NO. . SHIP. DOC NO. ---- - ;32-33 DIV. SECRET When Filled Lrt) pprove Ol?E DATE-VOUCHER NO. 2-12 (For finance use only) PAYMENT AND/OR BANKING INSTRUCTIONS JiREAS-CHECK BANK CASHIER CHECK APPROVAL El REQUIRED NOT ^ REQUIRED DATE- APPROVED SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL CERTIFIED FOR PAYMENT OR CREDIT SIGNATURE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER DESIGNATION OF AGENT TO PICK LIP CASH (both signatures required when applicable) I authorize my agent, whose signature appears below, to receive cur- rency amounting to of official funds on my behalf and acknowledge receipt of such funds and my re- sponsibility therefor, when paid to my agent. SPACE BE LOW FOR EXCLUSIVE USE OF OFFICE OF FINANCE 40- 42-47 48- 50 STATION 41- 49 55-66 67-70 - CODE-3 E X .- C OBLIG. REF. NO. . OBL. L C GENERAL COST-FAN ACCOUNT SYMBOL OBJECT CLASS REC. RPT NO. P 0 ADVANCE REF. 10 'LEDGER F 61-66 68-70 ----------- PROJECT NO. E N D E. ACCT: NO. EMP NO SUB. NO.... O D E ACCT. NO. F 1 r u N o CK. NO. I OC 0 DUE . . 5 X REF. NO. DATE TOTALS Approved For Release 003/04/29: CIA-RDP84-00780R00400 10001 -4 AGENT PAYEE 71-80 AMOUNT 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-0078OR004000100014-4 Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-0078OR004000100014-4