(Sanitized)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP84-00709R000400070294-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 4, 2001
• Sequence Number: 294
• Publication Date: July 16, 1947
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP84-00709R000400070294-7
OGC Has Reviewed
l6 JTuly 1947
r=ow-mw, Po R CYZ -'F, P''Tt.3C?ti21 DI VI at ON, 030
?
25X1A Subject:
and
1. fief orenoo is ma(Ic to your memorandum dated 9 July
1947 ooncerninr- the above subjects. The riemoran_da from
Chief, I BT, dated 0 July 1947, are returned hereithe You
regiieAt inforr tion whether per diem payments to the aubjeats
pending; depar=tu;,e to their overseas atation> would be approp"
riate under exi rting regulations.
2. It appears that both subjects were 6oheduled to do-
part for their overseas posts on 7 July 1947, aid, due to
circumstances beyond control of the individuals,, it has been
neceiaarbr to assign the to eluties here in Washington on a
temporar basis. The Chiefs FBT requests that Miss
be placed on per diem effective 6 July 1947 and that
t'3.z3n be placed on per di-3r., oftotive 1 July
.3.!D-',-7# both per di ens to he tominated upon del
g M)" i. n.z t on. departure f, t~ .st
3. Although it does not appear from the attached trek
ra~~dc Ar your nonoz andu~"''f, we haws been informed that both
a h j ecta were employed by CIO on 30 Deaembdr 1940 by vouchered
fui 1s on a. depart ncntal appointr:e it. Subaequentlys both i.n..
divicduc,lc rosignod on 3 May 1947, apparently to accept an
tznvcluch;ered position in CIO. Thes,'eforo, from 30 Deee,iber
194( until 3 1!ay 1947, the porns.nesnt official duty station
of both individuals was %'Ia.shingt.on, D. C. In view of this
fact, VJ ehinr-ton, I). C. may not be designtatad as the to nor.
try duty station, for the pturpose. of paying them per di esm
wwher. e, as in t}is case, there has been no physical departure
fron 1 ' ,a'iin,--ton.
4. Payment of per dio to the subjects under these oir-
cu titrincos is not authorized udder existing ragKlation.s.,
hl ~_ _ ,< may be true that both individuals have been sub3eztod
to additional financial burdens due to the oh age of ci.rouaa-
stancoss : neceiel funds may not be used where the pay ants
are not appropriate under the regulations,
25X1A
.-.......r wr. raw.rwr~b
S a n ant General Couns 61
25