TRENDS IN ARMEMENT PROGRAMS OF LESSER POWERS IN THE 1980S AND IMPLICATIONS FOR US INTERESTS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83T00966R000100040036-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 3, 2007
Sequence Number: 
36
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 9, 1982
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83T00966R000100040036-8.pdf96.86 KB
Body: 
ip1 Ad ffNl1I V131C .07/04104 : CIA-RDP Notional Intelligence Council 9 June 1982 NOTE FOR: Deputy Director for Intelligence Here's a way to deal with the Direc- tor's proposal in his 7 June memo, "After- math of the Falklands-" I propose to assign it to I Iwho will need support from DIA and other parts of the. DoD as well as from your people. However, I believe that a formal Community product is not appropriate. At tachments cc: NIO/GPF Henry S. Rowen C/NIC 0966R 00100040036-8 Approved For Release 2007/04/04: CIA-RDP83T00966R000100040036-8 Approved For Release 2007/04/04: CIA-RDP83T00966R000100040036-8 Approved For R ease 2007/04/04: CIA-RDP83T00966R00100040036-8 7 June 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR: DOI Chief, C/NIC FROM: Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT: Aftermath of the Falklands 1. In the aftermath of the Falklands, a number of lesser powers will be reevaluating their security position in terms'of their fore- structure, particularly in terms of the value of smart weapons, their access to these and other weapons, and economic opportunities afforded by this development. 2. I.have already suggested looking ahead to evaluating the present prospective position of Brazil, Israel, Korea, Japan, Argentina and other countries with the economic strength and technological capability to ?~ enhance their role as arms suppliers. It is perhaps more important to look at the other side of this equation to find the types of weapons and missions to which these lesser powers may turn to deter larger powers. For that matter, the demonstration of the value of a potency of smart bombs may place a new premium on close-in launching sites and arrangements for using them in the defense.and deterrence planning of larger powers. These factors are relevant obviously in the terms of ships vs. aircrafts, the tendency of-air to air missiles to make air combat suicidal to both parties, and to guided missiles to tank equation. 3. Will you give this some thought and evaluate our capability to deal with what I see is an important intelligence problem coming over the horizon and let's discuss what we should be doing about it. William J. Casey Anoroved For Release 2007/04/0~E IAZRDP83T00966R000100D49036-8