KAPUSTIN YAR CRUISE TEST COMPLEX D, SITE 1

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
29
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 1, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 1, 1982
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6.pdf2.33 MB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 bask uMagery uwtwpvetato?u Pt pcn Ua.quott T Vau C TU'usc , uegg CC.?r~Oc~~ Do ~oc~ Q~~ MOSSOLE RANNGE : SURAUECGOCC SSM SPACE FACOUTOES USSR I Z-146, 33/82 PICA-15/0606/82 DECEMBER 1982' copy 2`2 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01 CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Kapustin Yar Crui se Test Complex D, Site 1 CATEGORY BE NO. COMIREX NO. USATC. Series 200, Sheet 0235-22, scale 1:200,000 (UNCLASSIFIED) ABSTRACT 1. (S/WN) Kapustin Yar Cruise Test Complex D, Site 1, referred to in this report as Complex D, is a major Soviet facility supporting the development and testing of ground-launched, air-breathing cruise vehicles. This includes vehicles with reconnaissance, target, and probable land-attack missions. This re- port discusses all construction activity observed at Complex D and all cruise vehicle programs related to this facility. 2. (S/WN) This is the first NPIC basic report on Complex D and it satisfies the basic reporting requirement for that installation. A location map, 44 annotated photographs, two conceptual drawings, and three inset tables of mensural data are included in this report. The information cutoff date is 3. (S/WN) Kapustin Yar Cruise Test Complex D, Site 1, (Figure 1) is in the southwestern USSR approximately 140 kilometers (km) southeast of Volgograd and 19 km north of Akhtubinsk Flight Test 25X1 25X1 4. (S/WN) Complex D is a component of the Vladimirovka Advanced Weapons and Research Complex (VAWARC) and is a major test and development center for ground-launched cruise vehicles. This facility also serves as the major target drone launch facility supporting air-to-air missile (AAM) testing at the VAWARC. Cruise vehicle/drone programs that have been associated with Complex D include probable large surface-launched aerodynamic missiles,' the DR-1 (LA-17) target and reconnaissance drones, the DR-2 (Luggage) long-range reconnaissance drone, the DR-3 (ADV-1) battlefield reconnais- sance drone, the ADV-2 probable long-range reconnaissance drone, the ADV-4 probable battlefield reconnaissance drone, and a probable long-range, ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM). 5. (S/WN) Support for the cruise vehicle development programs at Complex D is primarily provided by three installations: Akhtubinsk FTC, Ramenskoye FTC and Kapustin Yar Complex D 25X1 Center SSM Support Facility BASIC DESCRIPTION 6. (S/WN) Complex D (Figure 2) is a rectan- gular, triple-fence-secured facility with dimensions of approximately 3,500 by 650 meters. The long axis of the Complex is oriented north/south. Com- plex D consists of four areas: Site 1 (the southern- most area), Site 2, Site 3, and Site 4 (the northern- most area). When first identified in September 1957, only Site 1 and Site 2 were under construc- tion (Figure 3). By December 1959, construction was well underway at Sites 3 and 4. (A detailed construction history for each site is presented in paragraphs seven through 20.) Construction History 7. (S/WN) Site 1 (Figure 4) was probably ini- tially constructed to support a large, surface- launched aerodynamic missile program. Most of the permanent structures had been completed by September 1957. These included the main con- crete launch pad, the rail-served launch structure and an associated rail-mounted tower crane, the launch control bunker (item 5), a small personnel bunker (item 6), three support buildings (items 2, 3, and 8), a probable pumphouse (item 9), a par- tially buried water/POL storage tank, and a large catch basin. In addition, Kapustin Yar Complex D SSM Support facility, which is connected by rail to Site 1, was under construction at this time. 8. (S/WN) Between September 1957 and De- cember 1959, the Site 1 launch pad was being expanded to accommodate a fixed erector/laun- cher device and launch rail probably used by another large, surface-launched aerodynamic mis- sile. Other additions to Site 1 included an opera- tions support building (item 1), a probable track- ing support building (item 10), two general sup- port buildings (items 4 and 7), four optical trackin- WNINTEL Z-14643/82 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET g/recording positions, and a second partially un- ?derground water/POL tank. 9. (S/WN) By February 1962, a large concrete support apron and loop road had been added to the Site 1 launch pad. A large light tower was erected in the middle of the support apron. A drive-down entrance extending under the apron is on the northwest side of the apron. In addition, this apron is flanked by two tall lightning arresters. 10. (S/WN) By April 1965, some of the struc- tures built to support the probable large, surface- launched aerodynamic missile programs had been dismantled. Both the fixed erector/launcher and the large traveling tower crane which support the rail-served launch structure had been removed. 11. (S/WN) Only a few changes to the facili- ties at Site 1 have been noted since 1965. These included the dismantlement of the entrance to the personnel bunker (item 6), the removal of a part of the pumphouse roof (item 9), and the addition of several optical tracking/recording positions. 12. (S/WN) Site 2 (Figure 5) was initially iden- tified under construction in September 1957. All major construction in this area had been halted by December 1959 with the site still largely incom- plete. The cruise vehicle which Site 2 was intended to support has never been identified. It is likely KAPUSTIN YAR CRUISE TEST COMPLEX D, SITE 1 AKHTUBINSK/VLADIMIROVKA that this program was cancelled prior to the start of its flight testing which led to the cessation of construction at Site 2. Since 1959, Site 2 has prima- rily served as a storage/support area for Sites 1 and 3. Structures completed in this area include two small, irregularly shaped concrete pads, a large control bunker (item 3), a small control bunker (item 4, dismantled in 1976), a large storage/park- ing apron, and two support buildings (items 1 and 2). The base of a partially underground water/POL tank was in place by December 1959; however, this tank was never completed. 13. (S/WN) The construction of Site 3 (Figure 6) began after September 1957. By December 1959, most of the major facilities in this area were either complete or under construction and testing had already begun on the DR-2. The completed facili- ties included the main concrete launch pad and loop road, a small partially underground control building, a large U-shaped revetment with a cen- tral support building, several general support buildings (items 4, 5, and 8), and five probable optical tracking/recording positions. In addition, a large, drive-through checkout building (item 1) and a large operations/administration building (item 2) were in the midstages of construction. 14. (S/WN) By April 1962, both the checkout building and the large operations/administration (Continued p. 8) AKHTUBINSK FLIGHT TEST CENTER AKHTUBI NSK/VLADI MIROVKA AREA AIRFIELD FIGURE 1. LOCATION OF KAPUSTIN YAR CRUISE TEST COMPLEX D, SITE 1, USSR -2- SECRET KAPUSTIN YAR COMPLEX D SSM SUPPORT FACILITY Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010102101: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010102101: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Iq Next 2 Page(s) In Document Denied Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET building had been completed. A heating plant (item 3) was also constructed. The previously iden- tified small control building was also removed. 15. ' (S/WN) Since April 1962, construction ac- tivity at Site 3 has mainly been limited to small structures built to support specific cruise vehicle programs. A small concrete launch ring had been completed by June 1964. This construction has been used as a launch position for the DR-2, the DR-3, the ADV-2, and the ADV-4. A large control building (iterrr.9), replacing the original small con- trol building, was identified in April 1971. A large checkout tent has been present at Site 3 since January 1973. This tent originally supported the early -testing of the DR-3 and later supported the ADV-2 program. A small vehicle storage building (item 6) had also been completed by 1973. A Quonset-type storage/support building (item 7), started in September 1978, was completed during June 1979. A small checkout tent supporting the ADV-4 program was first observed in September 1979. 16. (S/WN) Site 4 (Figures 7 and 8) was first identified under construction in December 1959. As Site 2, this area was never completed. However, Site 4 has been used for field-testing/training exer- cises of both the DR-2 and DR-3. In December 1959, grading for the launch pad was underway. A large excavation, probably for a control bunker, was immediately north of the launch area. One onsite support building and two general support buildings were also under construction. 17. (S/WN) By April 1962, the launch pad had been partially finished with concrete and the pre- viously identified onsite support building and gen- eral support buildings had been completed. An additional support building had also been con- structed. 18. (S/WN) A probable optical tracking/re- cording position had been added to Site 4 by April 1965 (Figure 7). 19. (S/WN) Between April 1965 and April 1971, several significant changes to Site 4 were identified. The onsite support building was dis- mantled/destroyed (Figure 8) and all the other general support buildings were razed. A graded- earth launch ring, similar to the concrete launch ring at Site 3, was added northeast of the incom- plete Site 1 launch pad. This ring was later finished with concrete. 20. (S/WN) A second graded-earth launch ring was identified approximately 800 meters north of Site 4 in August 1973. Cruise Vehicle Test Programs 21. (S/WN) This section of the report deals with the cruise vehicle systems that have been associated with Complex D. Each system will be discussed separately and will include the follow- ing: a description of equipment associated with the system, a general summary of the test pro- gram, and a detailed analysis of the significant events observed during the test program. Early Surface-to-Surface Cruise Missile Programs 22. (S/WN) The first test programs con- ducted at Complex D probably involved large sur- face-launched aerodynamic missiles with a land- attack mission. Although these missiles were never observed, it is possible that their design was influ- enced by two US surface-to-surface cruise missiles (SSCMs), the SNARK and the NAVAHO, which were under development in the 1950s.2 The Soviet SSCMs were probably `launched from two large devices observed at Site 1. 23. (S/WN) The first of these devices, proba- bly completed in 1957, was the rail-served launch structure (Figure 9). The launcher is at the end of a railspur connecting Site 1 with the SSM support complex. This launcher is comprised of two major components, the erecting/launching mechanism and a large curved section. The erecting/launch- ing mechanism is wide. This mechanism pivots, with the aft portion traveling along a single rail mounted atop the launcher's curved section. Two probable blast ar- eas are behind the curved section. The location of the blast areas indicates that the erecting/launch- ing mechanism was inclined at least 45 degrees for launches. The blast areas also indicate that the main launch orientations from this launcher were 90 degrees and 20 degrees. A large rail-mounted tower crane (Figure 10) was probably used to ser- vice the vehicle on the launcher. 24. (S/WN) The second device identified at Site 1, the fixed erector/launcher (Figure 10), was constructed between 1957 and 1959. An irregularly shaped probable erecting mechanism is situated at the western end of the fixed launcher. A 33-meter- long, probable, dual-launch rail extends eastward from the erecting mechanism. The probable launch orientation from the fixed erector/laun- cher was approximately 90 degrees. 25. (S/WN) The US SSCMs SNARK and NA- VAHO proved to be heavy, inaccurate, and vul- nerable to interception and were abandoned in favor of ICBMs. It is likely that similar problems were encountered with the Soviet SSCM pro- grams, as none were ever deployed. By 1965, the rail-mounted tower crane which supported the rail-served launch structure had been removed. Also removed was the erecting mechanism for the fixed erector/launcher. No further activity relating to these launch devices has been identified. Probable Target/Reconnaissance Drones 26. (S/WN) DR-1. The DR-1 (LA-17) is a straight-wing subsonic drone powered by a turbo- jet engine mounted under the fuselage. Designed in the early 1950s by the Lavochkin Experimental Design Bureau (OKB), the DR-1 has been used in both the target and reconnaissance roles.3 27. (S/WN) The DR-1 (Figure 11) is0 25X1 long with afuselage diameter. The wing 25X1 span of this vehicle is The ventral- 25X1 mounted engine nacelle is 4 meters long with a diameter. 28. (S/WN) The DR-1 launcher (Figure 11) is a two-axle towed carriage. A small launch rail is mounted atop the carriage. The overall length of -8- SECRET (Continued p. 12) Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET OPTICAL TRACKING/ RECORDING POSITION Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01 : CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET FIGURE 10. RAIL-MOUNTED TOWER CRANE AND FIXED ERECTOR/LAUNCHER, SITE 1 r-I Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01 : CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET 29. (S/WN) The ground-launched version of the DR-1 (LA-17) is assisted at launch by two strap- on boosters (Figure 12). These boosters are ap- proximately~long with a diameter oc--] meter. 30. (S/WN) The DR-1 has been present at Complex D, Site 1, since at least April 1965. The number of deployed DR-1 launchers at Site 1 in- creased from two in the 1960s to as many as five by 1978. Since late 1980, four DR-1 launchers have normally been observed. 31. (S/WN) Akhtubinsk/Vladimirovka ASM and AAM Storage Facility a com- ponent of Akhtubinsk FTC, has served as t e main receiving/storage/checkout facility for the DR-1 since the 1960s. When required for launches, the DR-1s are shipped by road from the storage facility to Complex D (Figure 13). 32. (S/WN) The DR-1 has been used at the VAWARC primarily as a target for AAM testing. However, reconnaissance variants of this drone have probably also been flight tested at Complex D. Evidence of a probable DR-1 reconnaissance drone field-testing/training exercise was obtained in June 1978. On 7 June, two DR-1 launchers, one with a DR-1 (Figure 14), were deployed approxi- mately 500 meters south of Site 1. Several support trucks, trailers, and tents were also observed. This equipment was not from Site 1, which still had five previously identified DR-1 launchers. All of the field-deployed equipment had been removed by 4 July. This field deployment of the DR-1 may have been related to a similar DR-2 deployment and a possible DR-3 deployment which occurred in the VAWARC area during the summer of 1978. 33. (S/WN) DR-2. The DR-2 (Luggage; RAM- A) is a large, delta-wing, turbojet-powered rec- onnaissance drone associated with the Tupolev OKB. This vehicle is designed for high-altitude, supersonic flight with a maximum range of over 3,000 km.4 34. (S/WN) The DR-2 (Figure 15) has a 26- meter fuselage with a maximum diameter ofC 25X1 meters. The forward end of the fuselage tapers to a point. The large delta wings are mid-mounted on the fuselage and have a span of 8 meters. Large, triangular, horizontal stabilizers, with a span ofL meters, are at the rear of the fuselage and a single vertical stabilizer is mounted atop the aft fuselage section. 25X1 25X1 35. (S/WN) The original flight testing of the DR-2 involved the use of a probable fixed inclined launcher at Site 3 (Figure 16). This launcher was approximately 21 b 2 meters. The launcher was approximately high at the aft end and 25X1 high at the forward end. Launches con- 25X1 ducted from this device had a heading of approxi- mately 90 degrees. This launcher was only ob- served in December 1959. 36. (S/WN) Since at least 1964, the DR-2 has used a towed semitrailer transporter/launcher (Figure 15). This semitrailer is Ometers. 25X1 When set up in its firing position, the front end of the launcher is slightly raised while the aft end is at ground level. - 12 - SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01 : CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Iq Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET 37. (S/WN) A large, chamfer-roofed van trailer probably serves as the main checkout vehi- cle for the DR-2. This checkout van trailer (Figure 15) is Several fuel/oxidizer and cargo trucks also support DR-2 launch operations. 38. (S/WN) Flight testing of the DR-2 began between 1957 and 1959. In December 1959, the probable fixed inclined launcher was present, along with several support vehicles, at Site 3. Blast marks behind this device confirmed its use as a launcher. This fixed inclined launcher was proba- bly used primarily for the initial aerodynamic and propulsion testing of the DR-2. 39. (S/WN) In June 1964, a DR-2 was first observed on the towed transporter/launcher. Launches were being conducted from the newly constructed launch ring at Site 3. In July 1966, two DR-2s were identified for the first time at Complex D (Figure 17). Testing of this system at Site 3 continued throughout the remainder of the 1960s. It was also during this time that DR-2-associated equipment was identified in the Tupolev area of Ramenskoye FTC, firmly linking that OKB with the DR-2 program. 40. (S/WN) The DR-2 had been deployed in limited numbers by the early 1970s and DR-2- related activity observed within the VAWARC area during this time was probably indicative of field- training exercises and not developmental testing. At Complex D, these exercises were conducted within Site 4 where two launch rings had been constructed by 1973 (Figure 18). Exercises within this area were detected in August and September 1973, February and March 1976, September 1976, and August 1978. 41. (S/WN) DR-3. The DR-3 (ADV-1) is a small, subsonic, low-altitude, battlefield reconnais- sance drone developed by the Tupolev OKB. The DR-3 is propelled by a solid-propellant booster and a turbojet sustainer engine.5 42. (S/WN) The DR-3 (Figure 19) is 7 meters long with a maximum fuselage diameter ofC meter. It has an aft-mounted, clipped delta wing with a span of A single vertical stabil- izer is mounte atop the aft section of the fuse- lage. The air intake for the turbojet sustainer en- gine is mounted atop the fuselage approximately aft of the nose. 43. (S/WN) The original prototype launcher for the DR-3 (Figure 20), used prior to 1975, is a 16- meter-long flatbed trailer. The aft end of this launcher is wide. A box-like structure is mounted atop the trailer approximately 6 meters aft of the launcher's front end. This structure isC meters long, wide, and 0 high. The box-like structure probably simulated a por- tion of the launch canister seen on the operational DR-3 transporter-erector-launcher (TEL). 44. (S/WN) The DR-3 TEL (Figure 20), used to launch the DR-3 since 1975, is a variant of the ZIL- 135 8x8 wheeled vehicle. The TEL has an overall length of and a width of Mounted on the back portion of the TEL is the launch canister which is 8 meters long and E meters in diameter. A large end cap covers each end of the canister. The front end of the canister is elevated approximately 20 degrees for launch pur- poses. A probable sliding tray/rail (Figure 21) is contained within the launch canister. 45. (S/WN) The DR-3 resupply vehicle (Fig- ure 22) is also a variant of the ZIL-135. This vehicle is 13 meters long overall with a maximum width of 3 meters. The aft portion of the resupply vehicle is a 9-meter-long cargo area covered by ribbed can- vas.9 46. (S/WN) The DR-3 is shipped in a unique container (Figure 22) which is Two distinct ribs/handling bands extend longitudi- nally atop the container. 47. (S/WN) Testing of the DR-3 probably be- gan at Complex D during the early 1970s. These tests were accomplished using the prototype laun- cher which was first observed at Site 3 in January 1972. This launcher (Figure 23) was used until the DR-3 TEL became available in 1975. During this time period, DR-3-associated equipment was re- peatedly observed in the Tupolev area of Ramen- skoye FTC and at Akhtubinsk FTC. Testing of the DR-3 at Complex D was confined to Site 3 until August and September 1977. During this time, a large-scale field-testing/training exercise was con- ducted at Site 4 (Figures 24 and 25). The DR-3 was probably first deployed to operational units during 1977 or 1978. Testing of the DR-3 continued at Site 3 through April 1979. revealed 25X1 an open TEL with a probable DR-3 (Figure 26). DR- 3 testing was moved to Site 1 in June 1979 probably to make room for increased ADV-2 testing at Site 3. With an apparent standdown in ADV-2 activity, the DR-3 resumed testing at Site 3 in July 1982. 48. (S/WN) ADV-2. The ADV-2 is a large aerodynamic cruise vehicle which has been under- going flight testing at Complex D since at least 1976.6 This vehicle, which was probably designed by the Tupolev OKB, utilizes a probable solid rocket booster and a turbojet/turbofan sustainer engine.? The intended function of the ADV-2 has yet to be confirmed. The association of the ADV-2 with the Tupolev OKB, which developed the DR-2 and DR-3 systems, suggests a reconnaissance mis- sion. However, the use of the ADV-2 in a land- attack role is also possible. 49. (S/WN) The ADV-2 is similar in appear- ance to the smaller DR-3. It is likely that the design of the ADV-2 was greatly influenced by the success of the earlier Tupolev reconnaissance drone. Three versions of the ADV-2 have been identified. The three vehicles differ from each other primarily in the design and location of the various control/ lifting surfaces. All three variants, designated ADV- 2a, ADV-2b, and ADV-2c (Figure 27), have aC meter fuselage with a diameter. As the DR-3, all variants of the ADV-2 have a dorsal- mounted air intake on the aft portion of the fuse- lage. A single vertical stabilizer is mounted atop the rear of the vehicle. 50. (S/WN) The ADV-2a (Figure 28), first ob- 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 served on has aft-mounted, 25X1 clipped delta wings with a s an of and a 25X1 root chord of Two sets of rounded 25X1 foreplanes are on the forward section of the fuse- 25X1 lage. - 15 - SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET - 17 - SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET I)cv-I 25X1 - 19 - SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET 51. (S/WN) The ADV-2b (Figure 28), first ob- served on has clipped delta wings with a span of and a chord of meters: A single set of clipped foreplanes is mounted forward on the fuselage. , 52. (S/WN) The ADV-2c (Figure 29), first identified on also has a single set of foreplanes similar to those on the ADV-2b. The wings of the ADV-2c, however, are of simple delta design (not clipped) with a span of a chord of 53. (S/WN) The ADV-2 prototype launcher (Figure 30), of which two have been identified, is a double-axle towed trailer. A raised cradle used to support the ADV-2, is centerline mounted on the trailer and is The prototype launchers are towed from the for- ward end. 54. (S/WN) The new-type ADV-2 launcher (Figure 31) is also a towed trailer but is towed from the aft end. The new-type launcher is equipped with a hinged platform which supports the for- ward section of the ADV-2. When this platform is lowered, the launcher is long. When raised, the launcher is long. The launch cradle on the new-type launcher is re- cessed and is long. Two of the new-type ADV-2 launchers have been observed to date. 55. (S/WN) The ADV-2 transporter (Figure 32) is also a towed Olong, double-axle trailer which is normally canvas covered. The can- vas is draped over a light framework which gives this vehicle a ribbed appearance. 56. (S/WN) The ADV-2 checkout van trailer (Figure 28) is a long, chamfer-roofed vehicle. Eight vents, four along each side of the 2 Al chamfered roof, and two box-like protrusions have been identified on the van body. This van trailer is probably used for electronics/guidance system checkout of the ADV-2. 57. (S/WN) All of the ADV-2-associated towed trailers have been observed attached to KRAZ-214/255 or ZIL-131 prime movers. 58. (S/WN) The ADV-2 special-purpose vehi- cle set (Figure 33), first observed in June 1979, is, comprised of two tracked vehicles and one van- bodied truck. The tracked vehicles are meters. The van-bodied truck is a probable URAL- 375 workshop. These vehicles are normally ob- served at the Site 3 launch pad when the ADV-2 is being prepared for flight (Figure 28). It is likely that the special-purpose vehicle set serves some checkout/calibration function for the ADV-2. 59. (S/WN) The ADV-2 booster (Figure 31) is a probable solid rocket motor used to assist the launch of the cruise vehicle. The identification of spent boosters downrange from Complex D (Fig- ure 12) indicates that the booster is jettisoned immediately after launch. The ADV-2 booster is shipped in a rectangular container (Figure 31) 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 which is wide, and 25X1 meter high. 60. (S/WN) AD airframe (Figure 34) which has been observed mounted under the port wing of a BACKFIRE B may also be associated with the ADV-2 program." An ADV-2 checkout van - 21 - SECRET (Continued p. 26) 2.25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010102101: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Q Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010102101: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET -24- SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET trailer was observed adjacent to the BACKFIRE- mounted airframe during May 1980 at Akhtubinsk FTC. The use of the ADV-2-associated van trailer suggests that the airframe contains an electronics/guidance system similar to that of the ADV-2. No control/lifting surface has ever been observed on the airframe. 61. (S/WN) The development of the ADV-2 appears to have incorporated three phases of test- ing. The first phase was probably for basic aerody- namic, control, and propulsion evaluation. The second phase of testing produced aerodynamic changes to the ADV-2 and probably developed the ADV-2 electronics/guidance systems. The third phase was characterized by a significant increase in ADV-2 launch activity and may be a precursor to an operational deployment of this system. 62. (S/WN) ADV-2-associated equipment was first identified in the Tupolev area of Ramenskoye FTC during 1974. Testing of this system at Complex D had begun by 1975 where an ADV-2 transporter was observed in May. This first phase of testing involved the ADV-2a and the first prototype launcher, both of which were originally observed at Site 3 on (Figure 20). This testing continued through at least April 1977. None of the support equipment tentatively associ- ated with the ADV-2 electronics/guidance system was observed during this period. These initial tests were probably to evaluate the aerodynamic, con- trol, and propulsion characteristics of the ADV-2. 63. (S/WN) The testing of the ADV-2 elec- tronics/guidance system components probably be- gan in 1978 and continued into 1981. During this period, several significant events, probably related to the electronics/guidance testing, were ob- served.. In May 1978, an ADV-2 checkout van trailer and RSBN-4N short-range navigational aids (Figure 35) were deployed to Site 3. By December 1978, the second prototype launcher was at Com- plex D. ADV-2b testing from this launcher began in February 1979. Testing of the BACKFIRE- mounted airframe began in May 1979 at Ramens oye FTC. The ADV-2-associated spe- cial-purpose vehicle set was deployed to Complex D in June 1979. The airframe and an ADV-2 checkout van trailer were observed at Akhtubinsk FTC during May 1980. Aerodynamic refinement of the ADV-2 led to the ADV-2c which began testing on the second prototype launcher in May 1980. In June 1980, an ADV-2, two ADV-2 checkout van trailers, and the airframe were transferred from Complex D and Akhtubinsk FTC to Ramenskoye FTC. In December 1980, ADV- 2c testing from the first new-type launcher began at Complex D (Figure 36). The identification of spent ADV-2 boosters downrange from Site 3 indi- cated that at least two, southeast-oriented launches had been conducted from the new-type launcher by June 1981. All previous ADV-2s had been launched in an easterly direction. 64. (S/WN) The third and possibly final pre- deployment phase of ADV-2 testing was con- ducted at Complex D from August 1981 through May 1982. At least 15 ADV-2c launches occurred during this period. All of these launches were conducted from the new-type ADV-2 launchers, the second of which arrived at Site 3 in April 1982. Three launch orientations were used for these tests: east, southeast, and south-southeast. No sightings of either the ADV-2 checkout van trailer at Complex D or the airframe at Ram- 25X1 enskoye FTC were made during this time. It is 25X1 likely that the guidance system and possibly a reconnaissance package for the ADV-2 had been fully developed by August 1981 and that subse- quent testing was of the complete ADV-2 system. 65. (S/WN) No ADV-2 or ADV-2-associated launch activity has been observed at Complex D since May 1982. This apparent hiatus in launch activity was accompanied by the removal of ADV-2 equipment from Site 3 (Figure 37). During June and July, the missile checkout tent was dismantled. One of the new-type ADV-2 launchers and the associated special-purpose vehicle set were re- moved. All of the solid rocket booster shipping containers were also removed. 66. (S/WN) The significant decrease1in ADV- 2-associated activity and equipment at Complex D may indicate that the test program of this probable reconnaissance drone has been completed. If the Soviets intend to operationally deploy the ADV-2, field-training exercises, similar to those observed for the DR-2 and DR-3, may be conducted in the 25X1 near future. 67. (S/WN) ADV-4. The ADV-4 is a small, TEL-launched cruise vehicle on which testing be- gan at Complex D during 1978. This vehicle is probably intended to be used as a highly mobile, short-range battlefield reconnaissance drone. 68. (S/WN) The ADV-4 (Figure 38) is 3 meters long with afuselage diameter. The vehi- 25X1 cle has a tapered straight wing with a span of 0 25X1 meters, a wing root chord of and a 25X1 wing-tip chord of The horizontal stabil- 25X1 izer has a span of A small vertical 25X1 stabilizer is mounted atop the rear the fuselage. The configuration of the ADV-4 engine has not yet been identified on imagery. 69. (S/WN) The ADV-4 TEL (Figure 38) is a tracked vehicle similar in appearance to the M- 25X1 1974 122mm self- ropelled gun chassis. The chassis is Mounted atop the chassis is a 25X1 probable launch rail and erecting mechanism. The 25X1 rail is mounted offset to the right. A unique cham- fered cover has often been observed on the TEL (Figure 39). The cover, with an overall length of= 25X1 meters, overhangs the rear of the chassis by ap- proximately 2 meters. As many as two TELs have been observed at Complex D. 70. (S/WN) An ADV-4 TEL was first identified at Site 3 in May 1978. A small checkout tent which has been associated with the ADV-4 program had been erected by June. In April 1979, the second ADV-4 TEL was first identified at Site 3. 71. (S/WN) By April 1981, three sightings of the ADV-4 had been made at Site 3. Twice, on 25X1 and on (Figure 40), this 25X1 vehicle was observed on a TEL. Ono a 25X1 probable canvas-covered ADV-4 airframe was identified in the cargo bed of a ZIL-131 truck (Figure 41). 72. (S/WN) Testing of the ADV-4 continued until April 1981. From late April 1981 until March 1982, no ADV-4 launch-related activity was de- tected at Complex D. The reason for this 12-month (Continued p. 30) - 26 - SE C R E T RCA-1510006182 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Iq Next 2 Page(s) In Document Denied Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET halt in launch activity has not been determined. This may have been an evaluation period prior to the start of a new test phase. This hiatus could also have been necessitated by some problem that may have developed during the first three years of ADV-4 testing. 73. (S/WN) Testing of the ADV-4 resumed at Complex D during March 1982 and is expected to continue for some time. This testing will probably be required to fully develop the vehicle's propul- sion, guidance, and possibly a reconnaissance pay- load before it is operationally deployed. 74. (S/WN) In 1981, the Soviets began testing a probable, long-range, GLCM at Complex D.9 Equipment at Site 1 indicates that the GLCM may be related to the SS-NX-21 long-range, sea- launched cruise missile (SLCM) currently being tested at Nenoksa Naval Missile Test Center (BE 75. (S/WN) The probable GLCM launch ve- hicle is a tracked TEL (Figure 42). Atop the TEL is a centerline-mounted launch tube (Figure 43) which is long and in diameter. To date, only one probable GLCM TEL has been identified. 76. (S/WN) The probable GLCM container (Figure 42) is an shipping meter-diameter cylinder. This container is identi- cal in size and configuration to those associated with the SS-NX-21 SLCM.10 77. (S/WN) Several probable GLCM launch canisters have also been observed (Fi ure 44). The canisters are 8 meters long and in diame- ter and are normally observed inline with and downrange from the TEL. These canisters might be sealed capsules, each containing a cruise missile, which are inserted into the launch tube and ejected either during or just after launch. If so, the identification of new canisters downrange from the TEL would indicate a recent GLCM launch. However, this has never been confirmed and the exact function of the canisters still has not been determined. 78. (S/WN) The tracked TEL, minus the launch tube, was first observed with two adjacent probable GLCM shipping containers at the Site 1 support apron in October 1980. By the launch tube had been placed on the TEL and the entire assembly was moved to the launch pad. The TEL has also been cable connected to the Site 1 launch control facility. 79. (S/WN) During September and October 1981, preparations for the first probable GLCM launch were observed. By the launch tube had been removed from the TEL and two 8- meter-long cylindrical objects were by the Site 1 operations building. On a KRAZ- 214 cargo truck was observed adjacent to the TEL. The launch tube had again been placed on the TEL and the two cylindrical objects were no longer present. On Oa probable launch canister was observed adjacent to the launch pad. This canister was not inline with the TEL and was prob- ably not used for a GLCM launch. The KRAZ-214 and a support bus were also present on the launch pad. By I both the KRAZ-214 and the support bus were gone and the TEL had been canvas covered. The canvas had been removed by 80. (S/WN) The first probable GLCM launch occurred between On the TEL was canvas covered and a second probable launch canister was observed ap- proximately 170 meters downrange. The second probable GLCM launch was probably conducted in early December and a third probable launch canister was subsequently observed approximately 210 meters downrange from the TEL. A Modified CANDID B with a long tail extension was observed at Akhtubinsk FTC on This aircraft, previously associated with the SS-NX-21 SLCM program," probably supported the GLCM test ac- tivity observed in 1981. 81. (S/WN) A third probable GLCM launch occurred between Ima- gery ofl revealed a fourth probable GLCM launch canister approximately 160 meters down- 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 range from the TEL. The first two launch canisters 25X1 were not present and vehicle tracks in the Site 1 area indicated that they had been recovered byF-] 25X1 I 25X1 82. (S/WN) The GLCM currently being de- veloped at Complex D is most likely a variant of the SS-NX-21. Testing of the GLCM will probably 25X1 continue for some time and the operational de- ployment of this system is not expected before late 1983 or 1984. Helicopter Sightings 83. (S/WN) On three occassions since 1975, a helicopter has been observed on the large stor- age/parking apron at Site 2. The first two sightings were of new attack/assault helicopters which were probably undergoing weapons testing at the VAWARC. The third sighting was of a helicopter probably being used to support a cruise vehicle test at Complex D. 84. (S/WN) A HIND D combat assault heli- copter was at Site 2 on (Figure 45). The HIND D at the VAWARC was probably related to the helicopter's weapons test program. HIND D was first operationally deployed in 1976.92 85. (S/WN) A camouflage-painted HELIX B amphibious assault/fire support helicopter13 was at Site 2 on (Figure 46). This 25X1 25X1 helicopter was probably involved in some prelimi- LOAM nary weapons testing at the VAWARC. To date, the HELIX B has not been operationally deployed. 86. (S/WN) A HIP C probable range-support helicopter was at Site 2 on (Figure 47). Activity at Site 3 indicated that an ADV-2 test was in progress on that date. It is likely that the HIP C at Complex D or[:=was used to support the ADV-2 test. -30- Z-14643/82 SECRET 2.25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Iq Next 5 Page(s) In Document Denied Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 SECRET the preparation of this report. (S/WN) All applicable satellite imagery acquired through) Ithe information cutoff date, was used in 25X1 MAP OR CHART US Air Target Chart. Series 200, Sheet 0235-22, scale 1:200,000 (UNCLASSIFIED) DOCUMENTS 1. CIA/NPIC. PIC/JR-1015/61, Probable Aerodynamic Missile Facilities, Kapustin Yar/Vladimirovka Missile Test 2. Salamander Books Ltd. "Rockets and Missiles, Surface-to-Surface Land Strategic," 1979, pp 58 and 59 (UNCLASSIFIED) Center, USSR, (S), Apr 61 3. FTD. FTD-1330W-107-75-SAO, Soviet Remotely Piloted Vehicles (U), 16 Jun 75 (TOP SECRET -Extracted information is classified SECRET. 4. DIA. DST 2660P-107-81 SAO, Trends and Developments Foreign Technology Weapons and Systems, Aerodynamic Systems, Soviet Drones (U), 16 Mar 81 (TOP SECRET -Extracted information is classified SECRETI IIAR-0176/80. Development of Soviet Aerodynamic Cruise Vehicle-ADV-2 (S), Nov 80 (TOP SECRET -Extracted information is classified SECRET 7. NPIC. Z-15239/82, Aerodynamic Vehicle Activity, Kapustin Yar Cruise Test Complex D Site 1, USSR, 11 Jun 82 (SECRET 8. NPIC.F I IAR-A111/80, ADV-2-Associated Probable Checkout Van/Trailer Identified at Akhtu- binsk Flight Test Center, USSR (S), Jun 80 (TOP SECRET Extracted information is classified SECRET 9. NPIC. Z-14519/82, IAR-0007/82, Cruise Vehicle-Related Activity at Kapustin Yar Cruise Test Complex D, USSR, August 1981-9 February 1982 (S), Feb 82 (SECRET 81 (TOP SECRET -Extracted information is classified SECRET/WNINTEL. 11. NPIC. RCA-16/0001/81, Akhtubinsk Flight Test Center (5), Dec 81 (TOP SECRET -Extracted information is classified SECRET/WNINTEL. 12. DIA. DST-1340S-224-81, HIND Helicopter System (U), 12 Jun 81 (SECRET -Extracted information is classified CONFIDENTIAL. 13. DOD/Department of the Army, PIM17-82, ATC-11-1340-049-82, HELIX Helicopter (U), Jan 82 (SECRET COMIREX P02 Project 542060P (S) Comments and queries regarding this report are welcome. They may be directed tol I Warsaw Pact - 37 - SECRET 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 2 A11 25X1 25X1 7FX1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 2bAl 25X1 25X1 25X1 2 A11 25X1 25X1 25X1 2 A11 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6 Secret Secret Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/02/01: CIA-RDP83T00574R000103060001-6