SPECIFIES ON RESEARCH AND ON SAFE
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP83M00914R000700070023-7
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
1
Document Creation Date:
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date:
September 27, 2006
Sequence Number:
23
Case Number:
Publication Date:
June 11, 1982
Content Type:
MEMO
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP83M00914R000700070023-7.pdf | 46.69 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2@b9i16 18 :U~fA-Wb 83M00914R000700070023-7
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
Science and Technology Advisory Panel
STAP-0011/82
11 June 1982
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
SUBJECT: Specifies on Research and on SAFE
suffered are far ahead and OSO is using STAY
technologies of the '50s 25x1
1. With respect to your questions on 8 June 1982, it appears to me that
the research effort in OTS in the last few years has concentrated on
to such a degree that other projects have had to be curtailed
or drop pe n ORD the cause in large part has been budgetary pressures but
the result is a loss of personnel and their expertise. Some areas that have
2. In re SAFE, if it felt that yet another review group is necessary, I
recommend using available personnel who are already knowledgeable of the SAFE
concept. The names STAP suggests are:
and a user representative that
would be in a position to
do the SAFE job would include:
Science Application, Inc. (SAI)
Stanford Research Institutes (SRI)
RAND
Bolt, Baranek & Newman, Inc. (BB&N) Cambridge, MA
(developers and operators of the ARPANET, the university and
contractor network for DARPA; also developed security gateways
for COINS)
Xerox (would probably be
their own hardware)
Universities with strong expertise
Vv Brown, and Dartmouth.
Approved For Release 20CUM2L (IWR3M00914R000700070023-7
11 - N name. Software houses that would
interested in software, even without
in this area would include Stanford,