(Sanitized)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83B00823R000800050114-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 27, 2000
Sequence Number: 
114
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 14, 1975
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83B00823R000800050114-9.pdf127.88 KB
Body: 
Approved Folease 2003/06/19 : C1A-RDP83B008200800050114-9 OGC 75-1495 14 April 1975 OGC HAS REVIEWED. STATOTHR STATOTHR STATOTHR STATOTHR STATOTHR STATOTHR STATOTHR STATOTHR STATOTHR MEM.'IORANDU1NMI FOR THE RECORD 1, The Director and the undersigned met vi th and STATOTHR his attorney, on 11 April 1975, incicated that STATOTHR Ito had considered various aspects of the :law relating to Agency physical surveillance of in 1971. He indicated that the law was so ne- -,vhat cloudy, although possibly they could get an injunction. He then stated possibly their objectives could be reached in some other way. 2, 0 stated that I kvould like to review his file. Mr. . Colby indicated immediately that in the previous interview with I TATOTHR had stated he would like to look at the file, the Director's response at that _ time had been he would prefer not. The Director then stated that we would certainly permit II to review it, He pointed out, however, that we would have to review it for classified information, to delete names of Agency employees concerned and also would have to review it from the standpoint of not invading the privacy of any third party. I I asked specifically about photo- graphs and was told that these wo-Ldd be made available. The Director not only offered to let him review the file, he stated he would send him. copies of those items which could be made available. was most apprecia.tiveSTATOTHR and stated he would prefer to pick them up himself, 3, The second matter raised by II was an inquiry as to whether this file would be passed to the Rockefeller Commission and the Select Com- mitties of the Congress investigating the Agency. The Director said he would resist this most vigorously. i lasked if the Director were pressed on this could they be advised, since they would like to make their own efforts to prevent the file being transm.tted, The Director agreed to this. 4, 'ft-te third matter =rl?icl"? ~~,.aised was a question of fv n',~a1 r..iestruction of the file the A.' ency. The Director stated that this has JC eri hl. objective fo ' St7t?'ie ii ie , I"le iipointUd out, howeti er, that 11 caul of the current investigations includin spec.ifi ally nutter .~.Iansfield's lettie. ` OS J2 ,; Approved For Release 2003/06/19 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000800050114-9 STATOTHR Approved For'ase 2003/06/19 : CIA-RDP83B0082300800050114-9 requesting the Agency not destroy documents, he cannot do so at this time. However the Director stated that at an appropriate time he would destroy the C:1 _ 25X1A JOHN S , WARNER /General Counsel cc: D/Security w/OGC 75-1413 DCI Approved For Release 2003/06/19 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000800050114-9 Approved FoeiiWlease 2003/06/19 :,CIA-RDP83B008 $)00800050114-9 L ROUTING SLIP SENDER WILL CHECK CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM rnvrr Asc1VrV" CONFIDENTIAL SECRET Director ofrieG 1ri y DIRECT REPLY DISPATCH FILE INFORMATION STATOTHR . STATOTHR with I As I have indicated to you already, the Director would like to move on this as soon as possible and does want to review the sanitized file and deleted material personally, I would like to go over this prior to taking it to the Director. PREPARE REPLY RECOMMENDATION RETURN SIGNATURE Attached is my MR. of the DCIIs meeting I am also returning the package you sent to me on this material under date of 9 April 1975, since I dq not believe I need it for my files. 7 1 Ger>~r SECRE 7C UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL (40) - 7nn7- 1 FORM NO. 237 Use previous editions 1-67 LJ Approved For Release 2003/06/19 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000800050114-9