POSITION PAPER ON (Sanitized)PROPOSAL RE: THIRD AGENCY RULE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP83B00823R000800020015-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 6, 2000
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 8, 1975
Content Type: 
PAPER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP83B00823R000800020015-2.pdf80.41 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000800020015-2 8 April 1975 25X1A MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Security for Policy and Management 25X1A SUBJECT . Position Paper o Proposal re: Third Agency Rule 25X1A 1. The proposal b in paragraph 7 of attachment A, concerning "truly sensitive matters" fulfills exactly the intent of the Third Agency Rule". 2. When Executive Order 11652 became operative, a directive was issued on 17 May 1972 entitled "National Security Council Directive Governing the Classification, Downgrading, Declassification and Safe- guarding of National Security Information". This directive, in section VI, paragraph D entitled Consent of Originating Department to Dissemina- tion by Recipient, states: "Except as otherwise provided by Section 102 of the National Security Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 495, 50 USC 403, classified information or material originating in one Department shall not be dissemina- ted outside any other Department to which it has been made available without the consent of the originating Department." 3. The portion of the proposal which seeks the originating Agency or Department approval prior to release complies with the National Securit Council Directive admirably. Concern comes with that portion o proposal which states, "Where the reference concerns a Third Agency indirectly or is not considered sensitive and does not pose policy concerns, the agency concerned may forward the material to the requesting Select Committee without an item-by-item, mention-by-mention clearance with Third Agencies." He then goes on to suggest that originating 1. Emphasis provided by writer Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000800020015-2 Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000800020015-2 Departments be advised of the release of their information subsequent to the act. 4. The difficulty with the second portion of the proposal is that generally speaking no agency which is the recipient of another agency's information is in a position to judge the source, sensitivity or relationship to policy concerning the information in question. It would seem that some rather serious mistakes in judgment could be made in releasing information and advising the originator in an after-the-fact situation. 5. It is recommended that to assist the Select Committees, all Agencies and Departments attempt to determine whether they can release Third Agency information rather than refer the committee to the originating Agency. By referral we may appear to these Committees to be obstructionists whereas by determining ourselves whether informa- tion can be released we will speed the process that provides the cannittees with the information. It is further recommended that judgment of material not be made by anyone but the originator for reasons set forth in paragraph 4. 25X1A Approved For Release 2000/04/U3 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000800020015-2