(UNTITLED)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 12
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 9, 2000
• Sequence Number: 27
• Content Type: LIST

Ap` paved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83BO0
1. Establish policy relating to the security of the
Agencys Information Processing Systems.
2. Perform surveys and make security evaluation of
ongoing AIPS.
Perform surveys and make security evaluation of
contractor IPS holding Agency information.
Conduct physical and technical inspection resulting
in security determinations on inhouse areas that
will hold information process equipment.
Conduct physical and technical inspections resulting
in security determinations on contractor areas
that will hold information process equipment
information supplied by tki ag :~yr Q C (//
-o
6. Operate the computer security audit analysis program.
7. Provide representation to the computer security sub-
committee.
8. Provide representation COINS security panel.
9. Maintain the Agency Top Secret control program.
10. Develop central automate n inventory system for the
Top Secret control program.
oz
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83BOO823ROO0700020027-0
233.000,7O9Q20027-0
 IDENT IFTPQWfFOrAF"209h/03Mi Cc IAO-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
ecurity component responsible
for establishing policy'relating to the
security of the Agencys Information Processing
Systems.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, C, 1 COMPONENT: OS/P.&M/Information Systems
Security Group
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No e-'
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more, efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No w/` If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No_~If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes Noj
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No y If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 I DENT I F ~C~pTWdlf 0~f'T gjgTe 20( t~3p66'c1A.KD ?0$2s :
P evaluation of ongoing AIPS.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
II, C, 2
OOD2M27QO s i b l e
making security
COMPONENT: OS/R&M/Information Systems
Security Group
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
a3 p"7 -7y
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes i No
Who is (are) /~ b~-fi~ ary~ of this activity?
Do you fedl the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No i If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No //'
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being-pursued ~ky OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 IDENT IFI
PPT b d o~ftPWJSTCY20(t1P3 ~'094PIk 3'B?6828 OOti2D027QD sible
fo ng surveys an making security
evaluation of contractor IPS holding Agency
information.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, C, 3
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/P&M/Information Systems
Security Group
DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1 A a.? Al~p y'7
Is z e) the re erence s still in force? Yes ~No
Who is Laa-erj the bene'ficiary(j e.s of this activity?T
O0~-~-~ 1
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes L No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes /~ No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Not/
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No P---- If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anyt ing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 I DENT I FIT bed01~~~~~ 203E? ~AQ~?0$2$~hOfl2fl?s2~7ofls i b l e
for conducting physical, and technical
inspection resulting in security determination
on inhouse areas that will hold information
process equipment.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
II, C, 4
COMPONENT: OS/P.$M/Information Systems
Security Group
DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A a7 e7((
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
',,
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
.Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yesj~,--No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Ye _
s Nom
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?.
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No ___
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 I DENT I FA$ Mdo'o~RPXa sTW 20b4tO37O6 icGIARMIR8aaB
M2U?QW&W7o-Osible
for conducting physical and technical
inspections resulting in security determina-
tions on contractor areas that will hold
information process equipment using informa-
tion supplied by the CIA.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, C. S COMPONENT: OS/P.&M/Information Systems
EVALUATION:
Security Group
DATE:
What is a erence(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1 A a j
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Y N Who is (are) the beneficiary (ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? YesNo
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activi y more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the
Watergate? Yes No so, what?
ght of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how?
Is there. any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes__ No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 IDENT IFIA$IT~0 oQW- Jgjj~2O 1TO i.C(SL-RIjp83Bb82 QIIO Bible
PP or operating t e- computer security audit
analysis program.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our
25X1A
Is (are) the
Who is (are)
(s)
COMPONENT: OS/P&M/Information Systems
Security Group
DATE:
for this activity? Date(s)?
g3Acc 9''
reference(s) still in force?
the beneficiary(ies) of this
Yes / No
activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes o
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes L
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
TL ~_ t___n
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes Nom
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more, efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by. OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 DENTIFAJ;~T69dd9FOIA ~WaW20f4/?3 iQAoRQPeUPQQ~2; A7PPP2PP o4isib1e
for providing representation to the computer
security subcommittee.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, C, 7 COMPONENT: OS/P&,M/Information Systems
Security Group
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes Jf-- No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes I/ No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No-&. '
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No ----"`
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activ-ty more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No so, which component and why?
include anyt g questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
DoCanes this the aactivityctivity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 IDENT IFA~~l Q d9P01j;1 STeY120df7 /?3 iC
AQ~o oG829 ~02o? ~sible
for providing rep-resent,ation COINS security
panel.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, C. 8 COMPONENT: OS/P&M/Information Systems
Security Group
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1 A 23 /~ ?
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force? Yes ~l J No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes _ No ~--
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ii No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activ --more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anyt questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No V''Y
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 IDENT IFIACAprb oT Ke gjj 2OwomgiccixkI SS68OB234~ 2 c7Qsible
PP for maintaining th'e Agency Top Secret
control program.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, C. 9 COMPONENT: OS/P&M/Information Systems
Security Group
.EVALUATION: DATE:
What is2501-P) our reference (s) for this activit,? Date(s)?
Is .(ar ce s s Z in orce. Yes / No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes / No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes -----~No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transfer-red
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activ y--more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No / If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anyt 'ng questionable in the light.of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No'~
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 IDENTIFIpCpp o @d-ro~Weigi ~2o~~~*?? i(IA?-h&g~pbb' 22v osible
sloping ce ra au ornate inventory
system for the Top Secret control. program.
ACTIVITY CODE: II C, 10 COMPONENT: OS/P$M/Information Systems
EVALUATION:
Security Group
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes / No
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes /No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes /No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nlo0.- _
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No J~
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activi more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anyt 'ng questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No If so, what?
Approved For Release 2001/03/06 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020027-0
 ^ UNCLAS ffBved In R Ee 2001/03/06: CIA Q JQ007000ZD]024E0RET ONLY
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
25X1A
FROM:
EXTENSION
NO.
Policy and Plans Group
X5311
DATE
5 March 197
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
ildi
b
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
t
)
h
f
u
ng)
INITIALS
commen
.
ter eac
to whom. Draw a line across column a
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
Chief, Sire ia1
~
710
B5
Objective
Under
4ll
GroiqD_
~
re-
wi
ty
of Securi
Office
2.
iew view and validate all Office
v
of Security functions,
activities . . . to ensure effe -
3.
tiveness, economy and effici n
The attached documents re-
present two milestones under
4.
that objective. Milestone 1
the components identified
25X1A
their functions and activity s
PPG
Milestone 2 was establishmen
of a format for evaluating
these . . . activities,. It; is e
6.
uested that
_~
attachment
and:
7.
a) Certify that there are n
a
deletions/corrections/
additions to be made to
B.
the previous listing sub
mitted by your office.
the Identificatio
b) Review
of Activity statement on
each evaluation sheet to
ensure it fully equals t
t o.
the comparable activity
from offices listin
your
c) Use the attached format
11.
to evaluate each individ
activity.
12. Jack:
In reviewing
he li
ted a
tivit'
es, it appears that #3 and
#S should be combin
13
ed. T
e on
final i
ntent was to reflect a
.
continuing review o
ongo
ing co
tracts
but also a security
inspection of a new
contr
ctor
rior t
o operation. If you agree,
14. a possible rewrite
s:
it surve
"
or
sica
and
a
technical inspection/ resulting
t
i
in security det
t5
rmina
ions,
n con
pmen
ractor areas and/or equ
.
that
will
old a
ro
ess information supplied
I El
610 us oho~5 SECRET
^ CO
cy
.
al
USE ONLY 3 FIED