JOURNAL-OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL WEDNESDAY-8 JUNE 1966

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82R00025R000700100007-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 26, 2005
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 8, 1966
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82R00025R000700100007-1.pdf59.54 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/03/24: CIA-RDP82R00025R000700100007-1 MISSING PAGE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT MISSING PAGE(S): Approved For Release 2005/03/24: CIA-RDP82R00025R000700100007-1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2005/03/24: CIA-RDP82R00025R00070010 SECRET Journal - Office of Legislative Counsel Wednesday - 8 June 1966 Page 2 Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff, concerning the briefing of the Morse Subcommittee on Monday, 13 June at 3:30 P.M. I raised the question of a security sweep with Mr. Holt who said there was no objection from the Committee standpoint. I indicated that since there was no'objection and since this was usual practice for us, we would go ahead with a sweep. In further conversation on the substance of the briefing, Mr. Holt said that while the Subcommittee members would rob bl ask questions he would suggest that this not be included in any a ai in our prepared statement. He also said that the Subcommittee would be interested in some information concerning "Cuban refugee outfits." . I I Talked with Mr. Stark, Deputy Director of the Joint Economic Committee. We reviewed the exchange of correspondence between the Committee and the Agency relative to our cooperation in the Committee's preparation of a study on Communist China. Stark mentioned that lack of attribution to the authors of the Agency items gave them some problems since all other contributions were identified, however, he indicated that they could live with this arrangement if necessary. He pointed out, however, that he was quite certain this new study would attract considerable attention. Stark took this opportunity to mention that the Agency might want to "take a. second look" at the Rush Greenslade piece prepared for the Com- mittee's Soviet study since, as Stark put it, the item was rather "colorful." Stark was obviously thinking about the George Carver situation in making this suggestion. Approved For Releasq%fflEf4 : CIA-RDP82R00025R000700100007-1 25X1