JPRS ID: 9829 USSR REPORT ENERGY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3
Release Decision: 
RIF
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
22
Document Creation Date: 
November 1, 2016
Sequence Number: 
10
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORTS
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3.pdf1.47 MB
Body: 
APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 c~ok oNH~cin~, usF: orvi.v JPRS L/9829 8 July 1981 - USSR Re ort p _ fNERGY CFOUO 9/81) F~IS FOREIGN BROADCAST INFORMATION SERVICE - FOR OFFiCIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 NOTE JPRS publications contain information primarily from foreign newspapers, periodicals and books, but also from news agency transmissions and broadcasts. Materials from foreign-language sources are translated; t:iose from English-language sources are transcribed or reprinted, with the original phrasing and other characteristics retained. Headlines, editorial reports, and material enclosed in brackets are suppiied by JPRS. Processing indicators such as [Text) or [Excerpt] in the first line of each item, or following the last line of a brief, indicate how th~ original information was processed. Where no processing indicator is given, the infor- mation was summarized or extracted. Unfamiliar names rendered phonetically or transliterated are enclosed in parentheses. Words or names preceded by a ques- tion mark and enclosed in parentheses were not clear in the original but have been supplied as appropriate in context. Other unattributed parenthetical notes with in the body of an item originate with the source. Times within items are as given by source. The contents of this publication in no way represent the poli- cies, views or at.titudes of the U.S. Government. COPYRIGHT LAWS AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS REPRODUCED HEREIN REQUIRE THAT DISSEMINATION OF THIS PUBLICATION BE RESTRICTED FOR OFFICIAL USE Oi~iLY. APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400034414-3 FOR OFFIC[AL USE ONLY JPRS Y,/9829 8 July 1981 _ USSR REPORT ENERGY (FOUO 9/81) CONTENTS ELECTRIC POWER _ Work Continues on Construction of Chernobyl'skaya AES (V. S. Konviz; ENERGETICHESKOYE STROITEL'STVO, Apr 81) 1 FUELS Blue Gold of West Siberia (Sab~t Atayevich Orudzhev; GOLUBOYE ZOLOTO `LAPAUNOY SIBIRI, 1981) 8 ~ Results, Prospects of Petroleum Refini:Zg, Petrochemical Industry Summarized (M. F. Sisin; EKONOMIKA, ORGANIZATSIYA I UPRAVLENIYE V NEFTEPERERABATYVAYUSHCHEY I NF.~'PTEKHIMICHESKOY PROMYSHLEDTNOSTI, No 2, 1981) 13 3; - a - [III - USSR - 37 FOUO] ~nn n~r~~� � � �.c~n n~tr a~ APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 FOR OFFI('IA1. IISE ONI.Y ELECTRIC PUTnJER WORK CONTINUES ON CONSTRUCTION OF CHERNOBYL'SKAYA AES Moscow ENERGETICHESKOYE STROITEL'STVO in Russian No 4, Agr 81 pp 2-6 [Article by candidate of technical sciences V. S. Konviz: "The Second Phase of the Chernobyl'skaya AES"J [Text] At the present time, work is being conducted at the site of the Chernobyl'skaya AES on installations of the second phase of construction, while the third phase has already bpen begun. The second phase will have the same output ~ as the first, which was basically completed in 1978 and which has two generating sets with 1,000-MW RBMK [high-output, channel-type] reactors. With the commission- in g of this second phase, the electric station's output will reach 6 million kW. , Since matters regarding the design and construction of the f irst phase of the Chernobyl'skaya have been systematically covered [1-4], we will note only the high operational characteristics ~f this el~ctric power station. No more than six months are required to bring power units with RBMK-1000 reactors up to rated power. As early as a year after the rea~tors were brought up to rated power, the utilization factor of their rated capacity reaehed 75 percent, while the operational readiness factor exceeded 90 percent. The basic production equipment utilized in the f irst power units is being installed in the second phase of the AES. In the design of the second phase, however, the speed of response and the perform- ance of the reactor's emergency coolin g systems have been considerably improved. For complete condensation of steam leaking from the circuit during possible emer- gencies associated with a rupture of the largest pipes i:~ the loop used foL circu- lation of the heat-transfer medium, provisions have been made for a bubbler basin located directly under the rigid leakproof chambers of the heat-transfer medium circulation loop. Steam can be taken up into this basin in case the main safety valves on the steam lines are actuated. Such a solution excluded the necessity of installing bubblers in the machine room with its compla.cated asSembly of inedium- pressure pipelines. The reliability of the electric circuits and the power supply systems for internal AES needs has been improved. 1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The performance of the central heating installation has been increased almost two- fold (to 1,470 GJ/h) which will make it possible to provide heat to population cen- ters located in the immediate vicinity of the AES, to hothouses, etc. In the design, a great deal of attention has been devoted to questions of prote~ting - the environment. We will note in particular that the efficiency of the purifying equipment has been increased as well as that of the systems for suppressing the radioactivity of aerosol wastes an~ for special water purif ication. The capacity of sewage decontamination equipment has been doubled and provisions have been r~ade for f inal purif ication of sewage in sand f ilters. Atomic electric power stations in general and those with RBMK reactors in particular belong to the must labor-intensive installations in power-plant construction. In connectian with this, designers and builders devote 3 great deal of attention to the problem of reducing the labor expended during the installation of construction and installation operations. At atomic electric power stations with RBMK reactors, the most labor-intensive oper- ation is t:~e construction of massive concrete safety structures. Since these elec- tric stations are single-circuit, sucn structures are characteristic not only of the reactor chamber and special buildings at the construction site, but also of thz machine room where the turbine unit, condenser-purif ier, condenser-supply cir- cuit and deaerator are enclosed by massive concrete shielding. During the construction of the first phase of the Chernobyl'skaya AES, the protec- tive structures were made from cast-in-situ rei.nforced concrete. The complexity of erecting these structures increased because it was impossible to use large- diameter sheathing and difficult to insure a good-~ua.lity facing surface due to the large numb ~r of engineering shafts and embedded structural elements. Assoc iated with this, about 200,000 m2 of concrete surface on each power unit had to be plas- tered before the spec ial protective covering was applied. A considerable portion of the partitions and walls were made f rom brick and these were also plastered. In order to re~uce the amount of labor expended and ttie length of tin~a needed to erect such structures, it was necessary during the second phase of the construction of the AES t~ make maximum utilization of precast and prefabricated cast-in-situ reinforced concrete structural members as well as to reduce the number of individu- ally standing buildings at the cons~ruction site and the number of operational lines between them and the main building. However, the complex conf iguration of the framework of the AES ?~uildings and the lack of standardization in structural dimen- sions have hindered the application of precast and prefabricated cast-in-situ struc- tural elements. The ordering of three-dimensional layout solutions for the main building was complicated by the fact that the selection of the basic production ~ equipment and~the arrangement of the nuclear steam-generating installation in the second phase af constrL~tion had to be retained without changes, that is, the same as in the previous stage. It was particularly difficult to do this in the reactor section, since the reactor units, the special water-purification unit separating them and the repair unit had different ttiree-dimensional layouts and were constructed f rom different structural elements. 2 FOR OFFICIAL L'SE ONLY APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 APPROVED FOR RELEASE: 2007/02/09: CIA-RDP82-00850R000400030010-3 FUR OFFICIAL l1SE ONLY The overall width of the reactor unit (72 m) and the width of its central room (24 m) were used as the determining dimensions in the designs of the reactor sections. The reactor units (retaining the layout of the nuclear assembly and the transportation equipment) were turned to face one another. The remaining systems of the reactor section were located b etween them with all dimensions in the plan reduced to the dimensions of the construction grid by a factor of 3 m. At the same time, the equipment for special water purif ication and the gas systems were located in the lower portion cf ~he building. The repair shops for "dirty" equipment in the middle section and the exhaust ventilating system with compartments for f ilters and the unit for suppressing the r.adioactivity of aerosol wastes (UPAK), previously Iocated in a separate building, were located in the upper portion. Immediately over the exhaust fan station on the roof of the building was installed a ventilatiun stack. Such a solution eliminated the necessity of constructing cum- bersome ventilation boxes on the bridge between the main building, the ventilation - stack and the UPAK. A transport-engineering.corridor was made along the outer perimeter of the reactor section at a height of 12.5 m. Large-scale equipment can be brought in along this corridor into the repair area and up to the rail approaches. As we already know, the bedplate for the reactor section in the f irst phase of the AES was lowered to a depth of 8 m, while large areaways were situated even lower, - to a depth of 13.5 m. Only after installing these areaways, which took more than six months, were we able to get on with erecting the reactor unit proper. Consider- able difficulties arose during the waterproofing of the building's underground con- _ tour, upon which great demands are made. In the design for the main building in the second phase of the AES, the flat bed- plate of the reactor compartment was put on the same level as the areaways. The entire building was raised over the level cf the ground water, in connFCt3on with , whicti the height of the building's above-ground portion was increased. The new layout of the main building pro~ides fo"r locating immediately alongsic~~ its rear facade the reservoirs for collecting the drain water, tanks for clean and contaminated condensate, a number of auxiliary systems which previausly had been located on the production platform as well as newly created quick-response emergency coolin~ systems for the reactors. Out of the special structures on the production pla~form, only *_he storage facility for radioactive wastes with its bitumenizing apparatus, connected to the main build- _ ing by a trarisport and engineering bridge, is located separately. As a result, the so-called "dirty" zone with its several small free-standing b uildings and struc- tures has been eliminated from the general layout of the production platform. As was already noted, in the new layout f or the reactor compartment we have managed to regulate considerably the dimensions of the individual compartments and the floor plan of the building as a whole. The vertical dimensions of the majority of com- partments, however, were not changed due to the necessi*yo uf retain ing the arrange- ment of the reactor unit while they, as a rule, do not correspond to the di~�