SOVIET CONTROL OF SLAV GROUPS IN ARGENTINA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00457R000500420002-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 29, 2003
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 25, 1947
Content Type: 
IR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00457R000500420002-2.pdf274.42 KB
Body: 
Soviet Control of Slav Groups in Argentina TELLJGENCE GROUP. INTELLIGENCE REPORT COUNTRY Argentinsj'USSR f'Ba is 25X1 SUBJECT under the "Slav C(nittse of Argentina". Davidov was very successful in forming new "Aid Committees" and other front groups among the local Slavs, and managed to gain almost complete control over the Yugoslav and Bulgarian communities in Argentina. The Communists, under Davidovos orders, very quickly controlled the Yugoslav, and Bulgarian clubs, societies, and, organizations already existent, and then united these and the many new entities which they formed under master organizations called "Yugoslavia Libre" and "Bulgaria Libre", respectively. Davidov did not find all the other Slav groups as pliable. He experienced considerable difficulty in the organization under the "Slav Committee" of the Polish, Ukranian, Byelorussian, and other coammunities. Among other difficulties encountered were the following: 25X1 25X1 0002-2 Approved For Release 2003/08/07 : CIA-RDP82-00457R0D050004426 25X1 1 CO 'a,, 1 L DATE: 25X1UP DIST. 14 April 1947 PAGES SUPPLEMENT 1. Until the re-establishment of diplomatic relations between Argentina and Soviet Russia on 6 June 1946, the Pan-Slaty movement in Argentina was directed from the Soviet Legation in Uruguay. The-most active Soviet diplmat engaged in'such activities was Valentin Vassilievitoh Riabov, who held a consular-officer position in the Soviet Legation at 'tontevideo. 2. During this period the organization and merging of different Slav elements was handled by Dr. Tomas Davidov, a Bulgarian reportedly sent to Argentina for the express purpose of strengthening Comunism among Slav groups and of uniting them b. The Ukrauians have long desired independence, and this led many of them to The Poles feel a historical hatred toward Russia and have a deep-seated fear of Communism. Despite the fact that Davidov was helped by "::.^ Y.or -.? "Polish Communist leader, Stanislav Kotralewski, and that pressure was and is exerted on Polish citizens in Argentina by controlling their relatives residing in Poland,,, there still exists in Argentina a large number of violently anti- Camunist Poles. The continued quasi-recognition by Argentina of the diplomatic representatives of the former Polish Government, and the existence of the anti-Communist Polish language newspaper, KuEjer Poiski, have also helped the resistance of Communist domination of local o ee. support Germany during World War M. Many Ukraniana residing in Argentina hold the same belief, including the strongly anti-Communist groups called CLASSIFICATION II Appr % 1 0c /0$JA P82-0000500420002-2 H AL' 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/08/07: CIA-RDP82-00,457R000500420002-2: , CEI TRAL INTLLLIG1 NCL GROUP -2- 25X1 "Prosvits" and "V7idrozenie" (sic). On the other hand, the Ukrainian Cox- muniste in Argentina ware divided by bitter emnity into two factions: the , whioh adopted both Switlo group, led by Jose Tlaaasuk and Jaaobp tepanenko asp lav Camittee and a pro-Jewish attitude; and the Ukrainska Gazeta faction, which opposed the Slav Committee and n-^s violen y anti-Semitic. The supporters of the Ukrainska Gaze wanted no entanglement with the Argen- tine Comaunist Party i2w gi~ooroatic Commission and the Slav Union. The Idiomatic Commission of the Argentine Communist Party is apparently the body through which liaison is maintained between the Argentine Communist Party and the different ethnic Coimunist groups. The Ukrainska Gazeta faction demanded that all fuzids collected for aid be sent to the mother country, and that none be diverted for finanoing Slav Coainist activities in Argentina. In this attitude they were supported b: Sergio Stapran through his newspaper, Russ ikvA__r~gontinie, and by the followers of T~. Griforiev and the "PyelorusS1 er"r of Aid for the Fatherland." The Ukrainian Communists supporting, toe Ukrainska Gazeta were classed an Fascists by the Switlo faction. All of these ao ors caused considerable difficulty to Lain his attempt to organize and unify all Ukrainians under the Slav Committees as The Byelorussiane are a fanatically . Communistic - Slav group, but their intense hatred of the Poles caused then to look askance at any collaboration with the Polish Communists. rurthermore, the group known as "Byelorussian Center of Aid for the Fatherland", led by l4mitrio Grigoriev, closely collaborated with Sergio Stapran and the Ukrainska Gazeta faction. They strongly opposed the pro-Slav Coaamittee.Byelorusoan wed by Trofim Lassuk, the owner- editor of Nasz crolos? 5. Despite these difficulties, favidov, with the help of Kovwaleweki, persisted in his plan of unification of the Slav groups, and ouoeossfully managed to wrest control of the Slav movement in Argentina; from the soviet Legation in 1 `ontevideo? At the seine time, it appears that the Pan-Slav movement in Argentina was granted some measure of freedom from the Argentine Communist Party. 6. Shortly after the arrival in Buenos Hires of Ambassador Sergueev, Valentin Riabov R A e ires. *s transferred from i. ontevideo to the Soviet Pxnbassy in Buenos irmediately entered into close contact with the followings Davidov and Christo Gonevsky, the Bulgarian Communist leaders; Antonio Tulioh and Pedro Zanetic, the Yugoslav Communist leaders; !'iguel Rabyk, Jose Tkaozuk, and Jacobo Stepanenko, the Ukrainian Coanmunist leaders; Stanislaw Kowaleviski, the Polish Consr:unist leader; and Trofim Laszuk, the Byelorussian Communist leader. Although at first fiabov kept himself in the baohground. after the Slav Congress held. in Buenos Aires on l and 2 ;ovember 1946 he began to tame an active part in .the Pan-Slav movement in Argentina. It was at this Slav Congress that a resolu- tion was adopted changing the name of the "Slav Committee" to the "Slav Union of Argentina"? On 2 1.aroh 1947 elections were held in almost all of the different Slav Communist organizations, and chiefly through Riabov?s and L'avidov's handling of matters, t results were a triumph for the supporters of the Slav Union. Among the results-of this triumph of the Slav Union are the followings a. The newspaper Rusejik w Argentinie will probably not reappear, at least not under the management of ,erg o apran? b. :+iththe exception of Russian. Byelorussian. and Ukrainina Communist activities in Argentina, which will be directly supervised. by the Soviet Embassy in Buenos Aires, official control of other Slav groups will be carried out through the Slav'TT i,ov, It seems probable that those groups previously opposing the Slav Union will be brought into line, and forced to follow a policy outlined for them by that organization. REF EREPJUA CENT ER RAM Approved For Release 2003/08/07 : CIA-R CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE GROUP Approved For Release 2003/08/07 : CIA-RDP82-00457R000500420002-2 The resounding victory of the Slav Union is expected to result In increased Slav Communist activities* rbrthermore, the Slav Union is expected to exert even greater control over the activities of the different Slav comxnmities In Argentina. e. The Byelorussian@ are expected to become the outstanding Slav group, and Riabov has reportedly declared that they will be a spearhead of Slav Communist activities In Argentina. It is not known as yet lust how this Will affect the loom Bulgarian Communists who, up to the present time, have Rated as the secret police of the Slav Union* f. A certain Francisco Novak (Nestorozuk) has reportedly been assigned the task of unifying the Ukrainian Communist front, while Trofim Lassuk has become the undisputed leader of the Byelorussian Communists. 25X1 This document contains information effecting the national defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Acts, 50, U.SC. 31 and 32 as amended. Its transmission or the revelation of its contents twmqnc in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibted by law. Approved For Release 2003/08/07,: CIA-RDP82-00457R000500420002-2