ANTI-SOVIET COUNCIL OF WESTERN EUROPE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00457R000100790004-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 19, 2000
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 20, 1946
Content Type: 
IR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00457R000100790004-4.pdf229.56 KB
Body: 
Document No. Approved Fe NO CHANGE in ClaqA. DECLASSIFIAass. CHANGED DDA Memo, Auth: DDA REG. Date: 2000/06/06 ? CIA-RDP82-00457R000S., tr? u.s 0 IL IN _LUG NTELLIGENCEP COUNTRY France/USSR SUBJECT Anti-Soviet Ccuncil of Western Europe 25X1A6a ORIGIN 25X1X6 This ee, .ent come letter ef frralies& chst of the Next Review Date: DATE: 25X1X6 e uronegi r?, ;r. nr.e 3;z:".oe, 19/1.6E 3 20 6 December 1946 SUPP :MENT 1. A-meeting of representatives of the Russian Church of Western Europe was held in Paris at the Theological Instituter 93 rue de Crimee, from 16 to 20 October. r`V Forty-eight of the 54 parishes constituting the Western Orthodox Exarchate sent delegates to the meeting. Those present constituted an impressive quorum which, for the first time accurately reflected the state of mind of the Russiareemigration. The pro-Soviet parishes sent a delegation led by Father Constantin Zembjitsky bearing a note of protest, which was read to the assembled group. Later a UPS contingent tried to disrupt the meeting, but it was ejected. 3, The following is the text of the declaration which the pro-Soviet delegation submitted to Archbishop Vladimir, functional head of ?the Paris Orthodox Church: "Wee the. undersigned clergy and laymen, representing the _parishes which are-under the canonical jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Moscow, consider it our duty to protest solemnly against the council called by Arch- bishop Vladimir in Paris, 16 October 1946. This act was committed by Archbishop Vladimir in defiance of the orders of the Most Reverend Patriarch Alexis, dated 17 September 1946. We point out the following: (1) the anti-canonical spirit of the council; (2) the fact that not al/ of the representatives of all the parishes were admitted to sit in the council; 25X1A9a (3) the fact that the organizers of the council demanded that the priests who were admitted sign a declaration of fidelity to the Patriarchate of Constantinople. This is a fact which proves that the resolutions of the council were determined in advance.25X1A9a 25X1A2g Ft _ CONTROL U.S. OFFICIALS 016LY 'RNING el 1,1i 74- J.0,uT ses., FSP JSPDA 1 25X1A9a ADSO DADSO fOK Approved For Release 2000/06/06 : CIA-RDP82-00457R000100790004-4 25X1A2g CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE GROUP Washington, D.C. l") The following signatures were attached to this document: Archpriest Simon Velikanov, of the Parish of Nilvange ose e Canon Sorbe, vicar of the parish of Vanves; Archimandrite, Dyonises; Father Nicolas Maloletenkov, vicar of the parish of Grenoble; .....anlapai_e_ELML_Lcl_ArielBelsk_z, vicar of the parish of Notre-Dame; Archpriest Jean Zeretellis of the parish of Garonne- Archpriest Basile Timofeev, vicar of the parish of rue Michel- Serguenko, vicar of the parish of Meudon (Seino); Father Victor Kepp, vicar of the parish of Petit Clamart 4. The The protest, however, was fruitless. The principal problems discussed before the council were solved very rapidly during the first two days. Unanimity of opinion was evident from the beginning. During the evening of 17 October, an important resolution was adopted, extracts of which follow: "The Council bows with profound moral satisfaction and with gratitude before the courageous decision made by the Provisional Chief of our Exarchate, His Eminence, Archbishop Vladimir, not to carry out the ukase of the of the Patriarch of Moscow, who, in an anti-canonical fashion is attempting to annul the power of the Ecumenical Patriarch. The Council of the Archdiocese unanimously supports Archbishop Vladimir's decision. The Council of the Archdiocese sollicits Archbishop Vladimir to present to the Ecumenical Patriarch our plea to preserve the former status of our Exarchate as an autonomous Russian , Exarchate within the Ecumenical Patriarchate in conformity with the Ukases of Patriarch Photius II (of 17 February 1931) and Patriarch Benjamin I (of 29 December 1939).* Attached to this document is a plea addressed to Patriarch Maximo of Constantinople to retain Archbishop Vladimir as head of the Russian Exarchate of Western Europe? U.S. FFICIALS ONLY amilimimml/MINTSIC074 Approved For Release - 9846 000100790004-4 Approved For Release 2000/06/06 : CIA-RDP82-00457R000100790004-4 25X1A2g CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE GROUP Washington, D.C. -3 5. By '20 October the Russian Churches of Western Europe, as well as the large majority of the emigration, had officially broken all ties with Moscow. However, the calm which has returned to Russian religious life in Western Europe has incensed pro-Soviet circles. 6. Archbishop Photius, Patriarch Alexis' representative in Paris, left by plane for Moscow early in November, He is to report on the ecclesiastical situation in prance in the light of the failure of Soviet religioua policy and the results of the above-mentioned council. Photius was accompanied by S.N. Philipov, representative of the Soviet Ministry of Cults, U.S. 0 ICIALS ONLY Approved For Release 2000/06/06 : CIA-RDP82-00457R000100790004-4