REVISION OF(Sanitized)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP82-00357R000600080021-9
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 5, 2000
• Sequence Number: 21
• Publication Date: August 26, 1975
• Content Type: MF

Approved For,
~ Se-200 5/01 F A-F P.Ft84 .0 O35 00600080021-9
~ '
b~y:di tfaiei7 E2~ YtE?~l i ~1.vl
2 6 AUG 1975
DDSFTT 3410-75
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Review Staff, Office of Personnel
SUBJECT : Revision of
of Central Intelligence.
0
1. I have reviewed both the current and draft regulation. The
latter is a vast improvement over the former, since it legitimizes the
supervisory function that many SPS personnel perform and is a much more
straightforward piece of writing.
2. While I understand the reasoning behind the minimum experience
requirement occasions may arise when an individual
being consi ere -or a pose ion is fully capable of assuming SPS level
responsibilities but lacks the required seven years of experience. To
accommodate such situations, I suggest the revised regulation be modified
to permit Agency components to assign individuals with less than seven
years experience to SPS positions. Exceptions of this sort would have to
be fully justified in writing and would need the concurrence and approval
of the appropriate deputy director, Director of Personnel and the Director
Executive icer
DDS$T
Approved For n` P 110000600080021-9
~KI F.20G~ ~4.i 3 iF tY iia `.~'`381?
 ^ UNCLASSIFIED ^ INTERNAL
ONLY [] CONFl~t:NT1Al ^ SECRET
Approve or V RPM EM82-609 -24 96
. ECORD SHEET
PERS _
626 C of C 13465
Chief, Review Staff, OP
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DD/Pers-P&C
DD/Pers
5.
D/Pers
FORM L 1 O USE PREVIOUS oge Rel
3-62 v EDITIONS
RET
Chief, Review Staff
626 C of C
2 October 1975
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
Attached is a second revisApfN
the SPS Regulation, L DDS&
asked that we remove the time
restrictions on experience, and we
found that government as a whole has
gradually dropped the specific time
periods, so deleted the seven and
three year experience requirements.
[para e(1)1
In discussions we found that the
Directorates have not been obtainin
DCI approval for intea-Directorate
moves of SPS personnel for several
years. Practice becoming policy,
we dropped that requirement as well.
However, we did retain the require-
ment for DCI approval for inter-
Directorate moves and included the
review authority for vacancies and
assignments of the Supergrade Revi
Panel, albeit as far as we can find
out, the Panel has met only once
and then to discuss allotments of
positions rather than vacancy and
PqO'Dle- How ver, it is also includ
i Supergrade Personnel,
and is supposed to be a functioning
Panel.
The Comptroller representative
informally coordinated on the first
revision and had only editorial com-
ments on the Comptroller paragraph.
Do you-wish us to informally co--
ordinat agai with the Comptroller
and DDS in view of the substantia
change, though it only reflects cur
rent practice? Insofar as DDS1T is
concerned, I would think the curren
version would cause no problems .
in fact, it reflects the .r practices
2- 01020011-9 1
USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED
 0
UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET
-7
F
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
T
D ADDRESS
DATE
INITIALS
1
626 C; o C
2
z"Y
4
5
~
6
ACTION
DIRECT REPLY
PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL
DISPATCH
RECOMMENDATION
COMMENT
FILE
RETURN
CONCURRENCE
INFORMATION
SIGNATURE
Remarks t
1:.
t
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: HAMS. AD
DA
_
DID / &"
keproved For Relea 121002=4104a-&-k -19367
UNC
8/;;/75
I
,
(AA
N0. 237 Use previous editions
F0111-N67
021-9
 Approved For Release 2002/05/01 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000600080021-9
Approved For Release 2002/05/01 : -RDP82-00357R000600080021-9