INCOME OF PRIESTS OF THE RUSSIAN CHURCH IN MANCHURIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00047R000400730001-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 16, 2003
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 2, 1954
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00047R000400730001-5.pdf122.15 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2003/12/10: CIA-RDP82-00047R000400 '/hf CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY INFORMATION REPORT COUNTRY SUBJECT China (Manchuria) Income of Priests of the Russian Church In Manchuria PLACE 25X1C ACQUIRED DATE ACQUIRED BY SOURCE DATE OF INFORMATION TNIt DOC VYIMT CON TA INi TI OM AI ICTINL THE NAT1 ONAL 0[1[M I[ OI TN[ UNITED 1707[1, .:"1:01:0110 E NINNIES 01 TI TLi WIr EE CTIONI 7II PRO 704, OF THE V.L. CODE, AI AMENDED. 176 TAANIMII/WON OR HIVE. CATION OI IT1 CON TINTt TO OA At Ct III IT AN VNAVTNONIOIO P1N/ON It INONIIITID IT W. TN[ N[I A0000TIOM 01 TN 11 IO AY It IIOM1117ID. REPORT NO NO. OF ENCLS. (LISTED BELOW) SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT NO. 25X1 A S4 25X1 THIS IS UNEVALUATED INFORMATION 25X1)4 Z5X1X 1. In 1953 approximately 300,000 yuan equalled US$10. The avera a amount need. for a priest of the Russian Orthodox Church to subsist Ilat that time was about 400,OU0 Yuan, or approximately US$13. Priests did not receive state salaries. Their salaries varied. On the average, about 150,000 yuan per month were provided by the local church, plus a free dwelling and free heat. The priest' fi salary was determined by the local church council. The extra 250,000 yuan needed by the priest were earned by performing religious ceremonies, such as marriages. Local churches supported the Eparchy by contributing a certain portion, perhaps five percent, of their income. The Eparohy had no other source of income, except for divorce fees. The income of a local church depended upon the size of the congregation and the wealth or poverty of the district in which the church was located. There were four main sources of income for a local churchs (a) monthly contributions from church members, the amount being determined by their ability to contribute, (b) sale of candles, which provided quite a sizeable amount, (o) collections at services, and (d) sale of ceremonial bread. The income from the sale of ceremonial bread was divided equally between the priest and the local church, 20 The priests of the Russian Church in Manchuria were much better off before the Church came under the jurisdiction of the Moscow Patriarchate. This was particularly true prior to 1935. The local Russians were more prosperous. Many of them were employed by the Chinese Eastern Railway. Consequently, they were in a position to contribute generously to the Church. In addition, the Chinese Eastern Railway supported about half of the churches in Manchuria. 25X1X Most of these were located in the smaller towns The Railway paid 150 gold rubles monthly to each priest assigned to one of its churches. This was true only up to 1926, however, at which time the Soviets took over the Russian interest in the Railway and stopped payment of salaries to priests,, The Soviets at that time did not otherwise interfere with the Church. 25X1X 3. The relative economic position of the Russian clergy was quite low. In general, the average priest lived more poorly than the ;average layman. Some priests repaired watches to supplement their salaries. Others had to repair their own shoes, The present repatriation of Soviet nationals (former emigres) from China to the USSR will increase the economic 25X1X difficulties facing the priests. I Imost of the priests will not accept repatriation, unless the Moscow Patriarchate should offer them specific assignments to parishes in the USSR, in which case they might be tempted. CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2003/12/10 : CIA-RDP82-00047R000400730001-5 Approved For Release 2003/12/10 : CIA-RDP82-00047R000400730001-5 4a The Moscow Patriarchate did not extend material aid to the needs and, therefore, no financial aid from Moscow reached the Eparchy. Eparchy or to its parishes. The Chinese monk, Simeon, who was a bishop of the Russian Church in Shanghai, received some funds in about 1950 from the Moscow Patriarchate as a goodwill gesture. The Patriarchate sent money to the xar o h o the Far as a u only for his administrative 25X1A 25X1 25X1A 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/12/10 : CIA-RDP82-00047R000400730001-5