THE CIA SHEDS ITS OLD SHELL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81M00980R001200070016-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 1, 2004
Sequence Number: 
16
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 22, 1978
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81M00980R001200070016-5.pdf179.79 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/07/08: CIA-RDP81 M00980ROO 2000 "U016-5 WASHINGTON POST Nick Thimmesch The CIA Whatever, there is no question that the CIA, like a crustacean, has shed its old shell. The men who tracked the Soviets in the cold war, countered revolutionaries in the Third World and tried to make the Vietnam war work are gone-men like Richard Helms, James Angleton, William Colby, Ray S. Cline and Vernon Walters. The new order is younger, more spe- cialized and would never risk wearing a trench coat. They are far less likely to pound fists on tables or utter oaths when confronted with, say, the great Shthits Old Shell Outside, the pleasant campus around the Central Intelligence Agency's head. quarters looks like it does every spring -resplendent with blooming lilac and dogwood trees. The main building re- tains its strong, bureaucratic appear. ance. The friendly guards take away any ominous edge suggested by the wire fence. Inside, there are few visible changes. New TRW machines efficiently screen employees on entry. The recent "open- ness" is advertised on bulletin boards featuring clips of what the outside world is saying about the CIA these days. That information would have brought scowls to the faces of great in- telligence figures of World War II, the cold war and the Vietnam tragedy. But they are ghostly names now, as technocrats increasingly dominate the CIA. In recent years the once monolithic CIA has taken typhoon-force blows from super-liberals, hawkish jingoists and demented revolutionaries. Viet- nam, Watergate, congressional in- vestigations--all sapped its strength. The United States remains strong, so there has been a natural recovery of the CIA, but the degree is debatable. Critics claim that President Carter's order of reorganization, the resulting shift of 820 positions, the severance of 260 employees and an unimaginative, scrambling of organizational boxes the CIA undertook under Turner. The new order is more inclined toward technocratic performance. This means increased reliance on electron- ics detection, computerized data, re- search and development and studies in economics, geography, medicine, phys- ics and other sciences. Altogether, this means a huge jump In the volume of information collected. There are those who argue that the volume involves even more clandestine work by the CIA, because only by learn- ing intent can the agency evaluate the enormous accumulation of intelligence. Moreover, the CIA now lives in a world far different from the swashbuckling days of the cold war. Instead of largely focusing on the Soviet Union and Com- munist China, the agency must contend With, 150 nations and their growing eco- nomic interdependence. The Soviets remain the prime target, and the Chi? nese aren't neglected, but it's obvious the rest of the world is growing up fast. The CIA increasingly-it claims suc- cessfully-tracks terrorists, drug traf- fickers, oil discoveries and production, crop estimates and shifts of wealth, just to name some for purposes of illustrat. ing variety. These studies, usually per- formed with more precision than drama, become reasonable estimates as to what nations are capable of doing or might be compelled to do. While the CIA Increasingly benefits from technolog ce t i y r a n advantages to , Mr. Thimmesch is a syndicated overseas operatives aren't available any columnist. more. Since the murder of agent Rich. dW.1 hi ar G spiritless, teariership by Adm. Stansfield Turneq," '4 im Carter made director, agency in turmoil. `x . 4fenders say that CIA opera- tiorY' avo been improved by the changes' the quality of the intelligence produlc,-as never been better; Turner, a Navy, classmate of Carter, has no plans td leave. I . n reece, the agency has not equipped non-CIA travelers, such as newsmen, with the names of agents to contact overseas. The terrorist threat to CIA operatives is significant. .Contact betweent the CIA and the journalists specializing in foreign re- portage have also been discouraged. And many nations are now reluctant to cooperate with the CIA out of fear of having the relationship suddenly burst into print in the American Dress. Back at headquarters, the CIA still wrestles with the matter of how to handle the question of requiring em- ployees to live up to the contract they signed when hired-namely, to. clear anything written, spoken or dissemi. nated about the agency with the in- spector's office, whether they are still employed or have left the agency. There has been a rash of books and articles by former CIA people, some embarrassing, some merely illuminat- ing. Agee and Marchetti and Marks wrote books the agency didn't like. The content of Frank Snepp's book didn't bother the agency as much as Snepp's publishing it without clearance. Colby's "Honorable Men" and Walter's "Silent Mission" cleared the inspector, but might make some people smirk a bit. No reasonable American disagrees with the notion-that the most powerful nation in the world needs a set of eyes and ears out there, not only to protect itself, but also to get along. We can only hope that we are getting our money's worth from the $4 billion to $8 billion CIA spends every year. ?1878, Loa Angeles T1mea Syndicate Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP81 M00980R001200070016-5 17 Approved For Release 2004/07/08: CIA-RDP81 M0098016301 0070016-5 WASHINGTON POST Z /7') CIA Ads Recruit Doctors To Treat Agents Abroad By Thomas O'Toole Washington Post Staff Writet The Central Intelligence Agency is recruiting doctors to treat and care for overseas officers and paid agents at the agency's far-flung outposts around the world. The CIA will not say why it recruits Its own doctors, except to point out that it occasionally conducts "medical evacuations" from remote or threat- ened regions of the world where peo- ple "must be given medical support or flown out for medical treatment:' Informed sources with past ties to` the CIA said the agency has long re- lied on its own doctors in the United States and abroad, partly because it doesn't want its officers and agents drugged, anesthetized or put in com- promising medical situations where information can be extracted from them. Through an advertising agency named Gaynor and Ducas on Madison Avenue In New York, the CIA has placed advertisements for physicians in two of the nation's leading medical journals. One ran April 13 in The New England Journal of Medicine and the other ran April 21 in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Both ads :employ the same low-key pitch. They simply say: "The Central Intelligence Agency has opportunities for physicians to serve overseas. Posi- tions involve management of health care delivery systems for employes and dependents. Attractive benefits and opportunity for foreign travel. U.S. citizenship required." The salary offered by the CIA is $33,845 a year. The ads say nothing about age, experience or specialty. Presumably, the CIA is looking only for doctors who've graduated from medical school, completed their in- ternships and passed their state medi- cal boards. The CIA said it saw nothing unu- sual in the ads, declaring it had run similar ads in 1975 and 1976. The New England Journal of Medicine said it was the first CIA ad it had received. The Journal of the American Medical Association said it also was its first CIA ad. The CIA refused to say how many doctors it now employs or how many it is seeking through new advertising. Former CIA officers said one rea- son the agency wants its own doctors overseas is to keep an eye on the physical and mental health of its offi- cers and agents. One former officer put it this way: "The agency's people are often under great stress in over- seas assignments." Another former CIA official had a more elaborate explanation. He said in recent years the CIA has reduced the numbers of its officers whose cover is employment in American em- ttassies. Nowadays, cover is often a private U.S. firm or institution, which means agency people no longer have access to U.S. military and embassy doctors serving abroad. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP81 M00980R001200070016-5