TALKING POINTS PAPER FOR DDCI

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81M00980R000700010005-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 11, 2004
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 28, 1978
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81M00980R000700010005-9.pdf136.51 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/05/21 : CIA-RDP81'~I100980R000700010005 28 April .l978 o~c #7s- d,z MEMORANDU~MI FOR: Associate Deputy Director for Operations FROM Donald P. Gregg Special Assistant to the DDO for External Oversight SUBJECT Talking Points Paper for DDCI 1. Attached hereto is a Talking Points paper for the DDCI to use with SSCI Staff Director William Miller next week. 2.. Also attached for the DDCIts information is. a Memorandum for the Record dealing with Mr. Miller's perceptions of the Directorate's sensitive collection program.' Donald P. Gregg 25X1 Approved For Release 200 aP t~f1 M00980R000700010005-9 o f ktltr rit- fy] vY4 ^~1 For Release 2004/05/21 : CIA-RDP81 M00980R000700010005-9 Approved TALKING POINTS Background The SSCI's request for a voluminous and detailed report of the Directorate of Operation's clandestine human source collection activities comes at a pivotal time in the Agency's relations with Congress. We have now dealt with the SSCI for about two years J.n a forthcoming and cooperative manner. For the SSCI to,request the great amount of detail, which is embodied in their recommendations on the FY79 NFIP, seems both unjustifiable and unnecessary. If we accede, we will continue to place ourselves in an overly submissive posture toward Congress thereby delaying indefinitely 'the time when we can move into a more collegial relationship with the over- sight committees. At the same time, the Directorate needs to recognize that one of the murky areas in the SSCI's perception of CIA operations is clandestine collection. Our objective should be to help the SSCI become more familiar with and confident in our internal decision-making processes without laying bare our, entire covert collection apparatus. We may well have to go through the same procedure with the HPSCI in the near future. (See attached Memorandum for'the -Record in which Bill Miller articulates the current SSCI perception of the Directorate's clandestine collection operations.). - To respond to the SSCI request, as now formulated, would require us to describe the operating directives, clandestine assets and ongoing costs over the next five years of every Station in the world. To respond in this amount of detail would go far beyond oversight into "micro-management" of CIA by the SSCI. The amount of detail would be so voluminous as to make it impossible for SSCI membership to draw overall conclusions about our clandestine operations. A practical result would be that staffers would focus on specific operations in individual Stations, paving the way for detailed operational questions and second-guessing from those who lack professional qualifications in the intelligence field. tl' DP81 M00980R000700010005-9 L1 b s Approved For Release 2004/05/21 : CIA-RDP81 M00980R000700010005-9 Risk of leaks would 'increase e)lpon.entiaily. What we are willing to do is: a. -describe in detail the objectives, targets and assets of three Stations, one small, one medium and one large, without specifically identifying them; b. present some actual case studies which lay out the ways in which difficult operational decisions are made on clandestine collection operations where both risks and gains are high; c. present, as requested, an evaluation of the contribution of.the DO's clandestine collection-opera- tions to finished intelligence; d. present, as requested, a qualitative, assessment of the value and effectiveness of our clandestine collection operations; e. discuss and explain in the context of current State/CIA relationships, how the Director.ate.fs becoming more and more exclusively focused on collection targets which cannot be approached through overt means-; f. present, as requested, funding prdjections by operating division for the next five years; g. pass to the SSCI the recently completed inves_ti- ?gation of the DO by the House Appropriations Committee which looked exhaustedly into some of these same matters. Approved or a ease : tIA-RDP8i M -