POLAND: THE PAPAL VISIT (U)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
10
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 14, 2001
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 1, 1979
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0.pdf952.41 KB
Body: 
,,Approved-For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 National Security Information Dissemination Control Abbreviations Intelligence Sources and Methods Involved (WNINTEL) Unauthorized Disclosure Subject to Criminal Sanctions NOFORN (NF) Not Releasable t Lalvie. and Ldhuania irda the Sov;e; Union. Names .;ntl hountlary represairfal~n J {~ \ i.~~r~~~ ~~ ,< Gniez o Pazna~i~Iune ~ ? --, ~ '~ ~, ~~. _ WARSAW {~ ~ ~' ~r0$ecie ~~ ~ - -' ` P o ~I a n d ~~ Avport Arrival /une 2 1 ioa Milometers AilStfit.~ ih 'r _ __- ~ Confidential ii Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Confidential Poland: The Papal Visit (U) Key Judgments The visit of Pope John Paul II to his Polish homeland from 2 to 10 Jure- -the first papal visit to a Communist country -promises to be an occasio ~ for a demonstration of Polish religious and national feeling, much of it wish anti- communist overtones. Thi has made Communist authorities-botl: Polish and Soviet-uneasy, but they presumably have concluded that perry fitting the visit is less risky than denying it. At this stage all sides involved n the event-church, state, and ?he Vatican-have a stake in an untroubled visit: ? The Polish regime has opted, after some initial hesitation, to associate itself with the visit, hoping to dilute the visit's inherent anti-Communist content and to garner some popular good will. ? The Polish episcopate hopes the visit will bolster its efforts to secu-e further concessions from the state. ? For the Vatican, the trip is a bold gambit in what is developing into an active papal foreign policy, particularly toward Communist countries. (c) The visit will draw the largest crowds in the history of Communist I"oland. This raises the possibility that, despite the best efforts of all involve~~., an untoward incident could turn pervasive popular discontent into antic egime disturbances. Moscow will be watching for signs of any significant ~ hift in popular Polish attitudes toward the USSR and the Gierek regime, and for any ripple effects elsewhere in Eastern Europe and the USSR. (c;) iii Confidential Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020~~f~lentiat Poland: The Papal Visit (u) The visit is an outgrowth of the Pope's personal interest in celebrations of the 900th anniversary this year of the martyrdom of St. Stanislaw, Poland's patron saint. As Archbishop of Krakow, the Pope (then Cardinal Wojtyla) took a strong hand in propagating the commemoration of Stanislaw, an 11th century bishop of Krakow whose death at the hands of an unpopular king has become identified with Polish patriotism, national unity, and the primacy of religious over secular values. The visit, moreover, will be an emo- tional one for the 59-year-old pontiff, the first Polish cleric ever to head the Roman Catholic Church, and will include a stop at his birthplace in southern Poland near the Czechoslovak border. (u) A joint state-church committee has been hammering out the details of the visit for several months, and these negotiations have continued to the eve of the Pope's arrival. The state authorities, who reportedly antici- pate that upwards of 2 million people may gather at any one time, have been trying to limit the crowds for both political and security reasons. The church shares the latter concern, and the two sides have agreed that to maintain order: ? The visit, at least major portions of it, apparently will be carried live on Polish television, even though this will further erode the state's restrictions on church access to the broadcast media. ? The Pope will appear in four regions of the country, reportedly traveling between cities by helicopter. ? Teams of clergy and uniformed police reportedly will share responsibility for crowd control in order to reduce the danger of an incident precipitated by overzealous police restraints. ? Admissions to some outdoor masses will be limited and sales of alcoholic beverages will be banned from 1 to 3 June. Some local officials are also trying to keep workers at work and students at school during the visit. These efforts probably have done little more than annoy the populace, and are not likely to reduce significantly the size of the crowds. (c) The visit should give new strength to a chura~ that, despite the hostile official environment in wh!ch it functions, is among the most vibrant in the ~~rld. The extraordinary strength of Polish Catholic_~sm is attrib- utable in large part to its strong identificatia; with the culture and history of Poland's highly natio~~listic population. (u) Church leaders in Poland undoubtedly hope i hat the visit, and indeed the whole reign, of a Polish (pope will give new momentum to its efforts to roll bac>f numerous and longstanding restrictions on ct:urch activity. Among the episcopate's goals are: ? More permits for building and renovating c hurches. ? Greater access to the media, including som= new church publications, less censorship of existing publi- cations, and permission to broadcast masses +~n radio and television. ? Increased opportunities for the religious ed~~cation of young people. ? An easing of state restrictions on the churc is social and charitable work. (c) f he Pope may use the visit to tell party leads r Gierek and the Polish episcopate about his preferred choice of a successor to the ailing Stefan Cardinal Wyazynski, who has headed the Polish church for more t?~an 30 years. With the departure of Wojtyla from the Polish hierarchy, the 78-year-old Cardinal has no oi~vious successor. (c) 'The regime's initial obstructionism appears t > have reflected differences within the party leadera~iip over the acceptability of the visit, sensitivity to tltt~ .~ntiregime symbolism of the St. Stanislaw cxlebra- tions, and an unwillingness to let the Vati:,an alone decide the timing of the visit. Several reports claim that party leader Gierek personally gave the.;:o-ahead Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 other end oi~ the spectrum, conservative party, police, and veterans groups, wnsidering the visit an unacceptable boost to the church's position, might attempt to provoke incidents to embarrass both the Pope and regime leaders. Few Poles, however, would wish to spark widespread civil disorder that raised the possibility of Soviet intervention. (c) The new Pope undoubtedly sees his visit as a convenient way to emphasize his keen interest in the condition of the Catholic Church in the USSR and Eastern Europe and his intention to press this interest forward in a vigorous matmer. He has already taken steps to review the status of the church in each East European country and to develop strategies for normalizing relations between the Vatican and the individual regimes. (c) The direct impact of the visit elsewhere in Eastern Europe and in the USSR itself, depending largely on the availability of Western or Polish media coverage, will probably be felt in regions bordering Poland, especially in East Germany and Czechoslovakia. Poland's visa-free travel agreements with both coun- tries raise the possibility of a large influx of religious pilgrims, especially from strongly Catholic Slovakia. Political considerations and the enormous problems of assuring facilities for so many visitors may prompt the Polish or other East European authorities to restrict travel to Poland. (c) Pope John Paul II, left, greeting Unclassified Cardinal Wyszynski shortly after the pontiJ.f's Investiture in Ocdober 1978. for the visit, but even then the regime stubbornly insisted that the visit not coincide with the annual St. Stanislaw celebrations in early May. The church conceded, but then simply extended the celebrations to encompass the period of the Pope's trip. (c) The regime's objectives seem mostly of a damage- limiting nature. Gierek's decision to meet with the Pope seems to reflect his hope of turning the visit into a testimonial of church-state cooperation, projecting a general sense of self-confidence and political strength that the regime in fact lacks. (c) The regime and probably the church hierarchy remain concerned that dissident groups in Poland might try to use the Pope's visit to advance their own causes. At the The Soviet authorities undoubtedly take a much more ideological view of the papal visit than do the Poles. For the Soviets and some other East European regimes, the visit will be an unpalatable demonstration of faith in a radically different set of beliefs by people nominally under Communist rule. The possible travel of high-ranking clergy from elsewhere in the region, moreover, presents additional delicate political prob- lems. The Czechoslovak regime apparently is pressur- ing Cardinal Tomasek, head of the Catholic Church in Czechoslovakia, to stay home; Hungarian church leader Lekai, on the other hand, intends to go to Poland, probably with regime approval. The Soviet, and presumably the Polish, leaderships are evidently not eager for John Paul II to be host to a summit Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Confidential Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Polish primate Stefan Cardinal Wyszynski Unclassified and Polish Communist leader Edward Gierek have met twice to the last six months, largely in connection with the papal visit. meeting of East European churchmen in the heart of the region. (c) The visit is not likely to produce any dramatic rollback of restrictions on church activity in Poland. Indeed, initially there may even be a period of cooler church- state relations. After the visit, Gierek may feel the need to make a show of tougher policies at a time when the episcopate-still basking in an outpouring of religious fervor-might be expecting some immediate gains from the visit. (c) Both sides will probably exercise their customary caution and in the longer term the visit may encourage a continuation of the piecemeal concessions that have characterized Gierek's conciliatory policy toward the church. For a party that officially disdains religion as the "opiate of the masses," the Polish party is singularly dependent on the good will of the chu*ch. The episcopate, for its part, undoubtedly valuesthe influence it has on a weakened regime, but shams the state's fear of civil unrest that could provoke Se~~iet intervention. (e) Another consequence of the visit might be further steps toward diplomatic relations between Warsaw ar~d the Vatican. The two sides agreed to establish "per~ranent working contacts" in 1974. Warsaw quickly staaioned a representative in Rome, but the Vatican did nF~t reciprocate. The Vatican may now be interested in going as far as full diplomatic relations, because of a desire to aid the church during apost-Wyszynslk.i succession period in Poland and a general cone n with church-state relations in Eastern Europe. The 13s~lish regime, which had long favored the presence of r_ papal nuncio in Warsaw to help undercut Wyszynski':, position as Polish primate, presumably is less interested now that the possibilities for thus ~ow~ng discord between the church in Poland and the Vatican arc; substantially reduced. Wyszynski's fears ab?:~ut his role being diluted by the presence of a Vatican representative in Warsaw may lessen now that his former loyal subordinate is the Roman pontiff, and he too may see value to Vatican representation in ~%arsaw for the long-term strength of the church. (c) Relations with Moscow will be the Pope's major concern, however, both because as an East F:ure~pean he realizes the importance of the Soviet attituch to developments in the region and because of the Catholic Church's very poor situation in the USSR. The Pope does hold some cards. The Soviets presumably ~~~ould like to obtain. formal Vatican recognition of the union in 1946 of the Orthodox and Ukrainian Catholic (Uniate) Churches, the regularization of the dixacesan boundaries that presently overlap the Soviet-Polish border, and the general appearance of a coat~er!tive relationship with the Vatican. Moscow will be reluc- tant, however, to allow the church more leeway n the heavily Catholic areas of Latvia, Lithuania, ar~i Belorussia, because religious faith is closely inter- twined with nationalist aspirations and dissident activ- ity. (c) Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Sources of Copyrighted Photographs Page 2: Stern Page 3: Zai Przecis Confidential 4 Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 Approved For Release 2002/01/03 :CIA-RDP80T00942A001100020001-0 rApproved For Release 2002/01703 `. CIA-RDP80T009~42A00'f100020001-0