USSR: THE GAS INDUSTRY THROUGH 1985

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
24
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 19, 2002
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 1, 1978
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6.pdf3.33 MB
Body: 
'1A(W41a9 ioffffi lffff f r(av'ei For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 An Intelligence Assessment Confidential ER 78-10416 July 1978 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 CIA-RDP80T00702A0001000fO 07-Y? 350 25X1 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 CONFIDENTIAL USSR: The Gas Industry Through 1985 Central Intelligence Agency National Foreign Assessment Center Key Judgments The USSR is unquestionably depending_upon natural gas to help carry it past any difficulties caused in the next several years by stagnating or falling oil production. The Soviets are intensifying their efforts to exploit their extremely large gas reserves (referred to by the Soviet press as "blue gold") and have good reason to emphasize the gas industry's rapid development: ? Unlike the Soviet oil industry, the gas industry has been extremely successful in finding new reserves. Almost all of the giant hydrocarbon discoveries announced by the Soviets since the early 1970s have been gas, and proved reserves probably now equal at least 40 years of production at the 1977 level of 346 billion cubic meters (cu m) compared with only about 10 years for oil. ? Despite repeated failure to meet plan goals, the gas industry has grown more than twice as fast as the,oil industry over the past two decades and now provides nearly one-fourth of Soviet fuel supplies. Between now and 1985, gas output will contribute most of the increments to total Soviet fuel production, and by 1985 it could constitute more than one-third of total Soviet fuel output.. Natural gas is already a major industrial fuel in the USSR and the country's fastest growing source of export receipts. Although the Soviet gas industry has the potential to maintain substan- tial production growth through the next decade, several major obstacles may hold down its rate of expansion. ? Most of the country's gas production now occurs in the European USSR and Central Asia, but these regions contain only about 30 percent of total reserves, and new discoveries have not kept pace with output over the past decade. Production from many of these regions' large fields is declining, and may be doing so at a faster pace than we estimated earlier. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 ? Future growth of the gas industry depends on rapid development of the large deposits of northern West Siberia-both to offset declines in other regions' output and to allow for substantial growth. Development of this arctic area is unprecedented in the history of the world's oil and gas industries and poses problems of field development and pipeline and compressor station construction and operation not previously encountered in either the USSR or the West. Even with further imports of Western gas equipment (notably pipe and compressors), the USSR may not avoid a substantial slowing of growth in West Siberian-and thus Soviet-gas output. Moscow appears to have grown more concerned since mid-1977 over the face of West Siberian gas development. ? Articles in the Soviet press complaining of slow or inadequate con- struction of pipeline and gasfield projects have become more frequent and frank. ? Moscow has recently assigned more of the 1976-80 Five-Year Plan budget to oil and gas development in West Siberia and has hurriedly dispatched additional men and equipment to that region. ? Because vital infrastructure in northern Siberia is virtually nonexist- ent, however, even a major stepped-up campaign to open the region's gas deposits probably will produce through 1985 only marginally more gas than that provided without additional efforts. Gas will help ease the impending decline in Soviet oil production. onetheless, it will not solve the country's emerging energy problems. Gas will substitute for oil in several sectors of the economy, but not rapidly or to the extent necessary to prevent potential tight energy supplies. ? Gas by 1985 will become the leading earner of hard currency in trade with the West, but it will probably not equal the receipts currently being obtained by Soviet oil exports. ii CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Key Judgments ............................................ ............................................ Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Gas in Perspective .................................................................................... 1 Tyumen': Pluses and Minuses ................................................................ 4 Tyumen' Development Problems .............................................................. 7 Inadequate Infrastructure .................................................................... 7 Field Preparation .................................................................................. 7 Pipeline and Compressor Station Construction .................................. 8 Development Encounters Unprecedented Problems ............................ 8 Supply of Pipe ........................................................................................ 9 Compressor Shortages .......................................................................... 9 The Role of Gas Domestically and in Foreign Trade ............................ 10 Domestic Consumption .......................................................................... 10 Foreign Trade ...................................................................................... 11 Prospects .................................................................................................... 12 Production Losses ................................................................................ 13 Siberian Bottlenecks .............................................................................. 13 Reliance on the West ............................................................................ 14 Rising Costs .......................................................................................... 14 Stepped-Up Campaign ........................................................................ 15 iii CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Increments to Energy Production Million B/D Oil Equivalent 3.0 M iv Approved For Release 200 ~Nf N i1 -RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 USSR: The Gas Industry Through 1985 25X1 Introduction Soviet natural gas production until recently has drawn much less attention than Soviet pro- duction of oil, which currently constitutes 45 percent of domestic fuel output versus 24 percent for gas and 28 percent for coal. Natural gas, however, is the most dynamic sector of Soviet fuel production. Despite its repeated failure to meet plan goals, the Soviet gas industry has grown rapidly, becoming second only to that of the United States. Its impressive capacity for continued expansion suggests that its importance to both foreign and domestic consumers will eventually approach that of oil. The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the prob- lems and prospects facing the Soviet gas industry for the next few years. Gas in Perspective Soviet natural gas production has ended a boom phase in its development and is entering an era of slower growth. This is occurring, some- what paradoxically, as the Soviets begin exploit- ing their largest gasfields. The concentration of the USSR's major gas reserves in a single, remote region-West Siberia-will increasingly hamper gas extraction now that other large sources of regional growth are gone. Resulting bottlenecks in production will not prevent gas from increasing its importance in total Soviet energy supplies, but they could lead to occasional interruptions. The importance of gas to the Soviet energy balance and to hard-currency trade is steadily increasing. Gas already constitutes 24 percent of Soviet fuel production, against 45 percent for oil. Its export level to the West since 1970 has risen to one-fifth of that for oil (in caloric equivalent). More important to Soviet planners, the growth potential for gas remains significant while oil production will begin its decline by the early 1980s. During 1971-75, gas added about one- half as much energy to Soviet supplies as did oil; during 1976-80, gas will probably add more than oil-2.2 million barrels per day (b/d) oil equiv- alent compared with about 1.7 million b/d. During 1981-85, prospective increases in gas supplies (2.1 million b/d oil equivalent) probably will more than offset declines in oil production (see figure 1). The USSR may have up to 28 trillion cu m in proved, probable, and possible reserves, at least four times as much as equivalent US reserves.' West Siberia's northern Tyumen' Oblast con- tains several of the world's largest known gas deposits, and the trunkline system being built to link them with consumers in the European USSR and farther west is unprecedented in its length and potential throughput capacity. Gas production in 1977 grew by 8 percent compared with 1976 production and was 4 billion ' It is possible that the Soviets have recently revised downward their gas reserve estimate. Although Soviet data released in 1976 and 1977 indicated that reserves of 28 trillion cu in had been reached, recent Soviet statements have failed to give a current reserve estimate and suggest that the figure may be lower, perhaps around 23 trillion cu in. This report, however, will use the estimate of 28 trillion cu in. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 CONFIDENTIAL cu m above planned production, reaching 346 billion cu m~ (33 billion cubic feet per day)-the industry's second consecutive overfulfillment of an annual plan. Output since 1970 has grown at an impressi a 8.3-percent annual rate. Maintain- ing such gr wth, however, will prove to be much more difficult in the future. Growth will likely drop well b low the current 8-percent average annual rate; gas output in 1980 is likely to reach about the middle of the target for 400 billion to 435 billion c m in the 1980 plan. It is unlikely to do better th n reach the bottom of the range of 560 billion to 600 billion cu m projected for 1985. Gas nevertheless will provide by far the largest incr ments of any major fuel in total Soviet ener y production during 1976-85. By 1985 gas could account for approximately 40 percent of total fuel output. It could also replace oil as the leading commodity in Soviet exports by 1985. The impending slowdown in gas production growth stems from two developments of the late 1970s: ? Significant growth potential is now more concentrated in a single region than at any time since the mid-1960s when the Soviet gas industry began to grow rapidly. West Siberia's northern Tyumen' Oblast (see the map) possesses most of the major untapped Soviet reserves feasibly exploitable in the next decade (see table 1). Yet the cost and physical difficulty of developing these depos- its and piping the gas 3,000 to 5,000 kilo- meters (km) for domestic consumption and export poses unprecedented problems for So- viet energy ministries.' ? Simultaneously, combined production from the country's other gas regions will decline. This will force West Siberia to cover increas- ingly large losses in national output before actually making net additions to total gas supply (see figure 2). Trion-West Siberian Tyumen' Oblast Gas Industry' Reserves (A + B + C,)- Production Reserves/ (Billion Cubic Percent of (Billion Cubic Percent of Production Meters) USSR Reserves Meters) USSR Output Ral:io 1960............ 50.2 2.2 0 0 1,1961 ............ 50.2 2.0 0 0 11962 ........... 70.1 2.5 0 0 !1963............ 130.1 4.2 0 0 1964............ 200.3 6.2 0 0 11965........... 300.3 8.4 0 0 1,966........... 400.8 11.2 0.6 0.4 668 1,1967............ 895.8 20.4 5.2 3.3 172 1968............ 4,030.6 42.8 8.2 4.8 492 1969 ............. 4,914.3 40.7 9.1 5.0 540 1970............ 6,834.9 56.5 9.2 4.6 743 1971............ 9,252.3 58.7 9.3 4.4 995 1972 ........... 10,608.7 58.9 11.4 5.1 931 973........... 11,797.4 60.4 15.8 6.7 747 974............ 13,749.5 61.3 21.8 8.4 631 1975............ 15,490.0 63.0 36.8 12.7 421 976............ 17,000.0 61.0 44.0 13.7 386 977............ NA NA 67.9 19.6 NA I Soviet and Western oil and gas reserve concepts differ, and Soviet reserve estimates are nc -eliable. Nonetheless, Soviet A reserves plus some portion of adjacent B reserves correspond t( I proved reserves" category. The remainder of B reserves and some fraction of the C, reserves fall JS "Drobable" classification. Most of the remainder of the C. reserves fqll into the IN "noq.qib1P- i Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 CONFIDENTIAL lone ro LC lion O atura as rs sA: - -rla Oblast ` trr Asiaa aucass 576486 7-78 CONFIDENTIAL 3 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 CONFIDENTI~L i gas pr duct(on peaked in 1977 and will decline or the first time in 1978 (see table 2). Extraction rates are falling at major, but old, fields of the Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and the Nor h Caucasus, and recent information indicate that the decline may be accelerat- ing faster than we had previously expected. Certainly by the early 1980s these regions will constitute a severe drag on overall gas industry growth. Moreover, output may have peaked or Central Asia, until last year the leading source of production growth. By 1980, extraction may begin declining in the region's prolific Turkmen SSR and in the Komi A SR, also a source of recent growth.' Tyumen': Pluses and Minuses The large gas deposits of northern Tyumen' present both opportunities and serious challenges to the Soviet gas industry. More than 80 percent of the region's reserves of 17 trillion to 19 trillion cu m are inl eight large fields (Urengoy, Yam- burg, Zapol'arny, Medvezh'ye, Kharsavei, Bo- vanenko, S Imakov, and Neitinsk), which will facilitate de loyment of industry resources to- ward both fi Id development and construction of ' For a detail discussion of the decline in output from older producing region, see USSR: Development of the Gas Industry, op. cit. USSR: GroLvth in West Siberian Gas Production Billion Cubic Meters pipelines linking those fields. However, all of those deposits straddle the Arctic Circle and are under permafrost many tens of meters thick. Of greater concern to Soviet planners, the fields are great distances from the major industrial and urban consuming centers in the European USSR, necessitating construction of transmis- sion pipelines thousands of kilometers long. Dur- ing this five-year plan alone, the USSR plans to add 35,400 km of large-diameter gas transmis- sion lines and great numbers of compressors, mainly to link these reserves with the consuming regions in the European 1USSR.4 Only the United States has ever added more major gas trunkline during any five-year period. The magnitude of West Siberia's potential output and its prospective problems has been reflected in the gas industry's rapidly growing investment in the region. Development of the huge Medvezh'ye deposit in the early and mid- 1970s increased the northern Tyumen' share of annual industry investment to well over 30 per- cent (see table 3). Medvezh'ye is now the Sovi- ets' largest operating gasfield and the only sig- nificant northern Tyumen' deposit fully developed so far. Its jump in output from 44 billion cu m in 1976 to over 66 billion in 1977 accounted for almost all gas industry growth last year. The field's gas has been transported to the European USSR through the Nadym-Punga- Nizhny Tagil-Gor'kiy (now the Urengoy-Cen- ter) pipeline and apparently, in the past two `Together with planned additions of 18,000 km of large-diame- ter oil pipelines, this represents the equivalent of one Alaska pipeline every six weeks-much of it under environmental condi- tions even more severe than those encountered on the Prudhoe-to- Valdez route. 1970.......... 2 188.7 0.1 16.7 1971.......... 3 203.1 0.1 14.4 Annual Capital Investment in Northern Region Gas 1972.......... 11 .4 210.0 2.1 6.9 Projects as Percent of Total Gas Industry Investment' 1973.......... 1$ .8 220.5 4.4 10.5 1974.......... 238.8 6.0 18.3 1975.......... 252.5 15.0 13.7 1976.......... 276.6 7.2 24.1 1977' ...... 61 .9 278.1 23.9 1.5 19782 ...... 90 .0 271.0 31.1 -7.1 ' Not all projects accounted for here strictly involved Tyumen' Oblast gas. However, most investment, particularly in the later years ' Estimated. 11 shown, was most likely tied to that region's gas industry. Source: ' Plan Ekonomika gazovoy promyshlennostt, no. 8 (1977), p. 36. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 years, through a linkup with the Northern Lights trunkline. Tyumen' gas development during 1976-80 will prove much more expensive than in 1971-75. In pouring roughly 15 billion rubles-80 percent of the Ministry of the Gas Industry total-into the region in that period (equal to about 4 percent of total industry investment for that period), Mos- cow plans to raise West Siberian output in 1980 to 155 billion cu m. 5 That increase would pro- vide more than 80 percent of the gas industry's growth while raising the northern Tyumen' share of Soviet gas output to well over one-third. The key to growth in the next few years is the Urengoy deposit, which with 5 trillion cu m of reserves (equal to total US gas reserves in the 48 conterminous states) is probably the world's larg- est gasfield. The Soviets apparently are planning to hike Urengoy's output rapidly from 15 billion cu m in 1978, when it will come on stream, to 58 billion to 60 billion cu m in 1980. The nearby Vyngapur deposit also is being drilled to produce almost 5 billion cu m in 1978 and up to 15 billion in 1980. Development of the Komso- mol'sk, Yubilenoy, and Gubkin fields has also begun. Facilities to process up to 16 billion cu m of associated gas from Samotlor and other oil- fields in southern Tyumen' are also planned to reach full capacity in 1980. More than 500 extraction gas wells are sched- uled for drilling during 1976-80-the largest number of gas wells ever completed in any one Soviet region during a five-year plan. Included are 229 wells at Urengoy and 148 additional wells at Medvezh'ye, which is to peak at approxi- mately 65 billion cu m this year. Three pipeline systems will move 139-billion- cu m output in northern Tyumen' to Soviet and European consumers (see the map). Medvezh'ye and Urengoy gas will be handled by an expanded Northern Lights system running to the western Soviet border and by the Urengoy-Center sys- tem, also with expanded capacity. Construction S Northern Tyumen' Oblast would produce 139 billion cu m, while associated gas from the southern Tyumen' oil region would account for the remainder. has begun of a third system (Urengoy-Vyngapur- Chelyabinsk) which will move a limited amount of gas from Urengoy and the smaller neighboring fields by the decade's end. A pipeline moving associated gas to the Kuzbass region should reach full capacity by 1980. In all, the Soviets plan to install 9,500 km of large-diameter pipet-much of it 1,420-mm (56-inch)-and more than 60 compressor stations, each with several turbine units. The Tyumen' trunkline system would thus become the largest single pipeline system in the world. This system will be several times greater than the pro- posed $10 billion US-Canadian gas pipeline from the North Slope to western markets. Development plans beyond 1980 are not defi- nite. During 1981-85, however, Moscow will certainly try to bring Urengoy to its possible peak capacity of 100 billion cu m. The target date is 1982-83, and could require at least another 250 wells. The Soviet press has recently suggested the possibility of raising Urengoy's peak output to more than 200 billion cu m. No firm plans to achieve such an unprecedented production level, however, have been announced. Full development of Vyngapur, Gubkin, Komso- mol'sk, and Yubilyenoy probably is also planned. Uncertain are the plans for other giant Tyumen' fields. The leading candidates for 1981-85 devel- opment would seem to be Zapolyarny and Yam- burg. Although confirmatory step-out drilling' is under way at both deposits, the Gas Ministry reportedly may be undecided as to whether or how extensively the two should be developed in the early 1980s. A possible debate over whether to increase Urengoy's production substantially above 100 billion cu m could be contributing to the uncertainty, as could the Gas Ministry's competition with the Oil Ministry for financial resources for the 1981-85 five-year plan period. Given a Soviet desire for continued, significant growth in gas output, however, both deposits probably will experience partial development. 6 In this paper, large-diameter pipe includes diameters of 1,020 millimeters (mm) and larger. The Soviet definition often includes pipe of 530-mm diameter and larger. The largest gas pipe currently in widespread world use is 1,420-mm. ' Drilling intended to gain further knowledge of a deposit's size. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 CONFIDENTIAL West Siberian: Gas Fields and Gas Pipelines ? Na ural gag field Pipeline in operation - - Pipeline planned or under construction 0; Kilos n te,p 300 ' Kharsavey 7 Neitinsk Semakov Yamburg~ Novy, ' ,Zapolyarny Urengoy Yubilroy Gubkin 576506 6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 This in turn will require new trunklines connect- ing the new fields with existing pipeline sys- tems-Zapolyarny linking up with the Urengoy- Chelyabinsk system and Yamburg with the Urengoy-Nadym trunkline. production. As development spreads to other deposits in the early 1980s, logistics problems undoubtedly will increase. Field Preparation Tyumen' Development Problems West Siberia's massive gas reserves present massive exploitation problems. The location of the giant gasfields in West Siberia has posed significant difficulties for almost every phase of the gas industry's development. Although the Medvezh'ye field's development has provided valuable experience for work on other deposits, it also suggests that several problems will persist well into the 1980s. Inadequate Infrastructure Northern Tyumen' lacks an efficient network of all-weather roads and railways to link the region to support industries. It also requires production support facilities-such as interfield and intrafield roads, supply depots, airfields, repair facilities, communications, and power sup- ply-all of which must be built from scratch. The same is true for housing and basic social services for the growing labor force. In Med- vezh'ye's development, investment in infrastruc- ture and wages for a large number of support personnel has cost over 1 billion rubles. Until adequate surface transport systems are built, moreover, materials supply will continue to rely heavily on air transport, which added 50 percent to Medvezh'ye's development cost. Progress on building infrastructure has proved slow. Construction of railways and hard-surface roads has lagged substantially behind plan dur- ing the past five years and probably will do likewise during 1976-80. Tyumen' will remain unable to supply most of its own construction materials! Such support industries will continue to lag because of poor organization. Development priorities are not closely coordinated among the 20 agencies involved in West Siberian oil and gas Northern Tyumen' plants supply only 50 percent of reinforced concrete, 15 percent of crushed rock, 25 percent of gravel, and 20 percent of wood products needed for gas industry installations. Northern Tyumen' gas deposits do not yet pose the problem of great depths that have raised drilling costs elsewhere in the USSR. Nonethe- less, field development will prove difficult. Be- sides the delays caused by supply and infrastruc- ture shortcomings, harsh arctic conditions interrupt drilling and construction for several months each year. The Soviets apparently are trying to reduce winter-idle-time in Urengoy's development, but the weather is probably con- tinuing to slow operations. Thick permafrost hampers drilling and extraction; the melting and refreezing of permafrost around wells has fre- quently caused collapse of well casings and se- vere wellhead settlement, halting drilling and production. Improved casing materials, drill pipe, drilling fluid, and well refrigeration techniques are required. Field preparation should be speeded by the Soviets' recent adoption of cluster drilling- generally the sinking of four wells from one platform. The Soviets publicly claim no signifi- cant problems. However, they have encountered severe difficulties in drilling through permafrost with their standard turbodrill and are unable to sink directional wells-a more efficient extrac- tion method-because of the danger of melting the permafrost. These problems may persist into the 1980s, when the Soviets develop deposits further north under even thicker permafrost. Gas processing will also challenge Soviet tech- nology into the next decade. Drilling of large- diameter wells9 will enable greater exploitation of the giant fields' initially high-pressure reserves. Pressure at many fields will drop within a few years after production begins, however, necessi- tating additional compressor stations both at the field and along the pipeline. Condensate, hy- ' Currently, this category in the Soviet gas industry includes wells of 146- to 168-mm diameters. The Soviets are also consider- ing a large number of wells of 219- to 273-mm diameters. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 CONFIDENTIAL drates,10 an( extraction t high-capacit Soviet plant and automa mum efficie. use. Until gaslines ma; partly by cc Pipeline a ble-plagued pipeline tra were discov massive net lines was b 75, 31,000 installation Soviet gas 135,000 km production, greater dist by gas in 19 917 km in 1 I water seepage will become major problems in a few years, requiring y processing facilities. Yet most are many years behind the West's, ted processing units ensuring maxi- ncy are not likely to find widespread processing is improved, Tyumen' y occasionally suffer breaks caused rrosive impurities in the gas." id Compressor Station Construction est, most ambitious, and most trou- sector of the Soviet gas industry is risport. As substantial gas deposits ;red outside the Urals-Volga region, ral Asia and then in West Siberia, a work of cross-country transmission wilt to link the remote fields with d foreign consumers. During 1971- km of trunklines were laid. The of an additional 35,400 km by ly in West Siberia-will expand the trunkline network to more than With the growth of West Siberian gas is moving over increasingly nces. The average distance traveled 15 was 1,294 km compared with only 970. The average may rise to 1,900 Development Encounters Unprecedented Problems Several methods of pipeline construction have been tried experimentally over the last dozen years with varying degrees of success: elevated pipelines have been known to fall off their sup- ports, apparently because of wind-induced vibra- tion and thermal expansion. In some cases, the supports themselves have failed because of ther- mal erosion of the permafrost. Berm construc- tion " Z has its limitations because sand rather than gravel (which would have to be flown in) must be used for the berm. The pipeline berm is sometimes eroded by wind and water, leaving the pipe unrestrained and exposed to extreme winter temperatures, and metal failure usually results. The most successful approach has involved ditch- buried construction. However, heat from the gas within the pipe and thermal radiation causes the permafrost to thaw to depths of 6 meters. Pipe settlement results, producing stresses on the pipe. The Urengoy-Medvezh'ye line will be the first major trunk system crossing continuous perma- frost and will probably require the use of a chilled gasline to prevent serious thermokarst damage.13 The USSR has no experience with chilled gasline construction and has delayed building the Urengoy-Medvezh'ye line for over a year in order to study US techniques used in the Alyeska oil pipeline and the planned arctic: gas pipeline. Chilled gas pipelines, though most de- sirable from a construction standpoint, have large power requirements for the refrigeration equipment. The tundra presents even larger construction problems than does the permafrost. Whereas only about 130 km of permafrost construction is planned by 1980, more than 20,000 km of swamp construction must be carried out.14 Under such km by 19801. The Sovi~ extensively i country to it a major seal is have used large-diameter pipes luring the 1970s, becoming the first troduce 1,420-mm (56-inch) pipe on ;. Average pipeline diameter of long- distance lines increased from 815 mm in 1970 to 1,012 mm in 1975. By 1980 this figure may reach 1,082 mm. Compressor power on most lines is inadequate, holding down pipeline throughput to suboptimum levels. The Soviets must rely o imports of Western pipe and com- pressors to come even close to meeting their pipeline construction goals. I ? Hydrates re~ ult from the cooling of warm gas as it flows to the surface. The condensation causes water vapors to collect at the top of the well and d wn hole near perforations in the well casing. The water freezes, trapping the gas in hydrate form. The hydrates tend to plug the flow apertures in both areas, and at low surface temperatures may cause valves to stick or split. 11 Soviet gas rocessing is discussed in more detail in USSR: Development of he Gas Industry, op. cit., appendix D. " A pipeline berm is an aboveground structure usually formed by a gravel pad atop which the pipe is layed. An earthen mound then covers the pipe. The gravel base provides protection against heaving action caused by repeated freezing and thawing of the ground. The earth covering insulates the pipe from destructive effects of the weather. "Thermokarst is the formation of irregular land surfaces in a permafrost region caused by a melting of ground ice. In northern Siberia the soil contains 50 to 70 percent ice by volume and thermokarst depressions up to 40 meters deep have been noted. " Tundra is a treeless plain characteristic of arctic and subarctic regions, usually with a marshy surface, underlain by a dark mucky soil and permafrost. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 conditions, most pipeline construction can be done only in the winter on frozen ground, the only time access roads and construction pads can be built. Depending on the method of construc- tion, access roads can cost anywhere from 500,000 to 1 million rubles per kilometer. Swamp construction also requires numerous screw anchors and saddle weights to secure the pipeline to the mineral soil below. Besides construction problems there are often unexplained structural failures in the pipe itself. One of the 1,420-mm lines between Nadym and Punga experiences an average of 10 breaks a year. Typically, the pipe splits open at the top over a distance of 50 to 70 meters. In other instances, ruptures 600 to 700 meters long have occurred. Some failures can apparently be traced to poor welds, laxity of inspection work, and imperfections in the pipe itself; others to inad- equate pipeline maintenance and improper gas treatment processes. Failure to remove most of the sulphur and moisture content of the natural gas at the field before pipelining it can cause severe internal corrosion and a weakening of the pipe walls. Supply of Pipe The USSR is the world's largest producer of large-diameter steel pipe. Nonetheless, it is un- able to manufacture all the large-diameter, high- quality pipe it needs for its gas and oil pipelines and depends heavily on imports from West Ger- many, Italy, France, and Japan. The Soviets during 1971-75 may have produced about 8 million metric tons of large-diameter welded pipe. Total Soviet demand for such pipe, how- ever, was approximately 14 million tons, requir- ing imports of almost 6 million tons. During 1976-80, planned construction of 54,000 km of new oil and gas pipelines will require roughly 17 million tons of large-diameter pipe. Known Soviet purchases and orders indicate that imports in 1976-80 will reach 8 million to 10 million tons. That in turn suggests that Soviet domestic manu- facture will not increase much above its 1971-75 level. Goals for gas pipeline construction in 1981-85 may not prove as ambitious as the current five- year plan's. The major systems linking Tyumen' gasfields and the European USSR have been started in this plan period. Moreover, the de- mand for additional oil trunklines will decline. However, the need to lay additional lines on all gas pipeline systems-plus the necessity of link- ing them with the Zapolyarny and Yamburg fields if those two deposits begin development in that period-will probably still require much more pipe than the Soviets can produce. Two new pipe mills" are to be added to the existing five. Their combined output could increase large- diameter pipe manufacture by 2 million tons. Neither plant will reach full capacity, however, until the early 1980s. Another plant-a turnkey facility with a capacity of 250,000 to 300,000 tons-is still under negotiation with West Ger- man, French, and Japanese firms. It, too, would not begin peak operation until well after 1980. Existing plants will probably increase their out- put of large-diameter pipe in the next few years, but not substantially. Thus even though Soviet demand for large-diameter pipe may fall in 1981-85 by several million tons, a few million tons will probably have to be imported to cover pipe requirements for the period. Most imports would probably be made through gas-for-pipe compensation agreements, in which West Euro- pean countries receive gas shipments over a fixed period of years in exchange for selling the Soviets large-diameter pipe on credit. Compressor Shortages The major problem presently facing the gas industry is an inability to provide the compressor capacity necessary for economical pipeline opera- tion. Only 50 to 70 percent of the compressor stations planned for installation are actually being commissioned. The current five-year plan calls for 60 new stations per year, whereas only 40 to 45 are being built. Because of this, Soviet gas pipelines often operate at 50 percent of design capacity. The fault lies primarily with the machine building sector, which is responsible for turbine and compressor production, and with the 15 A plant to manufacture roughly 1 million tons of pipe of up to 1,220 mm is being built at Vyksa in Gor'kiy Oblast. A second plant being constructed in West Siberia will produce 1,420-mm pipe and will have a capacity of I million tons. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 CONFIDENTIAL associations the lines." Soviet ga: 10 to 15 yea aircraft gas 1 built in 19' compressor ( use of aircra 1959. The n pressor units um-capacity The first 10 and, by 197: tion. Severe GTK16, GT been built b' Because it ficient, the obtain many the last fou more than compressors nearly 4,000 158 compres tracts since( firms totale( cember 197 Canadian cc ploying Avo Urengoy-Chi Of possibl: chases are stations usin engines such GE LM-25( aircraft. Su( power of fii responsible for installing them on pipeline compressor technology is rs behind that of the West. The first turbine compressor in the USSR was 74 at the Sumy plant for heavy ;onstruction. In the West, industrial ft gas turbines took place as early as iajority of Soviet gas pipeline com- being produced are small- to medi- units of 4 to 6 megawatts (MW): -MW unit was introduced in 1972 5, only 88 such units were in opera- Ll larger compressor models-the K25, GTK50, and GTK100-have at are only in the testing stage. s own manufacturing ability is insuf- USSR has come to the West to of its gas pipeline compressors. In r years the Soviets have imported -1.5 billion worth of high-capacity from the West with a total power of MW. The largest purchase involved sors for the Orenburg pipeline. Con- I with West German and Italian I more than $700 million. In De- the USSR purchased from a UK- ,nsortium 42 compressor units em- n Rolls Royce jet engines for the -lyabinsk pipeline. y greater significance than past pur- ngoing negotiations for compressor g second-generation, lightweight jet as the Rolls-Royce RB-211 and the )0, developed for wide-bodied jet :h engines offer almost double the st-generation engines and provide fuel savings Of 15 to 20 percent (per horsepower per hour) with an increase of only 50 percent in initial cost. gines relate involve only Current negotiations for these en- to a pilot project and probably a few compressors. However, if the decided to eventually use this de- sign on a 1 significant. / "Most gas a Construction of ( rge. scale, fuel savings could be lthough pipeline applications of ad- d oil pipelines are built by the Ministry for it and' Gas Industry Enterprises. vanced second-generation gas turbines such as the RB-211 are relatively new-they were first installed in Canada in 1975--such uses are likely to prove successful. In that event, this technology could assist the USSR in further developing its gas pipeline trunk network in order to meet its growing demands for piping natural gas in the 1980s. The Role of Gas Domestically and in Foreiign Trade Domestic Consumption The share of natural gas in the Soviet energy balance may approach or exceed that of crude oil in caloric terms by 1985." Gas by that time, however, will only substitute for oil domestically in some uses. Most opportunities for easy substi- tution of gas for oil have already been exploited. Additional gas production will go for use in industrial boilers and to industrial sectors which are already large gas consumers and in which gas is being substituted for fuels other than oil. Gas consumption will continue to increase in the chemical and metallurgical industries, where it has been replacing coal and coke. Household use will also increase but will not involve gas-for-oil substitution, because oil has not generally been used directly for heating purposes. Significant substitution of gas for oil before 1985 probably will occur in electric power gen- eration, where oil-burning thermal power plants can switch more readily to gas than to coal,. No such shift is apparently planned for 1976-80, since the Soviets actually intend to reduce the share of gas in total thermal power plant fuel consumption during this period. Several oil-burn- ing plants in the European USSR could make the switch in the 1980s if a domestic oil shortage required it. However, gas storage capacity near these plants would have to undergo substantial expansion to avoid winter gas supply shortages.`$ " Oil production in 1985 probably will be about 8 million to 10 million b/d. Output of natural gas probably will be 560 billion to 600 billion cu m, equivalent to about 9.4 million to 10.1 million b/d of oil. " Development of Soviet gas storage capacity is outlined. in USSR: Development of the Gas Industry, op. cit., appendix E. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Additional industrial sectors can also switch to greater gas consumption in the 1980s. Given declining Soviet oil output and a Soviet intent to minimize reliance on foreign energy sources, Moscow undoubtedly will attempt to use gas more widely through more efficient gas utiliza- tion by existing gas consumers and conversion of other industries to gas-burning power sources. The Soviets currently show no signs of initiat- ing the large-scale conversion campaign that would be required. The nature of significant substitution within individual industrial sectors is not clear, and further research is needed to determine the amount of gas-for-oil substitution possible for each industry within a period of five or 10 years. If the historically long Soviet lead- times characterize such an effort, a widespread shift to gas could be delayed until the late 1980s. What is unknown is the budget priorities that the Soviets would be willing to assign to a major conversion effort and the technical difficulties that they would face. Foreign Trade Natural gas eventually will vie with oil as the Soviets' chief foreign exchange earner. Total gas exports will increase from 26 billion cu in in 1976 to roughly 78 billion in 1985 (see table 4). Net exports-assuming moderate increases in Soviet gas imports from Iran and Afghanistan-will rise in that period from 14 billion cu in to 47 billion. In particular, rising gas exports to West- ern Europe-and constraints on Soviet oil pro- duction and exports-should permit gas export earnings to equal and surpass hard-currency receipts from exports of oil. Under gas trade contracts already signed-most of them ex- changing gas for large-diameter pipe and ancil- lary equipment on credit-Soviet gas exports to Western Europe19 should rise from 12.4 billion cu in in 1976 to 25 billion cu m in 1980. By 1985, exports will probably increase to 35 billion cu in. " West Germany, France, Austria, and Italy. Exports also go to Finland, for which hard currency is not paid. USSR: Projected Trade in Natural Gas,' by Country Exports ........................................ 25.8 Eastern Europe ...................... 13.4 Bulgaria .............................. 2.2 Czechoslovakia .................. 4.3 East Germany .................... 3.4 Hungary .............................. 1.0 Poland ................................ 2.5 Romania .............................. 0 Yugoslavia .......................... 0 Western Europe .................... 12.4 Austria .................................. 2.8 Finland .............................. 0.9 France ................................ 1.0 Italy .................................... 3.7 West Germany .................. 4.0 Imports ...................................... 11.8 Afghanistan ........................ 2.5 Iran ...................................... 9.3 Net Trade ................................ 14.0 32.7 37.3 45.3 55.5 196.6 77.8 16.0 17.5 24.0 30.6 101.5 43.1 3.5 4.0 5.0 6.3 21.0 8.5 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.3 25.6 10.0 4.0 4.0 5.5 6.5 23.4 7.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 4.0 9.5 5.4 3.0 3.5 4.5 6.0 19.5 8.1 0 0 1.0 1.5 2.5 2.1 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 16.7 19.8 21.3 24.9 95.1 34.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 14.0 4.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.4 5.2 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 4.7 11.2 7.7 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 31.2 7.0 5.0 7.0 8.5 9.0 33.5 15.0 12.9 12.9 13.0 14.6 65.2 31.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 4.0 15.3 4.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.6 49.9 27.0 19.8 24.4 32.3 40.9 131.4 46.8 ' Actual for 1976. Source: Vneshnyaya torgovipa SSSR 1976, Moscow (1977). Trade estimates for the years 1977-80 and 1985 are based on (a) known Soviet - West Europe trade agreements; (b) for Eastern Europe, the trade arrangement under Orenburg pipeline agreement and assumed annual increments in gas deliveries to certain CEMA customers; (c) scheduled increases in imports from Iran under the "trilateral switch" deal and assumed slight increases in imports from Afghanistan. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 CONFIDENTIIAL Much of the 1981-85 jump will involve exports of Iranian gas to West Germany, France, and Austria via the Soviet Union .2' The Soviet share of Western Europe's total gas supply by 1985 will probab y not exceed 12 percent. Even if g owth in gas production slows toward the mid-19 Os, the Soviets are likely to honor existing ha d-currency contracts. Although they may not al ays fulfill annual commitments- ey will strive to supply u imately all the gas ca led for over the contract pe iod. Foreign currency earnings from gas of $1 1 illion in 1980 (in 1977 prices) will surpass neit er the $4.5 billion obtained in 1976 from exports of oil nor_the potential earnings of $2.7 billion from oil exports in 1980. By 1985, however, gas will have emerged as the leading foreign exchange earner, with gross hard curren- cy receipts f $2 billion (in 1977 prices), while the Soviets may have become net importers of oil. LNG exports could also provide substantial revenues for Soviet gas. The proposed LNG project mos likely to produce exports is a joint Soviet-US-Japanese venture to bring East Siberi- an gas from the Vilyuy field to the Soviet Pacific coast for li uefaction. No LNG exports, how- ever, are lik ly before the very late 1980s at the earliest, and ciently lark States and gas to Sovie very least, g of the pure rising costs ogy and equ tion in the Gas expo will remain tuting rougl .Signed in transmitting of gas-poor Soviet their own Siberil will import 17 billion, keeping will receive 3.6 European consol into effect in sty begin later. will only be forthcoming if a suffi- e market develops in the United Japan. Meanwhile the importance of t trade will prove substantial. At the as will provide an increasing portion hasing power needed to cover the If Soviet imports of Western technol- ipment that expansion of gas produc- 1980s will require. ts to Eastern Europe through 1985 arger than those to the West, consti- lly 55 percent of total gas exports in 1975, the "trilateral switch" deal will entail the as from Iran's Kangan field to the increasingly Caucasus. The Soviets in turn will export gas from n and Urals fields to Western Europe. The Soviets )illion cu m annually from Iran and reexport 15 2 billion cu in as a "transit fee." Czechoslovakia billion cu m of the reexported gas, the West -tium taking 11.4 billion. The agreement is to go ages, beginning in 1981, although it probably will that period. By 1980 the USSR should be sup- plying almost 100 percent of Eastern, Europe's gas imports. Soviet shipments to CEMA lnem- bers 21 will rise from 13 billion cu m in 1976 to 31 billion in 1980 and to about 41 billion cu ni in 1985. Much of the increase through the early 1980s will come from gas transmitted via the Orenburg pipeline," which should begin sending some gas in early 1979. How much the Soviets will actually export to Eastern Europe by the mid-1980s is uncertain. With CEMA still heav- ily dependent on Soviet energy supplies, Moscow may significantly increase gas shipments if So- viet ability to export oil declines. The Soviets have recently indicated that such an action is a distinct possibility. In that case, the Soviets may avoid agreements with Western Europe for hard currency gas deliveries additional to those al- ready contracted for. Moscow would hestitate to do this because its ability to import large-diame- ter pipe via gas-for-pipe compensation deals would be reduced. Soviet flexibility in raising gas exports beyond 1980 to both Eastern and West- ern Europe will thus depend on how rap idly output is increased. Prospects Soviet natural gas production will increase substantially through 1985. The 1980 plan goal of 435 billion cu m is not likely to be met, but 1985 output should reach 560 billion to 600 billion cu m, an annual growth rate during 1981- 851 of roughly 6.0 to 7.5 percent (see table 5). However, if certain difficulties facing the gas industry are not reduced within the next few years, not even West Siberia's large gas reserves 21 The Council for Mutual Economic Assistance. Members receiving Soviet gas are Bulgaria, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Yugoslavia, not a CEMA mem- ber, may begin receiving gas shipment:; after 1980. ]2 The Orenburg pipeline is a joint CEMA project for construc- tion of a 2,750-km trunkline from the Orenburg field, in the Urals, to the Czechoslovak border. Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Ger- many, Hungary, Poland, and Romania were to contribute men or capital to the project, in return for 2.8 billion cu m annually to each (1.5 billion cu m to Romania). Most CEMA members have fallen behind on their commitments of men, and Soviet crews have wound up building most of the line. Although the line itself may be completed slightly beyond the late-1978 deadline, a slow buildup of compressor capacity on the line could delay full deliveries of gas to the CEMA recipients. Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Projected' Gas Production Billion Cubic Meters Average Annual Percent Growth 1975 ................ 289 1980 ................ 415-420 7.5-7.81 1985 ................ 560-600 5.9-7.79 1976-85 ........ 6.8-7.61 ' CIA projections. Five-year period. 8 Ten-year period. will be able to guarantee constant production growth beyond 1985. The Soviets themselves, with unusual frankness, recently suggested that gas output might even level off "sometime" in the 1980s.23 Two basic problems underlie that concern: (a) rapidly falling production at older gasfields and (b) persistent bottlenecks-par- ticularly pipeline construction and operation- hindering expansion of Siberian gas output. Gas production at older fields in the European USSR and in Central Asia may be falling much more quickly than anticipated. Moscow has planned for a certain loss in output from these fields during 1976-80 while investing heavily since 1970 to minimize that loss. North Cauca- sus gas production began its decline in the 1960s; the more important producing regions of the Uzbek SSR and the Ukraine began a slow downturn in the early 1970s. The intensive and sometimes wasteful exploitation methods prac- ticed to achieve rapid growth in the late 1960s may have led to a dramatic fall-off in capacity at most major Ukrainian and Uzbek fields. The giant deposits of Shebelinka (Ukraine) and Gazli (Uzbek) are falling sharply, and no significant deposits have been found to replace them.24 An unprecedented Soviet failure during 1977 to report regional gas production figures-com- bined with recent Soviet statements-suggests that output in the Ukraine and Uzbek is falling faster than planned. A precise projection of the amount of output loss is difficult. An aggregate Ukrainian gas production plan for 1976-80, how- ever, indirectly indicated that output there could drop to roughly 50 billion cu m by 1980 rather than the 59 billion cu m earlier planned." Lagging pipeline and compressor station con- struction probably will prevent Tyumen' gas production from fulfilling its 1980 plan of 155 billion cu m. That problem, plus difficulties in developing giant gasfields located above the Arc- tic Circle, will also limit growth during the 1980s. Inadequate compressor capacity on the three trunklines scheduled to move gas from northern Tyumen' to the European USSR will prove a major constraint on growth through 1980. Medvezh'ye, Urengoy, and smaller neigh- boring fields probably will reach their planned aggregate capacity of 139 billion cu m by 1980. 26 Moreover, the three pipeline systems-Urengoy- Center, Northern Lights, and perhaps the first two lines of Urengoy-Chelyabinsk-are likely to have been laid by that time. However, Soviet delays in negotiating imports of Western tur- Z' A 1976-80 aggregate production goal for the Ukraine of 265 billion cu m (Neftyanaya i gazovaya promyshlennost' no.l (Janu- ary-March 1977), p. 2) suggested an annual average output of 53 billion cu m for the period. Since Ukrainian production in 1976, 1977, and perhaps 1978 and 1979 will be higher than that, 1980 output should be considerably lower than 53 billion. " The remainder of the 155 billion cu m planned for Tyumen' Oblast will come primarily from associated gas production at the region's major oilfields. That output will move southward via the Nizhnevartovsk-Kuzbass line, to be completed in late 1978 or early 1979, which should reach full capacity by 1980. 25X1 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 CONFIDENTIAL bines and compressors, long leadtimes for those units' manufacture and delivery, and slow Soviet installation ~f the units will allow perhaps only 120 billion to 125 billion cu m to be moved-15 billion to 20 billion cu in below plan. Serious pipeline failures, such as pipe settlement into permafrost i nd pipe ruptures, could also easily prevent Tyuoen' fields from meeting their goals. The Soviets I themselves have indicated concern with these problems by having long retained the range of 40: billion to 435 billion cu m in the 1980 plan, 4my recently setting a firm goal of 435 billion u m. Reliance o the West Soviet gas production will remain dependent on imports of Western equipment well into the next decade. Both large-diameter pipe and com- pressors will continue to be produced in insuffi- cient quanti~y and quality to meet the gas indus- try's needs. The Soviets will attempt to increase their manuf cture of those two vital inputs, as well as of other pipeline and field-related equip- ment. Howe er, the necessity of developing new and even more remote Siberian deposits will overtax Sovi t industrial and construction capac- ity, particularly since the oil industry will also claim many of those same resources. Should Moscow try I to mount a crash campaign to develop seve al giant gas deposits simultaneous- ly, reliance n Western equipment will further increase. ~ Besides pig a and compressors, the Soviets can use assistan a in several areas. Gas Ministry officials have admitted weaknesses in many phases of d filling in permafrost, including pre- vention of melting permafrost, cementing of wells, use of special packer fluid and drilling fluid, use o improved drill pipe and bits, and overall well design. They have also had problems in determining the optimal spacing of production wells, drilling pads, and related support bases and in dec ding the optimal arrangement of gathering lines and gas processing installations- particularly facilities to cool gas before transmis- sion by tru kline. Most Soviet gas-processing plants and ripeline testing techniques are years behind the West. Leakages in production well tubing is emerging as a widespread problem, and the Ministry is looking to the West for improved tubing products. Many of the above problems may require Western technical assistance as well as equipment imports. The ability of Western assistance to signifi- cantly increase growth of Tyumen' gas produc- tion is severely constrained. Although the West's capacity to supply pipe, turbines, and other equipment should pose no problem, Moscow's hard currency reserves may prove inadequate to purchase all needed items. Pipe and related imports for 1976-80 have apparently been ob- tained with few difficulties. As Soviet oil ex- ports-and oil foreign exchange earnings--de- cline in the early 1980s, however, natural gas exports will probably not cover the entire revenue loss. Consequently more of the hard currency earnings of gas may go toward other types of imports. If the oil industry maintains substantial equipment imports, foreign exchange available for gas-related purchases will. be further limited. In this situation, a shortage of large-diameter pipe could become the most critical bottleneck facing the gas industry's expansion. Moreover, what equipment or direct Western involvement Moscow is able and willing to purchase may not solve all the problems of Tyumen' development. Western technology may prove not much more successful at rapidly overcoming permafrost dif- ficulties than the Soviets, who have had consider- ably longer experience in that field. More likely, Western assistance will not remove the major bottlenecks created by Soviet organizational and industrial shortcomings. If basic infrastructure- particularly pipeline capacity-in northern Tyu- men' remains woefully inadequate, Soviet invest- ment in Western technical expertise will not produce satisfactory returns. Rising Costs Costs of Soviet gas production since the early 1970s have risen faster than those for any other major energy sector (see table 6). Although gas will remain less expensive to produce than oil or coal, its costs will continue to rise significantly. Investment in further drilling in the older gas- fields of the Ukraine, northern Caucasus, and Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Change in Production Costs in Constant Prices' Percent 1970 Over 1975 Over 1965 1970 Oil extraction -3.0 12.6 Gas production 8.5 45.9 Coal production 5.6 6.8 Electric power 0.1 2.4 ' CIA estimates. 25X1 2 Does not include pipeline transport or storage. Central Asia will constitute a progressively smaller share of total gas industry outlays, but as those regions' output falls more sharply beyond 1980, returns on that investment will plummet. Delays in bringing Tyumen' Oblast's gasfields and pipelines to full capacity, however, will prove the major source of higher costs. Development of the Urengoy, Yamburg, and Zapolyarny fields will require unprecedented outlays for infrastruc- ture and for production and pipeline equipment, hiking total gas industry investment in 1981-85 well beyond the 19 billion rubles initially allocat- ed for 1976-80. However, the Soviets' likely failure to construct an adequate infrastructure before 1985 will drag out field development while maintaining high costs for transport of supplies. Buildup of pipeline capacity will prob- ably remain behind schedule, preventing existing production capacity from being fully used and thus lowering investment returns. Stepped-Up Campaign Moscow's concern over the pace of Tyumen' gas development appears to have grown in recent months. Correspondingly, the Soviets have shown signs of stepping up their campaign to open the region's giant gas deposits. Since mid- 1977, Soviet press articles criticizing slow or sloppy handling of pipeline and field construction projects have increased in number and frankness. Major stories in Pravda, Izvestia, Sotsialisti- cheskaya industria, and Trud have aired com- plaints regarding those problems as well as the basic lack of infrastructure needed for industry As a result, budgetary allocations to the gas industry reportedly have been increased-along with those for oil-beyond the 19 billion rubles originally provided to the Gas Ministry for 1976- 80. In effect, Moscow appears to be shifting resources from older gas-producing areas to West Siberia, where it calculates that returns on investment will prove higher. Additional men and equipment have already been transferred to Tyumen' oil and gas regions. However, the lack of infrastructure, particularly in areas surround- ing large gas deposits as yet undeveloped, plus the persistent problem of building up pipeline capacity will probably prevent these extra re- sources from producing much more gas over the next several years than would be produced with- out them. Moreover, transfer of resources from older gasfields, especially those in the Ukraine, will ultimately force output there to drop even faster, undercutting part of the additional incre- ment in Tyumen' output that the stepped-up campaign will induce. 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Minsk `horn trogozhsk Central Center No. 2 rghts Central Z Asia Kotlas - Center No. 1 G I Kirov Uralsj *Semakov Novy Solinensk Port e Norilsk Yamburg~ 6: Pestsova Messoyakha Medvezhye OZapolyarny Urengoy Punga. Yubilenoy Gubk n Komsomol'sk IOV.ngapur West NizhnayaTura Siberian gk / rgut Nizhniy Tagil IJa/ Nizhnevartovsk Lowland Dnepropetrovsk Shebelinka Crimea \astopol Lisiohansk KRASIIOOAR KIYY Krasnodar KRAY Maikop Stavropol' STAVROPOL'S AZERBAIJAN F Groznyy Tbilisi Leningradskcye\\ North Aleksandroy Stavropol Gay North KRAY' 'aucasus Astrakhan' Central Asia- Center No. 3 Kirpichli Achak n Naip ? Ashkhabad ? C t No. Saar l l $ Bayram k AliMubare a, ~) ayskoye Deposits Major Soviet Natural Gas and Pipeline Systems lKharsavey #Bovanenko Ik Neifinsk orthem Lights 550013418 rengoy-Center 12600/1616 Uren9oy-Chelyabinsk 1600/994 Central Asia-Center 12700/1680 'Pipe#rtein n operation --- Diameter Capacity (KmJMi.) (Mm.) (Billion cu. m.l year) Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 1220-1420 56 1220-1420 40 1420 30 1020-1420 90 East Siberian Lowland Vilyuy Yakutsk pt r4s itIYaai r 'onfidential Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 ,007 000 00070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6 Approved For Release 2002/08/12 : CIA-RDP80T00702A000100070007-6