SOVIET OCCUPATION ECONOMY IN AUSTRIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
241
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 7, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 27, 1959
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8.pdf13.78 MB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION REPORT CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY This material contains information affecting the National Defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Laws, Title 18, U.S.C. Secs. 793 and 794, the transmission or revelation of which in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. SUBJECT Soviet Occupation Economy in Austria $ 7 AUG 1959 25X1 1 NO. PAGES REQUIREMENT NO. DATE OF INFO. PLACE & DATE ACQ. (study on the administration and exploitation of the industrial and 25X1 petroleum installations seized as "German assets" by the Soviets and operated by them. The section on the petroleum industry covers the historical' background, Nazi exploitation and development, and Soviet dismantlings, while.emphasizing Soviet production and distri- bution techniques, sales and profits, The section on the other enterprises emphasizes statistical presentation of estimates of Soviet sales, profits, deliveries to the Bloc, as well as organizational methods, ARMY NAVY AIR BI Li dq-a.2- -.L9 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 DOVW OCC117$T 1 SCOMM 1$ AEI$TATA Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Scope and limitations. First Section. T U CONDUCT OF "!E SPAT BCOWW Short Survey of the Or.gin and Development of Soviet Assets in Austr$A II II; Disposition of Soviet *conaatic Divisions; Their Relationship to each other, to J scow and Austria Tasks of Soviet Occupation Economy in Austria and Achievements 17 IV Effects on Austrian Economy 23 Second Section. 26 SOY= PEk ADSUM3$TRATIDJ 26 I Development of the Austrian Petroles Industry before the Anschluss 26 1. Oil Industry Up to 1938 26 2. The Refineries until 1938 32 II GerMn Occupation PerLod 1938-1945 33 1. Introductory Remarks 33 2. Influence of Oerw^n Oil Capital 34 A. Petrol4mm 34 a. Natural Gas 40 C. Refineries 41 D. Fuel Marketing Organizations 45 UI Prom War's End to motion of the S 45 1. End of the War P+e*iod 45 2. Soviet Intervention 46 A. Plant Dismantling 46 A. Reasons for the Dismantling Policy 50e C. Switch to Eootic Exploitation Policy 50a Page 1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Page IT SW nization, Work Methods and Production 52 1. motion of the ' 52 2. Organization 54 A. Development 54 B. Personnel 58 C. Accounting, Plgns and Controls 65 (a) Accounting 65 (b) Plans 69 (c) Controls 71 3. The Role of the 3e in the SW 71 4. Crude oil and Natural Gas Production 76 A. Drilling Activities 76 (a) Opening e*p of Now Oilfields 76 (b) Turbo-Dr usng 78 (c) Productiveness, Drilling Costs Drilling Maters 80 (d) Opening of Natural Gas Depoms 82 e) Mural ous Production and its Rxploita ion 84 B. Gasoline Prod .ction 86 (a) Production Points and Production 86 (b) Gasoline Production Accountancy 87 C. Total Oil Proometiou 88 D. Distribution $nd WAS 91 9. S* Installattons by Brune-hen 92 5.. The SW Bstinar1*6 103 A. Lc bau finery 104 104 B. Urheucburg C. Noosbierbawn 106 D. Yoesendorf f' 108 1. Schvrechat 110 ii Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Page (a) History, Capacity and Investments 110 (b) Pipelines and Tr a port 112 (C) Storage P*cilitreat 113 F. Central Laboratory 113 6. Central Tank Station 114 A. fipelirAw* Transport and Storage Crude and Heft 114 T. The Geophysical DeV elopme nt 117 V. Surr ende r of the SW to the Austrian Republic 118 Third Section. 125 V PL M ANTS 125 I The VSIA Industrial Prate 125 1. History and Ox ization 125 A. Administration 125 B. Internal Develppsent of Industrial Administration 125 C. functions of the atrial Adainistrati.on 126 D. Industrial policy 127 H. Investment Policy 128 2. Pertoreeance of tea Industry 129 A. T irn*ver; its structure and development 129 (a) Total VISU Turnover 129 (b) Turnover krenralapmr t 131 (c) fiver Structure 133 (d) Iffier of . 1oye es 133 B. & Profits 135 C. Production for the stern Bloc and the Development of Deliveries thereto 135 iii Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 D. Performance of the Individual Adminis- trations Borten Podyomlk Autovelo mmmi Zeement lCrasim Letex Less Wkus II M Land and Forestry Zntorpr~Um 1. Deva1o mental History and Rxperise nts in Exploitation 2. Interval Organization and Personnel A. Ce> osition of the L XU Main Division B. Table of Organization of the general Directorate III Mien--Film Page 136 136 139 148 151 160 163 168 174 176 178 178 179 179 182 186 Fourth Section. 187 T?t FIT DA PPI COKPARi (DSC) 187 I History 187 II Organization and Personnel 188 1. Relationship to there scow Directorate 188 2. Relationship to and the Soviet Military Bank 189 3. Inteer"al Organization 191 iv Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 I Tashi of the Danube Sh ping Co. Within the Soviet Occupation Zco - Attested Pbundati4n of a Soviet-Austrian D$C DW and -a lot Is, 11 11211"m rprit~r as Soviet xbmpoly 3. The IDW as a .in Soviet Support point on the Darmbe Page 194 194 195 196 IV Survey of Services Drawn Frn the Austrian Sconoa.y 197 Fifth Section. E 1 IN m OCCUPA 199 and ol'clt of 'Prods and I t ~ ~~ _ 1 i gh t 99 Trade in the Occupation ZoonmW 201 1. The Soviet State TM" organization and firms 201 2. MrJMC and the Comt Party fires 207 UI Org iaation and asks rof the Transport System 213 IT Final Asuarks 216 Sixth Section. iR BOYM l t l'TA#!' 217 217 I Historical 217 1. Foundation, of the 217 2. Dissolution in 1955 218 II Organisation 218 1. Relationship b the ibacow Directorate 218 2. Relationship to the leadership in Austria 219 3. Relationship to other Occupation Institutions 219 4. Relationship to Austrian institutions 219 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 5. Inteenal Organization Page 220 6. Personnel 220 UI Tssica of the S 221 1. The SIB as Accounting and Paarnts Institution 221 2. The SM ' s Credit PtInction 223 3. Control Over Is* of Credit Znvestaeents 224 4. bole of the Hank in the International payment S"tea 224 5. SM as Instrment of Soviet Fiscal policy 225 IV =ffects on the Austrian Economy Seventh Section. =IA AiCCOMTI +!S' t 225 226 226 I Principles of Planning and Account Balancing 226 I3 Plant Planning and Accounting 228 UI Accounting Between the I ividual plants and Their Administration 230 Iv Mast Planning and Accounting 230 V Planing and Accountin ithin the MIA Directorate General and of the Administration of Soviet Assets Abroad 231 vi Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Next 6 Page(s) In Document Denied Iq Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 First Section. = cMM 99 = 22WAM NAM sa* Is= F 21 ftwn, W- WIL925MI of AVAO at in Au~tr~. The origin of Soviet assets in Austria goes back to the occupation by Soviet troops at the begisning of April 1945. The first Soviet asset in Austria was thereto*e based an ~, taar ,,,l trrr. The t e (Trophy Administration) was sat up by the occupation troops under Oenteral Sorisaov with headquarters at that ties in !bathing, near Vi enra. This was in inetr aentality whlh had plainly been previously planned and which was under the orders of the emwr%der of the occupation armor, or in other words,, under those of the appropriate division in the Moscow War Ministry. (For details seae the report entitled s "AUfsetchnung ueber swei Unt*rredungen sit IgEM Dr. D. 4m 23. and November 1957-1 The activity of this Trophy Administration has already been touched upon in our paper entitled " Bericht utsber the Unterredung von 2. Oktober 1956, page 6." This shows that it was placed under the orgy's of a division of the War Ministry in Moscow. Further details are contained in the above- mentioned report. We therefore can speak of a M TAiitl Fi3'A running from the nixeg of the occupation to the, foundation of IXIA in spring 1946. This Military Place can be subdiVided into three parts. The entire Military Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Phase is marlaed by a continual diminishing in importance of the Meaning and tasks of the Trophy Adnifistration. In the first period of this phase, everything that had any value and could be moved was requisitioned or dismantled and, if not needed by the occupation troops, seat to Russia. In the second period only plants of military importance were dismantled or those which were considered to be German property. In the third period disaMantling was limited to particular eras and explosives plants. (See our papers "Bericht umber tie Bespr ech- ungen nit Herrn Dr. H. am Disnatag, den 13. and ams Dienstag, den 20. November 1956 nacYmtittags. " ) As we have already proved in our three reports on the conversa- tions with Dr. lganfred &W in the accompanying reports on the conversa- tions with Dr. D.,j early summer 1946 saw the beginning of the phase which narked the establishment of the Soviet economic organization in Aus As we have already shown in detail, this phase was introduced through finding and defining -iesan property. The juridical basis for this was the August 1945 Potsdam Agreement. In accordance with Article VU of this Agrossont all German property in Austria became the property of that ooouNi power in whose zone it lay. It MY be added at this point that the legality of the Potsdam Agreement is doubtful. Our Itearch show that on a maber of occasions this Argta.nt was effectively tam in dealing with the Soviets by pointing out that neither in America nor in England had the Potsdam Agreement been ratified. 0 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 This objection was raised in 1945, for example, by Dr. ariedi, who was employed by the Soviets as geological advisor, in talking with Major It tnski and Colonel Yegorov, Trophy Administration officers for the oil industry. (Dr. triedl is now Chief Geologist with the Oesterreichische lltneraloei ver ) a The Soviets' riposte to this was Army Order No. 17--reproduced WEE ' in the 1~&BjM/?tu of 6 JUly 1946 under the headings "Surrender of German Assets in Eastern Austria to the , " in which the assets regulation of the Potsdam A$reeaent were picked up and declared of fi.ial for Austria. It was pointed out that regardless of the legality of the Potsdam Agreement, this army order w*a in any event valid for Austria and must be obeyed. However for4eful this argumentation was., it never- theless shows that the Soviets had some doubts about the validity of the Potsdam Agreement. Be" we not briefly motion the period in Soviet occupation po.l..ay khtah is marked by attempts to set up mixed Soviet-Austrian Ow abevo-mentioned Dr. Priedi us that towards the end of 1945 he took ;part in tiatiolrss during which the Soviets proposed that the Austrian oil assets lying in the Soviet son* of occupation should be administered by a # , et-Austrlsn company. The Aovi ets revaled similar intintions with regards to the organization of the Der Whipyards they had taker over. This is explained more Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 fully in our section dealing with the Danube Shipping Company. Up until now little attention has been paid in research to this period because the Austrianafrejected these Soviet proposals to form mixed companies. Nevertheless, this is not without importance since similar Soviet plans were carried out in the Satellites. There, in important sectors, such as aviation, mining and in certain industries, mixed companies were set up in waxy, Czechoslovakia? Bulgaria, etc., in which the Soviets soon became clearly predominant. This soon became an effective instrument of an integrated Soviet economic policy. The fact that the Soviets had concrete intentions to form such companies in Austria is also proof that they had as their objective the incorporation of Austria into the family of Satellites. Through use of the mixed companies they wanted to ensure themselves of a "voluntary" and unmistakable collaboration on the part of the Austrians. When this was denied them, they decided on the formation of purely Soviet economic corporations in Austria. The fundamentals of the establishment and development of these Soviet economic organizations in Austria have already been dealt with in our YAenfred reports of 1956. The concept formulated at that time has been appreciably confirmed by further research. In the fol- lowing chapter these element$ will be pulled together again. Here, it must be shortly noted that also in this phase of the development of the Soviet economic organizations there were three steps. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 The first step went-up to around 1951 and reveals a period of gene"a.pros s _.ty and hi?(iho fits. It was a time of expansion for all Soviet economic installations. In this period the economic organi- rations were also being used in increased measure for political aims. The Putsch attempt of 1950 shows us that the Soviets, through use of their economic power and through use of the people who were drawn into their huge economic apparatus were endeavoring directly to attain unadulterated political power, This:-period to also early distinguished by attempts to fit the Soviet economic enclave in with the Soviet and satellite economic circuit. (See our report "Sericht weber die Zwei Unterredungen nit germ Dr. D. an 23. and 27. November 1957" of December 1957.) The second step is distinguished by the appearance of crises in the Soviet economic apparatus--decrease of turnover and profit, liquidation and merging of plants and administrations, attempts at reorganization. During this period there were tergiversations In the field of political aims. (See third section, I. The USIA Industrial Plants.) The third step started at the beginning of 1955 and is distin- guished by the ever clearer intention to liquidate the Soviet economic complex in Austria. It ended with the handing over of the Soviet assets to Austria in May 1955 and is, in a certain sense, being con- tinued through the deliveries of materials in accordance with the terms of the State Treaty. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 II. DLOMISUM of Sov t C R&XWjjAj e to ALO r 19 ft2ft W1 12 t Our 1956 wed Report has shown in detail that USIA was founded in 1946 by emissaries sent from Moscow. These reports were comple- mented by Dr. D. and they have confirmed the time of the incorporation of =1A. The details can be summo-rized as follows t The =VA (VFRAVLYB $ tYRTSIWS KCHESTV ! YOSTOC1U X AVBWM), meaning - Administration of Soviet Assets in Eastern Austria - later had its designation changed to USIA which stands for Administra- tion of Soviet Assets in Austria. It was set up by the Moscow organi- nation called 1PIAVLY=13 S0TFYSTS URCMSSTVtRI ZAGRARITSEY - Administration of Soviet Ass*ts Abroad - or 17312 for short. An influential person in this Moscow administration was a man named Morkulov, a former member of the HCVD. With regard to the establishment and incorporation of the Soviet economic organization in Austria there is one fact which is worthy of note and this is the lack of clarity of jurisdiction. However, the Western researcher must take into account the fact that such a lack of clarity is rather the rule in the Soviet system and in many 14 instances is deliberate. The intentional duality of jurisdiction makes control easier and keeps those exercising the jurisdiction in a sautl1a state of uncertainty thereby limiting the possibility of autocratic management. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 As we have already said USIA means Administration of Soviet Assets in Austria. It therefore follows that all Soviet assets in Austria should be under the control of this institution. However, our research has revealed that right from the very beginning several technical ministries and comond points in Moscow participated in the direction of Soviet assets in Austria. However, our sources are not of one mind with regard to the precise division of jurisdiction and the same applies to the ambers of our research team. But it is more a question of differences in formula. One thing is certain and that is our researchers have come across 11 central points in Moscow about which we shall speak later. One thing Is absolutely certain and that is the Administration of Soviet Assets in Austria was directed straight from Moscow. It is plainly a matter of the establisi=wnt of a Soviet economic enclave in a foreign country. As already mentioned, and in accordance with our report entitled "A umber s wet UJnterzredungen mit Norm Dr. D. am 23. und 27. November 57" of December 57, the Soviets at first seem to have enter- tained the naive idea that those Austrian (formerly Oeuman) economic corporations which now became Soviet property would automatically become integrated into the Soviet econc y. Nowever# it became plain that it was virtually impossible, and certainly very uneconomical to procure every screw or pencil needed by Soviet assets in Austria from the Satellites or from the Soviet Uniorn. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Therefore, very soon after the establishment of the USIA they had to start thinking of entering into at least a partial exchange of aoa odities with the surrounding Austrian economic aysten. For this purpose, the first bigger establishaent named DEGOS was set up simultaneously with the foundation of USIA. (See "Aulf xoich- nung usb r zwei Unterredungen nit Serrn Dr. D. am 23. and 27. November 57.") DOS undertook the representation of the Administration of LigPt Industry and had to procure those cosmodities necessary for USIA production activities. This was done by an exchange against those commodities that USIA could spare and which were not necessary to fulfill orders for the Bast. A sort of economic mega -xi-vow, was set up and later became so extended that more than 50 percent of production under Russian influence somehow found its way into the Austrian economic circuit. (Be* Third Section) iiawever, the Soviets were never able to bring themselves to think of their property on the territory of the Austrian Republic in the Western sense. The Soviets always thought of administering their property as meaning? to a certain degree, incorporation into their *con may and its use for their political aims. Accordingly, they continually prejudiced the sovereignty of the Austrian State in regard to its system of taxation. So,, in prin- ciple, those plants under So let administration did not pay any taxes on turnover,, capital or profits. Purthermre, they only recognized 8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 the juridical sovereignty of the Austrian State when they felt like it. It frequently happened that decisions by civil courts against Soviet-controlled plants were disregarded. As can be seen in our splRctal reports ,: of May to November 1957, the Soviets particularly disregarded the customs regulations of the Austrian State to a very high degree. They also paid no attention to the regulations concerning raw material, management and transport. Our reports show that the presence of Soviet property in Austria had effects far different than the existence of foreign property in another state normally entails. The stipulations of the Potsdam Agreement not only resulted in the loss of very important resources to the Austrian economy, but they also led to the setting up in Austria of a foreign economic en- clave of colonial character which had very decided effects on the State and its economy. The political contact of this economic enclave with the Austrian authorities was carried out through the Intermediary of the Offices of High Ce isstoner s , specifically through the atandsnturss (See Manfred Report 1956). Through the latter the Austrian authorities were informed of the requisitioning of Serrun property when this had been previously decided by the Interested =1A office or by the Office of the High Commissioner. We now turn to the estabLishmes~t and incorporation of Soviet economic organisations in Austria. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 As already pointed out there existed the Trophy Administration which occupied itself in a one-aided manner with econcymic tasks inasmuch as it carried out considerable requisitions,, dismantlings and transportation for the fist. =IVA (later changed to USIA) was founded in early st er 19+6 in a meeting at the Imperial Hotel between Colonel Borisov of Moscow and Kr. ]togan of the political division of USXZ. It is noteworthy that the fouxidation was carried out with the cooperation of the Austrian Com Mist Party. (See the Manfred Report.) From the beginning on, howev*r, the administration and the manner in which the branches were set up both followed a plan drafted in Moscow. The administrative methods were Soviet as sere its plans and basic outline. The hub of UTA as well as of all Soviet economic corporations in Austria was the Division for Research into German Property. It was incorporated into USIA and collaborated intensively with the KPOe. The directorate of USIA was composed of a Chief of USIA, his representatives, the Managing Staff and the Branch Associations Administration. A USIA Table of Organization will be found in our report entitled "Rericht ueb.r die Beeprechuhg nit Rerrn Dr. X. an Dienatag, den 13. and Dienstag den 20. Move ber 1956, nachaittags." From it will be seen that all industries, farms and real estate and a part of the trade which were administered by the Soviets were under USIA. 10 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 According to oral reports by Dr. D., the Chief of USIA had three represerntative s s one for political, another for personnel and a third for cossmsrcial affairs. The most important divisions weret Th. Plans Division. Through it production of all Branch Adminis- tration* was planned in accordance with scow's wishes and approbation. The Commercial Division. This was in charge of procurement, sates and of the Secretariat. It was also in charge of imports and exports. This Division was often re.organized and for a time it had under it an important organizatiory sub-division called the Central Conserce Bureau which was mainly in charge of imports and exports. The Pinanoe Division. This looked after accounting and banking. It also drafted the financial plans and saw to their implementation. The Legal Division. This Division was of special importance particularly since it looked after special corporations such as Wien-Pilo and the Danube Shipping Company. It worked in close col- laboration with the above-mentioned W vision for Research Into German Property. Special importance was also attached to the Plans Division, the Secret Division and the Trade lbdon Division, all of which worked closely with the MM. The most important chiefs in =U were: Borisov, Tikhomirov,, Kalyavin, Pedetkov and Krivoshin. We have not been able to find the names of all their representatives but the most important were: Tichomirov., Negrassov, xabalevska, Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Voronov. The important names in the Juridical Division worst Yedotyevs Zhodtaav and Xa.untsev. Also must be mentioned gssipov and Shenko, leaders of the Central Coasmercial Bureau and the erstwhile chief of the Division for Research into German Property, Orlov. Our documents show that the careers of nearly all the USIA chiefs ended in.. arrest and return to Russia. It should also be mentioned that at the top of USIA sat liaison men of the Me and of the Co mxnist labor unions. The main ones worts Dellinger and Steiner, Tee Third Section for the agricultural enterprises which were in USIA. The chiefs in this sector wares Rusakin, Smirnov and Avtayev. Certain corporations, which according to the organizational plan in the Manfred Report appeared on the directorate level certainly went throlgh a phase of special development. There are different opinions regarding the extent of independence and jurisdiction they had. It may be surmised that the Soviet economic bodies in Austria could not be built up systaa*tically and that it was the Potsdam Agreement which proscribed which plants were to be considered to be Soviet property, This naturally resulted in an unevenness in the distribution of the branches. 12 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 For instanee, all of the Austrian oilfields and a great part of the refineries were immediately considered to be Soviet property and had to be organized. The importance of the petroleum plants alone explain the reason for the foundation of the Soviet Petroleum Administration (SMV). The Second Section of this paper reports on the exploitation f ':: Y Y j,. and utilization of the Austrian oil installations carried out by the 3MV. At this point, however, let it be remembered that apart from its connections with USIA, the 3MV was under the command of the Oil Ministry in Moscow which supplied its personnel. The already mentioned IM Friedl has reported that Director4eneral Ryabinin telephoned daily to the Oil Ministry in Moscow. The Danube Shipping Company is also dealt with exhaustively in the Fourth Section. It is certain that this enterprise was under the technical orders of the Moscow Shipping Ministry. It is also certain that it used the Juridical Division and the Central Staff of USIA. The chiefs worst Major Kagan, Admiral E. 0. Swborsky, 0. Sutirin, N. Kriukov and J. Kononov. The least information of all is available on Wien-Film. However, it is certain that it was under the technical orders of the Film Ministry in Moscow and also of Sov-Export. In the Fifth Section we discuss Trade and Transport. These sectors are characterized by the fact that they could not be entirely taken care of by Moscow's organizational plans. We present a detailed description of the Soviet trade organized by USIA as well as of the 13 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 transport concern Juschwneschtrans. We also present an analysis of that sector-of trade and transport whose direction and administration was the responsibility of the EPOe, and which thereby enjoyed a certain degree of independence. The Soviet Military Bank occupies a special place in our research. It developed out of a Field Bank. It is discussed in the Sixth Section. Its first Director.Oeneral was Tsirulik. It is also known that the Soviet Military Bank (Si ) was managed by 001-Hank in Moscow, which also supplied personnel. It functioned in the same manner as a Soviet bank, It is equally certain that it was the sole financial institution for all Soviet bodies operating in Austria. Authorities and the research team agree that the SI's finance policy was, for all practical purposes, determined by the leading personalities of the Soviet economic corporations in Austria. These were, in first place, the chiefs of USIA and SM!, and also those of the Danube Shipping Company and of Wien Film and, of course, the chiefs of Sie itself. It is noteworthy that when USSR was not up and occupied the not very spacious premises in the Graf Starhemberg Gust in the IV District, the SMS moved in with it and that when USIA- moved to the Trattnerhof in the I District, SNO went along too. In other words, SMS was always united with USIA. It is also clear that long-term credits were formally outside the SIS's jurisdiction and that ittook care of the short-term ones. Furthermore, it is clear that the $to Austria fulfilled the same 14 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 standardizing control functions as the banks in the Sov), This signified control of currency, of stock-keeping at, - similar accounting and quantitive economic factors. The research team is in agreement that the functions of the Bonet bank cannot be Compared with those of a western bank since the financing of an industry is determined in the last analysis by the production plan. This is drawn up by those people responsible for production who,, like all other participants must bow to the financial sector, namely the Bank. The subordinate position of the $J --subordinate to tai-Bank in Moscow and to the Central Offloss of the Soviet economic corporations in Austria--must remain in the dark to a certain degree. Nevertheless, it is certain that the SM8 was a factor of unity in a system that had become broken up through the influence of the technical ministries. The reason for this was that the 30 was the sole financial institu- tion in the network of Soviet assets in Austria, Other unifying factors, its our authorities maintain, were the representatives of the DIICPD an one hand and the Communist Party on the other, who without expert on were present in all offices of the Soviet administration in Austria. All Soviet economic organizations were thus held together by throe factorst the 80 financial institution= the leadership of the XCVD (the bureau of Gen. *yelkin in Baden), and through the common Party leadership,, which had a Party secretary in every organization. 15 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 A further organisatory unifying factor was the High Co nissioner's Rconomic Division, under the orders of High Commissioner Kulagin's economic advisor. The chiefs of USIA were, through this Division in constant contact with the Directors- *neral of SMV, of the Danube Shipping Company,. of Wien-Film. and or the Sie and also with economic specialists of the Austrian and Soviet Communist parties and with the economic experts of the 3. (See our Report " Auf seichnung ueber zwei Untsrredungen alit Herrn Dr. P. an 23 u. 27 Nov 1957" of December 57.) In shy, the following can be said of the Soviet economic corporations in Austriae In the early days of the occupation, from the Spring of 1945 on, the economic setup was under military administration. There was the Trofeinoye Upravleniye. Task wass plunder, dismantling and transport of machines, installations and stocks of finished products as well as supplies for the occupation troops. It was Justified by military law. In 1946 claimed Soviet assets in Austria were taken stock of, requisitioned and organized by USIZ in Moscow through the intermediary of special representatives and with the help of the SPO.. This was dons on the basis of the Potsdam Agreement. USIVA was founded and later became USIA. The SMV f the Danube Shipping Co., Wien~-Film and the Slit were created. Within the framework of USIA special importance was acquired by the Soviet trade chain and by duschwneschtrans. The same applies to Intrac with regards to Communist Party firers. Eleven Moscow ministries and central offices went to make up the directorate. They wares USIZ, the Petrole= Ministry, Ministry 16 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Ministry of Shipping, Ministry of Films (with which Sov.Zxport and Q0841lank were connected), Ministry of Foreign Affairs to whom the High Commissioner was responsible,, Ministry of State Security, Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Foreign Trade with which 1IU worked in matters dealing with trade and transport questions. (see our report on the foundation of Juschwrs schtranst "Spezialbericht, Transport-.and $pe itionskentor t7uschwneschtrans, Ivan Popov, Wien IV, Wohllebengasse 8" and the report "Auf2eichnUng umber swei Uhterredungen mit Herrn Dr. D. an 23. and 27 November 1957 And finally, the land and forestry divisions of USIA were under the band and Forestry Ministry in Moscow. It is clear that the activity of 11 Moscow organizations on Austrian territory should give rise to complications and tensions. This situation arose on the one hand because of the method of adminis- tration employed by Moscow and on the other because we have to deal here with Soviet assets in Austria which were governed by yet another Moscow organization, the U$ZZ. III. Achievements The tasks which fell to the Soviet economic corporations in Austria have already been briefly mentioned. In a number of reports, particularly in the Freliaai $ry Report, this has bean gone into in detail. In summary, it may be said* First off, let it be noted that the economic tasks cannot be separated from the political ones, but must rather be regarded as a 17 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 whole, in accordance with Marxist theory. According to with cannot be gone into her*-t 0hX&rk balsaae sheet ntroduc+ed. The Zoorneuburg Refinery whose capital was predominantly Swiss and 42 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 l94 and to Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 umanian, was acquired by the Deutsche Gasolln AG. The Swiss franc claims of 640, 547.38 of the Wigamur Company of Chur,, Switzerland and 874,254.15 of Aktiengesellschaft Alma? also of Chur against the Korneuburg .neraloelraffinorio were transferred to the Credit-u1 Minier S.A.R. of Bucharest and to the ontan-Urxton AG, Vienna and then tray - ferred by these firms to Deut6che 4asoitn, Berlin. 10 'arben hold a 50 percent interost in Deutsche Gaooli.n, while Anglo-Saxon and Standard Oil each hold 25 percent. In September 1940 capital was # 300,,400. Until 1934 the installation of the., refinery was of the continual crude oil distillation process (four blowers of 35-tone capacity: daily capacity 160.200 tons); high vacuum installations.. benzin recti, erso lubrication oil refiners as well as atz iliary installation each as boiler house, shops, tanks, rails and divers bldinCs now installations were bull From 1939-1945 Qasolln AG erected a filling station for light products on the site of the tank instal- lations and at the wharf, on the Danube, the crude oil ruapinL station. As far as the quality of the equipment was concerned in 1944 it must be noted that It was antiquated. Voesendor' Refiner 1938 Reichswerke Hermann Goering (later named Benzin-and Denzol- Verband, Bochum) acquired Voesendorf from David E'anto AG (Crad tansta lt, Dutch intermediary), Production equipment at Voosendorf consisted of an atmospheric installation, with a maximum daily output of 6#000 uono,, 43 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 plus a lubrication oil refinery with a maximum monthly production of 500 tons. It is to be noted that the atmospheric distillation installation was changed to a vacuum system which resulted in a capacity of 2,000 tons monthly of heating oil. WAS MUM In 1939 the hebau Re rovided with great subterranean tanks by the Ostemterkischs Nineraloetwsrken G.m.b.H. Participating in this company were the German sister concerns of Socony Vacuum and Shell, the Geraaan-American Petroleum Company and fhenan a Oss aga Mineral Oil Works A4;, each to the extent of five percent. The refinery t con- nected with the oil field by a pipeline. In 194+ the labsu refinery had a crude oil production of 950 tone a day. Up until 1945 the heosbtsrbaum refinery belonged to the Donau- Chasie AG,, coupled with 10?Amseaniakwsrke, *erseburg. In 1941, the brought 30 carloads of refining equipment out of France and used it to set up the so-called "Dora" distillation plant. It was a combined atmospheric--vacuum crude oil distillation plant (Poster Wheeler system). In addition to "Dora" a S.F. installation was built with a S.F. I and N.P. 2 oven plant and coupled to g. Y. I and N.V. 2. The N.Y. installa- tion was a catalytic benzin (gasoline) reforming one. Its purpose was to produce aviation gasoline out of normal straight;-run benzin (gasoline) through catalytic dehydration processes. Beside the X.F. installation they also built an 88 installation. 44 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 This was coupled with the polymerization installation, and with the oil distillation and the refining installations. Thee produced the finest lubricants (for submari s) . The Economic Research CoMpany (Wirtschaftliche WHO) constructed during the first yeare of the war a great tank instal- lation at Lobau with pipelines to the Danube port and with lines to the oil fields. D. j The Germans also showed great activity in the field of fuel. The ring Works purchased the filli tion organization of Fanto Ail,, while Deutsche Gasolin acquired the tank installations of Creditul Hinter S.A. The pump station organization was broadened and in the provincial capitals groat tank installations were built. Besides these there was also the German Olex firm which was interested in the filling station business. In the war years the petroleum Central Bureau was established with administrative centers in Vienna and 3als- burg. The entire fuel busines through the letroleca Central became nothing more than ad jUncts of this Bureau. MIL 1. M9 9L NZ IM M As has already been explained and shown in a tables the develop- ment of the oil industry and refineries was destroyed by bombing in the final months of the war, and also other means. Oil 45 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 production dropped by about one-third and the output of the refineries went down by 50 percent. DrimLng machines and other apparatus were taken out of Lower Austria oil fields and sent to the west where they would be in lees danger (St. Poslten, Aeestettten, Vypor Austria and Sal sburg. This and the whiners were lost forever for the most part. wearer, on orders of the Nigh CommaW nothing was to be destroyed but put out of working order by the removal of electric motors, eta. Little doge was done to the oil fields in the fighting. 2. .W abMMUM A. ,iP As a result of the arriva: e was don* to the oil Indust trios, one serer the beginning of a viets, grave and lone-lasting as well as in other Indus- f ruthless diwntling. This was acco *nied by the effort of anything that cad be moved. was carted off Witout a kind of system or sense towards In the cour" Zl. 50 125 04/415 frau the an order entitled authorities regarding the quantities and type of o ditios carted off. It re"a Order e! 8 ilrne 1945 plete drilling equ snt 81 4. 21*ctric esters & 46 zoo Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 %tit.-0 100 145 Cables and electric wires 365 8. Stoma boilers 32 9. Drilling equipsemt 1,004 tons 10. Hoisting blocks 21 pieces 11. Pipes 15,494 tons 12. Pump rods Wire cable 245 14. Armatures 15. Tools, Supplies 1,500 t, 16. Chains (roller chains) 144 it This was s one of the order. Kounndo of the Red Array the **tic* of the Authority Councillors Dr. R. Myer. Col. Jftineer Akishin Lt. -l . Aktshrarin Engineer Lt. Col. Kaminski Lt. Col. Crosdov. s) not part of complete installations. Order Of 8 Juno 1945. (Continued) Oeraan Property 48 pieces 48 pieces 11 35% 10 73 75% 60 47 10 pieces 19 " Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 aerman property 192 pieces 94 .145 320 tons 10 pieces Tea' t 84% 168 pieces 74% 74 32 26 feces 739 107 38 680 5 tons 115 tons 310 10 pieces 22 pieces 14 11 61% 14 " 7 it 862 tons 800 805 tons 195 tons .1? , 900 is 192 11 260 11 800 12,000 it 3,090 11 70% 160 it 85 11 80% 210 ti 50 it r1 483 11 62% 356 1,410 11 70% 1,,060 92 it 650 85 11 132 r1 440 r1 55 " Noted by Committee of Austrian Oil Companim. (signed) R.O. Nlrik Director: Ateyrer ltgineer Gerzobek Dr.uswirth This protocol shows that of the available materiel in the oil fields up to 83% was taken off to the 3oviat Union. The table also shows that the Soviets paid particular attention to drilling equipment. On 8 June 1945 a meeting was held in the offices of the Rohoel Company, 8chwarzenberg Flats No. 18, in which participated not only the representatives of the Oil Committee and the highest -. representatives of the Mines Authority, but above all a delegation of Russian officers. 48 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Our authoritative documents report that this meeting resulted in severe differences of opinion between the Russian officers as there were two groups fighting over the requisitioning of the available production materiel in the oil fields. The argument was about the method of utilization of such materiel. Judging by the results of our earch it may be assumed that the two groups represented the one, the Trophy Administration, (and that meant the Moscow Kinistry of War) and the other, the representatives of VSZZ* that is to say the Ministry or Petroleum. The discussion at this meeting hinged on requisitioning and on the quickest possible transportation of materiel to the Soviet Union on one hand and on the other the quickest possible utilization of the oil and natural gas industry withtiaat remained of the equipment. Thus, there were two contradictory thmos under discussion. The meeting ended, as already indicated, in loud argument since the Russian officers could not *me to an agrei However, as has been seen, the installations and materiel of the refineries and the Reusiedl Works (7000 kw) were not taken away. The 20 July 19+5 meeting followed the same course and the fol. lowing protocol was drawn ups Proto j 1245 Taken into consideration are the amounts of gas necessary for automotive transport for the Cnity of Vienna and for the Ssesaando of the Red Army, 49 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 1. Natural gas installations at $em rring, Adarkiaa and Zistersdorf will remain intact where they are. 2. In $taa mersdorf there will remain a functioning gas pumping station comprising three compressors. BY Nothan undertakes to complete building of the three remaining cmaw pressers which are to be taken to Russia. From the same installation 24 storage tanks are to be taken to the Soviet Union. 3. Natural gas tanks at Bullsndorf, Heusiedi, Bohenruppersdort and Gross Schweinbarth are to be taken complete to Russia. IV Nathan undertakes to complete the three, compressors at Gross $chweinbarth, namely to complete the lacking armatures. o of the Red Aare Engineer Lt. Col. B. Kaminski Committee of Austrian oil firms Dr. Aberer Dr. Friedl Dr. Hauswirth. NV Nathan OmbN Koller. $uedostdeutsche Ferngas AO Engineer Guentner. .50 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 a OEM for the''21,49 tl m Poll dis antlingst give the following assumed reason for the Russian order, plainly sting from lbscow, that as amuch productive machinery as possible should be dismantled and brought to the Soviet ion.. 2. The possi, .ity, that was not at first recognized, of exploiting the oil fields in their own interest and to make use of the existing installations. 3. The fact that the true value of the der Austria oil and gas region was not yet recognized. At array event, the general order was given to the Red Army that all important materiel and installations were to be taken away. C. Snitch to Awoke Exaloltailloon Policy Already in June 1945 a beginning was made to the taking of measures to organize the economic exploitation of the oil industry. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 According to the already often rationed Dr. priedi who actually experienced these even mixed Soviet*AuStrian oil originally intended to form a to be named $ov phts. The influence of ftjor (gdit. tere above list says he was a Lt. Col.) i tinskyr who was in charge of dissantling, waned,, while Lt. Col. Yegorov from the Oil Ministry and geology ?rofossor Varenzov saw their* in- was hold with representative gentlemen from Noscow attended by the erstwhile 11 nister of Commerce Heinl and the former representative Raab. The formation of $ov- phta did not cam about. The Potsdam Agreement gave the Soviets th* guarantee that the installations of the Lower Austria oil fields would "legally" be theirs insofar as they property. They therefore decided to go into production. They undertook rr with all energy with the aid of what machinery remained and those specialists they could find to build up again the oil industry in Austria. Booty that had not yet b keen away from Austria was brought back to the oil fields and to the refineries. Sven materiel what had been taken brought back. Iittwever;, most of it was by then hardly useable. A little while later even ca drilling equipment was sent from Siberia to Lower Austria. This was in accordance with the orders given by the Soviet offices which were housed in the Neusiedl and Vienna X. 1 AG in Xistersdorf 51 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Q,ENniINtlon._ 9L -ft IM Zn order to achieve the planned developaaent and exploitation of the Austrian oil fields, October 1945 saw the creation of the $ovyotsi ye $ phtyonoye Upravloniys. The Initial # stdd for the G rrewan rendering o: ly $owjet1xvhe *i neralsolverwaltung Offices were at first in Vienna in the Zantgiase. Our documentation Stresses that with this steep the and c"o to the epoch of military adaainistr*tion of the (aril) region. ?creation and development of specialists in the Moscow Petroleasa winist: of SW and are not krown wi and that Is the *0 MOO the two were from the very be financ 't is Doti n Lt of the work of Istive positions but on. thins is certain one. It is also evident that eted through the $10 clear that 11&1A and. AW gave each other mutual support and exchanged needed supplies between then. Our specialists report that from the very in that 11' was obliged to which the Ldered too high, economically speaking the 11W into production and was gable to trans: rapidly res easily into cash. In accordance with the Potsdaa Agent a s stipulations t took over the fallowing oil concerns 52 ve support to the 111 industries s from U at prices d therefore appear that ~tronaer since it it spheres of influences Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 z+uu--aus l i . I ' l l and all the assets of fit" p- in LAW*r Aust .a. over the following refineriesi A' ZX' letz re of the Lo statnt from the Legal Divisions "The Lobau refinery was Lod with the following th the aid of important Qer f'! means aid restored after bambing attacks." Zn 1946, Soviet administration also took over the fuel distri- buting along with their tank installations in the Soviet Zone. In 1947s the merged and formed iolin and BY (B usin- 'izol-V.rban4 ) Orop was a formal established oompin with sharer,, formed in accordance with Austrian law. I Dwever, then hands of '. additions Orop had to pad rent for their seized tanks. 53 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 According to all our i ovoation SIM was under the orders of the relationship best spe culls to and there were mntinual visits ,free the control aeea fissions . Alter the ' did not enjoy the status of a juridical person in the eyes of Austrian law and was not even entered In the Comercial Aegister, the Austrian courts, nevertheless in practise, soon began to regard it as am, one which decided whether it would allow itself to be as defendant in a lawsuit. never did take part in a property suit property was a aOtter which the , rie d as having a collectiv{ or was not Qe n one decided practice# In everything elsee# Vii' Just simply ignored the Administration authorities. It thereto: event when *ad* applies - tion for a building p omit. seaweed to apply to the *upreae. Xining Authority# since it appear* that Dir.ctor sasera-l *fdo nko issued Order No. 4 which stated that the Authority was at lust to be kept informed of what going on. Production Director O&VUhuk, k no notice at all of this order. Production fist were kept secret and divulged to nobody,, not even the thority. Drilling Director Lovkin was equally cold to Order No. A. 54 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Lth exception of the not-too-clear Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 'r l r+al Direction and Its Divisions were divided into plants and su a-sidia r plants. This difference was not strong stressed in our "$p ezialbsrtoht t Organi satorischor Aufbsu der S owjetis chon Kineraloelvarwalt of the divisions ative post in the 111' was the D not 0 doeWesntation. der, it would appear not un10orftnt that a series of xis of important Soviet personalities which appeared to that report mould be substantiated in this one. r.cto7'4ene'ral (for technical of a --Diroetor (for eaw zero: . affairs) and of their representatives. Division nommm-ided the Divisions. The indi- plants in the oil fields and the refineries were under the orders of of the occation there were des in internal ce, for ssm* time there was a Labor its Division, Division. working regulations Division which took nc. Division was Our spec etc. This nee of the Accounting by the directives of the Director- 55 Divis such. There it ovsr-fulfill*entt, work 19570 if ire, the differences basis of available personal ponsible to the Director- absorbed by collective contracts, so for a time a Labor of juridicaal labor questions ipso absorbed by the Plans Division. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 General. The toll Getiletersia n Accounting Investments "Sal Housekeeping Personnel Plans Audit eologic al amtf aoturing fte tasks of de of the divisions The follows *me of table gives a grh, f . xpl*z*tory by their Cation thereof, However? let it be noted that the Secret Division, Ong other of desuaents,, instructions and correspondence between the Soviet authorities in Austria and in the Soviet Union. This Division was called Division occupied offices tantse. The windows of these room e tint floor of the ed and a Russian 10 VIW stood before the door, Personnel Director Zichniger and in his absence his deputy ;erbier r were the onl them. Even Russians needed a special p i loelees who could enter offices. With regard to the Plans Division it mph' be noted that according to our specialists,, those ply which affected the entirety of the administration were laid on by :Moscow. The following divisions listed below had their Lvtdual plans divisions. The plans they drafted 56 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 .{ ~ _; . 4Y, u Yl.,~-~ ~uor? 1'iOce 'ct?- L~ ' 1 ril - T ern. 8ecre Inver -Mecz t ?lcpi_ . i ~n k-a, :?:: of 1955 an As a result of wee iapr ov ee vents, ation returned to the Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 In 1947 M1t from existing furnae" a d apparatus a cracking i arUllation 0 4 in 1948 it had as capacity of 400 day-two. In 1950, the c truction of the refinery and the redistil- lation plant was ended and it was able to handle the bensin which had been sent to $chwichat for proe*"I g. Wining capacity 250 day-tons and that or redistillation 200. In 19P p*xforaa nc* eased through ?000 >ton taaatxee o* to 1,000 daaty..t'-ans of heating oil. A selective cracking process was also ins The production of sta was increased in 1952 through the erection of an inclined water pipe boiler the redistillation installation Zn 1954 transformed into a vacs installs.. tion for the production of bit ?i with a Mating oil us* of 150 day-tons. addition to this n 1954 the two Abe piped dating from the time of the Germans had eeapty# of tank and a second heating oil till to 1955 VIA tank 15,,E Cu. 25#000 am. a, a bensin p eline. To speed n st, a into operation. t at t s capacity was increased t of ineney invested by the soviets, but the sum when the Geraaaaaens re were a lubrication oil r* a tat fatty 108 d not appear intact at Voessndorf The distillation Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 and most of the reserv oil production rapacity was only dour not mention tiros pweriod. destroyed. Lubrication to 3bs.l Text uij ment Was twin away It e > d in 1946, the r finery's crude ail ospaoity was &gain 6,000 tons a month. In 1949 an unused rectification installation was changed into an atmospheric distillation in a crude oil capacity Increase to 12,000 tons a month. VP until oil (having no bensin or ps tro1. ) led saraat vasus install "Lan. But after the 1atsen oil field am* in orr tsen oil was handled and, latterly,, also gehoenkirebAn asphalt ray c . The two distillation installation are of the contiri aeus type,, tification installati+ : ri$es a bl ins r direst steam hisatingo oil,, the capacity of which 10000 tons in the period 1945 to 1950, acid process. is 014 . the sulphuric Voes orf produced heavy ben"A petrolo a and as oil as well as lubrication oil following table et sits in Yoessndorf s Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 1945 6200000 1947 1850000 1948 183*000 19,49 75*000 1950 *7,000 1951 364,E 1952 2*000 1953 149,000 900000 a total of 1< 2,057,000 figbomm Ban= (a) The origin built by the Inch. )*t of the of $is Bring Ore *r-Raker. capacity of t Y'A rot Ok to 1937 when it upplied by the firm 1944 wail Distillation 4. P"I refining 5. Cog 6. Lubrication QS -paeity of the Winery was p 8140) TO 70 40 ly nil du. to the 16 N arch 19 bombing and also d U* to the destructive action of t QOVN&M *gsin*t the in buildings and the boiler se. The tsians did no di l nt at the Nova refi t. During Us year 1945 the plant wor foLu d in captured tank 110 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 can and also with anglltrian oil. Towards the mid of 1945 1 ref; due to the do*W bridges. A tamers and to ! to the so- called waft emptied. After the bridges were until in 1947 two crude on pipel w and Toby and the refry, cause of a lack Of do. par with oil by water s all was peed into mtbe statt i o n where they oil we b in tank tr+ alrs into operation between tion it is Impossible what types of oil were brOught AW in what quantities. Wring the Soviet refinery aspw increased as follows t 1946 2 reservoirs of 5,000 . a. leach 2 n 20 5W 11 n 1947 Zrtabliskawnt of an asst ox with a monthly capacity of 500 e of the a etc distill ins t al. ation to about 600 1951 Modification of the ooking installation at one of the distillation units, giving a capacity of 19.53 ttion 0 onthe a lyand on the y a ids *Ise to to abut 7 The Modification work was by the Soviets and done ively with looted material and no attention was the w dimensions or to the right to side to about 111 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 size of motors, Ott, refinery is saddled with high repair tats and its ility is low. It is not mown how ch mon Soviets Invested in this ree inert' but it to estimated at about TOE 1111111,10n schi.llLTMO since do ntation concerning the about the Quantity of oil that the refinery worked prscti sever The type of products the Soviet Military ad>ssitnistx tiaon, bens importance. Heating oil was delivered from y 1945 to Blestrical Works at S msmring. ?.trolem and diesel oil from July 1945 to -n of lubricati oil of a lack of sulphuric acid,, etc. this oil was not of good quality. by little the quality of the products was ssade to conform and iraV q.ity resaaid below the (b) In 1945 when nothing is knmm pointed out the time at +s teity and over the years. t of this is we Lvov to xe 150 pipeline to thi Another 00 leading station was used for cools 947 and 1 cent: the harvests in. a in Jaly 1945. iiecause to year it rs sed one total length 2i600 a. so-called VOW Danube 1preline s to the Lobau between the so-called tilas a of 112 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 station nand the central. tank station, two 150 ones for petrolom. daily, seen production diesel oil. As the p material for of 1947 were s applies to the cost of At the a of the but they disappeared in 19 952 p whet the east was. The p Rk ed 120 tank trucks of its owns, (a) Zn 1953,E the central tank Oat with a new tank fillIft ore made out o nk station was di planned to have a won Installation was taken over by Nova in 1956. When the Russ ra left th~ they did take away or destroy al: Shortly a dry up to es um establishment of the a Oent a1 poientifle Res 113 Oil and 4; line 'Mid gm-10000 to" a day bens n or 950 tons it of looted Muaterial__ territory 8 subterx an tam and 6 above to fill, tank y of 1,,.50 0 tons. This away, but aaentation. a plan was Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 chief to be Professor 't,f ct *r' look 0"ftr all the work entailed in research and d1v 3.ops ntt in h the sass this idea did not talm toz'a the first place the available. had no good theoretical background I $ince the they had dlva Lab t*447 have a totol staff of 43, After the r n of the oil Indimtry with sbread Bch had bftM broken orttrlerj of i 78 1 di4 The 11f built 1952+ 194340 betwe*n the Lobsa storage 1 crier Oil lifts 680 a qt* lobau rot 7I7 SWUM loft 1 petroleus line, 717 eaters loft 1 gas Oil li lt,* 717 ast lli lonng Une that Is not in 114 ore long Specialists eatheaestic a s with them a central into ive the 7 MR or . Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 beret n g' 2 crude oil S ceMt ref 1 gas oil petroleum lines Ate maters long The Lob" to Lea a.d. Thaya line was interrupted at Auerathal and two donnecting lines laid3 one to the long-distance liras and the other to the Auersthal pump station, projected a long--distsn Auersthal to and to *oosbierbsum. The line to Korneuburg was contracted for but was not finished until the Austrians again took over. All railroad tank oars were declared by the Soviets to be booty since they bore the sign DR gt a) painted on this. Originally, they were administered by the military authot given the napber of cars they needed for ,,,w o- their operati ons , Those cars that were to supply the daareetic occupation area were rented to Orop. the remainder were used by JIM for its own purposes. The major portion of these can were in good condition but for part of them the Austrian national railroad authorities only gave permission for their use domestically, because of the touchy question of ownership. As already tioned, the cars were requisitioned without regard to the ownership or to nationality so that later? the Austrian car park contained a great nuseber of cars belonging to French and Italtan companies and also some that formerly belonged to Austrian, Inglish and American fi 115 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Of the Austrian fins Shell had a GM: Of those *to rye property the by $ s Crude oils the German ones from 1938 a SW had no tank ships. 5) only facilities that were requisitioned as being llowirig weres as Par as is known, taken over The DU facilities In smastedi, and those of the Austrian nil administration at the Zistersdort main station. White products t All storage installat,' the air tanks at Praterspi, at Lobau, ZOO the *ova the storage at lities at the P. ,ow plant, the former U station at Ibuthausen, all street filling stations in Soviet territory which were the property of the 'Y, Ga lin and Xitag firms. Heating oils the oil pools at Ladendorf and Ziersdorf. Of these installations those of l e-uthausen, ?#tsenkjrehen, Prater- spines and the street filling stations were rented by to Orop. Of those storage facilities administered by 8W* Lobau had a capacity of 160,000 cubic meters in subterranean tanks. Over and above this 11W had facilities amounting to 4,000 cubic meters in above-wound tanks. The Zistersdorf Main station had a capacity of 13?000 cubic but 5,0were destroyed by fire so that in 1955 Only 8,000 116 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 remained and were handed over to the Austrians. The *susiedl storage facilities amount to 12,504 cubic meters. The Ladendorf oil ppol had a capacity of 56,404 cubic actors and that of Ziersdorf, 132,000. They were in use until 1956, but in view of the lack of heating oil, had to be shut down. There was also a loading station at the I uckirchen railroad station, but it was dis- mantled. The Vii' opened up an unloading station at Matzen when the Matson fields were opened up. During the war there were shadow refineries at Spitz a . d . Donau.,, Lehen-8bersdorf, Tuernits, Petmrnkirchen, ltatsondorf, tuskirchsn and gbensee. In 1945 the installations at Spits Lehen.abersdorf, Tuernits and gtatzendort were dismantled. Those of ?*tzsnki,roh*n and Ifauskirahen continued to work for a short true, but then were dismantled. The ensee installation handled all the oil brought to Linz in tankers in May 1945. The GgggWjSM nt According to our sources the geophysical development was based only on reflected-seismic measurements . Other methods? such as the magnetic one, were not used. The seismic measurings that took place before October 1951 were sporadic and not very scientific in character. The mmasuroments were undertaken by two measuring teams, working with Soviet instruments. 117 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 With the arrival of the Soviet Geophysicist S. 0. huitalcov in October 1951, developmental operations were begun' along seismic lines. The work was carried out mainly in the Vienna Basin, with the exception of Aeewinkel in 1954. In 1952 there were three surveying to=* and in 1953 their n*ber was inc to tour Mtny experiments were methodically carried out. Besides the cur- rently popular reflection ^ethod1 attests were made with a system which registers the profiles in order to find the direction and angle of inclination. The method of mesa i the sound of explosions was also tried. In August 1953, geophysical exploration was suddenly abandoned, but recommenced in the spring of 1954 with the aid of two machines. Zn the fall, work again ceased. The seismic apparatus came from Russia. There were three ^a:chines . They were Type CC-24- and Type CC-26-51. Another apparatus was built in Austria In accordance with Russian plans. These apparatus are old foR and do not suffice today's Surrender e Am M On 13 August 1955 the ts. handed over to the Austrian Republic in accordance with the tease of the State Treaty. At that time the consisted oft 1 drilling plant 6 production plants and the rtnnersdorf Installation. { ,l gas plant 118 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 2 an { cospanies (Nathan and Pernga* 6 refineries 1 osocsrite plant 1 Lobau reservoir station with outbuildings and pipelines 7 auxiliary plants (workshops? building plants, laboratory, etc.) 1 tank coaepl?x formerly belonging to the Almmin onsol Associa- tion 1 central 1 Vasa aduldidstrati The chiefs o Director Pavlov,, Mi*f acce iel ov Director raretov, gales drew up for each plant an inventory of a eets, which., include the plant's ti, erp did not included on a second list, but was only quantitatively given and consisted mainly of materials. 1 enterprises and plants the" documents were signed between 8 and 12 o'clock. Austria was represented in each case by one of the our representatives appointed by the at of the final papers took place in Vienna at 2 o' clock and the entire complex passed into the hands of the ?*public. The soviets handed over (including XP4j,896 walls, whereof 673 were in production. (Attached table shams further details.) The average daily production from 1 January to 13 August 1955 want 9,65 tons oil Ct. ave. X,130#922 from 13 Augus 9,927 " " wet sam 119 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 1,009,674 cu. a. dry 937,84 " " wet lsrtylive drilling installations w ling turbines Of the 8!! and 10" 81ass. mlan drilling machinery usiedl and Med by the Soviets Drilling DIPM ref P'i Pipes for refineries 0heuiaals Deep well Ptomps Steels, sheet astal, Various drilling and teriel was stored no provi it would be The Austrian negotiators sod that for t intern period much of the materiel would be necessary obtaining it for 67,#000,000 schillings. river boats and a .70 buses* handed over, plus 20 drile ,,000 echillings i use at Bch. 18,000,000 24 ,000,000 2,,000 4,300,000 4,0800,0000 1, ,000 1,500,00"3 2,,000,,000 1*0008000 4,95000000 n stems,, etc. 5, 500r400 pant r this 4 that it had to be taken by the 8,,,000 e1 to be examined k rs,, loc motives, ,f at Lobau, 160 trucks and they finally succeeded in Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 The crude oil pipeline no estimated that they hand cubic meters of as. uF At six o'clock in the no, lies were in the plant* and 62g254 to 5s682 2,554 6,317 11,921 1.349 3,807 800 . long. Soviets as of oil and 36s 0,t ,,000 of 13 !August 1955, the following us diesl oil heating bi aviation gas `1'l iae s ac -rding tO w4WWell nt3 administration and tempo Fy administration. The handing over of heating oil was compensated suer Of Ike little time a cheek the lists submitted by the re were discrepancies in The following table gives a items 1) Unsuccessful dri' 2) Cost of aa-letre projects 3) Stocks to be liquidated 4) Pound 5) Dubious d s 6) major repairs tongs tankst if of the Soviet by the Austrian tin ail, bitumen and c plishod by 20 geptambsr 1955. e it had possible to It later became apparen sets that were I dsa of the* ly listed 51*81T*000 Bch. 982,000 1, 306,, 306,E 196,0 1!t ? ...... 4, 121 r77, Oil Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Piles covering the years up to I .fly 1955 were carted away by the Soviets frOU all plants. Originally they were to be assembled in the archives under Dr. grtericky. With the contained diva records of loam etc. directly In coms"sion consisting of yavlov, Chief Aceftntan took all these records Also dissolved gussians and in which archives were tares sw4y. office of the Central Tank A mil' a foreign crude documents. We do not know strasse rested offices we Off Vale their depeaaents, a Soviet at Wmv, Sal" Director iron Chief Yeralov boretr ss. 1. office, staffed by used. All files and the Central Control Alin t tion-mid the r ae that then* filer tied products disappeared. Por a time,, the archives .t Voes let declarsti be e o look at these an to the Tsbor- 1955. cords of rn lists did not tally with the qty inventory. 3 ecam" of haleste, the in practice,, however,, it be should have been there, were not available. 192 corning the Werksc its, the loll Division, mist rest hoes in Austria) ~t were was accepted t items that Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 lat air** through the a: show that a c of the directors to the Dire of Led for, a scavenger pro. All available dt a PUMP Fence would The forced to adopt t sally nsedsd was ok With t butt did not show on the inventory. There was therefore a differsnci bed wtha able Tribute deliveries 27 dust 1955? supposed to be avail- Soviet Union on of pressing problem that had to be solved the handing over of the onto Forty to 50 Soviet specialists had be "placed by Awstris ale, tihec ality a crude oil had to be improved be moved and the Supply of electric developed, etc. Steps they had thuds had to t for iats+sn had to be oly. . Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 AwrstAal 3,48 lul d-Ul 901 a& J-3i 11 1 - 17 91 3 26 - 120 1 4 0 1- -9-1-71 110 5 i ILA w ? ~41 r - UM w 1134 241 49 322 36 648 12 13 12 27 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 `I"`i'~l ?ST I IT9-1`r3 T`TTI~ .. .. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Third Section. 1. >: t A. z7t Along with the USIA Central Administration? the following adatnis trative posts comprised the administration of industrial plants in Austria: 1. Maarten: Minos. Iron production. 2. Podyonzniki Machine construction. 3. Autoveloa A utomotive 4. Zements Con struction, construction materials, glass industry. 5. llabelc Elec trical cable and Is industries 6. graska: Che mical industries. 7. Letexs Text ile and leather industries. 8. wkus: Food LO" I Agric and luxury industries. ulture, forestry, paper and wood Industries. In 1954 aka was amalgamated with Who. It is &I" possible that in the following year Autovelo was dissolved and taken aver by Zeawnt. Betve o t B. JgLery .mQ The development of the individual administrations seems not to have varied much. There were the following divisions: General Direction, Technical, or Plans Division; Personnel and Cultural Division mercial Division; Economic Division (Ache); Acco rating, and, there were, at different times, Legal divisions. 125 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 str purchasing and sales Wkus and Letex t into tom. tins which later were the following may be said of branches t Sanctioning of plant plans and supervial ti diviitons developed into ment; drafting of consumption and work nose; aid in supplying th plants with raw, auxiliary and other materiels; aid in the sale of of the production; organisation of the cooperation (finishing, exchange of machinery); the according of investswrnt credits; acceptance of the guarantee for credits of the 801 acceptance of losses and the covering of coats for the conservation of profits, taxes and tents 111 of tion of lants; c absolutely es examination of the doe Certain functions have not been subs ed by documentation but may be accepted as fact because of the form of the USA complex and based on a study of our papers "Soviet Plant Organization System" and "Analysis of the Soviet Balance Plan for Austrian atsrpriaes." Such functions were; Drafting of overall plans for production, supplies; the cutting of prime costs; d by on found in the plants. nn of production capacity; financing and profit accuwulationy drafting of reports, concerning the Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 of the higher offices# the c% through the intersod"ry of the advice and Plans plans (particularly the fulfil. ei 2. collaboration t f, offices (probably acceptance laboration of y and delivery undertakings). cy of VBU presents the following interesting wed out ea*ng administrations was nurtured necessary harmed in any way oh wheth and textile industries.) industry or those of the When any stupp from tA concerns my had to be obtained possible. The above demonstrates that Vil h ! a trade policy. The available docusentation and statistics do not wake it possible to determine what role the rentability princip this harmed 103 pests tions . a and the individual branch (For ex mple, it would be the VIA Retail chain had f thereby is meant the relation- ship of profit to capital. Of greater importance for the industrial policy is probably the principle of econamy (profit to cost or turnover). is is substan- tiated by the composition of., t tarsstla which makes it possible to Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 follow the development of cost, turnover and profit. Yinally it is noteworthy that after an 1952 1951 1952 1952 1952 1951 n rentability..-yin the most important branches between.-1951-52 and 1954. the USIA omplex was dis- solved after the 1955 State Treaty. Podyonik Autovelo label I label Letex Less dec 1954 1954 1954 1953 The considerable decline of to opinion, to the co var rentability was due, in our illation of the economic situation in Austria, 1. P.0 c. According to our statistics investments in MA Industries were extraordinarily little. Gross investments were 2, 3%, net investments were 1.7% of the turnover. It was therefore hardly han ?10 million schillings. It is not possible to discern the motives behind these investments from the documentation available to (Sse'aisos "Preliminary Report on the Use of the Statistical Listen ft Worthy of note is that the b in the year 1954. Available for this. the USIA Industries,," page 8). nude in VSU statistics give no clue as to the reason Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Marten 97,004,1 1,0 61,000,000 Podynik 3?2,000,0 2.5 22900008000 Kabel 1 39,400,000 0.9 25,000,E Kabel 2 411000, 3 1.4 290000,0000 Autovelo 35000110 1.3 25,000,000 Ze sent 72*000s000 2.2 59, 1,000 Kraska 40,000,000 0.8 21,000,000 Letex 112,000,,000 1.6 85,000,000 Loss 59#0000000 5.0 0000000 Wkus 242 - . 824,0001 17.6 612,000, 2. A. (a) ve According to he definitive estimates study of statistical qty*stlo: employ mailable through the Austrian a have arrived at the conch iderably mo of 36, 000,03K 0,000 a chi.lli n . This is cot Preliminary Draf of nd n that the IA turnover was in the order 25) which we 1 status of USIA turd on the value of money in 1955. t were arrived at through h study of the lists of 1 security offices, we h 1957 estimate, (See eared by third, in considera- t is a fact that the, examination he entire USIA complex does not furnish any assuming a particularly low rate, of productivity. With regard to our now estimate it should be noted that we settled the q scion of value with aid of the industrial price index. In the ISO Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 years 1951-55 the industrial price index was very stable, but has l ie value with regs to the years before that, Zatimation of the value also so for the year 1949. This is also a and that in the fact that a part of =U's d tic turnover was not calculated on the official pricy but rather on the" of the black Wit, which were appreciably higher. reason why the price i be put to unlimited use. said that our statistical questionnaires were only couple these answers which laid Taking these * aion that for the s based on official prices, i"anno' concerns and that it was for our new seta tte for all concerns. me into consideration,, one comm to the concl t 19 -1955 the minimal ova was around 27#000#000,0000 schillings and the maximal 36,000,000,000. The turnover of 36,000,000,000 was distributed sang the branches of USIA as followss Im9aft vex. 01955 basis 0brten 6,560 6,093,0000,000 Bchillins Podyotik 100,023 9e160,000,000 Kobel 3,746 4,616,0030,000 Autovelo 2,,146 1,,000,000 Zeuent 3, 589 ,000,0300 Letex 5,213 5s,325000000 gran ka 2,673,000,000 Lose Industries 1,146 50,0030?0000 Wk" 24-.. 4"Ei0 x.22 USIA Indudar'1es 36, 191 36,02$,000,0000 130 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 chine construction, mining and heavy industry (Ilk and the electre-industry were the most important parts complex. (b) MM.VU In our "Provisional textiles nt of the 3tatisticaI Questisnnsires," we have shorn that the branch** attained their grsatest output in 1952 or 1954. ars 1950 -51 were 1949 and 1952, d 1953 were crisis years for =U. The best 131. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 234- 35q- 7C ;1216 117 3747 r'r, 1117 112,, 1 10 71 1 1(,('0 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 (a) MMAUMMU 1"! ST ,343 3$ i0 Sul", lb* Nut p s (d) 5 CIO 154" h a of flow" -v iA* t1+>IIr' 1 333 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 134 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Ac itltn to okw Oat 19 pmt; at six e&ulen, .to by filler am Wtitl ,or v tiitp ow 17 ftowsmik 90W*000 0 Agt tto tsnt xr"ka Lt*x Le" C. ,004,E 18.0 ., 1,9a8 t **w M0000000 10.6 Sft*OW#000 2673,000 21,0 1l1.~J0O 17.6 UAA 4*3tv to the t Die*" t Vhdor it it L952 and 1954 that a big dip In d*U'w *tn Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 POd nik 157 36 #i tove1o 130 51 3$ 214 15 '8 10 45 Le" nu-.i w so 85 do nedtd 1933 but in 19!14 vory Y t#t se"t7 an whiah to tm" policy' in the pt ; L9, ntstz"atLiz (s) nip 5t X-t 4. *"tom a' 401 AD-, Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 2. Oar. 40 ,b. ofo> ,"ternoub W-5 "1a*. It. AqWd* &54 dates 1 6:, 093,c r, of s d dui of 257' Vario wt q 24,3 15.7 59-7 2XI .0 4$0,000,000 957,1 ? OOO 3#638#000#000 +l1+1111~ Iti1AW 6,093*000,000 117 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 0ynsaic o ison of turnover (esubliew on the mats of 257?60 0,000,000 Schilli s announced Year of the highest turnover 1952 'ear of the biggest turnover increase 1952 Increase of 47% over 1951 ear of the biggest to ver decrease 1953 Decrease of 900 over 1952. Indices for the finer of turnover (on the basis of announced 257,600,000,000 * hi .lings) in the y Deliveries tot 1951 Bast Bloc dch. 3?000,000 am 6,000,00 0 Divers Domestic 250000,0000 Indices of the decrease in 1953, 1952$ 1952 mange 21,,0000,000 4 617% 5,000?000 100 0000000 10 90 Deliveries tot last Bloc iah. B" Divers to B} ltiasted total Profit Bases for oft 1951 21?0000,,000 5,000,000 23000#000 000 1952 14,0001,000 8,00000000 19,,000?0000 ility (17.6%) Change 580 4 67% ?. 19% Profit structures ted on basis of 257#600#000 24h) Type of Profit s0nuziall. Profits paid in 4.9 000 Administration duet 7.8 475,0000, 0000 dales Tax 14.7 2"'0000,0000 Other taxes 1140000,a 0 0 Q _..~.., - 17.6 1,0 2,000,0000 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 P tic rentability $ of 257,600,000,000 Seth. Year of greatest turnover 1952 With 22.7% Year of greatest profit 1952 22.7% Year of greatest increase of r*htabil.ity (increus* as sma nst 1950 1951 " + 25-20 Lowest rentability 19514 14.E Greatest rentability drop 1953 50.3% the increase of 19511 2:2 Imressi Increases of profits Increase of smites u x Indices for the deer* of Dec A-in profit's Decrease of administration Decrease of sales tax 0 um mu po11, *ttiaated not invel investments General repairs ant to sanest Dynastic ci 1954. PJ of inv" 1.6 1.0 531 ,000 schiltings Ichillings 97,000,000 .Mvitznam 61,000,000 investment was in (b) Ana following plants were der " yomniac adai.nistrations 139 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 10 in, Pabrik t. se Atzg.r rt 2. O"ollsdaft t'uer +drsultk et.b.H., Wien X. 3. UrAs Ri dingsr oh# fabrik, Lifing. 4.' ,x I toren brik u. Xt Mlos terei AG, Wien X. 5. Xiesse n .Wsrks # 6. Os worlds r . & t nalt~eerks G.n.b.L. Wien U. 7. X t+er & dInberg L,.s.b.X* a Wien X. 8. ~ +erirr tis+ r l ,berlunge ko, It. Valentin and Wien. 9. TO"-und X #ljalARS k, Kotherr & lehr&ntz O.u.b.X, Wien 10. Toud ttr-Yo 11. wsagner*BAM AGO Wien d lil echinentabrik 12. Wr. Werkzeug Irs, h .nsnlabrik. Wien XX 13. Mu neni rik Pichler & Co. Wien XXX. 14. se lthn erkohromittel, , Wien X. 15. Wr. Lokmotiv AG. 16. Wr. Wien I. 2. X1k allv.r&rb,* t m.b.X. Wien-liebenhirten. 3. X rrste1der Netallworke AG, Xnzersf*1d4o snau Neurissenhot. 4. brik landwir cI tt1iehsr Xersete $e rnd trt Wilhelm Abt, A.n.b.X-. Wop nEler , Xlt,eee ee b Co., St. Veit s.d. 'rriesttng. Ventiletoren & x" ntentsbrik, lioedltng. tisenr, "r a. Winter's Ste,, Zj+enbe rg-erg. rgi. 10. Lsbeersdorter :shin 11. c -Work e l.et. b.l. k AS, 12. trndorter $ta1lear*nt'abrik, Werke s 14. Xteinted b It 140 V9 T, Aeatetten, ersdort. Poelten. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 15. J. X. Voith St. ft*ltalen. 16. Wr. eustaadter asoh nen rke Q?at.b.*. Wiener l stadt. 17. N-e csrmann ftbrik chemischer Graves , gittsrnberg bo Gars ae p. This aeetku a total of 33 pl tints, which in 1954 a total of 10*023 people on their p Wa11s. 2. Data contained in statistical questionnaires give the following concerting the perforelsnos of ftdjami r of plants Bch returned the qt couPleto Bales stractw? Do vored to c (Soviet various uestie worts to west in ! ra1N 64.2 9.8 23.8 100.0 Dynamic sales Year of Year of On 3#496#000000 1952 1952 Year of greatest sales decrease 1954 Indic** for the *&I" increase 141 17 9 8 stry a 9#160,300,000 sch1 of 2068600000000 $ch). $chtllings 2,881,000,000 x,000,000 2,,180,0 ?,000 . ` .O.4. 9,160,0000000 t 1951 4 4 t 1953 - 7O 2,686,000,0?0 sch.) in 1952: Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Deliveries to Ul of Met Bloc BWR ions Domestic U ports to West icee for sales dear+ a in 19' 1953 2,0!44?000 195$ change + 550 4 680 4 309 Total of East Bloc Various Domes tie RWR Exports to West R) BwAkUux Estimated total J; fits i Uh. 109,6000 ,, 17 278,ooo,a w 150 9000000000 ?~ 12% 45,000,000 90 ,,000 211000,0000 ;.1643% Profit structure (ca] atad on rentability (19,, ais of 3,496,000,0X sob.) TYPO $chiUings Profits paid in 6.3 57T#000#000 Administration 4uoo 8.2 751,000,400 gales tax 4.6 491,0 ,000 Trade tax 4.4 37,000,0 capital 0.0 Collection dues 1?786,000,000 Dynamic rentability co atris rs (based 3, 496,0 0000 * h. ) Year of the greatest sales rentability 1952 with 26.1% Year of the greatest profit 1952 " 26.1% Year of the greatest rentability increase (increase as against 1949) 1949 + 13$ Lowest rentability,., 1954 x Greatest decrease (as against 1952) 1953 >430 (decrease as against 1953 1951 1952 317,000,000 46,t ,,000 94,000,, 004 122, #x,400 142 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Xndices for rentability increase in 19491 1948 Increase in profits paid in i 4,000,000 Increased administration draws 15 000,0 0 Increased sales tax 3000*000 dices of rentability decrease in 1954* Decrease in pro., 0e*"&sed administration dues Decreased sales tax creased trade tax C) IMLINJIM ftui *stimsted net investments 29, 1949 Chance 17,,000,000 880 29 #,000, 930 7#000#000 131% 19?4 17,000,000 ,000 280000*000 24,000,000 2, Change -T2116 -930. -g3% %ofsales New invoo tuft-to General re Gross inveetn Amortization ante Net Investments Dynamic comparison of inv invi gchill ings 2#7,10000 302,000,000 229,000,000 954. (7.20 of sales, 42% of the total gross investment . D) Genera, Reefarenc - t In the years 1948 to 1952 one plant had to pay a "commission" out of profits to the Purchase and 3. We were able to gain an ice. (12-13% of "lea.) into two of the biggest plants which wore part of Fedyoanik through a study of plant methods. They 143 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 were W ray-.Biro (A s C plants) in Vienna and J. X. Voith of $t. Poeelten. (Ce area Report on the Conversation of 5 Dscamb r 1956," Report on C Plant of " t err- ro. versattons of 10 and 13 December 19%.") the sections of thee. reports so the, referred directly to the co According May - and June 1945. This was to on, of the machines Russian thesis, all t "pith production cNability was more a were to be taken whose A be absorbed by the Austrian market. The disasantlings were handled in both these plants by untrained troops, aided by plaint personnel. At Voith r s the untrained eps were replaced after a certain time by trained dia rnntling troops. Eaagner 4iro supplies ww* while at Voith only arse Incorporation into VIZA occux 1946 (c Plant on I Novembw U. The Adai nistratton duaers for both companies. At the beginning it 7 and 14 1956. " "Can- seem to have been the soma 10% of sala s, then 11.1% of production prime costs. But in 1954 they We diffomt and we hat the percentages were profits. original ro. disaantli the r+ev of oe in parted that according to the 144 according to the estimated any great quantity Waagner-dire on 1 December Voith on 16 April 1946). Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 the Rosslan drec `tc ? ) a Director feral, -a chief of chn'ical services (Chief engineer) and a chief of Administration. (chief Accountant). Individual Plans divisions were meted in both plants. Along with the bookkeeping division work. At Waagner iro, t Buoro for approval. The extensive plans and reporting on to the hessian plans a, particularly the balances, with all annexes, were sent by the Soviet rietul Director to the corresponding cos. V. The financi plants ran carried out along the lines contained in report "Analysis of the Soviet Balance Plan." V. The recipients of Waa rr ,ro and Voith products in the last Bloc are known. The exceptions are deliveries to Soviet Russia and deliveries an special order. ki done deliveries to the last Bloc stat had to have P+odyoanik's authoriza- tion. Bus. i'th the Soviet through the BSIA PUrchasAn (Central C erci-aal Office) was composed of 4 even direct Podyomni k, Office (gverkon) and through Wit. Vt. About 10 to 15 percent of Wangwr.Biro's needs in supplies were purchased through By 20 percent of Waagner.~ t Bloc states, Such imports included roller material, nick alloys, building and welding rods, hoist Mors, foundry raw material whereof raw iron and iron alloys the Soviet Union. 145 which was a part of in. pifteen to nto in such materials, Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 which were hard to get in Austria, were ordered on a q terly basis. V. After acceptance of the order by the Soviets, the transport usually was undertaken by Juschwneschtr a Deliveries to Poland am Romania went through the Uprose Wsagner-Ririe said that the following points were used for exports t Per Russia China Poland ,i C8x W-R (Waagner ire) (A investments were aid* or such as to bile park. in C .-Plant Bzeolav, Levies:, replacement say to lpleaant the f~nt investments were Maas in 1953 and particularly in 1954. In 1955 nor* than 1,0000#000 schil. lingo were spent to build a workingien'a clubhouse. In some cases the machinery that was delivered did not correspond to requirement*. U. At W-.B, the Soviets on of dredgers,' drug winches and corrugated iron hangars. At Voitr c s , the manufacture of spinning machines was nbroduced into the production schedule. W work norms were increased in 1953 &c tive of USIA. In general, however, At Voith, great stress was placed on forces. (Lack of specialists). reports by a representa- god of work was not touched. of available labor X. In both th*ro was a close cooperation with USIA exchange of plat and sub-contracts). According to W.1 IA had an organization which occupied itself with cooperation. (Perhaps the in*MW&d Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 technical divisiont) Each n nt h, the plants had to inform this co. operation organization i K eir operation desires. Cooperation plans were then formulated. Cooperation extended to different branches. The advantages ware e facilitation of fulfilling delivery dates, favorable prices and the exchange of necessary vachineery. 'here was also one general admonition and that was to sae to it that t materials etc. of other IA bra not lose sight of the fact that financial advantages. ('V'oitah) P~rrnt~a: ft.-'..tax The Soviet personnel ft* a/ in 19J47, Voith had eneral Di uirel cents in suppliees, raw were covered. One should also *operation want hand in hand w** by the USIA Administration. Already outstanding specialist. The Infiltration of Cnis is Into the plants was in the hands of three units which were ly under Co=WXiist influencer 1. The Factory Organisation. (Betriebsorganization - O) A committee of pure Communists belong; (Cmtnist col individual works divisions The Works Council which was imposed in accordance with the shop (plant) elections. 3. The Personnel Division which was staffed by ton-specialist Conist outsiders. With regard to the relationship of these divisions to the Soviet chide, Voith reports that the Co unists were able to push through 147 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 same of their wishes against central Personnel Office. brewer, kept In a plant by the Soviet plant r. the wishes of the C nista, even when such specialists happened to be foz er Nazis. Finally, the Cultural Division (W Comittee (Voith) played of mist Party ( wo etc.) (c) Askania t d airy specialist* could be it) o et leadership with the aid of the It the Cultural of the visits to the Skala 1. According to a source, the a.nistration of Autovelo was dissolved during the =U time and amalgamated with that of 2e snt. It has not been possible to check this report. It is curtain, however, that it was not very important since in 1949/50 the Qoerta Optical Works had been taken over by the Xabel administration. probable that the following were under the Autovelo administrations 1. Draeger 0.a.b.g. Viewna?XX. AL, Vienna X. 3. lash1er nd Xstallwarenfabrik Boll A Dr. 3trohachneider,, Vienna C. Rudolf Otte to run rk 6. Adolf Mickarl, bwersdorf. 7. " X" Of nbau Q.m.b.X. VI 8. dteyr d, G.is.b, X. Vienna XXI. r, Vienna X., and 9. P.C. Wagner JM* El. ktr*4 ch *isswerk, Vi U. 30. Vallechirokbau, Jose 148 , Vienna Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 3.1. liauihaber 8 co,, Vienna XY 12. O%wt fir, Vienna XV. Otto gborhard, Patrofenf$brik- Rirtsnberg, A total Of 13 pants, which in 1954 had a of 2,146 wow. The following data is availlabl, On their perfol"nool number of plants who reported 6 fully camp gLL*$tionneirea incomplete Total Autovelo sales* I sales struck oalculated on lingo. $ of 813,400#000 sohil]ings ) Deliveries to killings not Sloe 41 790?000,000 Hale 251, 000, 000 Various Domestic 45 868, Eo0;, 0 Exports to west 1 19,000,E000 Dynamic c ison of sales (on basis of 813,500,0 0 sehillings) t Year of highest sales Year of greatest sales develo Year of greatest "lea drop for the increase of in 1952. eveiuated 149 1952 1952 1953 Red on 813,500, cab.) Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Dsly r 1 1 3 ]no* am Yid Dametic his to W40t, 56,839 4450000 1952 73,991,700 C 30*20 +143-711% 4 10.6% 4, 87.E itcls for the 19531 Os3.trsries to$ 1952 1953 ChOW Total But XLOIC 73,991,700 29,3 '',1 251.80 25,39,800 95#013#00 < 1% BASOr" is 52,420,000 72,040,600 4 37.41 a) m 237,000,000 . PrOftt TV" r:oria asa 1.7 6,7 0000000 329,000,000 75,400, ,000,000 'sr Of hilt ulss Trir of 2restsst profit ear of grm tar ( sn 813,,5 ,000 s+ gulag) 1951 150 195-4 80 1954 0. T50 1951 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 1950 n 19541 increase in administration dues 9,,119,300 30?972,300 2T4,0,400 4, in paid profits 7 ,,004 2,,886, in b 44 Decrease in paid profits Decrease in administration dues 1953 0500 1951 2,501,500 - 32.M% ,,700 Decrease In ftass, Tax 5,7910800 D ecr e Tsr. New investments General tepairs Gross Znvestn en Amortization tents Not investments 1,732, M03#300 195,900 + 269.0% + 39-30 Ichillings 25,000,?00 MtM&00 359000#000 1QQ00Q 25,000,000 Highest gross investments were in 1954 with total of ich. 4,121,0 3. This is 28.5% of the to " investtaerint. No plant qu ntionaaires were fill (d) a.+ 1. The following plants came ti ter labels .nistrationi 1. Akowlatorenfabrik G.m.b.H. Liesing 2. pr^aht- and abelwerk Stchtermann G.a. b . i. Inz ersdorf 151 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 3. "Ceram" &. a. b. L. Ate era 4. Ar dne Draht-und X*b*Xw 5. 0 terr . Brown Boveri-ate Yien+ , Vienna XXX 6. Wr, Zabel nd $stallworke Ad 7. mi nion ektrimitta ots sellschaft Vi, 8. gismons oh uckertwer a O. at, b . C. Vie - I, 1a.n, die, Yiez 44isi 10. Optisehe Ansta t W. Goerts G.m.b,L. Vi va X This made a total of 10 plants which in 1954 had a payroll of 4,146. tical questionnaires we were able to take in the totality of the cable -producing industry. We have there. fore separated the evaluation from the rest of the electrical Industry. Mbar of plants which Clete qusstionrAdres , lete qu ationinaires Xstimated total sales of Ali 2,772,000,000 sahi.hlir s des structure (carted on the basis of 1,,500,000,000 itch.) Deliveries ihil1 ings Consignments against Soviet profit share 701,,,000,001 Responsible ac'tsinis 6.2 172?000? 0 00 (C 7.6 2110000j,000 last Bloc 00Gh0...0 40.2 114000,,,000 152 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 coat I di from RrgcgdjjA e Deliveries to % of Sales gch*illings 40. 1,114, 000,600 BWR 24.0 665,000,000 Various Domestic 35.2 976,000,000 Exports to W 0+ 17,0001000 100.0 2,772,000,000 Dynamic comparison of sales (based on 1,500,000,000 sch.) Year of highest sales 1952 Year of greatest sales development 1951 Year of greatest sales drop (compared with 1952) 1953 Indices for the sales increase in 1951 (based on indications given by firma having a totality of 70% of the sales). Deliveries tot 1950 1951 Change Bast Bloc 35,000#000 114,000,000 + 226% BWR 32,000#000 65,900,000 4 103% Various Domestic 56,000,000 dO,UU0,000 + 43% Indices for the drop in sales in 1953 (based on indications given by firsts having a totality of 70% of the sales). Deliveries tot 1952 1953 Change Totality of last bloc sales 116,000,000 120,000,000 4% BWR 81,000,000 31,000#000 - 161% Various Domestic 86,,000,000 50,000,000 - 72% Exports to West 7,000,000 .. B) Rentability Estimated total profit 56,000,000 sch. Profit structure (based on 1* billion sch.) 153 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Type of Profit % of l al Schilling* Paid profits 10.0 277,000,000 Administration tax 7.2 199, 000, 0?O Sales tax 4.2 115j,000#000 Capital tax 0.1 5,000,000 Collection dues 0.0 Other ois ?0 21.5 500000#000 Dynamic c+ parlson of rentability (based on billion sch). Year of highest sales rentability 1948 & 50 with 28% of highest absolute profit 1952 25% Year of greatest rentability increase 1948 + 47% (as against 1947) Lowest rentability 1953 with 17% Greatest drop 1953 47% Lidice* for rentability increase in 1948 (representative plants) Increase of paid profits of 1947, 2 million sch. to 10,700,000 sch. # 426 Increase of acinistration dares of 1947 Increase of sales, tax of 1947 4,600,000 sch. to 8,600,E sch. 4 86 10100,0000 it to 3,000,000 " Indices for rentability decrease in 1953. (Representative plants). 3 193 Decrease of paid profits of 1952 37,700,000 to 4,240,000 -.84oo Decrease of Adain, tax of 1952 22#100,0000 to 2;1?000,000 Decrease of sales tax of 1952 13,100,0? 0 to 14100,000 ,. 20 General remarks trade tax, vital tax, collection dues were introduced in 1948 for the first time. C) Investment policy Zstimated Not Invest sent 25,000,000 sch. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 $ of Miss Schilling* New investments 1.1 31sOOO,000 General Repairs RAI 842240-0 Gross investment 1.4 39OWsOOO Amortization payments Net Investment 0.9 25,0000000 yeic comparison of invesnts Greatest gross investment Lowest investment in 1949. D) EM With regards to 1954 (250 c f the total of investments -Sale* appear first in 1947, while appears first in 1952/53? There was a strong drop in deliveries to the East Bloc (incl in 1954 (. 77%) and partial re-conquering of the domestic erket ( 4 690 M SWAMI DIUM, Number of plants that Fully completed quest Incomplete plied to the questionnaires 5 VALqg.&g1j1 A) 4ales Ratimaeted total sales sch. Sal" structure (catc a ion of the induct: 2, Q45, OO0,000 n basis of 900,000,000 sch). 155 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 . Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Deliveries to Deliveries against Soviet part of profits Responsible administration R2$ BWR Rut Bloc Various domestic various countries (Rut hoc total a 34. 29.5 3.4 10.3 1.5 54.2 100.0 Dynamic comparison of sales (bsela.d on Year of higheet sales 1952 Year of highest scales develot. 1951 Year of greatest decrease 1954 Indices for the sales increase in 19511 to the Ras Various Domestic 1950 Bloc 4,8,0000,0000 60000 55.000 dices for the sales drop in 19541 1953 Total last Bloc deliveries 49,000?04 BWR 19,000,000 Various Domestic 64.094 B) Rentability: So" 000 603,000,000 70,000,000 211,000,000 31*000&000 1.0108,$0000000 2,045,000,000 1950 4 330 decrease a .nst 1953 - 23% 1951 Change 58,000,030 4 20% 6,004,000 + 7% 80,0 ,000 + 45% 1954 Change 26,000,000 - 88% 29#000#000 + 53% 51,000,0 00 Estimated total profits 368,0000,0000 sch. Profit structure (based on 900,#000#000 sch. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 kohi11 ings Paid profits 3.4 11000000000 Administration tax 6.5 133,400rOOO Sales tax 3.7 76, ,OOO cede tax 0.1 2,000,000 capital tax 0.0 Cc sction dues 0.0 Divers taxsl Total profit 18.0 368,c0,,t Dynamic reentabi Year of greatest level 1949 with 250 Year of greatest profit (absolute) 1952 180 Year of greatest rsntabil cannot be calculated Lowest rentability 1954 12% Greatest doe""* 1954 -420 Indic** of rentability increases Cannot be calcu1 tod. Indices for rentability der in paid profits ee in 1954 37' Decrease in admin. dues Decrease of sales tax Trade tax (Owerbestou*r) was company). being collected in 1946 (Osram The scree applies to the cap 0 Investment poitcys investment structure (900,000,000 ach. ) 157 the collection du". rah. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Ty" % of gal*0 8chillings New Inveetments 1. 30,700,000 General repairs 22% A t A ,, Gross investments 2.09 40,900, Amortization payments Net Investments 1. 28,600,000 Dynamic investment caena,rison= Highest gross investmenti D) General remarks # The optical industry has some peck sientative. idly, on, but pass Goertz Co. was under ' Meel a inistration in 1949 or 1950 because it produced som* electrical equipment. The Goertz sales development was unusually stable and from 1951 on was between 30-32 millions echillings a year. This net investment quota was around 30% higher than in the electrical industry. Sales to the east Bloc were extraordinarily high, being 69% of total "lea. Approx. 130 million *chilling*). It may therefore be concluded that tho Soviets placed special value on the products of the optical industry. A review was made of the biggest cable works, the Vienna Cable and Metal Works, Vienna. (Aidee of 20 sober 1956). The first review led to the elaboration of the "USIA plant questionnaire" and for the first time gave evidence of the existence of important original doc ntation (balance sheets, standard accounting fome# etc). 158 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 t reported final years # the leader' founded and that the plant was taken over by ?A. Prior to that the ocoup&- Lion authorities had taken a dismantled a part of the plant. raw materials air and also n dwn fluctuated between 2 and 10. and were paid to Kabol's administration. a USIA reegi m e,, the concern had 18 Gehierai Directors. of whom several appeared several tin", At the beginning the chiefs were military seen? but they were soon changed for civilians. The ship of the concern was cos - thr the thief Constructor and the Cowwrelal Director, (Chief Accountant). IV . Financing with the usual form alas credits for production material through , +eestment credits through the adm n, maintain the MR circuit able to the plants when on. It must be noted that in order to administration had to a eke credits xv4 cient. This is an 1946 s General Direct or# cation of how important isn't was consideeread. . Exports Via,, in part possession of "trans were only in " which did not contain the names of the purchaser. Price policy: for exports to could only charge prime cost plus 5%. All other contracts were calculated on western world market prices, Kbs 's administration had a say in the formulation of price policy, 159 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 nl 1. The following building and glass industry plants belonged to Zs*ent I Vie 1. I{einrioh Kohler, Vienna Dl 2. Union Baugeseellechaf"t ' -enns stberg 3. Union Bs aterisii ern CO- Vien 4. Allgesesine 8ta ssen a AG, Vienna 5. Allsomtne Bsuges. A. Por~r~yAG, Vierma X 6. Otto Outhan Yom. Anton Andereer, Vienna yew 7. Philipp R41 A, Vienna 8. Sager b Woornorp View* IV 9. giasf abriken OberdortU oitsberg1 Adolf Baerbitz, Vienna IY, XVI 1?. wiener Glashuettenwerke AG, Vien &9M ANUMS Deutsch-Oesterr. Christ Traiseruer 2. Brstte oesterr. letschiner tckfabrik J. Bggeiing, lssindu strie A$, Brunn am Gebirg e .a.b.R., Stockersu 4. aeosbr Lk J eb 5. O.sterr. Aebirge '1k ] bersp"cher, Brunn a. 6. Aktiengesel rb and Feinkersaik, Muenchen- $inztg Vio (formerly Wr. Ziegelwerks) i aopoldsdort 7. Aktiengesellschaft fuer Grob u. ?einkea k# l uenchen, Klein Foeechiarn biw.r t -fit 1. Granitwerke Ouson,, formerly Deutsche Bird - and $teinwerke 1. "VXDAG" Veereinigt Amiant AG, Rechnitz. abriken , formerly 16n Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 2. This makes a total of 19 (Translatoa a payroll of 3# 589 *MV 'a n 1954. Yillaret and Alois t 6t I Make it 20) plants with 2. The following be said of the perforaancee copi.sw espondedt 10 gtaestionnaires 4 6 ] va Mon? A) bL" ieaat*d total salelat 2,663,00O# 0 schillings, gales structure (based on Only domestic sales achUlings) t;ed on 376,000,000 schillingi Year of highest sales 1954 Year of greatest sales development 1953 Increase over 1952 4 1350 ear of greenest drop 1949 Decrease over 1948 - 23% Indices for sales Inter Domestic itch, of 376,,05000 000 1953 Change 65*0000000 41350 Indices for sales drop in 1949 (UN W on 376,000,000 sch.). 1948 1949 Domestic 000,000 - 239 Estimated total profits 282,000#000 sehilhings .em ernts of esti matiorn,e transmitted rentability figures (10.6%) Profit structure (calculated on basis of 376,000,000 *oh.) 161 ch,). Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Type Schillings paid profits 3.0 80,000,000 Administration dues 2.2 59000,000 Sales tax 5.2 138,000,000 Trade tax 0.2 5,#000 Capital tsar 0.0 Collection dues Other taxes 0.0 Total 10.6 282#000#000 Dynamic rentability comp rison (based 376#000#000 sch.) Year of highest sales rentability 1949 With 12.2% Year of highest profit (absolute) 1954 10.6% Year of greatest rentability incr as against 1948) 20.0% Lowest rentabili 1952 & 53 9.3% Greatest drop 1950 - 20.0% (drop against 1948) Indices for the changes a Fluctuations in the profit and sales tax. Payments by the firms are C) v?gi?t nt Policy Estimated Net Investment Z tion only eat nts and in Now Investments 2.1 56#000,000 General repairs 1 s9 Q 0 _. Gross Investments 2=7 72,000,000 Amortization payments 9.41 i .000 Net Investments 2.2 59,000,000 162 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Dynamic comparison of Investments Your of greatest gross invosta ante 1954. The report submitted on the Danube Shipping Company indicates that the Porr Construction Company oect investment system. This company for the Xorneeuburg wharf in 1951. concerning the glass coraar *nies, ed a central position in the the reconstruction plans are no interesting reports :plots reports show that in 1954 the exports to the Sast bloc were 6% of the total of exports and that exports to the western states considerably mere with 14%. The reminder of sales went to the do tic market. In 1954 the glass industry was still making c siderab a profits, In that year sales rentability was 2 while in 1955 It was 330. There were no plant rev ews . 1. As far as the into of Xraska are concerned, it is known that the general Directors were Strvnovich, Fadeef and Busheaarin. Some 15 Russians are said to have been employed in the Xraska administtion. At one time or another chief of the Plans Division and I*rosov, chief of the Technical Division. (Sae report on the Chemosan- ion AG, page 67.) The following firms were administered by Xraskaz Visr aR 1. Bekaacite Xurstharzfabrik, G.m.b.H. Vien - green 2. F. Beeiersdorf a Co. Q.m.b.X. Vienna X Chemische Pabrik Walleenfels, Vienna XXl Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 4. Chasische -abrik, V': 5. fora" er and Rinok 6. uygan O.m b.I 7. Remold 8. W. Megerie, view* 9. motich & 00.0 Vienna V tamwl Vie erke,, a.arcnn 10. Ferdinand *eh le na, Raa de Cologne und P f *aerisfabriks Vienna 1V .m.b.R~, 7ts~ XXX 12. + ~ iRem. Chm. G. m. b . r4 Vi 13. Gebr 1 t, Q.m.b.R o Atsger rf 14. Zl.dolw?rke, Siegel 6 Ca,, View* UX 15. YAr'gsungs Industrie AO, Vienna IV 16. Wither Wagner , now Guenther Wagner, Vevwaltungages ia. b.X. , Vienna X 17. V Vienna 18. Dr. A. Wonder& G.a.b.Lt., Vienna 1. Aktiengesellschaft fuer c hemis r "erIans dorf, Aieb hirteln e. Rannersdort, 2. csrbelinau -brtk, R. Axon rius, Aastetten 3? 4. urg 5, X.T. G1ettssawnn, Rabenitein a.d, lielach 6. 7. Oh sche Earbenfabrik R.N. 11abich? Welt#negg Spirt 9. Spirit tabrik looew# A ik# fernhoten Dr. Heins Berkel, A total of 27 plants which in 1954 had a payroll of 1,547 employees. 2. A study of the statistical questionnaires ohms that there were 13 plants which answered the qu stionnaires. Of the 13? tour were complete and nine were incomplete. ,, A.*., Voss+endort ,Ali Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 s UMMUM A) UJU Total sales of aka Bales structure (calculated Deliveries to tis $ of Sales 2 673,000,000 sch. 248,667,500 schillings). Schilling# Total of Bast bloc 50 1, 337000,000 BWR *0000000 Various domestic 4309,400,000 Other countries 2,673,000 Dynastic cosparl of sales (based on 248,667,500 $ ch. ) Year of the highest sales Year of the greatest sales development Year of the Indices for the inc Total of Zest bloc Bit Various Domestic Other countries drop in 19541 1953 7,869,600 362,00 15,808,200 800100 Indices for the drop in sales in 195 1954 1954 + 252.7$ 1953 - 13.10 1954 Change 69,477,,300 + 782.90 1,330,E + 267.4% 14,#1776#600 - 11,5% 84,400 + 3.40 1952 1953 Change Total of zest Bloc 11,613,600 7,869,600 - 47.6% BWR 3624,000 Various Domestic 15*585*200 15,808,200 + 1. other countries 87, 300 80,100 + 9.0% B) nt&)4 .iti Estimated total profit 588,000,000 8tah. Profit structure (bsus.d on 248,667,,500 Bch.) Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 0 of Sales Schillings Paid in profit 8,4 225,000,000 Administrative tax 9.0 240,000,000 Sales tax 4.2 Other taxes 112,000,000 22.0 Dynamic rentability corist 588,004,000 Year of highest sales 1947 33% Year of greatest profit 1954 22% Year of greatest rentability increse 1954 + 29% Lowest rentability 1953 17% Greatest decrease in rentability 1952 .. -24% Indices for rentability increase in 19541 1953 1954 Change Paid profits 858,304 2,062,900 + 140.3$ Admin. dues 1,681,400 11,876,800 + 606.3% dales tax 1,189,500 4,284,000 4 260.2.6 Other taxes 3TT*400 865,400 4 129.3% indices for rentability decline 19521 1951 1952 Change Paid profits 2,833,E 1,630,900 - 73.7% Admin. dues 1,505,900 2,192,900 + 45.6% Sales tax 806,400 .344,600 + 66.7% Other taxes 433,200 528,704 + 22.0% C) vet n Po c Only insufficient data ar available on the investment policy. 3. Only one ill plant, the Kiosterneuburg plant of Chemosan- Union AG was examined. (Total sales d ing the =U regime; 57, 000, 000 *ch.) The result therefore has no over-all significance!- ,I mac Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 There was no dismantling. The plant was placed originally under military administration and taken over by USIA on 1 July 1946. It. The plant is said not to have made profit payments, but only to have paid administration dues. This is contrast to all other plants under Kraaka. IM. The Soviet Directors # neral of the plant were often also directors general of other plants (usually at two others). Annual production plans had to be examined by the chief of the Plans Division of Zraska. The plan calculation foraalas were the same as used in other branches. IV. Financing was s V. It is interesting to note that distribution was carried out by the central office which was located in the British Zone and there' fors not under the USIA administration. VI. According to the report Kraska obtained raw materials, such as alcohol, at extremely favorable prices. VU. Does not a ply? V',. There were practi C. The Soviets forced pharmaceuticals to cosmetics. investments. (30,722 schillings action to switch from that of X. Cooperation was limited to an exchange of machines and to purchasing when possible from USIA plants. The plant council was under Soviet leadership, although the Socialists were equally strongly represented. The Personnel Division, 167 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 the "DO" and the Cultural Diflsion were staffed entirely by Communists. Even when IA was liquidated the C tun'' Its were able to a intsin their position in the October plant elections, whereas the Socialists lost one mandate to the bdependonts, 1. A certain iaf v atioen' is WnOwn about ietex, known in German as Light Industry ( chtil trie). the report on the Alt-Erlaasr Dye Wor the following Soviet Directors General T were named t Utkin, lkltsev,, Laptev, Chernobiulski, Alexandrov, Xbrosov. The name Utkin, as chief of Latex is also mentioned by Dr. X. (see Report on the Conversation of 13 and 20 December- 1956). The name Alexandrov, alias flach n# also appears in the Special Report on the USIA firms, Wkus, Lotex, ort was there in the year 1951. Chernobillski is probably identical with the man of the same Howe mentioned in "Report on two conversations with Dr. $eleeknwitach of Barthel & Co." Chekamasav, Ougoryov and L*bedeb were mentioned as chiefs of the technical or plans division. Sokolov and Chirin were mentioned as chiefs of the F rrsonnel Divt*on. From an organizatory point of view the significant development of the trade division is well known. Betides the usual import and export mechanism it dove; taken over by Ort. retail trade chain which, in 1954, was The following firms were under Latex 4dainistx tione 168 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 1. Zdelgarnspinnerei Aau dern & Co., Vienna-Atxsgersdorf 2. Atzgex'sdorter asec anixche Weberei, Edmund Isllner, Atzgersdorf, 3. Bruno Georg Wunderlich, Vienna XXI Carl BudisEchofsky & loehne Oesterr. Lederindustrte, Vienna XXI Lederw erke Q er ssardus KG, Vienna XX 6. dtadlauaer 7. 1k Budischofsky nrad-Zeller, Vienna M Vereinigte Li edertaabriken A*, Vienna XX Texti..ldruckarat J. Xsuel, Vienna4tesing IMOX A,tM 1. August Xhrlich, T'extilwerke In, Trumaut/Aspsngbahn 2. ,rate oesterr. 4lanutoffabrik, at. Poelten Boetzendorfer aechau i sohs Weberei M. Plobner, Goetzendort 4. Mine Janis ch, T tiai.saagrtuer 5. Paul Xollbach X1. Neu siedl 6. Theodor *a.1ler (.haa. Xeidlhuber) Trutaau 7. Wollwarenfabrik Brlach Q. s. b .fit. 8. Vereinigte Textilworke Barthel & Co. ,p Woellersdorf 9. C.A. and Paul Vorsteher, benstein at. d. Pielach 10. Weissenbacher mach. Leinen-uund Baue*cellwarennreberei, Oskar 8unza, Weisesenbsch, Triesting 11. Wr. Neustaeedt*r $trickeretfabrik Paul $eyer, Wr. Neustadt 12. Prsmz Schmitt AG flier Lederindustrie, Rehberg b. Krems 13. Alt-Nrlasaer Faerbera4 u. Appretur AG, Erlas 14. Richard Holtkott, Wr. Linoloun-und Wachstuchwrerke, T'raiskirehen, Brunn am Gebirge 15. Knopf?und Wadler ren,, Ketten-und Bolzwarenfabrik, William Pry,, Weiesenbach s.d. Triesting 16. Pottachacher mach. Weberei, Pottschach Altogether 24 plants with a payroll of 5,213 in 1954. According to our statistical questior 11 plants turned in reports, 4 were complete and 7 incomplete. 169 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 __gl 'eons A) Estimated "lost 5,024#000 schillings. Bales structure (calculated on a basis of 594,000,400 schillings). 1e ? v?e'te t Of 1161.02 ASUIUMI East Bloc 44 2043000 BWR 23.7 1,261,000 Various domestic 32 1,704,000 Exports to West ~0 16000 100. 5,324,000 Dynamic comparison of sales (on basis of 863,000,00 0 Bch)* Year of highest sales 1952, Year of greatest sales development 1948 increase against 1947 + 193% 1951 1950 4 53% Year of biggest ealee drop 1953 decrease 1952 - 9% Indices for sales increase in year 1948e Deliveries to 1947 1948 Change East Bloc 3,000,000 10,000,000 + 209% Bw'E 800,000 4,000,000 + 4400 Chief factor for the sales increase is the fact that the Eriaaer Dye Works became part of =IA as of 1 December 1947. Indices for sales drop in 19531 Deliveries to 1952 1953 Change East Bloc 66,000?000 6,000,000 -1018% 19,000,000 16,000, 000 - 16% Various domestic 10,000,000 70,000,000 + 580% a) k ntetbility Estimated total profits 1,251,000,000 Basis for esti tet transmitted rentability (23.50). Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Profit structure (calculated on basis of 863 million schillings). Type % of gales Schilling* Paid profi ws 3.4 181,000,000 Admire dues 15.7 836,000,000 Salon tax 4.0 213,000,000 Trade tax 0.2 11,000,000 Capital tax 0.1 5,000,000 Collection dues 0.0 Various profit taxes ? 0-1 ~,, IMM 23,5 1,251,000,000 Dynamic comparison of rentability (based on 863 million $ch.) Year of greatest sales rentability Year of greatest profit Year of greatest rentability increase 1950 1952 1948 with 31% 29% 4 37% (against 1947) Lowest rentability 1954 with 37% Year of greatest rentability decrease (decrease against 1953) Indices for rentability increase in 19481 1947 1948 Change Increase of paid profit 0#783 1,386 + 77% Increase of admin. dues 3,011 13.005 + 333% Increase of sales tax 0,416 1,463 + 252% (Translator's Notet Original omits to say these figures are millions or thousands. PPestssably millions) Indices for increase of rentability in 19541 1953 1954 Change Increase of paid pr -fit 6,000,000 8,050,000 + 270 Decrease in admin. dues 14,000,000 7,000,000 - 104 Increase in sales tax 6,t ?000 6,ooo,040 } C) RdLex Estimated net investment 85 million schillings 171 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Investment structure (based on 863 million *chilling). Type % of Sales Schillings New investment 1.7 91,000,000 General repairs 9 21 SGQ Gross investment 2.1 112,000,000 Amortization payments 27,6000.000 Net investment 1.6 85,000,000 Year of the highest gross inveetmentt 1954 Examination of plants was carried out at two enterprises, Barthel & Co. and AltwErlaser,Faerberei-und Apprettxs AG. 1. Thera are no indications of any dismantling. The Pserberei was taken over by USIA on 1 December 1947 and Barthel in June 1946. 11. Barthel. report says that in 1947 administration dues were 5 percent and then were reduced. At the Faerberei in 1950 the dues were 11.3 of the prime cost of production. In 1955 both enterprises reported that administration dues were 1.07% of sales. 17.X. The reports do not indicate whether there were also Soviet administration teams in the textile business. Military personnel was in the Yaerberei plant until 1950 and until 1948 in the Barthel plant. Then, with one exception, there followed a series of technical person- net (weavers, chemists, etc.) In part,, the directors filled more than one post. The plans, which were presented more or less in completed form in photostat., were drafted under strong influence by Letex. IV. Financing followed the habitual system. The Alt-Erl+eraer acre- port shows that the Soviet Military Bank charged a 2* percent Inter*st, 172 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 for credits for the acquisition of raw materials. This has been otherwise confirmed. V. Juschwneschtrans and the Hartung Express Co. were used for deliveries to last Germany. VI. Procurement was carried out partly through Letex and p*tly through M. V11. See V. VIII. No expansion investments appear to have been made. U. The major part of the woven materials appear to have been destined for the Soviet Union (Clothes, bed linen). During the Soviet regime the plants work at capacity on three shifts whereas only two shifts were habitual in Austria, The were changes in the norms. X. Collaboration took three formst 1. The amalgamation of plants. Faerberei was amalgamated with a textile printing plant in 1950. Weberei took over another plant, Gernert & Co. as a. subsidiary plant. 2. Automobile parks were equalized. Close connection between USIA sources of materials, in part/ through Letex. XI, In the Alt-lilac plant there were the following Communist organizations: Personnel division 's and the plant council. Barthel & Co. reports that the Ceamwtniots have lost 500 in the plant council*, 173 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 (h) I "D 1. Here, only the Less industries are discussed while the land and forestry sections are dealt with in a separate place. The following were under Lose administration# 1. Austria Holswarenfa"brik A*, Oberpiesting. 2. Beckmann & Lochner, *rbach,/ kenau. Carl Gaspers, S'chwadorfer Saegewerk, Schwadorf bei St. Poelten. 4. Klosterneuburger lsindustrie G.m.b.H. Klosterneuburg. 5. Stephansdach G.m.b.H. it. Aegid an Neuwald. 6. draupappenfabrik Josef Greinert, Aspeng. 7. Zehmbacher Rolsatoff-end Pappenfabrik, Willi Neubert, Zahnbach. Burgenland, 1. Sehilfrohrverwertung Gebr *zeller OID lteusiedi am Bee. MM.t r 1. Groellwitz Obermuehl G.m.b.H., Obermuehl b, Rohrbach. This makes a total of nine plants with a payroll of 1,146 in 1954* 2. Our statistical questionnaires show the following Seven plants answered them* Pour were complete and three in- complete. A) MI" Total sale* $ 1,150,,1 ,000 schg llings No analysis was possible since for 80 percent of reported sales there was no organization. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Dynamic rentability comparison (based on 253,661,000 schillings). Year of highest sales 1953 Year of greatest sales development 1948 + 99.3% Year of biggest sales drop 1952 16.67% (1952 a 100) 1) Ratability Estimated total profit: 202 million schillings Profit structure (based on 253,700,000 schillings). Type % of Sales Rchillings Paid profit 6.7 77000, 0?0 Admin. tax 6.6 76,000,000 Sales tax 4.2 49,000,000 Trade tax - Capital tax 17.6 202,000,000 Dynamic rentability comparison (based on 253,700,000 sahillings). Year of highest sales rentability 1951 27% Year of highest profits 1951 Year of greatest rentability increase 1954 +122% Lowest rentability 1953 9% Greatest drop in rentability 1952 - 93% Indices for the rentability increase in 19541 1953 1954 Change Increase in paid profits 434,000 2#943#000 + 578% Admin. tax 1?253,000 3*223,000 + 157% Sales tax 2,0900000 la985#000 50 Other taxes 14*200 14,.200 .. Indices for the drop of rentability in 19521 175 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Paid profit Admin. tax Salsa tax Other taxes C) v t ax-Icy 1951 5,213,000 #291#000 1,582,000 22 s 000 1952 141,000 3s007s000 1,690,000 15,400 Change (-3797%) - 9.4% + 2.3% .. 46.1% Estimated not investments 58 million sch. Investment structure (based on 253,700,000 schillings). Type % of Saes Schilling, New investments 4.3 50,000,000 General repairs 9_Opp ~illi.\~I11 A__ .i. ~r Gross investments 5.1 590000,000 Amortization tents 1000000 Net investments 5.0 58,000,000 Highest gross investment was in 1954 with 4.986,500 ^chi naaeely, 38.90 of the total gross Investment- Along with the two saw mills, the two paper mills were probably of interest. No review of the plants. 1. The W o s industries, in contrast to their retail organi- sations, had no particular importance. The administration comprised the following Plants t 1. Prasn+ck u. Zsthroiner, . m. b. . , VI* w* XI.. 2. "-brtle" M-lsfabrik Dr sdubl,e lehw*chst. 176 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 4. $eisse & Co.-, Vienna X. 5, Spiritus-und Presshefe-u Likoerfabrik 10 W'olfrulm? $tadlau. Siemens irotfabrik, Liebich Is Co., Vienna I=. 7. Oesterr. Unilever, Vienna XXM and XX1. m &morl 1. Friedrich Xarm Kunstmwtshle, Oailneukirchen u. Alberndorf. owes Au t e 1. Brucker Zuckerfabrik, Clemens Auer IN., Sruck +eitha. 2. Dr. A. Oetker O N#* Baden. 3. Ing. Walter Schoen, Angern IT. This made a total of 11 plants with a payroll of 2121 in 1954. 2. As the result of incomplete data it in not possible to give a rounded picture of these plants' activities. However, it is believed they did not deliver anything to Russia or to the East Bloc. The sales rentability was about 23%. Only in the sugar industry and in the alcohol and brandy production were sales of any importance. (The Wolfram plant reported sales totaling 259#500#000 schillings during the QUA tim-ae. In the alcohol and brandy production., 90% of sales were through XWR , that is to organisations, through other A There were no reviews of plants. As far as the retail organi- zations of are concerned, there is a report entitled "Special report on the =A Trade lane,, Wkua, Letex,, Ort. ") 177 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Xl. t DAMMAM No hard and fast results have been obtained in the inquiry into the USIA land and forestry enterprises. The inquiry was begun a short time ago. It =wst therefore be surmised that the partial results presented here wil undergo modifications as the inquiry proceeds. Il v l t is t o At the and of the war action in 1945 the great eestates, whoa. owners had fled before the oncoming R ssians, were taken over and ad inistered by coal missars who were subordinate to the Soviet kfl mmeand$tur. Following publication of the so-called i rasov Order (*e Wien NEW v 6 duly 1946) the land to in the gist occupation zone was taken over by throe-part divisions which were set up for the purpose. Land and forestry was, at first;, haphasardly pulled together under the Estates Direction, the leaders of which were subordinate to a csntgal office in Vienna. This central office which was called "Less" after the R *sian initials of its name become a part of USIA adald nistration. Less tee: Soviet Administration for the Wood Uftstry and Agriculture. The initial 30-40 estate* directions were gradually tightened up and finallyo 12 estates directions were formed out of this, The chiefs were called motors Sen. Until ea r eere around the end of 1946 saetre on the to requisitioned east ate... did pretty coach as they me d . duet went almost exalusiv*ly to the. occupation troops. With the, feretion and de volopsesnt of L 4w* the guiding principles of this branch of the planned 178 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 economy was Made to apply to the occupied zone. Within two years the total ineptitude of the kolkhose methods Imported from Russia became plain. Nearly all the estates were heavily in debt. Therefore, in the fall of 1948 the Soviets attempted to lease land to mall farmers who were being fed with stories by the a about the "land hunger of the proletariat." But there was little demand for this land and this obliged the Soviets to try another tack. In the fall of 1949 they tried to get big farmers interested who, according to the Soviet idea,, were men who could take over parcels of at last 50 hectares or when possible one entire estate. From this time on the Soviet directors general United themselves to supervision of the leased lands and to looking after the forest and wine lands which in general were not leased out. In 1951 the RPOe land organisations, working through the Communist front organization League of Small Farmers, attempted in certain areas to push the distribution of land to small lessees. This led some directors general to try to take land away from the bigger lessees despite their current contracts ate: to give them thus to Party faithful. Novertheloss, the Soviet policy of leasing the Uvad in large parcels remained in force up to the 2. A. f w* located at `IM 1', divided Into the following diviSIMM 179 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 _ , _,A t al ief ? His mission was liaison with the cor- responding ministries in ibscows Liaison with the Chief of IA; supervision of the 12 directors general. e'~- xuawkin (until 1948) S J rnov ( tr 1953) Avtayev ( r- end of 1954) Not sown (until August 1955) c e sign the countersigning of all plans; central bookkeeping for the directors general; psyment of profits through supplementary understandings with the plants; calculation office for the plans depart- ment; drafting of all tasks in the individual plants; training of the Austrian booleepers, 8tru v (until 1951) doprativnov (until 19! luri nev (until August t of the annual plans wo,od cutting# seeding the subdivision of the annual pin into q"rta-ly ones; profit ping-profits could neither exceed Or t" of t 180 re out of the amortization led for by the plan; be cut. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Mgrv Fuschnov (an outstanding technician) Others unknown Cotm a Ec ial .9 9s' It was a subdivision of the XZB (Central Commercial Bureau). Tasks were: liaison with the Soviet Military Bank; transmission of delivery contracts to the Director General; determination of production costs, profits, delivery time, all factors which had to be transmitted to the Director Oener*li supervision of the internal book- keeping office. F v t It. tasks were collaboration with USIA 's Pe division in the Trattnerhof j control of the specialized personnel on the es testes j training Austrian Communists to handle tractors and to become Overseers and milkers; establishment of agrarian schools and setting up training tresses; Ceseestani,st propaganda Ong the workers yetis on the estates; negotiations with the Austrian labor unions; admeeinistratton of the F.V.S.R. fund out of which social benefits were paid for the employees. aprlr4Pr (Ai tr sm mil ( stream unt t l 55) . as Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 .eaatael pivasa-i pna Tasks were; determination of what was "German propertyj" conclusion of leasing contracts; attempt to trans- for property of requisitioned property to the occupation authorities] the collection of claims by requisitioned properties in other Austrian and German occupied zones j negotiations over frozen bank credits. P j OWLS Name of the Russian lawyer is not known. Austrian lawyer was Dr. Siegfried Lehi,,, now in Linz, KPOs member. Acba nintraetW.1 tion. Ch ial Not known. B. Was gf $ was a subdivision of the U8IA main acdministra- tion o th WaIll recto jea The so-called general directorates comprised the agricultural estates directorships. They were: Allentstsig (Lower Austria) with the installations; Ludwig Lassarini Anton Ma Zacharias Prank ( dwigothal) Deutsche Ansiedlutn ess-Uschaft ches Retch, Rsichsfueeha , (Resettling) ktsches Reich. A9119 Truppenaebumiaep Sts Doe srsh.tm) Beer Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Angern - liarkgrafneusiedl (Lower Austria), with installations Angern Rohsnauernhardsthal Dressing.-Bi chhern Duernkmt Coburg J t$an PUM Berg KarkgrafneusLedl Raasdorf Vntersiebenbrunn Lasses Mruerbach Qpfenreuth Bis+ erg Theresienfeld Ratseisdorf gottingbrunn Qberwalterodorf Schoenau Aspang (Lower Austria), with installat.ionss Aspangerhof and Noenichkirchen giegersberg Wiesssth Qraupsppenfabrik Aspang (Formerly F. Qreinert) Clewing (Rohr is Qebirge) (Lower Austria), with it allstionsx Clewing (Gut wegscheidhof) Ballestree Vrg*rsbach 3isengewerkschatt Raysrbach.e rsu Risvnstadt (genland) This Soviet general directorship coisprised the estates of the gungarian citizen Prince Ztterh"sy. The Soviets took the standpoint that the Prince had been dispossessed by the Hungarian Republic and that therefore his property in Austria sat be considered as being psrian state property. Although the Austrian government did not r ecegnise this Soviet point of view, the $Ovi*ts requisitioned the Rsterhaasy estates with the initial excuse that they were necessary to ensure the supply of food for the Soviet troops in Austria. Later they maintained that the property belonged to the Hungarian state and 103 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 that any profits should be paid over to the Hungarians. Q..tr inquiry into this coaplex is just beginning. Brnstbrunn (Lower Austria)* with installationst y'uerst Reuss i Doaaeme Ernatbrunn Deutsche Anaiedlingsgesellschaft Ladendort $i.derleis ]thhof, Q.a.b Qaresanna and Aaparn aya (istat. directorship Ratibor) Gaming (Lower Austria), with the installationst Seuaenst.in-h.ithof $alerberg Auhof Ateinwandleiten Tannel. Yoeltendoerf (drill place Dingelberg G tettenhof Horghof Gine.lberg ansau ein-ftechlarn Qiselhot 1slheia *hierhoefen Ob.rhof sgerhof gcharerhot Zie lhof Ktnterhah 3erging Weissenburg un d Plankenstei n Nor. Lshenhof Grrafenegg (Lower Austria), with Grafenogg fineiue-rf Laengenfeld Greinburg (tin a.d+ Porstbrie iert Neot~btterskhof 18k tallationit furcher Tu rborg Austria),, with the ins tallation e s Raiff Re allor etrg Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Arndorf Planke nstein IItttsx arnsdorf lsrlstetten Bagenberg Irkt lis (enland), with the following installations: Deutsche Ansiedlingsgaselisahsit, with the estates t Bujahof 3Itrkt Rodin Xohfidisch Pinkiafeid and Grafenschachsn Unte schuetzen Rauchsart Woifau Goberiing gtefanshaf Zu berbach Qestsrreichischs Bundosforate with: fts!~Vx"Is Alt Nodis Pinkafold Ooberling Rorsdort Prinz P riz von Bayern (Ouster X11 and Bildsin) 'ennersdorf (Walter wing) *srksnstein (lxawer Austria), with nations, 3 srk nstein (fox tr3,y p AM Oestsrrsichiaohs nd?sforrts Lrendert - ,th (Out XI*In4 ,rtasca12 ) Wangg"ky (Out girc hatsig) 3 r a-hof ( Arens Riadi A. 1Re1#3bis" mm..leer de$ge s~slevsr }tong i $ssg.werk r (koilsn t) 185 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Pronsburg (Lower Austria),, with the installationsa Irons burg S'attau Zogelsdorf Walkenstein (at that time estate of the Geram Stift) As the above shows the Soviet general directorships were regional conglomerations of estates, forestry enterprises or The general directorship was ed vainly of the director general who was always a Soviet guasian. NO was appointed or dis- charged by the chief of the Less main administration. After the year 1950 the Soviet general directors were usually specialists, like Director General Antonov of Anspang, and undoubtedly cote from the Moscow *inistry of Agriculture or like the General Director of Zrnstbrunn (name unknown) who was the former chief of a big Sovkhose in the Ukraine. Tice second most important man was the chief book- keeper who nearly always was an Austrian. He was Bequently the book- keeper of the biggest estate. Qmart*r or half yearly he was given five-day courses at the less main bookkeeping department. to that the two could understand each other there was usually an interpreter, usually the citizen of a southeastern state. As has already been said the present state of the inquiry into this branch does not enable us to sad' a great deal about the Soviet concept of it. rk has yet been done on Wien Blot because of the lack of time. 186 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Reearks on the sales, rentability and investment policy of Wien Film may be found on pages 36 to 40 of the report "Preliminary report an the exploitation of the statistical questionnaires for USIA Plantso" of November 1957. Fourth Section, Nip until 1938 the shares of the first Danube Shipping Company were split up as followsa 26.173% belonged to the Austrian State 24.54+# it Creditanatalt-Dankverein 0.762% various Austrian ownership 46.296% private Italian or banking ownership 0.028% various German ownership As a result of the events of 1938 the part belonging to the Austrian State was taken over by the Ger Reich while the parts bs-- longing to the Creditanstalt and to the Italians were bought by A4 Hermann Goering-Reichaewerks. The result was that by 1939 the Reiahswerke was in pos ossion, for all practical pur es,r of 99.675% of the shares. The situation unchanged until war a a end. After the end of the war the DIG was carried on by a state-appointed director, fir, who had been Viral Director of DIC All along. h 19the Soviets took over control of the shipping and docks in their acne and until June 1945 rain their buses from the building of the D, h 187 Zone. As tha result of a Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 difference of opinion between the two occupying powers, the Soviets left the DSC building and built their own in the second district, at Tabarstrasse 2 4a,.the Soviet Administration of the First Danube Shipping Company. The port Installations,, the wharf at Korneuberg and all available E shipping we~placed under this administration. For all practical purposes this meant that the J AC was in Soviet hands. The building of the General Directorship and a few employees rem,i. in Western hands as a symbolic remainder, the most important part of DU was the wharf at Z,orneub.u g. For the history of this enterprise see "Report on the First Danube Shipping Company, Ships Wharf g" of August 1957 and pages 1-2 of the "Complementary Report on the First Danube Shipping Companys Ships Wharf Zornsuburg" of October 1957. it. Or *niz tion a. r M& 1. At the end of the war Soviet navy men occupied the Zorneub crg wharf and took over its nistratiot and administration of materiel. Personalities s Capt. 8isenberg Other mates unknown The Soviet directors of the Sbrneuburg shipyard weres 11012 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Aoreky (until As uet 1945) Sedich (until Jay 1947) (until October 1949) Mstov (until larch 1950) Kizetyov (antil beeaea r 1954) IftInikow (until June 1955) Ossipov (until August 1955) Purtheer details may be found on pages 9-11 of le ntary Report on the Fist Danube Shipping Co many, p s I+orneubarg," of October 1957. Ut. MM it Co:. Within Soiiee c Lion 1, t tod ti.on gjf v eat-omits r~ !"ollorring the occupation of the Iornet irg shipyard in April 1945 by the Soviets most of the tools, apparatus and materiel was carted off to Russia as war booty. Soventy-one percent of the araachine park wan dismantled and taken away. at already by the and of 1945 the Soviet wharf directors attested to crake good the arrachin a park., to increase the naWaer of workers and to push repairs on the ships that had been raised from the bed of the Already at the beginning of 1906 the Soviets began unofficial con-- veersations with various Austrian officials in order to bring about the tranartruation of the C into a nixed Soviet-Austrian cant'. In similar fashion the Soviets tried to interest the Auat~ in a Sov - llaphta compow for the exploitation and developmnt of Austrian oil. 1014 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Since the beginning of 1946 the Soviets carried on talks with the Austrians in order to obtain their agreeawm t to the transformation of the DSC Into a Soviet-Austrian DS+C. originally proposed a 5,1 percent Soviet participation with the Au. tr3 r holding the r iding 49 percent. During the coume of the talks it later bee plain that the Russians w d be content with a 50 percent participation if the Austrians would agioee to the n+t inat of a Russian Director Generl. The Austrians turned all these Proposals down with the objection that the DSC an well as the Austrian oil wells had already been earmarked for natlonalixation and that therefore t be regarded as prac- tically nationalized and that for this reason there me no question of them-being turned aver to other, ccapitalistic interests. It may ther*fore be concluded that the formation d' this Soviet cam( had the objective of creating a fictitious,, Independent partner visa via the DISC an as the question of participation had been cleared up. This method had resulted in Hungary# Bulgariap Romania and even in Yugoslavia in the formation of mixed des. One there- fore cows to the conclusion that the formation of a Soviet state company with national divisions and residing on a legal basis with the inclusion of Austria had as ultimate objective the placing of all Danube trade from V1,11"* Under Soviet control. j1pap 2. DSC and Jas chtx s ier l i The Soviet administration of DSC so= entered into close collabora- tion with Juschwneschtrans, although the date is not k mom, It uas 195 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 probably in 1947. With the conjunction of this transport firm, the soviet ministration of NC became a unified Soviet transport enterprise in Aus- tria, In practice it MRS a wpvly transport enterprise for all the USIA enterprises. 1 r+eaW Juschwneschtrsn took came of land trans- port, including connections with he airporlmp, the fC was charged With the mass transport of Booty by water. Collaboration between the Soviet t .igneas, Juscschtran, and the DSC made three things possible. One was the keeping secret of the movement of merchandise, the other the frictionles. transit of merchandise of different Soviet firsts and also, in collaboration with the militaarry, the siphoning off of customs dudes and allied taxes. Par further details concerning the tasks of Jusebwnioschtrans in collaboration with D8Cq see Chapter II of Section five, entitled "Trade and Transport in the Soviet Occupation Eco ay. " 3. a Xk)U iet Pout on 2M RNM-ft- After the failure of the plans to make out of the D SC a mixed Soviet-Austrian company* the Rt ssia e, beginning In 1949, increased their efforts to make the DSC more and more responsive to the require- sents of Soviet shipping and of Soviet economy in general. These plans are closely connected with the idea of' trap rming the Iorteuburg shipyard into a going concern. Eiselyov was made Soviet yard director. He was an experienced technician in this field with 30 years of endeavor behind him in Soviet 196 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 shipyards. Under him not only were new methods of warkIng and building introduced but he also brought in a reconstruction plan, complete in all details and which would have required the expenditure of about 133,000,000 schillinge . ' e pages 14 and 15 of the "Coollipl tart' Report on the DRC, Korneuburg ipyard," of October 1957.) As this October report says, the plan pointed to the necessity for the development of the Zorneuburg yard in the following word!t "Creation of greater production possibilities in order to cover the increasing need for shipping of the Soviet shipping ocs s es on the Dandbe " Such a statement can only be made by a man sent from Macaw if he is certain that at least in the mind of his Ministry the inapression exists that Austria would not be given up by the occupation authorities in the foreseeable future. Such a long-term plan would only have made some if a long occupa- tion, or even permanent possession, were intended. We were not able to discover why the plan cams to nought. It has also not been possible to find out unequivocably whether the construc- tion work done In 1953 and 1954 at a cost of 16#000,000 schillings was in fact a first part in the execution of this plan. (See page 21 of "Report on the DSC, Korn burg Shipyard," of August 1957.) IV. &MOY of is ROM ME the -t. Ec o Reliable doc=tentation concerning the services rendered during the Soviet occupation were only found at the Eorrneuburg shipyard. A list 197 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 has been reconstructed frcaat a current shipping register. According to it from Iby 1945 to 12 August 1955 the following were delivered or serviced s ft man 9 goods barges of 1,000 tow each 18 lighters of 250 tons each. Riveted (SL 411) 40 lights" of 1,000 ,awls each, Riveted. (SL 638) 9 floating pile drivers 1 motor ship (I Polt a at) . Thu ship was handed back by the Russians after signature of the State Treaty under the now of "ior eubu g. " 5 motor tugs 4 steam tags T tankers 35 S _ _.J des 4 special ships (floating doer, repair and M A9 ships) lWa rs 111MM and wi z 32 motor ships .1 *team tugs 50 tankers 32 goods barges 1 crane ship We calculated all this, work to be worth 50,000,000 schi.llings at a mid. A ma xin a- figure would be 100,000,000 schi.llings. (See "Complementary Report on the DSC, Shipyard Iorneuburg," October 195T.) To this at be added all those damages which cannot be calculated. Such demsge would include the loss of the entire fleet of ships of the IC and through it the lows of a leading role in the Danube trade. 198 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 This is a loss that Austria can only make good after a return to noz 1ity of trade relations with the satellite states. bat this c rOge is little when compared with those suffered by the xorneuburg yard internal construction methods were changed to produce ocean-going ships for the new market. am Section. TRADE AM IRMM T8 ' " ` OC FA I. CMILtion 10 Dnelg - t of ee and t ties The acquisition and development of extensive s rces of production in Austria presented the Soviets with the task of creating trade and freighting organizations. However, in this field it was not possible for these to proceed according to a pattern based on domestic Soviet methods. Although the Soviets were at painws to extend their production, planning and finaneft methods to Austria, they were constrained, however, In the fields of E,vc1-AVr trade and transport to take into account that their economic ao3seeeea lay in the area of a free economy. First off, they had to handle problem which arose at the end of the war Ong a population which was in a state of deprivation. The most basic tools of production particularly those mada of leather or textiles (such as driving belts) were lacking. The Mount of food that could be given the population was so a all-only 1,000 calories a day in the early sonthe--that regular and productive work could only be demanded of theses when the essentials in commodities and cloth" had been provided. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 The requirements in food and e r itient of the Soviet troops in Austria also had to be since goods Russia. . This eat the took more difficult in Auatrs& ad to supply Soviet troops in In order to to ar care of these deems the following economic bodies were formed: The first, in spring 1945, to otshem -Klan ramie t rurchasing and Trade Office) set up to supply the a r+ xtor rs (ailiftry stores). In 1946 race set up the ft2anum is v (Conaalaer Cooperative of Soviet Imp yeas in Austria). It supplied all. People working for Soviet official and +econ is offices. by Deus which,, hmwer, was headed by two Austriraras, Dire Dubik and Sehlsch act.. (See our "Special report on Cc a mist Trade Pirm Intrac, " of 1957 and "Xote* on two conversa- tions with Dr. D on 23 and 27 ftyauber 1957.") Letter, Latex and Woes asst ! trade functions which at the end of 1951 were handed over to Ort. Rezimpes worked for a abort tim in this field in 1953 and 1954. Particularly noteworthy are Intrac and the other Commist Party enterprises, most of which were fow dad in 1948 although the" were am*, in ex ste ncee in 1946. Theme Gc~serenist fie aqs occupy as special plane in the real= of Soviet o is entities inaaamch as they were not directed by Soviet amthorities? 200 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 but by the Central COMMittee of the UOe. As a result, when the Soviet occupation troops left, the fires were not di lvead, but con- tinue to exist although under modified conditions. With these exceptions, all other above-mentioned Soviet trade organizations were liquidated at the end of the occupation. The freighting complex presents a similar picture. Here, we have Juschwneschtrans a41 transport and freight agent concern dependent on Moscow. This was founded in 1946 as the'austrian branch" of the Soviet company with the same name. It was liquidated when the Soviet troops left. The Party firm "Express" and international freight agent company which had its beginning in 194u and was founded in 1947 or *arch 1948. This firm remained in existence after the departure of the troops. (See our "Special Report on Coomunist firms and personalities, Polcarbon, Martin Maimann, Turuoel, Express, Kraus & Co., Wagner & Co." of September 1957.) II. Trade in the Occupation Economy 1. The Soviet State trade o cations and firms Before the foundation proper of Soviet trade fires the trading function within the Soviet military apparatus was carried on by Zatupotshnavya T!orgovlaLva gContora (ZTiO which supplied the Yovenntorgs. (See our report "Notes on two conversations with Dr. D. on 23 and 27 November 1957.") The Voyenntorg was located in a house on the Kaerntnerring and had its offices on the second floor. It sold consumer 201 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 goods of all kinds only to Soviet service personnel. 9oyenntorg bought, in part, the necessary merchandise with schillifts on the Austrian market.' For the greater part,, purchases were, however, made through the Z31 which was located in Vienna IT, 1'sniglgaaae. The chief was Captain Sakhlennkov. When possible, this office bought merchandise on the open Austrian market that was need, by the Soviet troops in Austria. aver, since the supply was greater than the deman t, it increased its purchasing activities and began to supply troops stationed in IRussia, whose needs were mie known through liaison officers. Since here was an opportunity to purchase not only ccnsuser goods but also machines, finished products, non-ferrous metals and raw materials, it was not long before all the Moscow ministries were making use of Z to purchase items that were in short upply. Officially, the ZTi was only allowed to make purchases in Austria, but it nevertheless used middlemen to make purchases in the West, particularly stored supplies including abandoned W.hrmacht supplies. Payment was made in schillings which were made available by the Austrian government as occupation costs. According to our sources, not only goods but also hard currency, particularly dollars, were also bought. At the beginning most of the business was on the black market in which money was handed over for goods. Our sources believe that the purchases totaled one billion achillings. But with the first development and consolidation of the Austrian 0n'-l Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 ecoymW the supply became smaller and they had to turn their thoughts to the development of economically sound trading firm. With the development of Soviet production entities there were two problems that had to be solved. They were: 1. Now to supply those plants which were united in =1A, S M and the other corporations with short ply comsodities in leather and textiles as well as with other accessories and seem of production. 2. Now to supply those employed in these firms with food, clothes and other csraesr ids In the face of the dearth then 'prevailing. It was natal that the satisfaction of these seeds should have been turned over to Letex and Una. An attawept was also made to build up an independent distribution mechanism., destined to bring the mer- chandise directly to the cons tr. '!twits mechanism was the , Weratiya Consweuser Cooperative of Soviet Seployees in Austria). (See our report "lutes on two conversations with Dr. D. on 23 and 27 November 1957.11 ) These organizations were of ipfIA and were under the orders of the central office in tcow, particularly 't$1. We were not able to determine what part, if any, the Moscow Trade Ministry, played herein. Inquiries into this aspect of affairs was rendered particularly difficult--this includes Art and Deli x---because when the occupation troops left they were completely liquidated and left no successor organizations. This was in contrast to tIA which remained in being although the Soviet personnel disappeared. 203 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 r Latex had the task to procure the necessary textiles and leather goods needed by USIA and SM. They were to be proem ed if possible from Other MIA concerns and distributed asong the MU administrations. Latex also had the task t procure the eqvdLpmnt and raw material needed in USIA light industry that MIA did not produce itself from other areas of the Austrian economy or from the Past Bloc or the on a barter basis. As we have seen Degs was an element in the Austrian economy until 1948. Degas took care of the distribution of those Commodities which MIA light industry could deliver to the Austrian market. This was done partly in collaboration with the "try of Trade. It also had the task of procuring those aids to production and raw materials on the Austrian market necessary for the development of MIA production. After Dr. Dubik and Schtschka were arrested Letex carried on these activities itself and tried to set up a barter arrangement with the west. Prom the very beginning Latex itself took care of trade with the Boat Bloc and the #SR. Latex attempted to solve the second of its problems through the establishment of stores in the plants and of public stores. This gave rise to the so-culled Soviet Consumer Stores which were partly run by the USIA subsidiary "mod Industries?" and by Wkus. Vkgs also opened up retail stores of its own and also leased stores through Bezimpex. However, finally all these attempts led to the creation of a uni- fication of the retail stores through Ort, a division of USIA. 204 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 o 30-1-12t MAU e in 4 Ort, a Division of lal, was founded at the end of 1951. It way located at Yiearea IV, Argentinierstrasse 26. tart means retail trade and is formed frtou the initials of the Russian words a Rotndasty- n v , At its head stood a Russian director general. (See our "gpeciael report on W BU Trading Firs, Wkus, Latex, Ort according to documents of the years 1950 to 1955" of June 1957,) in this report we gave the addresses of 100 Ort s torees . Thus, out of the modest beginning when the object was to supply Soviet troops with hard-to-got commodities there grew a giant concern. Its stores, like those of the West# had practically everything for sale, food, carpets, radios, perms etc. The good longer case exclusively from =U plants, but partly from the Soviet Zone, from the Seat 21ft: and (rare the West. Prices were about half what they wa6" in Austrian stores. The reason for this was that tart paid no taxes of any kind, no custom dams and transport was frequently effected by the occupation forces. Further- more# the stores themselves were often requisitioned and so there was no rent to pay. One nut also take into consideration the fact that a great part of the commodities from the last Bloc and the Soviet Union where merchandise has no price tag an it in our western some of the word. The main profit for the Soviet economy lay therein that the goods were paid for in Austrian achillings which could, in part, be exchanged for western currency. 205 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 According to our est1nates, during the time of the occupation the Soviets had a turnover of eight to 10 billion schillings in these stores; this corresponds to a net profit of about 2 billion achi.llings. Iaweever, this is a rough estiaaete and is not backed up by figures. It was therefore not included in our earlier estl to of the over-all Soviet profit =de in Austria. Hut, in addition to these finsncia, advantages there we others that the Soviets drew fr?n their activities in this field. 1. larch andise which normally would not have been exported was sold at retail prices against ;chill nga. Por theme sc .l..ings the Soviets and the Mast Salon could procure important coneodities and even procure currency on the nuimt, which again in turn could be used to Purchase, hard-to-get amities. 2. There political and propagandistic advantages t fte sale of merchandise cheaply in the stores at a time when things were hard to come by awakened the impress; ion that the Soviet economic ctaat was better than that of the free b) 7to V- stores served directly as propagawa offices for the Me. There, signatures for cover Cane ist organiza- tions (Peace COGncil, etc.) were obtained and for other purpose" such as the protest against use of the aton bomb. ) Damage was 1geols merchants by the Soviet storee. This signified not only a weakening of the political enemy' but also softened threat up for Coaeeuni*t propaganda. 206 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 d) Through theme stores it was also possible to give support to the KPOe by giving ambers and fellow travelers well- paid jobs in In addition to all these advantages, there was also the damage done the Austrian State which was deprived of taxes, custom dues, etc. It also hurt the State through the creation of an unsupervised sector of the econamsy and through the resulting atmosphere of uncertainty. 2. PM c the t In order to deal with the problems of trade wader the occupation the Soviets not only made use of the, above-described organizations such as Deg+os, tex, Waus and tart, but they created entirely different ones. In our Special Reports from My to October 1957 we went into detail con- cernirag Intrac and the Comswgnist Party firm. These firms were directly dependent on the Pore. As far as the law was concerned they were direc- ted by front m of the Central Committee but in fact they were owned by the KPOe and served the financial, economic and political Ems of the Com .mist Party. It should be noted be" just like the Z, firm the Communist Party ones were In the- in )Ss cow and that Our reseorch ted from a central location the Com nform and its successor organizations. that the leading personals sties in Intrac and the other Communist Party firms not only were in direct contact with the Economic Division of the E e ?.S but also with the Cominform. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 An analysis of the activities of the Cc mist Parties of other countries shows they were--like the 043e-forward positions of diet policy, econaepr and information gathering. They were directed by the Ceti nfors and by its cover or risatlo , partly with the aid of the !Ministry of foreign Affairs. The central direction was thus through the ,7ZCPSU. While the A firms were in the last is directed by the Nosc ow ministrieeso the Party fires were directed by a central post of the CPSV In Moscow. Although in theory this would not appear to make a great difference, in practice such differences are not to be undereestierateed. It should be noted in particular that the fir in general were directed by Soviet Russians whereas the chiefs of the XW* fires were meetly of Austrian origin and spoke German even if they had spent a long time in J scow or had paraded work abroad for the Cosinf rs. We have described how the ftesians used Degos to ^ake their first contacts with the Austrian economy. Aeegc was a firm directed by Austrians but who were nevertheless izreediateely dependent mean the RRZA Light Itd# - Administration. From 1948 on, the KPOe and the C central bureaus sees[ to have come to an agreement in accordance with which the greater part of intor- national trade and also a part of the Intrac transport work was re s,*rveed for the Cist Party firmer and for Express.. Retail trade was entirely in the hands of U. A part of the eastern trade and above all the supplying of t$i enterprises with raw 208 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 materials and other necessities me to the hands of Latex, which like Wkus, did not have to occupy itself with retail trade. The greetter part of the International trade, particularly the barter with the free world, was the work of Intrac and of the Communist Party firm. Proas May through October 1957 we presented detailed reports on these firms, giving concrete examples of their business, descriptions of the leading man and of their connections with each other. Our analysis shower that the Blast Bloc was supplied by the Communist Party firms with important strategic materials such as wood, non-ferrous metals and ball bearings. It is also clear that the Bast Bloc used these firm to market those goods which normally would not be exported and which could not be paid for in schillings or in hard currency. Theme items were such things as Halton tobacco, Hungarian fowl and fruit, etc. A further task of these firms tsaea to spin a network of hidden con- nections with the Free Worms economy. Although unable to analyze fully those Co-"list firms which had their seat in Austria we nevertheless had been able to give the names of corresponding firms in western countries. One may suppose that they had the same duties as the Cc.- mat firms NO and used the sense methods. There is no doubt that it f.: was a matter of a world-wide not of C ist-orient.d firms with various connections with their native Communist Party and with Moscow. They remain to be examined. Through use of the foreign connections it was also possible to sell a lot of merchandise in the West against currency. Chief among 209 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 these activities was the scrap trade which brought in millions of dollars. That is $ brief outline of the epic task* that Intrao and the C+ iat Party fires carried out in the interests of the Soviet ion and, V Blast Bloc. The executiesar of these tasks greatly facilitated during the occation by the fact that the frontiers with CND asei s'y more held by Soviet soldiers.. There was thus no such thing am an Austrian cuastons service between these countries. ohm the troops aided these firms and reports dark business and no atten- tion was paid to taxes and deiees, or to the state holy on spirits and tobacco. This went so far that the mist Party firms sometimes engaged in black market operations in tobacco, textiles and other pro- ducts and used rods that were guarded by the Sovietas so that the Austrian police could not Intervene. (Bes our "Special Report on the Crier t Trading Firms, "c# etc. on i 19W.") The direct final i l objective of Intrun and the other Camsudat Me to reinforce financially the Blue. As our reports show the sonny was handed over to the donations. her directly or in the form of An indirect contribution to the Oft was also the employment of a number of Cadre son as confidential clertas, sleeping partners and company mesrhers, eto.,, as well as giving app oyaent to Party members and their hangers-on. We have absolute proof that the greater part of the minor employees and workers of thaw firs were members of the ROe and took part in Com unist and moist-friendly organizations. 210 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 I"! Ci . 1 fi111010 411111110 i sd' Pakdy~" tuned' Ui I" In'saime `` cif wft able to that t, pas such sus ltram t '# W4m.r A s 4d , ae- amd-' otb s intel Allies =' gatl> s vitae Or dodlmesfget of *ieit we havep svrat l tdart "to examine thorougl s indicates the nMM of leading peersaretlit aa~e .bsi a sd hall 1 seacht eeffalre. Wnmv*r, ssnr salt wrier WbW&' that three isdieatia are? : to" LOW rrt . than the aetsel *atttriti xer and Omm, - "'I sarsir as that ?-*11 f st firm the- in 4"18M ; #s . 1Nid a fells' f"fsrs the IVWt . drat- these !iris trees bOW& d vP by 1ple w had be elslrpbdt to the or t* the W Effie s is war rhi1* to note the number of firm which increased their cover in "teas' to maim saav.il base by the Vest mom diffie :t. Also >miieeeorthy In t/bwr: rs ativ l1 saa IL ? rtr of lerad#ng? peveo=L114te0 -whose rissres aftear, is the west direpa~rse er pests :I& them fires am, again. It is isportast that two- M" bit abler to obtalnw the mom of asst of an paream who MW* Samuel tlrr 3st tart 1n the, bac is : the iblt+s .lrar 46"M *1 of 'th EQs, FIND rabsrg hiarsaelt. Farther t re is his deter Ernestine and his brott -is- #ir ,J* Xmm: +le tsskj ?'! were &U 'r is r dam- the INV and are -to be _a!argarded ad, tvalttsd ` lssdig Comm. atat ass ti oalardes . W also see that the above-mentioned party firms and the Soviet economic tm.tsllatioaw in is trla '- -tste4- and a pas' Yt+.n e by the selection ;of the top tears. To this circle belonged 211 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Dr. Heinrich lagler, a top O minform functionary, Paul Kessler,, of the KBOe ZK. Other members are US. Eduard Gold 0 who was also in lbee ow during the emigration, Stefan gamin., Ernst paterst, Dr. Albert Brans, Robert Bondi, Peter iselmanna lart Bettelheist, Ignaz Slum, David Kowa and Martin Naim ann . All these persons were in the "migration*" most of then in England, some in Switzerland, like Dr. Albert Kraus, or in Belgiu*, like Peter ibiselaestnn. This is an internationally trained staff of Coo munist economic experts who with expertness, initiative and discipline serve the KPOe or the Cominfarm in the solution of economic problem. In some cases they fall victim to temptation or corruption as was true of Ernst Liebling. In addition, there is a series of younger people who were used for the more dangerous and mostly illy tasks of Express Co., such as Kurt Pried, Erich Herzl, Bans Joachim der and Carl (Chaim) Faber. It is to be noted that Fried, Berm and ltlamper served in the English army and while they were in 'Vienna going about their Communist economic work they were still wearing the British uniform and having contact with the British military, All these people had their special knowledge and their special tasks and worked usually undisturbed together. We hear little of any personality clashes. In s==try it may be said that Intrac and the Costnist firms had the following objectives: 212 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 direct and indirect financial Ad to the KM*; provide a liaison and Lt ?rvice; to further the economic interests of the Soviet Union and those of the Bast Bloc through the procurement of important raw materials and goods in short supply. This could be done through the sale of surplus merchandise and the acquisition of foreign currenc: M. Qrg satioa and i s of Like the trade aechan in system was divided into two. parts t the Soviet *"ten and that of the ZPOe ntrolled firms. Develbpaent and activity is exactly the same as described in Chapter II above and will not be repeated here. In our month of lily report we wrote in detailed fashion about the Transport and Freight Agency JuSc chtrsns, Ivan Pppoff, Vienna IV, Wohllebengasse 8. At the same time our "Spacial on the Communist Firms and Personalities, Pol ce,.I rtin faimann, del, Uprose, XZIM & Co. and Wagner & Co. on September 1957,v" on pagers 31-8? gives a detailed account of the Express Cam, Internati,o Freight Agents G.m.b.I., Vienna I, Wohllebengasse 18. companies had the mission to expedite the transport of Merchandise within the framework of the mist econanic system. The system had financial advantages since owning their own companies made it possible to pay profits into the Communist circuit. In addition, they wanted to set up their own companies so that dest#tions and corer 213 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 This was achieved he very careful screening of all personnel from a Comas -istic point of view. In addition, the producing firms did not have to pack the merchandise and put the labels on it and the trans- port was carried out Such freighting companies Were of and 1 importance to the Soviets because the greater part of the goods ordered by the and the Zest Bloc was sent by rail. The Danube Shipping Co. did not for- ward such during the early =u period become of a l k of shipping. Juschwnftchtrans Worked in conjunction with the military authorities in procuring means of transport. If there were not enough transport available, the military requisitioned it "for military pies." As reported in our "Special Report on transport and freight office Juschwneschtrans, Ivan Popoff, *to.". Juschw chtrana and Express pos ewd a virtual ao-nopoly over all transport by lAnA,, whether by road or rail,, and also order Soviet and Satellite lines feeding aviation termi.- Ju schwneschtrans had its own transport office in each major 4XA firm. Their offices were everywhere directed by Russians. This also aided the abovee-meentiod Y- This .xp1*ins why for years the production engineers in plants did not krww where their merchandise was going.. Even the shipment of spare parts was organizd in the sere fashion. This method of transport was one of the main roanow why the extent of trade with the East Bloc and 214 on remained hidden Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 throughout the years and also the reason why information services were not able to track the dispatch of strategic materials to the Soviet Juschwmeschtra ns also had its own division within the DSO. (See Fh h Section.) It was may to keep the destination of merchandise going by water secret because the shipyards could only be entered by Austrians carrying special posses. It must also be noted that Jus4hwneschtrans and Saps were estab- lished to by-pow the Austriaan costemm regulations. Jtastchwne achtrans had the protection of the Soviet Oc pation authority and was thus able to by-pass the Austrian custom whenever desired. Jucsc .chtrans made use of this possibility, not only when it was Justified as it was in the case of merchandise needed by the Soviet troops in Austria, but also in the case of shipments serving the interests of USIA and of the Communist party firm. There was, for ins of the 1950 shipment of 10,000 kilogram of copper to angry. There was also the case of ball bearings and scrap metal in the value of 1,,,000 schiilia which were also sent to wry through the intermediary of Juschwheschtrana and Express, in which the customm, authorities were by-psasted. As mentioned above, Austrians had no access to the shipping stations or to the Soviet airport at Voes t- ttingbrunn. As a result by-passing the Austrian custom authorities became a regular thing and even in April 1956 10,000 liters of spirit were snuggled by Express out of Austria into CO. 215 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 great role and one of the beta bok official trade of the?t d Cast trading fires crir,. the, occupation. IT. Final MUM result of w+e3~l ~t role in :. trawut,.: prod, nrta8' schillinga. Without them the So thinkable and they had epic system in Austria is un- of forming liaison and bridge-hewed teas between Bast and West. Of special importance was Int: role of financing the BDft courier services. in its financing of the Intelligence and for the pat f '#.c i - and In contrast to the other parts of the Soviet economic system in Austria the organization of the trade sector could not be organised in accordance with strict domestic -viet regulations. Instead, they had to find solutions which were not patterned on the d stic Soviet system which could be adapted to conditions. In known that similar establiskvents exist in different west European and Asiatic countries. ?hey have the same objectives. The special conditions pp find special solutions. Such were: The organization of the retail star which united the re methods and the n Austria snide it necessary to through Art division of uSIA) dyatew of Latex and W us and which also included 210 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 -4 the ll o ty et tr and BezlmWex. The partial subtraction of international trade front Letex which apart frost its branch adarinistration function was sajnly concerned with supplying SIA plants with necessary raw arste ria is originating in the asst. Finally, the foundation and development of lntrac and the C g anist Party firms as economic organizations of the SFOe. Their had under theea the trade with Boat and West insofar as it was not handled by Intrae. #AM 300%&m. TSB sacm Worm' Motet The following chapter is based on our "Special Report on the Soviet lq.litary Hank, No. 2111," on the "Report on the conversations of 27, 28 June and 2 and V3 July 1957, on the indications given by the forager level councillor of SBXA as contained in The Report on the Con- versation of 2 October 1956" and on organization. of the Soviet credit 1. $i..'~.t"q' a L 1.d,tr the According to the "Report on the Conversation of 2 October 195b," page 9. Soviet field bank No. 80 was transformed into S.B. No. 2111. This bank was probably I+ town originally as "MM Field Bank ft. 2111 (Oee Report. page 15). Probably only in the course of 1946 was the names "1lilitary ftnk of the Soviet Union No. 2111," adopted. This remained unchanged throughout the occupation. 217 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 The seat of the was originally located at Viz t, Graf 8tarhaa tberggssse '4-$, the same address as the UM Administration and was moved to Vienna I# probably in connection with the grove of A to that address. The original capital of the bank was probably about 534,000,004 Reichsmark,. This money was taken as booty from the B tchebank offices in Vienna and the auxiliary offices in Graz and I oben. Other meanies came frca the Ccap rcia1 Banks in Vienna and lAw" Austria.. It is pos- sible that allied military achillirgs were also at the bank's die The capital also probably cc its d some of the money that was paid the Soviets as occupation costs. (In December 1945 alone this was 900000,,000 schillings.) (See O Report, pages 12 and 13 ff . ) 2. Di .1142191an in 1215. The dissolution of the S M in 1955 presented no difficulties after the Austrian Control Bank took over S M's credits and after clearing up the "current accounts." On hand-over day, 16 July 1955,, the 3 's outstanding credits totaled 762,887,874,48 schillings and were paid by the Control Bank in the amount of 508,900,000 sehilli s in two installments. Details on the liquidation of the S are to be found in our report (page 30 ffj. II. 49s atitsa 1. i arectp 90 According to our "Study on the Soviet Cred (page 1) and to Organisation" rt (p 4) the Soviet field banks were 218 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 branches of the Soviet State flank. It is probable that the Soviet State ink gave theB its capital. The important reports and balance sheets of the SNBo the accounts of Qosbank and of the satellite state banks as well as the military accounts were all in the hands of Soviet personnel, so that nothing said about then. 2. Relationship to our sources report that the Sl!IB was not subordir*te to the 4IA Administration. It is certain? however, that the Planning to determine the amount of investment and plant credits of USIA, S1f, DSC and Wien-Film was done within the i rk of lbs over-all plan. in this manner, the according of credits was within the competence of the Rank while investment credits could only be accorded by the Administra- tions. 3. Raeelati onshi to other OCLUAI.1129 ti ti The organization of the bookkeeping of the branch administrations of MIA and of the other organisa in relationship to the adminie- tration of the Soviet assets in Austria tends to show a close cooperation between S1 and USIA. IIDat of these relationships are discussed in Point M. .t_jtaip stttutio: Originally the intention was to incorporate the SNB into a banking system under the Austrian banking and also through the acqui- sition of a banking concession (Breiabach & Co.) thereby fitting it 219 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 into Austrian legal and economic form. (See "Report to the Conversation of 2 October 1955" with Dr. It. who was the legal councillor of USIA up until 19418, page 9.) After this, plan was cad,, the relations of to Austrian institutions was limited to the taping of ,chilli. accounts in the Austrian Rational Bank and in ease other nationalized band, 5. internal O iization 7 he following positions chart sus that all important positions within the bank were filled by Soviets. Director General Russian Chief of Credit Division Austrian Chief of Actin: Russian Chief Russian Accountant Chief Cashier Your Russian Two Austrian Experts Russian Higher Four Austrian t omptrofere Accountant Cashiers Account Austrian Rank Chief & Ctsaptroll.er Expert Russian Bookkeeper (female) 6. Personnel The following have been named as General Directors: A.*. Tairulik (from the beginning to 14 September 1950. Arrested for unknown reasons. ) A. R. Savanin (1950-1953) 1. Rsvvin (1953-1955) Credit Division chiefs were, I.K. ftrahanOvA (Probably from the beginning; possibly in this function only from 1948-1951.) I. Savvin (1951-1953) Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 S. Earporich (1953-1955) Bookkeepe rsa probably Plotaitsky (being to 1948) 1. ifEtkDlayev (?) (1948-1951 P. Iri nilo 7 (1951-1955) Deputy Bookkeepersa T.D. Qlotova (beginning to 1948 and 1950-51) A.W. Poroshin (?)(1949) X. Kobtsev (1951-55) Signatures at the Austrian National Banc enabled us to identify the leading personalities in an (tea palge 18 of Report) . M. M" of The 81 was the accounting and treasurys cent..e r of the entire Soviet economic system in Austria. S gave the recd plant credits and watched over the use made by the :individual administration* of investment credits. It was also undoubtedly the organism in charge of international boo particularly that of the Bast Bl Th e AM ft AgggigI&M and t.. tut 7he SMB carried accounts exclusively of plants and organizations within the Soviet economic systetaa. Despite many attests the accounts of the Bast bloc trade, or those of Austrian or other western firms were not carried. (See annex to 3* S rt,, page 2; "etas an Conversa- tion of 13 February 1957.") 221 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 According to our sources there was a strict order that all financial transactions were to be carried out through i. Credits in Austrian bans could only be touched by MU with permission of S. {1h credits had to be transferread to . In this manner all fiduciary transactions were centralised in 8W. For the purpose of waking paymente, the plants and administrations had current accounts for day-to-day laments to suppliers, for salaries etc. ire was a special bureau within called . Xx ,,,r kh . gtschotov ( c), which took care of the reciprocal claim and payments between USIA plants. We have been able to prove the existence of this bureau back to 1947. According to the economic statistical quest ieiri s, 12 percent of the payments of 'fit industries were t R. (Zone branches even made 24 percent of their payments through it.) The reason for BUR activity in Austria might have been due to the need for cutting down on the of supplies and to statistical It,, for a quick t*rnov donations. We have presented a detailed examination of the R organization and In it we described more closely the functions of VM. (See Atudys "AiiiRs Soviet Dut and Output Calculation, its importance and ,possibilities.") In order to participate in the BWR the 30 had its own B%M accounts and B fR credit accounts. 222 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 2. The M' it Fc n exclusively extended credits needed for the acquisition' of the means of production. The types of each means of production and the techniques used in their acquisition correspond exactly to those employed in Soviet Russia. (C+sw4rare: W. . Batyryov and N.M. skin. Sort- tam credit and the organization of currency circulation in , Die Wirtachaft, Berlin, 1954 and also our "Studies on the Soviet Russian Organization of Credit," page 3.) In Austria, @1 accorded the following creditat a) Standard credits against standard stocks of raw materials, production auxiliaries,, halt-finielmdd and finished products, b) Extra-standard credits against such as the above, c) Extra-standard credits am, t uncollected debts? d) Over-drattt credits on 81 business,, a) Over-due creditor, t) Seasonal credits,, g) Discount credits, h) Credit on interest (see details in report;, pp 19-22). A special review division was wed above all with enforcing the rigorous observance of the bank's regulations by those seeking credit. According to our sources the responsible administration had to sass=* the guarantee for payment of the credits. (See MIM rs-port, page 24). Interest rates the time and type of credit. For standard credit the rate was 24 percent, extra-standard credit rate was 8-9 percent and over-duee credit was charged 11-12 percent. 22' Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246A050300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 3. ton aver the Use of Credottasents The Bank itself did not accord any kind of Investment credit. Investment credits were only opened by the Administration. Zevertheless, the Bank controlled the use tirade of such credits. In the case of the accordance of investment credits,, the Bank debited the Administration and ,gave the individual plants investment credit against their own financing accounts. The plants could dispose over these credits within the framework of the investment plan against orders. Through Its Review Division the Bank watched over Installment payeaente, the obser- vance of cost estimates and the proper use of the credit. 4. 3e of he Meg &B the tt . n tsa The role of BM in international affairs is not very clear. fttr.83.cs According to our source the accounts of the satellite state banks were carried by SM. At the same time it is reported that the business affairs within the ruble bloc were not part of S M. Even when one takes into account paragraph 9 of the Agreement No. 02/55 regarding the reciprocal exchange of goods between the ~riar~ Bank for Foreign Trade and the IZB, the role played by HO in Bast Bloc trade should not be overestimated. According to this paragraph SM was not S included in the business of good ext* ge. W ass According to our source, HHA and sbank had accounts in Western banks. They were partly under Soviet influence (Banque du hoard, Paris.) It is reported that these accounts were used to pay for the importation of embargo merchandise. 224 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 According to our source, all foreign accounts were directed by Soviet Russians. It was not possible to find any documentation on this subject in Austria concerning S M. For this reason information con- cerning the role of S M in the international banking field is see. 5. 8-M-1 ft t f Sov . t ,mil li As we reported in "Annex to the Spectsl Report on Soviet Military Bank No. 2111," the SM in Austria did not collect any taxes,, at least not from the plants, on behalf of the Ste. Nevertheless, there is the possibility that taxes and other dunes were paid into the Soviet State DSink through the intermediary of the SM. This is indicated by a reference in our "Study on the Soviet Credit Organization" which said that the State Bank had the responsibility for the collections and expenditures of the Soviet Treasury. This included the collection of taxes. As a result of the lack of source material it was not possible to determine in what form and in accordance with what principles the Administrations made payments in favor of the Treasury. IV. Btfects an 't'here is no doubt that the existence of 3 had certain effects on Austrian economy and particularly, bier se between 5-7 percent of the Austrian money and credit vole m was withdrawn from the control of the Austrians. In the same manner,, the currency traffic between the East Bloc and the Western states that went through 90 was outside the control of Austrian currency reostrictio s . Whether this was damaging and to what degree is hard 225 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Seventh Section =IS ACc T1NG SYVM anti jimci I. PrincIASS of Llang The far-racing unity of the accounting eysten and its inter- meshing devrelopwsnt moake it appear advisable to deal with them in the same chapter. There are two divisions to the accounting systems planning and accounting (Including the entire reporting system) as proof of the fral- fillaeant of the plan. Planning and ac ting are exceedingly closely united in their deveeloprteenst, bateame the balance sheet of the past period trays serves as the draft for future planing. We have been able to show that the orost iogortant paste of the W plant planning and accounting in MA ce'mstrsatctad entirely on the Russian pattern. The same applied to, t w technique and means of plan- nings to the accounting and also to the organization of plWALing. our 3tadye "Tloe Soviet System of Plant PIAT9dng," particularly Section M. Also "Analysis of the Soviet accounting plan for Austrian enterprises, " Particularly Section V-) Based on the fact that =IA plant planning and accounting mast closely followed the Soviet syst n# it molly be a sseswd that the planning and accounting in the tndivrUWal b ch odministrattom of MIA were also run in accordance with the Soviet pattern. accoMtIng of the Individual planning and trat es were handled in a plenum and accounting part of the Ibis Adetinistration. It is pr efiable that 226 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 the Plans and Accounting divisions of 1 1A-Morin Administration were part of the Russian ' raatiorai econaereic setup and in this connection it is possible that they were part of the in Adsiniatratton for Soviet Property Abroad with its headquarters in scow. To this eszsasaptioo we bring the following bits of evidences 1. 3ame account plans and sans accounting systems for all plants, regardless of whether they were under MU, SMW or the DSC. These eleaaleents Presuppose a unification of the balance sheets and eantrol, by the state as is done in Russia. (Core "A*1Pais of the Soviet SIer2.ance Sheet System for Austrian Enterprises, " page 14.) 2. Our wort shows that the branch administrations of 1A also established balances and plans. According to it the aministr,'a- tions established balances "by cutting up the individual bars of the plants, stuck the line one under the other and added t em up. The resulting total was the balance of the administration. " This Indication by our source could not be checked. reerthele+sa, Soviet literature constantly points to the fact that the national ecvnoyr plans c outain the directives for the plans of the Individual induastr adainfttra- tioaats, and the plans of the slain adnaisiatratiose the directives for the individual plant plans. (See OW report "The Soviet System of plant In the some eseaener the pmt balances and reports was probably also the source of iasfoet ap ~.ng the fulfi12a mt of plans by the, branch administration; ift le Use balance* and reports of the Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 branch administrations provided the information concerning the fulfill- vent of the total =U plan. 3. It is interesting to note that the separate parts of the Soviet over-all economic balance contain exactly those column headings contained in the standard forms that were used for the plant balances. So, for example, the "Balance of the Ground Capital" (installations, equipment and buildings) of the VSR has the cols headings which the standard accounting foris No. 3 has and which are entitled "Report on the Changes in Investmentsi " the simplified form No. 4 entitled "Report on the Fulfillment of the Plan for the production of ram materials and goods" probably served as a base for the balance of production sheet known as "the most important in the scheme of national ecanom y." Through the study of plant planning and the pertinent doci ents it was possible, to a high degree, to study the system of Soviet plan- ning. In this connection we would like to point to the following material: II. Plwt Planning a Accomtti 1. For Flaming Organizations "Instructions for the drafting of plan calculatis , proposals for production costs and expense norms within the Plant systems for the year 1955-11 This exists in photostat and came from the Voith Plant from 1955. It contains indications of the influence of the administrations, the eatabiisimeunt of production plans and an the drawing up of norm. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 2. Individual Plant Plans a) Production plan: photostat of "Plan on Production...,'' contained in the Voith Plaant, 1955. b) Plan for the exploitation of production caapacityt photo. d) Plus for the need of materials and fuels etc: No plans could be found, but they ant have existed since they were necessary for the calculations of plans, aoa a m etc. e) Labor ibrce Pl e: Rio documents could be found. Bat we have evidence that they existed. (Standard farm 6) f) Plan for the Prise Coat of Products: pyres ted in photo- stat in the "Year Plan 1955" of the Voith Plana * . stet of "Production Level 1953-54," from the Voith Plant. Plans for technical d velopment: Xiselov, the Reconstrue- tion of the Korn tb Shipyard (p seated In film No. 28). Rlaboration concerning the reconstruction of the Zorn. shipyard . g) Pstance Plant The plants 3. Itaablished the bases .for the finance plan. (lee the Soviet System of Plant Planning, page 20.) Plant Reporting System This was contained in a report on "?be Reporting system in a BPtZA textile firm, *.rtbel i Co., Woel lersdorf, " in a number of photostats. T ere were also a or of copses of Voith Plant balm an well as sheets from other 229 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80TO02 The balance aaw1 reporting systems show the closest connection with the Planning s stm. "I. a the W&LdJjM to and n1ir tt For the accounting between plant and the responsible =IA adatinistration we have the "Protocol concerning the control of internal accounting between Yeeith, St. Poelten and the Podyamik Division." This was presented In Photostat for l rt 1954. his dent was also Presented in our report "Accounting Dew Plant and Ron; m m,sible Adadnistaratian. it Accounting between Plant and its Adsinistration entailed: adatinis.. tration dues, )Profit oeet~intetxufnce of plants, se gl terry expenditures for social purposes, araartinttion, investment overdrafts, accounting for deliveries to the adsis3.strati on and of its, tam, etc., which were not paid to the Austrian State. Further dos tation concerns Investments and general repairs. Internal accounting gives an insight into the functioning of the Ada inialstratiens . XT. Z+MjPlashares eM Aot titaec ~~~lul As we have already stated it was not possible to present material c ceerni the planning and accounting systems of the aftimatmuons. Nevertheless, it is ,possible to say that such systase existed. There town: have bean ds+atartaewa tatien ihowiasg the state of sue pl pt,ptitarchases and males, not only anew the rely. but with other oaWmdasat le s . 230 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T FWth*V yore, the existence of an seco of a ld qn4 tmtfr,r- at AM Mskee It ce in that the administrations had an accounting system w i t h their p l a n t s and with t h e s u p e r i o r or nisatjons . The cot of the a stretion me probably bed. Tis would explain fit No. 2. ( fit and Loss acorn t) . V. On the basis of material, we have round it is to be assumed that the pertoswance and success of the i y l =2A branch a dmististratjons were natcbod by the MIA Mein Adllstn stretioen and the Main Adminutration of t b* 8 Vi*t Assets Abroad. The fern of reporting and accounting used in =U points In this diroct , 'die erxmw]A a cited load also to this c ncleation. t SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/07: CIA-RDP80T00246AO50300590001-8