TEST RESULTS ON SOVIET ELECTRIC LIGHT BULBS
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80T00246A042000440001-6
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
4
Document Creation Date:
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date:
May 25, 2010
Sequence Number:
1
Case Number:
Publication Date:
April 30, 1958
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 208.55 KB |
Body:
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6
11!'111111K "W"
NFORMATION REPORT
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
,This material contains information affecting the National Defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Laws, Title
18, U.B.C. Secs. 793 and 794, the transmission or revelation of which in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law.
S-E-C-R-E-T
COUNTRY USSR
SUBJECT Test Results on Soviet Electric Light
Bulbs
NO. PAGES
REQUIREMENT
NO.
DATE OF
INFO.
PLACE &
DATE:AC-
DATE DISTR. 30 April 1958
REFERENCE'S
,, 25X1
pROCg SING COPY
A report containing the results of tests run on five electric light
bulbs and two fluorescent tubes%which were purchased in the Soviet Union,
ILX-
NAVY X IAIR
C
(Note: Washington distribution indicated by "X", Field distribution by "#".)
AEC
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6
SECRET
U. S. S. R
Economic/Scientific
Manufacture of Electric Lamps in RUSSIA: Test Results,
at a GUM Store in M0S00W purchased some electric
lamps which have subsequently been tested with the results given
hereunder.
2, Four of the lamps, marked on test A, B, C and D were nominally of
82 watts rating; one., marked E, was rated at 150 watts and tvto.marked F and G
were nominally 15 watt fluorescent tubes. Lamp "A" has been made available for
further study,
Filament Lamps A.B.C.D and E,
a) Lamp "A" 220V, 8211', Clear Coiled Coil
Mounting Very bad, coil pitch uneven due apparently to
stretch on mounting. Coil is out of one loop
and this defect was present when lamp was purchased.
Loops appear hand-made and badly inserted. Nickel
lead wire badly bent and distorted,
Capping Wire exposed in top contact. The side wire has been
are-welded but is now disconnected, As in the other
lamp of this type the copper lead to the centre contact
appears smaller in diameter than that to the side,
b) Lamp "B" 220V 82;T, Pearl Coiled Coil
Sealing'-in Bad shape top appears to be blown out,
Capping Soldering had been used instead of arc-gelding for the
side contact, but the finished Job is poor in appearance,,
Cap appears to be zinc-coated steel,
c) Lamp "C" 220V, 8Z7, Clear Coiled Coil
Mounting Very bad, Coil pitch very uneven due apparently to
/stretch,,.....
SECRET
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6
rr,
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6
25X1 SECRET
--2-
stretch, Supports-
upports pen ed nted but the advantage of the 25X1
construction completely wasted by too narrow lead spacing
and insufficient angle of support. Clamps badly made,.
Cam Crooked, Top soldering poor, Wire exposed, Cap
appears to be zinca#coated steel. Cement appears under-
baked and has run into the well, The side wire is arc--
welded. No evidence of fusing although the copper lead
to the centre contact is smaller in diameter than the
other, (Accidentally broken).
d) Lamp "D" 220V, 82W. 900 lrns. Pearl Coiled Coil
Sealing-4 Bad shaped top, blown out.
C appin& Soldering has been used for side contact - appearance
is fair. Cap appears to be zinc-ooated steel.
e) Lamp "E" 22OV. 150~1, Internal White Finish Side Coil
Sealing-in Slightly blown top.
Capp Soldering used and the appearance is satisfactory.
The cap seems to be zinc-coated steel,
f) INITIAL PHOTOMETRIC READTTGS and PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS
A B C D E
VOLTS 22
0 220 22
0 220 220
AMPS
0.359 0.366
0095 0,356 0.637
WATTS (actual) 7
9.0 80.5 8
6.9 ;3 140.1
WATTS (nominal) 8
2 82 8
2 82 150
LUMENS (actual) 85
9 869 97
0 768 1486
B.S.I. nominal lumens 104
0 1040 104
0 1040 2090
LIIVWATT 1
0.88 10.79 1
1.16 9,81 10.60
Overall length 12
1 128.,5 12
1 127 172
Light-centre length 9
0 95 9
0 94 Internal White
Fluorescent Tubes F and a) Coate; very poor, thin and non--uniform.
b) Colour; similar to "daylight" standard.
1(o) Physical dimensions....,,,,,,
SECRET
25X1 9853
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6
SECRET
c) Physical dimensionst i) Overall length of both F and G just
complies with specification.
ii) Orientation of cap pins: F 50 error
G 150 error
(F---] specifies 6? maximum error) 25X1
solder too far up pins. The
that it fails to run properly,
5. An expert in lamp manufacture has coi.u,iented "The general quality
is so bad that one wonders whether they are really representative of Russian
manufacture, yet the manner of their purchase suggests that they must be, It
is interesting to note that coiloddooil filaments are usedt ir.iplying a good
quality tungsten and competent metallurgy and wire-drawing techniques., quite
out of keeping with the quality of the finished product."
SECRET
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6