TEST RESULTS ON SOVIET ELECTRIC LIGHT BULBS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80T00246A042000440001-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 25, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 30, 1958
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80T00246A042000440001-6.pdf208.55 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6 11!'111111K "W" NFORMATION REPORT CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ,This material contains information affecting the National Defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Laws, Title 18, U.B.C. Secs. 793 and 794, the transmission or revelation of which in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. S-E-C-R-E-T COUNTRY USSR SUBJECT Test Results on Soviet Electric Light Bulbs NO. PAGES REQUIREMENT NO. DATE OF INFO. PLACE & DATE:AC- DATE DISTR. 30 April 1958 REFERENCE'S ,, 25X1 pROCg SING COPY A report containing the results of tests run on five electric light bulbs and two fluorescent tubes%which were purchased in the Soviet Union, ILX- NAVY X IAIR C (Note: Washington distribution indicated by "X", Field distribution by "#".) AEC 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6 SECRET U. S. S. R Economic/Scientific Manufacture of Electric Lamps in RUSSIA: Test Results, at a GUM Store in M0S00W purchased some electric lamps which have subsequently been tested with the results given hereunder. 2, Four of the lamps, marked on test A, B, C and D were nominally of 82 watts rating; one., marked E, was rated at 150 watts and tvto.marked F and G were nominally 15 watt fluorescent tubes. Lamp "A" has been made available for further study, Filament Lamps A.B.C.D and E, a) Lamp "A" 220V, 8211', Clear Coiled Coil Mounting Very bad, coil pitch uneven due apparently to stretch on mounting. Coil is out of one loop and this defect was present when lamp was purchased. Loops appear hand-made and badly inserted. Nickel lead wire badly bent and distorted, Capping Wire exposed in top contact. The side wire has been are-welded but is now disconnected, As in the other lamp of this type the copper lead to the centre contact appears smaller in diameter than that to the side, b) Lamp "B" 220V 82;T, Pearl Coiled Coil Sealing'-in Bad shape top appears to be blown out, Capping Soldering had been used instead of arc-gelding for the side contact, but the finished Job is poor in appearance,, Cap appears to be zinc-coated steel, c) Lamp "C" 220V, 8Z7, Clear Coiled Coil Mounting Very bad, Coil pitch very uneven due apparently to /stretch,,..... SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6 rr, Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6 25X1 SECRET --2- stretch, Supports- upports pen ed nted but the advantage of the 25X1 construction completely wasted by too narrow lead spacing and insufficient angle of support. Clamps badly made,. Cam Crooked, Top soldering poor, Wire exposed, Cap appears to be zinca#coated steel. Cement appears under- baked and has run into the well, The side wire is arc-- welded. No evidence of fusing although the copper lead to the centre contact is smaller in diameter than the other, (Accidentally broken). d) Lamp "D" 220V, 82W. 900 lrns. Pearl Coiled Coil Sealing-4 Bad shaped top, blown out. C appin& Soldering has been used for side contact - appearance is fair. Cap appears to be zinc-ooated steel. e) Lamp "E" 22OV. 150~1, Internal White Finish Side Coil Sealing-in Slightly blown top. Capp Soldering used and the appearance is satisfactory. The cap seems to be zinc-coated steel, f) INITIAL PHOTOMETRIC READTTGS and PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS A B C D E VOLTS 22 0 220 22 0 220 220 AMPS 0.359 0.366 0095 0,356 0.637 WATTS (actual) 7 9.0 80.5 8 6.9 ;3 140.1 WATTS (nominal) 8 2 82 8 2 82 150 LUMENS (actual) 85 9 869 97 0 768 1486 B.S.I. nominal lumens 104 0 1040 104 0 1040 2090 LIIVWATT 1 0.88 10.79 1 1.16 9,81 10.60 Overall length 12 1 128.,5 12 1 127 172 Light-centre length 9 0 95 9 0 94 Internal White Fluorescent Tubes F and a) Coate; very poor, thin and non--uniform. b) Colour; similar to "daylight" standard. 1(o) Physical dimensions....,,,,,, SECRET 25X1 9853 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6 SECRET c) Physical dimensionst i) Overall length of both F and G just complies with specification. ii) Orientation of cap pins: F 50 error G 150 error (F---] specifies 6? maximum error) 25X1 solder too far up pins. The that it fails to run properly, 5. An expert in lamp manufacture has coi.u,iented "The general quality is so bad that one wonders whether they are really representative of Russian manufacture, yet the manner of their purchase suggests that they must be, It is interesting to note that coiloddooil filaments are usedt ir.iplying a good quality tungsten and competent metallurgy and wire-drawing techniques., quite out of keeping with the quality of the finished product." SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/05/25: CIA-RDP80T00246AO42000440001-6