PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE SITUATION WITH RESPECT TO REPATRIATION OF PRISONERS OF WAR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80R01731R003200010023-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
13
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 5, 2005
Sequence Number: 
23
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 19, 1951
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80R01731R003200010023-5.pdf561.98 KB
Body: 
Copy 18 of copies Approved For Release 2006/03/17 : CIA-RDP80R0l731 R003200010023-5 TOP SMOR1 T PSYCrIOLOGICA:r, STRATEGY BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C. ME'TORANDUM FOR: THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL , Y6 )k October 19, 1951 SUBJECT: Preliminary report on the Situation with Respect to Repatriation of Prisoners of War 1. At the Senior. Security Council St:,.ff Meeting of Septo:,r 27, in connection with the discussion of United States courses of action Korea, it was agreed that "the Psychological Strategy Board would a.a.-a-iortake at once to prepare a pi el-ininary report on the position of the iced States with respect to repatriation and to exchange of prisoners c` war". This problem was first officially posed in a Joint Chiefs of memorandum for the Secretary of Defense, dated F, August 1951, ,a r oct: "Policy on Repatriation of Chinese and North Korean .Pri,oon _ rs,~ .!t-'stance of this memorandum is described in Enclosure "A", Staff 5.,a of Repatriation of Prisoners of War in Korea. 2, In pursuance to this agreement I have had ray staff prepare a staff study with recommendations on this subject, Enclosure "A". In the preparation of this staff study, PSB received the advice of Mr. Raymund Yingling and Mr. Arthur B. Emmons of Department of State, Major J D chell, Office of the Secretary of Defense and CIA, as well as the following outside Consul a n s. a. Mr. Paul M. A. Linebarger b. Mr. Charles A. H. Thomson. 3. During the period of preparation of this staff study the following, related actions occurred: a. The Secretary of State commented upon the Joint Chiefs of staff memorandum to the Secretary of Defense by letter, August 2?, 1951. The substance of these comments, which differed in several essential respects with the views of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is contained in Enclosure "A". b. The Secretary of Defense addressed a memorandum on this subject to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which requested the incorporation of his views into a re-exami-Aation of the problem by the Joint Chiefs of Sta.f?. The substance of these comments appears also in Enclosure "A". 4. Enclosure "A" was prepared by the PSB Staff taking into cens.ira, tion the aforementioned papers and advice. 5. Subsequent to the completion of this staff study, the Joint Chiefs of Staff met (on 12 October) to reconsider this subject. On the basis of decisions taken at that meeting the Joint Chiefs of Staff addressed a memorandun to the Secretary of Defense, 15 October 1951, Subject: "Policy on Repatriation of Chinese and North Korean Prisoners" in which the Joint Chiefs of Staff indicated that: NSC review(s) completed. Approved For Release 200610311JV qj,~9RP80R01731 R003200010023-5 Approved For Release 2006/03/17 : CIA-RDP80R01731 R003200010023-5 a.. They accede to the views of the Secretary of State that "our best hope for obtaining the prompt repatriation of United Nations personnel in the Korean war, as well as future wars, lies in our con- tinuing firm adherence to the terms of the Geneva Convention," b. They recommended the withdrawal of the proposed policy as set forth in their memorandum of 8 August 1951, "pending further con- sideration". Co They are obtaining General Ridgway's views before preparing a new recommendation, d, They now consider that these policies can be resolved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff with the Departments of State and Defense without referring them to the National Security Council, 6, In the course of a Electing of the Interdepartmental Committee on '::Lsoners of War, Mr. Yingling discussed the PSB staff study in order to eb+,ain their views. a. Memibers of the committee informally reiterated the necessity of koeping small the number of enemy prisoners of war released by us prior to the cessation of hostilities. This point is made in the staff study b. They objected to the idea of undertaking to resettle releasc.. prisoners of war outside Korea. The staff study has been amended to eliminate this recomi'iendation. c, They objected to giving any publicity to the release of prisoners of war. The staff study has not been changed to meet this criticism, inasmuch as it would defeat the psychological purpose of re- leasing such persons. 7, The PSB staff study (Enclosure "A") agrees with both the Joint Chiefs of Staff memorandum of 15 October, and the Secretary of State letter of August 27, to the effect that upon the cessation of hostilities the UN commander must abide by the provisions of the Genova Convention of 194.9, requiring the repatriation of prisoners of war.. The PSB staff study is, however, more specific with respect to actions to be taken prior to cessa- tion of hostilities, as well as psychological actions which might be taken to assist in the protection of US/UN Prisoners of Wax, RECOI IEITDATIONS: 8, It is recommended that the PSB staff study be made available to the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff in connection with any future consideration they may wish tc give to this subject. 9. It is further recommended that PSB take no further action in this matter until requested by the National Security Council. Gordon Gray Director Enclosure: Staff Study TOP SECRET Approved For Release 2006/03/17 CIA-RDP80R01731 R003200010023-5 Approved For Release 3 6 1t7T?- CIA-RDP80R0l731 R003200010023-5 18 October, 1951 18 Copy of 20 Copies PSYCHOLOGICAL STRATEGY BOARD STAFF STUDY ON REPATRIATION OF PRISONERS OF OF WAR IN XOE a, I. THE PROBLEM From the standpoint of psychological strategy to recommend U.S. policies governing the repatriation and exchange of prisoners of war in Korea. II. FACTS BEARING ON THE PROBLEM 1. The U.S. is a signatory of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of August 12, 1949, but has not yet ratified the Convention. 2. Official views are set forth as follows: a. View of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (1) By memoranda-i to the Secretary of Defense, 8 August 1951, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff indicated that from the military point of view, no objection. was raised by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the adoption of a policy authorizing the UN commander: (a) Not to repatriate Chinese or North Korean prisoners of war to Communist-controlled territory without their hill consent; (b) To repatriate to Formosa all Chinese prisoners of war who were found to be acceptable to the Chinese Nationalist Government and who claim to be ex- Nationalists or Nationalists at heart and elect such repatriation; The adoption of such policies to be subject to the provi- sion of adequate safeguards for United Nations prisoners S T U D Approved For Release 2006/03/17 : CIA-RDP80R01731 R003200010023-5 Approved For Release 2006/03/17TbF1AA OR01731 8003200010023-5 in Communist hands. b. View of the Secretary of State. (1) By letter, August 27, 1951 to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State reviewed the 8 August 1951 memorandum by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He expressed serious concern over the feasibility of carrying out the proposed policy without conflicting with the Geneva Prisoner of War Convention of 1949. He suggested that, in order to achieve the desired psychological warfare and humanitarian objectives, individuals who had rendered outstanding assistance to the United Nations command or whose return to the Communists would in all probability result in their deaths should be paroled an provided for in the Geneva Convention prior to the reaching of an armistice agreement. (2) Additionally, the Secretary of State indicated that under no circumstances should Republic of Korea person- nel who were forcibly pressed into the North Korean army (and subsonuently recovered by UN forces) be re- turned to the Communists;. c. View of the Socrotary of Defense: By memorandum to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 25 September 1951 the Secretary of Defense indicated that while he recognized the military advantages inherent in General Ridgway's present instructions, authorizing him to negotiate an exchange of prisoners of war on a one- for-one basis, he felt that, in order to avoid any solution which might involvo bargaining with the wel- fare of our own prisoners, General Ridgway should be ad- Approved For Release 2006/03/IQR J? P80R01731 R003200010023-5 Approved For Release 2006/03/17 : CIA-RDP80R01731 R003200010023-5 TOP v.U IPYST vised initially to soak exchange of prisoners of war on a ono-for-one basis but that he be authorized to agree to an overall ecchango, if such action were deemed necessary in order to effect the release of our own prisoners of war. III. DISCUSSION See TAB A. IV.. CONCLUSIONS 1. There is no perfect safeguard to prevent Communist reprisals against US/UN POW's short of forcibll lib- orating than,. However, expectations with respect to reprisals can be greatly influenced by the specific psychological actions we take to put the Hostile Power in a defensive position with respect to the treatment of prisoners of war (See TAB B). 2. It appears from the Convention that parole of POW's prior to the cessation of hostilities, as recommended by the Secretary of State, can be accomplished in accor- dance with the Geneva Prisoner of War. Convention of 1.949. implication, prisoners of war can be Furthermore, by given the right of voluntary release without parole prior to cessation of hostilitle$. The genuineness of the voluntary character of the release can best be shown by inspection and observance by a neutral body such as the International Red Cross. 3. An all-for-.-tll principle of prisoner exchange offers a better chance of the return of US/UN prisoners of war than does any :Limited one-for-one method of exchange. However, for administrative purposets CINCUNC might well Approved For Release 2006/03/17 :CIA-l. 80R01731 R003200010023-5 Approved For Release 2006/03/1 &MOR01731 R003200010023-5 be advised to exchange ?prisonors group-for-group, composed of tuixod CCF