THE PARACEL ISLANDS INCIDENT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80M01048A000800330009-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
12
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 19, 2004
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 21, 1974
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80M01048A000800330009-1.pdf540.04 KB
Body: 
Approl For Rel 2,QFIS77 25X1 25X1 01048A000800330009-1 2 , JAP1 1?974 the growing importance of the islands in the South China Sea as a potential source of oil. 1. Our information on the sequance of events that led to this weekend's clash between Chinese and South Vietnamese forces in the Paracels is extremely sketchy. The available record, however, suggests that it was Saigon that took the key initiatives last week. Both sides clearly have been motivated in large measure by 2. The Paracels are a group of small coral islets, reefs, and rocks--none more than one square mile in area. Sovereignty over them, as well as over other island groups in the waters bounded by China, Vietnam and the Philippines, has been a subjact of dispute since early this century. Japan occupied all these islands during the second World Saar. With the signing of the 1951 peace treaty Tokyo renounced claims to,both the Paracels and the Spratly Isl.3nds, which lie south- east of the Paracels; at that time Taipei claimed sovereignty over the Spratlys and the Paracels, the colonial government in Vietnam claimed the Paracels, and the Philippines claimed the Spratlys. Shortly thereafter Peking claimed the Paracels, the Spratlys, and the Macclesfield bank, which lies between them. The South Vietnamese have subsequently claimed that France turned the Spratlys over to them. The Re- public of China maintained a smaLl garrison of islands of the Amphitrite subgroup, the northernmost 25X1 Approved For Rele20'Q/2 01048A000800330009-1 25XI Apprc d For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80M01048A000800330009-1 section of the Paracels, but withdrew its forces in 1950. Since 1955 Peking has garrisoned most of the Amphitrite group, concentrating on Woody Island, which it may intend to develop into a forward base for its southern naval forces. n recent months the Communist Chinese have also constructed. an oil rig on Woody Island. 3. The present trouble dates from a South Vietnam- ese statement issued in September, which reiterated a claim to the Spratlys. Initially Pe}.ing chose to ig- nore this claim, but on January 11 iL: responded with a foreign ministry statement realfirrling the Chinese claim to the Spratlys, the Paracels and the Maccles- field Bank. For the first time Peking also formally claimed the "natural resources in thE! sea around" the islands. At about this time the Chinese also sent some fishermen to the Crescent group, where according to the South Vietnamese, they set up huts and raised the Chinese flag. This apparently was a low-key move designed to assert Pekinq's claim to the Crescent group. 4. At this point Saigon switched its attention from the Spratlys to the Paracels. Early last week it sent a naval force to the Crescent group, with small contingents of marines that landed on islands not normally garrisoned by South Vietnam. These moves apparently forced the withdrawal of the fishermen. The Chinese were evidently prepared for this contin- gency and may well have anticipated it. Following South Vietnamese firing on Chinese fishermen on Dun- can Island on January 16 they dispatched military units south, intervening with sizablE naval and ground forces, as well as with air strikes. On January 18 the South Vietnamese were forced to pull out their naval units, abandoning the marines (who were accom- panied by a US citizen from the Deferse Attache's Office in Da Nang) on the islands. A-RDP80M0 25X 25Xt'~ Appr d For Release 2004710/27 CIA-F DP80M01048A 5. In large part the clash clearly is an outgrowth of the gradually increasing importance of all these is- land groups--an importance based la-gely on the possibility that significant oil deposits may lie in the waters off Indochina. Saigon granted its ;Firs exploratory conces- sions last year for the seas near South Vietnam; Hanoi has been dickering with the Japanese and the Italians on the exploration of the Tonkin Gulf; the Chinese have been moving on their own to net into the offshore oil business. Exploration in disputed areas of the South China Sea will obviously be held up as long as the sovereignty issue is up in the air. All the parties had been moving gingerly up to the :.ast week, however. The real question is which side, through calculation or miscalculation, upset the delicate balance in the Para- cels. 6. The question is somewhat moot, since both sides were becoming more assertive and both clearly were ready to move. The key step in the escalation, however, appears to have been Saigon's military response to the move of Chinese fishermen into the Crescent group. Until this point, although Chinese =orces could (and did) move quickly to the Paracels, Chinese military communi- cations did not reflect an increased; state of alert. Peking did not step up its communications until January 17--the day after the South Vietnamese forced 'the with- drawal of the fishermen. Moreover, Saigon's military activities have been accompanied from the start by a heavy output of public commentary, whereas the Chinese did not comment publicly at all unt:_1 January 19. 7. If the key initiative was Ln fact Saigon's, we can only speculate on South Vietnamese motives. Saigon may simply have decided that even a civilian presence in the Crescent group was ntolerable and that now was the time to make good its claim. It may 25X1` 25Xt Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA- A000800330009-1 WHAT CAUSED THE CLASH? 5. In large part the clash clearly is an outgrowth of the gradually increasing importance of all these is- land groups--an importance based largely on the possibility that significant oil deposits may lie in the waters off Indochina. Saigon granted its first expLoratory conces- sions last year for the seas near South Vietnam; Hanoi has been dickering with the Japanese and the Italians on the exploration of the Tonkin Gulf;- the Chinese have been moving on their own to get int3 the offshore oil business. Exploration in disputed areas of the South China Sea will obviously be held.up as long as the sovereignty issue is up in the air., All the parties had been moving ginaerly up to the last week, however. The real question is which side, th.rougt calculation or miscalculation, upset the delicate-)alance in the Para- cels. 6. The question is somewhat moot, since both sides were becoming more assertive and both clearly were ready to move. The key step in the escalation, however, appears to have been Saigon's military response to the move of Chinese fishermen into the Crescent group. Until this point, although Chinese..Lor_ces could (and did) move quickly to the Paracels, Chine.-,e military communi- cations did not reflect an increase-Al state of alert. Peking did not step up its communications until January 17--the day after the South Viet:narmose forced 'the with- drawal of the fishermen. MoreotJer, Saigon's military activities have been accompanied from the start by a heavy output of public commentary, whereas the Chinese did not comment publicly at all unt!l January 19. 7. If the key initiative was in fact Saigon's, we can only speculate on South Vietnamese motives. Saigon may simply have decided that` even a civilian presence in the Crescent group was intolerable and that now was the time to make good its claim. It may Approved For Release 209` /2 ' f pP80 M 0104811000800330009-1 Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : cIA-RnPRnnnn1048A000800330009-1 have been gambling that once South Vietnamese forces were committed the US would feel constrained to back up its ally. Thieu may possibly ha'?e also felt that action in the Paracels would help divert domestic attention from the measures to strengthen the ,resident that were then before the legislature. 8. The South Vietnamese obviously lack the ability to move back into the Paracels withait Chinese acqui- escence, and we see little possibility that, having gained control, the Chinese will relinquish it. We do not believe, however, that Pekinq will attempt to move into the Spratlys or other islands i'i the area, where the. status quo has not been distzrbel and where the situation is complicated byPhilippi'ie and Nationalist presences. Chinese treatment of the incident has stressed the line that Pekin-c's moves were defensive; now that the Chinese position hay bean assured, Peking will probably stand pat. 9. This judgment is reinforced by Chinese handling of the dispute over the Senkaku islands north of Taiwan, which flared up in late 1971 and early 1972. Many parallels between that dispute and the present one can be found, including the sovereignty question (in this case involving the Japanese and Koreans as well as the Nationalists), and the potential of.large oil reserves beneath the sea. In that instance tae Chinese con- tented themselves with a restatement of their claim to sovereignty, hinting broadly that the issue should be resolved through negotiations delimiting concession areas on the ocean floor. 10. Throughout the whole incident the North Viet- namese have not issued any commentary--even though propaganda from Saigon explicitly invited them to do so and pointed to Hanoi's silence as proof of its lack of independence. Hanoi's reticence is likely to continue, since any line the North Vietnamese take would either offend Peking or undermine North Vietnamese pretensions to sovereignty, or both. Approved For Release' Q ?}/11P"+ 8A000800330009-1 25X1 25X`'., Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : - 1048A000800330009-1 11. At Annex is a detailed chronology on the incident from DIA. 25X'1 Approved For Releas4IAO4f1Wj271:.4IA-RDP80M0iO48AO00800330009-1 25Xi* Approved For Release 2004/10/27: CIA-RDP80M1? b48A000800330009-1 The Paracel Islands in the South China Sea PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC C3= CHINA CHINA ,Taipei :EPUBLIC OF CFI INA TAIWAN { MALAYSIA ((WEST) / i ~ONESIA ioo spo Mue ~$UMATRA SEA Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80M01048A000800330009-1 Approd For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80M01048A000800330009-1 Paracel Islands S O U T H CRESCENT GROUP South China Sea Pattie Robert.,,y r ,) Triton ?~yurummunu Moneyyi Duncan ' Discovery Reef martrn Passu Kea .Tree AMPHITRITE r~x GROUP R Rocky Woody-* C-11 h", I /V A Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80M01048A000800330009-1 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80MO1048A000800330009-1 Next 4 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80MO1048A000800330009-1 ~~ .?:i 'i e4 ..7-0 'Le. A-1- S . ~t. "'?/~"^~".~ tT? ~? 1S?.i ._.~-?~J r~_ l-l~l~_.~~ /fAAA/AA/A7 /1I A? 1-ll'11'10A111{A..AAQ/6AA%-AAA?f 7./~AA~i -.S- .J+w that they are accomplices of -Communist China.,, British radar at Hong Kong at 0345 EDT reported the movement of some 17 probable BEAGLE jet light bombers from Leiyang Air- field in the.western sector of Kuangchou to probable Siliihsi, the southernmost airfield on the China mainland. Altitudes ranged from 24,000-48,000 feet with ground speeds computed as 300 knots (350 mph). This movement was reported complete by 0550 EDT. . At 0407 EDT CCOMSEVENTBFLT ordered all units to stay "well clear" of the Paracel area and "avoid actions which could be-construed as participating in or providing support. for that action." As of 0800 EDT news of the actual military conflict had not reached the Saigon press. ? Even so some GIN newspapers condemned the NVN for keeping silent about the- Chinese encroachment into the Paracels "while proclaiming that they were struggling for independence and sovereignty -- this shows At 0815 EDT DACE Saigon reported GVN ships HQa 4, 5 and 16 proceeding toward Da Nang. with damaged main gun mounts, while HQs 11 (Patrol Craft Escort) and three unidentified patrol boats remained in the Crescent Group area. Total casualties were set at eight KIA, 39 WIA, ani. 79 MIA. At-1021 EDT SIG ENT sources disclosed that the US Recon platform providing collection on the Paracel island situation aborted due to on board egu".pment malfunction noting that no other collector would be available to resume surveillance until 1645 EDT. By 1045 EDT the DAO placed HQs 11 and her three patrol boats patrolling three to 16 kilometers off Pattie Island with 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80MO1048A000800330009-1 Next 3 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80MO1048A000800330009-1 Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80MO1048A000800330009-1 MEMORANDUM FOR: _,DDdi Attached is the response to Dr. Kissinger's request for information on the Paracels. It was LDX'd to the White Hduse at noon today. 25X1 (DATE) fO-01 MAY FORM FORM GN 54 IDI WHICH REPLACES 1 AU Approved For Release 2004/10/27 : CIA-RDP80MO1048A000800330009-1