LETTER TO THE HONORABLE DANIEL K. INOUYE FROM GEORGE BUSH

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
33
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 12, 2003
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 20, 1977
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4.pdf1.69 MB
Body: 
Approved For- glease 2004/02/19: CIA-RDP80MO016Q0, Qgf20 % 06 1". i;, 1 -4j ------ A-- ILLEGIB 2 0 JAN 1977 Sincerely, sf George Bush 25X1 The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Mr. Chairman: I E"Cudvo PWS.Istry 7~/ Thank you for your letters of November 29 and December 20, 1976, received on 5 January 1977, acknowlec?rling our notification on releases of funds from our Reserve for Contingencies. we have now received Office of 1anagement and Budget approval for the release of from the Reserve for Contingencies for funding of the Presiden ialr inr, ing of December 3, 1976. Our notification to the Committee of this fact is furnished in the interest of keeping the Committee fully and currently informed with respect to withdrawals from the Reserve. As you know, the notification and briefing process of the Committee on operations requiring Presidential Findings under the Flughes-Ryan Amendment and involving withdrawal from the Contingency Reserve are overlapping. First, when a Finding is made the Co mittee is immediately notified of that fact, the country involved and the amount and source of funding required. Second, at the convenience of the Committee the Director of Central Intelligence provides a more detailed report on the scope and description of the operation. Finally, the Committee is notified of the fact that the Office of Management and Budget has approved a release from the Reserve for Contingencies and the amount approved. I believe the procedures outlined, above assure that the Committee is kept fully and currently informed on these matters and provide in a timely fashion the information required by the Committee to fulfill its responsibilities. I would like to take this opportunity to note my observation that Agency officers and members of your Committee and staff have a very close and candid working relationship. I am confident that this kind of cooperation will continue to the benefit of both the Agency and the Committee. Crig dresses E - rolved" 2elgasef 904102/ CIA-RDP80M001gA66&e6 i2006b4n i fished Approved Fo el LkiZO I/UF/119.t R13PAOMM5A0906001.?MU-. ?__~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 C- OLC 76-3315/b Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate Washington, D, C. 20510 In response to your letter of 11 November x.976 concerning the propriety and consequences of CIA's liaison with foreign intelligence services, I met with Bill Miller on 29 November 1976 to discuss how the Agency might satisfy the Committee's needs in this highly sensitive area. Mr. Miller elaborated on the Committee's interests, and I agreed to provide the Committee a paper discussing the principal questions of concern which he identified. Enclosed is a memorandum covering these points. I would be happy to discuss this matter with you further. Sincerely, E. H. Knoche Acting Director 25X1 Downgraded to Unclassified when separated from Enclosure Distribution: Orig - Adse 1 - Acting DCI 1 - OLC/Subj I - ER 1 - OLC / Chrono OLC/D:'F M/ksn 21 Jan 77 ryA wIA+*" Approved For Releast 2004/02/19: C1A-RDP80 M 00165A000600120002-4 ILLEGIB ()U)TloZV m v~ :~ ."te"a ~ 2 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4 Next 4 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4 Approved For Release 20Q4/Q2/1$ CIA-RDP80M00165A0600120002-4 CI NTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OLC 76-3315/b 1 JAN 11177 :>u vw 3'Claistry I would be happy to discuss this matter wi.f:h you further. Sincerely, Honorable Daniel K,. Inouye, Chairman Select Con-unittee on Intelligence United States Senate Washington, D. C. 20510 Dear Mr. Chairman: In response to your letter of 11 Novernber 1976 concerning the propriety and consequences of CIA's liaison %,-,;h foreign intelligence services, I met with Bill Miller on 29 November 19/6 to discuss how the Agency Haight satisfy the Committee's needs in i{hiis highly ~.ens:~ti_ve area. Mr. Miller elaborated on the Committee's interests, and I agreed to provide the Committee a paper discussing the principal questions of concern which he identified. Enclosed is a.na.emora.ndum point:_:. covering these E. 11. Knoche Acting Director 25X1 Enclosure Downgraded to Unclassified _ when separated from Enclosure Distribution: Orig - Ads c 1 - Acting DCI 1 - OLC/Subj. 1-ER 1-OLC/Ctirono- OLC/DI-M/ksn 21 Jan 77 Approved For Release c, e is ;'`, , Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4 Next 11 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4 Approved For Rele Approved For Rele jqf~M.+AlI ?Y00 5A0006001200 - 4w TO: ER ROOM NO. BUILDING REMARKS: FROM: ROOM NO. BUI DI G T se 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165 O0O66OO1200 I FORM NO 24 1 REPLACES FORM 36-8 FEB 55 WHICH MAY BE USED. Approved For Release 2004/02/19 CIA-RDP80M00165A0UO600T2QDU2=41 ROOM NO. BUILDING EXTENSION Approved Fbr ReleasFNwl Qq /19 :W ,M00165A00060012000214 TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE 5/13/77 TO: OLC/Sue ROOM NO. BUILDING REMARKS: At your conveni ence, please check status of this memo. ER 77-6210 Thanks/ Sophie/ER FROM: Aaarov==ele a 2004/02/19: CIA-RDP80M00165A0 0600120002-4 Mr. E. Henry Knoche SELECT COMMITTEE OM INTELI.IGENCM (!" YRsuAsr TO s. Rts, 4*. MTw ceetanC3s) WASHINGTON. D.C. 20510 February 4, 1977 Acting Director of Central Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D. C, 20505 Questions have been raised recently in the press conflict of interest provisions in the executive branch to employees of United States intelligence agencies. The Select Committee on Intelligence would very much appreciate a description of the conflict of interest, .provisions which apply to employees of intelligence agencies tinder your cognizance and the differences, if any, between these provisions and those applicable to (see attached article) about the applicability of 'less sensitive government agencies! Enclosure laniel K. noUye Chairman A Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4 Cni#e .~ a cz . iencxf e UNCLA551FIE1-':CONFIDENTIAL: SECRET Appfbg_ For R6IaHI4/02/:h RD 040 QOQ01~4 ;. ~.- :''E CUTIV SE TABIAT. .;-- - ACTION '? INFO .-'DATE INITIAL 1 /DCI . a X ~. mar= , 2 A (ocI: i - X -~' 3 D/DCI/IC X 4 DDS&T- ~~ .. = X 5 DDt r 6 DDA :: 7 DDO.-4 ` 8 D/ DCI/NI ( ,, ~~ 10 LC X 12 Compt a t 13 D/Pium M 14 D/5 15 DTIi 16 Asst/DCI ..X. 17 AO/DCI 18 C/IPS 19 20 21 22 DCI/ x5 D/EEO x 25X1 4ppr,oved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A0006001-20002-4' f , Routing Slip UNCLASSIFIED IFIDENTIAL ApprovedFor Release 04!0211 - PBDMOOi6571 201 D/EEO 25X1 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4 Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4 DANIEL K, U E f#AWL11J,aCJ,R,htlli~. se 2004/02/19 :I 80M01,~ JAKE Fi~J1YtS7a`{~I,/t _C; A~R k1 OIRCH BAYH, IND. CLIFFORD P. CASE, J, ADLAI E. STEVENSON, ILL. STROM THURMOND, S.C. WILLIAM D. HATHAWAY. MAINE MARK O. HATFIELD, OREG. WALTER D. HUDDLESTON. KY. BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., DEL. ROBERT T. STAFPORD. VT. ROBERT MORGAN, N.C. CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS, JR., MD. GARY HART, COLO. TOP SECRET ' J CnUeb %fafez, .. enctf e SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE (PURSUANT TO S. RES. 400. IIITH CONGRESS) WASHINGTON, D.G. 20510 February 25, 1977 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO R#6614 Adm. Stansfield Turner Director of Central Intelligence Designate Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D. C. 20505 I have received the November 30 letter of Mr. Cary indicating the opposition of the CIA to the release to Ambassador Edward M. Korry of his executive session testimony of February 24, 1976 before the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. It is my intention to raise the question of providing Mr. Korry with a copy of his testimony with the full Select Committee on Intelligence. For this purpose I would like to have your objections to specific portions of the testi- mony, release of which you believe would jeopardize national security or intelligence sources and methods. 25X1 The Select Committee staff has reviewed the Korry transcript and marked certain portions for deletion. Among these are those portions suggested by the CIA in a letter to Senator Church of March 31, 1976. The staff has also marked certain language related to 25X1 25X1 which apparently was overlooked in t He Agency's initial revi e staff marked for deletion the names of I Iwhen it appeared that Ambassador Korry himse wis e to have these people protected. Approved Fob- " Release TOP SECRET C~Opy r15 00 /0 /'!9 (A; 1 1q 0165A000601J12 Approved For RqWAiW2b04/0fft%" TOP SECRET Adm. Stansfield Turner February 25, 1977 Page 2 I am providin& you again with a copy of the transcript and with a copy of the deletions discussed above so that the Agency will have every opportunity to express its views as to the release of the transcript or any portions of the transcript. I hope, however, that you will attempt to be as specific as possible in your comments. The Committee's release of his transcript to Ambassador Korry would not constitute an endorsement of his testimony, but it would raise the possibility that the transcript would be read by persons not cleared for access to classified material. I am concerned, therefore, that specific facts not now publicly known, release of which is likely-to be substan- tially harmful to the national security or to the personal security of any person, should be deleted from the trans- cript prior to its release. I would appreciate your assistance. Enclosures TOP SECRET Approved F- Refea100i4Q2l~ PNQ0165A000600120002-4 UNCLASSIFIED when b 4 GQ dS?br ReJhasetf210 k/Q~/i~p: # t Bi~MO@46 ~~Qtl~Oi~AI^ or declassi- fied when filled in form is detached fro'lKcontrolled document. CONTROL AND COVER SHEET FOR TOP SECRET DOCUMENT DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION REGISTRY SOURCE CIA CONTROL NO. g DOC. NO. DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED DOC. DATE S o 77 ' i.__._ COPY NO. 90/ '. LOGGED BY NUMBER OF PAGE tft"t #. 'E4ti*71i1~ NUMBER O~F9 ATTACHMENTS ATTENTION: This form will be placed on top of and attached to each Top Secret document received by the Central Intelligence Agency or classified Top Secret within the CIA and will remain attached to the document until such time as it is downgraded, destroyed, or transmitted outside of CIA. Access to Top Secret matter is limited to Top Secret Control personnel and those individuals whose official duties relate to the matter. Top Secret Control Officers who receive and/or release the attached Top Secret material will sign this form and indicate period of custody in the left-hand columns provided. Each individual who sees the Top Secret document will sign and indicate the date of handling in the right-hand columns. REFERRED TO RECEIVED RELEASED SEEN BY OFFICE SIGNATURE DATE TIME DATE TIME SIGNATURE OFFICE/DIV. DATE 25X1 NOTICE OF DETACHMENT: When this form is detached from Top Secret material it shall be completed in the appropriate spaces below and transmitted to Central Top Secret Control for record. DOWNGRADED DESTROYED DISPATCHED (OUTSIDE CIA) TO BY (Signature) TO BY (Signature) WITNESSED BY (Signature) BY (Signature) OFFICE q ?o IFSved For e?lease 2004/02/19: CI ~tII5P80M00 A&0600120002-4 DATE TOP SECRET FORM 26 u8E PREVIOUS EDITIONS. TOP SECRET (40) 6-73 Approved For Rase 2004/02/19: CIA-RDP80M001654W06 THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505 Office of Legislative Counsel OLC 76-3246/a 3 0 NOV 1976 Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate Washington, D. C. 20510` -C 39,E This is in response to your request of 5 November 1976 for the position of this Agency on the release to former Ambassador Korry of his 24 February 1976 testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Government Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. As your letter indicates, in April of this year CIA objected to release of any part of this testimony to former Ambassador Korry. Our position has not changed. Release to former Ambassador Korry is equivalent to public release. This Agency has consistently opposed the public release and discussion of sensitive intelligence operations, such as the program discussed in considerable detail in this testimony. This position is consistent with the responsibility of the Director of Central Intelligence to protect intelligence sources and methods t ruin unauthorized disclosure and the view of this Agency that. public discussion of such activities simply is contrary to the interests of the Goveernment. Sincerely, George L. Cary Legislative Counsel Distribution: Orig - Adse 1 - A/DDCI 1 - Mr. Elder, Ex. Sec. CFI 1 - OLC/Subj P4-'- OLC / Chrono OLC/DFMVM/ksn (23 Nov 76 Retyped: (29 Nov 76) Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4 ve F~ a 2c~641 211 !'CIA' SECR_T 20002-4 w Routing Slip 8 D/DCI/Nl 9 GC /o encl 10 LC X 11 IG 12 Comet c o enc w 2 1DDCI X w /o encl 3 D/DCI/IC 4 DDS&T F 5 DDI 6 DDA DDO . X o enc1 17 AO/DCI 18 C/IPS DCI/SS 19 20 D/EEO 21 .22 EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT ACTION INFO DATE Please develop DCI response. Approved :For Release 2004/02/19 `: C-IA-RDP8OM00y 002-4 l l 25X1 ate D 3637 (7-76) Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : IC A-RDP8PM00165A000600120002-4 25X1 pproved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RD, P. NO FORM IOI EDITIONS PREVIOUS 00120002-4 Approved F0s?. UNCLASSIFIED EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT Routing Slip ACTION 1 L11 L 6 Ll 7 10 LC ` r ~? cases 11 IG 9 C. 8 1131 'D/Pens a 12 ccmpt ~~~ 16 Asst/DCI H ~~ D/EEO 21 17 MDCIISS i8 19 FJEEV4EJ 22 SU SPENSE Remarks: cM'77 ADDroved For Release 2004/02/19: CFA-RDP80M001' ?l e'cleei~~~ respanse. viarca 197, 25X1 Approved For Rely Dk4iSIK - I~14 LP80MOO165AO0000600 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 2 4 F The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Mr. Chairman: i ec th' RP.' With reference to your letter of 14 February, enclosing a Manchester Guardian article speculating as to the-possibility of CIA involvement in the building of new airfiel?ds in Rhodesia: I wish to assure you that no covert U.S. assistance is being provided to Mr. Ian Smith for the building of airfields or for any other purpose, and there is no basis for Mr. Smith to anticipate any such assistance. We have had intelligence reports of Rhodesian construction at eight airfields over the past year. Sincerely, E. H. Knoche Acting Director Distribution: Original - addressee 1 - Acting DCI 1 - Asst/DCI E R 1 - OLC Su sect 1 - OLC Chrono 1 -- OLC/C&R/Chrono OLC/C&RII hvm (typed 18 February 1977) Retyped:O/ADCI:skm (24 Feb 1977).- 'I 25X1 Approved For Release ~~Ifq:?t ltj5:lqzrpprMO0165tOOO6OOl2OOO2-4 >V6~~11~71 ?? .Yr?YN~4 ~. A: !,n ~~"~??A. v4 _.~j.Y-~~.t?~ Y:Jr~`~'?.-? . _ .. ..- 4r ''.; xirl?#iv.l tir_Rel aie.2004/0 1%: CIA-RDP80M00165AQ006Ob1200132-4 to Jn~3s1C~ : ~Z t -. p. for /!~ tai ~4 TyR?il*`' :: ;: -- - ? ?~~ ~? ~??~ impiement the Kissinger agreement that if Mr Smith does contemplate the ? ?. new British conference terms was the unilaterally with so-called, African unthinkable and go back on hiy rejec- 1; genuine surprise with whtch'Mr Ivor 'moderates. What does matter is how tion;'they might ponder the incredible Richard.reacted to the demolitiiin' of South Af a i r c reacts to such md Afic' fi oves, anrasirst whte military coup, his hopesf for an,'early:returnto on the dour face of Mr John Vorster 'Whither Rhodesia? The Govern, Geneva- there is = in Rhodesian eyes the _ment remains in a precarious pasibon. There are cynics in Salisbury who silent smile of assent The security forces are stretched tight -? feel thaf"the conference' chairman ': B a ~__.t _ . e Sith ,m his - -' of C'P "'??p- looking for covert American assistance Jl~ pointment to increase the burden of - Britain's envoy to the United Nations. things. thq way of the Central haulm went four wear? mnnatm Intelligence Agency. After all, white r, secondment to the Rhodesia con- ratio is oir unism not ference, was genuinely saddened and fighting atio co a hurt by ivhat he rp,.ar,1a. tl 6 GIIft s . but he probably soon on will l be), and who another settlement saga,. "11"1 1719 rnose lour new undeniably Mr Richard was truly convinced strategic airfields that have emerged in -that the Rhodesian leader would, convinced ,the bush recently? If journalists ask in ur Salisbury these days about the air- the end of "11-of the best years of o , fields, officials tend to gaze fixidly at lives, " gracefully bow to the historic ;.7 _ _ , ? recalcitrant cousin whose-rebellious ?'-' -F_ between the majority and the v my a massive chap a of heart by ganisa on o "The past is another country, The _tion in the world and he is going to African Unity will accept what they "things differently there." ' ?' ? f ?? stick. to.: it. More importantly, the see a3 .a half-way settlernent.'r..' Rhodesian security forcess will fight for g r so cop-i Richard may reflect on i.. P. Hartley's forced settlement terms,.. then Nlr veniently provided, and there is limp= words, which were not written en about, -Smith certainly did. He made an ly no way that most Rhodesian ab agreement with the most powerful na- nationalists or the Or f f Rhodesia but might well have been, ? refused the comforts of the fold. Mr Smith sees no salvation in the -. The an with whom Mr Smith in- Buried deep in the Foreign Office surrender of white power and privilege, tends to conduct this exercise, Bishop files must be, a scribbled memoran- t' However, such realities did come as Abel Muzorewa, has resisted all bian-ments dum from a departing mandarin who a surprise to Mr Richard, who was government. to hold any talks with the raked against the lunacy of such perhaps a little too forthright for the find t n-the end, the diplomacy towards the rebel regime. Foreign Office's taste in recognising the Bishop may find that he needs Mr Nothing would or will force Mr Smith, :end of the road when he came to it.:' Smith as much as the Prime Minister his Cabinet, his white electorate and Although Whitehall seems to be ur' _ needs him.,.,; ,;_.. i rd " the arm to accept pnfettered African ` ins g We have never closed the door, It is y a the battered British conference , Wilson.who has been doing that for the rule except for morale-busting team into further negotiations with Mr '.last four months." Mr Smith said that .pressure of the kind that can break a Vorster, the Geneva conference cannot on March 27,1966. Substitute Richard government's will- to. resist its- own 'be resumed with' the "reasonable -,for Wilson and exactly the same words destruction; #t,-' b P ; rosPects for success" which the characterise the Government's as The pressure was there.: last Foreign Secretary requires for second- titude to the constitutional issue. It is .September, applied by South. Africa stage talks in Switzerland. The Rhode- always somebody else's fault. Nothing and America, but if Dr Kissinger did. sain Government has nailed its colours changes. Both Mr Wilson and Mr not see the gaping loopholes in his en- to the mast which Dr Kissin e , e y ?`"'""p ? Minister that happiness was a hand- - power- transferri reason laced with dire threats of pain- ng, transitional behaviour could, and would. be tamed -- -- ,s, vursla s militarr - - - '??~ `~+ A.LA ~/ 1~J ` . !1. r. 3:,iS9 -53:cn?i;,- r7 '5 lr:2C,C, r t: :?i.:` n? , ~?ri.:, _ . r, y - ? .-, . ?. . dG ` -' '''' ?, :~a, : rio3t o '~Ret 2flQ4fO ~19~*~ 4At= R8o d?11~6k~?@ot~fl i oi~U$ shin r::_._~%s.__..zy t c' ?,: ai _ ?f_ -- -taken-1h e~natiQn-b.v_storm tsecause, as Mr Richard pointed out at Geneva, several times, no reasonable among the regular forces, but elsewhere morale varies from the !"shoot it out to the last cartridge" can- didates to the young married couples with small children' who are openly- = fearful of the future, It is the question of morale, rather than, of military defeat, that most. concerns the authorities: The emigration rate, totallinga net Ions pf 6,000 Rhodesians last year, can only'get worse. In the industrial and :_ . commercial sectors confid ence th ss emselves "" think? Who else?" - - " -- ` caught between fear of radical None of this will corneas a surprise ' nationalist rule and a future without - to such African leaders as President an, internationally recognised settle., -white minority. to unending warfare with guerrillas representing a restless, Nyerere of Tanzania who have long - menu.? :. ?.. -rebellious majority,,',:-r? -looked on in appalled silence -as Mr Smith is therefore expected to This was.a miscalculation as fatal as successive British envoys trailed out to move with reasonable speed to meet at Britain's. persistent misreading, of Salisbury to tell the Rhodesian Prime least . some requirements of the politician could commit a dispirited white politics in Rhodesia. From the r ' racial; discrimination (but not, one moment that a cold-ridden Mr Smith huskily declared UDI at-1.15 pm on tl~/'.)ames MacMenus``, notes, the most contentious eon. November 11. 1965, he was treated by .. - . blatantly requirement to abolish the the British Government as a in $aliSbu '-- - . blatantly unfair. division of land :a power-sharing and ultimat l Approved For Ruse 2004/OF I [ I tM00165AQW60 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate Washington, D. C. 20510 Dear Mr. Chairman: ocv v. .ga~Vy o your letter of 14 February, enclosing a Manchester Guard article speculating as to the possibility of CIA invo vement in the building of new airfields in Rhodesia: ish to assure you that no covert U. S. assistance is be ''g provided to Mr. Ian Smith for the building of airfield, or for any other purpose, and there is no basis for Mr Smith to anticipate any such assistance. We have had inte igence reports of Rhodesian construction at eight airf ire ds over the past year. Sincerely, . H. Knoche Acting Director 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4`7>>s 196" ^ UNCLASSIFIA~ Q It "4AL ~ & LJ SECRET roveC r RIBWbY2004/02/19: CIA-RD M 20002-4 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optional) Manchester"Guardian article FROM: EXTENSION NO. ST OLC 6 ATE A TO. (Officer designation, room number, and building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) RECEIVED FORWARDED 1. Acting DCI 2. t f 4. LL 2. ys.~ 5. 6. 9. 10. 12. 13. 14. 15. Approved For Rel ase 200 4/02/19 : IA-RDP OM00165A000600120002-4 FORM 3-62 61 0 USEDE Sug ^ SECRET F-1 CONFIDENTIAL ^ UINTERNAL SE ONLY ^ UNCLASSIFIED T HOWARDIEL C. INO J ., E W Ie44 or lease 2004/ BIRC7, DA", IND. CLIFFORD P. CASE, NJ. AOLM E. STEVENSON, JR., ILL STROM THURMOND, S.C. WILLIAM D. HATHAWAY, MAINE MARK O. HATFIELD, ORES. WALTER D. HUDOLESTON, KY. BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ. JOSEPH R. BIDER, JR., DEL ROBERT T. STAFFORD, VT. ROBERT MORGAN, N.C. JAKE GARN. UTAH GARY HART, COLO. ' MIKE MANSFIELD. MONT., EX OFFICIO HUGH SCOTT, PA.. EX OFFICIO WILLIAM G. MILLER. STAFF DIRECTOR HOWARD S. LIERENGOOD, MINORITY STAFF DIRECTOR MICHAEL J. MADIGAN, MINORITY COUNSEL 'J Gnzf eb Zf cxfez #encif e SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE (PURSUANT TO B. RES. 400, 11TH CONGRESS) WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510 January 11, 1977 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO P.# 6136 25X1 25X1 The Horiorable George Bush Director of'Central Intelligence Washington, D. C. Dear George: As you know, the Budget. Subcommittee of.the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence will begin the formal budget authorization process toward the end of January. In anticipation of these delibera- tions, the Subcommittee felt it would be to our mutual benefit if the Intelligence Community was advised' 'of our expectations in this regard. The Subcommittee would like to initiate the pro- cess with the DCI presenting two substantive brief- ings in late January. The first should be a_ broad intelligence appraisal of the activities of foreign states which impact on our national security. In particular, the presentation should emphasize significant developments in foreign nation activities in the past year, areas of 'special concern to U. S. national security-in/the future, and how ?intelli-' gence can and cannot contribute to these areas. The second briefing should present a general appraisal of the state of U. S. intelligence. Emphasis here should be focused on major substantive issues facing intelligence planning and current management --- such as: gaps and limitations in intelligence support to decisionmakers; the changes in foreign developments and U. S. decisionmaker needs which are or will impose new demands on intelligence; current and projected intelligence capabilities; and the implications of 25X1 Approved ForteIease 2004/02/19: R 001 The Honorable George Bush. January 11, 1977 Page two these factors for tUie or?gaura.zati.on, personnel, ' campbs- iti an, technolog: cal. invesi me:nt. and performance of U. S. intelligence in th.e raid.-:. (five year) and long- term (ten to fifteen year These sessions will ?, _ followed by a ser~.es of budget hearings with apprupr ia.te in tell.:.F once corrmmun ity officials beginning in early to mid.-February.. It is requested that the, DC