LETTER TO COLONEL STANLEY J. GROGAN FROM LAWRENCE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01676R002800250016-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 17, 2003
Sequence Number: 
16
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 30, 1962
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01676R002800250016-0.pdf965.2 KB
Body: 
LAWRENCE SULLIVAN COORDINATOR STAT Approved For Release 2003/11/04: CIA-RDP80B01676R002800250016-0 U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COORDINATOR OF INFORMATION WASHINGTON, D. C. April 30, 1962 Dear Stan: Mass famine in China marks the Collapse of world communism. Russia is not in famine, but is vastly undernourished. Cuba is in famine. This round-up summarizes public and private intelligence reports over the last eighteen months. Communism simply can not deliver the goods! It is tragic, I think, that the facts on communist agriculture cannot be presented generally in America. Cordial regards. Colonel S rogan Sincerely, ./14-141"--67 LAWRENCE SULLIVAN Coordinator Approved For Release 2003/11/04: CIA-RDP,M11 002800250016-0 What Is Austrian Economics? REV. I. E. HOWARD w SSTUDENTS of freedom are indebted to Mr. Frederick Nymeyer for having. made available several publications of the Austrian school of economics, the last one being Shorter Classics of Eugene von Biihm-Bawerk.* Austrian economics is particularly relevant today because it fur- nishes a penetrating analysis and devastat- ing answer to Marxism. Austrian econom- ics is also noteworthy for having corrected the errors of the English classical school and for having rescued their deductive method from the cheap skepticism of the German historical school of economics. The Austrian school was pioneered by Karl Mengel- of Vienna (1840-1921). ex- panded by Friedrich von Wieser and brought to a climax by Eugene von Bohm- Bawerk (1851-1914) who had the dis- tinction of not only being a professor of economics, but also Finance Minister of Austria. At present, the leading exponent of this school of economics is Ludwig von Mises at New York University. The Austrian criticism of government intervention is much needed at this junc- ture of history, but the heart of the Aus- trian system is the theory of marginal utility. For the serious student, Shorter Classics of Eugene von Bohni-Balverk will provide an excellent introduction to both of these aspects of the Austrian school of thought. In Shorter Classics, Eugene von Bohm- Bawerk applies the theory of marginal utility to several practical problems, in- cluding wage determination. Wages in a condition of free and perfect competition, he explains, would be determined by the value of the product which the last, most easily dispensable laborer of any given type produces for his employer. His wages cannot go higher, for if they do, the em- ployer would gain no advantage by em- ploying this "last" (marginal) laborer and the employer would prefer to reduce the number of workers by one. Neither could the wages he substantially lower for in that case the worker would produce a substan- tial surplus gain and there would be a strong incentive to add another worker, or workers, until the margin was reached in which the last worker barely justified his employment. Wages are determined by this margin. For the modern reader, the effect of labor unions on this analysis immediately becomes a major question. Bohm-Bawerk deals with this in Chapter 111 of Shorter Classics. "Control or Economic Law?" He does not dismiss the power of social con- trol by dogmatically affirming economic law. Rather, he spends pages carefully analyzing all the various effects the power of labor unions and other institutions might have upon economic phenomena and the consequences that would inevi- tably follow. Most readers will grow weary following this economist through a labyrinth of causes and effects, but the quest is worth the effort. After exploring all possible contingencies. Bohm-Bawerk comes to the carefully considered conclu- sion that coercion "can never effect any- thing in contradiction to the economic laws of value, price and distribution; it must always be in conformity with these: it cannot invalidate them; it can merely confirm and fulfill them." Labor unions can raise wages by force. but they never raise them permanently without one, or a combination, of three things happening. In the first place, other factors will enter to increase production, usually technological improvements, which will make it possible for fewer workers to produce more and thus keep the higher wage level won by union coercion, but it will be at the price of unemployment for other workers. Not that workers will be laid off immediately. They will not be re- placed so that eventually a state of equi- librium will be reached with fewer work- ers producing as much as more workers did formerly, but at the higher scale of wages. Thus, the law of marginal utility will triumph. The second alternative is for the cost of living to go up so that the higher wage is an illusion. The worker will be working at the same level of earning power that he was formerly, but more money will be passing through his hands. Inflation is a great deceiver. This alternative is one with which we have become all too familiar during the cost-push inflation of post-war America. Again, economic law triumphs over the coercive power of social control. The third alternative, when some form of social control forces wages above the level justified by economic law, is for the entrepreneur to go out of business. This would have happened to the New Haven railroad had not the government come to its rescue. Other industries have changed their location, which is tantamount to go- ing out of business in the place where con- tinued operation has become economically unsound. When government intervenes with its monopoly on coercion, a new complication is introduced, but economic law is not repealed?as even Russia has discovered. Government intervention can conceal the operation of economic law from the casual observer. hut never ne- gate it. After his careful and extended investi- gation. Eugene von Bohm-Bawerk con- cludes that while labor unions can have many effects upon the social situation. such as hastening changes which would have come more slowly, it is impossible for them permanently to raise real wages. If the truth in this closely reasoned, heavy little book could be communicated to a world that has been dazzled by the errors of Marx, it would prove more rev- olutionary than Das Kapital. The revo- lution it would inspire, however, would he in the spirit of 1776, a revolution of free men against increasing bondage to organ- ized labor and to government, but a revo- lution of ideas not of violence. *Shorter Classics of Eugene von Biihm- Bawerk. Volume I. Libertarian Press, South Holland, Illinois. 1962. 376 pp. $7.50. A Slumbering Giant(ml,lI,Ifrimi Pat:e 2) through one of the great propaganda. brain-washing jobs of history, supported by the Federal Government and many of our universities, to convince people that a corporation is some ugly entity rather than a productive organism owned by living. breathing. voting people who have in- vested their savings in its progress. The problem arises from the fact that very little counter-education has been un- dertaken in challenging the thesis that a corporation is simply a juicy lemon to be squeezed by labor and taxing authorities. Behind every stockholder is the corpora- tion that issued the stock. Within that cor- poration there are managers who are paid to "support, protect and defend" the in- terests of the owners who elected them. Collateral to their directives for making a profit, business managers have a respon- sibility for defending the sacredness of in- vestment by the owners, and collateral to that, for informing the stockholders of those attacks-creeping socialism or other- wise?which affect the profit potential. Yet Internal Revenue has declared it is a non-deductible expense for a company to spend money in its own defense. Thus, the stockholders-15,000,000 of them?are the first and only group in the country which is formally denied by a bureaucracy its constitutional right to petition Congress through the modern methods used by other groups. Legislation was before Congress in the last session to correct this inequity, and presumably it is to be reintroduced. Such legislation would seem to offer an impor- tant field for action by management to de- fend the rights of their investors. The stockholder is potentially one of the most powerful forces for retaining the American system of enterprise upon which the greatness of our Republic and its po- litical system stands. He is a slumbering giant! University Rejects Federal Aid ((ontinued from page 1) nation, if we go along with policies we consider wrong? "Weil, even so, since this money is available you are foolish if you do not get your share of it." Such oppor- tunistic motivation represents a dismal surrender of ethical principles, it seems to me. Can we stoop so low and maintain our integrity, our self-respect? It will cost us something to decline cheap and easy money. so- freely given. Our Church. our alumni, our friends who be- lieve in private enterprise and in the inde- pendence of our Church colleges will have to provide the money that we need for our survival in the years ahead. I believe that is the better way and I have enough faith and hope to take this calculated risk. Excerpt from Capital University Bulletin, December, 1961. Approved For Release 2003/11/04: Letters THANK you for your excellent work on "The Moral Basis of a Free Society." It is exceedingly difficult for some folks to comprehend that we have any such re- sponsibilities in this avenue of thought. The present trend ix dangerous, and men are being left without an anchor. As an evangelical. I am greatly disturbed. A new generation is arising that knows not .. . Rev. Frederick J. Nader Flushing, New York IN THE past I did not always thor- oughly read CHRISTIAN ECONOMICS. but I do now. We must return to common sense conservatism. Thank you for your paperRev. Gary Davis Fennimore, Wisconsin IA F . LOOK forward eagerly to each is sue of CHRISTIAN ECONOMICS. It has been a wonderful blessing in our lives and most helpful for the practical Chris- tian approach to the great issues of the Airs. O. S. Hall Columbus, Ohio EVERY minister of Jesus Christ ought to say "Amen- to your inspiring CHRIS- TIAN ECONOMICS. Count me as a prayer partner. Rev. Frank C. Woods Long Beach, California I FIND the articles in CHRISTIAN ECONOM ICS accurate, hardhitting. time- ly and needed. John R. Hallman Osceola, Missouri VOR YEARS I have received your CHRISTIAN ECONOMICS. The timely articles are not only stimulation for the mind and heart, but they afford excellent sermon material. Please accept this as my endorsement of ihe truth you so coura- geously present. Rev. Robert T. Fisher Russellville, Ohio The Honor Roll below affords space for the names of only a few of our friends who have wholeheartedly commended our efforts. HONOR ROLL Rev. Fred A. Alexander, Ashland, Ohio Ronald Andrews, Overland, Missouri Rev. Paul J. Banta, Centerville, Indir.na Dr. Kenneth Gene Barry, Greenleaf,Wisc, John M. Bean, Warminster, Bucks Co.. Pa, Rev. A. M. Bolland, White Haven, Pa. r Rev. B. M. Books, Hamlin, Kansas Mrs. John P. Butler, Midland, Texas Warren H. Colson, Proctorsville, Vermont Rev. willis E. Dunks, Defieriet, N. Y. Rev. William Darsie. McKeesport. Pa. Rev. C. Johnson Davis, Vandalia, Mo, Charles II. Donahue. West Roxbury, Mass. George N. Fisher; Fort Worth, Texas Rev. Thomas W. Fryer, Florence, S. C. Otto George Gerbich, Woodville, Ohio , Rev. A. Cabot Johnson, Gresham, Oregon Mrs. Ronald L. Jones, Racine, Wisconsin A. S. Kilburn, Cape Elizabeth, Maine Rev. Kenneth W. Knox, Portuguese Bend,. Calif. Charles W. Lane, Jr., Lynbrook, N. Y. Marion W. Lord, Narberth, Pennsylvania Rev. Donald C7. McHenry, Cirove City, Pa. Mrs. Caroline McMahon, Pana, Illinois Rev. and Mrs. Alta Mikel, Greentop, Mo. Rev. John Moreshead, Tucson. Arizona Rev. Frederick S. Porter, Columbus, Ga. Rev. Rov C. Price, Williams, Oregon A. W. Rudquist, Prosper, North Dakota Rev. C. G. Sego, Clarksville, Tennessee Rev. B. H. Smallwood, Forest, Ohio Rev. Samuel R. Stone, Covington. Virginia Rev. Cassius E. Street, Leawood, Kansas Rev. Eugene A. Watts, Bakersfield, Calif. Robert E. Weatherford, Bellmawr, N. J. Mrs. George J. Weber, Salt Lake City, Utah Ray Watson, Richton, Mississippi Mr. and Mrs. R. j. Whaley, Jackson, Montana Warren Zimmerman, Lawrence, Kansas -------------------------------------------------------------- VOL. XIV APRIL 17, 1962 No. 8 CHRISTIAN ECONOMICS HUNGER?THE HALLMARK OF COMM UNISM Lawrence Sullivan UNIVERSITY REJECTS FEDERAL AID H. L. Yochum A SLUMBERING GIANT WHAT IS AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS? EDITORIALS 4 James P. Selvage Rev.!. E. Howard Howard E. Kershner CHRISTIAN FREEDOM FOUNDATION 250 West 57th Street New York 19, N. Y. Non-Profit Organization U. S. POSTAGE PAID Permit No. 70 Garden City, N. Y. CHRISTIAN ECONOMICS CIA-RDP80601676R002800250016-0 Voice of the Editor "You Are Directed...." rr HE HEADLINE of a newspaper on my desk an- nounces, "Goldberg directs strikers to return to jobs.. The article quotes from a letter by Mr. Gold- berg, acting as Chairman of the President's Missile Site Labor Commission. He wrote to the unions: "You are directed to instruct members of your or- ganization to return to work and remain at work at the Atomic Energy Commission installation...." We have little sympathy with striking defense workers at Cape Canaveral, the missile bases or other critical de- fense work; but just the same it is a new note for the Administration to order people to work and to say to the unions, "You are directed...." These expressions underline the fact that freedom is not automatic. It must be earned. The way we earn it is to practice self-discipline?voluntarily to do right, be hon- orable, decent and fair. Society cannot exist without discipline and if it is not voluntary, we bring upon ourselves the authoritarian con- trol of government, and become slaves instead of free men. We can take our choice, self-control or secret police control. Back Road to Communism THE LATE Bill Foster was a militant Socialist and after the Communist Revolution in Russia an un- tiring worker in the Communist conspiracy to destroy capitalism and impose communism upon the world. Stalin advised him that the American people would never accept socialism or communism and that the only hope of imposing a Red regime in the United States was "a consistent but gradual increase in local and federal pub- lic ownership projects." Publicly-owned operations, he pointed out, paid little if any taxes and in the end "... re- sult in a fiqal acceptance of complete government owner- ship and operation." That, he explained, is communism. "Evpry new local or federal public ownership proj- ect," said Stalin, "is an added nail in the coffin that will finally contain capitalism. The tax burden will become greater every year for the American people, and each government-owned operation will throw an added bur- den opt the private taxpayers. It is obvious that the cam- el's back of capitalism will finally break under an un- bearable burden." Stalin told Foster "... that the average left-wing American liberal, who would be insulted at being called a Socialist or a Communist, would enthusi- astically use all of his influence to bring about more and more public ownership operations in the field of natural resources, transportation and other commercial lines. That is the way we must enlist the left-wing liberals in all walks of life, not only in the United States, but in all Latin America as well." It is clearly evident that Stalin proposed to commu- nize America by the extension of government ownership of utilities, transportation and other enterprises. Where there is opposition to outright ownership, he instructed his followers to seek the largest possible measure of regu- lation and control. Another back-door road to communism advocated b" Stalin is heavier and heavier taxation. Government now takes more than one-third of the income of the people in the form of taxes and the percentage goes higher and higher. This is another way of measuring the extent to which socialism has taken over our country. It is bitterly ironical that so many of our leaders who claim to be fighting communism are enthusiastically ad- (Continued on Page 2) APRIL 17, 1962 ? TEN CENTS HRI STIAN ECONOMICS We believe in les,, government, the free market and the faithful application of Christian principles to all economic. activities. COPYRIGHT 1962 BY THE CHRISTIAN FREEpom FouNDATION, INC., REQUESTS To REPRINT INVITED. Hunger?The Hallmark of Communism LAWRENCE SULLIVAN WORLD communism is one long breadline. China, Russia and Cuba are the three focal points of Communist intransigence today; and all are hungry in various stages of malnutrition. China is prostrated by mass famine. Russia is con- fronted by persistent malnutrition in all her big industrial centers. Hunger as the hallmark of communism was offi- cially introduced in Cuba early in March this year when Castro announced general rationing of all foods. Food books are issued only by the neighborhood chiefs or the Cuban security police. Those who have re- sisted the Castro program in any degree are denied food books. A British tourist reported in Washington. March 3: "Cuban officials are not honoring all ration cards. There is no meat, no eggs, and scarcely any milk. A friend in Havana told me this week the last egg he ate was on January 24." Sugar grinding mills are currently producing about one-fifth their normal daily capacity of finished sugar for export. After 44 years of collective farming, the Russian cupboard is bare. As Khrushchev states the prob1ein heo8ceii his tits uf missile blackmail: "We have been fighting for 40 years to achieve the present level of production. Now we have to do two or three times as much in two or three years." Of course, no nation can hope to double or treble its food production in two or. three years. Hence. the food crisis portends the early collapse of socialist agriculture in Russia and the European satellites. Individual farms, under life-tenure lease, now are discussed publicly by non-party economists throughout Russia. Khrushchev faced the problem squarely in his his- toric seven-hour harangue before the Central Committee on March 5: "If we fail to solve this task, we shall confront the country with great difficulties, and the cause of building communism will he seriously damaged." Khrushchev has now recommended new Youth Bat- talions, including women, to be shipped en masse from the cities to bring in new crop areas in the arid grasslands of middle Siberia. Never before have women been mobi- lized for such work. This gesture clearly marks a race for the panic button in Moscow. Russia farms 500-million acres of crop land, against 329-million acres for the U.S.A. But because of shortages in farm machinery and fertilizer, and the short growing season, her acre yields run only about 40 per cent of the U.S. averages. And Russia has 30-million more mouths to feed at home, before she starts her foreign aid pro- grams! A current on-the-spot survey by the World Food Or- ganization in Rome as reported through the Department of Agriculture here, concludes: "Soviet consumption is low for meat, milk, eggs, fruits, and vegetables. Also, the Soviets have less edible fats and oils." These shortages explain Khrushchev's vigorous de- mand last September for "mare horse meat." Official figures now available from Rome show that in 1961 Rus- sia consumed 500-million pounds of horse meat for hu- man food. With the Russian people on the brink of famine and Cuba issuing ration cards for what she may have to ra- tion, the third party in this Communist triumvirate of hunger is witnessing mass starvation on a scale never before known in human history. It is sweeping Com- munist China in a scourge which challenges gravely the 12-year dictatorship of Mao Tze-tung. A special research task force from the U. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture, now in Hong Kong, reports that the Chinese famine today is entering its fifth successive year. Food supplies for China's 700 million population are at "a dangerously low level" which could take "an enor- mous toll in health and ability to work." Masses of workers in the cities have not the daily strength to operate their accustomed tools and machines. Hungry mobs denude the fields of the collective farms by night, destroying many crops before maturity. All livestock is disappearing from the rural landscape. Even dogs are prized as city meat. Over vast areas. China teeters today on the brink of a second Dark Age of nomadic cannibalism. In 12 short years since Mao Tze-tung took over in Peiping, communism has come to full ideological flower in China?abysmal chaos, in a land still recording a popu- lation growth of 14 million a year. Since 1949, China's population has expanded by some 168 million, yet total food production in 1961 was smaller by many thousands of tons than the total harvest of 1949. In the words of one Chinese observer: "It is a tragedy for the Chinese people. .. . Can the Communist regime last . . . ? Each village is now a miniature Communist dictatorship presided over by zealots and fanatics often still in their teens." (Continued on Page 3) University Rejects Federal Aid H. L. YOCHUM, President. Capital tiniverAdv. Columbm, obio AFEW months ago when we were about to start construction of a new resi- dence hall for men students, estimated to cost over $400,000, we decided that we should arrange a loan of $300,000 from a local savings and loan association rather than from the federal government. Instead of a 40-year loan, this is a 20-year loan. Instead of around three per cent interest, we are paying 51/2 per cent interest. Was this right or wrong, wise or foolish? You be the judge; let us tell you why our Board of Regents took this action. At the very outset we may as well admit that most of our colleges and universities are gladly applying for federal loans on construction of buildings. Some of my col- leagues tell me that we are foolish to hold out on this issue and some rea- Approved For Release 2003/11/04: CIA-RDP80601676R002800250016-0 sons are given in educational journals why we should quit debating and gratefully ac- cept all the federal aid we can get. Frankly, most of the argument in support of accept- ing federal aid seems to be rationalization (which! would define as giving impressive reasons for what you have already decided to do for less impressive reasons!). I can- not help thinking of the alleged reply of a politician when he was asked where he stood on a certain issue "as a matter of principle:" Said he, "Wait until I have fig- ured out where the advantages are, and then tell you where I stand as a matter of principle." During November the college presidents and some of their colleagues have been visiting business and industrial firms throughout the State- to present the needs and merits of the independent college and invite support through the Ohio Founda- tion of Independent Colleges. For 10 years we have told these business and industrial leaders that we feel there is a place for the independent colleges and universities alongside the tax-supported institutions of our state and several of our cities. We have declared that we think independent col- leges and independent business firms have a common stake in preserving private ini- tiative and enterprise, that we should help one another and not run to the govern- ment to get the help we need. Now, can we have it both ways? Can we talk out of both sides of our mouths? Can we solicit gifts as voluntary support and then turn around and ask for aid from tax-derived funds? During ;the 10 years we have worked to- gether in the Ohio Foundation of Inde- pendent Colleges. we have received signifi- cant amounts; the total for Capital is nearly $300,000. We have said this was the alternative to losing our independence by taking federal aid. I want to be honest when I present our case to the public! Two rebuttals are frequently offered to our stated position. "You cannot resist the historic process?you cannot fight the cur- rent trend." Why not? If we feel that the current trend is wrong we can and we should fight it! If we are convinced the historic process is in the wrong direction, we are morally obligated to resist it! Where are our principles, where is our concern for values, where is our fidelity to the best interests of our institution or Church or (Continued on Page 4) VOL. XIV APR. 17, 1962 No. 8 CHRISTIAN ECOI\OMICS Howard E. Kershner, Editor George H. Cless. Jr., Managing Editor I. E. Howard, Assistant Editor John A. Huffman, Assistant Editor P flbliAlied fortnightly foun September through June by CHRISTIAN FREFOOM FOUNDATION, INC. A Non-Profit Organization 250 W. 57th ST., NEW YORK 19, N. Y. Articles are selected on a basis of general interest, and may not alIvays be wholly in accord with the views 11t the editors-. NaPlieS are added to the mailing list of CHRIST/AN ECONOMICS upon request and without charge, butt voluntary contributions are solicited. Voice of the Editor ,Continited) vocating all of these things which Stalin told Foster would eventually completely communize our country. We do not need to fall into this trap. Now that it has been exposed, let the American people put an end to fur- ther socialization via taxation and government ownership and control of our industrial operations. The sad fact is that government now owns and operates 700 large busi- ness corporations in our country and thousands of smaller ones. Nearly all of them operate at heavy loss. Govern- ment also owns 33.8 per cent of the land surface of our country. We need a retro-rocket to brake our descent into socialism and a new booster charge to put us back in the freedom orbit. Destructive Foreign Aid UOR YEARS we have said that lavish, ill-considered foreign aid often does more harm than good. The tragic experience in Iran affords ample proof of this view. During the past 11 years, the United States has poured more than $1,100,000,000 into Iran. During this period, I eheran has grown from b00,000 people to almost 2,000,- --TTO0. The enormous flocid of dollars Was created a wild boom which has now collapsed. Of course, we are called upon to pick up the pieces and we are now sending about $15.000.000 a month in an effort to hold the regime together. It is said that there is about $60,000,000 worth of road-building equipment in Iran and no more roads to build. About 40,000 television sets and 100,000 electric refrigerators are in warehouse, awaiting sale. Super- markets have sprung up in which refrigerators, coolers, television sets, radios, recorders and other modern equip- ment are sold on long term credit. Many expensive houses have been built by millionaires who have grown rich in land speculation based on the golden flood from the United States. Easy money, squeezed out of long-suffering and over- burdened American taxpayers is not the answer to the problems presented by the underdeveloped countries. The real answer is a little slower but far more permanent and beneficial. It consists in limited government, free enter- prise, sound money, and laws assuring fair play to do- mestic and foreign savers who are willing to invest their money in industrial development. That is how America and other Western countries won their higher standards of living and it is the only way that other countries can progress toward the same goal. The alternative is the slavery of communism which may offer a certain type of industrial development at the price of the loss of in- dividuality, self-reliance and freedom. The price is too high and the results too meager for communism or so- cialism to be considered an alternative to free enterprise based on the moral law. Another Defeat THREE and one-half years ago the United States was I well ahead of Soviet Russia in its knowledge of nu- clear science. The Kremlin devised a strategy to overcome this lead. It agreed to a moratorium on testing and en- tered into a long discussion with the Western powers on the subject of nuclear disarmament. Meanwhile. Russian scientists were perfecting their plans for making an elabo- rate and extensive series of nuclear explosions designed vastly to increase their knowledge of the subject. When all was in readiness, the Soviet Government re- nounced the moratorium and quickly completed a .series of about 50 atmospheric tests. It is believed that Russian scientists gained very important information as a result of this great variety of tests including bombs of hereto- fore unheard of strength. It now appears that the long moratorium was arranged by the Soviet Union to stop the free world from perfect- ing its knowledge of nuclear science while the Commu- nists endeavored to catch up with and to surpass the West. The talks provided the time necessary for the extensive preparation and it stopped Western progress in nuclear science. Western civilization depends upon keeping ahead of the Communist countries in this desperate race. To stop is to allow them to overtake us. When and if they do, we shall be faced with an ultimatum to surrender or eke! Nuclear warfare is horrible to contemplate, but sur- render with the blotting out of the values developed by Western-Christian civilization is even a greater catastro- phe. This false moratorium has been of great advantage to the Kremlin. Our government was duped by it just as it was duped into accepting stalemate rather than victory in Korea. We cannot stand any more such defeats. Our leaders must sharpen their wits and steel their determi- nation to defend the right of the West to survive at what- ever cost may be necessary. Moreover, we cannot con- tinue to live under a strategy of mere defense. We must move over to aggressive prosecution of the cold war until communism is destroyed. The alternative is our own de- struction. Believing as we do that Western civilization is incomparably better than communism, we must imple- ment our faith and press forward with inflexible deter- mination riot only to prevent Communist expansion but to discredit it in the minds of men throughout the world and to defeat and dethrone its gangsters who have enslaved so large a portion of the world's people. No! No! Mr. Ribicoff ED BY Secretary Ribicoff, the Administration is push- ing hard to provide medical care for elderly people under Social Security. He told a cheering audience re- cently: "One-hundred-eighty-thousand members of the American Medical Association are not going to frustrate the will of 180 million Americans." Secretary Ribicoff is wrong in claiming that 180 mil- lion Americans support his plan for socialized medicine. Large numbers of them, in my opinion an overwhelming majority, oppose it. To name two, the editor and his wife, although in the age group that would benefit, do not want any part of it. No, Secretary Ribicoff, you are not speak- ing for us nor are you speaking for tens of millions of Americans who oppose the socialism you are trying to clamp upon us. Your proposal would provide free medical care for elderly people at the expense of younger people who must bear the added tax burden. What you propose is no less Approved For Release 2003/11 than coveting and stealing sonic of the wealth of younger people for the benefit of older people. It should he the duty and privilege of older people to leave something for their children and grandchildren to make life more pleasant for them rather than to impose heavy financial burdens upon them. Where necessary, it should he the duty and the privilege of younger people to care for their parents. Your scheme would destroy these two fundamental foundation principles of civilized so- ciety. It would encourage dependence, and the shifting of the burden everyone should try to carry for himself, upon the shoulders of others. Your proposal is a further step toward the destruc- tion of self-reliance and thrift. It encourages the "give me" attitude which destroys character and tends to reduce men and women to the subservient status of beggars. I have seen enough of this system in foreign countries to know that I do not want it and I resent your attempt to represent me as wanting something which I oppose. Dismemberment BY UNANIMOUS vote the National Assembly of Panama is demanding the scrapping of treaties with the United States establishing the Panama Canal and the Canal Zone. When former President Eisenhower, near the end of his second term, acceded to Panama's request that the Panama flag he flown in the Canal Zone, I predicted that in a little while Panama would demand the Canal. In this case, as always, appeasement leads to further de- mands and finally to surrender. It won't be long till Cuba will demand that we sur- render the Guantanamo Naval Base. If the Connally Reservation is repealed, we may expect to be hauled be- fore the World Court by Russia's demand for the return of Alaska and perhaps the southwest part of our own country to Mexico. When it is remembered that no Communist nation adheres to the World Court, yet a national from each one of them is eligible to sit as '1 judge upon this Court, mak- ing it possible for a majority of the judges at any given time to be Communists, it becomes apparent that the Connally Reservation is our only safeguard against,forci- hle dismemberment by our enemy. It would deprive LIS of the right to decide these matters for ourselves and put our fate in the hands of UN and its World Court with the strong probability that Communists from Communist nations may at any time be in control and exercising the power of life and death over our country. It the American people want voluntarily to surrender any oftheir contiactual rightS, their privileges or their possessions, they are free to do so, but surely they do not want to place themselves at the mercy of their enemies by putting these vital questions into the hands of hostile Communist judges sitting on the World Court., That is exactly what they will do if they permit our government, urged on by many leaders in educational, lite.rary, politi- cal and religious circles to repeal the Connally Reserva- tion to the resolution providing for the adherence of our country to the World Court. Dizzy Spending BOUT the turn of the century when I was a small boy, I remember the sensation created by the first billion dollar Congress. For the years 1898 and 1899 the Federal government expended about one billion dollars. Sixty-two years later we are spending approximately 200 times that amount and there seems to be little concern on the part of the public. Our dollar is more than half gone now. A few years more at the present rate of deterio- ration and most of its value will have disappeared. Econ- omy and reduced spending are imperative if we would avoid the miseries of inflation, the loss of our prosperity and of our industrial leadership. A Slumbering Giant JAMES P. SELVAGE THERE IS a question whether the stock- holder, as a collective entity, is a corpo- rate hero or villain?or just a victim with an eventually marking the spot unless he learns to use the mentality which statis- tics say he has. The capitalistic system has been likened to a stool with three legs, called capital, labor and management. If that analogy is correct despite the efforts of Walter Reu- ther and socialist-minded politicians, it is the stockholder who puts the CAP in cap- italism. There are some 15 million stockholders. Yet, as these have grown to an extent where they should be a potent political force, they are instead a principal victim for socialistic experiments. 2 Taken individually, the stockholder is probably better educated, more articulate, more well-to-do, and more ambitious for the welfare and security of his family than the average of any large group in our society. If he ever started kicking up his heels he would be power unlimited. He winds up, however, as a complex, bedeviled character who is told repeatedly that the fruits of his contribution to the three-legged stool belong to others. His is the only income in our society that is double-taxed; once when the corpo- ration reports what his investment of money has earned, and again when he shares in the dividends. Labor bosses say: "Take it away from the investor and give it to our members." Socialistic Americans for Democratic Ac- tion who occupy key spots in government have defined him as a "loophole" to be closed along with their other -liberal" steps toward leaving him for dead. It is a phenomenon to see 15 million persons, most of them women who are not known for being pushed around without scratching back, being plowed under as a collective group. Politicians of the left, socialistically- inclined professors, administrators of gov- ernment and labor leaders join in a con- stant hubbub about taxing corporations more, and giving a greater share of the earnings to employees. Hijacking of corporations has become a national game. Whenever more money is needed, Congress says, "Let's soak the corporations again." Somehow we in America have been taught that it is a few thousand corporate managers who will pay the bill. Stockholders don't seem to realize that when President Kennedy demands that the steel industry not raise prices to offset wage increases and to maintain profits, it - is the investor whose heart should be bleed- ing. When Reuther blandly asks, and gets in one important instance, the right to share in profits?but not losses?the inves- tor never lifts an eyebrow or demands protection of his rights. These and similar acts have been done (Continued on Page 4) CHRISTIAN ECONOMICS /04: CIA-RDP80601676R002800250016-0 Pastors, please note that free imprints of Sermonettes are available upon request in sufficient qua, iii' for insertion in your Sunday morning Church Calendar or Bulletin. Standing orders invited. THE SERMONETTE?Armed with the Power of the Lord NEASTON, N. Y., in the year 1777, a little band of Friends, gathered to- gether in their new meetinghouse of rough- hewn logs, were surrounded by a band of Indians. Allies of Burgoyne, they had come to slay all, but changed their minds and stayed to meeting. "It would show little faith," the Quak- ers said, "to leave our homes and go with the other settlers to Albany Fort. Armed with the power of the Lord, we fear no man." They exercised their own judgment without blame to the authorities, who had urged evacuation. Robert Nesbit, a visiting Friend, had walked two days through the untamed wil- derness from East Hoosac, now Adams, Mass., to bring them comfort. He had come because he knew of the dangers that threatened the little clearing. "The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety," he told them. "He shall cover thee with His feathers. Under His wings shall thou trust." He lingered over the words. The Indians, 13 of them, in war paint and feathers, with tomahawks and gory scalps dangling from their belts, came noiselessly through the dooriess entrance. Twelve poisoned arrows were ready to fly at the signal from their chief, whose pierc- ing eyes searched every corner and nook for weapons. Finding the Friends un- armed, he signaled his warriors, and the 12 arrows were placed back in their quiv- ers, the bows stacked against the wall. The braves seated themselves on a bench and bowed their heads, but not be- fore a silent, terrible struggle had taken place between the forces of love and hate. The fierce, dark eyes of hate looked into the calm, blue eyes of love belonging to Zebulon Hoxie, patriarch of the Meeting. Finding only steady friendship in Zebu- Ion's unwavering gaze, the dark eyes fi- nally felt, and himself unarmed, the Indian chief sat down, his dusky braves ranged around him. The silent meeting continued, increasing in solemnity. The whole room was filled with the presence of a living, unseen Power. The slow moments passed. At last the hour of silent worship ended. Old Zebulon shook hands with the Eider on the facing bench beside him and then advanced and shook hands with the Indian chief. "Indians come to kill white people," the chief explained in broken English and sign language. "Find no guns, no arrows, no knives! White man worship Great Spirit. Great Spirit inside Indian, too. Great Spirit say, 'No kill 'em!'" Selecting a white feather from his arrows, he placed it over the doorway as a sign of peace between the Indians and the Quakers. It was one of the strangest Friends meetings ever held. A New York State historical marker near the road commemorates the incident: It has been many years since that brave little band of Quakers in Easton, N. Y. was surrounded by Burgoyne's Indian allies, but the spirit of those first staunch Friends who refused to leave their homes in the wilderness because it showed "little faith to be afraid" is still there, and their de- scendants keep the story of their faith and courage alive. "The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety" is just as true and comforting in this atomic age, with its dreadful threat of nuclear weapons, as it was in 1777, with its threat of poisoned arrows and toma- hawks. Ruth G. Campbell Reprinted Iron, "Friends Journal," Oct. I, 1955 [lunger The Hallmark of Communism Wm:tinned from Page 1) Our Department of Agriculture task force will sub- mit its formal documentary report through routine chan- nels. probably within three months. Meanwhile, all U. S. intelligence agencies are sifting their daily pouches for material bearing directly upon the spreading Chinese famine and its demoralizing im- pact upon the whole fabric of civilization on the Asiatic Main land. These reports come every day from Tibet, Japan, Burma, Formosa, Thailand, Malaya, Hong Kong, India, Nepal, Australia, Canada, and Indonesia. Even in remote Mongolia, 1961 already is fixed in the primitive folklore as "the hunger year." One report from Shanghai, the most important indus- trial center of all China, outlines the food crisis in these words:' "The current ration in Shanghai consists of two ounces of rice per week; two ounces of pork every ten days; four ounces of biscuit per month; four ounces of fish each week; four ounces -of sugar per month; four cookies per month; one yard of cotton cloth per year." This official ration measures out to little more than two ounces of food per day. The Western standard is about three pounds a day. Nutritional scientists in Washington have been poring over tons of these chance intelligence fragments for some ten _months. Their conclusion is that daily food intake for the masses of China has been at the malnutrition level so persistently for the last two years that the entire population now has fallen into a state of physical lassi- tude which avoids all self-sustaining effort in whatever di- rection?in the fields, shops, streets, factories, or mines. Before the Communist take-over, the average village farm was 2.5 acres, and carried 5.3 persons. After the Red land reform of 1950 the average distribution was 1.3 acres for each 5.3 people. State collections from the communes are roughly 60 per cent of the harvest. Translating these figures to a per capita return, we get a harvest of approximately 20 per cent of the pre- revolutionary average for each villager?after taxes. The rural communes uprooted traditional family life in every aspect, setting at naught the cultural patterns of a thousand years. The 60 per cent crop taxes, payable in kind, destroyed all local incentives to production. "As a result, many farmers burned their crops, flooded their farms, permitted grass and weeds. to grow, let more than the usual acreage lie fallow." Next, they killed their livestock, lest it be seized by the commune directors in retaliation for short grain de- liveries. Science has recognized for more than 20 years that mass starvation first is manifest in human passivity. Per- sistently undernourished populations have sufficient food to sustain life, but not enough to sustain normal mental and motivational activity. From day to day starving peo- ple become more and more unresponsive to their physical stage is total inactivity: the victim of slow surroundings. h e las starvation lies down quietly in the street, or in the field, to die. From Malaya comes the report of a farmer refugee from a decaying Chinese commune. When he left China, there were 55 men in his work force. Fifteen of them suffered from festering beriberi, an unfailing symptom of d the arrival of 69 refugees from advaHnocnegd KmoanIngurteriptoiornte. a model Chinese commune in Chungshan province. "The leader said they fled because of an acute shortage of food." The Mainland commune this group had abandoned CHRISTIAN ECONOMICS Approved For Release 2003/11/04: CIA-RDP80601676R002800250016-0 long had been a showplace for China's great leap forward. All overseas visitors had been guided there to see for themselves the rich abundance of the Cheungkapin Vil- lage commune. The intrepid band of 69 who risked their lives to escape this model village made up the largest group of refugees ever to reach Macao, the Portugese clearing cen- ter to freedom. This group included 34 starving children. "Starvation and forced labor are the new way of life in Lhasa under the Chinese Communists," runs a report from Tibet. "Barley and wheat grown around Lhasa were being shipped elsewhere, leaving the natives only dried beans, 'which they formerly used as fodder for animals." Red China has purchased 1,350,000 tons of grain and flour from Canada and Australia during the last year, but now has exhausted her credit. All future purchases in those areas must be for international cash, which Peiping has not. "The regime is extremely hard pressed, and the situa- tion will get worse before getting any better,- says a rep- utable private report from Hong Kong. . Hong Kong officials have been recording the testi- mony of hungry refugees for five years. One recent state- ment, in literal translation, runs: "Since the happening of the food scarcity the rural economy has become persistently depressing, and people's pauperism has constituted a vicious circle which provides an essential factor in bringing about general bankruptcy under the Communist regime.- A concurrent report from Hopei Province relates that for many people the famine has been alleviated "as a result of using weeds for food." "In consequence of the concentration policy in food production," says another literal translation, -many of the Communist cadres have sunk in the depth of vices ... which in turn have spoiled the Communist organization, and have driven the Communists themselves into self- destruction." Yet another literal translation runs: "As a consequence of the land reform, the life of the people was engulfed in a most wretched plight, which influenced greatly their working spirit, and the greater reduction of food production." Another refugee recently reported in Hong Kong: "During the last five years there has been a famine on the Mainland every year." All of these tragic details of the China famine have been suppressed by the fact that only pro-Communist reporters have been allowed beyond Hong Kong. Uni- formly, they have glossed over the mounting food crisis with such euphemisms as "drought," "flood," and "nat- ural disasters." The UN WFO, in Rome, has been trying for a year to get a study commission into China, to be selected by the International Red Cross. Peiping will have none of it. Our own Agricultural Task Force could get no further than Hong Kong. It is still there. A recent Japanese trade mission to Peiping was told frankly that the commune system had proved a total fail- ure. But, at best, one more crop will he lost in the transi- tion to the new system, whatever it is to be. The Chinese food disaster bears directly on the whole structure of world communism, for China had pledged 300 million bushels of grains to Russia in 1961, and de- faulted on every ton of it. Our own food experts are not permitted to announce their conclusions because China has published no food production goals since 1959: therefore, there are no official statistics to be refuted. The pro-Communist press of the entire world is happy to ignore the China famine, because it is the total undoing of world Marxism. During February 1962, both Tokyo and Taipei of- fered Peiping 100,000 tons each of emergency rice con- tributions, but Mao did not respond to these offers. Tokyo then announced she would seek direct com- mercial agreements inside China for her gift tonnage. Formosa announced she would try to assist China with gift packages of rice to be delivered by air-drop. "Refugees reaching Hong Kong have reported wide, spread discontent on the Mainland as a result of hunger, spreading even to the Communist militia," this February report concluded. Late in November 1961, a Shanghai refugee dis- closed that "if you want to buy a pair of socks in Com- munist China, you must turn in an old pair in exchange with your money and your ration card." If there are no new socks in stock, the buyer is given a commodity receipt for his old socks, to be redeemed in a month or two, when the next shipment of socks arrives. The same applies "to light bulbs, cooking utensils, underwear, and -mosquito netting." "Most consumer goods factories have suspended or curtailed production due to raw material shortages." The most pressing raw material shortage, of course, is in foodstuffs. The factory workers simply have not suf- ficient energy to get to work. Taken all together, these reports outline the total col- lapse of civilization on Mainland China. As famine produces human passivity, the machinery of civilization stops--production, transport, communica- tion, distribution. Mao Tze-tung now is king of all he surveys?a tragic anthill of 700 million starving Chinese, to whom commu- nism has proved itself, in 12 short years, to be what honest history has always described it?Author of Chaos. The Twilight of Morality IT IS common knowledge that when a government at- tempts to coerce the people by an expansion of the police power, there is an inherent weakness in the moral and ethical fiber of that nation. When the internal co- hesive obligations of a people no longer sustain a society, the state by coercion attempts to contain the population. In this sense the expansion of the police power is the overt evidence of the breakdown of social solidarity in that nation. A government or a society is sustained by one of two kinds of control: ethical compulsion, or by force of the club and the gun. If morality weakens within a nation, the government expands into a police state. When a na- tion is held together by the club and the gun, morality is already dead. Dictatorships feed upon decadent moral- ity. The tyrant's club cannot create political or social morality. When a government becomes a police state and rules by the club and the gun, it thereby signs its own death warrant. There is a recoil in the use of the club as there is in the powder exploded in the breech of a rifle. Morality once shattered destroys the people and the ruler. Outside of prison and this side of hell men are not bound together by the club but by the consciousness of moral obliga- tions. The bond which holds men together is morality and not brutality. When a nation builds walls to contain the people, morality fades and in time that nation dies behind its own barricades. Walter A. Lundell, Professor of Sociology, Iowa State University Reprinted from The Freeman, March, 1962 3 Approved For Release 2003111104: CIA-R0P80B01676R002800250016-0 TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE TO:. ? 11) \ BUILDING ROOM NO: REMARKS: FROM: ROOM NO. BUILDING EXTENSION FOR*N? .24 1 REPLACES FORM 36-8 I FEB 55 WHICH MAY BE USED. (47) Approved For Release 2003/11/04 : CIA-R0P80B01676R002800250016-0 Approved For Release 2003/11/04: CIA-RDP80601676R002800250016-0 MEMORANDUM FOR: Da F.Y.I. Larry Sullivan has a very interesting "famine" story that may interest you. S' It(11\ 'IBTANLEY J. GROAN h), i )1 (0^ 6/S. i6V *Assistant to the Director c? 9 May 1962 (DATE) FORM NO. 10 I REPLACES FORM 10-101 1 AUG 54 WHICH MAY BE USED. (47) Approved For Release 2003/11/04: CIA-RDP80601676R002800250016-0 Approved For Release-2001411/04 : CIA-RDP80601676R002800250016-0 ? APR 1967 Honorable Richard B..2421.f.li United States Senate Washington 25. D. C. Ds henater Russell: r-a--7.174.17_ believe that the briefing on 12 April by Agency reprosestatives of the CIA St' sbcommakems. of /be benats rased Services Caseating' and the %oats Appropriations Committee served a most useful purpose. As you know, it is msy desire to keep Lb. CIA Subcommittees of the Centress informed of Agency activities as well as to provide them with the smacooliury intelligence backgrosad to assist them in the diecharge el their legislative responsibilities. My hops is tamest with these Sub- committees at least moothly and snore often if yeti or ether members find it desirable. Particularly I want to express my appreciation for the nocassary arraarknutats made by you an short notice to call the Subcommittee meeting. Tour interest Ira the work of the Agency and year support and guidance are most gratifying to me personally. Aocerely. .(Signed), JOHN Ay McCONE Distribution: 0 & 1 - Addressee John A. McCain. 1 - DCI Director 1 - DDC1 - 0/ DC! ER 1 - Leg. Counsel OGG/LC:tyska (13 Apr) Approved For Release 2003/11/0 : CIA-RDP80 0028002500163p Approved For Release 2003/11/04 : CIA-RDP80601676R002800250016-0 MEMORANDUM FOR: THE britECTOR Attached is a proposed letter to Senator Russell referring to the briefing on 12 April. Basically I am suggesting this letter to thank Senator Russell for setting up the meeting on short notice particularly since he actually cancelled another scheduled Committee meeting to make room for the Agency's appearance. Recommend signature. ? lative Counsel 16 Apr 62 (DATE) FORM NO. 101 REPLACES FORM 10-101 1 AUG 54 WHICH MAY BE USED. ( 47) Approved For Release 2003/11/04 : CIA-RDP80601676R002800250016-0