INFORMATION DISCUSSED WITH CANDIDATE INVOLVED WITH OVER-FLIGHT OF SOVIET BLOC COUNTRIES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01676R002200020004-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 30, 2002
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 19, 1956
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01676R002200020004-4.pdf147.21 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 20 ILLEGIB 6IB tt EGIB Approved For Release 2003/02/27 : CIA-RDP80B01676R002200020004-4 =t.,'r,flzTI-FIN FOR 'r . i';.' j;cc ar? 1. The candidate was questioned as to his acceptance and understanding of. ate. conditions outlined in the first interview. An affirmative answer was given. 6 2. The need for security and restriction of all information given at .away!` time relative to this project was reiterated. 3.' A hypothetical mission was described involving deep penetrati n over-r o flight of Soviet Bloc countries in single engine equipment superior to any With which the candidate is now fa .'liar. The purpose behind such a mission was described as the collection of inteliigenco, possibly slectronically, his not now available to th Wt Pi eesernower countres. A discussion of capture or non-return from mission ensued with the.understanding that the candidate would at a later ate be more able to evaluate far h3elt the k i s r . italyed. .It was stated that all persons concerned in this activity, including Ai e r Force p rsonnel to whom the propositi hdi nall bed ,ona. orgyen mae had felt that ` the . risks involved were of reasonable proportion. The candidate was cured ;that he w.ie not being required to accept or sign a contract at this w but ould have at least two or three more vTsGks in which to consider our proposition. , 4.. The term of the contract were outlined i.e. General ')ut statt:e , , y pay at 9'775 per ta)onth, ape ,~-tic~:,_1 ?s:ty status it '1540 per month, with a bonus 01 . 1Ca0O per mont', cc ruir:,u ::fi.e; arrivcl at the operational site. The ,ant of the bonus eitx,ea? in total er in p-"i?t ,eould be left largely to th' jurisdiction of the senior member. of the avers?F 9 unit. It was :further ex- - plained that this individual wcuLld' ve of a typo similar to the CO's with whom the candidate h :-%d h ,.d con -La c - . Tho tern-s oil the insurance coverage and leave .arrangements were e)lained. With an affirmatip reaction from the ctaiididate the problem of , developing an e.lana.tion for his employment during the period of the contract w:p briefly explored sold it is the. intention of the parties concerned that r4zdrewnta .' The candidate was advised that through he mild bee o notifiedf the date, time, and place for physic ti - or- and, that official to. It was outlined tb the candidate that" etepe dssigned to examine his background and :psr#oruU. reputation .gill have to be undertaken and the casid!d-;te agreed that this irus f.cce?t ogle to him. 0001 nt No. tea i h nge In Class. ^ Dc ssitied Ciis`s thangee to: TS C Next Review Date: - -- -----__--- -- 25*1 Fti3 70-3 'lace: -_r'' WHET Approved For ReleasUMBI2/BQ.: 4IA-RDP80B01676R002200020004-4 7 2 o/