POSSIBLE WORLD CONSEQUENCES OF MILTIARY ACTION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
55
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 18, 2004
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 1, 1963
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007-5.pdf3.42 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007-5 POSSIBLE WORLD CONSEQUENCES OF MILITARY ACTION The consequences of military action may be considered under two headings: First, the effect on our alliances; and second, possible Sino?Soviet responses at various vulnerable points around the world. 1. Effect on Alliances The effect of military action on our Alliances would depend to a.considerable extant upon accompanying diplomatic moves, both prior and subsequent. The key elements would be the degree of consultation with our allies; the nature of the notice given to our allies; the opportunity given to both Castro and Khhrushchev to.take present military attack by making adequate concessions; and, finally, the nature of any measures taken simultaneously with military action or immediately thereafter to bring about consultation with the Soviet Union. Also relevant would be the character and severity of the military action itself. If little or no opportunity were provided for consulta- tion with our allies -- or alternatively if they were given only brief advance notice of our action -- the chances of damage to our alliances would be greatly enhanced. Moreover, if we were to act not only without consulting our allies but also without providing either the Cubans or Russians with an Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007-5 opportunity Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 opportunity to avoid attack, we might put ourselves in the eyes of the world in a position similar to that of Britain and France at the time of Suez -- with irrevocable harm. both to NATO and the OAS. A. Effect on NATO Unless adequate political preparations were made prior to military action we could not expect to receive sympathy or support from any of the major NATO powers. If the Soviet Union were to respond vigorously ..- for example, by moving against Berlin ..`.. the United States might be held responsible in European eyes for having endangered its allies in a reckless manner. European nations are clearly not sympathetic with the United States position regarding Cuba. They regard our reaction to the recent Soviet buildup as hysteria; many have argued that our national preoccupation with Cuba proves that are not fully responsible and should not have such a large influence in deciding the fate of the Free World. Since the Europeans live with 400 la's pointed at them every day, they cannot be persuaded that the location of a few batteries of MRBM's in Cuba is a serious military threat to the United States. For us to respond to that threat by unilateral military action Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 would seem Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 would seem to them, therefore, out of all proportion to the provocation and a reckless act endangering the peace of the Id. We might expect Rhrushchev to seek to capitalize on this European reaction. He would try to increase the division and disarray of the West. To an extent, of course, the European reaction would depend on the speed and decisiveness of the military action as well as an its character, i.e., whether limited or general. It would also depend to some extent upon the steps we might take to follow up that action that is, whether or not we would seek immediate discussion with the Soviet Union. B. The 29 The shock of United States action against Cuba. might well result in the Camist takeover of several Latin American Governments. (Develop). 2. Possible Sino?Soviet Res e,sees A. Berlin If we were to take military action against Cuba, Khrushchev might well respond with direct military action against Berlin. His temptation to do so would be affected by Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 two circumstances. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 two circumstances. First, the extent of the apparent disarray in the NATO Alliance; and second, the degree to which had committed United States forces to Cuba. If the effect of our action were to produce a considerable appearance of division within NATO, Khrushchev might well believe that he could safely move against Berlin -- particularly if he joined this action with some diplomatic gestures toward West Germany and possibly Britain and France. If we should have ol- as it is estimated we might have in the event of an invasion of Cuba -- 90 to 150 thousand men immobilized, Khrushchev could well feel that he could move against Berlin without danger of effective American military resistance. . Turkey Khrushchev could argue, in a manner that might persuade a substantial part of world opinion, that if the United States found it intolerable to have MRBM's near its borders in Cuba, he could not accept to have MRBM's on Soviet borders in Turkey. He might, therefore, attempt a quick strike at Turkey. C. Iran Khrushchev might also attempt to justify some aggressive actipr$Re040$rFD~O Ii61~~APld? US installations Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 installations on the borders of the Soviet Union. Iran would be a much smaller bite since it is not a NATO member and does not itself possess a military capability comparable to that of Turkey. D. North Korea (Develop) E. Quasi and Matsu With or without goading from Khrushchev, the CHICOMS might well regard an American action against Cuba as providing the excuse for a movement against Quemoy and Matsu -- or possibly even against Formosa. . Other Possibilities One cannot rule out the possibility of Soviet action against Pakistan or a Soviet wove against Finland and even Norway. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 r srxut to Ct puuicv s unir eemi . They not 1i of tori renuociat. by him of oie 33vists a iVa des . yea tr r1ca in return rcr= vt to (JA S. inchaton A FP and 1. W. Var pure miatence pact with C consider such a deal, the t d up ea A trial Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 doftlol. nt ,d~U a tai p o t of ntc1ity, m ar, pr c tical at WID not add into sra o]; expected to be T c willing. --O a a. aeati :U= t:- A- f, -1 % l' h aeti n?t kht 67 rexi, a ,d urge wor start and. op a ve ii_ me of ,Ali: ,'rw-' atr ever uwa. 31fiyt co fete isolation in th6 pants nary VW. by t n a.?-ra n t +c : ntri?ra in this regard? the ; i ry tar ed on key pri i t:1 , but er.-k pa si 4Abama -less 41t,_04 Cavaui.x de mrive d by t s%.:1. ry actions and More X.i .ica; , action. be :vav is in Cub, Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 t cI 1 it i.TI t iOn a ? WM' S in s,,' we wot bo, u ti .ine -t ion, tt a Uy tae ttYe behavior of 1 '-a in pmhinr fJfxw nothLlg of t$: I o rxi o1n: y tihrea froi b uW an uole resooi , ca : vw bt: regard, .? s and d# t" Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 JLITARY AC iOI 1. ;end :]enior srry< ~~; us 'ioaa1 emissary to Castro. !.This could be done by 1'ar Ai eriiian ?1i j it from Miami with Prior noti Pica .iota through rims Embassy here. Ern L sar y wouici t ii ke3 -.dear to o! or willingness and aosil i.ty, respite any Iovia- a threats, to dest basea$ point out to Ca?;tro ,hF =ushchev in playin him for a sucker by using Cuba as a pawn in the Berlin situation:j ma >e clear to 11,, itra only non-negotiable poi.nte with him axe presence of ";oy _et offensive bases directed and Unitc d Mates, and his sport of revolution elsewt ere (teerica 3 Castro 1 hours or other suitable ;period in'tihich tb attnokmoe seen begin 1 a u:.dation of Soviet missile bases, to be accomplished under closes It. 6. air au'v'eillance1 accept OAS 'cant for observation inco ins cargoea assure 'urt or of cnaiv ow-sons are not brought into Cuba. 2. 3imultarteously tran trr.t rwssa. e from the Preeiden v generally in ormi*ii him of poach being made to Ca-strop pointing Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TOP 3 MT - 3.01SX I out direct violation these bee assurances, and asking for x z r t v? $ "cooperation" with Castro. (It will be important that this sessage leave KhrusdioheV "a tray outs. The two foregoing actions are essential to demonstrate to A riCar pecplt, ai to the world that nay. is effort has been pie to liquidate problem without hDstilit -ies at1 to, base if hostiliti?e nevert1helese ens these advantages override. ihabever military disadvantages these steps Shortly after (perhaps rot sore t taking foregoing e?tepv Preeident should issue a public atataient which would include t e followtriJ: ele eats t a. Facts on bases, aq}basizirig nature of threat V-) all of Caribbean ?ai b. Preaauticniar' military steps that have been taken to neutralize threat. (This ahould L ly but of specifically ets=t e that nuclear apomva are deployed for i dts use against bases if necessity er-Imes. ) c. Fact of emissary to Castro and message possible political It is believed irk stance of 1 s personal ho,zrs) d. Regret at `sot rd to which MASIC* rash Castro action, ?4. Immediately prior ople exposed a. Unilaterally Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 T+UP ? 5-2ZITI a. Uni.3.atera.l r inform key TO countries (Geraany, -U.K., France) and key Latin arrtean countries (14oxico, , ColotLbia, krazi) of action taken support. A Special effort si oold be made to have V Colo bia, and Central A ican countries istue appeals for effective action keyed to threat bases represent to them. 'b. Inform N*C of action taken. c. Seek aplpro wia e action in O.A.S. 5. i diately n der?takQ eva vatit)n of d ndonts tuaz'itaanai io 6. Q .etly put all U. 3. forces on appropriate alert status k similar action orders for Reserve. ISM-MBITM Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TOP CST .. SENSITIVE POSSIBLE COU TIOE This aeoranch= is an attempt to set down the full spectr of possible actions ?-w beginning with pure political moves having no military aspects and pro cessing, in an ascending order of ante1eit:y of izilitary commitment, to action involving an invasion of Cuba. Obviously there are =any variants possible, ane, can elments may be differently nixed to produce different results. Pure Poi.i ti: pl Action There are sral kinds of political action that might be taken ..? counterploys In other parts of the world desied to harms or threaten the bloc, an increase of the hemispheric:- pressure against Castro, the argsnis*tion of economic pressure by the NATO conentries, or even efforts to buy off Castro. It is highly doubtful that these actions, taken either individually or collectively, would by theaselv*a produce t1%* desired result. A. Ppjsible Countearpio s The Soviet Union has long been obsessed with the fear that. Germany might acquire nuclear capabi :L i ty. Aisady nta s a. We are in no position to impleemeent this threat inside of a year or more. b. The Soviet Union would be more lilc.ely to respond by aggressive action against $erlin then by relinquishing its arrangements with Cuba. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TOP S RBT IttpuW i Aw. Giving hmi present, a serious a. he most px-:>bably imediate effect world be i areas pressure b CHICC 4S for increased nuclear caP&Qity of the ,.r ow,.t -- a dsvalo ulent that co :d be of real concern to the West. b. an act. as A-mrican suppor invasion. The Iranian frontier has always been senstit -ve from the pout o : view of Russian policy. I3 dente: a. It would it creease t . cap ac : ty. cox ider this as an act o MMpon$ ` i.,.I I ty. Our bU allies would be tacit b acir ail response might well be a eve against Iran which we would be it no position to counter. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 SEWTTIVE 'r .d+ * that this would cause to yield his o M capability. Be rrul: we could not fire our w" pons without Mr of stash a general iu:ls 2. The principle utility of this action would be as a prel.iaatsar:; big e? if such action were possible it ld hardily be achieved by a ise us vote. ice? h4sispberic pity would be strained. reov+ r, having action the United States would alMOst tech to follow it by a military of Cuba from son-Bloc trade ficultg and cost of Soviet anony sad perhaps decrease Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TOP SFXJW :TI expeot the Pius support of Even iiitb the r avid *=* of a Soviet aggressive intention in Cuba we could the OM or *T+ countries in en f: Or. t r-- ?ything approaching a complete costs imposed an the y a substantially iti complete embargo would pr*bably not prevent it from continuing its Cuban build-up. a slight but real of fec t on opinion. Cubas it self, would not be sear of a e ct.d, by the breaking of dipl oatic relations. 5. This effect aa man public opinion of the escab is t of a Savo-t- - t in exile uaitt~ with Usited S tat" backin might servo to encourage dissidence within Cuba, particularly if we coupled the ostablisbeen, of such a v.rmont with a threat to help it g~M+ee1tOO7T9-- Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007-5 TOP SECRET otaid have great difficulty setting up a reasonably representative pro- Visional b . T Cuban. refugees would be used as trading pawns to bring about: actions by Castro that might be useful or ou.r purposes but not for theirs. We would compromise our Guars tang Met viv Castro. By separating ! str from complete dependence on Soviet support we aught neutralir* him as an eesivt Force is the Western Hemisphere. Dis4dye ut a :e s 1. There is real doubt that Castro could survive i. he repudiated any of his bas relations with the Bloc, particularly s incee he is surrounded by hardeore Covauni sts s 21 The Ameri - public is in no wood to crept a deal with Castro and Con ress o ou.d be unprepared to provide the wssns to Mike that deal of fect.ive, such as the restoration of the sugar qua, a program (3f foreign assistance, the hcbev. In view of the great increase of t ions n 5, >CID67~?1-girepact Approved Fo 241(% conxyersatioc: setwem the President and lrushc Might help -avert a major conflict. ration of the eeabargc , etc. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TOP SBCM w ITII Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 11 ve threat is L . t o O A S Foreign asters comm ,tober 6, iaa1ud cube. ftecoutimaxy military stems that have aeutraltze threat. (This ld I specifically I iaaerdiat* use against Fact of iaatit stie* of that arse provided .sera offensive action but, if attic vauld be taken to protee B. Approved For Releas CIA- 6R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 trias (terry, can coatries Brasil) of action I s should be so Central IlieI appeals for *f represent to tbm MAC a 3. Beek appropr issue prompt public 1=64"taly undertake, evacuation of from Gusntan . US forces 10 AUUA Allied rem ctios would be nixed and would depend upon our aaceampanying diplaeaeic moves. on the ha asny would privately Welcome a l r incisive action United States while being relieved that the acti did net further. On the otle r band, t * re old be stronS public recriminations on our lack of consultation and sow allies might seek to divest dwas*Ives of responsibility for ensu c es. Howwwor,, the nature of this would be tapered by the niter of the a we made on Cuba and the Soviet Union. D. aibaa Wmi IWac and Yj, counter-r+ tio* could include attacks an our r*ccsaissaoce aircraft both by fighter aircraft and SAMS and/or an attack an thumbs awo or an aircraft entering and #_r support. A speeal effort vs Venezuela, Col a, and threat bases Approved For ReleasgZQO4j$,;.CIA- QQ ' 6R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 leaving au . This, "fire the first shot". Cu the a difficult for ,Cuba and the Soviets to permit such rant lss- thaingea. prestige factors, such a nstratl e: part of the Castro raeg would severely strain its 4 to maintain its intezvol control. It such attar r o naais .e aircraft took place there tad? of ruse, casualties and the public reaction would m it t for t e it ed Stash to keep Its responses within precisely defined ilitary limits. of such flights our cessation of III +edby a is that would seaek is forestall Cuba against the United States or the Soviet Union from -- directly. Such a move could be ;s public call on fa a bilateral summit oonfera t?.. From a poll ticaa view, such an action would d as tra to incisive ss ,t of the United States? tbus raeinforcii r elites a W the trio t Union -- t rtiavl*rly with respect to .Alt responses might include ava Pr s t (desk d to bring p the iaaestallatisaa), and the ,gip seas to ;Js pan, etc. The Soviet Union mess to ixe teat . Such be aoqp"i ad Approved For Releas 4 -Cri'~C='6S 6R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 the suss of t for firings de hoot of actions, at heart ca an targets cam* to be a hi& We e$, the Other An action M is aaat m err $ t s bad 11 as d w r.adiaaaa al of thit be successful prey xt the a lsc*msnt of ad in Cuba or +e rout. Soviet reach s would to which the action was presentud an ion and to what degg" it s kept a Castro. The riot ies, havi dad or intended to establish. bases itself from the matter if it so cbmw is A refer tam Of udea ac.ti aiea in lia, awossive action Pokistan based on, ie talla s IV Approved For Releas Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Blockade A. YEAaxis O t Y~^ 11 I~ Y1 Y ~ A possible strike vould be the is t t uti blockade. A limited blaackade tica!n of ve military materials o national lane -- ace ptad an States -- blockades of arty k except under conditions of & ly doubtful Vhe and Rio Treaty a major politictl lital that Soviet reaction,, bietween bloclaaa or taking direct t of fo=e bloc vessels. B- $ _ ie R-OUSIAM2 d seek to escort their vessels so enf situation ships or their pars could only American fore, blockade waald eventually result in a would be. required einst Soviet war- this cou C. MOM _ a tic 1. each a blockade. It could be pr,sa ad that It is of the ly directed against diet It is certain that the Soviets would not as uL4 tiva to a single limited air 1 or limited navel be conceived of as inspect- ty supported by the Vaited apons or possibly for Ib r principles of inter- ad or afoed sviant, an obvious c enters ove a i blockade against ther with a a condition Cuban reactions could i lucze an attack against Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007i Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Or SICM - O 12 -- A. Politically, there is little difference, in terms either of all.i.ed' o r possible Soviet reactions whether the attack is at the top or the bottom of the range. If this action should be taken without prior consultation with our allies and an opportunity for both Castro and Khruslehav to avoid attack by making reasonable con easicua, the effects on our al .iancos, particularly NATO, could approach the catastrophic. If the Soviet Union were to respond vigorously .... for example, by moving against Berlin -- the United States would* in the eyes of s" t Ett mums , be hold responsible for having endangered its allies in a reckless steer, and many would probably be relieved at the opportunity for disengaging themselves from the embarrassment of Berlin. A=ep"n nations are clearly not sympathetic with the United States position regarding Cuba. They regard our reaction to the recent Soviet buildup as hysteria many have argued that our national preoccupation with Cuba proves that we are not fully responsible and should not have such a large influence in deciding the fat* of the Prot World. Since the Europeans live with 400 )VJV's pointed at them every day, they cannot be persuaded that the location of a far batteries of MKWs in Cuba is a series military threat the United States. For us to respond to that threat by unilateral military action would seem to tom, therefore, out of all proportion to the provocation and a reckless act endangering the peace of the world. C. We nigh expect russhciiev to a this European reaction. He would try to and disarray of the West. capitalize on the division Approved For Relea so? e9 76R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TOP SECRL'' r :$1ASiTIVE ~..rwr wr.rr 1. D. On the other hand, prier: consultation is at unlikely to pie any consensus and raos of our allies would seek to bring to bear the strongest possible pressure to deter us from the action. Prior approaches to Castro and to the diet won would also open to the Soviet won the possibility of making such strong threats of nuclear retaliation against the United States as to make it difficult for the Soviet o fail to implement the threats if ed we subsequently ch action against Cueba. Lt would also give Cuba and the Soviet Union sufficient strategic Warning to enable thus to ready the l M' s in Cuba for prompt firing aga ins t US targets with or without action from the Soviet Union against the United States. V1 FULL-SCALE (2,000 sorties sage) AIR A' SUESKiENT lNYASICIR WITH OR WIT A. Such action is subject, in an incr+e sed s u all of the political disabilities and dilemmas of prior conO sultation end notification set forth in V aberve. S. t ban reactions would probably include, subject to their capabilities, an attack on G uantaww o and the possibility of an att t to use *4's against American targets. It is difficult to foresee Cuban domatic. read and ugh can depend an the political context of the attacks. A h i& rate of civilian casualties would, of.' caw", produce strong senti nt. National foolings would be highly aroused. The attitude of the "July 25 Group"' would in part be determined b: estinats as to the reprisals it might expect from the from the United States if it lost ctrol. it that an air strike in itself ht produce such a condition of disorder within Yon as to require US ground intervention, whether or not : desire to undertake such intervention. C. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TO a T.S I Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TOP Sit .. SENSITIVE Soviet rea.ctilt . H any lines of r the Soviet Union.. These I Berlin which Khrushcher undertake, particularly f ion would be oper, to take-over of West cell believe he could safely aed the action with some di plc atie gestures t *wards Western Germany and possibly Britain and France, Other saible actions include a quick Soviet strike against thFt, Jupi ttra it. Turkey, action against Iran on the grounds tha,s: it rise contains US installations on the bo c der of the Sovw et Ur_ien, renewal of the action in Lees , ate With or without Sov i e t concurrence the Chinese Cos mist3 might well so . to tae tevantsge of what t:hiEy could regard as an epportuxni ty, for a mov nt against Quemoy Matsu. Approved For Relea . , CtAA_-_1-_._____ 6R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 P AASW - RAMILVE the wax ete ge aft". Pre hly th e a matter of 01=1 B. #ibmwm ...2 brie plan C. I. Mum - . ft ft"m fte teas of the ms~ wmId be not* sorrow than z t would. The P?t+leatd sut wwAlc ee a t m%e to ehthtv praeeuted in aec s1 1tu aetely with the mill t edid ..'s shock at ihle Approved For Releas O CJ/ 1676 R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 (b) p assured iot eGuld put w o c ba; (c) ri lt4Cly t 0, sired Offens: he would take appropriate (4) recite that U mw President was, takift the specific so far itiftsd and that similar action sue, be taken a st any additional ilia' installations as son as they were discovered; and (a) W ~ mum 1e r .ted States mod, as a matter of sslf defems e, fly law- vtl recv afssa a sissions over tuba:, Ci The mess t the U . of the attack, (a act for the del and those of the Latin and (C) Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 w sir - Muive tl Statat; wises. i+ -tit ?*d, offt*w The toold i t would at the tLi of (a) that limit take is in deter a it d? Stat a au4 the ether American Status; k also sae desi d as to result ae j eorw4y of eaesa li .asuru that the Las beeaw* aPOMtii; (t ps uti ram tartly cad that t prior a assuraas placed arcs pass i L* cause of the iaae t dang Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 of this Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 ire sa is treaty liga states, it u1 fly close surv:iII*i c sissi .s t Bloc Once t tuation night rapidly do t+ rior .te. L. of tti! v espo*s t iag fix 3tat would fool compelled i (b) uw*lng clears bow*-#, atota basis i t&Le Similar action again to disc =v for dof t of t W4 pL for a military po of view is Wit, in pr ridia , W x t elimination merely of the, knows MW installatic , it lases off ivo capabilities. Thus,-, r1wr* is Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Relea Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/t07/,08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Top sf-T MOCIUOU MNWMr11wIM+f ed naval IxIoelcadii d : &astra and a mint art action o the G Z a ml tbx R&4 U4 i 2. f ~a ce m j iLo, Yen i e counts ie Meatsadora, a terq O.AS ac elset d Ucn o (loot 3? s r us1y ir,Joru jy V) counter u. A. and .;taly) 0 fa lxowir: ;f or 4. ion into Cuba u_f e!f n dve weepo". Suth a bIOCIM& O&As h a C c ^atioxi > ' :d* vithin the tioT :i lam awl po1tt, .vaUy ;h a fcrT' . dec arzd ion of bia, Ike ii clm r Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 WMWMwMY.MgMe-+ie:f ~yllMyt s ' fi x ii:&Qf rx:tu, wt F R in Cuba and GwWo"Imml 6. TOP ~narr...rwn..r it Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 #icL,n k: d i# V~rect 'IactMl i141:6i ia' ,. k n cm-, uad g a I' t "=-g. to Co < y . . .2. I: d Lai 1y -c'] bLociw+ o. r.` Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 WitA Ubt1 s ic.p-wotad to rid nt tie ; t1rg Uw Cub=- -aa- W1 .--Ue t r tom.; 3r ? u; "f # i ' t t, 1 i ' x a s P e-- ~. ~, ~' th to l r & w '- 9 *-11 4~wCi.tt.:-syy9~#~ R3.Side I.t is i.. -. 'o v t il"k risowf is 1,z: 44-hat t K3 i. ^1o+y..1-nd by thr, "t!: , JALan ,t< 1* t r to 4U-m- blo -e Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 VI 'ti .3it - Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007-5 TOP SECRET - SENSITIVE ATTACK 3 - INVASION 1. It is assumed that an attack of the magnitude of Plan 3 will almost inevitably escalate into an invasion of Cuba through either attacks by air or sea on US territory, attacks on Guantanamo, or internal uprisings of the Cuban people to which we would be compelled to respond. 2. There might be some advantages in minimizing negative reactions by both Soviets and free world by initiating only an attack on offensive capabilities in Cuba and letting escalation take place in response to Cuban initiatives. , `fie should make our military plans on the assumption that we would have to continue the air assault into the pre- invasion softening-up phase and at the appropriate time land in force. 3. The effectiveness of Plan 3 in achieving its military objective of knocking out offensive capabilities in Cuba would be seriously diminished without strategic surprise. Opportunities would be given to disperse and camouflage targets and alert air defense forces. Therefore, there is a strong argument against either Congressional actions, TOP SECRET Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80B 11676R001700130007-5 -2- private exchanges with Soviets or Castro, or consultations with our major allies. 3(a). There are also possible political advantages in surprise. A sudden attack, over in a day, would become so quickly a fait accompli, that foreign ministers would have no time to develop attacks on the action but would be busy with its aftermath., On the other hand failure to give notice is subject to the charge of sneak attack or rerse Pearl Harbor, which is not considered really cricket in some quarters. 4. If the initial decision is for invasion, this is no longer a problem as invasion preparations would deprive us of strategic surprise in any case. In addition the intensive and continued air attacks incident to invasion should make possible the destruction of most priority removal targets. The xannmm* of the Castro Government would deprive any remaining/of their threat. 5. It should be noted that iftnvasion does not take place Plan 3 cannot be assumed to be a one-time affair. As new targets are discovered or arrive in Cuba, prompt new strikes will become necessary to eliminate their threat to the US and f$~ e r J4A9 /0 ? I BQe a 300Q7t5 may be difficult to adiust their timing t the crrnt Approved For Release 20 10j/08 : -R4&$OBO x1700130007-5 international situation. we will still have given the Soviets the power to force us into military action in Cuba at times of their choosing. 6. Plan 3, itself, involves no sure threat to the Castro regime. it therefore involves some risk of our having undertaken a warlike act which will displease many people in the free world without unseating Castro' s regime and thus pleasing all the others, particularly our best friends in. Latin America. 7. At the _ same time it would be difficult for the Soviets to resist pressures to retaliate, preferably in kind as in Turkey. would have killed Soviets in Cuba certainly, in addition to many Cubans, and an attack an Turkish bases is almost sure to involve killing Americans. it would then be very difficult to s avoid an escalation into general nuclear war as feelings would be high among both peoples. A retaliation by major moves in Berlin would be equally difficult for the west to accept. . if NATO were forced to choose between defeat in Berlin or disgrace in Turkey, on the one hand, or nuclear war on the other, because of 204Aa, against Cuban facilities which p~envt~~e~a8iit~eQ7/ti~tR1700~`0 might Approved For Release 200-41Q7/08 : CIA- 80601676 1700130007-5 -4- sort the Europeans have long lived with, the alliance would be put under serious strain indeed. 9. Similar issues might be raised for the US if instead of Soviet retaliation in Europe, our bombing was not wholly effective, some of the M's were operational, (much lees likely that MIG's would have nuclear bombs) and in the heat of combat Soviet crews with poort connections to Moscow, perhaps believing the attack on them was only part of a general first strike by the US on the Soviet Union, should launch nuclear missiles on the US. It would be exceedingly difficult to prevent US retaliation on the Soviet Union. Their ability to do this might be enhanced if they had several days warning of a possible attack. 10. It is difficult to be persuaded that these difficult dilemmas are worth creating unless the military pumaxis posture of the US vis-avis the Soviet Union were to be seriously impaired in the absence of this action. But from the standpoint of relative nuclear balance it is most difficult to make this argument. The basic justification xtaec#c-xe must then be the need for the US to act to support the creditq*O d Qjr Ik aW OFf;. D08*Bd' 67tk01AG*3007 e Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 of its psi s. If et r metime eo%Ad LI t* sue' aIliss Will at. ks *Lth nsil of the ww1A p ** Clifforams . bored asy so meant lov"tea cr tras, $trr Of c uLtativ . from their standpoint in t invesion Problem Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007-5 no advance c TOP SECRET - SENSITIVE tion can be rec > d. l ferabiy tld be as fa: b, 0 + 2 ticatLoa a jastifLaaticn delis a, p*rs letters from to heads of state or countries and Canada. c. D +- 24"23 a basis, while reinforcing ships s 4. limits of tai action f. D + " *c>de0 l.a ne d ourr t oil a~ar~nt rep, pro to en rid by Steveamm in spew t at UN. 0 f Organ of Cotwults action by a in light of new situation TOP SECRET Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80B01676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07, L IA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 48 in accordance with notice given use forums US plans start overland sun. lia "way bonee *scort to protect D -j 48 j liar tip as necessary to sot significant rebel e tpons as discover el offensive us forces for +c world 24 how t available in Canal Zone for air transport to assist in aibls att of Latin America Cast-soviet sympathizers. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 2. .d be es ze4uir*d t Vill o iavad* ti rstl than notificatiea. b. D +' l~tterr M Wt to Etta a*4 W. K. A. m - Desixim to iv of prase t drafts. Inas e ire s, Pr*side t I. for O & . of g 'OVA special 3O meeting situation. due is pull sue. I) + 5-6 Win. of Coesuitation aut ri to ltd ne"sre 44""t Including armed attar Winces total blockade of Cuba state of war. 04- 6 prssents4 by St Latin :dean allies alerted to possible disorders, U$ sWport standby basis in Canal Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : +~ClA DP80B01676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 $. provided it ummea"M78 all U e around rtdd on no political moves 11-14 Invasion dram with help O Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Cen October 17, 1962 1. Ajr6 -Vie. without any politicas4 noti cYation, it the strike was a a1r, was in general eucces , and completely n before the" would be any chance for reaction, it to probable that the Soviets would confine the elves to polities action in the United Nations propaganda, and attempt to exploit any divisions which might appear in the `% ` est n Alliance. They might conceiv- ably take some action in Berlin, but would be unlikely to initiate any form of military action. t l v b r - air 1 I 1 Y~IrIIY e. , a denial that M bases were under con- took in his reply. Assuming a completely et reaction would deed, to some degree, upor. etruction in Cuba, which conceivably might indicate a physical re- construction of arose bases - which we could only h photographic connaluueance ..- or he might, in take a very tough line, drawing the analogy between our e and ley and the Soviet bases in Cuba, he might ten general nuclear war it the event of a United Sates action. If such were the reply, the situation would obviously be- come more dangerous, although it would not be conclusive evi- dence of met willings to respond militarily to an air strike. We would have to -wait to judge the temper, as well as the text of his reply. Fro e point of view of Soviet reaction, this would probably lie the most dangerous course of attic which we could take. expanded operation against Cuba weld no longer be merely to eliminate the MRBM bases and would confront the Soviets with a series of very difficult choices. It is po sssilale that limited military action against some of our NATO des or direct action in Berlin might be the Soviet response. Approved For Release 2004/07/d' 1 A-"` P80B01676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 eaction, tyre to a. very good chance that coiine thexnsebreees only to action In the Na o propag nda, etc. , and not InstibitA any mili- tsxy action under is course of action. The foregoing analyses deal only with probate Soviet reactions and do not dog with the general effect on the U sited .S s position ouahout the world. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 EC ?T CEB:mac Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TOP SECRET 1. The US has full info on the missile bases being constructed in Firm del Mar province. Medium range missiles capable of reaching a substantial portion- of US territory and most of the countries in the Caribbean area are being stalled at three sites. They obviously have no use except with nuclear heads. It also seems clear that they can only be operated by Soviet military, not Cubans. 2. Their presence raises ;rave issues of national security for the US and the Western Hemisphere as a whole as the President end the Congress have made clear. They represent Soviet offensive bases in Cuba as well as a ground-.to-ground missile capability capable of attacking the US and many of the Caribbean countries. In Soviet hands they are clearly offensive and not defensive weapons. 3. By putting these in Cuba the Soviets have also raised grave issues for Cuba. To serve their interests they have justified the Western Hemisphere countries in making an attack on Cuba which would lead to the immediate overthrow of your regime. At the same time Approved For Release 20few g"880Br01676RO01700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/OfoE"676R001700130007-5 the Soviets have quietly suggested to others that the threat these weapons represent may make it worthwhile to the US to trade concessions on Berlin for' Soviet abandonment of Cuba, 4. The US will have to informs its people of the threat which now exists in Cuba within the next day or so and what it and its allies intend to do about it in conformity with the requireuiei"Ats of our security as previously made plain in various public documents and statements. Unless It Sian receive assurances from you prior to that time, by public or privde channels, that you will not tolerate this misuse of Cuban territory, measures of vital significance for the future of Cuba will have to be initiated. 3. The US expects to continue to be well informed about the status of these facilities. If action does not follow immediately on the heels of such assurances as yo nay feel impelled to give, then we and our friends shall, of course, have to act. 6. If an attempt by you to deal with this problem should create difficulties within Cuba, I assu$e you will recall that President Kennedy said a year and a half ago that only two points were non-negotiable between the Western Hemisphere and Cuba- the Soviet tie and gtM"eRgc4/N. i/0- ~f 76 1 0 ry if , -TOP - Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 TOP ECRU Ce T O RESPONSE r U31 FIPPi AL, Few public figures have proven to be unpredi bl Fidel Castro. V Co not know whether he could take the decision alone, but would guess he wou consult several of hit aeeociates including one or two Old-line Cc runist . He would almost Sure compelled to check with oscow,, especiall .tce. Probably the he bed es are g-j t4 there as part of e'L whose terms adversely for Castro if he could no l accu iti be Changed r provide 3s unlikely short notice to be able to iase:f to the idea of help from the US for it stru ;f;l i a favarsble response might caulw. ,.Wey /Funty,?of c}rae, be q eps e L ap l,aei ante, Revealbi, and denouuoin a 4 hour might also go to U}t to charge interference in hie inter al affairs. ear .1k?.ly that he offers of eupport have not bey made categorical terms and that hir internal position is not one of g ; str z tho In this situation he might try to c+nfu the issue and stall for time, hoping for a solution to his dilena to appoi r. Approved For Release 200!fM:S >R1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004107/08 :~~CrrIIA-RDP80rBO1676R001700130007-5 SE An- Z1 he Q3-c1-lisle Cc pium for flat rcjec gbt le" to ma j or r' L of coonoiderab1c, poter f the iproR h. mi up betwen tht two groups, v taje to its. ' O ' SECRET Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 which You reaurim, to C e U, ., 4 system. tPreuuiez t o to brti iii be d t M these. e3. Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 kit O -W at A his eo can bases t I t c nt 4 Z t is CO& and 'AN - thruat r; the United &W" Butt with Cuba, but with v - Tr y d. I remind you that }4A other co protesW these Turlwy &U-4 It . -. There are no such bues In the Cra: ar utter to 1"Mi fl* 04gre-A are c , + tit bou r our, th 0 ' wtdc Approve For Release 2004/07/08 CIA-RDP80BO1676R001 700130007-5 Cum Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 p prWOM _ DL; }d in V YIC 11 th ~ AUIAIw L. nd I Ala b I Approved For Release 2004/07/08: CIA-RDP80B01676RO01700130007 Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5 it *IV Urfa ac ` , and It In CL 14 view of w 0 U: di i GGv cn a to mutu da y- er, Approved For Release 2004/07/08 : CIA-RDP80BO1676R001700130007-5