REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE ON IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF JOINT STUDY GROUP ON FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01676R000800060008-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
23
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 14, 2006
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 21, 1961
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01676R000800060008-2.pdf1.21 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 STATUS OF ACTIONS ON RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE JOINT STUDY GROUP ON FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT a.' L 21 August 1061 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 21 August 1961 REP ORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF JOINT STUDY GROUP ON FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF THE UNITED STATES GOVER'N'MENT A, The Joint Study Group Report on Foreign Intelligence Activities of the United States Government, dated 15 December 1960, B. Report on Implementation of Recommendations of Joint Study Group on Foreign Intelligence Activities of the United States Government, dated 1 May 1961, 1. The status of actions taken to date in implementing all of the recommendations of the Joint Study Group on Foreign Intelligence Activities of the United States Government (Reference A), as approved by the President on 18 January 1961, are reported in the following pages. 2. This report brings up to date the first report or. this subject, dated 1 May 1961 (Reference B), Prepared by The Coordination Staff of the Director of Central Intelligence TS #172991 Copy MORKIDIF Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Recommendation No. 1 To reorganize military intelligence consonant with Defense Reorganization Act of 1958. Action Responsibility: Defense Status. The Secretary of Defense on 1 August 1961 issued DOD Directive 5105.21 which established the Defense Intelligence Agenc4 (DIA) reporting to the Secretary of Defense through the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and provides that guidance to the Director, DIA, will be furnished by the Secretary of Defense, by the JCS acting under the authority and direction of the Secretary of Defense and by the U. S. Intelligence Board. The effective date for activating DIA is 1 October 1961 at which time the assumption of responsibi- lity for its assigned functions will be initiated on a graduated basis. The Director, DIA, has been designated as agent to monitor Defense's full compliance with all approved Joint Study Group Recommendations applicable to the Department other than those which fall within the National Security Agency area of responsibility. It is considered that the objectives of Recommendation No. 1 will be met when the DIA has assumed the specific functions and responsibilities assigned by the directive. Recommendation No. 2 Resources required by reorganization under Recommendation No. 1 to be drawn from existing resources. Action Responsibility: Defense Status. It is considered that the concept embodied in the directive creating the Defense Intelligence Agency is generally consistent with the objectives of this recommendation. TS #172991 Copy # Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 'P E R E :r Re c o:mmendat. i ar,. No. 3 ryl) '... -or tro'I. c>f intel.li.gen: ~ budge'ting ?aree by the Se rotary if Defense. Action Re ponstbility'o Defense "'at-a- L. Consolidation and. coordination of budget procedures for irtelligex ce operations and activities throughout all re:iementr -I- the Department'- of Defense. will be effected on full ;uiex n ation of tse directive creating the Defense Intelli- Y 1? Agency. Effective procedures combining the cryptologic ri\ eT2 operating for three years. Recommendation No. L Improvements in selection, training and rani. assigned to Intelligence duties. Action Responsibilit o Defense t' personnel Status. At the request of the Assistant t o the Secretary of Defense ", Spe,;,,ia.l Sperati x.ts ), the military departments have :malt, ~va,i.1acie a eomlrehensive statement of policy governing each department's provision for career development of officers w.nc are more ;han. ordinarily involved in intelligence and r e a 1. ;; s o These statements, toget per with related ba.:?kgrotnid mater .al, have been analyzed in the Office of pecia~. )perat:ions, and disc fissions have be-rn in:trig+;ed with the Jft'ice of Manpower, Department' of Def'erise { ex, pl .,r 7:ppr aches is imTr:-need management :princi'l;leE iriccI,n.d'i.ng ..~'..~e,''tiori ar.d training, which might enhance the cax?eer sta,t:s ax-G, imrrr. e the pr?~ essi ~r~a~ competence cf ir.din idimle duty. .y. is :o:[ls__d E'_'.:?vd Defense lritellfgen.~ Agency or ass ,xrp ,r _)n ?_)f' r s 7 { nc ty. o ~s as provided fn,. the directIiv,-~ will ',a1Re the necessary action to meet t11c Sh jei^.t' o e of Recommendation No. 5 Eu:c .a :sageme:lt; o-~ ,he uiilit;ary servi? es to maintain areai develop and= ::fine capabilities. Act_o:c, Res ?onsib lr:ty? Defense 2 TOP S E C R E T Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Status The military services have been. .1_-.di -e._+,l;r e .! ouraged to maintain and develop clandestire collection c:z a;bilit;ies by the implementation of other Joi_.t Snuu;~' gro?..p recor.,m.e_i.da.- tiorc , namely, those which concern rel. iri .?. per oun F'.:P.: O ann career development, training of Servi:-e I~rsornel for . lar:dest.:., ne intelligence work by CIA, and. i. t;pro; ed. `field oordi- nac.ion procedures. More direct encouragement vi--_l depend upon the impetus given by the Defense Intelligence Agency in carrying oct its assigned responsibilities with respect to plar,.~ programs, policies and procedures for Department at 2F.-Pen-se -ollection activities. The military departments have already been requested b;y + he Department of Defense to study mea.n.`.= a 71 _,T.Miementing this recommendation and submit their Recommendation No. 6 improvements in the Special Security 3f?i_.er s,rs..en.. Action Responsibility: Defense Status. The Department of Defense has in;restig~ited and taken corrective action in accordance with this recom_mer da t'ion, insofar as it is applicable w_thir: they Special Sec it.y- Officer sy- ea ?_elf, The possibility of dd.' pli 74 _O_ o' er-rice to non-mil' .tary- consumers as between tie Spe ia__ `'e.-,z,itj Officer system and the Central Intelligence Agency :ervi:-e is r:ov being considered by the Coo:rdinati o _ a.f of the icrecto:r of Central Intelligence. rte-ex:arnlra~ior_ of feasibility of placing more etec ro=_'.^ intelligence resou r e of :Y.ifs.ed commands ".lnd.er control of DiL e. :to - r;> r Oral ;e,cnri ; r ~g "SAN ~ctio Responeibi"ty: Defense 'I e -11Vector, 'SA, has P. 3}_ _red a Dyer, :__cLt io from the Join_., Staff to t e. r rr n.e o O L1~'_' n the allocation of art a _f r , .fn r .r'oty ements can be made. Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80B01676R000800060008-2 f 0 P S E O R E ' Recommendation No. 8 Strengthening control of Director, National Seer *_;:~ Zgenc,T, over service ':ryptologic agencies. Action Responsibility: Defense Status. Even before the issuance of the Joint Cam,'dy group Report, the Office of the Secretary of Defense had been. con- cerned about developments in the concept of part.r.ersr_i p between 4- lie National Security Agency (SA and. the -ervi.ce cryptologic agencies. As a result of the e'ff'ort; of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the oper,atiac_al control line from the Director, NSA, to field collection ur.its has been strengthened and made more direct, while sti11 retaining the organizational relationship between the 3e -.r ,ptologic agencies and those offices in the National Secc::r.tyAgency concerned with Army, Navy, and Air Force matters T- :Ar analogous instance, the Joint Processing ;;enter has been brought directly under the control. of tce turec,or, NSA. Recommendation No. 9 Reappraise adequacy of research and development s no ;provision for relocation of this facility during periods of national emergency. Recommendation No. 17 "entral =ntelligence Agency use of non-officinal c_ over. A,,+ion Responsibility: Central Intelligence Agency Status. Central Intelligence Agency "::A) is making realistic efforts to expand the effective use of non-official cover. CL published on 1 March 1961 an excellent analysis of the problems and pitfalls in the use of non-official cover, has: d 1ipnri. Agency experience over the years, to assist in the Y?pansion of the use of non-official cover in a well-planned. and operationally sound manner. The Cover and Caimacr.?r:ial Staff of c IA. is currently making a detailed analysts In. great depth the non-official cover possibilities four Y?~r+..ries as a p;ii Dtstudy. The proposal from the l IA S`.at ; ons in each of these four countries for fuyrher r ic)n doff ic::_al od er are being studied in Washington by this Staff and c:.oncl rsions and recommendations are presently being prepared. These studies have derived increased importance and timeli_oess in. view of the c.;rrent re-examination by the Department of S` ate and CIA Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 of the need for existing official cover with a view to an orderly red-sction. Such re-examination will require a ?~?.areful apt.ra=.sal of the possibilities of non-official cover in order +o er.: re that the over-all clandestine collection capabili+.y not impaired. Recommendation No. 18 Greater Community attention to counterintelligence and secarity 1rer:=ea ion Responsibility: United States irtellige.:ce Board. Sts On 28 February 196.1, the united St fntell.igence Bo;,ri assigned responsibility to its Security Corn ittee, in ooradnation with the Committee on Comm.;ni cat ions I n:tellige,: ce, for the preparation of recommendations for the in leme'.-tation of this recommendation, An ad hoc working gro'ap :haired. by the Cen*ral. Intelligence Agency and composed of r preser ta.ti.ves of the Departments of the Army, Navy, Air Force a:_d I..at..e> has undertaken this task. The principal efforts of the group are concerned with personnel and physical security standards and procedures relating to overseas installation, and the relationship of the counterintelligence f jn ?tiorn -,o 7.,h.is program- `lie group is exploring proposals to promote uniformity in over- seas security programs and a fuller exchange and u e of counter- in+.el.L_igence information by Security Officers re. por~sib.le to-r n programs. Recommendation No. 19 exploitation of intelligence opportuni .ies by ',a: r sistan-ce Advisory Groups (MAAGS) and military Action Responsibility: Defense. Scat::. As a result of recent actions by the "i?efs of Staff, there is now a greater awareness of i;:telli.gence re- ;' or the part of M.AAG and Mission person:.!-nel., re ulting greater contributions of intelligence i.r:forrr .* _or... Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 T 0 P S E C R E T Recommendation No. 20 Increased intelligence support to unified and component commands by information reports from Central Intelligence Agency field stations. Action Responsibility: Central Intelligence Agency Status. For the past several ears the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has, through the laterally disseminated to CINCPAC and component commands all telegraphic and dispatch information reports originating with the stations in the Far East, as well as direct dissemination from CIA Washington of reports such as the daily Central Intelligence Bulletin. Within the past year the falowing actions have been taken to provide intelligence support of a similar nature to other commands: (1) Instructions have been issued and faci- lities established for lateral dissemination of selected Agency telegraphic information reports to EUCOM through the CINCSOUTH throlia"h t CIA sentative [77~ o M through th I and toy ough CIA Headquarters to the Agency representative all intelligence reports received from Agency stations 25x1 at CINCLANT Headquarters in Norfolk; (2) procedures have been established for CIA Headquarters to pouch to the 25X1 JCS has solicited the views of all unified and component commanders concerning the present level of CIA intelligence support being received and additional support required. throughout Latin America, for passage to CINCARIB; (3) the Recommendation No. 21 Establishment of a central requirements facility. Action Responsibility: United States Intelligence Board. Recommendation No. 22 Use of Central Intelligence Agency Office of Central Reference as a reference facility. Action Responsibility: United States Intelligence Board. Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 TOP SECRE`T` Recommendation No. 23 Integration of collection requirements manuals, and creation of integrated country requirements g-Aides. Action Responsibility. United States Intelligence Board. Status. Efforts to implement these three recommendations have made little progress because of the uncertainty and differing views in the intelligence comm,:mity as to the meaning and intent of these recommendations, and reservations as to the need for the particular kind of remedial action which they seem to call for. In addition, implementation of these three recommendations depends to some degree --:;pon the ultimate organization of intelligence within the Department of Defense. (The Defense Intelligence Agency which is now being established will coordinate requirements which are generated within the Department of Defense and should thereby facilitate community- wide coordination in this field..) A number of steps have been taken in exploration of possible implementation procedures: At the suggestion of the DCI's Coordination Staff, the Office of Central Reference of Central Intelligence Agency has examined the feasibility of controlling, recording, and indexing requirements on punch cards, and has reported that this is feasible, and that the primary problem lies in whether the intelligence community can agree on the kind of service which is wanted from the punch cards. The Coordination Staff also suggested that the Department of State make an effort to determine whether it is feasible to expand the annual intelligence reporting guidance program for overseas posts to include the interests of other agencies, and thus serve as the basis for "integrated requirements guides on a country-by-country basis." The Coordination Staff prepared a draft outline of requirements procedures and placed it in the hands of representatives of. each agency in. the intelligence community for study and comment, but reactions to this outline have been so divergent that the Coordination Staff concluded that some form of pilot project should be undertaken first. The United States Intelligence Board on 1.1 July reTKested the Director of Central Intelligence assisted by his Coordination Staff to develop terms of reference for an ad hoc committee concerning requirements for Southeast Asia, as a pilot project in implementation of these three recommendations, taking into account the experience gained by an ad hoc ""SIB committee established on 5 July to examine into collection capabilities on southwest Communist China, North Vietnam, and. Communist- Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 _o:ntrol.led areas of Laos. As a basis for making recomen.d:a;t:,ioils to the ICI and USIB, the Coordination Staff is u:-indert ?k.ing an examination of current requirements for a selected. cocntry to ar_.al:Tze the problems involved in preparing a coordinated omm.~ it;v-wide requirements guide. Despite the lack of community consensus as co the precise mean .ng of these recommendations, the individia.a.:~. departments r a-je been reviewing and seeking means for improving their ov.^. re;:.i.rements procedures. As indicated :above, Wilder. present plans, the Defense Intelligence Agency will be charged with responsibility for coordination of all requirements originating within the Department of Defense. The Department of `'ta're h'.acc. c tiaced. on a limited scale, a program of a-.-rraal guidance to Foreign Service posts for reporting in fields of primary .; r:.eret to the Department. Several offices within CIA are ?k:rerimenting with new requirements formats, Recommendation No. 24 Coordination of overt and clandestine requirements by chiefs of mi.si.on. Action Responsibility: State, Central intelligence .11- e:-?geca ;y, and other agencies carrying on intelligence act:i~-ities abroad., Scat .s, '--he DCI's Coordination Staff has prepared a draft procedure for implementing this recommendation which was de.- signed to provide the basis for transmitting comprehe-,-:ive ;ad' coordinated guidance for our chiefs of mission abroad and the va.rio..;s agencies carrying on foreign overt and claicde'dre,.;- r i_telligennce activities. Consideration of thi>s draft Nro-ed-_,re ha.> not, yet been completed since a final .e4 erminatio?_ 'TitL respect, to the coordination of overt and clandestine requA.re- meu 13 awaits a decision on the more di.tfi.c ult. c too?:. as to ' daties and functions of our chiefs of mi.s o1_ ahro=:C vrr.ith e`, eCt to foreign clandestine activities. Meanwhile, however, much progress has, bee-:.nade cc thi ten subject and a preliminary guidance oord.i n - the Department of State, has been ;erg, to all e :c 9,l I tel ige^ce Agency Field Stations. ~s soon as a final determination has teen with respect:. to clandestine activities, it is believed t?^.:t the coordination yes ion, covered by Recommendation No. 24 cap, rapidly be resoled., Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 T 0 P SEC R E T Recommendation No. 25 Ar~rr'_xal evaluation report to the National Security Cn^unci.l. to pa specific attention to collection, and similar evaluations to ,q,:~ted from each chief of mission and military commander. Action Responsibilit : United States Intelligence Board. The President's Special Assistant for National Security Affairs has, by memorandum dated 11 July 1961, advised the D rector of Central Intelligence that it is no longer necessary s bmi , the Annual Report on the Status of the Foreign in- a1__gence Program. The need for such information will here- ar-.,ei be covered by current and ad hoc reports as necessary. This action, however, is not interpreted as eliminating the r..~cd for improved means of evaluating :intelligence i.lection acti ities. Accordingly, the Coordination Staff of the Director of Central Intelligence through its augmented member- ship has now undertaken an examination of existing systems wig. in each of the agencies for evaluating collection efforts, as a basis for a report and recommendations to the DCI for United States Intelligence Board consideration. Recommendation No. 26 Coordination of military requirements by Defe.n.se. k-,tion Responsibility: Defense Sttatus. The directive establishing the Defense intelligence Agency provides that it will be responsible for the assembly, n egration and validation of military requ'~rcments; assign-- =rt of 'Priorities thereto, and for the establishment of a Defense Collection Requirements Registry sr..d. Facility. Recommendation No. 27 ..ar_smission of political information overtly ,acgaired by r?a. '~:n`,e!ligence Agency through mission's political se:-_+tion. Ac t i.~,_ Responsitilit : State and Central Inteligence Agency S'elks. The substance of this Recommendation has been agreed C -l red Intelligence Agency and State policy for some time. n1 ;1YA re lation concerning the +. g u g general :sul? j ze . of f geld Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 station reporting has recently been revised and contains a section covering this subject. In addition, the Office of the Deputy Director (Plans) of CIA has sent a dispatch to all field stations and bases calling this particular Recommenda- tion to their attention and requesting fail cooperation in its implementation. Recommendation No. 28 Achievement by the Director of Central intelligence of 4t: a=.i on through normal command channels. Action Responsibility: Director of Central intelligence (Coordinator). Status. The Director of Central Intelligence has continued to make increased use, whenever appropriate, of command channels in handling coordination problems. For example, these channels were used for exchanging views regarding Recommendation No. 1 (Defense organization), initiating action on Recommendations No. 13 (clandestine training) and 39 (Research and Development), and establishing the Coordination Staff pursuant to Recommendation No. 29. Recommendation No. 29 E_tat lishment of a Coordination Staff, separate from any ag_r:c..;r, to support the Director of Central intelligence in develop- ing: sololions to coordination problems. Action Responsibility: Director of Central Intelligence Coordinator) Sna' us. The Coordination Staff currently cons.sts of an Assistant for Coordination and Deputy Assistant appointed 'by the DCT_, three members assigned from Central intelligence Agency, and one member each detailed from State, Army, Navy, Air Fore and National Security Agency. Consideration is being given within Defense to furnishing one additional staff member from Defense. Liaison arrangements have been mach with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Atomic Energy Commission. The principal activity of the Coordi- nation Staff has been assisting the DCI in following ap on implementation of approved Joint Stiidy Group (,-Su) Recom- mendations. In particular, the staff has taken the lead in Approved For Release 2006106/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 assisting the DCI and USIB regarding actions to implement certain JSG Recommendations relating to requirements, evalua- tions, JSIB management role, annual program reviews, SIB :ommittees, and cost and manpower data. In addition, the taff has actively participated in actions on many other JSG Peommendatiors, sought through consultations and briefings to identify and help solve other inter-agency coordination probiems (e-g., space surveillance), and assisted in advising the ICI on specific coordination questions (especially regarding :i "i(ie.-`tine collection). Recommendation No. 30 Reduction in membership of United States Intelligence Board, nh=, ed it,- Defense reorganization. Action Responsibility: Defense - Director of Central Tn.telli- ge_nce_ Status. When the above recommendation was considered by the National Security Council on 12 January 1961, the Secretary of Defense reserved his position as to the manner of reorgani- e'.i:fir, military intelligence under Recommendations No, 1 and 2, and the ?;SC Action stated that steps regarding the "organi.- za..tior and f';nctions of the USIB should be taken in phase vi`.h the carrying out of the related internal adjustments with n. the intelligence components of the Department of 1fer3e.. These internal adjustments are now being made and the now . i ef'ense Intelligence Agency (DIA) will be activated as of. 1.3 tober 1961. The directive setting up the DIA provided, th-" it would be represented on the USIB. It did not resolve :-_F ,j~estion with respect to the possible representation on. ":gin' ` ed States Intelligence Board of other Defense elements. is understood that this matter will be the subject 01 disc'usion between the Secretary of Defense and the Director of `:e_tral intelligence before final action is taken. Recommendation No. 31 .shment by United States Intelligence Board of a manage- :rn.F to analyze and propose solutions to community problems of Approved For Release 2006106/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 non-substantive administration and management type. The National 5.; xrity Council agreed that the functions proposed for the manage- ment grip should be performed by the Coordination Staff of the DCI. Action Responsibility: Director of Central Intelligence - United. States Intelligence Board. Status. The Coordination Staff is still giving primary atten- tion to administrative and management problems arising in the course of implementing recommendations of the Joint Study Group. it is, in addition, identifying and seeking solutions to problems involving two or more agencies which might require Jnited States intelligence Board attention, e.g., it is currently examining problems relating to space surveillance. Specifically, it has recommended, and USIB has approved, a pr: edure whereby the Coordination Staff will review all new plane- for periodic intelligence publications in Washington tc prevent duplication. Recommendation No. 32 Annual review by United States Intelligence Board of intelli- gence plans and programs. Action Responsibility: United States Intelligence Board jointly wi l the Director of Central Intelligence. Status. The Coordination Staff of the DCI has completed and sibmitted to the United States Intelligence Board a report summarizing the over-all FY 1963 programs in comparison with N, " 1962 programs. This report is based upon information sub- mitted by each member of the Intelligence Community concerning its foreign intelligence program for FY 1963. While short- ccmings exist in the initial effort, due largely to the short peer icd of time allowed for development of a format and in- .tructions, and for the preparation of the various program submissions themselves, the Coordination Staff believes that considerable valuable experience has been gained to facilitate futtre program reviews, and that certain useful comments and recommendations have evolved from the review just completed. Recommendation No. 33 Review of committee structure of United State intelligence Board. Action ResponsibIlity: Director of Central intelligence Coordinator , - 16 - Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Status. At the 25 July United States Intelligence Board ("SIB) meeting, the decision was made that the Communications Intelli- gence Committee and F1bctronics Intelligence Committee should be merged. Augmentation of the membership of the Coordination Staff of the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) has made it possible to initiate a review of the functions and activities of the other USIB committees on a selective basis. As the st dy progresses, reports with conclusions and any recommenda- tions for changes will be submitted to the DCI for TSIB consideration. Recommendation No. 34 ?ransmittal of intelligence guidance to unified commands "roag'_1 channels directed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (except %at:i.ona.i Security Agency communications). Action Responsibility: Defense. flatus. It is noted that this function will now be assumed by the new Defense Intelligence Agency. Recommendation No. 35 control and command by unified commanders over intelligence activities of component commands. emotion Responsibility: Defense. Status. The National Security Council deferred action on this recommendation. Recommendation No. 36 Chiefs of mission to take positive steps to effectively co- ordinate all overt intelligence collection and reporting activities. Action Responsibility: State. Status. The Department of State has, since January 20, 1961, emphasized this recommendation in briefings of all chiefs of mission and other personnel departing for overseas posts. Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 The doordination role itself has long been outlined in the Foreign Service Manual. In addition, the Department has under consideration a circular instruction to all~'diplomatic missions abroad re-affirming and re-emphasizing previous directives concerning the affirmative responsibility of chiefs of mission to coordinate overt collection activities overseas. Recommendation No. 37 Operational clandestine coordination continued by Central .-aul.ligence Agency field stations, but referral to Director of eritral Intelligence before proposed operation is rejected. Action Res ohsibilit : Director of Central Intelligence Coordinator . Status. The Director of Central Intelligence sent a personal dispatch to all of his designated representatives abroad on 14 June 1961 calling Recommendation No. 37 to their attention and instructing them to make every effort to resolve differences locally; and pointing out that if there is disagreement be- tween the designated representative and an agency concerning a problem under Director of Central Intelligence Directive No. 5/1, which cannot be resolved in the field, the matter shall be referred to Washington for resolution by the Director of Central Intelligence, each agency using its own channels for referral. Copies of the dispatch were given to the military agencies prior to its being sent to -the field and the military agencies were requested to issue complementary messages to military installations abroad. The Departmetts dT the Navy, Army and Air Force have each sent complementary messages to appropriate commands abroad. Recommendation No. 38 Determination as to activities which properly are foreign Intelligence, and an improved system for utilizing dollar and man- power data in the entire U. S. foreign intelligence effort. Action Responsibility: United States Intelligence Board. Status. Assistance to the United States Intelligence Board in determining which activities properly are foreign intelli- gence is being undertaken by the Coordination Staff in con- junction with the annual review of intelligence plans and Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 T 0 P S E C R E T programs discussed above under Recommendation No. 32. The Coordination Staff will, in preparing subsequent instructions, develop an improved basis for appraising the level and allo- cation of effort in future program reviews, including appro- priate utilization of dollar and manpower data. Implementation of the directive creating the Defense Intelligence Agency will assist these processes materially. Recommendation No- 39 More effective coordination of research and development acti- dit..es for intelligence purposes. Action Responsibility: Defense and CIA. Status. Representatives designated by the Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency, together with a representative of the Coordination Staff, are studying means and procedures for achieving the objective of this recommenda- tion. In the course of this study, two areas of coordination relative to research and gevelopment have been identified. The first area is concerned with coordination of scientific and technical efforts themselves; with respect to this area of coordination, the representatives are in agreement as to a proposed mechanism and procedure. The second area of coordination is concerned with community-wide evaluation or assessment of the intelligence usefulness of proposed research and development projects. Differences remain to be resolved by the representatives concerning the need end mechanism for this area of coordination. It is recognized, however, that the extent and diversity of research and development activities within the Department of Defense create, in addition to the problem of obtaining continuous comprehensive knowledge of such activities, a f?a*~er problem of achieving an awareness by the scientists and technicians of intelligence needs and recognition that a development originated for another purpose can be exploited t:f:, solve an intelligence problem. Recommendation No. 4+0 Monitoring the development of automatic data systems for storage and retrieval of intelligence information. Action Responsibility: United States Intelligence. Board. - 19 - T 0 P S E C R E T Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Status. The United States Intelligence Board (USIB' assigned this problem to its Committee on Documentation (CODIB) and approved the establishment of an ad hoc full time, community- wide staff t:) examine in detail the long-range information prs_essing problems of the USIB agencies in the light of :.arrent and projected developments in the field of data handling. The tremendously increasing volume of information h ~oming available and the rapid development of new systems and concepts in this field, will make the solution of these pr )hl.ems one of the most difficult and important yet: under- taken. in the community, and require the wholehearted coopera- t !yr of departments and agencies. Recommendation No. 41 Added attention to foreign developments in agent communications. Action Responsibility: Central Intelligence Agency. Status. The Central Intelligence Agency has well-established technical. liaison channels with the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Japan to ensure current knowledge of any develop- ments in these countries pertinent to the problem of agent communications. Developments in other countries possessing a potential in the field of telecommunications are also re- viewed periodically for this purpose. Recommendation No. 42 United States Intelligence Board to strongly support counter- io surveillance efforts. Action Respongibility: United States Intelligence Board. States. On 28 February 1961, the United States intelligence Board (USIB) assigned to its Security Committee responsibi- lity for recommending such action as would be necessary to implement this recommendation. The report of the Committee, _Uhd.ch isr awaiting USIB consideration, recommends positive actions to be taken to improve the counter-audio surveillance efforts of the departments and agencies, and further recommends that the USIB suppori the recommendations contained in the annual report of the National Security Council Special Committee on Technical Surveillance Countermeasures. This latter men- tioned report has not yet been acted upon goy the National Securi yy Council. Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2 T 0 P S E C R E T Recommendation No. 43 Establishment by the intelligence community of specific arrangements for planning its work and anticipating its problems. Action Responsibility: United States Intelligence Board. Status. Activation of the Coordination Staff of the Director of Central Intelligence constitutes a specific arrangement for assisting the intelligence community to plan its work and anticipate its problems. At the request of the Staff, and with USIB approval, the members of the community have submitted statements outlining the principal variations of their planned fiscal year 1963 plans and programs from those of FY 1962, and the long-range implications of these variations. The Staff has analyzed these statements and prepared for USIB consideration a summary report together with certain recommendations. Experience in preparing this report and discussion and action by USIB thereon should assist the community in undertaking additional and more thorough examination of planning arrangements and procedures. Approved For Release 2006/06/14: CIA-RDP80BO1676R000800060008-2