LETTER TO MAJ GEN. EDGAR C. DOLEMAN FROM LYMAN B. KIRKPATRICK

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80B01676R000300130028-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 8, 2003
Sequence Number: 
28
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 6, 1964
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80B01676R000300130028-7.pdf208.74 KB
Body: 
lir Approved For Release 2003/05/29 : CIA-RDP80601 Sc001 MN. Gen. Edgar C. Dolora* Aviiistant Chief of Staff 5for Intelligence Department of the Army Washington, D. C. 20310 Dear General Doleman: pill 1964 This is in response to your letter to General Carter of 30 March concerning the U.S. Defector Program. I believe that most of the matters referred to in your letter hare been affected by the action of the USIB on 2 April, which, I believe, is in the direction in which you are anxious for matters to proceed. We will COIdiXtUll to follow this matter closely and I wtli be in touch with you. LBK:drm Distribution: Original - Addressee ER 1 - ExDir Army review(s) completed. Sincorely yours. R00030013028-4. (signed) Lyman B. Kirkpatrick Lyman B. Kirkpatrick Executive Director Approved For Release 200.3/45/Z CIA-RDP80601676R000300130028-7 ..:Approved For Release art CIA-RDP80B01676R000300130028-7 4. 2-2-1 ACSI-CX Central Intelligence agency Washington, D. C. 20505 Attentioas, Deputy Director Deer general Carters should like to call to your attention the confusion within the U. S. Defector Program which / believe has been generated its a result of the 1 August 1962 ruling of the United States Inteliteencs Saud, that "in the futore the Jangling of defectors from an opposition foreign intelligence service should be discussed in en exeeutive session of the USD." I did not, of course, participate in the August 1962 discussions; however, ? review of the cases since then has convinced as that insuf- ficient guidance was provided those who, must become involved in the handling. exploitative', and resettlement of intentness defectors. More important, the action takes in 1962 by-passed an already existing and working mechanism. the Int:regency Defector Committee. At the 14 lebruery 1964 meeting of the IDC my representative offered a set of procedures for the handling of intenigence defectots for the discussion of the Committee. I feel that sush action clearly falls within the functions of the IDC established in paragraph 2 of During the recent 23 March 1964 IDC meeting the various 25X1 members agreed that precedures were required, but, emeept for Army and DIA, felt that MIS had preempted the IDC'e responsibility in such cases. The DIA member abotained from voting. The current case of the Polish code clerk defector from the United Notions was also broached by the Amy member during the 23 March 1.964 meeting. Previous to the meeting the PSI member bed stated that the PSI would be ready to turn this source over to the *teeter Committee in about two weeks for exploitation on behalf of the community. I was quite surprised to learn that during the above mooting, the Chairman of the IDC took the position that since WIN bed not indicated how this case was to be handled, be, the Chairmen, sould not than accept ved For Release 204fta ; CIA-RDP801Eal?pg99.1:1(411001_3,01::128gRA:) -s F APPLY CS.-I X1 _Approved For Release 2003h:15/29 CIA-RDP80601676R000300130028-7 AC101.41 'General Carter a) this case. The Army member concurred in the FBI position that there was no reason why the case eould not be accepted by the Committee. The other members (DIA abstained from voting) agreed that the Chair- man should seek a position from USIS. in the meantime, based on the FBI report concerning the Polish 0S *ode clerk, both the Army Seturity Agency and the Army coanteriatelligsece production section hove indicated extreme interest La debriefing this source. Undoubtedly other Defense requirements will be generated as more information becomes aveiLable concerning this source's knowledgeability. The DIA member of the IDC has indicated his intention to recommend that Army undertake the debriefing of this source and, if requested to do so, my office will accept this responsibility. This action must now be held is abeyant* pending a USIA 'alias. I feel that the above 'mansion is a natural result of our failure to use the IBC for the purpose for which it was OSSOlilhed. I recommend that the 1 August 1962 ruling be abrogated. The IOC is en extension of 0/11 and if any member feels that that. are insufficient safeguards within the printout defector directives to deal with the special aspects of intelligence defectors / believe he should use his membership or entree to the IDC to introduce within that Committee whet he feels to be the required changes. / also recommend that the Polish soda clerk be referred to the 1DC for esploitation on behalf of the intelligence community as soon as the FBI makes him available. The above actions vial use the 19C to perform the functions assigned to it suoll remove the necessity for the USIS membership to concern itself with operational details and reports resorting every case of defection from hostile intelligemee. They will also be in has with Mr. hConies letter of 28 January 1964 which, in response to State's request for a review of defector handling procedures within the United States, indicated that State's reeommendatiens would be referred to the Inter.. agency Defector Committee. I believe that* continuing application of this principle will work to everyone's benefit. I am eitudiug a copy of this letter to the interested members of the community. Sincerely, mu C. DOLMAN ,IMAjor General, GS ? ;.CofS for Intelligence ;2 Approved For R ImeQ2 A-RDP801301676R000300130028-7 Approved For Release 2003/05/29 : CIA-RDP80601676R000300130028-7 STAT Approved For Release 2003/05/29 : CIA-RDP80601676R000300130028-7