IG SURVEY OF INDUSTRIAL SECURITY

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP80B01676R000300080011-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 19, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 26, 2006
• Sequence Number: 11
• Publication Date: January 4, 1966
• Content Type: MF

DD/S&T 093-66
4 January 1966
MEMORAND 1JM FOR:
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE: Your Memo dated 13 December 1965 - ~S- fUa'
1. You asked for my comments on the second part of
the 1G's recommendation 10: "If the Agency must retain in-
spection and review responsibility for DOD contracts under
the NRP, include in an Agency Regulatory Issuance clearly
delineated assignments of functions to the DD/S&T Security
Staff and to the Special Security Center for the discharge
of that responsibility". $
2. 1 believe it is desirable to have delineations of
responsibilities of the Special Security Center and the
DD/S&T Security Staff for security surveys and reviews of
DOD contracts under the NRP. I understand the Office of
Security is planning to prepare a proposed regulation or
instruction setting forth the responsibilities of the Special
Security Center and others in this respect. I think this is
a good step.
3. With respect to the costs to CIA involved in in-
specting security pro rams of DOD contractors engaged in the
NRP, only Staff Employees are involved in carry-
ing out these unctions.
 0()300080011-1
FOR : Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
MEMOg,ANUUM troller
ROUGH : Executive Director-comp
TH of CIA Industrial
Spector General Survey
September 1965
SUBJECT Security Program of
a
andum submits recommendations Tapyour
This memor
s these -recommendations are contained in p feted
approval; comp recently The Office of the Inspector General procedures- This
2' Agency industrial security its survey of the Ag responsibility
clearly indicates the need for centralizing
survey policy and guidance.
for security eCifically that
3 , The Inspector General recommended specifically
for Su port seek authorizationsfr from th(aDeputy
for
the Deputy Director fo pce to assume responb and pro-
dards,
Director of Central Intellignen~orm doctr
g and pub and ines, maintenance stanOf security of
developinlislish matters
the establishment tract Secu ty
cedures for th (b) for placing and (c) that the Deputy
contractual arrange, cognizance)
under continuing and Genera eS? ponsibility to the Director of
Director for Support del g
Security. and herewith request
4, I concur in ement these hrecommendations an
authorization to impl t
 Approved For Release 2006/07/28: CIA-RDP80B01676R000300080011-1
Approved For Release 2006/07/28: CIA-RDP80B01676R000300080011-1
 M IORANWM P'OR: btecutive Director-CoMptroller
SUBILCT: Survey Report on Industrial Security
1, We appreciate the spirit of DD/S's memorandum of
c-December 13 and understand his reasons for non-concurrence
at this time in two of our recommendations.
2. We continue to feel strongly that our basic
recommendations on costs, security classifications and
security standards are especially pertinent to the DD/S&T,
including the National Reconnaissance Program. As we
noted in the sport, "We think it is time to question same
of the fundamental assumptions and premises on which
security programs of the National Reconnaissance Program
are based."
3. We would hope that the Director of Security, the
Deputy Director for Science and Technology and the Director
of Reconnaissance would collaborate on a fresh look at
these matters along the lines recommended.
P80BO1676R000300080011"=