THE AFRICA DOSS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-01601R000700160001-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 3, 2000
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 21, 1972
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-01601R000700160001-0.pdf560.11 KB
Body: 
' British secret ser As British influence in Africa declined, so did British secret ser b~m hundreds of agents to African capitals like Accra, La din g sen to buttress "sensitive" states against communism and protect E. H. Cookridge continues his exclusive series on the CIA 117.1:1 1A/1t JJ.J D1'1MY - - l T,.taArr. Approved For Release 2OM31,L : CIA-RDP80-0 ~ G~f~~3gC?G1 HE adventurous operations often bordering on the bizarre which the Central Intelligence Agency pursued in many parts or the world are usually ascribed to one man: Allen Dulles. They culminated in the abortive in- vasion of Cuba in 1961. When Dulles departed from the directorship of CIA after the Bay of Pigs debacle, he certainly left an indelible stamp of his _ influence as the architect of the mighty CIA edifice and its worldwide rami- fications. The policy of his successors has, been no less forceful. CIA however , activities under its present director, -z -( appear less aggressive because they are _t being conduted with greater caution and less publicity, and because they have ? been adroitly adjusted to the A bloodless co- in Uganda in January last changing climate in international poll- and installed Major-General Idi Amin as mill tics. In the past CIA gained notoriety a section of his troops). How far was the C1 by promoting revolutions in Latin protest in Santa Domingo. A pro-rebel poster attacks American tnrervennan d sup- American banana republics, an porting anti-communist regimes in South-East Asia. Its operations in Africa were more skilfully camou- flaged. For many years they had been on a limited scale because the CIA had relied on the British secret service to provide intelligence from an area where the British had unsurpassed ex- perience and long-established sources of information. But with the emergence of the many African independent countries, the wave of "anti-colonial- ist" emotions, and the growing in- filtration . of Africa by Soviet and Chinese "advisers", British influence declined. Washington forcefully into the breach. h CIA throu d , g , steppe with the avowed aim of containing communist expansion. Financial investments in new in- \1.~ =ra?`'` dustnal and mining enterprises, and , .* lavish economic aid to the emerging , governments of the "underdeveloped" men began hurriedly to establish their 'rig served for many years as a skilful countries, paved the road for the influx "stations" in Accra, Lagos, Nairobi FBI agent before joining CIA and of hundreds of CIA agents. Some com- Kampala, Dar-cs-Salaam, Lusaka, the being employed at Addis Ababa, bined their intelligence, assignments "sensitive areas" in danger of slipping Nairobi, and Dar-es-Salaam, acquir- with genuine jobs as .technical, agri- under communist sway. ing fluency in Swahili. By 1965 the cultural and scientific advisers. By the mid-1960s several senior CIA Accra CIA Station had two-score . The British Government - parti- officials, such as Thomas J. Gunning active operators, distributing largesse pularly after the Labour Party had and Edward Foy, both former U.S.' among President Nkrumah's secret come to power in 1964 - withdrew Army Intelligence officers, were firmly adversaries. t f th it SIS and MI5 officials established at Accra. They were later The Americans had every intention STATINTL STATINTL mos o from African capitals, though some joined by William B. Edmondson, who of helping Ghana's economy by build- remained, atAp icot'1 91riI e1 ~0'ff 0 ~ Y o rulers, to ,organise their own new in- Africa, an tc la outs, sortium, the Vo a u o i - telligence and security services. CIA attractive, motherly woman, whom' ing hydro-electric power for the, nn nn,- wnd have SUSDected of hav- r. ?~r.t i r.?,.. .7 Guardian . 7 February 1970 Approve) For Releage 2001/03/04?x: A-RDPa-01601 R0Q07J I Fdllowing is a reply to a criticism by the .- \ .Richard' Ward, the Guardian's. foreign editor, accidentally coincide with Nigeria's entry into. writes: :. r the 'ranks of the world's leading oil producers. struggle in his country could be viewed in terms'., are'so fond of citing, the demand for a separate -'of a piece of straw resting on a rock: the straw nation only arose when Ojukwu' thought he. being the Saigon regime and the rock U.S. im- could finance his bid for 'power with oil reve- perialism. Once the rock is. smashed, the straw' nues and was given encouragement by U:S. and would. obviously fall, he said, while making an . British oil corporations. There was no popular. expressive motion with his fist. . ' demand for independence, no guerrilla warfare, This analogy illustrates a basic truth-that, indicating that the Ibo masses were behind the' .U.S. :- imperialism is 'the cause 'of 'the' war in secession. Vietnam and that without the support. of the ` "In 1967, the Ibos became intensely oil- U.S., the Saigon regime will collapse. This is not minded," wrote the. Paris newsweekly L'Ex- :to.say that internal questions in South Vietnam .i"Press in its Jan. 19 issue. "From their..territory,' have no importance, but the fundamental'ele-. i'they thought they 'could cut the oil lines and. merit is U.S. imperialism. exploit the 67% of the [Nigerian oil] reserves A confusion of primary and secondary}ques- located in their province. This factor gave them -.lions was made by the Africa' Research Group's ' the illusion of strength and pushed them to criticism of the Guardian Viewpoint Jan. 24 on -take the risk of secession. . ":'the war in Nigeria. The editorial and a longer "When the flag of secession 'was raised in article in the same issue discussed both, the Biafra," wrote Lawrence Fellows in the Jan. 30 internal forces within Nigeria and historical role N.Y. Times, "as the Biafrans saw it.. oil was to, of imperialism, providing specific facts docu=. be the foundation of their republlc't .wealth.'' menting the relationship between Gen..' As early as Jan. 23, 1967, Le Monde reported Ojukwu's secessionist movement 'and the oil nine of 12'oil companies operating: in Nigeria;. monopolies, demonstrating that Western oil in- . were American and by self-interest the U.S. was f - -terests were behind the war. sympathetic to the cause o Lt. Col. Ojukwu. ~. Gulf Oil in particular was said to be "very 1:" favorable to the separatists, as was Shell Ignoring the facts British Petroleum, which'then" controlled 85%. STATINTL ARG stated U.S. corporations should beThe Biafra war effort quickly bogged down called "into account" for tjheir role in Nigeria after an initial'summer 1967 offensive and its .-...and that "the presence of tlie.oil companies was'"U.S. and British backers quickly changedtteir ..significant," yet they completely evaded dis- stance, but then 'the smaller vultures; :,the cussing the actual relationship between the oil French and Italian national oil companies, interests and' Biafra. This omission invalidates stepped"in and gambled on Ojukwu. C.L. Sulz- their analysis. Anything can be,proven in, poli burger., has clearly revealed that in the eyes of tical "analysis" if one ignores basic facts. ? imperialism the era of Rudyard Kipling was not Despite an anti-imperialist posture and - dead. In The Jan. 23 N.Y. Times; Sulzberger ,.claims of putting forward "a radical class-based . wrote: analysis," ARG's statements'in the Guardian "French policy in Nigeria lid down by de -and other publications serve to obscure the Gaulle, paralleled French policy in the Congo. situation in Nigeria and minimize the real xole ? In each case it sought to pry loose from an of imperialism. 'Anglo-Saxon' zone of influence huge and pros- This was not ARG's, intention, but it appears porous chunks-Katanga, with its copper and to be a classic case of inability attention see the the to cer- uranium, from a pro-American Congo, and Bia- .for the e trees. ARG has called fra, with its oil, from a pro-British Nigeria. tain mechanisms, such as aid programs, by Another article, "A Strong Smell of Oil," in which imperialism tries to maintain its control'- ; and confused them with the driving forces be- ' ,the Jan. 27 Jeune Afrique, calls attention to the hind imperialism. tole of AGIP,'a subsidiary of ENI, the Italian While advising us "to, learn something about r national oil corporation, which reportedly paid. 'the actual conditions" in the third world, ARG the Biafran treasury $3 million in June 1969. appears to be unaware that 'the search for profit ' France was one. of the main arms suppliers is the heart of the question, of imperialism. ? to Biafra. With characteristic imperialistic can- Specifically, ARG says "our task.i:s'not,to rail dor, Paris claimed that the French-made arms against the 'greed of the oil companies'' and must have been given by sympathetic African that "the bloodshed in NigeLia did not come countries. But Jacques Decornoy reported in spouting out of an, oil well." Trn an all too.. the Jan. 20 Le Monde that this assertion caused unfortunate extent, ' however, it did in fact. smiles in Libreville, capital of Gabon. "One' come "spouting out of an oil well" and to, miss cannot see how Gabon could have furnished this point miss mu 'f th reason for the thousands of tons of arms 'and ? munitions," lltln a' ove or? eieas'e'. 0.04 rnGJA-RDP8-0-:01601 R000700160amN=0 Finally, the r eQujd4,S ~ r#An#01/03/04 CIA-RDP80-01601 R000700160001 -0 different u d k believe. ~ Both nominally supported Nigeria, once Ojukwu floundered. The British supplied arms, but not enough to bring the war to a conclusion. The U.S. embargoed arms to both the Nigerians and Biafrans (if we discount reports of CIA involvement) and it furnished economic aid to both, as did Britain. Neither British nor U.S. actions are consistent with the view that they favored a strong, unified Nigeria. What they wanted was a prolonged war which they thought would leave Nigeria riven by inter- nal rivalries, as were fostered by the federal . institutions imposed under British colonialism. This 'does not exhaust the story .of imperi- alist intervention in Nigeria. But it should be i '.clear that although Africans did the fighting, it was at bottom a war for oil, a war instigated and promoted by the greed of. the oil com- panics. The Africa Research Group's article in the Jan. 31 Guardian contained the sentence: "Imperialist institu- preceding tions cannot be checked. " That and its sentence should be: '7f imperialist tnstitutionseannot be checked, the pattern of Nigeria-Illafia- may be repeated in other parts ofAfrica." Approved For Release 2001/03/04: CIA-RDP80-01601 R000700160001-0 1'x0S ANU:I lsS TIMES Approved For Release 200,1103 Q0Gl DP80-016 Lagos Radio Assails U.S., Britain, Holland Exclusive to The Tlmos from Reuters LAGOS, Nigeria-Radio Nigeria Tuesday criticized the United States, Britain and. the Netherlands as !fair. weather friends and 'paid the Soviet Union had'. Mono more than any other nation , to 'help Nigeria crush its rebellion. P In a commentary, read ' aftcr:news bulletins, the ;cation' said, the United 1', Rates had` adopted a poll- . cy of, r+egative neutrality: ;awhile ? the , Central, Intel- 1 ligenceAgency was pour- ing weapons and money into the rebel camp. The commentary singled' out for greatest criticism the Netherlands, which over did not "give what t happened in Nigeria w as long as its. oil interests were not affected. -. . _,_- ...,1.4 w had been cool in the past,. had stepped in like a true friend when fair weather feet at the crucial moment ,in the early stages. of the war, the commentary said, when the rebels . had ap- peared to be g a i..n i n g strength. However,- it had changed later, the,, state- ment added. said 'The commentary the Soviet Union, toward hich Nigerian relations friends had failed. . Russia sold arms and equipment for "raw cash," the commentary said. "Thanks to the Soviet, Union, the federal governi, ment apcceeded in.crush- ing the`. rebellion ".. it, con- cluded: } y STATINTL Approved For Release 2001/03/04: CIA-RDP80-01601 R000700160001-0 11~~Guardian STATINTL Aaaroved For Release 220'~~i~-RDP80-016 revenues. General Ojukwu and the group he spoke for were STATINT willing to settle for less-and Biafra was launched. only France and the French oil interests fully backed Ojuk- wu to the end. France was betting on Ojukwu in hopes of gaining a larger share of the oil concession at the expense of British and U.S. companies. Once it was clear that a long war was in prospect, the !.The war ends None but the most diehard. reactionaries could feel any thing but satisfaction that the civil war in Nigeria has finally ended. The attempted secession of Biafra was never in' the'; -interests of the Nigerian masses, including the Ibos, who I 'dominated Biafra. Recognizing how far Nigeria must go to produce a social `system reflecting the needs of the Nigerian people, there was never any question that the break up of Africa's largest state was a regressive development, bound only to benefit ,,imperialism. In essence, the struggle over Biafra was a consequence of neo-colonialisrn, of Western imperialism striving to increase. Its profits in Nigeria. It is not a.mcre coincidence that when Biafra sought to secede in May 1967 the overwhelming bulk ' .In .this connection : it .is important to remember' that before Biafra's secession the federal government had pre. sented a request for an increase of its share in the oil 'were used to gain..."independcnce." Western imperialism, never lost the upper hand. After plans for a quick secession had been furstrated, 1 ly bogged down and the Nigerian army, which was not ,?i 'r simply lighting tiny Biafra but countering a major drive by i Contrary to the expectations of the oil companies and despite the assistance from the West, Ojukwu's effort quick- to hinder the huge "private" relief operations, which were an important factor in keeping the war going. Armaments, it is well known, sometimes arrived on the relief planes,- U.S. and Britain backed Nigeria officially but did nothing CIA involvement in these mercy flights may well be con. Express reported that Ojukwu was spirited out of Nigeria in ,? . an unmarked aircraft-one of the CIA's so-called ghost'; planes used for especially secret operations. The U.S. policy called for a compromise settlement. if -, secession would not work, the oil companies and Washing- ;''' ton sought some kind of semi-autonomous arrangement which would have weakened Nigeria although it would have preserved Nigerian hegemony. The actual outcome, total defeat for Biafra, was the last `development anticipated by imperialist interests. it was an,',, ;important victory for Nigeria, but it cannot be forgotten,.`,.; .that imperialism remains solidly entrenched in Nigeria. Bri-? :tish and l,l.S. capital dominate the economy. The strategy of contemporary imperialism-ncocolon-. ..ialism-involves the uses of puppets like Diem, Thicu, Ky ',,:and the others who do U.S. bidding in Vietnam, or like `?Ojukwu, from one of Nigeria's richest families and closely tied to Western economic interests. Neocolonialism also,;':;, seeks to perpetuate the internal rivalries it fostered in the:i colonial era when Africa was carved u without th li h , p e s g t- ."Biafran" territory. eat regard for national or tribal boundaries. What appeared It was, in a sense, an oil war, having little resemblance to to be tribal rivalry- in. Nigeria actually' was a struggle for ,.?.: liberation struggles as they have come to be defined in , imperialist interests. numerous wars for national liberation fought throughout`''. .. _. ,: ?! it h t e world. l'? should be pointed out that the federal Nigerian government' At the beginning of the conflict, Biafra was supported was not responsible for the lbo massacres in 1966 nor did it by U.S., British, French and other oil interests. Without this ,'ever have any interest in lbo genocide, as the Western support, which implied future backing by respective West- ~: d ..:.r-_....r._ ,.t ..a admirers of Biafra have charged. The 1966 massacre was an of h e .vv `~?"".aumu, wnu n tia rc t finance the new state, it is hardly likely General Ojukwu ! r???'?-"~~ - ?. b.??~ . advantages over other peoples-the majority of the Nigerian and the Biafran comprador bour coisie he represented-a r r L a population. When the British left, bourgeois elements """ " ?" p "? it-h- among the Ibos dream d of dominating Nigeria in eolabora- out eerests-would ld have e contemplated d secession. . W Wit the cash payment by the oil monopolies and military and tion with the Western interests. The 1966 massacres, en? couragcd by regional feudal elements, should have warned economic aid from abroad, it is doubtful Biafra could have the Ibo l~adcrs of the dangers of making a bid for control. held out for more than a few weeks. In the final stages of But the ibo bourgeoisie, persisted in its bid for power, the war the "mercy" shipments of food only prolonged a :futile and. losing venture 'at the expense of millions.of ' ? concealing it behind the alleged threat of genocide. It would be naive to assume that the groundswell of in Biafra. ,.people The rhetoric of the Biafran 'struggle was independence ? i popular support in the West for Biafra was a completely but the reaiity would have been Biafra's subordination to .' '' spontaneous development. Although the campaign for Biaf. od iniperialislolp ' Ydkrt(itd~tR eIot aVevil0101WID4 ~:: ?I 'i P~'b- '6 ~1 O.t~'~'0~ 1~0 1 s who erful African state. Tiny Biafra would have been easier to. aB'C 11U erl- ",III w.s:lInialN POT STATINTL Approved For Release 2001/e44PM ??A-RDP80-01601 R00070 New 1s 0 CI ? , r A e L . for other agencies to dis-I' . shipments from the United States, Canada and Britain landed here today but them still was no word on when food Ivory Coast Gives Asylum To Ojukwu and medical supplies might be Prom News Dlsnatche5 flown to three former Biafran ABIDJAN, Ivory Coast, Jan. airstrips the government has 23-Gen. C. Odumegwu cleared for such cargos. Ojukwu, who fled Biafra be The airports at Port Har- fore Its capitulation to Ni- ,.court, Enugu and Calabar form geria Jan. 12, has been a triangle embracing most of granted political . asylum In the former secessionist terri- this West African country, a tory. The government yester. government communique an- day approved use of the air- ; nounced today. fields but ruled out. use of Uli His whereabouts had been a airport, last major lifeline to !mystery since he left ' Biafra Biafra before the civil war Jan. 10 on a plane that flew ended. 'him to the Portuguese island The first of three mobile has- of. Sao Tome off Nigeria. The pitals requested by Nigeria ar- announcement said Ojukwu is Lagos led. the tiny ,Biafran air force said tonight Ojukwu left Bia- fra voluntarily. Count Carl Gustav von Rosen added that as far as he knew the ' U.S. Central Intelligence Agenc "had nothing to do with" Ojukwu's air escape.] Nigeria' Reassures Rogers of Welcome Associated Press The Nigerian go~erriment has assured the, United States official in Lagos expressed that Secretary of State Wil- liam-P. Rogers will be a wel- ,come guest when he visits Liam C. Trueheart by an un- identified Nigerian official. It sharply contradicted an torial in the Lagos news welcome because of alleged antagonistic statements he made about Nigeria. "We had renewed assurances' that the secretary will be wel- come and that the Nigerian) government is looking for-1 regret that . the editorial had, appeared and assured us that!, it did not reflect government! policy." Rogers is due In Lagos Feb.! 19 for a 24-hour visit at ~ the' Nigerian capital during -his visers. Air Canada flew in 10 phouet-Boigny had said re-1Lagos next month. tons of drugs donated by the cently: "The Ivory Coast will The assurance, State CdI anaian Red Cross. never give asylum to a govern- ment'press officer Robert : J h C arter flights from Britain ment in exile. The Ivor Coast brought two heavy trucks and y several tons of medical sup- will never serve as a base for plies. (subversion to no matter whom Many doctors and nurses al- !against no, matter.. whom. This ready had left for the war-torn Ivery clear position permits east-central state and 15 more..:our country to receive any po- doctors and 13 nurses were due litical refugee who agrees to In Lagos Monday. !respect this rule. Officials continued to ex- "It Is by virtue of this sol- amine reports sent from Ower- , emn principle that we ac- ri in former Biafran territory corded the right of asylum to by correspondents flown there ; Gen, Ojukwu when he arrived .1 on an authorized visit earlier in the Ivory Coast. It is by vir- In the week. Officials' were tue of this solemn' principle known to be incensed at some that Gen, Ojukwu, although `reports they considered unbal-I entirely free In his move- , anced and with no menti f on o etill hlitil , :mas, wave no poca government relief efforts. activity In the Ivory Coast." Radio Nigeria exhorts war Ojukwu, 36, left the provi- refugees hourly to stay where ,stone) secessionist; capital of they are until relief supplies Owerri as the Biafran state, arrive, but workers say there set up May. 80, 4 196.7 was on .. .._ ..._ ! ...- are not nearly enough tru k c s bl t o get the juu uune . [Reports of victorious Nigerian troops raping nurses gained credence today when Brig. John Drewry, Canadian member of 'an International ,,observer team here, said some nurses "who have been raped are hiding In the bush afraid to' come out," a UPS dispatch' said. [In Geneva today, Joint Church Aid, the group barred thy Nigeria because it helped relieve Biafran suffering dur- ing the war, said it would with - draw Its aircraft from Sao Tome but. would leave tons of relief',, supp]ies etpef} ~j