SECRET MEMO SHOWS BUREAUCRACY IN CONFLICT OVER VIET WAR POLICY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-01601R000300170008-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 6, 2000
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 1, 1972
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-01601R000300170008-6.pdf146.45 KB
Body: 
WASHINGTON POST Approved For Release 2001/03/04 : PIA80-01601 R00 Secretllemo Shows Iii Cos flact Over Viet By Stanley Karnow P, Washington Post Staff Writer, Assign several govern. ment agencies to, survey Vietnam and, like the six blind men describing the el- ephant, they produce a re- port filled with conflicting observations. Give the re- pott to the President, and he largely ignores it as he shapes his policies. That is essentially the story of National Security Study Memorandum 1, a set of documents on Vietnam prepared by White House adviser Henry Kissinger's staff for Mr. Nixon soon after the President entered office in early 1969. The memorandum, com- posed of contributions from eight U.S. agencies, indi- cates that military and civil- ian officials directly ' en- gaged in war operations were inclined to be optimis- `tic about the current and fu- ture prospects in Vietnam while those primarily in- volved in analyzing the con- flict from afar took a more pessimistic view. Predictably, then, the hawkish "optimists" were the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Pacific command in Hono- lulu and the U.S. military and diplomatic missions in Saigon. The "pessimists," a more detached group, were the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Depart- ment's International Secu- rity Affairs office, and two State Department offices, Judging from his subse- quent actions, moreover, Mr. Nixon apparently disre- garded many of the assess- ments and recommendations contained in the memoran- dum, and instead initiated strategies based on a variety of other considerations. This suggests, as students of presidential behavior point out, that Mr. Nixon was and still is less con- cerned with Vietnam itself than with the effects of the war on domestic politics and international relationships. The President's decisions also stem from his efforts to balance. rivfll Washington bureaucracies, all of which are striving to assert their own interests. Evaluating the global im- portance of Vietnam, for ex- ample, contributors to the National Security Study Memorandum were sharply divided on whether there was any validity to various versions of the so-called "domino theory." The hawkish ' military agencies contended that an "unfavorable settlement" in Vietnam would prompt "swift" Communist take- overs elsewhere in Asia. The Washington intelligence community calculated,, in contrast, that a Communist victory in Vietnam might push Cambodia and Laos into Hanoi's orbit "at a fairly early stage" but "these developments would not necessarily unhinge the rest of Asia." Intelligence and Research Seeking Accommodations and the East Asia bureau. ' In April 1970, however, An ex-member of Ibis: ; Mr. Nixon- affirmed that ?ger's staff, who participated . "the forces of totalitarian- in compiling the documents, now explains that the?diver- gencies among the contrib- uting agencies were deliber- ately emphasized in order to dramatize to the President the extent to which percep- .-tions of the Vietnam situa- tion differed. Balance Bureaucracies ".We wanted to show'him how little anyone really knows about Vietnam," the ism and anarchy will threaten free nations and ureaucracy ar P- olicy and. elsewhere have been port said,' the Communists seeking accommodations had constructed' shelters with Communist China.'and early warning systems Some have also edged closer to protect themselves to North Vietnam. against "recurring patterns Thus new, international in B-52 strikes." alignments in Asia and n While asserting that the other parts of the worid bombing above the 17th par- seem to be evolving mainly allel had "adverse effects" for reasons unrelated to the on the North Vietnamese U.S. position in Vietnam. people by creating hard- The contributors to the ships, the Pentagon eontri- pearedandum generally ap- bution to the memorandum pcared unable to reach ei- nevertheless concluded that they firm or unanimous these difficulties had not re- conclusions on the effective- duced "to a. critical level" ness of B-52 strikes, called "harassment, interdiction Hanoi's "willingness or re- and strategic missions" in of- solve to continue the, con- ficial bureaucratic terminol- ogy. The Joint Chiefs esti- mated that the B-52 raids in- side South Vietnam during 1968 killed 41,250 Comtnu- nists, an average -of 2.5 enemy per sortie, wliile the Defense Department's office of International Security Af- fairs put the total figure for the period at 9,000, or 0.43 enemy killed per sortie. The CIA placed the average number of enemy killed by B-52s at 3.5 per sortie, but added that its evaluation methods were open to ques- tion. filet." Indeed, said the Pentagon report, the bombing "may have hardened the attitude of the people" in North Viet- nam, Conversely, the study pointed out, "there is some evidence ... indicating that morale and support for the war in North Vietnam has declined significantly since the bombing halt" in Nov- ember 1968. Ho Chi blink Trail Further questioning the value of the air operations, the Pentagon study esti- mated that the U.S. bomb- ings had destroyed about Protection Against Raids $770 million worth of enemy With all this, however, the installations while North agencies tended to be doubt- Vietnam received some $3 ful about the decisiveness of billion In military and cco- the B-52 attacks in either nomic aid principally halting or discouraging the .from the Soviet Union and North Vietnamese and the China. Therefore, the study Vietcong. said, North Vietnam is "bet. The State Department re- ter off today than it was in ported, for instance, that 1965." "there is little evidence to similarly, the Pentagaon contribution referred to U.S. lions "have that sucthe B-52 ce ceedded ed in min- In- bombings of the Ho Chi flicting - a scale of losses on blink Trail in Laos as "Im- the Vietcong and North \'i- pressive in its destruction of enemy supplies, but etnamese sufficient to Big- of that this "is not -ii a free institutions throughout nificantly disrupt tactical the world siiou1d the the United States act like "a pit- Coperations ommunists lto palter ethe iful helpless giant" in Indo- basic strategy for South china. The President reietr- Vietnam." ated that thesis last Wednes- day, saying that "the risks of war in other parts of the ment report added, nmorco. world would be enormously ver, that the effectiveness of increased" if the Commu-. the B-52 operations leve - nists "win militarily in Viet- ashes "as the enemy (level- nam,." ops tactics to adjust to their But despite these warn- destructive p o t e n t i a l . " y what counts." Said. the study: "The critical factor is the amount that reaches South Vietnam ... and since we have no control over imports to North Vietnam or inputs to Laos, it appears that the enemy can push sufficient supplies through Laos to STATINTL said. ,_ :Approved.. F..d"Rol 096- M 31 R000300170008-6