(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-01446R000100150006-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 29, 2000
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 27, 1952
Content Type: 
HW
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-01446R000100150006-5.pdf342.14 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/09/12 : CIA-RDP80-01446R000100150006-5 wa-ieot Approved For Release 2000/09/12 : CIA-RDP80-01446R000100150006-5 Approved For Release 20004R:1etWg80-01446ROOQA5 3EORET October 23, 1952 ? Rorace S. Craig FROM; John Flliott SUBJECTI Talk with Charles F. ("Chip") Bohlen d a talk last night with Charles F. ("Chip") Bohlen, Counsellor tate Department, on the subject of the latest developments in et Russian policy. Mr. Bohlen thought that Stalin's article on political and economic affairs printed in the magasine."Bolshevie on the eve Of the recent meeting of the nineteenth congress of the Soviet Communist Party heralded a striking and arresting change in the Kremlin's strategy. The Soviet objectiveness remains now as before the same?world demination?according to Mr. Bohlen?and the danger ,of war is as great as it ever was?but Soviet tactics have changed once more as they have many times in the past and as they are apt to do many times in the future. What is currently happening is that the masters of the Kremlin are reverting to the "popular front" methods. This course of action will doubtless be on a less formal basis than was the case in 1935 since the Communists no longer enjoy the confidence of the European Socialists that made possible the Leon Blum cabinet in France in 1936-1947 and the alliance that victoriously swept the Spanish elections early in 1936. The new change of front, calling for cooperation with the bourgeois on certain issues such as the "peace crusade", marks the third shift in Soviet policy :duce 1945. At the end of World War II, the Kremlin ordered the European Communists to cooperate with bourgeois parties and they did enter into ministerial coalitions in France and Italy and worked with the Social Democrats on an "anti-Fascist" basis in Germany. Bat this policy changed abruptly in 1947 with the introduction of the Marshall Plan. The Communist parties were ordered to embark on An outright policy of hostility to the existing order in democratic coun- tries and the Cominform arose as Moscow's reply to Europe Economic Cooperation. roved For Release 2000/0MO-RDP80-01446R000100150006-5 SECURITY INFORMATION Approved For Release 2000/09/12 80-01446R000100150006-5 The failure of the general itriki in the fiasco of the Ridgway demonstration in have convinced fb/COW apparently that the hs Resent developments in Europe have disclosed and ,/above all, night af Ney 28 d again. ttern of Soviet diploma:. They include such events* for instanne as (1) the Kremlin's courting of Pietro Nenni, Italian left-wing Socialist leaders and the cent erring on him of the Stalin Peace Prise in order to win him over to cooperate elth the Italian Communistr 7q1',1 ??.arliamentary elections; (2) the purge of Andre Marty and Cherie-4' Xliion 'tom the high posts they occupied in the French Communist part.--- ;m7race inflicted on them by direct orders, from Ptecov--because thr:: r.,:r,TInt,(1 a policy of direct action as opposed to the more subtle and crefty r.,111.7 of cooperation with bourgeois elements favored by Maurice ?bores and Jacquee Duclos; (3) the Stalin article and speeches delivered before the nineteenth nest= of the Soviet Communist Party in which the emphasis was laid on future conflicts between capitaliat nations instesd of a war between Soviet Russia and democratic countries. Other recent developments which Ht. lohlen thought also pointed in the direction Imre (I) the appointment of a high-ranking man as ilndrei A. myto to become Soviet Ambassador to London which has been interpreted as to WNW Great Britain away from the United Staten and the reported tl,on t1,1 7,Jttnferm. AIL1 the developments clearly. point in one direction, s $ti now is, above all, to break up the Orand Alliance solate the United State' by working on the hopes Italy, and Western Germany and so detaching them a policy is the classic /ne f "divide and role and he the cepitalistic nations an themselves and in this wily wiett?assiass conquest of the world. held that in this crisis a grtat paychological effort forth br the United States for the purpose or maintaining e of the democratic nations. He thought that to accomp- e attention in the future should be paid to prepeganda de our allies as our target. the past, he felt, United States propaganda aimed at the Soviet tendency to be too strident and shrill. The reeult of these e believed, had been to alarm our allies more than to intimi- lin. These sharp attacks on the Soviet n, Mr fi1snteen te reinforce the incipient impression bnting in the minds of the peopiee of the democratic vorld that the United tee was a warmonge tion, trying to incite hostilities with the Soviet Union. This was an image of the United States that Soviet propaganda was sedulously trying to create in the democratic world and some of our past propaganda had aided them. SECURITY INFORMATION Approved For Release 2000/09/12.: CIA-RDP80-01446R000100150006-5 SECURITY INFORMATION Approve, For Release 2000/09/12e04-epP80-01446R000100150006-5 -- uLtiniLi Ate an emaxple of the sort of thing he had in mind, Mt. Bohlen d propaganda barrage released in connection with the investigation e Katyn massacree. He felt that this propaganda had back-fired and, ndeed, mey perhaps have been responsible for the launching of the Com- munist bacteriological warfare charges against the United States in reprisal hien how he interpreted the recent constitutional the nineteenth Soviet Congress. Hs expressed the created Presidium, presumed to be instituted to Politburo, was only eye-wash. It was too big and Lly supreme governing body. On the other hand, the ladcd only three members of the old Politburo seemed to be too inSienificant. What the change signified, Mr. Bohlen was inclined to believe,was the virtual disappearance of the Soviet Communist Party as a govering body and its merger with the State. Some organ of the soviet State is probably the real source of goverronental authority in the USSR today* This change had been going on over many years and had now been consummated. Mito Bohlen also questioned the current newspaper assumption that Georgi H. Malenkov was now the gCrown Prince because he had been selected to deliver the report of the Central Committee to the Communist Party Con gress--an aseignment in post years discharged by Stalin. Since the Soviet Premier VAS not delivering this report himself in 1952, this duty fell em- officio on Malenkov by virtue of the fact that he is general secretary of the party. When Stalin dies, Mr. Bohlen thinks, it will be found that he has left behind a solemn will and testament, naming the triumvirate of VYacheslav M. Molotov, Malenkov and Lavrenti P. Beria as his successors. ch view that the replace the A clumsy to be Secretariat v gc Dietribution: Orig. - Dr Craig 20 - Mr. E. L. Taylor" 3, - Mallory Browne 4, JElliott chrono 5. - JElliott subject Approved For Release 2008581 TY linS1380-01446R000100150006-5 ma.