INSPECTION OF THE OFFICE OF NATIONAL ESTIMATES AND THE ESTIMATIVE PROCESS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
70
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 13, 2006
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 19, 1962
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6.pdf4.87 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A0001'00020012-6 *Or SECRET 19 Septedber 1962 MEMORANDUM FOR: Acting Directorof Central Intelligence SUBJECT ? inspection of the Office of National Estimates and the Estimative Process 1. The objectives of the ONE inspection we. (a determine the views of the intelligence community on the quality and. usefulness of national intelligence estimates, and (b) to appraise the efficiency of the estimative process and the Office of National Estimates. 2. The inspection team was not qualified to weigh sub- stantive conflicts revealed during U3IB drafting and coordination of specific estimates. Many ONE participants in estimating cited examples of apparent deficiencies in estimating as, for example, foreseeing the impact of the Communist Chinese Agricultural crisis,: or assessing the operational capabilities of the Royal Laotian Army. However, the inspection team heard no proposals for modification of the existing authority and structure of the estimative system. The inspectors concluded that a national intelligence estimate undergoes as widespread, continuous and intense an evaluation as any other document produced in the 14URVCDF intelligence community. Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET al estimates are receLvi ning and policy-rielOng Is is Shawn in the attac eful coneiderati s of the znoranda covering discussions with Mr. Walt W. Rostaw, Counsellor and Chief, Policy Planning Council Department of State, and Mr. William P. Bundy Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs. Equivalent testimony was obtained from spokesmen in the offices of General Maxwell D. Taylor, Military Advisor to the President, and Mr. McGeorge Bundy, Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. I. These sources were consistent in their praise of the current estimative product dealing with the Soviet Union-- particularly that on military subjects?and with alternative courses of action in various contingency situations, Less interest was expressed in the scheduled estimates an specific countries, but there was general agreement that these estimates had improved in usefulness by evolution from their earlier encylopedio approach toward better focussed analyses of key issues. 5. The inspectors principal findings are summarized in the following paragraphs. In general, this survey proposes measures In our opinion would tend to increase the flexibility of O and. MIS management within existing patterns of operation. - 2 - T Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 _DAM Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 6.The of National SIIICRET ?minces of the indi members of the Board /mates vary in quality dJpeDdtnS on the experience of the indiv5.dual in intelligence analysis and writing and on his aptitude for the estimating ;raceme. this fact in no way discounts the quality of his previous accomplishments in other fields. The survey recommends that there, be a continuing effort to upgrade the quality of Board meMber performance by establishing a tine 34prit to the initial assignment of new members. Similarly merbers of outstanding talent acquire seniority, attention must be given to aebbatical assignments. TheNit/setae etaff es staff of ONE has yet to determine whether 7. The the (dented drafter of estimates Should work on a career evening attitude of the otaff is to reject reassignment the DOI area unless this involves clear advancement. /be DWI is now moving to promote a freer flow of senior personnel among his offices. This survey recommends measureS in support of ONE career planning The Princeton Panel of Consultants 8. The use of a panel of outside specialists frequently at Princeton University to provide an on the adequacy of estimates vas an Obvious need and safeguard al check S 11-1 fje Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET dgr1n the early years of the present estimative process. With the growing professionalism of the ass performance,. review of by a panel of outside consultants has lost its vitality in the ss13y unanimous opinion of the ONE atitee Staff. The D)/NL however, eontinues to see utility in the panel sessions both as a check for fresh views and to promote a heat thy relation- ship between intelligence and academie communities. The p?eaant survey recommenda that the needs of the Estimates Staff be governiag in this area. The present panel approach to nsultng should be discontinued as a regular practice in favor of more individual contacts with a greater variety of cleared specialists of agreed interest to tatinmtes Staff personnel. ONE Contact with Policy Mere 9* tXhere is too little contact at present between ONE pema3nel and nt policy planners. This stems in large doctrine of separation of intelligence were and users. The inspeotore concluded that the profea- sionaliaz of dAy estimators insures ageinst the :du% of 1isan involvements. The estinstors need more guidance from policy ere an the context of estimating problems. The survey recommends regular face-to-face discussions at the start of each estimative effort between OMR representatives and senior 13-42 -c B T Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release2006/10/13 : CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET policy making personnel. Notes from these &lscussionia should be included in the terns of reference for each estimate. USIB Contribution to the Estimeive Process. 10 The The USIB organizations contributing to estimating were described in CIA as a loose confederation in which each participant decides what resources he can commit to the estimating effort. Present contributions are widely uneven in quality, and some participants are not substantively qualified. The inspectors have proposed that the USIB undertake periodic assessments of the performance and program commitments of the participating agencies and recommend standards of staffing and levels of research effort. U. Specialized USIB committees; such as the Scientific Intelligence Committee; have explicit responsibilities in their DCI'D charters for contributing to national estimates. The coordinating and publishing procedures emp oyed by the Scientific Intelligence Committee are not consistent with those of the Board of National Estimates. The inspectors have recommended that the Assistant to the DCI for Coordination be charged with investigating through the US1B and recommending action to meet this problem. 12. The inspectors suggest that the senior command of CIA stimulate reaction to the estimates by direct dissemination to -5 - Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 BECTIBT appropriate consumers, e.g., an Assistant Secretary for African Affairs at the Department of State in the case of an estimate on an African subject. Such dissemination should be accompanied by correspondence requesting comment on leading issues. Attachments / J. 5.Earman J. S. larman Inspector General 6 - Ii-E-C-rift Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 $ECR ET $132111ANDUX PM THE RECORD SUBJECT Discussion of national est prooess with W. Walt W. State, 16 August 1962 August 1962 the estimating rtment of EVROA who handles coordination of eetisting for thetepartment arranped for us to see Mr.Bosto in connection with the inspection of the estimating system now in progress in the Agency. Mr. Rostow very generously gave us more than an hour of his time and cormented freely on many aspects; of the objectives and contributions of estimates to the national security. 2. Or first question to Mr ? oatow was whether he reads the estimates himself. Ee answered promptly that he reads them He added that he finds them to be of high quality in organization, clarity, management of background information, and in soundness of the judgpents presented. (This reeponae paralleled an earlier statement from W. Parrot of General Taylor's office that General Teylor while at the White ROJA0 also read all of the estimates.) W. Rcetow also believes that the estimates on specific areas and subjects are read in the Department by the appropriate operating officials. At a later point be dhserved however, that operating officials probably still make most of their decisions without close utilization of formal estimates). He doubted further that these officials employ personal staff to provide them withsmything approximating professional intelligence suPPort. 3. Mr. Rostov then spent approximately fifteen niutes developing what he sees as two critical areas of weakness or Challenge to effectiveness of performance by the present-day U.S. estimating system. The first of these was a speculation whether the estimating system is not prone today to a too even treatment of all of the facets of the given target country under estimative analysis. He thought that the effect of this tendency would be a failure to isolate and highlight areas of impending critical DocuMENT NO CHANGE,' IN 017A-ST QECLASSIFIED cHANGi- 0: TS S C 0-2 T RE-ME-WEI Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECR 1:T 4. His second point was perhaps more speculative and con- cerned the capability of the estimating apparatus to fuse its findings on each segment of a target country?economic, political, scientific--into 04 effective appreciation of bow these perts interact to produce events and trends of strategic significance, 5. W. Rostov cited the estimating problems facing the .kited. States in dealing with Communist China in his discussion of each of the above points. Se returned repeatedly to the prdblaa of estimating the appearance and effects of the Chinese agricultural crisis and its far-readdag implicatioes for other parts of the Chinese economy, defense system and current political posture. 6. Questions on the adequacy of intelligence research in support of estimating brought forth several interesting observa- tions. Other observers with whom we bad. talked had expressed the opinion that there are important gaps in intelligence research today including, for example, economic research in free world areas, analysis of defense systems, and appreciation of political problems in Africa. W. Rostov cemented that there is a wealth of good. background intelligence analysis being produced today and that he depends on it in geingbehind the estimates into critical problem areas. Se recalled a conversation with AU associate from the joint Chiefs of Staff in which he speculated that 75% of intel-ligence is wasted in terms of utilization by operating officiale amd the friend felt that 90% was a more realistic figure. Se expressed little fear of duplication of Analytic effort and seemed to feel that an intel- ligence organization that senses a deficiency in analysis should move in and try its band at the problem. Se suggested that there is a basic vsakness in the present U.S* system of collection of intelligence. Diplomatic representatives are schooled in the collection techniques evolved in the advanced Western countries. In African eountries association with that might be called the standard diplomatic circles is quite inadequate as a means of appreciating the forces of change in tribal, labor and political groupings. 7. Mr. Rcetow had many ideas for dealing with the problems of estimating. Se spoke of his own efforts to build up the policy planning apparatus of the Departnent and the executive branch of R Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET the Oov&rnment but did not o into detail on speoifio iaeurea. Nearee4 that there is a distinct need for close qoication between pL era and estimators and paid that he would welcome a two.way excbanse of staff between Ur* Policy Planning Council and the Board and Staff of O. 8. Re was particularly interested in increaatn cozunica between estimators and operating off iciale.. Preeent roce setting terms of reference for national e d be modified to include early face-to-face discussions between operators who retest estimates and ONE estimators to explore iseues and agree on research and estimating judgments most likely to be of eisnificance to the operators. Re thought it might be useful to append the notes of such discussions to the formal terms of reference. 9. W. Rostov spoke of his own visits to Ong to sot acuaintd withONE pereonnel and the estimatiag system. Be felt that it is 'very important that room be maintaimtd on the Board of Nationel Estimates for several members who would be qaite unorthodox in background and outlook and who would help thereby to introduce reel/ challenges to Board thinking, (Nis own suggestions on Board member- a-hip in the future would be of interest.) 10. On the subject of evaluation of the esti.ating performance Scetow again emphasized the need for fresh views and suggested that validity studies should be undc7taken by outside professors wbo? might spend a summer in ONE examining the preparation, quality, and impact of a series of estimates on a particular prOblem. U. Late in the meeting Nts. Rostov referred to 4 forthcoming book on Pearl Harbor of which be had an advance copy. (CIA Library located a copy on friday and will notify the Deputy isspector General when it is received.) A paragraph in the preface of this book discusses the problem of systems coping with surprises. Mr. Roetow said he had read the pertinent passages to his own staff And proceeded to have the book retrieved from a colleague and to read them to us. This resume by no means doee justice to the freshness of Mr. Rostow's thinking and conversation. It would be most appropriate to invite htm to set down his ideas on. estimating problems for pthlication in Studio in nt011iaenCe. Director Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 8 E C B: T 6 Septeether 1962 of enrrea eettes is now a bigger customer of e saw estimates have a definite impact and. influeece on decisions. All Soviet estimates are read with great interest by the highest levels at the Department of Defense, and the moo important ingxedients of these estimates are highlighted for the Secretary of Defense. Mr. Bundy referred to contingency papers as being "top-use item" by his office. 2. Aside fres eseuring closer contact between eatimatora and policy plahners, Mk.. Bundy had no suggeatione for 1mprovessen4 of the estimating Prooese. Sa considers the estimatee to be well written and well organized, and, if there is any fault with the system, it lies with the frmming of the rowatioae. 3. XV. Bendy remarked that the Survey of NIS Dissemination and Use completed in 1956 was a useful exercise and would be worth repeating to stlemlate a wider use of estimatee. 4. w. Mundy-evuld welcome the detail of altimeters to his offic. for a tour of duty as well as the opportunity to detail of his people to le our diacuesien on the Bd of National Retleates, commented that each military service at one time or au outstanding representative eft the Board. It is o judge beforehand whether a particular military succeed as a Beard =Aber. The solution might be military man for a specific wind, of time, saject If his performaaoe VOTe uotevorthy, be could then DOCUMENT NO. NO CHANGE IN CLA- ?LAC);;C:CAI,ST-ASZ;n TO: TS C V DATE: a 70-2 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-0C948M001000200124En. 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 V re. Be was , a Farsisa Qin* COI offi appoimtment of a waste of talent for to continue writing estimates Ward. Be said that he often t Board, and he relied that did so. 7. A4 rrs careers for OMB staff personnel, be believed that these psople should be rotated through other D1)/3 components and, on occasion, serve in the DP/P. Sxceptions should be rAde for those talented estimators who prefer to spend their entire Agency career in estimating. Mhscutive Director Mir C-11 "-T? Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 MD DOCUMENT NO. - NO CHANGE IN CLASS. El DECLASSIFIED ASS. CHANGED TO; TS S r 1-3EVIEW DATE: /JIM H DAT VIEWER 2ot o COW A 1 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET TABLE op' commus A* E. SCOPE ? a 4 ? 4 ? ? * * ? 4 ? * ? ? ? nis =we= mum . ? * a a ft * a ? a ? ? At ? ? 1. . 5 Components . . ..... . to ? ? ? ? ? It ? 6 Estimating Pr edures . .. ... ? ? ? . ? ? ? . 10 C. OPERATING Imps AND PROBLEMS . . ? . .. ... 12 General ? ? ? ? 4 * 4 ? ? ? . ? . . ? 12 Staffing PdlicY. - . . . . a a 11? ? 17 The Board of National Estimate; . . . . . . * a ? ? a 29 Consultants .... . .. . ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 4 It 36 Miscellaneous Problems . . 4- ft . 4. it .4 ? ilt ? lir 4 4, 1 39 Administration, Support and Space , , . , Weekly Survey of Cold War Crisis Situations . . 39 and Regional Surveys . . . . . . . . . . . . ? 41 Priority National intelligence Objectives . . . 44 Poet Mdrtems and Validity Studipn ? 45 e A 1 . . 47 xmg tne use or Eatimatas . . . . . . . . . 49 ONE Guidance on ORR and OSI Research Programs . 49 Estimating Relationships between ONE and the USIB Agencies ... . .. . . ? a ? 0 4 DD/P ONE Relations ? ? 50 ra a 54 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 happens to a government, is bureau.cratic ot responsibility, but y so poorly defined or so asibiguously action gets lost. It includes gaps in also intelligence that, like a string of pearla too precious to wear, is too sensitive to bo need it. It includes the alarm that k but also the alarm that has gone off so disconnected. It includes the unalert the one who knave he'll be chewed out he gets higher enthority out of bed. contingencies that occur to no one, but eryone assumes somebo4 else is taking care of straightforward procrastination, but also decisions protracted by internal disagreement. It includes, in addition, the inability of individual human beings to rise to the occasion until they are ware it is the occasion--which is usually too late." Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 11W B Z C R E A. SCOPE 1. The production of national inteUigene estimates as a coordinated effort of the United States intelligence ccmmunity ham been under way since the establithment of the Office of Rational Estimates (ONE) in the Fall of 1950. The structure fOrmate and the principal procedures in estimating have shown subetantial continuity down to the present time. At its present stege of evolution the estimating process constitutes a remarkably small eveluetive effort at the apex of the broad collection and analytical efforts of the intelligence community. A guiding doctrine in the shaping of the system to date has been the separation of estimating from policy in order to assure the preeentation by the intelligence community of unbiased core mp hensive judgments to the policy makers. In this climate few zerticipants in the estimating system will hazard a, guess as to the influence of estimates on policy declaims. 2. The critical nature of the estimating function has made the system the object of relatively frequent top-level Government review and evaluation. The /Waver Commission Report of 28 December 1948 and the Dulles-Jackson-Correa COmmittee Report of 1 January 1949 examined the subject in detail and laid. much of the groundwork for the establishment of the Office of National Estimates. The Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRNT tnspector General conducted a "Survey of the Office of National Betimates" in April of 1954. A Task Force on /ntelligence Astivitiss under General Nark Clark isaued a report in Nay 1955 dealing at length with estimating. Background material in the Clark Coelattee files dealt with most of the key issues brought to our attention during the current falspection. 3. Another medium for more general discussions of the poses and problems of national estimating haa been the eearterly Studies in *anima now in its sixth year. Many meMbers of OM of the Board of National Ettimates, and of other eomponents of the intelligence community have contributed firsthand accounts and judgments .zn. important aspetts of the, sUbject, 4. 7ins'iiy, in the past 12 eonthe the joint Study Group on the Frei ga letelligence Activities of the United States Government and. the present Director's Ad Noe Conmittee on Organisational Natters both chaired by Mr. Lyman B. Kirkpatrick have completed studies with implications for the estimating process. These were explored orally by the inspectors with W. Kirkpatrick, 5. A three-man team from the Inspector Geneeells staff spent the months of July and August 1962 reviewing primarily the orgenizetioe01. and management aspects of the national estimatiug process. The Approved For For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET bulk of the 0 was concerned with the Office of National Batimatea which provides most of the apparatus and the day-to-day coordieation of the community's effort in national estimating. Discusaions were held with all meebere of ONE tuvi the Board of National Estimates, with maw other senior officials of C/A and with selected, contributors and users of estimates in the Government. 6. An Aemney inspection of this intelligence community system necessarily stopped. short of a detailed examination and comparison among the United States Intelligence Board (USIB) member oreenizationa of their levels of efforts quality of performance, and standards of manegmaant. Sech review would be essential to a occedinated USIB effort to appraise and improve the estimating protess. The USIB community approach to estimating was freqpently characterized to us by its participants as a loose federated cysts= of very uneven qgality and performance. The US/B does not maintain a formal management group to analyze and propose soletions to non-substantive community problems, for example, in estimating. in the peat the excellence of the example set by the sr estimators appears to have been the principal stimulus to loved commuaity performance. 3 ji"E'f7RAI Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 7. This SECRET of the estimating prate a vou1, 143t be complete vithout xuntjoi of the continued presenee at the helm he Office of Ma tonal Estimates of Sherman Kant, who has prdbably made the Jar t individual contribution to the present highly respected statuxe of his office. We encountered a wide range of warm pe Atonal tributes to NV. Kent. Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release2006/10/13 : CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Atow SECRET d. OFFICE OF NATIONAL ESTIMATES (1) MISSION. The Assistant Director for National Estimates Is charged with the production of notional intelligence estimates. FuscrIoNs. The Assistant Director for National Estimates shall: Direct the production of national intelligence estimates. This includes the setting of priorities and the assignment of production responsibilities among the components of the Central Intelligence Agency, and among the intelligence Agencies of the Federal Government. Prepare national intelligence estimates for issuance by the Director of Central Intelligence. Sit as Chairman of the Board of National Estimates. Provide CIA representation and intelligence sport at the Staff Assistants level of the National Security Council Staff. (f) Give appropriate guidance to the intelligence research agencies. (g) Give appropriate guidance to the intelligence collection agencies. KES1CF';-E Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 8. SECR 1 T Directive (DC and 5 whiob establish under the United the Joint Atozic Energy Intelligence Committeei AIM)/ the Oui4e Missile end Astrceisutics Intelligence Committee (ONK1C), and the Scientific Intelligente Committee (SIC) incorporate a stard paragraph providing for the participation of these Committees in national estimating. The inspectors encountered no concrete proposals for the modification of then* direetivee. 9. Within CIA the Office of National 3st1mates iie a s designated amponent of the Deputy Directorate for Intelligencep and Hogulationr---lpecifiee that the Deputy Director ) (DD/I) is "responsible for directing And the activities of the Office of. .tit.National ." The relationship between DD/X and Assistant Director /mates (AD/N2) has varied with the incumbents psrt on the relation desired by the Director of with his AD/NE. The is an evident need for spin the DD/X f3.3.r and promptly informed on the programming of SYSTEM productien of natjj, n National Secur C Director of I and 4 and ecord Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 10. of d time of 12 *era eels on indefinite temre to vet/lance to the natioz been selected for their NET the LD/X clearly will need to oversee his staff in ONE and in other DOI ecocjijatiei or full identification of wean hineelf and the Board of National tywoblems. Convege#fiL law% Effittmktea bee the Director of Centul ntellivence both sulketentive and procedural imating process. Present members hee Wan or military experience in academic etittoulr or intelligence pursuits. Ito Board is thoroughli integrated into the ONE structure but its members are freed of all administrative duties. The AD/NE- Is Board Chairmen there is a deputy chairmen, and the Deputy Assiatent Director f onal Estimates (DAD/NE), who- is responsible- for the administration of the- Office, is also a nether of the Board. U. The Board's existence rests on the authority rhere is no eognizseee of its existence and reactionsin the - ives of the National Security Council. DCID 1/1. spells out 6 213.-elfitThr Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 BBC i T Board ftcticn in setting terrn of referencein final presentation to the IflL. d wee an integral IL of the national e timatingprocess. comPcsition and purpose were visualized, ver, as an assemblage of independent authorities of the highest national reputation, acting in a corporate capacity, to develop the stbatantive produt of the estimating effort. This concept has been substantially modified through time with the growing profess onalism of the Istimetes Staff. The Board enjoys the services of many gifted individuals, but the demands of coordination have restricted their contributions in the strictly creative sense of conceiving estimates and highlighted their skills in criticism and negotiation. 13. A secon4 feature of the eNvaution of Board functions has been the sharp reduction in the functioning of the floardes eorporate body In coordinating estismtes. The given estimating project is today steered through the system by a panel of two or three Board mothers, one of whims is designated chairman with wide 'Muds to impress his personal views of coordinating procedure on the community effort. 2fficionqy in coordination has risen through the years end the pedal approach with the use of strong ark on estimates, ting estimates for or early years its - - Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET Chairman has enabled. the Board to handle * larger volume of business without community complaint concerning the ob4eativityen fairness of the process. Questions concerning the selectionA career nenegpmento and alternative uses of Board talents are discuseed in detail in Section C of the eurvey. 14. imq piptUpass parr is s group of iteUtnce officers maintained in ORR to perform the final drafting of national estimates. nose men are responsible first of all for keeping themselves comprehensively informed on the areas or sUbjects for which they have assigned responeibility. Their effectiveness at drafting derives from personal commend of a alibJect field and tram utilisation of the estimative contributions from the intelligence communit . Their product may in tura undergo substantial modification at the bends of members of the Board of Malone' actimates and during the interagency coordination of the draft prior to its submission to the usu. The growing =potence of the OBE staff boss been a notable feature of the evolution of to date and has oontributed to a relatively autonomoue status for the staff vie a vie the Board it OW. 15. The measure of s staff man is his ability to wish events and trends tm the given area or subject field, to make perceptive judgments of their significance for intelligence and 8 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 ECR3T caiarni.cate these ideas effec variedorally or in writinS to the ranks of Government officials. Jectivity of analysts is of the essence both in the preparation of a draft estimate, a commissioned memorandum or a self-initiated appreciation of a foreiga situation, and in its defense before the Boerd of National 4stimates? and sUbseseently in the market place of the intelligenee and policy emagemity. The characteristic influence of such experience on the individeel cannot yet be fully appraised, but there is an evident premium on initiative and. forcefulnesa. There is a distinct pall on the most aptly suited individuals to move from this arena of evaluation into positions of =amend both in crA and elsewhere in the Government. 16. The_SuRport Staff provides for the administrative needs of both the Board of National Sat/mete* and the Metleates Staff. se activities include maintmnance of an Information Control t reading Pini reference rooms, a atlicatione and Reproduction unit, and research, secretarial and clerical services. There is a sUbstantial volume of pUbliehing and dissemination of revised drafts of estimates, much of it occurring outside regular vorkinS hours. The skills and dedication of the staff were eidely commended by ON3is professional members. 9 a-R-17T Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET 17. The etimative product may &mending on nature and urgeney ke any one of nany the problem being ith by the policy 'salters of the Government. The majority of e papers are oommdssioned by the DCI, the Mite Nouse taft, the policy planning ns lam of the Department of State, olicy task forces, the joint Chiefs of Staff and other rUitary authorities. There is a substantial demand for stitivememoranda by the DCI and the USIB and, final4 of self-initiated GBH staff and Board memoranda. henne1s forat in estimates are informal and vary from between outside re questers and webers of OM to asninta delivered either directly from the DCI or via the /I. 18. The USIB or the DCI on its behalf awt apprOve the ached ins of a national estimate. The USIB approveseach quarter a program of national intelligence estimates for the succeeding six months which is prepared by the Board of National 1etinateeThe next step is the preparation of for the 'mate which define the subject to be covered, and pose the quest one to be answered. The terms of reference drafted in OWS and eUbmitted to the USIB agencies for revise. ftpre- tstivos Ueignated by the UDIS aaeneies to coordinate the - 10 - Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SEC113 T ibility Ibut ar delivered to tbe Betimates etiritea teas cnsieation. The dtatin8 of estimates is b d lar the rGrGtive of ORBami is the source of sometenton on the art of tributors to eetirntea in other agencies. The problem a to a cohesive estimate written in =effective styae. uch on uazat oce in the last analysis, as the performance f one tn4iiri&i*i It yes fras the individual drafter of pertinent tion bdm ability to focus ai sential problemai and his skill presenting then lucitly en4 conviacingly. The authors of ntrtbutton fran the otherageneies inevitably tend to Uen8e the. style, if not the judgments, in the final druft UI to 5ti: the 4iseard of their ovn conscientious and ds to draft the est of referenees nrv to production of one from all sources. and & designated to for Board Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 WO' 2sena. ettarta ak of osastinent mons the participants far radicai change in the basic foetuses o the grates. There sr* a =dew help to sec for this stability. One of the et i,oa?tazrt is that Oat las Wen able to attnert hiIoclibefr 4th the wrking stensphere. Mt is it offers both the freelloss se* the perfornance by perceptive partindpent to relex in costrortehle 3IY imtriglged., to prove a relatively A responsible? for the areas eat constructim and sty Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 at Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 A is handl 1 facto and background garded as immorally setts. Its en the Ixthereert limitations h in more dotal belov. litzt xpressims of renact and 92 A te record. or etthetentive eeoculaishment Particular satisfaction esivressed 'with the demsnstftted asipadaur or Olit end the ZOVI in deueral to he *e so veil as coordinate the tive judgments on, military subjectsies sometime* involvia* that the ailitery had failed to analysis or coordinate ly themeelme* Zedependent civilian analysis or p.Obleme wee considoriktlar et least onothe st observer significant current contributtm oft* yst to the notional security* kleuVr intiviftal*4 the i*zs always an Intangible one as to concrete e, thet the ci,trcommitments otithe othertheir WU estimative judgawntscat ea2*nc . *Wow* the objectivity mad usefulness of 11J U*djjOb3 produgted tor CIA. 0 '-'111-C?rt Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13 : CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 .reiW 114Prease4 Win billow Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 C I It 1! COPpersci orb present biii ey tins pm:some' in the black or vats and such be inceof late. The dame tea regular ? 3.5 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 of use livelY ambling* 4)f ee protossionel moottlignoers ttOfl to the sUbstentive questions et investments in the research d 'trees of responsibility vorld, geo.4poli+4cal military werPons cm ettieb, community OW. %commendations of Us survey. Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 S 3 C Po:Li. 28. We interviewed all profeseional and clerical personnel on the ONE staffs. The staffs currently havorThro personnel on board out of a Tb 0 of. Without exception were favorably impressed with the dedication, intelligence, and intellectual curiosity of each of theOprofessional officers we interviewed. It is significant to note that each of these officers admires and respects all of his staff colleagues, both professionally and personally. Morale except for the oVererowded working conditions, is excellent throughout the staffs. 29. Each nember of the Board oflational Estimates (UE) rates staff personnel as high-auslity and outstanding. The reputation of the staffs is also high with other CP ocmcnents as well as with outside departments and agencies. 30. The backgrounds, experience, and intereeta of staff personnel are to a large extent, remarkably similar. Almost every e did undergraduate ne/or graduate work in a social science at one of the better known universities. Many have had teaching experience, and there seems to be a continuing desire to write for academic journals. Interest in an academic career has never completely waned, and currant job satisfaction is attributable in no small measure to the academie and intellectual atmosphere pervading ONE. A large number of staff personnel Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET served in OCI and/or ORR and a few in the Deputy Director (Plans), /P) before coming to ONE. The other staff personnel were recruited directly from the universities. All employees inter- viewed felt that the blending of Agency and university people is an ideal arrangement for ONE. 31. Despite the fact that the miteffs are only three under professional strength, ONE has had considerable difficulty in its recruitment efforts. At the univervities, ONE has encountered stiff competition from the academic community, business world, and other Government agenciea. Since OM has had only limited success in university recruitumnt, it would seem that most of its people in the future will again have to be recruited from other CIA. comPo- nents. Many able employees in other CIA components aspire to work in ONE but their supervisors are naturally reluctant to lose these good people, particularly since they too have serious recruit- ment problems. To avoid animosity and friction with these compo nents, OXE should begin to develop a program wherein the careers of its employees should include rotational tours in attractive positions in other parts of the DD/I as well as in the DD/P. At the same time other components should seriously consider and plan for the assignment of promising talent to ONE for a tour of duty. These components would be more willing to release people to ONE if -18 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 CRET they were assured of getting ONE people on occasion for a specific tour of duty. (See Recommendation Ro. 1) 32. ONE staff personnel today expretia little interest in work- ing elsewhere in the EIDA area. This attitude is at least sympto- matic of a condition of overcoapartaentation in the DO Offices. These ONE personnel now view the other DWI Offices as offering only routine assignments and limited headiroomfbr advancement. Sharper delineation of a ED/I career service with assurances of opportunity to we with mere freedom through mere areas of DD/I operations should tend to remove the present scuewhat parochial attitude. At stake for the IINNJA is the cultivation of a corps of officers who appreciate eutimating in relation to other DIVI programming prob- lem* who bring versatility to their assignments, and who regard the entire DIVI as an exciting place in which to 'work. 33 ogS has had a large turnover of staff personnel over the years. At the tine of the 1954 IG Survey, there were 29 officers serving on the ONE staffs. Six remain today, of whom four are serving in supervisory or specialized capacities. There is an un- written philosophy in the office that personnel either go up or out, and we believe that this is a mound philosophy. When we **insider that the national intelligence estimate is one of the moat important studies produced in the United States Government, -19- 0-1r04-4"1" Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SICRICT it is Obvious that ONE must be stared with t people. The caliber of the pre and when an estimator dernontrates outstanding talent and. interest in this type of work, a career service would preebly take these factors into account in career planning. 34 it is generally recognized that four to five years of estimating for it people should be followed by a change of scenery to permit the development of fresh approacheu and nay as and to prevent stagnation. A periodic change of scenery would be rewarding if it involved rotation to another stimulating assignment, a sabbatical at a university, or an overseas tour. An overseas tour, wherein be would acquire area twkaround and experience, would be refreshing and invaluable to the individual as well an to the Agency. The individual would return to ONE with added knowledge and expertise, and his overseas performance may serve to eliminate some of the barriers and prejudices that exist between DD/I and DD/P personnel. We are not suggesting that the DD/P fill classical clandestine positions overseas with ONE personnel, although we believe that some of them could serve with distinction in such positions. Nowever, do believe that ONE personnel as well as other DD/X personnel, could make significant and valuable contributions as substantive intelli- gence advisors to chiefs of station. f is Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 g CERT a. The DD/I end .AD/: develop a long-term e pogrsn or 0113 staff personnel carefully artissIsted with the DD/I career planning policy. b. The DO negotiate with DD/P the establiiflt of at least five slots--to be furnished by the DD//- at major stations in critical areas of the world and staff these positions with DO officers assigned to render close sUbstantive support to chiefs of station in the respective areas. a. ONE vacancies be announced in DD/P staffs and divisions and the DD/P regularly nominate qualified officers for each vacancy as possible candidatee for staff service tours in ONE. 35. ONE seems to concentrate its t efforts on the selection of people with specific ares bacIgrod. and knowledge tn certain areas) such as Africa and Latin America it has been virtually impossible to find these specialists. We have been repeatedly advised that an area backgrowid may not be as essential to the drafting of good estimates as the ability to think clearly a write with facility. Experience over the years has demonstrated thatmagy of the best estimators bean their ONE careers without any specific area background. Althsugh ONE should not abandon its search for specialists) it should devote more attention to filliag existing vacancies with top-flight 2nnerslists who are clear thinkers and facile writers. - 23. -? ficrtriAL.2 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET 36. During the past two years there has been an increasing number of requests for special estimates and memoranda emanating from the White Nouse and other high echelons of the U.S. Govern- ment. This has resulted in an increased workload on some ONE staff*, particularly EB and FE. There is no evidence that this workload, which has required considerable overtime, will decrease, especially since we have learned that the ONE product is respected and read with great interest by the highest levels of Government. Under these pressures it would be infeasible for ONE to recruit generalists to fill certain existing vacancies, since even the best generalist would require some training in the estimating field. We believe that the problem can be resolved by increasing the ONE staff T/0 by six professionals. These officers, while eerving in an on-the-job training capacity, could also assist with some of the workload. As they pick up more and more of the work- load, the other professionals will presumably have more time for reading and thinking. Some 0311 staff personnel have commented that they sorely miss the opportunity to read the literature and reflect on developments in their area field of specialization. They consider the knowledge acquired from a review of this liters- ture to be a vitally important part of the estimating job. Addi- tional staff personnel would also permit more flexibility for career - 22 - 8-Ire T Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 C R T p].annii parpcaee and rotational tours as well as assure OR of adeeyatemanpower to fill as during emergencies. Da view of the tine money and effort that goes into the entire estima- tive process and the importance of the end product, the addition of six professionals, one for each staff (see Recommendation No. 4), in a temporary training status e a vary small investment. Zt is recommendedithat: The DWI initiate neaeesery stepe to increase of six 7rofessional ositione in 'Intimates Staff to provide incnvesed flexibility for the AD/NE to arimtnister his personnel progrmm. No. 37. ONE staff personnel commented favorably on the profes 1 competence and cooperation of the CCI and ORR personnel vith hat they work. The assistance, support, and contributions provided to ONE by these offices aro considered tote very good Way staff personnel previously served in these offices, and this has helped. ixemaeurably to develop the excellent rapport relationsand which exist between them. The entire present cle nt of the E Staff, for example, all came from either OCI or CRR. other hand as is critical of OBI. Specifically, I contributions as being too generelised and dng facts 051 believes that ONE should be more specific in tin tar of reference . It seems to us that the two offices have a &L. icult time communicating with and understanding one lino her. - 23 - ,8-11-641-1. Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 has ever served e. tour of duty with ONE, and we suspect that his mei be acontritjng factor to the lack of understand- ing between them. We believe that a resolution of the problem cod begin with the aesignment of an able OBI officer to ONE to York on papers dealing with military-scientific problems. Papers of this type have accounted for a considerable part of the overtine work required of some staffs. !eccnez54 that: No. 3 pt a policy of fiL1in one of his th an officer fram OSI serving on Ottj0nal basis. 39. In the organization of the ONE staffs, of Latin America and Africa in one staff seems i unrealistic. This combination may have originallybees a matter of administrative convenience. However, in view of the increasing Vor ldly importance of each area per se, we believe that the Latin America-Africa Staff should be divided into two separate staffs one for Latin America and one for Africa. We do not feel that the nunber of people working on any given area should necessarily determine whether that area should or sbould not be a separate et afr mat ion ble and - 24 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET It is reconded that: The AD/NX divide his present ice Staff into separate staffs for the two regtone and pureue as a staffing objective the maintenance of three or four estimator specialists in each of the new units. No.4 4o. ONE apparently views elevation to ship on the Board of National Estimates as the only financial method of rewarding its best estimators. Many staff personnel do not necessarily aspire to the Board, since they feel that the Board has insufficient oppor- tuntty for creative work and they would much prefer to continue drafting estimatee. Staff personnel respect many Board mem:hers and they feel that Board guidance and suggestions often strengthen the final estimate. However, when excellent estimator* are promoted to the Board, their talents and value to the Agency are diluted, aad they are truly not doing 'that they are best wall. fled to do. The importance of the estimate by itself should require that the estimate be drafted by the best available elan. We feel that the DD/I and the AD/NB together Should determine the worth of aperticular estimator. If he is considered to be tops in his profession, the DD/I and AD/NB should be permitted to 'remote him up to the 0848 level without changing his position or altering his responsibilities. - 25 icrii Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 It SECRET a reonmended that: No. 5 th the Director of Pereorinel devise a permit the promotion to super grade d estimators without changing their post- tions or responmibilitiee. This should be done with the utmost discretion and only in those cases where it is determined that it is in the best interests of the Agency. 41. We discussed the feasibility of the a Service and military officers to ONE staffs on ILLEGIB nt of Fbreign onal toure. personnel do not consider this to be a sound idea, since the development of an eetiaat1rig skill is in many eases a time-co nsujdx chore. There are a few examples of military officers on active duty who in the past served with the ONE Ettimaten Staff, and only one of these vas considered to have mode a, worthwhile contribution. FUrther, Foreign Service and military officers mey not consider such an assignment to be particWerly beneficial to advancement within their own major careers, which are usually outside of the field of intelligence. 42 On the other hand, many ONE staff personnel are favorablY disposed toward a rotational assignment for themselves with a pDlicy planning group in the Department of State or Department of Defense. Senior policy officials in State and Defense remarked that they would welcome ONE personnel on their staffs for tours of Such an assignment would permit the intelligence officer -26- Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET to gain ficant insight into the extent that policy plsnr is tnfluenced by natio telligence estimate ilLs back- experience in the estimative process would also permit him to mike valueble contributions to intelligence-related policy. He would be in a position to utilise his intelligence contacts to asetet the policy king machinery to the MC/ULM extent feasible. The intelligence officer would retura to ONE with brooder knowl- edge and experience which would enable Unto draft his estimates to be more reeponsive to the needs of the is reccomended that: DIVI arrange with appropriate State and officials the assignment of elle ONE staff officers to their policy planning staffs for speCific tours of duty. Beciprocol orrangements should be encouraged. licy makers. No 6 43. Over the yearn certain DD/1 positions have been co to be the excluelve pre currently etp.necl to s of the moot igport e.g., the DIVI himself, a memloer of the BNE jobs in the Agency: DANNE, and the - ..64)5.-14-JVC Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 DAD/CI respectively. Alt timating background in the R t T recognize the need for some job, we feel that there are DD/I men outside of ONE who may also be well qualified for this job. We have been advocating greater career planning for ONE personnel but we do not mean to imply that the better DD/I jobs be given exclusively to ONE. We feel that one of the ways that other wiz offices may be made more attractive is for the DD/I to designate all positions as DD/I slots rather than as slots belonging to a specific office. Within this framework the DD/I can till assure that the best estimator will spend most of his oareer in the estimating field. At the sane time morale in other /X components will be considerably strengthened by the knowledge that ONE is not getting preferential treatment for the better jobs. We stress the need to assure that interesting and stimulating careers are planned for ONE personnel,but we do not feel that the impression should continue that certain jobs are available only for ONE men. t is recommended that: No. 7 The DD/I insure that any of his ealoyees with proper qualifications will be considered for any existing vacancy in his directorate. Care should be exercised to insure that no position, particularly those overseas, be identified with any one DWI office. -28- Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 of h ii ible for the reference with the amettme ion process. i4es evoidAer4iont sbsr gedwith,rewamability tn &Auld it4 *rawermitly as MOerd Chairmen, Of these 12, two have bum Etit sinai its inception: four ere one i* tr4iicr economist **lathe Office three retired,genorel itati flag -29 - Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 1511CR reekotfieem the thiee services. Of the remaining two members one has aims& baftrotesd and mei to the Mr a decade ego fromECAehils hie collesque? *owing *oath* State Department, joined the group not long after. A senior etation chief from the Deputy Direetor (Plane) will join the Mbar& in a few woks. With the exception of the retired selitery and soma of the DO office alumni, the Datrd outer* have been lap:lace for over half a, deiced.. 46. The ortensl Sowed vita =WeedOf idUSle asselevina es "outstanding scholars of national repute, experts in the field* of strategy, political science, economics, and other social sciences.' V* believe the conoept of haming both out- siders and insiders, as it mere, on the Board is a healthy one. The pollitaity of eventual promotion to the Board gives the semi= staff weiber s goal. The outsiders bend to the AelmaY free* atigratch aid heir to stifle any tendency towards intellectual intmeatims- 47. It is ent7 difficult to attreAt heccsemi-permanent matters of the Doer& The inspection teem believes the concept of-part-titer or ehopt-tera kelt ere from the outside is to be eneannete. rOT several years aseiber of the ?VI:metal faoulty has spent the bulk ofhis eussew balder 30 sis(bArrir Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Nap # 31- $SCRit Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 "ler SECR selected because of their aver-all skill t solely because of their past military The icy of harin a representative from each of the three military services on the Board be reconsidered. 49. We would favor bringing one or more senior foreign service officers and a scientist onto the Board. The nature of the Board does not lend itself to rigid delineation,of the type of individa1 desired. Once again, we stress the need to insure that indivicimal is selected solely because of his outstanding qu.sJ.iftcations. TO get the high-level foreign service officer ONE seeks, it will probably be necessary for the DCI personally to approaeh the Secretary of State with a request for the services of an individual of aMbassadorial rank and definitely one who has not retired. In the case of a scientist), since there are a limited nutber of NIMIs with scientific overtones, we believe he should be sufficiently broad to be able to deal with problems outside his own field--possibly the type of individual desired is a proteeaial writer on scientific subjects. T Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 -mon. fiXCXIT No. 9 - 33 - irrirtir Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 X T o apositirn. re U Una woos. r opportunity should bet provior the =hens rsre. in no, tyro 41, to zti of ormativiV. We aria of the *pinion inarpoiter availablat l*re Oat id =it lattellortual.4 and that soot ia naoessary 4 ti 34 - 1K-6-1?titi Per Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 41110.' 35 - S14iV?t No. 10 of Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 S 3 C R T Ccnault&Lt8 ly 1952 there hes been a cont aeeociate leading civilian specialists in international affairs and former members of 0103 with the CIA &temente of the estimating process. The roster of consultants now stands at 23, including two in processing. Nine are former members of the Board of tionnl Bstimates and three are farmer asters of the CM ime.tes Staff. Available consultants are assembled periodically at Princeton University as a panel to consult with appropriate Board and staff members on current estimates and estimating problems. The frequency of meetings during the early years was eight times anntall,y. Currently this is declining to an average of four meetings per year. Several of the consultants serve periodically In OltMs and ottani in Government azeigements are in frequent contact with the Agency on official business. 54. The original objective In establishing the consultant panelwas to obtain independent expert jud nt on national seciartty problems and to guard against gaps and deficiencies in staff and Board analysis. But the increasing professionalism of the performance and the superior sources of Information available to ONZ bave combined to alter the nature ce the consuitsi rlationel2ip. Workin.g staff were virtually unanirsous in their Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRBT judgment that the relationship had lost its principal intended value. It is now described as a one-'s y relationship on sUbstantive problems in which the consultants are recipients rather than genuinely constructive contributors to the ONE analysis. 55. The potential value of the individual consultant is by no an ruled out particularly in areas and sUbject fields where ONE experience is 3knOted or where the pre-eminence or freshnees of view of the potential consultant practically guarantees useful discussion. In the case of the Princeton panel, however, the ONE staff finds the corporate approach often superficial and time consuming. No satisfactory way has been found to prune from the panel those mailers who by staff consensus have ceased to make useful contributions. 56. Panel procedures were also criticized. with respect to the time allotted participants?usually overnight?to familiarize themselves with the texts and critical problems analyzed in the estimates. An inordinate amount of group time is then expended making up for lack of "homework". Preferred approaches to consulting would include longer sessions with smaller groups thoroughly prepared for the discussions, or employment of thi. consultant at Headquarters to assist in the drafting of the estimate. - 37 - B11-1---rt Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SZCRET anti . The coneultents provide- a lal vales in pronoting favorab in assisting ORM vith its prdblema. 3wh bef its are difficult to measure questionable vbether the present composition of the penal represents a broad. enough approach to the universities the matter of eountering hostile attitudes tovards intelligence. The teem did, not find convieeing evidence that the consultants had lived up to their potential in either field. 58. In summary, the frame of retreence for the present ORE ultant program has changed dme to the growing eonPetenoe of personnel, the lack of flexibility in reahing experts vho can a significant contribution, and due to growing dissatisfaction with the consulting procedures. Mo. 11 Preeti sue a policy of ccoisultation with regarded by his staff and Board tiro coeitributions to specific drafting phase. Lit?E4 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET Ulapeous Pro*tma aro, $pce 5R. ONE has succeeded over since it inetian. it keeping ito administrative? support and ea,retartal elerents to a minimum. Out of a total on board strength of secretaries or typists and a Support Staff of nine, The latter group is composed of an Deformation Control Branch of who perform the normal document routing and registry functione for the office. The group also handles document logging for the DIVi's immediate office. A Publications Drench of iadividuals cuts stencils on the drafts of US's, proofreads drafts and printer4s galleys of NIE and rums off such other documents as the Daily Status Report. The Reading Room Branch with a. staff o dies the library facilities in the special intelligence area. 60. ONE is having a difficult time in finding and keeping adeqpate clerical assistance. ONE'e situation in this regard in not unique but is a part of the leaver Agency problem of encouraging secretaries to commute to the Headqearters Building. The teem does wish to record its belief that ONE requires a high priority for secretaries in view of its alreade spartan staffing arrangements and if necessary, its clerical grade structure should reflect this priority. . 39 . Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET d by the o6.12 who is of ONE s charter ears responsible for preparing the budget looking looting and supervising the secretarial.cierical office. She has no designated assistant or deputy. The team understands that in her absence the administrative problems that cannot be postponed until her return sre ied. on a tch.as-catch-can basis. We are of the o1ninn that ONE have a designated individual, in the grad, range of OS-7 to 9, assisting the Administrative Officer and trained to take over during her Absence. it is recommended. that: Ihe take steps to acvi.re a slot earl recruit an Assistant Administrative Officer. 6e. The moot serious 'Into complaint voiced to the tean was the prdblem of crowded working conditions for the stStee Staff. With the exception of the staff chiefs, the are two or three to a rCCM6 Privacy for the sodwioi ful ideas couched in finished prose is unavailable. A mer of staff meMbers indicated they wrote the bulk of the work No. 12 25X1 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET over the weekend eben 4 modicum of privacy ix available. it would appear to be outrageous economics to house the comparatively well-pait estimators under these rabbit warren 3-audition*. We believe the minimum adequate for the individvel is a single room however small. If space is available elsewhere in the Readquarters structure other then on the seventh floor, we believe the need for space outweighs the convenience of being close to OME's front office. 63. Security is also a potential problem under such close working conditions. There is a diffusion of responsibility, and when in a small complex, such as the Et Staff witl "people, some individuals have special cleeranaes while others do not, risk of compromise is ever present. 1t ie,receemeleded thltl No. 13 The AD/ME request the DD to make the stremost possible representation to the DD/S to mike minimal adequate space availdble for the now badly overcrowded letimates Staff. Weeirk Survey of Cold Wiiwr Crisis ittions and RegiOnal?SurveYs 64. The "Cold War Survey" evolved ea an OM plication about a year age. The creation of the weekly is very largely in response to a re-TWA from General Maxwell Taylor, thee Military Adviser to the President. It is understood to be for the cemsumption or top volley level readers and net for the country specialist. 43. Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SIC 11;Ir Sta-Asy preaenta a capsule judgment of crisis 65. The erea4n eseence almost an OCT handling of crisis situations. tive quality of ONE is brought into play by the function of a weekly review of current and potential problem areas and the decision as to Which merit attention. Ths NU process is brought to bear by means of a Mnard 0314.111042, interagency coordination and OSTS approval. The format of the Survey calls for the introduction of New Situations" changes in areas discussed in earlier issues and a checklist of watched areas. 66. Normally crisis situation are discusae1 on Fridays by the Board and Staff eenbers assigned to the Survey aIong with two sUbstantive representatives of OCT. The OCT personnel normally draft a third or more of the publication. The Dnip does not participate in the initial drafting. However," his comments are solicited on each draft prior to final publication. Prom first composition through USIB approval takes from Hands4y morning through Wednesday noonof each week. 67. This plication differs eram the weekly report of the ifttch Committee in that the Latter covers military- -hot war?situatioas while the Cold War Survey is more deeply Involved in judements of political situation*" which in some cases have obvious nilitary or eoueterinsurgency overtones such as recent Indonesian...West New - /42 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 gr, a been advised that a Committees general coverage is probably going to be to the Sino-Soviet Bloc military threat. Such a development would throw a greater workload an the small group producing the Survey and their numbers may have to be enlarged. OCI is probably the place to look for such assistance. 68. The survey team discovered mimed readership interest in the pUblication. We were repeatedly assured that Oeneral Taylor found it very useful and liked the present foembr.t. A senior State Department official stated he read it faithfully and never found any eurprises" in it. A senior Pentagon official reported that it has a vide readership and that it is a 'meta publication. ONE ?tat generally were of the opinion that the publication is too costly and adds little to an understanding of the areae Involved. In view of this mixed reaction, we believe that the views of the intelligence community should be solicited from time time. It is _cainen Ikat: No. 1.14. poll the intelligence eozsmznity periodically the continuing usefulness of the Cold War of 1962 t native Revie ed a new publication This publication - 43 Si?ltrift' Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 BSCRST is designed to provide a general estimative outlook on an area as a Whole, the kinds of change considered likely to occurs and the foreseeable contingencies which might precipitate such change. We feel that such innovations are to be commended. Anamelysis of regional interrelationships should prove to be of value to policy n'uore concerned with sueh Obis lye 70. ID . 1 lays on the DCI responsibility for identification on a current basis of Priority National /ntelligence Objectives (PNIO's) and for their issuance to the inteiligSnes *casualty. 1110's should be valid over a period and limited to thee* eritieal factors requiring special attention aver and above normal collection and researdh efforts. The FX101e hems beau divided into four broad categories or criticality snd disseminated as per Dom no. 1/3 (Revised 7 arch 1962). 0M3 staffs out tha PNIO's annually utilising the WEE coordination mechanism. Submiseione are received from contributing agenele84 an is coordinated and the final draft goes to US1S for %wove... suggestions -were proposed for rolifying the xistingsyst - 44 - JC-N-T-ii`T Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET d Validityudies 71. rtam is a study prepared after the completion of a uaticmal intelligenceestimate to record and highlight the deficiencies and gape in information pertaining to the estinate. The study is coordinated and approved by the MIR and disseminated as an official USIB document. Essentially the post-mortem represents a guide to the collector, but the extent to which the collector relies on this study per se is dubious. There is naturally considerable overlap between the deficiencies recorded in a post-mortem and the regular requirements samitted by other CIA components and the rest of the intelligence community. The fulness and value of a post-mortem is questioned by ONE, but two examples were cited wherein specific collection action vas undertaken in apparent response to a post-mortem. 72. Initially a poot-mortem was prepared rwtinely after the completion of each estimate. Fewer post-mortens were prepared in succeeding years despite an increase in the nunber of estimatee since ONE often considers a post-mortem unneceosary and of dubious value. There appears to be no clear-cut policy pertaining to the preparation of post-mortems. Today a post-mortem is prepared only if the drafter or chairmen of an estimate or a MIS representative determines it to be worthwhile. -45- s 1"124-1r. Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 S E C E T 73. The validity study is a review of the last estimate on a given sUbject to determine how accurate that estimate appears to be vith the paesage of time. It is usually undertaken about one year after the completion of the estimate and just prior to the beginning of a subsequent estimate oa the same subject. The validity study is coordinated and approved by the USIB and dsse4'nted as an official MIS document. 74. We understand that initially validity studies were regularly prepared for most estimates. The number of validity studies has decreased immeasurably over the years, since OBS has conaiderei studies to be too perfUnctory. OM feels that it is more useful and valuable to prepare a study assessing the validity of estimates completed over a period of several years On 4 given area or subject. Here again, the policy is and the decision to prepare a validity study is left to the am of the drafter or chairman of an estimate or to 4 reet om a USIB representative. 4t LarOc0mos46a4 So. 15 The AWES, in consultation with USIB representatives, ostoblieh firm guidelines delineating the condi ions under which a post-mortem or validity study be prepared. SEM Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Page(s) In Document Denied Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 25X1 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 8 X C R U T te is read with great interest by the highest levels of Government. Noweer, it is still dwbions whethex the est1te is read as extensively as it should be throughout the Oovernt,. In view of its importance and potential Impact on the making of policy, we feel that a eampaign should be undertaken to insure that the ast1ste definitely reaches all appropriate senior officiels. In this =action, we suggest that a personal copy of each estimate be sent to appropriate officials in State and Defense e.g., en ASS tent secretary. This copy should be accompanied by a persona letter from the Del, DDCI, or DOI requesting am evaluation and omments on its utility. We feel that a promotional program of this kind will eventv411y insure a weater use and infitiaa0a of the timate on the policy-me-1E5ns ar-eratus. rlooMMaadel,that: No. 17 The DWI transmit a personal copy of each estimate to lected Govermnemt officials to widen the realerahip and increase the influence of estimates among policy maters. Each copy should be accavextmlby a personal letter from the rica, DDCI, or op,' requosting an evaluation and commenta on its utility. - 49 - SECRET Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 offer where natio can be etre lined CERT ve suggestions and call a ces may be required to pre to problem areas contributions for estinates. In this way the research programs be more respoosive to upcoming ONR reqpirements as well as to anticipate and ellmtnate unnecessary duplicative research. Regrettably in pest years ONE only glanced at these programs and. reacted in a vary perfunctory manner. Rowerverk ORE took time and responded in some detail to (RR's latest research program. ORR was pleased and impressed with ORS's critical review and sutione. Constructive criticiam of research programs is a salutary and useful natation and serves to develop a greater uaderstanding between producer and consumer. ONE should be encouraged to review these programs regularly in a detailed and aningful manner. It is recommended tbe, latissat 18 AD/RE insure that ONE review and comment constructively MR and OS/ research programs on a regular basis. ]ionshi,s between cam and an A APP4 ?rence has been made previously to the limitations on ction of an interagency process. There are severe restraints identifying both substantive and management deficiencies in other agencies and ia making practical - - SECRET Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 vary limtted f serckanism or a White with thie sUbject caeprehens 81. Assiamment of substantive Juriedicttonz to the ETh les ae provided in =ID L. 3 is regarded by zany MIX aa unnecessarily rigid. There is no obvious merhimism for reand redress When the level of research and estimative effort of egiven USD agency is regarded in am deficient. Of e obeervers expressed fear of aiueoeaserzr duplication Of effort. the agencies. Quite to the eontrary, many the right of any agency to prepare estimative contxibntiz? on any subject and endorsed the proposition that the iein agency institute its own research program to re4 the iW4Oiee it identified in the program of another agency. CIA research on milltary defense systems and on economic 'abloom in western eountriee were the two examples on this point ly cited to us. The V= specialised committee (e.g., the rzcientific lligence Committee) do not appear to emplgy a policy of eoarUnatLon of their estimative contributiona consistent with thedoctrine on this subject employed by the Board of lational 51 C R 3 T Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SSCRICT a ohs of eitch other te be believe that both or two *aril discussions of tha the notes of such discus SISCRZT Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 6 CRET as a major element of press of business on senior officials ot AVE and WI provide the leadership in discussions. *ccndthat: No 20 establish the prairy of o1d4n tato4ace appropriate *et el the ter terms of reference estimate; that the aotes o to the ;resent terms of re stieste. WTI% -pm a validity studies 'by te studies 5OUM take poor fled. On the end)ject loess. lave easisentel xfs timattne are resarded of performance 13y the of bringing pressur,-,*e to beer no standards and no objectivee coneer 53 - BICCRIT Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 SECRET *election, trax4ng, and career management of estimators. There Is no formal provieion for community review of the staffing end progragesing efforts of each member mange, for enforcement of deadlines, end for correctioa of deficient personal performance in writing end coordinating estimettee drafts. 1:tjs_rIcamairded that: No. 21 The DD/l in concert with the Assistant to the Da for Coordination propose to the CB13 a review of management aspects of the MIS estimating process for the purpose of recoraimg agreed deficienates in estimating eerformaace, *proving procedures, eetablishing standards of personnel selection and career management, and evaluating periodicall.1 the Objeetives and levels of renearch effort in the intelligence evades. 85. Mere le no formal reviresent that the DD/P provide regeler contributione to the national estimatiowenveess. However, DD/P seggeostions are invited on the echeduling of topics for future estimating and on the terms of reference for specific estimates gettingtmOer way. 86. Mot ONE staff with Whoa the Object wee disavowed ocmaidared that their ccammnication with the DD/P was satisfactory and that the DD/P s becoming ineressingly freak and *cooperative In deacribing its programs and objectives in as under estimative analysis. Exchanep of personnel between the two areas SECRET Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 ? 53CRIT has been rather limited in the past and this survey has recommendations on this sUbject earlier In this Section. 87. Apprsisal of the significance of estimates to the DD/P involved sUhstantive questions which could not be full/ investigated within the scope of the present inspection. An example illustrating the fact that RIR's and operational programa are not always in ac4ord concerned estimative views on covert action projects now under wey in' taffseebers observed that, in their judement, these projects in the past have been oriented too narrowly to the support of political factions hostile to any sonemmodation of their parties vie a vie th41-7 Without judging the merits of this particular issue, it would seem essential that wide disparities of view between the DD/P and the DD/I be recognised and re-examined frequentler. One =ens of insuring sudh exchange of views would be to solicit DD/I-ORM comment annuakly on the Related Missions Directives of the DD/P for foreign cowitries. The DD/P should on such occasions brief key DD/I personael on the seneral scope of their covert action programs. Re recommenthttion is offered on this point sines it applies to DD/I-00 relations in general and not alone to the ONE-DD/PrelsAdonebip. In addition, the small size of the OW Estimates Staff ansi the heavy workloads carried by - 55 - SECRVT Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 Approved For Release2006/10/13 : CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6 1 SECR3 T major in= the major Objective here is Titre a sharp appreolation it estimators operating prdblerm of intelligence oonsumers. 56 Approved For Release 2006/10/13: CIA-RDP80-00948A000100020012-6