ECONOMIC - COAL, COKE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210252-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 10, 2002
Sequence Number: 
252
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 31, 1953
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210252-4.pdf250.01 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2002/08/06 : CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210252-4 COUNTRY SUBJECT HOW PUBLISHED WHERE PUBLISHED DATE PUBLISHED LANGUAGE CLASSIFICATION CONFIDSNTTAL CENTRAL INTELLIGE CEIAGENCY ION INFORMATION FROM FOREIGN DOCUMENTS OR RADIO BROADCASTS Economic - Coal, coke Monthly pei iodi.cals Moscow Jun, Dec 1952 THIS DOCUN[NT CONTAINS INFONNATION A//[CTINA INI NATIONAL 0II[NSI CF THE UNITED STAY!! WITHIN TIE ATONING 01 IS FIONAf[ ACT !0 U. ! C.. 31 AND )l, A! ATENDID ITS T-321-0. ON TNN AIY(LATION 0F ITS COST/NT! IN III YANNIN To AN ONAYIOONIT[D ![ICON IN .. 0. nulTtD ^I LAN. Nn[ooucrION DI TNU TONY IN rNONmnD 25X1A REPORT NO. CD NO. DATE OF DATE DIST. 31 Mar 1953 NO. OF PAGES 4 SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT NO. THIS IS UNEVALUATED INFORMATION CLLAIiITIv, 3TORA,E, ArdD TITILIZATION OF 1.I3SR COALS SUITABLE FOR COKING CCAL CLEANIr:.i PROVIDE'S MORE RAW MATERIAL, FOR COKING -- Moscow, Ugol;, No 6, Jun 52 in the nest 5 years coke by-products plants in the southern part of the USSR have,ch1evtd great success in extending supplies of coal suitable for cok- ing. To this end the composition of coal Thanes has been radically changed. In 1933, the charges contained an average of 0.1 percent of gas coal; in 1940, 7.5 percent; and Ln 1951, 15.1 g rcent. During 1951, lean coal. was introduced into the charge in the Novo-Makeyev,a, Sinolyaninovskiy, Mushketovskiy, Kramatorsk, and Khanzhenkovsu y plants The Main Admini.?traticn of Coke, the South. Office of the Main Administration of Coke, and scientific instit,uti:ns of the USSR have cooperated with the coke by-products plants in an effort t:o draw upon new r_ouls for coking, taking into zonsideration the correct composition of the charge and the continual improvement in the quality of the coke both in chemical composition and in mechanical prop- ert[r:s. Experiments have indicated that it is possible to increase the propor- tion of gas coal used In a coking charge and to utilize lean coal with a low sulfur cone nt (less than 1,i percent) and long-flame cool with a medium sulfur content less than 2. - verse-t.l At present, ire amountj ncoal which would be valu- tlr, far coking are nOt b_ing sent to coal-cleaning plants simply because they ore dif!icult to elenr Exa.mple_ of th.s are coral from Vas.cl,yevskaya Mine No 4 and Vasil `vevskn-cr: Mire ;an 6 of the Bog:urnyevugoi' Trust, Kapital'naya Solna ,I; n' O f the Ya h_ Sovet.::ln/FOl' Trust, Severo-Gundorovskaya Mire of the RostovTlgol.' Com- bine- , and froar: Mire rro 18 of the frnenodcnugol' Trust.. cos1, from another large group of mine:: have properties which would make them :,uitab.l.e for coking but not only is their ash content high but they also coned:tt up to. 4-I, r--:cent of ul.fur Such coals: can be used for coking only if Eti.ven it preliminary cleaning to remove the ash and the sulfur This will make IT. Imssible to eliminate the harmful activity of the mineral kernels on the mechanical properties of the blast furnace coke and will contribute towards the mnintenonce of the former level of productivity of the blast furnaces and the former level of consumption of coke and flux ; sr ton of pig, iron, ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2002/08/06 : CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210252-4 Approved For Release 2002/08/06 : CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210252-4 25X1A D Coal ash is of two different types (1) free or external ash which has come from the roof, floor, or layers of rock, and (2) ash which is closely bound up in the organic mass of the coal. The former type is more harmful since it forms the nucleus for cracks in the coke.. However, this type of ash is easily removed by mechanical cleaning and there is no need of deep clean- ing:. If the sulfur content has to be reduced simultaneously with the ash, then deep cleaning is required- fT-h:Ls coal-cleaning method depends on the fact that the constituents of coal have different specific gravities. A solution with an intermediate specific gravity is selected and the coal is immersed in it; where- upon, the heavier substances sink and the lighter substances rise to the sur- face_7 Experiments in cleaning were conducted at the following specific grav- it;ear. 1.8, 1. ,6, 1.5, 1..1+, and 1.3. It was discovered that the amount of sulfur eliminated increased with each decrease in the specific gravity.. At the same time., the amount of concentrate to be used for coking purposes decreased. How- ever, this was compensated for an increase in the amount of residue that could be used for fuel purposes. The coal selected for the experiments had a sulfur content ranging from 4 to 6.68 percent. In all cases, it was either Type K or Type PZh coal. Type K coal came from the following mines;: Mine No 178, Ovcharnyy seam; Stall Mine No 5, Bulatovskiy seams and Mine No 68, Solenyy seam. Type PZh coal came from Nikitovka Mine No 6-'i, Kirpichevka seam; Gorlovka Mine No 40, Yuzhnaya Arshinka seam; and Mine No 134, J, Kamenskiy seam. -- Ya, M. Cbukhovskiy Coal from the Ki.zel basin is characterized by its valuable coking proper- ties and by a high yield of gas and chemical by-products evolved in the process of coking. However, the use of Kizel coal for coking requires preliminary clean- tng. From run-of-the mine coal, with an ash content of 21.5 percent and a sulfur content of 58 percent, 62-71 percent of ccncentrate can be obtained with an ash content of 10-11 percent and a sulfur content of 3.2-3.3 percent.. The phosphorus content of rum-of-the mine coal is slight, ranging from 0.007-0.012 percent. It is bound up with the mineral part of the zoal and separates out completely during the clean'.,g process although traces of it are usually detected in the concentrate. Nonferrous metallurgy and the then ical industry are the chief consumers of Ktzel coal. Plans are under way to Jr-velum the cleaning of this coal and, when that has been done, the coke by-products industry of the Urals will undoubtedly become its largest consumer. In nonferrous metallurgy, coke is used mainly for water-,jacket smelting of nickel and cohr.r. This type of coke may differ from nlast furnace coke in the following re- spect. I . In vater-ja.:ket smelting a suifirization cf' the ores takes place and c:.eequently the reztrict:.on in the suifu-r ccnteru of the coke drops. In addi- tion to the sulfur in the coke, from 1 2 to 1 8 percent of sulfur is introduced in the r?harg(- (in prop'rt.ion to the ore) In the form of sulfur-containing fluxes (pyrite, gypsum), For the complete elimination of sulfur-containing fluxes the rsUlfut content in the coke can he brought to 6 7 percent. 2: In water- ja(-ket smelting less consumption of coke is required in com- parison with other raw ntterials than in blae.t furnace smelting, 3. The toughness of the coke tatty be loser since the water-jacket. furnace is several times smaller In dimensions than the blast. furnace, Approved For Release 2002/08/06 : CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210252-4 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2002/08/06 : CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210252-4 25X1A 4. The temperature for the process of water-jacket smelting is considerably lower than for the blast furnace method and this permits the utilization of less tough coke. 5. Since less coke is consumed in water-jacket smelting there is less need of restricting the ash content of the coke than in the case of a blast furnace. With the normal operation of the furnaces on Gubakhinski y coke flrom Gubakhin- skiy Plant located in Molotovskaya Oblast] the content of monoxide in the gas yield may be lowered to 2-3 percent and, when operating on Kemerovo and Donets coke, it may be reduced to 5-6 percent. Thus the Gubakhinskiy coke burns with better utilizaton of its calorific value because of its greater firmness and smaller number of pores. This explains the fact that after the conversion of the water-jacket furnaces to operation on Gubakhinskiy coke with its higher ash content, the consumption of it (in percent of the charge) did not increase in comparison with the consumption of Kemerovo or Donets coke with their lower ash content. Gubakhinskty coke contains a rather high amount of sulfur, up to 3 percent, which decreases the consumption of sulfur-containing flux used in smelting oxidized nickel ores, This permits a reduction of almost 50 percent in the consumption of gypsum (from 10-11 to 6-7 percent of the weight of the raw ore) Ural copper plant coke consumption for smelting copper ranges from 2.6 to 5.6 percent of the weight of the charge. The chief qualitative requirements for coke used in the copper-smelting industry are that it should be well fused and lacking in small particles. The latter reduce the gas permeability and create unnecessary resistance for gases passing through the charge shaft, The ash content of coke going to Ural copper plants is, at present, 16-17 percent. Although Kizel coal cannot make up a 100-percent charge for a blast fur- nace because of its high content of ash and sulfur, experiments conducted in the Magnitogorsk Metallurgical Combine have indicated that up to 50 percent of Kizel coal may be combined with other coals containing less ash and sulfur to make a satisfactory blast furnace charge -- 0, F. Vaysberg EXPERIMENTS IN STOFAiE OF COAL FOP. COF=-_N,_': -- Moscov, La Ecoromiyu Topliva, No 6, Jun 52 Inefficient storage of coal brings about considerable losses in its coking properties and, as a result, the quality of the metallurgical coke obtained from such coal is impaired. In this connection, Et is seldom taken into account that a change in the coking properties of the coal may occur before changes in its Other properties are observed, For economy and preservation of the quality Of coal it is necessary to estab.'.ieh the best time limits for storing coal of different types. To this end, industrial experiments were carried out in eastern coke by-products plants using types of Suznet:k and Karaganda coal suitable for coking. A study was made of the influ-ncc of the length of storage on the coking properties of coal in the mechan.zed coal storage area of the Magnitogorsk Metallurgical Plant and the ground i-toragc area: of the Chelyabinsk and Nizhne- Tagil Fr':ants In setting up the experimental t~i'_ec, areas were selected which were suit- abie for dumping and for preserving the piles in their entirety. Each pile in the mechanized storage area contained B,lO0-10.000 tons and each pile in the ground storage area contained +,000-6,000 tone in both cases the piles were Approved For Release 2002/08/06 : CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210252-4 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2002/08/06 : CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210252-4 25X1A 60-100 meters long. Piles in the mechanized storage area were 22 meters wide and 9-10 meters high while those in the ground storage areas were 10 meters wide and 4-6 meters high. Observations indicated that the average diameter of the coal lumps de- creased during storage and changes in the elementary composition of the 'coal were observed, for most types of coal only after lengthy storage.. These changes were slight except for G2 and KZh types of coal, as is indicated in the following table: Name of Mine and Coal Pionerka, G2 Osinovskiy, Zhl Storage Period C H 0 (days) M 0 84.93 5.70 5.47 45 84.55 5.78 5.1'2 0 88.38 5.51 2.89 75 88,35 5.53 2.87 150 88.58 5.48 2.65 190 88.52 5.40 2.66 0 86.03 5.68 5.42 45 86.10 5.30 5.30 90 85.95 5.54 5.00 170 85,08 5,61 5.67 0 45 75 105 150 200 89.03 5.30 2.77 .89.12 5.06 3.27 88.52 5.29 3.75 88.57 5.18 3.87 88.64 5.21 3.58 88.38 5.06 3.64 0 89.64 4.88 2.56 45 89.73 5.07 2.46 95 89..62 4.87 2.59 200 88.77 4.96 2.66 Uncleaned Karaganda 0 87,20 5.39 5.12 coal 35 87:,22 5.27 5:12 50 87.53 5,25 5.43 The coking properties of coal are the least stable of its characteristics during storage and loss of them is noticed much earlier than loss of other qualitative characteristics of coal. Experiments were conducted to determine how long coal could be kept in storage without deterioration of its coking properties using K coal from the Mines imeni Molotov and Stalin, K2 coal from Kiselevskiy Mine, KZh coal from Krasnogorekaya Mine, Zhl coal. from Osinovskiy Mine, Zh2 coal from Baydayevskiy Mine, G2 coal from Pionerka Mine, and both cleaned and unclaned Karagatda coal. As a result of these experiments, the following time limits have been set: up a:3 mnct favorable for storage of Kuznetsk and Karaganda coal.: G2 coal, not more than lz months; Zh.l coal, not more than 2 months; 1h2 coal, not more than 2 months, KZh coal, not more than 2 months; K coal not more than :1I months., f.2 coal , not more than 14 months: cleaned Karaganda coal, not more than one month; unoleaned Karaganda cc.al, not more than one month.. V.V. Bogoyavlen kiy, M. G. Fel.'dbri::, V. L. Kxol`, and Ye. A.. Khersonnkaya Approved For Release 2002/08/06 : CIA-RDP80-00809A000700210 ILLEGIB