KULAK ACTIVITIES, ANTI-KULAK MEASURES IN RUMANIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 11, 2011
Sequence Number: 
474
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 8, 1952
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5.pdf211.87 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5 CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL SECURITY INFORMATION CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY REPORT INFORMATION FROM FOREIGN DOCUMENTS OR RADIO BROADCASTS CD NO. COUNTRY Rumania DATE OF SUBJECT Political; Economic - Kulaks INFORMATION 1951 - 1852 agricultural policy HOW DATE DIST. PUBLISHED Daily newspapers; bimonthly periodical ~ Doe 1952 WHERE PUBLISHED Bucharest N0. OF PAGES 4 DATE PUBLISHED 19 Dec 1951 - 8 Aug 1952 KIII.AK ACTIVITIES, ANTI-Ki1I.AK MEASURES IN RUMANIA Comment: The Rumanian p^ess available in FDD, CIA, does not or- dinarily publish articles dealing directly with dissatisfaction, pea- sant resistance, or failures of the regime However, the frequent articles on kaiaks seem to serve ea an indication of rural irregulari- ties, failures in quota collection, sad opposition. In the following selection of articles, kaiaks are accused of sabotage of agricultural machinery, quota deliveries, and political meetiz3s. They are charac- terized as a maJor obstacle to the attainment of socialism in agricul- ture The kaiaks fierce resistance to the present regime le one of the main ob- staclee do the socialist transformation of Rumanian agriculture. They defy the restrictive measures taken by the state. They still influence some oP the back- ward elementsiatheir communities; and they infiltrate the ranks of the state po- litical machinery in order to gain favor among party leaders. In short, the kaiaks are the greatest threat to the working population and to the nation. Although the number of kaiak farms has been artificially reduced to one third of the previous number, the Central Committee of the Rumanian Workers' Party has estimted that 5.50 percent of the total number of peasant farms are kaiak farms. Under the present regime, it appears that the number of middy class peasants has actually increased proportionately with the number of kaiaks. All this amounts to a critical situation, when the numerous methods of devia- tion used by the kaiaks are coneidered.(1) Despite their numerous acts of sabotage, k~:laks are often shown an easy- going attitude by the party officials. Because of their former influence, many rich peasants are listed as "middle class peasants," assuming this protective title in order to escape the heavy payments which are demanded of a kulak.(2) Thus, Grigore Reordorescu from Vutcani, landowner anfl,vell-known ]~ulak,~per- suaded the people's council to list him as a middle cldss peasant. In so doing, STATE ARMY CLASSIFICATION NAW NS"ne T _ __ I AIR FBI -~ Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5 they permitted him to keep goods belonging to the working population. As a con- sequence, he vas denounced by small peasants Toma Ivanescu, Gheorghe Parvu and Panait Iordache. Such acts of arbitrary re-classification are punishable by heavy fine and lmprisonment.(3) Opposition to Delivery oP Quotas Oae of the most common misdeeds of the kuleks is their refusal to deliver their allotted quotas to the state. Malty such instances can be found. For ex- ample kaiaks Ion Profir, Gheorghe Vrabie, and Petre Briceag of Raneati Bach xith- held 3,000 kilograms of cereals and hid them underground. When the authorities discovered this, they sentenced the kaiaks to 5 years' imprisonment and 100,000 old lei fine. SSmilarly, Mitu Naumica of Maicanesti wen sentenced to 9 years'im- prisonment, plus a heavy fine, and Gheorghe Leica of the same commune vas sen- tenced to 11 years' imprisonment and 60,000 old lei fine.(4) Only 82 percent vi the wheat quota sad 72 percent of the corn quota for the 1951 harvest had been collected as of December 1951 Sn a majority of the regiunes. The entire problem of quota nondelivery by kulske stems from a lack of respoaei- bility on the pant of the regiune executive committees, which fall to create suf- ficient political agitation among the peasant: (S) Ia C1u,J Regiune, kuleks have often attempted to influence the peasants Mast selling their produce to state cooperatives, against delivery of the mandatory quotas, and against entering agricultural collectives. That such kaiak activities are allowed to continue proves the ineffi:iency of the people's councils and execu- tive committees of the respective regiune.(2) Sabotage of Agricultural Machinery Another subversive activity of the kuleks is the deliberate sabotage of agri- cultural machinery. For example, a number of kuleks from Corabia and Caracal sold their used threshing machines at a fraction of their actual coat, without reporting that parts were missing. The machines were purchased by poor peasants who vere duped by these "generous offers." In reality, however, kuleks Vasile Zamfir, SlIDion Ruts, Ilia Gavrilescu, and many others vere attempting to sabotage the harvesting campaign by the Bale of these defective machines. Consequently, the kuleks received heavy punishment.(6) The lax manner in which kuleks repaired farm machinery was demonstrated in vari- ous regions of the country. In Aaius Raioa, for example, all threshing machines vere in good repair, with the exception of two machines belonging to kuleks Vasile Balint and h~ilia Popa. The executive committee of the local people's councl7. yea guilty oY gross negligence when it relied ua the promises of these two kuleks to maintain the machines !n good xorking order. It vas only thrcugh the efforts of the raion pri- mary party organization that the true conditions were uncovered and the intended sabo- tage averted. Another example is that oP kuleks Iondin Pienaru from Alba Iulia, Stefan Repede from Mihalt, and Avram Graaescu from Beriu, all of whom attempted to sabotage the threshing and harvesting campaign by removing vital pieces from their reapers and threshing machines. All were immediately tried and sentenced. Also punished were Visoiu Lazar Prom Strei-Saageorgiu and Nichofor Petrsacu from Ciugud, both of whom have failed to repair their agricultural machinery up to the present time. To allevi- ate these conditions, the executive committees of the people's councils x111 have to intensify their precautionary measures against similar acts of sabotage.(7) Careful xatch must be maintained over kuleks who try to gain unwarranted privi- leges. For example, the Trusesti People's Council authorized kaiak Ion Radulescu Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5 from Movila R?pt3 to dismantle several threshing machines end tractors and to sell the pieca.s as scrap iron, for profit, The excuse offered was that the machines were no longer usable; the actual reason was leek of vigilance against the asbotagiag ac*.s of :.hs kula_ks,(8) ` To es_ape the restrlctlons in.Plicted upon them, many of the kulsks re- sort to the bribing of party an3 state officials. Nicolas Costesti, one example oP msgv, owned several hectares of lend, one thresher, and one flour '...11. Be- cause of his undermining activities, he ves kept under close s,rr~eillance by the poor peasants end in particular by Ion Flores, s?:rotary of the VPM (Union of Working Youth; and collector for the r,SC.. On the evening before his subversive activities were to he sported, kale! Costesti visltedttrhome of the ~Fi'M secre- tary and offered him 30 kilogrsms of corn ss 3 bribe for "going easy on him," The secretsry immed'_gtrly reported Costesti ?o the authorities, and the kaiak vas punished severely. Similar bribes have often beep discovered by alert pea- sants and party officials who thwarted the A.pneasing policy oP the kulaks.(9) Sabotage o.? Politic:gl Meetings Quite offer kaiaks penetrate the rsn;cs of party politics with s view to disrupting the smooth organization of the party organs. At political meetings, they sit in the back rows and contrive means to persuade the working people to vote against proposed resolutions. On oea such ocession, a meeting was called by the Hundorf People's Council, in Sighisesrq Raien, to decide whether funds could be raised for the building of two bridge;, by means of self-taxation. Ths working peasants agreed unanimously to this proposal. Rovever, several kul- ake began to whisper provocations to the more backward groups of peasants, Snduc- ing them to dissent in their vote. Especially pzominent were the efforts of kaiak Virgil Moldovan, son of a staunch kaiak, who disrupted many meetings in similar __*ashion. Rovever, all the kaiaks ware quickly apprehended and are now avriting trial.(10) Similarly, at the recent Timis Regi~L~e meeting, the peasants discussed the new draft conetituti~n sad commended the new rights granted by t.hs new conatitu- tloa to all national minorities in R~imsnia, Puring the meeting, kaiak elements attempted to split the peasant vote o^ the issue c1' the newly established Hun- garian Autonomous Region. However, their efforts were quickly rebuked by the working people, who voted unanimously in favor of scenting equal ri;hta to na- tional minorities in Rumsals.(l.l) Mesaures Against Kulake To bring about an end to all kulsk activities, severe punishments must be imposed. Mosie Oprea of Lipova Regiuae, for example, was convicted of burying his quota. For this act he was sentenced to a fine of 500 new lei, surrender of his quota oP 3,375 kilograms of wheat and 663 kilograms of sunflower seed, and one year's imprisonment for fraud and misrepresentation. Likewise, Ion Vixen, steward of the Padureti cooperative in Costesti Raion, vas found guilty of declar- ing himself a "middle class peasant" rather than a kaiak, in order to escape high taxes. For this act, be was sentenced by the Pitesti t.rib,wal to 3 years' im- prisonmeat.(3) Similar kaiak trials take place slmos? daily throughout the entire country, Kaiaks are sent to prison, their goods are confiscated, sad they are ousted from the party ranks and from all political m=stings. All working peasants are alerted to report arty vithholdinge$ quotas or any subversive talk which is not in accord Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5 ~+ith party directives. Hrn+ever, despite all the preventive and punitive measures taken eo far, kulaks still continue to defy state measures. All people's coua_ cils and xorking peasants moat know that the liquidation of the kulak cl-. s is the prime requisite for the establishment of a socialist nation.(1) SOURCES 1. Lupta de Class, Feb/Mar 52 2. Vista Siadicala, 29 Jun 52 3. Unlversul, 26 Jun 52 4. Ibid., 9 Jan 52 5. Romania Libera, 19 Dec 51 6. Vista 5lndicala, 27 Jun 52 7. Romania Libera, 2~F Jua 52 8. Scanteia, 17 Jun 52 9. Vista Siadicala, 26 Jun 52 10. Romania Libera, 21 Jun 52 11. Ibid., 8 Au8 52 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/08/11 :CIA-RDP80-00809A000700090474-5