IRG/EUR MEETING ON PORT SECURITY, DECEMBER 19

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T01762A000900030015-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 12, 2003
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 13, 1966
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T01762A000900030015-1.pdf496.69 KB
Body: 
IRG/EUR 12 December 13. 1966 TO IRG/EUR Members Department of Justice - Mr. Doherty Department of Labor - Mr. Weaver Department of the-Treasury - Mr. Davis FROM Staff Director, IRG/EUR SUBJECT: IRG/EUR Meeting on Port Security, December 19 25X1 ships into U. S. ports. restrictions on entry of Soviet and Eastern European enclosures, containing Defense views on reducing Attached is a copy of~a letter dated December 8, 1966, from Secretary McNamara to Secretary Rusk, with Enclosure: As Stated OSD, JCS and DOS review(s) completed. Approved For Release 2003/08/08 : CIA-RDP79TO1762A000900030015-1 Approved'For Rele 4W6g1W.)CGWi1762A000900030015-1 WASHINGTON 8 DEC 1966 Honorable Dean Rusk Secretary of State Washington, D. C. 20520 Dear Dean: State, Treasury, and Defense have agreed that reductions in restric- tions on entry by Soviet and East European ships into US ports are desirable. I understand that in the past several years all US requests for permission for commercial ships to enter Soviet ports have been granted. The Joint Chiefs of Staff have recently provided additional recommendations; on this subject (JCSM-718-66, copy attached). I concur with `these recommendations and I feel we should t Soviet reduce our restrictions now, particularly in view of recen actions on our requests. It now appears that all interested departments might agree on the following four specific reductions in restrictions: 1. Changing search and surveillance checks from mandatory (applicable to all visits) to selective. Implementation of this recommendation should be gradual, so that there would be no abrupt change. 2. Opening all coastal ports in the continental US, except that no additional ports would be opened in the counties noted by the JCS. 3. Opening Anchorage, Seward, and Juneau to ocean-going ships engaged in international commerce. 4. Reducing the 30-day advance notice requirement for entry to 7 days. I strongly support reductions in restrictions on Soviet and East European citizens where the reductions can be accomplished without danger to national security. I believe the changes recommended above would substantially contribute to the President's "bridge- building" program set forth in NSAM 352. I am requesting the .Defense representative on the Port Security Committee, the Under !T Ly el 15 0 Approved For Release 2003/08/08 : CIA-RDP79TO1762A000900030015-1 Approved For Release 2003/088: CIA-RDP79T01762A000900030015-1 Secretary of the Navy, to ask that the committee be convened to consider the Defense recommendations. I hope it will be possible to reach early agreement. Sincerely Attachment JCSM-718-66 Secretary of the Treasury Acting Atty General Director, CIA Secretary of Transportation SECRET Approved For Release 2003/08/08 : CIA-R,DP,79T01.762A000900030015-1 17 All. ^ 4 2 SECRET Approved For Release 2003/08/08 : CIA-RDP79TO1762A000900030015-1 THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 361 WASHINGTON, D.G. 20301 M7::, !06PNDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE esuionage and subversLcn. G 196x,, reeuesting recommendations concernin. which reap. , Hawaiian, and Alaskan ports might be opened to Soviet and East European shipping. A reouest'was also made. for recor.--- mendations as to what minimuTm number of ports should remain Clo,^ed to such shipping. Le _;3 C- r. - `-.~ _e t. u fiber of o~ ts o : provides additional opportunity for tf?e I..Or 1SS-.on 01 sabo=) ~ a`Te JCSM-718-66 16 November !9C3 Subject: Reducing Restrictions on Entry by Soviet and East European Ships Into US Ports (U) (S) Reference is made to a memorandum by the Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense (ISA), 1-27039/66, dated 19 October 1- ; kes 3. (S) The following comments are also submitted in response o your memorandum: 14 r7r,v, a. The Joint Chiefs of ~ Staf:. ~`'v cr_nr`i that the United States should obtain similar relaxations on the part of the Soviets and the East Europeans. b. The opening of any port should contingent upo;i the development of security arranger.unts acceptable to the Depart- ment of Defense, as well as to the Port Security Committee. Cr_ - f~ .~ 57.......,, each GROUP I Eclude:i from : i Cr tiG Girc aru o daHne r Approved For Release 20 3 CIA-RDP 07~f'1762A000900030015-1 SLCDC Approved For Release 2003/08/08 : CIA-RDP79TO1762A000900030015-1 orts of Anchorages, Seward, and Juneau. skan Al d Th p a e . may be opened for ocean-going vessels engaged in international commerce. The extension of similar privileges to the very large and growing number of Soviet fishing vessels operating nd/or transiting the Alaskan waters would pose prohibitive i n a security requirements. Soviet and East European nationals entering the Alaskan seaports aboard vessels should be restricted to the port cities. e. No Hawaiian ports should be opened. The island, of Oahu serves as the base for a major military command center and staging area in support of US operations in Vietnam. The United States is engaged in military conflict there against forces receiving extensive material support carried by Soviet and East European ships. Visits to Hawaiian ports by such ships would expose US operations in support of Vietnam to llection and the ris: of sabotage and would lli gence co inte require the imposition of additional security tasks on existing These heavily committed security surveillance resources. ecially on islands other than Oahu, are not es p resources, sufficient to cope with additional requirements at the time. orts in the United States, less Alaska and stal C f p oa . Hawaii, may be opened to ocean-goin vessels engaged in inter- Li d es coup national commerce, except ports within the close listed in Appendix B. 4. (S) The day-to-day application of port security procedures is presently the responsibility of the Coast Guard and the Bureau of Customs, both components of the Departs nt of the Treasury. The scheduled transfer' of the Coast Guarc~ to the new Department of Transportation may well result in an interim period of admini- strative difficulty in maintaining necessary coordination between these two agencies in safeguarding US ports. In view of this, t Chiefs of Staff reco.-unend that ne final action be taken i h J n o e t to open any US ports without practical a:ser_zrances that an acceptable degree of protection against attempts at ,-oionage, sa.-o'tage, or subversion can be afforded at all times a---I under all circumstances. Gt cfr f .- For the Jo ~_,rut ef s ' f / 1 /V 6'1 t ' (-'t// ~ J I-N C. MEYER Majr General, USA / Deputy irector, Joint Staff I Y "Public Law 89-670, Section 6b for transfer, Section 15 for the effective date. .2 SECRET Approved For Release 2003/08/08 : CIA-RDP79TO1762A000900030015-1 25X1 Approved For Release 2003/08/08 : CIA-RDP79TO1762A000900030015-1 Approved For Release 2003/08/08 : CIA-RDP79TO1762A000900030015-1 SECRET STATE Approved For Release 2003/08/08 : CIA-RDP79T01762A000900030015-1 w California Connecticut Delaware Kent ' 10 Florida Bay 11 '-Brevard 12 -Dade 13 .-Duval 11+ t'Iiillsborough 15 Monroe 16 Okaloosa 17 ----(Pinellas 18 Newport 28 Washinfi.ton 29 GROUP 1 EXCLUDED FBOIi AUTG;.u'LTI T C ryland L,ssex 22 iii ssissippi Hancock 23 Harrison 21+ Pew Itampshire Rockingham 25 New Jersey Monmouth 26 Rhode Island Bristol 27 APPENDIX B CLOSED COASTAL COUNTIES COUNTY Contra Costa Marin Orange All ports on the Sacramento River San Diego Santa Barbara Ventura Walton 19 Ct M ry I s 20 1',assac',-,usetts Barnstable New London - 8 Sussex 9 DO+rfl' GRADING AIID DECLASSIFICA2':ON .iazhington Gloucester City of Ya;pton Icing George York Island Jefferson Ting (except Seattle) Kitsap Pierce 8 9 10 11