A FOOTNOTE TO SOVIET GROWTH

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T01003A001900080001-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
12
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 30, 1999
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 1, 1964
Content Type: 
BRIEF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T01003A001900080001-2.pdf477.7 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP79TO1003A001900080001 ~ ti FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Current Support Brief A FOOTNOTE TO SOVIET GROWTH CIA/RR CB 64-13 February 1964 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Office of Research and Reports FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01900080001-2 F Approved Fob elSape,Z000/04117 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01900080001-2 The purpose of this publication is to project the discussion of recent estimates of rates of Soviet economic growth a step forward by consider- ing some possible patterns for the near future, particularly 1964. It is not intended to be a forecast of the growth likely to be achieved in the next year or two. To set the stage, it is instructive to review the performance of the Soviet economy in 1962 and 1963, using the preliminary estimates for the latter year. A simplified model of gross national product (GNP) by sector of origin consists of agriculture, industry, and "all other. " "All other" includes such categories as construction, transportation, communications, services (as for education and health), and domestic trade. To each of these three sectors can be assigned an equal one-third weight, which is not too far from the actual weights used in the more detailed calculations of this Office -- 36.2 percent for agriculture, 30.3 percent for industry, and 33. 5 percent for "all other. " By using the simplified model, the following percentage changes are determined for 1962 and 1963 (com- pared with the previous year in each case): 1962 and 1963 (Percent of Change) Agriculture - Industry 7 "All other" 4 GNP increase 2.3 Clearly it was the negative agricultural weight that acted as the primary depressant to growth in the Soviet economy in 1962 and 1963. In projecting possible patterns of growth in 1964, the rates of growth for industry and for the "all other" category at a constant 7 percent and 4 percent, respectively, are reasonable first approximations of likely achievement. By varying agricultural performance, the follow- ing alternative models* can be constructed. * These models are not intended to be comprehensive but only as first approximations that reflect possible trends within the economy. As such, no attempt has been made to [footnote continued on p. 21 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01900080001-2 Approved For Release 2P 04fTF 9aQ O3A001900080001-2 Possible Percent of Change in 1964 Compared with 1963 Model (1) Model (2) Model 3) Agriculture 0 4 8 Industry 7 7 7 "All other" 4 4 4 GNP increase 3.7 5.0 6.3 Under Model (1), agricultural output would be the same as in 1963, but over-all growth of GNP would increase from 2. 3 percent in 1963 to 3. 7 percent in 1964. Thus if 1964 were to be a year of stagnation in agriculture -- that is, zero growth -- the USSR again could be in the market for substantial quantities of wheat or feed grains from the West. Such circumstances would be a disaster, or near disaster, to the USSR. However, severe shortages of grain would not inevitably accompany an absence of growth in agriculture: production of wheat in the USSR could recover while output of other agricultural products that carry large weights in the index of over-all output, such as livestock, declined sufficiently to neutralize the improvement in output of grain. Under Model (2), agriculture would recover by a modest 4 percent, to about the level of 1962 - - a level unsatisfactory to the Soviet leader- ship. However, over-all growth of GNP would be 5 percent, which statistically would look ?i4ce a respectable upturn. The point is that unless the USSR is able to register an increase of 5 percent in GNP for 1964, it could well be in serious economic difficulties again; an increase of 5 percent in GNP is the minimum performance that could likely be classified as a "get-by" level. Model (3) shows an increase of 8 percent in agricultural output, which is approximately the increase needed to restore agriculture to the level of 1961, thus providing a modest surplus beyond domestic needs and the need for agricultural exports to the European Satellites if the major recovery were to be in grain crops. Such a level of analyze the interrelated effects of the growth of one sector on the others. For example, within the industrial sector the food-processing and textile industries would be related to the growth of the agricultural sector. A weighted arithmetic average has been used to compute the growth of GNP. Approved For Release 20buO/$4R~E iRl'bf66A001900080001-2 Approved Fob ted ?-AR0/~ 170 l~-RDP79T01003AO01900080001-2 production in agriculture would be consistent with an increase of 6. 3 per- cent in GNP for 1964. However, if agriculture in 1965 were to do no more than hold this level while the other economic sectors advanced as they have in recent years, over-all growth of GNP again would fall to 3. 7 per- cent [Model (1)]. Recovery in the rate of growth of GNP in 1964 would not necessarily mean that the USSR was on the road to recovery in agriculture -- indeed, a rate of growth of 4 percent could find domestic wheat supplies again far short of needs. Moreover, unless there is a significant acceleration in the rate of growth in industry or other nonagricultural activity -- which is not foreseen at the moment -- continued substantial increases in agricultural output beyond 1964 would be required to return economic growth to a sustained high level comparable to the 1950's. STATINTL Analyst: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01900080001-2 Approved For Re e 0PPAj/L7,.1A t PY79T01003A001900080001-2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001900080001-2 Analyst: WE SSTT01INTL Approved F a gag. 00__ I,p~1~O69A00080D " lf. Et ..-r~s K 1 l~l~a ;r E It I' E OF _ xt.ies Nurnbei CIA/RR CB 64-13 ate xt Document February 1964 tte lent 33 35 163-200 163 164- 166 167... 168 169 ... 170, 171 172 173 ----17.5- 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 1831-. 185 DAD~RR_ _ AD /RR._.. 186 OB/HRG/CGS, 3F30 H FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY iassi ccatiiwt Nu nber of Copie.z4 __23.0..- 7Feb. 64 11 Feb 64 12 Feb 64 13 _Feb 64 -_STATINTL 187 200 Filed in St/P/C _ 201 - 210 DDI 11 Feb 64. STATINTL ~S< 22 YY~a, ~i ti -7,S?ATI NTL ~/"c.- ~"?2, -,/ 2i r /f c ~ ~ ~'' p OO~TI'42TI NTL STATINTL- - / -/ .0,1 ye- /16" r '~ --Orv 17e G V Z a- 2 6 A ved ForOZe 1`2 /1 : C4ior R TA 904$fti V 0080001-2 fir' 6 y 9 e i- c/? 6 a-~'Z7 -Z-' 1,66 /63 ~ Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001900080001-2 Approved For ReleI /4 :1-9T01003A001900080001-2 SUBJECT; Distribution of Current Support Brief No. 64-13, A Footnote to goyigl w h --- February 1964 (FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Copy No. Recipient 1 O/DDI, Room 7E32, Hdgtre. 2-3 NIC 4 - 12 OCI Internal 13- 15 ONE 16 - 21 St/CS/RR 22 O/DDI - Chester Cooper 23 31 NSA C312 32 . NSAL 33 - 230 ORR Distribution, St/A/Document Support Section, Room GH0915, Hdqtrs, (Sent direct to St/A/DSS, 11 Feb 64). (Distributed by OCI Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP79T01003A001900080001-2 rl'R 0-1F L' L USE LY # rj IFf!Lr , !V i~ 16 ~ L . p St/A11Petbfri2rG:RBe?~QQ)lic~~t~796T~11~303.A,,O'oo80 800001-2 Soviet X Growth --- February 1964 (FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY` - C2y No, 1 34 36 - 40 41 -46 47 - 52 53 - 60 61 - 69 70 - 71 72 - 73 74 15-80 81 82 8.3 84 35 86 87 38 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 - 97 98 99 - 100 101 102 103 - 113 114 - 127 128 - 137 138 - 139 140 - 143 144 - 155 156 - 159 160 - 161 162 Recipient Zdmi*ft ARKS& St/PR D/A (I each branch) D/MS (1 each branch) D/R (1 each branch) D/M (1 each branch) 1)/I (1 each branch) D/GG D/GC D/GC/X RID/AN, St/FM Unit 4. Ro o N f 4004, Hqo STA Analyst /Branch GR/ CR BR/CR FIB /SR/ CR, Library / CR IPI/CR VMR, A-18 AD/OO Chief, FDD CD/OO Ch/E) 1G27, Hq? OCI/RP/PS, Room 7G15, Hqo DDI/CGS, Room 7F35, Hq. DDI/CGS/HR, Room 3F30, Hqo OSI OBI OTR/IS/IP, Room 532, Broyhill Bldg, 0 - OTR/SIC) NPIC/CSD/REF, Room 1S518, Bldg. 213 Commandant Nat'l. War College, Ft, Leslie McNair, Attn: Classified Records Section, Rrn, 26, Nat'l. War Colle e Bld W h g g., , as ., , 25, D, C, ACSI/Army, Room IC460, Pentagon Navy, Director, ONI, Room 5B659, Pentagon HQ0 USAF, Attn: AFNIN- 3D 1, Room 4B137, Pentagon Asst, Secretary of Defense, ISA, Room 4D825, Pentagon USIA, Warren Phelps, IRR/D, Room 701, Walker Johnson Building, 1734 New York Avenue, N. WD State, INR Communications Center, Room 7818, State Dept. Bldg, DIA, DIASA-2C, Room 2D233, Pentagon Dr. Neilson Debevoise, NSC, Room 365, Executive Office Building Frank M., C.harrette, Agency for International Develo pment, Chief, Statistics and Reports Division, Room 302, State Annex No. 1 z 00 A St/P``/,QC~ Roo lea 2 ~0/ ~ ?~kLl ,79-F0Jr@03 001900080001-2 91'x[ US'E ONLY Approved For- l ejease 2000/04/17: CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01900080001-2 18 Febr, M 4 RANIRt4 FC is t ef, Dissemination Control Branch, DD/CR n am Chief, Publications Staffs ORE SUBJECT : Transmittal of Material it is re4uested that the attached copies of CIA/RR CB 64-13s A Footnote to Soviet C3rowth February 196 s For official use th1ys be forwarded as t owe: States TNR Counicati.one Center, Room 7818, State Dept. Bldg. For babassies in Berlin, Moscow, Bonn, Yrankfurt, London,, and New I*1hi STATINTL Attachments: Copiee . 89 - 194 of CB 64-13 cc: CGR/RB 7- f TED Tha c.nscvr, L?nn rF?~:: es'-d by !us mo+norandurn has been completed; 6Y. Date: Approved For Release 2000/04/17 CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01900080001-2 Approved For Release 2000/G4/ : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01900080001-2 '. !eject. No O. 5098 Report Series CIA./RR CB 64-13 le -AFootnote to Soviet Growth (For Official Use Only) -tesponsible Analyst and Branch __ Ch/E RECOMMENDED DISTRIBUTION TO STATE POSTS .Perlin, Germany Bangkok, Thailand Mexico Bucharest, Romania Djakarta, Indonesia Guatemala Budapest, Hungary Hong Kong Panama Moscow, USSR Rangoon, Burma Brazillia, Brazil Prague, Czechoslovakia Kuala Lumpur, Malaya Buenos Aires, Argentina Sofia, Bulgaria Saigon, Vietnam Bogota, Colombia Warsaw. Poland Seoul, Korea Santiago, Chile Singapore, British Malaya La Paz, Bolivia :u.ro e Taipei, Formosa Montevideo, Uruguay Tokyo, Japan Caracas, Venezuela Belgrade. Yugoslavia Vientiane, Laos Bern, Switzerland Phnom Penh, Cambodia Africa Bonn, Germany Colombo, Ceylon Brussels, Belgium Yaonde, Cameroun Copenhagen, Denmark Leopoldville, Congo Frankfurt, Germany Addis Ababa, Ethopia Geneva, Switzerland Ankara, Turkey Accra, Ghana Helsinki. Finland Athens, Greece Abidjan, Ivory Coast The Hague, Netherlands Cairo, Egypt Nairobi, Kenya Lisbon, Portugal Damascus, Syria Monrovia, Liberia London, England Kabul, Afghanistan Tripoli, Libya Luxembourg, Luxembourg Karachi, Pakistan Rabat, Morocco Madrid, Spain mew Delhi, India Lagos, Nigeria Oslo, Norway Nicosia, Cyprus Mogadiscio, Somal Paris, France Tehran, Iran Khartoum, Sudan Rome, Italy Baghdad, Iraq Tunis, Tunisia Stockholm, Sweden Tel Aviv, Israel Pretoria, South Africa Vienna, Austria Beirut, Lebanon Algiers, Algeria Amman, Jordon Cotonou, Dahomey acific Jidda, Saudi Arabia Dakar, Senegal Bamako, Mali p Wellington, New Zealand Manila, Philippines Canberra,, Australia Melbourne, Australia Ottawa, Canada G Ig Excluded from automatic IBL i'r ddI puradU^"and Approved For Release 2000/04/17 : CIA-RDP71003A001900080001-2 S-E-C-R-E-T App e ,F$LFeJe e O~Qo/0 T/ROL P~ RO PROCESS SHEET -Subject e /af Analyst and Branch 25X1A -Unedited draft Edited draft Other ao Text check b< Source check co Releasable to: 25X1 C yes )TS TRIB U TION sent to AD/RR ? sent to DDI -3 checked for release )L/PSD notified to Disseminate Group 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassify c$tion 04/1r : CIA-RDP79TO1003AO01900080001-2